Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T22:41:24.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2022

David Mortimer
Oozoa Biomedical Inc., Vancouver
Lars Björndahl
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
Christopher L. R. Barratt
University of Dundee
José Antonio Castilla
HU Virgen de las Nieves, Granada
Roelof Menkveld
Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Ulrik Kvist
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
Juan G. Alvarez
Centro ANDROGEN, La Coruña
Trine B. Haugen
Oslo Metropolitan University
Get access
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Solberg, HE. Establishment and use of reference values. In: Burtis, CA, ed. Tietz Textboook of Clinical Chemistry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1999, 336–56.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 6th edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.Google Scholar
Heuchel, V, Schwartz, D, Price, W. Within-subject variability and the importance of abstinence period for sperm count, semen volume and pre-freeze and post-thaw motility. Andrologia 1981; 13: 479–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, C, et al. Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2082–8.Google Scholar
Menkveld, R, et al. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 586–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, D, Menkveld, R. Sperm morphology assessment–historical perspectives and current opinions. J Androl 2001; 22: 192205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Zyl, JA, Kotze, TJ, Menkveld, R. Predictive value of spermatozoa morphology in natural fertilization. In: Acosta, AA, et al., ed. Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction. Baltimore: William & Wilkins, 1990, 319–24.Google Scholar
Menkveld, R. The influence of environment factors on spermatogenesis and semen parameters. PhD Thesis. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch, 1987.Google Scholar
Eliasson, R. Semen analysis and laboratory workup. In: Cockett, ATK, Urry, RL, eds. Male Infertility. Workup, Treatment and Research. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1977, 169–88.Google Scholar
Eliasson, R. Analysis of semen. In: Burger, HG, De Kretser, DM, eds. The Testis. New York: Raven Press, 1981, 381–99.Google Scholar
Mortimer, D, Templeton, AA, Lenton, EA, Coleman, RA. Influence of abstinence and ejaculation-to-analysis delay on semen analysis parameters of suspected infertile men. Arch Androl 1982; 8: 251–6.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interactions, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interactions, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interactions, 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bostofte, E, Serup, J, Rebbe, H. Interrelations among the characteristics of human semen, and a new system for classification of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1984; 41: 95102.Google Scholar
Mortimer, D. The Male Factor in Infertility. Part I: Semen Analysis. Current Problems in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Fertility VIII. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc, 1985.Google Scholar
Mortimer, D. Practical Laboratory Andrology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björndahl, L, et al. A Practical Guide to Basic Laboratory Andrology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzick, DS, et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. New England J Med 2001; 345: 1388–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, D, Templeton, AA, Lenton, EA, Coleman, RA. Semen analysis parameters and their interrelationships in suspected infertile men. Arch Androl 1982; 8: 165–71.Google Scholar
Pelzman, DL, Hwang, K. Genetic testing for men with infertility: techniques and indications. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10: 1354–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, D, Mortimer, ST. The case against intracytoplasmic sperm injection for all. In: Aitken, RJ, Mortimer, D, Kovacs, G, eds. Male and Female Factors that Maximize IVF Success. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Barratt, CLR, De Jonge, CJ, Sharpe, RM. ‘Man Up’: the importance and strategy for placing male reproductive health centre stage in the political and research agenda. Hum Reprod 2018, 33: 541–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ. Not every sperm is sacred: a perspective on male infertility. Mol Hum Reprod 2018; 24: 287–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Cairo Consensus Workshop Group. The current status and future of andrology: a consensus report from the Cairo workshop group. Andrology 2020; 8: 2752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, CLR, Björndahl, L, De Jonge, CJ, et al. The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance – challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23: 660–80.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.Google Scholar
Cooper, TG, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16: 231–45.Google Scholar
Campbell, MJ, et al. Distribution of semen examination results 2020 – A follow up of data collated for the WHO semen analysis manual 2010. Andrology 2021; 9: 817–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35: 494510; Hum Reprod Open 2017; hox011. Scholar
Jouannet, P, Ducot, B, Feneux, D, Spira, A. Male factors and the likelihood of pregnancy in infertile couples. I. Study of sperm characteristics. Int J Androl 1988; 11: 379–94.Google Scholar
Smith, JC, et al. Fatherhood without apparent spermatozoa after vasectomy. Lancet 1994; 344: 30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keihani, S, et al. Semen parameter thresholds and time-to-conception in subfertile couples: how high is high enough? Hum Reprod 2021; 36: 2121–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Björndahl, L, Barratt, CL, Mortimer, D, Jouannet, P.How to count sperm properly’: checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis. Hum Reprod 2016; 31: 227–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, D, Pandya, IJ, Sawers, RS. Relationship between human sperm motility characteristics and sperm penetration into human cervical mucus in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 78: 93102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ, Warner, PE, Reid, C. Factors influencing the success of sperm-cervical mucus interaction in patients exhibiting unexplained infertility. J Androl 1986; 7: 310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, ST. A critical review of the physiological importance and analysis of sperm movement in mammals. Hum Reprod Update 1997; 3: 403–39.Google Scholar
Barratt, CLR, Osborn, JC, Harrison, PE, et al. The hypo-osmotic swelling test and the sperm mucus penetration test in determining fertilization of the human oocyte. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 430–4.Google Scholar
Berberoglugil, P, et al. Abnormal sperm-mucus penetration test predicts low in vitro fertilization ability of apparently normal semen. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 1228–32.Google Scholar
Mortimer, D. Sperm form and function: beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In: Van der Horst, G, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Spermatology. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore SpA, 2002, 257–62.Google Scholar
Rowe, PJ, et al. WHO Manual for the Standardized Investigation, Diagnosis and Management of the Infertile Male. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Menkveld, R, et al. Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. Guidelines on the application of CASA technology in the analysis of spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 142–5.Google Scholar
Mortimer, ST, van der Horst, G, Mortimer, D. The future of computer-aided sperm analysis. Asian J Androl 2015; 17: 545–53.Google Scholar
Mortimer, D, Mortimer, ST. Routine application of CASA in human clinical andrology and ART laboratories. In: Björndahl, L, Flanagan, J, Holmberg, R, Kvist, U, eds. XIIIth International Symposium on Spermatology. Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2021, 183–97.Google Scholar
Menkveld, R, et al. Detection of sperm antibodies on unwashed spermatozoa with the immunobead test: a comparison of results with the routine method and seminal plasma TAT titers and SCMC test. Am J Reprod Immunol 1991; 25: 8891.Google Scholar
Björndahl, L, et al. When is a vasectomy successful? Laboratory aspects. Andrology 2019; 7 (Sup 1): 96–7.Google Scholar
ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. Consensus workshop on advanced diagnostic andrology techniques. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1463–79.Google Scholar
Evenson, DP, Wixon, R. Data analysis of two in vivo fertility studies using sperm chromatin structure assay-derived DNA fragmentation index vs. pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 1229–31.Google Scholar
Evenson, D. Damage, DNA: sperm chromatin structure assay. Sperm chromatin structure assay test on its fortieth anniversary. In: Agarwal, A, Henkel, R, Majzoub, A, eds. Manual of Sperm Function Testing in Human Assisted Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 192201.Google Scholar
Alvarez, JG. The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2365–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed


Björndahl, L, Kirkman-Brown, J, Hart, G, et al. Development of a novel home sperm test. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 145–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheon, WH, Park, HJ, Park, MJ, et al. Validation of a smartphone-based, computer-assisted sperm analysis system compared with laboratory-based manual microscopic semen analysis and computer-assisted semen analysis. Invest Clin Urol 2019; 60: 380–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppola, MA, Klotz, KL, Kim, KA, et al. SpermCheck® Fertility: an immunodiagnostic home test that detects normozoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 853–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castello, D, Garcia-Laez, V, Buyru, F, et al. Comparison of the SwimCount home diagnostic test with conventional sperm analysis. Adv Androl Gynecol 2018; 1: 18.Google Scholar
Yoon, YE, Kim, TY, Shin, TE, et al. Validation of SwimCountTM, a novel home-based device that detects progressively motile spermatozoa: correlation with World Health Organization 5th Semen Analysis. World J Men’s Health 2020; 38: 191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaff, UY, Fredriksen, LL, Epperson, JG, et al. Novel centrifugal technology for measuring sperm concentration in the home. Fertil Steril 2017; 107: 358–64.Google Scholar
Kobori, Y, Pfanner, P, Prins, GS, Niederberger, C. Novel device for male infertility screening with single-ball lens microscope and smartphone. Fertil Steril 2016; 106: 574–8.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Panner Selvam, MK, Sharma, R, et al. Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration. Fertil Steril 2018; 110: 1277–84.Google Scholar


Kvist, U, Björndahl, L, eds. Manual on Basic Semen Analysis. ESHRE Monographs 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 6th edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 23162:2021 Basic Semen Examination – Specification and Test Methods. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2021.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats