Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T12:03:07.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microbial diversity in the era of genomics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Rita R. Colwell
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
N. A. Logan
Affiliation:
Glasgow Caledonian University
H. M. Lappin-Scott
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
P. C. F Oyston
Affiliation:
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down
Get access

Summary

THE CONTINUING SAGA OF THE MICROBIAL SPECIES

Fundamental to the assessment of global microbial diversity is understanding the unit of measurement of diversity, namely the microbial species. Historically, definition of a microbial species has been accomplished by employing relatively crude methods based on laboratory culture. Limitations of both the methods and the philosophical construct underpinning the species definition for micro-organisms have been elaborately detailed by Woese (2004), who pointed out the fallacies of the ‘concept of a bacterium’ that led to the inclusion of all bacteria (as then understood) within the single grouping of ‘prokaryotes’, with a shared ‘prokaryotic’ organization evolved ultimately from a common prokaryotic ancestor (Stanier & van Niel, 1962; Stanier et al., 1957, 1963). Woese (2004) tracks the history of the ‘prokaryote–eukaryote’ dichotomy to the protozoologist Edouard Chatton (1938), whose reasoning was that, just as nucleated cells represented a monolithic grouping structurally and phylogenetically, non-nucleated cells (bacteria) also do so. Woese (2004) provides an eloquent explanation for the lack of philosophical understanding impelled by, on the one hand, technological advance and, on the other, ‘fundamentalist reductionism’ (the reductionism of 19th century classical physics), namely the view that living systems can be completely understood in terms of the properties of their constituent parts. The unfortunate aspect of fundamentalist reductionism is that it ignores the notion of emergent properties. The definition of a ‘micro-organism’ is, in itself, elusive.

Type
Chapter
Information
Prokaryotic Diversity
Mechanisms and Significance
, pp. 1 - 18
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×