Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T11:14:37.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Comparison observation-theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

V. Dehant
Affiliation:
Royal Observatory of Belgium
Get access

Summary

Empirical models for nutations (such as IERS96)

In order to be very close to the nutation observation, one possibility is to consider a model with a very simple form and of which the parameters can be fitted on the observation. In that case, ignoring the a-priori corrections that are explained in the next paragraph, the parameters cannot be interpreted in terms of the physics of the Earth's interior. This empirical model cannot be considered as a geophysical model.

Estimation of basic Earth parameters from VLBI

We have seen in Chapter 5 that the rigid Earth nutations are quite well determined, with the exception of a scaling factor for the global Earth flattening. The precession and low frequency nutations due to the action of the degree two tesseral gravitational potential of the solar system bodies at the first order in the potential may be calculated to high accuracy as shown in that chapter.

Other contributions to Earth rotation with frequencies outside the low frequency band, in the celestial frame are produced by the other components of the potential. They have been computed in Chapter 10 and are outside of the scope of a fit to VLBI (Very Long Baseline Interferometry) data as they contribute to polar motions of the CIP and are not considered as nutations of the CIP. However, we must consider (1) the contributions of the order of 0.1 mas or smaller to a couple of low frequency nutations from the degree three tidal potential acting on J3, and about 25 µas/year to precession from the degree four potential acting on J4 (see Chapter 5). We must also consider (2) contributions of the second order in the perturbing potential, which arise from the action of each of the three parts (zonal, tesseral, and sectorial) of the potential on the increment to the density function that is produced by the tidal deformation induced by these three parts. They have been evaluated in Chapter 10 where it was shown that the effect on precession–nutation is practically nil because of mutual cancellations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×