Harper, LM, Caughy, AB, Odibo, AO, et al. Normal progress of induced labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012;96:671–7Google Scholar

Seyb, ST, Berka, RJ, Socol, ML, Dooley, SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600–7Google Scholar

Macer, JA, Macer, CL, Chan, LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1690–6Google Scholar

Cammu, H, Marten, G, Ruyssinck, G, Amy, JJ. Outcome after elective induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:240–4Google Scholar

Luthy, DA, Malmgren, JA, Zingheim, RW. Increased Cesarean section rates associated with elective induction in nulliparous women; the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1511–15Google Scholar

Dublin, S, Lydon-Rochelle, M, Kaplan, RC, Watts, DH, Critchlow, CW. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;18:986–94Google Scholar

van Gemund, N, Hardeman, A, Scherjon, SA, Kanhai, HH. Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset: a matched cohort study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;56:133–8Google Scholar

Maslow, AS, Sweeny, AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:917–22Google Scholar

Jonsson, M, Cnattingius, S, Wikström, AK. Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low-risk parous women: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:198–203Google Scholar

Kauffman, K, Bailit, J, Grobman, W. Elective induction: an analysis of economic and health consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:858–63Google Scholar

Vahratian, A, Zhang, J, Troendle, JF, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698–704Google Scholar

Guerra, GV, Cecatti, JG, Souza, JP, et al. WHO Global Survey on Maternal Perinatal Health in Latin America Study Group. Elective induction versus spontaneous labour in Latin America. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89:657–65Google Scholar

Yeast, JD, Jones, A, Poskin, M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery; a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:628–33Google Scholar

Johnson, DP, Davis, NR, Brown, AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1565–72Google Scholar

Johnson, AM, Bellerose, L, Billstrom, R, Deckers, E, Beller, P. Evaluating outcomes of labor inductions beyond 39 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123 Suppl 1:58SGoogle Scholar

Vrouenraets, FP, Roumen, FJ, Dehing, CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:690–7Google Scholar

Nuutila, M, Halmesmäki, E, Hiilesmaa, V, Ylikorkala, O. Women’s anticipations of and experiences with induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:704–9Google Scholar

Bramadat, IJ. Induction of labor: an integrated review. Health Care Women Int 1994;15:135–48Google Scholar

Shetty, A, Burt, R, Rice, P, Templeton, A. Women’s perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour—a questionnaire-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;123:56–61Google Scholar

Henderson, J1, Redshaw, M. Women’s experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:1159–67Google Scholar

Hildingsson, I, Karlström, A, Nystedt, A. Women’s experiences of induction of labour: findings from a Swedish regional study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;51:151–7Google Scholar

Mishanina, E, Rogozinska, E, Thatthi, T, et al. Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Med Assoc J 2014;186:665–73Google Scholar

Grobman, WA. Elective induction: when? ever? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50:537–546Google Scholar

Gibson, KS, Waters, TP, Bailit, JL. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:249. Epub 2014 Mar 12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stock, SJ, Ferguson, E, Duffy, A, et al. Outcomes of elective induction of labor compared with expectant management: population based study. Br Med J 2012;344:e2838Google Scholar

Darney, BG, Snowden, JM, Cheng, YW, et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:761–9Google Scholar

Keirse, MJ. Elective induction, selective deduction, and cesarean section. Birth 2010;37:252–56Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Blackwell, SC, Ramin, SM, Sibai, BM, Saade, GR. Use and misuse of the term “elective” in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:372–6Google Scholar

Caughey, AB, Sundaram, V, Kaimal, AJ, et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:252–63Google Scholar

Gülmezoglu, AM, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P, Heatley, E. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012Google Scholar

Wennerholm, UB, Hagberg, H, Brorsson, B, Bergh, C. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: Is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical practice? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:6–17Google Scholar

Wood, S, Cooper, S, Ross, S. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;121:674–85; discussion 685Google Scholar

Macones, GA. Elective induction of labor: Waking the sleeping dogma? Ann Intern Med 2009;151:281–2Google Scholar

NHS maternity 2010. NHS maternity statistics, 2009–10. NHS Information Centre (http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=1475)Google Scholar

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Ventura, SJ, Osterman, MJK, Mathews, TJ. Births: Final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013;62:1–90Google Scholar

Goffinet, F, Dreyfus, M, Carbonne, B, Magnin, G, Cabrol, D. Survey of the practice of cervical ripening and labor induction in France. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2003;32:638–46 (in French)Google Scholar

Wing, DA, Lockwood, CJ, Barss, VA. Induction of labor. UpToDate, Accessed November 2014. www. UpToDate.comGoogle Scholar

ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. Induction of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 107, 2009Google Scholar

Leduc, D, Biringer, A, Lee, L, Dy, J. Induction of labor. SOGC Clinical practice guideline No 296, September 3013. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013;35:S1–18Google Scholar

Koopmans, CM, Bijlenga, D, Groen, H, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:979–88Google Scholar

Bewley, S, Shennan, A. HYPITAT and the fallacy of pregnancy interruption. Lancet 2010;375:119Google Scholar

North, RA. Classification and diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. In: Lyall, F, Belfort, M, eds. Pre-eclampsia: Etiology and Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press; 2007Google Scholar

National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Hypertension in pregnancy: the management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. August 2010 (revised reprint January 2011) www.nice.org.uk (accessed October 2014)Google Scholar

Tomashek, KM, Shapiro-Mendoza, CK, Davidoff, MJ, Petrini, JR. Differences in mortality between late-preterm and term singleton infants in the United States, 1995–2002. J Pediatr 2007;151:450–56Google Scholar

Loftin, RW, Habli, M, Snyder, CC, et al. Late preterm birth. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010;3:10–9Google Scholar

Ramachandrappa, A, Jain, L. Health issues of the late preterm infant. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009;56:565–77Google Scholar

Santos, IS, Matijasevich, A, Domingues, MR, et al. Late preterm birth is a risk factor for growth faltering in early childhood: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2009;9: 71. Published online November 16, 2009. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-71Google Scholar

Bassil, KL, Yasseen, AS, Walker, M, et al. The association between obstetrical interventions and late preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:538.e1–9Google Scholar

Pauli, JM, Lauring, JR, Stetter, CM, et al. Management of gestational hypertension: the impact of HYPITAT. J Perinat Med 2013;41:415–20Google Scholar

van der Tuuk, K, Koopmans, CM, Groen, H, et al. Impact of the HYPITAT trial on doctors’ behaviour and prevalence of eclampsia in the Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118:1658–60Google Scholar

Rossi, AC, Mullin, P, Prefumo, F. Prevention, management, and outcomes of macrosomia: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2013;68:702–9Google Scholar

Sanchez-Ramos, K, Bernstein, S, Kaunitz, AM. Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:997–1002Google Scholar

Pereira, S, Frick, AP, Poon, LC, Zamprakou, A, Nicolaides, KH, et al. Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014 May 15. doi: 10.1002/uog.13411. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Verhoeven, CJ, Opmeer, BC, Oei, SG, et al. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:500–8Google Scholar

Gokturk, U, Cavkaytar, S, Danısman, N. Prediction of successful labor induction by measuring cervical length, fetal head position and posterior cervical angle can be alternative method to Bishop score? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;15:1–30. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Bishop, EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:266–8Google Scholar

Prysak, M, Castronova, FC. Elective induction versus spontaneous delivery: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:47–52Google Scholar

Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC, Neilson, J, et al. Preparing for the induction of labor. In: A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000Google Scholar

Grobman, WA. Predictors of induction success. Semin Perinatol 2012;36:344–7Google Scholar