Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-4hcbs Total loading time: 0.707 Render date: 2021-12-06T06:43:49.937Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2021

David Grant
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Privacy in the Age of Neuroscience
Reimagining Law, State and Market
, pp. 303 - 306
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barney, W. L. (ed.). A Companion to 19th-Century America. Blackwell, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenberg, H. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. Work on Myth. MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J.Fasken Lecture – The essence of responsive regulation’. University of British Columbia Law Review 44:3 (2001).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J.Types of Responsiveness’, in Regulation Theory – Foundations and Applications, Drahos, P. (ed.). Australian National University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Zhang, Y.. ‘Persia to China: the Silk Road of restorative justice’, Asian Journal of Criminology 12:1 (2017): 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The British Academy. Reforming Business for the 21st Century: A Framework for the Future of the Corporation (2018) (published online)Google Scholar
Brownsword, R., Scotford, E., and Yeung, K. Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology. Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Christl, W. ‘Corporate Surveillance in Everyday Life – How Companies Collect, Combine, Analyse, Trade and Use Personal Data on Billions’. Report by Cracked Labs (Institute for Critical Digital Culture), Vienna, June 2017.Google Scholar
Christian, B. and Griffiths, T. Algorithms to Live By. Henry Holt, 2016.Google Scholar
Dau-Schmidt, K.The impact of emerging information technologies on the employment relationship: New gigs for labor and employment law’. University of Chicago Legal Forum 2017: Article 4 (2018).Google Scholar
Descartes, R. Discourse on Method and Related Writings. Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. Meditations on First Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Domingos, P. The Master Algorithm. Allen Lane, 2015.Google Scholar
Drahos, P. (ed.). Regulation Theory – Foundations and Applications. Australian National University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
du Plessis, J.Corporate social responsibility and contemporary community expectations’. C&SLJ 35:30 (2017).Google Scholar
du Plessis, J. ‘Myths about Underlying Theories and Principles of Corporate Law and Other Ways of Recognising the Interests of All Stakeholders’, Annual CLTA Conference, Auckland University (4–5 February 2019).Google Scholar
du Plessis, J. ‘The Purpose of the Corporation Redefined: Recent Developments in Australia and the US’, Ross Parsons Corporate Lecture, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney (2 March 2020).Google Scholar
du Plessis, J.Shareholder primacy and other stakeholder interests’. Corporate Governance, Corporate Responsibility and Law C&SLJ 3:238 (2016).Google Scholar
Elias, N. The Civilising Process. Blackwell, 2003.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. ‘The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate’. Big Data and Society (July–December 2016).Google Scholar
Floridi, L. The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Floridi, L.Four for a theory of informational privacy’. Ethics and Information Technology 8:3 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L.The logic of design as a conceptual logic of information’. Minds and Machines 27:3 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L.What the near future of artificial intelligence could be’. Philosophy and Technology 32 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. and Cowls, J.A unified framework of five principles for AI in society’. Harvard Data Science Review, no. 1 (2019).Google Scholar
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., and Chatila, R. ‘An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles and Recommendations’. ResearchGate (November 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. The Birth of Biopolitics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish. Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect, Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (eds.). Harvester, 1991.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. Security, Territory, Population. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Fox-Decent, E.Trust and Authority’, in Fiduciaries and Trust – Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law, Miller, P. and Harding, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Francis, L. and Francis, J. Privacy – What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaukroger, S. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture. Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertzel, B. and Goertzel, T. (eds.). The End of the Beginning – Life, Society and Economy on the Brink of the Singularity. Humanity+ Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Grant, D. The Mythological State and Its Empire. Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Grant, D. Prisons – The Continuing Crisis. Federation Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Grant, D. and Bennett Moses, L. Technology and the Trajectory of Myth. Edward Elgar, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, S. Lord Have Mercy – The Healing Power of Confession. Darton, Longman and Todd, 2017.Google Scholar
Harding, M.Contracts, Fiduciary Relationships and Trust’, in Fiduciaries and Trust – Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law, Miller, P. and Harding, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Harding, M.Responding to trust’, Ratio Juris 24:1 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Routledge, 1982.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. Being and Time. Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Harper, 1977.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hunter, I. Rival Enlightenments. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers. Ethically Aligned Design, first edition (published online).Google Scholar
Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kenyon, A. and Richardson, M. New Dimensions in Privacy Law. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. Fear and Trembling. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Krygier, M. ‘Conservative-liberal-socialism’. Symposium 11:1 (2002).Google Scholar
Krygier, M.The rule of law: Pasts, presents and two possible futures’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12 (2016): 199229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, M.Too Much Information’, in Cosmopolitan Jurisprudence: Essays in Memory of H. Patrick Glenn, Dedek, Helge (ed.). Cambridge University Press, American Society of Comparative Law Series, forthcoming 2020.Google Scholar
Krygier, M.What’s the point of the rule of law?Buffalo Law Review 67:3 (2019).Google Scholar
Langford, R. TeelePurpose-based governance: A new paradigm’. University of New South Wales Law Journal 42 (2020).Google Scholar
Lilti, A. The Invention of Celebrity. Polity, 2017.Google Scholar
Locke, J. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Luther, M. Here I Stand. Hendricksen, 2011.Google Scholar
Madary, M. and Metzinger, T. ‘Real virtuality: A code of ethical conduct. Recommendations for the good scientific practice and the consumers of VR-technology’. Frontiers in Robotics and AI (2016). doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, C. The Nineteenth Century – The British Isles 1815–1901. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Metzinger, T. Being No One – The Self-Model of Subjectivity. MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. On Liberty. Pelican, 1974.Google Scholar
Miller, P.Political (Dis)trust and Fiduciary Government’, in Fiduciaries and Trust – Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law, Miller, P. and Harding, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M. The Emotion Machine. Simon and Schuster, 2006.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de la Brede et de. The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Moore, Adam D. ‘Privacy, Neuroscience and Neuro-surveillance’. January 2020, ResearchGate.Google Scholar
Moore, Adam D. New Oxford Annotated Bible. New Standard Version with The Apocrypha. Oxford University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Nilsson, N. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, H. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ockham, W. Quodlibetal Questions, trans. Freddoso, A. J. and Kelley, E., 2 vols. Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. Republicanism. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Postema, G.Trust, Distrust, and the Rule of Law’, in Fiduciaries and Trust – Ethics, Politics, Economics and Law, Miller, P. and Harding, M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. The Right to Privacy. Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings, Levine, D. (ed.). University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Simmel, G.The Secret and the Secret Society’, in The Sociology of George Simmel, Wolff, K. (ed.). Free Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. Kierkegaard’s Concept of Despair. Princeton University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentmann, F. Empire of Things. Penguin, 2017.Google Scholar
van Krieken, R. Norbert Elias. Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Yeung, K.Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation’. Regulation & Governance 12 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, A.Privacy as trust: Sharing personal information in a networked world’. University of Miami Law Review 69:559 (2015).Google Scholar
Waldron, J.How law protects dignity’. The Cambridge Law Journal 71:1 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J.The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure’, in Getting to the Rule of Law, Fleming, J. (ed.). New York University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. Profile Books, 2019.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David Grant, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Privacy in the Age of Neuroscience
  • Online publication: 09 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108883931.013
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David Grant, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Privacy in the Age of Neuroscience
  • Online publication: 09 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108883931.013
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David Grant, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Privacy in the Age of Neuroscience
  • Online publication: 09 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108883931.013
Available formats
×