Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T08:23:03.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Product liability law in Central Europe and the true impact of the Product Liability Directive

from PART III - Comparing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Magdalena Sengayen
Affiliation:
Research Officer in Product Liability and Regulatory Issues, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies Oxford University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This study investigates the process of evolution of Central European product liability regimes, with particular attention to the effect of the implementation of the Product Liability Directive in the context of the 2004 Enlargement of the European Union. Central Europe has been chosen as an example of a region which, although remaining under a strong Socialist influence until 1989, has had a long and relatively close relationship with the West. This relationship placed the Central Europeans in a position described by Alan Mayhew as ‘floating dangerously between East and West’. David and Brierley, in 1985, classified the Central European countries, together with Slovenia and Croatia, as the ‘countries of western tradition’ among the Socialist jurisdictions. They pointed out the common historical development of the ‘western tradition’ with Germany, Austria and France – the tradition of Romano-Germanic law. Central European countries seemed to have been too highly developed for a direct implementation of the Communist concepts from Soviet Russia. They were the first nations to break free from the Socialist grip, and the first post-Socialist nations to have concluded Association Agreements with the European Union. The region, so distinct from the West but also so deeply linked to it, is a particularly fertile ground upon which analyses of the post-Socialist transformations can be carried out.

Product liability law, like every other new, specialised discipline of law, has created some confusion within legal science more generally.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×