Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:17:00.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Claims Triangles/Loss Reserves

from IV - Longitudinal Modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Greg Taylor
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
Edward W. Frees
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Richard A. Derrig
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Glenn Meyers
Affiliation:
ISO Innovative Analytics, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Chapter Preview. This chapter considers the application of predictive models to insurance claims triangles and the associated prediction problem of loss reserving (Section 18.1). This is approached initially by reference to the chain ladder, a widely used heuristic reserving algorithm. Rigorous predictive models, in the form of Generalized linear models (GLMs) that reproduce this algorithm, are then explored (Section 18.2). The chain ladder has a restricted model structure and a number of embellishments are considered (Section 18.3). These include the incorporation in the model of accident year effects through the use of exposure data (e.g., accident year claim counts) (Section 18.3.2), and also the incorporation of claim closure data (Section 18.3.3). A subsequent section considers models that incorporate claim closure data on an operational time basis (Section 18.3.4). In each of these cases emphasis is placed on the ease of inclusion of these model features in the GLM structure. All models in Sections 18.1 to 18.3 relate to conventional claims triangles. These datasets are aggregate, as opposed to unit record claim datasets that record detail of individual claims. The chapter closes with a brief introduction to individual claim models (18.4). On occasion these models use survival analysis as well as GLMs.

Introduction to Loss Reserving

18.1.1 Meaning and Accounting Significance of Loss Reserving

Typically, property & casualty (P&C) insurance will indemnify the insured against events that occur within a defined period.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brookes, R. and M., Prevett (2004). Statistical case estimation modelling – an overview of the NSW WorkCover model. Institute of Actuaries of Australia Xth Accident compensation Seminar. http://www.actuaries.asn.au/Library/Accident\%20Compensation\%20Seminar\%20SCE\%20Paper\%20RGB\%2022Nov04\%20final.pdf.
Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 34, 187–220.Google Scholar
De Jong, P. and B., Zehnwirth (1983). Claims reserving state space models and the Kalman filter. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries 110, 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, P. D. and R. J., Verrall (2002). Stochastic claims reserving in general insurance. British Actuarial Journal 8, 443–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frees, E. and P., Wang (1990). A stochastic method for claims reserving in general insurance. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries 117, 677–731.Google Scholar
Hachemeister, C. A. and J. N., Stanard (1975). IBNR claims count estimation with static lag functions. Spring Meeting of the Casualty Actuarial Society.
Harnek, R. F. (1966). Formula loss reserves. Insurance Accounting and Statistical Association Proceedings.
Hastie, T. and R., Tibshirani (1990). Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, J. D. and R. L., Prentice (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Mack, T. (1993). Distribution-free calculation of the standard error of chain ladder reserve estimates. ASTIN Bulletin 23, 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, G. (2007). Individual claim modelling of CTP data. Institute of Actuaries of Australia XIth Accident Compensation Seminar, Melbourne, Australia. http://www.actuaries.asn.au/Library/6.a\_ACS07\_paper\_McGuire\_Individual\%20claim\%20modellingof\%20CTP\%20data.pdf.Google Scholar
O'Dowd, C., A., Smith, and P., Hardy (2005). A framework for estimating uncertainty in insurance claims cost. Proceedings of the 15th General Insurance Seminar. Institute of Actuaries of Australia. http://www.actuaries.asn.au/Library/gipaper\_odowd-smith-hardy0510.pdf.Google Scholar
Reid, D. H. (1978). Claims reserves in general insurance. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries 105, 211–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. C. (1986). Claim Reserving in Non-Life Insurance. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. C. (2000). Loss Reserving – An Actuarial Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. C. (2011). Maximum likelihood and estimation efficiency of the chain ladder. ASTIN Bulletin 41(1), 131–155.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. and M., Campbell (2002). Statistical case estimation. Research Paper No 104 of the Centre for Actuarial Studies, University of Melbourne. http://www.economics.unimelb.edu.au/ACT/html/no104.pdf.
Taylor, G. and G., McGuire (2004). Loss reserving with GLMs: a case study. Casualty Actuarial Society 2004 Discussion Paper Program, 327–392.Google Scholar
Taylor, G., G., McGuire, and J., Sullivan (2006). Individual claim loss reserving conditioned by case estimates. Research Paper Commissioned by the Institute of Actuaries. http://www.actuaries.org.uk/research-and-resources/documents/individual-claim-loss-reserving-conditionedcase-estimates.
Verrall, R. J. (1996). Claims reserving and generalised additive models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 19(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
Verrall, R. J. (2000). An investigation into stochastic claims reserving models and the chain-ladder technique. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 26, 91–99.Google Scholar
Wüthrich, M. V. and M., Merz (2008). Stochastic Claims Reserving Methods in Insurance. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×