Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-05T11:27:29.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Margit Tavits
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, Ronni, Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Easton, Malcolm, Ezrow, Lawrence, Kosmidis, Spyros, and Neundorf, Anja. 2013. “When Does Valence Matter? Heightened Valence Effects for Governing Parties during Election Campaigns.” Party Politics 19(1): 61–82.CrossRef
Aczél, Endre. 2001. “Hatezer leütés az MSZP-ről.” NOL, April 30. .
Adams, James, Merrill, Samuel, and Grofman, Bernard. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Advertiser. 1990. “Reds Stay Quiet amid Czech Poll Rhetoric.” June 9.
Ágh, Attila. 1991. “A felemás fordulat éve.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1990-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Ágh, Attila. 1995. “The Experiences of the First Democratic Parliaments in East Central Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 28(2): 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ágh, Attila. 1997. “Defeat and Success as Promoters of Party Change: The Hungarian Socialist Party after Two Abrupt Changes.” Party Politics 3(3): 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ágh, Attila. 1998. “The Year of Early Consolidation.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1997-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Ágh, Attila. 2000. “Party Formation Process and the 1998 Elections in Hungary: Defeat as Promoter of Change for the HSP.” East European Politics & Societies 14: 288–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ágh, Attila. 2002. “The Dual Challenge and the Reform of the Hungarian Socialist Party.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 35(3): 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlquist, John S. and Margaret, Levi. 2011. “Leadership: What It Means, What It Does, and What We Want to Know About It.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alaküla, Allan. 1995. “Isamaa ja ERSP uus maine.” Postimees, December 1.
Alaküla, Allan. 1996. “Välja visatakse ainult tugevatest parteidest.” Postimees, September 14.
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammas, Anneli. 2004. “Villu anektoodid ehk maapoliitiku kavalantsulik pale.” EPL, October 9.
Amorim Neto, Octavio and Santos, Fabiano. 2001. “The Executive Connection: Presidentially Defined Factions and Party Discipline in Brazil.” Party Politics 7(2): 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Edmund L. 2001. “Former Communist Who Led Left to Victory in Poland.” New York Times, September 24.
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Snyder, James M.. 2000. “Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models.” Public Choice 103: 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleton, Andrew M. and Ward, Daniel S.. 1994. “Measuring Party Organization in the United States.” Party Politics 1(1): 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott and de Mesquita, Ethan Bueno. 2008. “Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage.” Journal of Politics 70(4): 1006–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astley, Graham W. and Sachdeva, Paramjit S.. 1984. “Structural Sources of Intraorganizational Power: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Academy of Management Review 9(1): 104–113.Google Scholar
Bakke, Elisabeth and Nick, Sitter. 2005. “Patterns of Stability: Party Competition and Strategy in Central Europe since 1989.” Party Politics 11(2): 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balázs, Magdolina and Enyedi, Zsolt. 1996. “Hungarian Case Studies: The Alliance of Free Democrats and Alliance of Young Democrats.” In Party Structure and Organization in East-Central Europe, ed. Lewis, P. G.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Pp. 43–65.Google Scholar
Balbat, Maris. 2004. “Tarkus ei tähenda süüdistamist, vaid mõistmist.” Elukiri, September 21.
Bartolini, Stefano. 2000. The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basedau, Matthias and Stroh, Alexander. 2008. “Measuring Party Institutionalization in Developed Countries: A New Research Instrument Applied to 28 African Political Parties.” GIGA Working Paper No. 69.
Bass, Bernard M. 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Battiata, Mary. 1991. “Prague Finance Minister: Economist with Fan Club.” The Washington Post, April 18.
BBC Monitoring Europe. 1998. “Poland: Government Coalition Junior Partner Claims to Be Largest Party.” March 1.
BBC Monitoring Europe. 1999. “Poland: Left Party Congress Ends on Upbeat Note.” December 19.
BBC Monitoring Europe. 2001. “Poland: New Political Initiative Not to Form Own Local Government Structures.” January 23.
BBC Monitoring Europe. 2005. “Polish Weekly Says Ruling Party's New Leaders Mean ‘Trouble’ for Other Parties.” June 1.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 1990. “Czech Communist Party Assesses Election Result.” June 20.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 1992. “Smallholders in Leadership Deadlock after Claims of Putsch against Torgyan.” June 16.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 1994a. “Communist Party Chief Pleased with Results.” November 22.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 1994b. “Klaus: Goal for 1995 Is to Expand Party Membership Base.” December 20.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 1998a. “Labour Union Must Stay Sovereign, Leadership Candidate Says.” February 26.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 1998b. “Coalition Partner Discusses ‘Lower Than Expected’ Election Result.” October 20.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 2000. “Left-Wing Leaders Sign Electoral Alliance.” December 19.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 2002a. “Polish Newspaper Outlines Background to Potential Split in Right-Wing Party.” April 23.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 2002b. “Polish Daily Reports New Conflict in Right-Wing Party.” May 13.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 2002c. “Polish Centre-Right Party Elects New Caucus Leader.” December 19.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 2003. “Former Leader of Polish Centre Party Resigns Membership.” May 30.
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 2004. “New Leader of Polish Agrarian Party to Seek Centre Position, Wide Coalitions.” March 16.
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1260–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélafi, Antal, 2003. A Kisgazdapárt újjászervezésének programja. Budapest: Független Kisgazda-, Földmunkás és Polgári Párt. .php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=3.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth and Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benkő, Péter. 2002. “A Független Kisgazdapárt.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2001-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Bielasiak, Jack. 1997. “Substance and Process in the Development of Party Systems in East Central Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30(1): 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielasiak, Jack. 2002. “The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States.” Comparative Politics 34(2): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bihari, Mihály. 1991. “Rendszerváltás és hatalomváltás Magyarországon (1989–1990).” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1990-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2003. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Jerome H. 1984. “Revising the Effects of Canvassing Behaviour.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 17(2): 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blahoz, Josef. 1994. “Political Parties in the Czech and Slovak Federal Republics: First Steps toward the Rebirth of Democracy.” In How Political Parties Work: Perspectives from Within, ed. Lawson, Kay. Westport: Praeger. Pp. 229–248.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Dobrzynska, Agnieszka, Nevitte, Neal, and Nadeau, Richard. 2003. “Does the Local Candidate Matter?Canadian Journal of Political Science 36: 657–664.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2007. “The Emergence of Parties and Party Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, eds. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 499–521.Google Scholar
Borger, Julian. 1993. “Smooth Talker's Rule May Be Very Brief.” Guardian, September 21.
Bos, Stefan. 2009. “Czech Government Collapses after Losing No-Confidence Vote.” GlobalSecurity.org, March 25. .
Bowler, Shaun and Farrell, David M.. 1993. “Legislator Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislator/Voter Relationships.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(1): 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun and Farrell, David M.. 1996. “Constituency Campaigning in Parliamentary Systems with Preferential Voting: Is There a Paradox?Electoral Studies 15(4): 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M, and Katz, Richard S.. 1999. “Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, eds. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S.. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. Pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Bozóki, András. 1992. “A magyar pártok 1991-ben.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1991-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány.Google Scholar
Bozóki, András. 2003. Politikai pluralizmus Magyarországon, 1987–2002. Budapest: Századvég.Google Scholar
Bozóki, András and Lomax, Bill. 1996. “The Revenge of History: The Portuguese, Spanish and Hungarian Transitions – Some Comparisons.” In Stabilising Fragile Democracies: Comparing New Party Systems in Southern and Eastern Europe, eds. Pridham, Geoffrey and Lewis, Paul G.. London: Routledge. Pp. 186–205.Google Scholar
Bozóki, András and Simon, Eszter. 2006. “Formal Institutions and Informal Politics in Hungary.” In Formal Institutions and Informal Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Hungary, Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, ed. Meyer, Gerd. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers. Pp. 145–194.Google Scholar
Brooks, Clem. 2006. “Voters, Satisficing, and Policymaking: Recent Directions in the Study of Electoral Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 32: 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Marcelo, Nazareno, and Susan, Carol Stokes. 2004. “Vote Buying in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 39(2): 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buch Jensen, Roger. 1999. “Local Party Organisations in Denmark: Crisis or Adaptation?” in Local Parties in Political and Organisational Perspective, eds. Saiz, Martin and Geser, Hans. Oxford: Westview Press. Pp. 258–261.Google Scholar
Bueno de, Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buras, Piotr. 2005. “Polish Social Democracy, Policy Transfer and Programmatic Change.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 21(1): 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David and Kavanagh, Neil. 1974. British General Election of February 1974. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynander, Frederik and ‘t Hart, Paul. 2007. “The Politics of Party Leader Survival and Succession: Australia in Comparative Succession.” Australian Journal of Political Science 42(1): 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantu, Francisco and Desposato, Scott W.. 2009. “The New Federalism of Mexico's Party System.” University of California, San Diego. Unpublished manuscript.
Carey, John M. 2007. “Political Institutions, Competing Principals, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John M. and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., Gabel, Matthew, Murrah, Lacey, Clough, Ryan, Montgomery, Elizabeth, and Schambach, Rebecca. 2006. “Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias and Roll-Call Vote Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 36: 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 1991. Canadian Political Parties in the Constituencies. Toronto: Dundrun Press.Google Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth and Eagels, Munroe. 1999. “Do Local Campaigns Matter? Campaign Spending the Local Canvass and Party Support in Canada.” Electoral Studies 18: 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Cheibub, Antonio, Jose, Figueiredo, Argelina, and Limongi, Fernando. 2009. “Political Parties and Governors as Determinants of Legislative Behavior in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies, 1988–2006.” Latin American Politics and Society 51(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep K. 1999. Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Alistair. 2004. “The Continued Relevance of Local Parties in Representative Democracies.” Politics 24(1): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Michael. 2009. “Valence and Electoral Outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998.” Electoral Studies 28(1): 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Peter B. and Wilson, James Q.. 1961. “Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 6(2): 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Terry D., Verseckaite, Egle, and Lukosaitis, Alvidas. 2006. “The Role of Committee Systems in Post-Communist Legislatures: A Case Study of the Lithuanian Seimas.” Europe-Asia Studies 58(5): 731–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, SouleJohn, W. and James, W. 1970. “Amateurs and Professionals: A Study of Delegates to the 1968 Democratic National Convention.” American Journal of Political Science 64(4): 888–898.Google Scholar
Coleman, John J. 1996. “Party Organizational Strength and Public Support for Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 40(3): 805–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Jim. 2001. Good to Great. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Cook, Karen and Emerson, Richard. 1978. “Power, Equity, and Commitment in Exchange Networks.” American Sociological Review 43: 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Karen, Emerson, Richard, Gillmore, Mary, and Yamagishi, Toshio. 1983. “The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results.” American Journal of Sociology 89(2): 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Patriarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotter, Cornelius P., Gibson, James L., Bibby, John F., and Huckshorn, Robert J.. 1984. Party Organizations in American Politics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Courtney, John C. 1995. Do Conventions Matter? Choosing National Party Leaders in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Matthew. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C., Jones, Bradford S., Jones, Mark P., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2004. “Vote-Seeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies.” Journal of Politics 66(3): 823–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F. and Ingall, Rachel E.. 2002. “Institutional Engineering and the Nature of Representation: Mapping the Effects of Electoral Reform in Colombia.”American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 733–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William P. and Andre, Blais. 2012. Politics at the Center: The Selection and Removal of Party Leaders in the Anglo Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, William. 1971. “Party Effort and Its Impact on the Vote.” American Political Science Review 65(2): 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, Michael. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Csizmadia, Ervin. 2005. “Pártok, verseny és alkalmazkodás. Egy változáselmélet alapvonalai.” Politikatudományi Szemle 14: 5–50.Google Scholar
Ervin, Csizmadia. 2006a. “Akaratkampány.” Hetek 10(12), March 24. .Google Scholar
Csizmadia, Ervin. 2006b. “Miniszterelnökök és politkai környezet.” Politikatudományi Szemle 4(4): 5–40.Google Scholar
CTK National News Wire. 1992a. “Party Facing Split, Leader's Psychic Condition Questioned.” February 12.
CTK National News Wire. 1992b. “After One Year of Existence, Rightist Party Is the Strongest.” February 27.
CTK National News Wire. 1992c. “We Are not Czech Separatists: ODA, the Non-Revolutionary Right.” April 22.
CTK National News Wire. 1992d. “Czech Communist Party Leader Stabbed in His Apartment.” December 5.
CTK National News Wire. 1993a. “Head of Social Democrats Feels Discriminated, Wants Back to USA.” January 26.
CTK National News Wire. 1993b. “Social Democrats before Congress as Seen by Rank-and-File Member.” February 17.
CTK National News Wire. 1993c. “New CSSD Chairman Represents Radical Current.” March 1.
CTK National News Wire. 1993d. “Svoboda's Resignation Shows Communist Party Cannot Be Reformed.” March 10.
CTK National News Wire. 1993e. “Communists Keep Name, Change Chairman.” June 27.
CTK National News Wire. 1993f. “Strongest Czech Party to Hold Conference.” November 25.
CTK National News Wire. 1994a. “New Right-Wing Party Not Registered.” March 2.
CTK National News Wire. 1994b. “Number of CSSD Election Candidates Grows Three Times.” November 2.
CTK National News Wire. 1994c. “ODS Conference Made Life More Complicated for Klaus.” December 21.
CTK National News Wire. 1995a. “ODA’S Experience from Local Elections ‘Almost Banal’ Kalvoda.” March 4.
CTK National News Wire. 1995b. “Sladek Reigns with Terror among Republicans.” August 11.
CTK National News Wire. 1995c. “KSCM Promises Mass Meetings in Election Campaign.” September 2.
CTK National News Wire. 1995d. “Elections Top of Agenda.” December 9.
CTK National News Wire. 1996a. “Communists Surviving ‘Fierce Battle.’” May 11.
CTK National News Wire. 1996b. “Some SPR-RSC Members Intend to Leave Party.” June 4.
CTK National News Wire. 1997a. “KDU-CSL Owes Its Rise to Lux's Cool Mind, Consensual Policy-Pehe” February 24.
CTK National News Wire. 1997b. “Zeman Warns of Mutiny Within CSSD.” October 2.
CTK National News Wire. 1997c. “MP Hofhanzl Afraid of ODA's Collapse.” October 15.
CTK National News Wire. 1997d. “CSSD Leadership Seeking to Triple Party Membership Base.” October 10.
CTK National News Wire. 1998a. “ODA Was Politically Dead When I Became Chairman – Skalicky.” April 2.
CTK National News Wire. 1998b. “Freedom Union Hasn't Managed to Create Convincing Profile.” April 18.
CTK National News Wire. 1998c. “KSCM – Party with Most Disciplined Members and Voters.” May 14.
CTK National News Wire. 1998d. “Lidove Noviny Analyzes Freedom Union Troubles.” May 28.
CTK National News Wire. 1998e. “Freedom Union Losing Momentum after a Promising Start.” June 6.
CTK National News Wire. 1998f. “Lux Not Afraid of Intra-Party Plot.” July 17.
CTK National News Wire. 1998g. “Republican Leadership Start Purge.” July 29.
CTK National News Wire. 1998h. “Zeman Wants to Make Replacements in CSSD Local Leaderships.” September 7.
CTK National News Wire. 1999a. “KSCM's Prospects Rosy, but Should Not Be Overestimated.” May 5.
CTK National News Wire. 1999b. “Profiles of Newly Elected KSCM Deputy Chairpersons.” December 5.
CTK National News Wire. 2000. “Dissatisfaction with Zeman Growing among Social Democrats.” October 5.
CTK National News Wire. 2001. “It Is Not Enough to Preach Values, New Political Style.” June 23.
CTK National News Wire. 2002a. “Communists Are Ignored by other Parties but Show Stable Support.” March 22.
CTK National News Wire. 2002b. “No Changes to Freedom Union after Unsuccessful Elections.” November 8.
CTK National News Wire. 2002c. “Spidlas Chairmanship Weakening amid Intra-CSSD Battle.” December 10.
CTK National News Wire. 2003a. “Freedom Union-DEU Resigned to Its Fate.” January 23.
CTK National News Wire. 2003b. “ODS Organisations Happy with New Leadership.” February 18.
CTK National News Wire. 2003c. “Klaus Wins Thanks to Communists.” March 1.
CTK National News Wire. 2003d. “Presidential Elections Unveil Disputes in Czech Ruling Party.” March 3.
CTK National News Wire. 2003e. “KDU-CSL at Crossroads after Weekend Conference.” November 10.
CTK National News Wire. 2004a. “Miroslav Grebenicek Head of Communist for almost 11 Years.” May 12.
CTK National News Wire. 2004b. “Spidla Govt Ends after Two Years, Was CSSD Head for Three Years.” June 26.
CTK National News Wire. 2004c. “ODS Candidates to Use 14 Blue Buses In Election Campaign.” October 4.
CTK National News Wire. 2004d. “Gross Surprises by Resolute Words, CSSD Leftists Unprepared.” December 6.
CTK National News Wire. 2005. “US-DEU to Hold Conference in Autumn, Could Exchange Leadership.” June 19.
CTK National News Wire. 2007. “Czech KDU Exhausted from Struggle for Cunek, Has no Vision.” June 21.
CTK National News Wire. 2008a. “Czech Social Democrats Expel MP Who Voted to Reelect Incumbent President.” March 3.
CTK National News Wire. 2008b. “ODS's Schwippel Sixth Czech MP to Leave Deputy Group since Polls.” September 17.
CTK National News Wire. 2008c. “Rakovnická ODS Tlustého nevyloučila, vedení se nevzdává.” September 22.
CTK National News Wire. 2009a. “O osudu Tlustého a Schwippela v ODS se bude jednat příští týden.” March 24.
CTK National News Wire. 2009b. “Czech Coalition to Expel MPs for Voting to Sack Cabinet.” March 26.
CTK National News Wire. 2009c. “Rada ODS žádá o vyloučení Tlustého a Schwippela.” March 26.
CTK National News Wire. 2009d. “Schwippel v ODS zůstává. Zatím.” March 31.
Curry, Jane Leftwich. 2003. “Poland's Ex-Communists: From Pariahs to Establishment Party.” In The Left Transformed in Post-Communist Societies, eds. Curry, Jane Leftwich, and Urban, Joan Barth. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. Pp. 19–60.Google Scholar
Curry, Jane Leftwich and Urban, Joan Barth. 2003. The Left Transformed in Post-Communist Societies. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Curry, Tom. 2008. “Why Obama Won and What His Win Gets Him.” msnbc.com. January 26. /id/22859254/ns/politics-decision_08/t/why-obama-won-what-his-win-gets-him/#.UO-Lr7b8Pco.
Cutright, Phillips. 1963. “Measuring the Impact of Local Party Activity on the General Election Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27(3): 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czech News Agency. 1999. “KDU-CSL Recording Decrease of Members.” May 21.
Czech News Agency. 2000. “Kasal Repeals Rebels’ Attack.” March 20.
Czech News Agency. 2002. “KDU-CSL May Change from ‘Quiet Force’ to Razor-Sharp Party.” January 25.
Czech News Agency. 2003. “CSSD in Chaos, Unpredictable without Zema's Firm Authority.” February 21.
Czech News Agency. 2004a. “Communists Might Become ‘Leading Force’ of Czech Left.” February 10.
Czech News Agency. 2004b. “Most District Organisations Want Grebenicek as KSCM Head.” March 8.
Czech News Agency. 2005a. “Outgoing CSSD Head Gross Leaves High Politics after 15 Years.” September 24.
Czech News Agency. 2005b. “Communist Party Is Quietly Changing.” October 20.
Czech News Agency. 2005c. “Communists to Spend 22 Million Crowns on 2006 Election Campaign.” November 19.
Czech News Agency. 2006a. “Disappointed KSCM Considering Changes in Leadership.” June 3.
Czech News Agency. 2006b. “Vojtech Filip Leads Communists to Election for First Time.” June 4.
Czech News Agency. 2006c. “KDU-CSL Should Seek Ways to Prevent Its Further Decline.” June 7.
Czech News Agency. 2006d. “CSSD Wants to Change Party's Image, Increase Membership.” August 31.
Czech News Agency. 2006e. “CSSD Presidium Chooses Havlicek for Party Chief Manager.” September 8.
Czech News Agency. 2006f. “Paroubek Admits CSSD May Stay in Opposition for Years.” September 9.
Czech News Agency. 2006g. “Basic Data about Civic Democrats.” November 14.
Czech News Agency. 2008. “Czech KDU-CSL Leader Says Some Forces Want to Destroy His Party.” January 7.
Czech News Agency. 2009a. “Populism Prevails in Czech CSSD Under Duo Paroubek-Rath.” February 6.
Czech News Agency. 2009b. “Paroubek Rules Czech Social Democrats without Any Challenger.” March 17.
Dahlberg, Matz and Johansson, Eva. 2002. “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, James W. 1998. Leadership Selection in Six Western Democracies. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Debreczeni, József. 1998. A miniszterelnök. Antall József és a rendszerváltozás. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
Debreczeni, József. 2006. Az új miniszterelnök. Budapest: Osaris Kiadó.Google Scholar
Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2006. Elected Affinities: Democracy and Party Competition in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Denver, David T. and Hands, Gordon. 1997. Modern Constituency Electioneering: Local Campaigning in the 1992 General Election. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Deschouwer, Kris. 1994. “The Decline of Consociationalism and the Reluctant Modernization of Belgian Mass Parties.” In How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, eds. Richard, S. Katz and Mair, Peter. London: Sage. Pp. 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2004. “The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2): 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2005. “Correcting for Small Group Inflation of Roll-Call Cohesion Scores.” British Journal of Political Science 35: 731–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2006. “The Impact of Electoral Rules on Legislative Parties: Lessons from the Brazilian Senate and Chamber of Deputies.” Journal of Politics 68(4): 1018–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Tamás and Gyarmati, László. 1999. “A jövő választása.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2000-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Linz, Juan J.. 1989. “Introduction: Politics, Society, and Democracy in Latin America.” In Democracy in Developing Countries, eds. Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner and London: Adamantine Press. Pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel and Feddersen, Timothy J.. 1998. “Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure.” American Political Science Review 92(3): 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, Robert H. 1992. “Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American Political Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 24(4): 488–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drabikowska, Agnieszka. 2003. “Skandal w MSWiA.” Gazeta Wyborcza, July 4.
Dudek, Antoni. 2008. Historia polityczna Polski 1989–2005. Krakow: Arcana.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1956. “Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review 50(1): 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1986. “The Party Activist in Detroit and Los Angeles: A Longitudinal View, 1956–1980.” In Political Parties in Local Areas, ed. Crotty, William. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. Pp. 89–119.Google Scholar
Elster, John, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K.. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, Richard M. 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review 27(1): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2005. “The Role of Agency in Cleavage Formation.” European Journal of Political Research 44(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2006. “Accounting for Organisation and Financing: A Comparison of Four Hungarian Parties.” Europe-Asia Studies 58(7): 1101–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2008. “Dataset of Hungarian Political Parties.” Budapest: Central European University.
Enyedi, Zsolt and Linek, Lukáš. 2008. “Searching for the Right Organization: Ideology and Party Structure in East-Central Europe.” Party Politics 14(4): 455–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EPL. 2001a. “Siimanni harakiri.” November 7.
EPL. 2001b. “Miks Koonderakond kokku varises?” November 19.
EPL. 2001c. “Noored mässajad asutavad erakonna.” December 8.
Epperly, Brad. 2011. “Institutions and Legacies: Electoral Volatility in the Postcommunist World.” Comparative Political Studies 44(7): 829–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernits, Peeter. 2004a. “Ülo Vooglaid: Res Publical puudub kompass.” Postimees, February 27.
Ernits, Peeter. 2004b. “Äraostmatute juhtimisel on Res Publica jõudnud kurnavasse kodusõtta.” Postimees, June 21.
EU Business. 2008. “Poland, Slovakia, Embrace EU's Lisbon Treaty.” April 10.
Evans, Geoffrey. 2006. “The Social Bases of Political Divisions in Post-Communist Eastern Europe.” Annual Review of Sociology 32: 245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey and Whitefield, Stephen. 1993. “Identifying the Bases of Party Competition in Eastern Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 23: 521–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey and Whitefield, Stephen. 1995. “Social and Ideological Cleavage Formation in Post-Communist Hungary.” Europe-Asia Studies 47(7): 1177–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey and Whitefield, Stephen. 1998. “The Structuring of Political Cleavages in Post-Communist Societies: The Case of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Political Studies 46(1): 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezrow, Lawrence. 2008. “Parties’ Policy Programmes and the Dog that Didn't Bark: No Evidence that Proportional Systems Promote Extreme Party Positioning.” British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Brown.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy. 2005. Culture War? New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 1987. “The Intraorganizational Power Struggle: Rise of Finance Personnel to Top Leadership in Large Corporations, 1919–1979.” American Sociological Review 52(1): 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Földvári, Katalin. 2001. “Őszinte a Fidesz konzervativizmusa.” Hetek 5(19), May 12. .Google Scholar
Fowler, Brigid. 2004. “Concentrated Orange: Fidesz and the Remaking of the Hungarian Centre-Right, 1994–2002.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20(3): 80–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H. and Laver, Michael. “A Tournament of Party Decision Rules.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(1): 68–92.CrossRef
Frendreis, John P., Gibson, James L., and Vertz, Laura L. 1990. “The Electoral Relevance of Local Party Organizations.” American Political Science Review 84(1): 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gajewski, Jaroslaw. 2003. “Polish Peasant Party Politicians Call on Chairman Kalinowski to Resign.” World News Connection, September 15.
Gallagher, Michael. 1985. “Social Backgrounds and Local Orientations of Members of the Irish Dail.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavra, Gábor. 2004. “Lezáruló tisztogatás a Fideszben: Minden szinten szinte mind megy.” MaNcs 16(13), March 25. /index.php?gcPage=/public/hirek/hir.php&id=9941.Google Scholar
Gazeta, pl. 2011. “Partie w Polsce. Historia.” September 14. ,118273,10278431,Partie_w_Polsce__Historia__INFOGRAFIKA_.html.
Gazeta, Wyborcza. 2004. “Kulisy afery Orlenu – raport Giertycha.” December 13.
Gazsó, Ferenc and Stumpf, István. 1997. “Pártok és szavazóbázisok.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1996-ról, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and McKeown, Timothy J.. 1985. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making.” In Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, eds. Coulam, Robert F. and Smith, Richard A.. Greenwich: JAI Press. Pp. 21–58.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Green, Donald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 94(3): 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geser, Hans. 1999. “The Local Party as an Object of Interdisciplinary Comparative Study: Some Steps Toward Theoretical Integration.” In Local Parties in Political and Organizational Perspective, eds. Saiz, Martin and Geser, Hans. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
Giannetti, Daniela and Laver, Michael. 2001. “Party System Dynamics and the Making and Breaking of Italian Governments.” Electoral Studies 20(4): 529–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Cotter, Cornelius P., and Bibby, John F.. 1983. “Assessing Party Organizational Strength.” American Journal of Political Science 27(2): 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Cotter, Cornelius P., Bibby, John F., and Huckshorn, Robert J.. 1985. “Whither the Political Parties?: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of the Strength of Party Organizations.” American Journal of Political Science 29(1): 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Frendreis, John B., and Vertz, Laura L.. 1989. “Party Dynamics in the 1980s: Change in County Party Organizational Strength, 1980–1984.” American Journal of Political Science 33(1): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2010. “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Process?American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giró-Szász, András, Héjj, Dávid, Kern, Tamás, and Schultz, Gábor. 2008. “A Fidesz-MPP 2007-es helyzete.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2007-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Giró-Szász, András, Héjj, Dávid and Kisgyőri, Roland. 2007. “A Fidesz-MPSZ változása 2006-ban.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2006-ról, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Golosov, Grigorii V. 1998. “Who Survives?: Party Origins, Organizational Development, and Electoral Performance in Post-Communist Russia.” Political Studies 46:511–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golosov, Grigorii V. 2004. Political Parties in the Regions of Russia: Democracy Unclaimed. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Steven. 1990. “Upheaval in the East: Poland.” New York Times, January 30.
Groseclose, Timothy J. 2001. “A Model of Candidate Location: When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna M. 2002a. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna M. 2002b. “The Effects of Communist Party Transformation on the Institutionalization of Party Systems.” In Bozóki, András and Ishiyama, John (Eds.) Communist Successor Parties a Decade After: Reform or Transmutation?New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna M. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, Richard and Hopkin, Jonathan. 2002. “A Crisis of Institutionalization: The Collapse of the UCD in Spain.” In Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, eds. Gunther, Richard, Montero, José Ramon, and Linz, Juan J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 191–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, Richard, Montero, Jose Ramon, and Linz, Juan J., eds. 2002. Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjiiski, Magdalena. 2001. “The Failure of the Participatory Democracy in the Czech Republic.” West European Politics 24(3): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagelberg, Tõnu. 2000. “Suure keskpartei sünd.” Maaleht, June 15.
Hajdú, Sándor. 2006. “Nagyobb gázzal.” Hetek 10(1), January 6. .Google Scholar
Hajdú, Sándor and Szobota, Zoltán. 2007. “Bebetonozott érdekek.” Hetek 11(12), March 23. .Google Scholar
Handl, Vladimir. 2005a. “Choosing Between China and Europe? Virtual Inspiration and Policy Transfer in the Programmatic Development of the Czech Communist Party.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 21(1): 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handl, Vladimír. 2005b. “The Development and the Prospects of the Czech Left: The Role of the Communist Party.” Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Working Paper 12/2005.
Hanley, Sean. 2001. “Towards Breakthrough or Breakdown?: The Consolidation of KSČM as a Neo-Communist Successor Party in the Czech Republic.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 17(3): 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Sean. 2003. “Are the Exceptions Really the Rule?: Questioning the Application of ‘Electoral-Professional’ Type Models of Party Organization in East Central Europe.” In Pan-European Perspectives on Party Politics, eds. Lewis, Paul and Webb, Paul. Leiden: Brill. Pp. 151–77.Google Scholar
Hanley, Sean. 2004. “Blue Velvet: The Rise and Decline of the New Czech Right.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20(3): 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Sean. 2008. The New Right in the New Europe: Czech Transformation and Right-Wing Politics, 1989–2006. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hannan, Michael T. and Freeman, John. 1984. “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmel, Robert and Janda, Kenneth. 1982. Parties and Their Environment: Limits to Reform?London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Harmel, Robert and Janda, Kenneth. 1994. “An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(3): 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspel, Moshe, Remington, Thomas D., and Smith, Steven. 1998. “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma.” Journal of Politics 60: 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y. 1999. “Constituency Interests without Constituencies: The Geographical Impact of Candidate Selection on Party Organization and Legislative Behavior in the 14th Israeli Knesset, 1996–1999.” Political Geography 18: 791–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y. 2003. “Does Cohesion Equal Discipline?: Towards a Conceptual Delineation.” Journal of Legislative Studies 9(4): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1986. “Do Parties Make a Difference?: The Role of Party Organizations in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 48(3): 589–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, Erik. 2002. “Electoral Influences on Legislative Behavior in Mixed-Member Systems: Evidence from the Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27: 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Hetek. 1998a. “Hajsza a cédulákért.” March 14. .
, Hetek. 1998b. “Torgyánt nem lehet kihagyni.” May 16. .
, Hetek. 1998c. “Tovább marakodnak a kereszténydemokraták.” September 5. .
Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, C. A., Schneck, R. E., and Pennings, T. M.. 1971. “A Strategic Contingencies’ Theory of Intraorganizational Power.” Administrative Science Quarterly 16(2): 216–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiiesalu, Hanna, Naber, Lauri, Nõukas, Alvar, Poom, Tõnis, and Tender, Karl-Erik. 2002. “Mõõdukad.” Department of Political Science, University of Tartu. .
Hinings, C. R., Hickson, David J., Pennings, Johannes M., and Schneck, R. E.. 1974. “Structural Conditions of Intraorganizational Power.” Administrative Science Quarterly 19(1): 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” World Politics 56(2): 194–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gerard. 2005. “Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001.” British Journal of Political Science 35(2): 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffstetter, C. Richard. 1971. “The Amateur Politician: A Problem in a Construct Validation.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15(1): 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. and Tidmarch, Charles M.. 1993. “The Effects of Leadership Positions on Votes for Incumbents in State Legislative Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 46(4): 897–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, Martin. 1998. “Republicans Lick Their Wounds in Private.” Prague Post, July 1.
Horn, Gyula. 1999. Azok a 90-es évekBudapest: Kossuth.Google Scholar
House, Robert J. 1977. “A 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership.” In Leadership: The Cutting Edge, eds. Hunt, James G. and Larson, Lars L.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Pp. 189–204.Google Scholar
Huang, Mel. 1999. “A Deflating Election Experience.” Central European Review, October 20.
Huckfeldt, Robert and Sprague, John. 1992. “Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass.” American Political Science Review 86(1): 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckshorn, Robert J., Gibson, James L., Cotter, Cornelius P., and Bibby, John F.. 1986. “Party Integration and Party Organizational Strength.” Journal of Politics 48(4): 976–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, Masters, William A., and Sandbu, Martin E.. 2006. “The Role of Leaders in Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe.” World Politics 58(4): 583–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungary Around the Clock. 2008. “Two Socialist MPs to Defy Party Whip Over Health Care Bill.” Hungary Around the Clock, February 6.
Hüvato, Mari-Liis. 2005. “Rahavliit tugevdab Tartumaal positsioone.” Postimees, September 26.
HVG. 2004a. “Hiller István lesz az MSZP új elnöke?” June 17. .
HVG. 2004b. “Pártelnökválasztás: esélyek nyugtalansága.” July 22. .
HVG. 2005. “A Fidesz sms-ben kér tanácsot a választóktól.” February 5. .
HVG. 2006. “Országos listás pártok.” March 22. .
HVG. 2009. “Pető: ‘Retkes hülyeségeket beszél.” July 14. .
Ideon, Argo. 1999a. “Reformierakond jätkab Siim Kallase käe all.” Postimees, May 17.
Ideon, Argo. 1999b. “Keskerakondlased hakkavad oma valijaid üles kirjtuama.” Postimees, October 6.
Ideon, Argo. 1999c. “Rahvaerakond Mõõdukad lubab seista töövõtjate ja maainimeste huvide eest.” Postimees, November 29.
Ideon, Argo. 2000a. “Keskerakond hääletas kongressil muutused maha.” Postimees, February 21.
Ideon, Argo. 2000b. “Koonderakond valib lõpu ja üritamise vahel.” Postimees, March 21.
Ideon, Argo. 2000c. “Keskerakond värbab tuhatkond liiget.” Postimees, May 16.
Ideon, Argo. 2001. “Olari Taal: Res Publica juht saab peaministriks.” Postimees, December 10.
Ideon, Argo. 2002. “Parteide kampaaniategemise võhm sõltub rahast, ajast ja inimestest.” Postimees, September 9.
Ideon, Argo. 2009a. “Keskerakond lööb võistlejaid valimiste põhjaliku eeltööga.” Postimees, October 10.
Ideon, Argo. 2009b. “Savisaar ja vene valijate hääled.” Postimees, October 27.
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 1994. “Parliament and Parliamentarians in Hungary: A Comparative Perspective.” In The First Steps, eds. Agh, Attila and Kurtan, Sandor. Budapest: Center for Democratic Studies. Pp. 237–251.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 1999. “Legislative Recruitment: Personnel and Institutional Development in Hungary, 1990–1994.” In Elections to the Hungarian National Assembly 1994: Analysis, Documents and Data, eds. Toká, Gábor and Enyedi, Zsolt. Berlin: Sigma. Pp. 82–107.Google Scholar
Index. 2001. “‘A Fidesz és az MSZP egymást erősíti.’” January 30. .
Index. 2004. “Kovácstalanság.” Index.hu, October 18. .
Innes, Abby. 2002. “Party Competition in Postcommunist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery.” Comparative Politics 35(1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, John T. 2001. “Party Organization and the Political Success of the Communist Parties.” Social Science Quarterly 82(4): 844–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1994. “Political Leadership and Representation in West European Democracies: A Test of Three Models of Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakl, Rene. 1998. “ODS Heals from Scandals as Right Rivals Fail to Thrill.” Prague Post, June 3.
Jakus, Ibolya. 2005. “A vizsgálat lezárult. Párthétvége az államfőválasztás után.” HVG, June 15. .
Janda, Kenneth. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Kenneth. 1983. “Cross-National Measures of Party Organizations and Organizational Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 11: 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Kenneth. 1993. “Comparative Political Parties: Research and Theory.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Finifter, Ada W.. Washington, DC: APSA. Pp. 163–191.Google Scholar
Janda, Kenneth and Colman, Tyler. 1998. “Effects of Party Organization on Performance during the ‘Golden Age’ of Parties.” Political Studies 46: 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janicki, Mariusz. 1994. “Pawlak and His Party.” Polish News Bulletin, November 17.
Jarne, Aivar. 1996a. “Savisaare soolo.” Postimees, March 1.
Jarne, Aivra. 1996b. “Keskerakonna reanimatsioon.” Postimees, April 2.
Jason, Leonard A., Rose, Thomas, Ferrari, Joseph R., and Barone, Russ. 1984. “Personal versus Impersonal Methods for Recruiting Blood Donations.” Journal of Social Psychology 123: 139–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jędrzejczyk, Agnieszka. 2003. “Rok z Rywinem.” Gazeta Wyborcza, November 30.
John, Peter and Saiz, Martin. 1999. “Local Political Parties in Comparative Perspective.” In Local Parties in Political and Organizational Perspective, eds. , Martin and Saiz, Hans Geser. Boulder: Westview Press. Pp. 44–76.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ron and Pattie, Charles. 2006. Putting Voters In Their Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juhász, Attila, and Krekó, Péter. 2008. “A vezéreken túl is van politikai élet. Gyurcsány Ferenc és Orbán Viktor 2007-ben.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2007-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Juhász, Attila and Szabados, Krisztián. 2006. “A populizmus éve.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2005-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Juhász, Gábor. 2001. Pártpénzügyek. Budapest: Aula.Google Scholar
Kagge, Rasmus. 2005. “Analüütikud ennustavad Res Publicale mõõnast pääsu.” Postimees, June 6.
Kaldmaa, Urmas. 1997. “Arnold Rüütel ja Andres Varik valiti tagasi.” Postimees, January 2.
Kalmre, Vahur. 1996. “Keskerakond murendab Eesti demokraatiat.” Postimees, March 15.
Kalukin, Rafal. 2008. “Napieralski – Man of the People.” Gazeta Wyborcza, June 7–8.
Kalyvas, Stathis. 1998. “From Pulpit to Party: Party Formation and the Christian Democratic Phenomenon.” Comparative Politics 31(2): 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Christopher. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejmu, Kancelaria. 1999. Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. III Kadencja. Przewodnik. Warsaw: Wydanictwo Sejmove.Google Scholar
Sejmu, Kancelaria. 2002. Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. IV Kadencja. Przewodnik. Warsaw: Wydanictwo Sejmove.Google Scholar
Sejmu, Kancelaria. 2006. Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. V Kadencja. Przewodnik. Warsaw: Wydanictwo Sejmove.Google Scholar
Kangur, Riho. 2004. “Kandidaatide selekteerimise protsess Eesti erakondades.” BA Thesis, University of Tartu.
Karpa, Kärt. 1998. “Tiit Vähi tahab tagasi võimule.” EPL, July 27.
Katz, Daniel and Eldersveld, Samuel J.. 1961. “The Impact of Local Party Activity upon the Electorate.” Public Opinion Quarterly 25(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jonathan and King, Gary. 1999. “A Statistical Model for Multiparty Electoral Data.” American Political Science Review 93(1): 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1980. A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard and Bardi, Lucanio. 1980. “Preference Voting and Turnover in Italian Parliamentary Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 24(1): 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter, eds. 1994. How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 2009. “The Cartel Party Thesis: A Restatement.” Perspective on Politics 7(4): 753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauba, Tõnu. 2001. “Tee rahva soovidest poliitikute tegudeni.” Postimees, October 12.
Keck, Margaret. 1992. The Workers’ Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kedar, Orit. 2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 99(2): 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip and Khemani, Stuti. 2009. “When Do Legislators Pass on Pork?: The Role of Political Parties in Determining Legislator Effort.” American Political Science Review 103(1): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesing's World News Archive. .
Kenig, Ofer. 2009. “Democratization of Party Leadership Selection: Do Wider Selectorates Produce More Competitive Contests?Electoral Studies 28(2): 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyeres, Zoltán. 2001. “Hatalomra készül a MIÉP.” Hetek 5(36), September 8. .Google Scholar
Kéri, László. 1995. “A többpártrendszer – a második választás után.” In Parlamenti választások, 1994, eds. Bőhm, Antal and Szoboslai, György. Budapest: MTA PTI, Budapest. Pp. 70–84.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 49–69.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jeane J. 1976. The New Presidential Elite. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Kisgyőri, Roland. 2007. “Akik nem adták fel – kis pártok küzdelme a túlélésért.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2006-ról, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Kiss, Csilla. 2002. “From Liberalism to Conservatism: The Federation of Young Democrats in Post-Communist Hungary.” East European Politics and Societies 16: 739–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1989. “The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited.” Political Studies 37: 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 33(6/7): 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Toka, Gabor. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and McGann, Anthony J.. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Klima, Michal. 1998. “Consolidation and Stabilization of the Party System in the Czech Republic.” Political Studies 46(3): 492–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, the European Union and the OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koch, Tuuli. 2006. “Res Publica Riigikogu read hõrenevad veelgi.” Postimees, February 21.
Koch, Tuuli. 2007. “Kopsaka kaasavaraga pruut – Rahvaliit.” Postimees, November 30.
Koch, Tuuli. 2008. “Meelis Atonen: Reformierakond pole vahel populismist kaugel.” Postimees, January, 26.
Koni, Laur. 2000. “Koonderakonda ähvaradab likvideerimine.” EPL, August 25.
Kons, Tõnis. 1998. “Koonderakond krambis.” EPL, September 27.
Kopeček, Lubomír. 2005. “Comparison of Left Parties in Central Europe: Some Causes of Different Successfulness.” In Trajectories of the Left, Social Democratic and (Ex)Communist Parties in Contemporary Europe: Between Past and Future, ed. Kopecek, Lubomír. Brno: CDK a ISPO. Pp. 109–117.Google Scholar
Kopeček, Lubomír and Pšeja, Pavel. 2008. “Czech Social Democracy and Its ‘Cohabitation’ with the Communist Party: The Story of a Neglected Affair.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 41(3): 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecky, Petr. 1995. “Developing Party Organizations in East-Central Europe.” Party Politics 1(4): 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecky, Petr. 2000. “The Limits of Whips and Watchdogs: Parliamentary Parties in the Czech Republic.” In Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies, eds. Heidar, Knut and Koole, Ruud. London: Routledge. Pp. 177–194.Google Scholar
Kopecky, Petr. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22(3): 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecky, Petr. 2007. Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kopecky, Petr. 2008. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis.” In Political Parties and the State In Post-communist Europe, ed. Kopecky, Petr. London: Routledge. Pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Körösényi, András. 2006. “Gyurcsány-vezér. A magyar politika ‘prezidencialódása.’” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2005-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Kostelecky, Tomas. 2002. Political Parties after Communism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kowalczyk, Krzysztof. 2004. “Prawo i Sprawiedliwość.” In Polskie partie i ugrupowania parlamentarne, eds. Sielski, Jerzy and Kowalczyk, Krzysztof. Toruń: Adam Marshall.Google Scholar
Krysiak, Piotr. 2007. “Sprzątanie po Kwaśniewskim.” Wprost, November 3.
Kubiak, Hieronim. 2007. “Poland's Democratic Left Alliance: Beyond Postcommunist Success.” In When Parties Prosper: The Uses of Electoral Success, eds. Lawson, Kay and Merkl, Peter H.. London: Lynne Rienner. Pp. 61–87.Google Scholar
Kubo, Märt. 1997. “Erakonnad ei kao kuhugi.” Postimees, June 9.
Kuenzi, Michelle and Lambright, Gina. 2001. “Party System Institutionalization in 30 African Countries.” Party Politics 1(3): 21–44.Google Scholar
Kuenzi, Michelle and Lambright, Gina. 2005. “Party Systems and Democratic Consolidation in Africa's Electoral Regimes.” Party Politics 4(11): 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuimet, Peeter. 2007. “Lahkuv Villu Reiljan: ‘Jäime ellu, kuigi meid taheti hävitada!’” Postimees, March 6.
Kunicova, Jana and Remington, Thomas Frederick. 2008. “Mandates, Parties, and Dissent: Effect of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Party Cohesion in the Russian State Duma, 1994–2003.” Party Politics 14(5): 555–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurski, Jaroslaw, Nowakowska, Agata, and Wielowieyska, Dominika. 1993. “Poland's Major Political Parties: An Overview.” Polish News Bulletin, June 11.
Laar, Mart. 2005. “Mart Laar: Peaminister 21.10.1992–08.11.1994; 25.03.1999–08.01.2002.” Public lecture delivered at Nord University, Tallinn, Estonia, April 27.
Lánczi, András. 2002. “Milyen a Fidesz 2001 év végén?” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2001-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Lánczi, Tamás. 2005. “Why Fidesz Lost: A Successful Government and Unsuccessful Party.” In Why We Lost, eds. Učeň, Peter and Surochak, Jan Erik. Bratislava: International Republican Institute. Pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Larsen, Ross. 1995. “Republican Party Splits Apart.” Prague Post, August 16.
Lauristin, Marju. 2010. Punane ja sinine. Tallinn: Eesti Ajalehed.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael. 1998. “Models of government formation.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael and Schofield, Norman. 1998. Multiparty Government. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1990. “Government Coalitions and Intraparty Politics.” British Journal of Political Science 20(4): 489–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Lawson, Römmele, Andrea, and Karasimeonov, Georgi. 1999. Cleavages, Parties, and Voters. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
LeBas, Adrianne. 2011. From Protest to Parties: Party-Building and Democratization in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence. 2001. “Democratizing Party Leadership Selection.” Party Politics 7(3): 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengyel, László. 2004. “Kétezer-három.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2003-ról, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Lengyel, László. 2009. “Nehéz döntések előtt a Fidesz.” HVG, September 1. .
Lenz, R.T. 1980. “Environment, Strategy, Organization Structure and Performance: Patterns in One Industry.” Strategic Management Journal 1(3): 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Maxwell, A. Cameron. 2003. Democracy without Parties?: Political Parties and Regime Change in Fujimori's Peru. Latin American Politics and Society 45(3): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey B. and King, Gary. 1999. “No Evidence on Directional versus Proximity Voting.” Political Analysis 8(1): 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Paul G. 1994. “Political Institutionalisation and Party Development in Post-Communist Poland.” Europe-Asia Studies 46(5): 779–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Paul G. 1996. Party Structure and Organization in East-Central Europe. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul G. 2000. Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul G. 2001. “Introduction: Democratization and Political Change in Post-Communist Eastern Europe.” In Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe, ed. Lewis, Paul G.. London: Frank Cass. Pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul G., Lomax, Bill, and Wightman, Gordon. 1994. “The Emergence of Multi-Party Systems in East-Central Europe: A Comparative Analysis.” In Democratization in Eastern Europe, eds. Pridham, Geoffrey and Vanhanen, Tatu. London: Routledge. Pp. 151–190.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2005. “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 99(1): 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linek, Lukáš and Enyedi, Zsolt. 2008. “Searching for the Right Organization: Ideology and Party Structure in East-Central Europe.” Party Politics 14(4): 455–477.Google Scholar
Linek, Lukáš and Pecháček, Štēpán. 2007. “Low Membership in Czech Political Parties: Party Strategy or Structural Determinants?” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 23(2): 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1994. “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited.” American Sociological Review 59(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. Toronto: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lister, Richard. 2008. “Why Barack Obama Won.” BBC News, November, 5.
Löffler, Tibor. 2006. “‘Nem vagyok Fidesz-ellenes.’” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2005-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Lőke, András. 2005. “‘A politikai osztály nem maffiaként működik.’ Interjú Kis Jánossal.” June 1, HVG. .
Lomax, Bill. 1999. “The 1998 Elections in Hungary: Third Time Lucky for the Young Democrats.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 15(2): 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenberg, Gerhard and Patterson, Samuel C.. 1979. Comparing Legislatures. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory. 1986. Comparative Democracy: Policymaking and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lukas, Tõnis. 1995. “Erakonnad on elu loomulik osa.” Postimees, December 12.
Luther, Kurt Richard and Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 2002. Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyne, Mona M. 2008. “Proffering Pork: How Party Leaders Build Party Reputations in Brazil.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac, Jerzy Slawomir. 1996. “Solidarity Election Action: What Odds?” Polish News Bulletin, August 8.
Machos, Csilla. 1999. “A magyar pártok alapszabályai és szervezeti típusai.” Politikatudományi Szemle 1: 23–45.Google Scholar
Machos, Csilla. 2000. A Magyar Parlamenti Pártok Szervezeti Felépítése (1990–1999). Budapest: Rejtjel Kiadó.Google Scholar
Made, Vahur. 1996. “Keskerakond muutuste ees.” Postimees, January 11.
Made, Vahur. 1997. “Ekspeaminister Vähi enampakkumisel.” Postimees, August 3.
Mahr, Alison and Nagle, John. 1995. “Resurrection of the Successor Parties and Democratization in East-Central Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 28(4): 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainville, Michael. 2001. “ODA Leader Sees Humor in Politics.” Prague Post, July 11.
Mainwaring, Scott. 1998. “Party Systems in the Third Wave.” Journal of Democracy 9(3): 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R.. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Majcherek, Janusz A. 2000. “Democratic Left Alliance: An Easy Victory May Spoil the Victors.” Rzeczpospolita, April 3.
Markus, György G. 1999. “Cleavages and Parties in Hungary after 1989.” In Cleavages, Parties, and Voters, eds. Lawson, Kay, Römmele, Andrea, and Karasimeonov, Georgi. Westport: Praeger. Pp. 141–158.Google Scholar
Marsh, Michael. 1987. “Electoral Evaluations of Candidates in Irish General Elections 1948–1982.” Irish Political Studies 2(1): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvick, Dwaine. 1986. “Stability and Change in the Views of Los Angeles Party Activists, 1968–1980.” In Political Parties in Local Areas, ed. Crotty, William. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press. Pp. 121–155.Google Scholar
Matraszek, Marek. 2002. “Practically Bedfellows.” Warsaw Business Journal, March 4.
Matraszek, Marek. 2005. “Victories, Defeats, Reconfigurations and Reinventions of the Polish Right.” In Why We Lost, eds. Učeň, Peter and Surotchak, Jan Erik. Bratislava: International Republican Institute. Pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
Mattheus, Ülo. 2004a. “Keskerakonna juhatus hakkab arutama mässajate küsimust.” Postimees, March 26.
Mattheus, Ülo. 2004b. “Tõnisson: Keskerakonda on saabunud vaikiv ajastu.” Postimees, April 14.
Mattson, Toomas and Sildam, Toomas. 2004. “‘Mässulised’ nõuavad Keskerakonna demokratiseerimist.” Postimees, April 3.
Matušková, Anna. 2007. “Poland: The Victory of ‘Social Oriented’ over ‘Liberal Oriented’ Poland.” In Visegrad Votes, eds. Šaradin, Pavel and Bradová, Eva. Olomouc: Palacký University. Pp. 59–88.Google Scholar
May, John D. 1973. “Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity.” Political Studies 21(2): 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Boguslaw. 2002. “Heil Lepper!” Wprost, May 23.
McGuire, James W. 1997. Peronism without Peron: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McMenamin, Iain and Gwiazda, Anna. 2011. “Three Roads to Institutionalisation: Vote-, Office- and Policy-Seeking Explanations of Party Switching in Poland.” European Journal of Political Research DOI: 10.1111/j.1475–6765.2010.01985.x.CrossRef
Meleshevich, Andrey A. 2007. Party Systems in Post-Soviet Countries: A Comparative Study of Political Institutionalization in the Baltic States, Russia, and Ukraine. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2005. “Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598(1): 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1966. Political Parties. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mickiewicz, Ellen and Richter, Andrei. 1996. “Television, Campaigning, and Elections in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia.” In Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy, eds. Swanson, David L. and Mancini, Paolo. Westport: Praeger. Pp. 107–128.Google Scholar
Mikkel, Evald. 1999. “1999. aasta Riigikogu valimised ja kandidaadid.” In Riigikogu valimised 1999, ed. Toomla, Rein. Tartu: Tartu University Press. Pp. 84–133.Google Scholar
Millard, Frances. 2003. “Elections in Poland 2001: Electoral Manipulation and Party Upheaval.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 36: 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, Frances. 2007. “The 2005 Parliamentary and Presidential Elections in Poland.” Electoral Studies 26(1): 196–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, Frances. 2009. “Poland: Parties without a Party System, 1991–2008.” Politics & Polity 37(4): 781–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohai, V. Lajos. 2006. “Gyurcsány de facto átvette az MSZP-t.” HVG, October 21. .
Montero, Jose Ramon and Gunther, Richard. 2002. “Introduction: Reviewing and Reassessing Parties.” In Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, eds. Gunther, Richard, Montero, Jose Ramon, and Linz, Juan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Kathleen A. 1996. “Crafting Representation in a New Democracy: The Case of Hungary.” PhD dissertation, Emory University.
Montgomery, Kathleen A. 1999. “Electoral Effects on Party Behavior and Development: Evidence from the Hungarian National Assembly.” Party Politics 5(4): 507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott and Swindle, Stephen M.. 2005. “Are Politics Local?: An Analysis of Voting Patterns in 23 Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 38(2): 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlang, Diana. 2003. “Hungary: Socialists Building Capitalism.” In The Left Transformed in Post-Communist Societies, eds. Leftwich Curry, Jane and Barth Urban, Joan. New York: Rowman & Littlefield. Pp. 61–99.Google Scholar
Moser, Robert G. 2001. Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Representation in Russia. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mõttus, Aaro (ed.). 2004. Riigikogu VII, VIII, ja IX koosseis. Statistikat ja kommentaare. Tallinn: Riigikogu Kantselei.Google Scholar
Mozaffar, Shaheen and Hames, R. Scarritt. 2005. “The Puzzle of African Party Systems.” Party Politics 11(4): 399–421.CrossRef
Mrozinski, Michel. 2004. “Poland's Ruling Left Faced with Unprecedented Crisis.” Agence France Presse, February 13.
MTI. 1992. “Surjan to Remain as CDPP President.” August 30.
MTI. 1994a. “Democratic Forum Press Conference on Elections.” May 13.
MTI. 1994b. “Lajos Fur Is Re-elected As HDF Chairman.” September 10.
MTI. 1995. “Democratic Forum Ends 9th National Conference.” May 28.
MTI. 1996. “Divided HDF Preparing for National Meeting.” February 28.
MTI. 2003. “Fidesz: Orbán vállalja az elnökjelöltséget.” HVG, February 28. .
Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, John and Alison, Mahr. 1999. Democracy and Democratization: Post-Communist Europe in Comparative Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Nagyné, G. and Ágnes, Maczó. 1995. “A Független Kisgazdapárt kampánya.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1994-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Nalewajko, Ewa and Wesołowski, Włodzimierz. 2007. “Five Terms of the Polish Parliament, 1989–2005.” Journal of Legislative Studies 13(1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nannestad, Peter and Paldam, Martin. 2002. “The Cost of Ruling: A Foundation Stone for Two Theories.” In Economic Voting, eds. Dorussen, Hans and Taylor, Michell. London: Routledge. Pp. 17–44.Google Scholar
Navracsics, Tibor. 2005. “Egy európai néppárt születése. A Fidesz – Magyar Polgári Szövetség 2004-ben.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2004-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
online, Népszava. 2004. “Szétválasztaná az MSZP a párt- és állami tisztségeket.” July 15. .php?id=18215.
Nicholson, Norman K. 1972. “The Factional Model and the Study of Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 5(1): 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooruddin, Irfan and Chhibber, Pradeep. 2008. “Unstable Politics: Fiscal Space and Electoral Volatility in the Indian States.” Comparative Political Studies 41(8): 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Odres, Elo. 2004. “Aasta tegija: Oodatud täht Anrus Ansip.” Kroonika, December 30.
Olczyk, Eliza. 2003a. “The SLD Before a Face Lifting.” World News Connection, June 25.
Olczyk, Eliza. 2003b. “A Titular Social Democracy.” World News Connection, October 2.
Olczyk, Eliza. 2003c. “Labor of Union Star.” World News Connection, October 14.
Olczyk, Eliza. 2008. “Left Wing at Crossroads (for Last Time?)” Rzeczpospolita, January 23.
Olson, David M. 1998. “Party Formation and Party System Consolidation in the New Democracies of Central Europe.” Political Studies 46: 432–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Org, Rein. 1996. “Miks sotsiaaldemokraadid ei soovi mõõukateks hakata?” Postimees, January 23.
Osser, Bernard. 2001. “Poland's Leszek Miller, a Communist Apparatchik Turned Social Democrat.” Agency Free Press, September 21.
Ost, D. 1995. “Labor, Class and Democracy: Shaping Political Antagonisms in Post-Communist Society.” In Markets, States, and Democracy: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformation, ed. Crawford, B.. Boulder: Westview Press. Pp. 177–203.Google Scholar
Otepalu, Olavi. 2008. “Poliitilist edukust mõjutavad tegurid Riigikogu kandidaatide selekteerimise protsessis.” MA thesis, University of Tartu.
Ottas, Aita. 1996. “Koonderakond peab Tartu soma nimekirjaks ‘Tartu 2000.’” Postimees, August 15.
Owens, John E. 2003. “Explaining Party Cohesion and Discipline in Democratic Legislatures: Purposiveness and Contests.” Journal of Legislative Studies 9(4): 12–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacek, Alexander C. 1994. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, Tomos. 2003. “Polish Radical Party Leader Asserts Authority in Party Purge.” World Markets Analysis, July 24.
Paet, Urmas. 1997. “Mart Laar hea meelega Isamaliitu ei juhiks.” Postimees, November 20.
Paet, Urmas. 1998a. “Maarahava Erakond ootab ühinemist.” Postimees, February 8.
Paet, Urmas. 1998b. “Ants Leemets usub Mart Siimanni jätkamisse.” Postimees, July 29.
Paet, Urmas. 1998c. “Andres Tarandile terendub valimisvõit.” Postimees, September 16.
Paet, Urmas. 1998d. “Noormõõdukad peavad erakonna sisevõitlust.” Postimees, October 14.
Paet, Urmas. 1999. “Reformierakonnas võitsid noorendajad.” Postimees, May 18.
Palmquist, Bradley. 1999. “Analysis of Proportions Data.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Society, College Station, TX, July 15–19.
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
PAP News Wire. 1991. “PSL Leader Wants to Cleanse Party of Pro-Communists.” March 23.
PAP News Wire. 1992. “Waldemar Pawlak Says Peasant Party is Growing Strong.” November 17.
PAP News Wire. 1993a. “PSL Wants to Be Rooted in Society before Entering Political Game.” April 18.
PAP News Wire. 1993b. “Tusk Says Liberal Democratic Congress – Party of the Future.” September 29.
PAP News Wire. 1996. “Union of Labour to Defend Its Identity.” February 25.
PAP News Wire. 1998. “Social Alliance Wants Map of Election Districts Earlier.” August 12.
PAP News Wire. 2001. “Leader of Troubled Centre Party Urges Defectors to Return.” January 23.
PAP News Wire. 2006a. “PO Leader: I Will Run for Re-Election in May.” March 1.
PAP News Wire. 2006b. “Tusk: Civic Platform Strategy Is Good.” April 21.
PAP News Wire. 2009. “PO launches rural campaign.” November 16.
Papke, Leslie E. and Wooldridge, Jeffrey. 1996. “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 11(6): 619–632.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papp, László Tamás. 2009. “Belpolitiakai szezonzárás Gyurcsány után, Orbán előtt.” HVG. July 2. hvg.hu/velemeny/20090702_papp_laszlo_tamas_gyurcsany_orban.
Parve, Ralf R. 2002. “Nädal Toompeal.” Kesknädal, October 30.
Patora, Tomasz and Stelmasiak, Marcin. 2004. “Poseł Pęczak za ciemnymi szybami, Nawigacja, telewizorek i zasłony.” Gazeta Wyborcza, November 14.
Pattie, C. J. and Johnston, R. J.. 2003. “Local Battles in a National Landslide: Constituency Campaign at the 2001 British General Election.” Political Geography 22(4): 381–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles, Whiteley, Paul, Johnston, Ron, and Seyd, Patrick. 1994. “Measuring Local Campaign Effects: Labour Party Constituency Campaigning at the 1987 General Election.” Political Studies 42(3): 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pečinka, Bohumil. 2003. “Co se dělo na kongresu ODS?” Revue Politika 1. .
Pehe, Jiri. 1990. “Changes in the Communist Party.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Report on Eastern Europe, November 30.
Perkins, Doug. 1996. “Structure and Choice: The Role of Organizations, Patronage and the Media in Party Formation.” Party Politics 2(3): 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlez, Jane. 1993. “Polish Cabinet Falls over Tight Budget.” New York Times, May 29.
Perlez, Jane. 1997. “Man in the News: Marian Krzaklewski, Architect of Solidarity's Victory.” New York Times, September 23.
Peters, B. Guy. 1998. Comparative Politics: Theory and Method. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1994. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1997. New Directions for Organization Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Salancik, Gerald R.. 2003. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, James. 2001. “New US Leader Looks Forward.” Prague Post, July 18.
PM Online. 2003. “Keskerakonna uus peasekretär on Kadri Must.” Postimees, December 10.
PM Online. 2004a. “Kreitzbergi ja Tõnissoni ähvardab väljaheitmine.” March 27.
PM Online. 2004b. “Parts arvustas Res Publica tipp-poliitikute eemaldumist erakonnast.” Postimees, April 10.
PM Online. 2004c. “Sinikraed hääletasid sotsid võidule.” June 16.
Pogonyi, Lajos. 2002. “Socialist Leader on Party's Public Messages, Media Control.” Nepszabadsag, May 10.
Poguntke, Thomas. 2002. “Party Organizational Linkage: Parties without Firm Social Roots?” In Political Parties in the New Europe, eds. Richard Luther, Kurt and Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. Oxford:Oxford University Press. Pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Polish News Bulletin. 1991a. “Impasse in PSL Continues.” April 4.
Polish News Bulletin. 1991b. “Roman Bartoszcze in Trouble.” June 3.
Polish News Bulletin. 1991c. “Krzaklewski Elected Solidarity Chairman.” February 25.
Polish News Bulletin. 1992a. “Prime Minister Waldemar Pawlak in the Eyes of other Politicians.” June 9.
Polish News Bulletin. 1992b. “Parties Count on Their Members.” July 16.
Polish News Bulletin. 1993a. “PC Congress in Sosnowiec.” April 26.
Polish News Bulletin. 1993b. “Ryszard Bugaj: The Balcerowicz of the Left.” October 8.
Polish News Bulletin. 1993c. “Democratic Union: Out of Sync.” October 25.
Polish News Bulletin. 1995a. “Who is Jozef?” February 9.
Polish News Bulletin. 1995b. “Freedom Union Elects Chairman.” April 3.
Polish News Bulletin. 1995c. “Interview with Freedom Union Leader Leszek Balcero-wicz.” April 20.
Polish News Bulletin. 1995d. “Olechowski to Set Up New Party.” July 21.
Polish News Bulletin. 1995e. “An Effective Alternative: Interview with UW Chairman Leszek Balcerowicz.” December 14.
Polish News Bulletin. 1996a. “What's Going On in the SLD?” March 15.
Polish News Bulletin. 1996b. “Middle Distance Strategy: Interview with Leszek Balcerowicz, Chairman of Freedom Union (UW).” July 18.
Polish News Bulletin. 1997a. “UW National Council Meets.” January 13.
Polish News Bulletin. 1997b. “Ziolkowska Blames Bugaj for UP Failure.” October 7.
Polish News Bulletin. 1997c. “The Losers: UP, PSL, ROP.” October 9.
Polish News Bulletin. 1997d. “Miller Elected SdRP Chairman.” December 8.
Polish News Bulletin. 1998. “SLD Headed Towards Political Party.” October 19.
Polish News Bulletin. 2000a. “Krzaklewski's Stalling on Presidency Question Erodes His Position as AWS Party Leader.” April 10.
Polish News Bulletin. 2000b. “Will Plazynski Step into Krzaklewski's Shoes?” October 19.
Polish News Bulletin. 2000c. “Plazynski Quits RS AWS.” December 21.
Polish News Bulletin. 2001a. “Miller versus Kwasniewski – SLD's Homogeneity at Stake?” July 2.
Polish News Bulletin. 2001b. “Polish Voters Divided between SLD Supporters and the Confused Rest.” August 23.
Polish News Bulletin. 2001c. “Lepper's Team.” October 25.
Polish News Bulletin. 2001d. “Waiting on the Platform.” November 8.
Polish News Bulletin. 2001e. “SLD Council Meeting Reveals Inward Frictions.” December 10.
Polish News Bulletin. 2002a. “Kalinowski Fights for Political Life as Mutineers Gather.” March 7.
Polish News Bulletin. 2002b. “Centre-Right Lays Out Tough Party Structures.” May 9.
Polish News Bulletin. 2002c. “The Andrzej Lepper Show Even Bigger than the World Cup.” June 13.
Polish News Bulletin. 2002d. “PiS to Become a Larger Party.” December 31.
Polish News Bulletin. 2003a. “Dictatorship of Andrzej Lepper More Deputies Leave Samoobrona.” July 24.
Polish News Bulletin. 2003b. “Populist Leader Melts His Own Grouping.” August 11.
Polish News Bulletin. 2004a. “Sinking Ship The SLD's Fortunes Seem to Have Reached Rock-Bottom? But Is the Party Capable of Bouncing Back?” February 26.
Polish News Bulletin. 2004b. “Going to War PO Throws Gauntlet at Self-Defence in Effort to Become a Mass Party.” March 11.
Polish News Bulletin. 2004c. “Polish Left Lands in the Kindergarten of Democracy.” May 20.
Polish News Bulletin. 2004d. “Ruthless, Pragmatic, Effective for Giertych and the LPR, the Only Way Seems to Be Up.” October 21.
Polish News Bulletin. 2007a. “Former President's Return to Politics to Send Tremors through Left Wing of Domestic Political Scene.” April 5.
Polish News Bulletin. 2007b. “Leszek Miller's Transfer or What Politics Has in Common with Football.” September 27.
Polish News Bulletin. 2009. “PO Light Years Ahead of Pack in Strategic Thinking.” March 26.
Pomper, Gerard M. 1990. “Party Organization and Electoral Success.” Polity 23(2): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porila, Mart. 1999. “Maaparteid loovad endale laia põhja.” Maaleht, July 1.
Postimees. 2000. “Aeg Hamletit mängida.” March 21.
Postimees. 2001a. “Värsket verd poliitikasse.” July 11.
Postimees. 2001b. “Res Publica lubab luau uut tüüpi erakonna.” August 31.
Postimees. 2001c. “Res Publica esimeheks kandideerib Rein Taagepera.” November 28.
Postimees. 2002a. “Reformierakonnal on 2500 liiget.” May 22.
Postimees. 2002b. “Res Publica reha.” November 23.
Postimees. 2003. “Reformierakonna peasekretär vahetub.” April 14.
Postimees. 2004. “Juhtkiri: Suure juhi vari.” March 25.
Postimees. 2006a. “Reformierakond sihib Riigikogu valimistel 27 kohta.” April 29.
Postimees. 2006b. “Keskerakond saab täna 15-aastaseks.” October 12.
Postimees. 2009a. “Keskerakond läheb bussiga maale valimisreklaami tegema.” May 6.
Postimees. 2009b. “Enn Soosaar: Savisaar suudab, mida teised ei suuda, ei oska, ei jaksa.” October 20.
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1995. “Political Parties and Their Strategies in the Transition from Authoritarian Rule: The Comparative Perspective.” In Party Formation in East–Central Europe: Post-Communist Politics in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Bulgaria, ed. Wightman, Gordon. Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Primo, David M. and Snyder, James M.. 2010. “Party Strength, the Personal Vote, and Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 354–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przweorski, Adam and Teune, Henry. 1979. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Raciborski, Jacek. 1999. “How the Voters Respond: Poland.” In Cleavages, Parties, and Voters, eds. Lawson, Kay, Römmele, Andrea, and Karasimeonov, Georgi. Westport, CT: Praeger. Pp. 239–260.Google Scholar
Racz, Barnabas. 1993. “The Socialist-Left Opposition in Post-Communist Hungary.” Europe-Asia Studies 45(4): 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racz, Barnabas. 2000. “The Hungarian Socialists in Opposition: Stagnation or Renaissance.” Europe-Asia Studies 52(2): 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racz, Barnabas and Kukorelli, Istvàn. 1995. “The “Second-Generation” Post-Communist Elections in Hungary in 1994.” Europe-Asia Studies 47(2): 251–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, Erik. 2009. “Arnold Rüütel: esimees on oluline, kuid organisatsiooni tegevus tähtsam.” EPL, November 17.
Raudvere, Rein. 2008. “Rahvarinne viis vene tankide hirmu.” Maaleht, April 17.
Raun, Mati. 2001. “Ema sünnitas isa.” Postimees, December 17.
Raunio, Tapio. 2005. “Finland: One Hundred Years of Quietude.” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, eds. Gallagher, Michael and Mitchell, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reams, Margaret A. and Ray, Brooks H.. 1993. “The Effects of Three Prompting Methods on Recycling Participation Rates: A Field Study.” Journal of Environmental Systems 22(4): 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiljan, Villu. 2005. Interview with Erki Berens in KUKU radio program “Kukul külas.” July 3, 2005.
Reinap, Aivar. 2006. “Online-intervjuu: küsimustele vastas Toomas Hendrik Ilves.” PM Online, September 12.
Reinap, Aivar and Koch, Tuuli. 2006. “Toompea raisakotkad Res Publica riismetel.” Postimees, March 4.
Remmer, Karen. 2007. “The political economy of patronage: expenditure patterns in the Argentine provinces, 1983–2003.” Journal of Politics 69(2): 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Stuart A. 1925. “The Behavior of Legislative Groups.” Political Science Quarterly 40(1): 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripp, Zoltán. 2008. “Reformok és viták éve: az MSZP 2007-ben.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2007-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogala, Jan. 1990. “On Central Alliance.” Polish News Bulletin, August 2.
Rogers, William H. 1993. ‘‘Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.’’ Stata Technical Bulletin 13: 19–23.Google Scholar
Römmele, Andrea. 1999. “Cleavage Structures and Party Systems in East and Central Europe.” In Cleavages, Parties, and Voters, eds. Lawson, Kay, Römmele, Andrea, and Karasimeonov, Georgi. Westport, CT: Praeger. Pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo and Langston, Joy. 2011. “Gubernatorial Effects on the Voting Behavior of National Legislators.” Journal of Politics 73(2): 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo and Shomer, Yael. 2008. “Models of Nonresponse in Legislative Politics.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(4): 573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1995. “Mobilizing Demobilized Voters in Post-Communist Societies.” Party Politics 1(4): 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard, and Mishler, William. 1998. “Negative and Positive Party Identification in Post-Communist Countries.” Electoral Studies 17(2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard and Munro, Neil. 2003. Elections and Parties in New European Democracies. Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rozental, Väinu. 2008. “Tiit Vähi: Jõuline pragmaatik.” Äripäev, September 12.
Ruusing, Helle (ed.). 2007. “Tulemuse määrab valimistevaheline töö.” Riigikogu Toimetised 15. /index.php?id=10856.
Rzeczpospolita. 2004. “Kulisy afery Orlenu.” December 14.
Rzeczpospolita. 2005. “Aleksander łaskawy.” December 2.
, Saarlane. 2000. “Kallas tunnistas oma partei populaarsuse langust.” May 9.
Saarts, Tõnis. 2004. “Mis suunas liigub Eesti ühiskond?” Õpetajate leht, June 4.
Sabbat-Swidlicka, Anna. 1990. “After the Peasants’ Unity Congress: A New Political Constellation?” RFE/RL Report on Eastern Europe, May 25.
Saiz, Martin and Geser, Hans. 1999. Local Parties in Political and Organizational Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Salancik, Gerald R. and Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1974. “The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University.” Administrative Science Quarterly 19: 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šaradín, Pavel. 2007. “The Influence of the Strong Bi-Polarization.” In Visegrad Votes: Parliamentary elections 2005–2006, eds. Šaradín, Pavel and Bradová, Eva. Olomouc: Palacky University. Pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Savisaar, Edgar. 2002. “Eesti Keskerakonna valimiseelsetest positsioonidest.” Kesknädal, August 28.
Saxonberg, Steven. 1999. “Václav Klaus: The Rise and Fall and Re-Emergence of a Charismatic Leader.” East European Politics & Societies 13(2): 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1994. “The ‘Paradox of Enrollment’: Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Party Membership.” European Journal of Political Research 25(1): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1996. Parties and Their Members: Organising for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 1999. “Parties and the Expansion of Direct Democracy: Who Benefits?” Party Politics 5(3): 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. 2000. “Parties without Members? Party Organization in a Changing Electoral Environment.” In Parties without Partisans, eds. Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E., Webb, Paul, and Farrell, David M.. 2002. “From Social Integration to Electoral Contestation: The Changing Distribution of Power within Political Parties.” In Parties without Partisans, eds. Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1984. “On the Theory of Party Organization.” Journal of Politics 46(2): 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Norman and Miller, Gary. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the US.” American Political Science Review 97(2): 245–260.Google Scholar
Schofield, Norman and Sened, Itai. 2006. Multiparty Democracy: Parties, Elections and Legislative Politics in Multiparty Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Richard W. 2004. “Reflection on the Half-Century of Organizational Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebestyén, István. 2007. “Egy másik Fidesz.” Hetek 11(14), April 6. .Google Scholar
Sebestyén, István and Szlazsánszky, Ferenc. 2001. “Feldarabolt párt.” Hetek 5(19), May 12. .Google Scholar
Seisselberg, Jörg. 1996. “Conditions of Success and Political Problems of a ‘Media-Mediated Personality-Party’: The Case of Forza Italia.” West European Politics 19(4): 715–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepp, Evelyn. 2011. “Evelyn Sepp: KE valimisnimekirjast.” Evelyn Sepa Sisering, Blog, January 17. .
Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul. 1992. Labour's Grass Roots: The Politics of Party Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shabad, Goldie and Slomczynski, Kazimierz M.. 2004. “The Emergence of Career Politicians in Post-Communist Democracies: Poland and the Czech Republic.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(3): 333–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, Boas, House, Robert J., and Arthur, Michale B.. 1993. “The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory.” Organization Science 4(4): 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Michael. 2001. “The Politization of Place in Italy.” Political Geography 20: 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shippan, Charles R. and Volden, Craig. 2008. The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shomer, Yael. 2009. “Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking Behavior.” Comparative Political Studies 42(7): 945–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, MatthewSøberg, MelodyValdini, Ellis, and Suominen, Kati. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. “Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Legislative Studies 12(2): 150–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siimann, Mart. 2005. “Mart Siimann: Peaminister 17.03.1997–25.03.1999.” Public lecture delivered at Nord University, Tallinn, Estonia, May 24.
Sikk, Allan. 2005. “How Unstable? Volatility and the Genuinely New Parties in Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 44: 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikk, Allan (ed.). 2007. Riigikogu X koosseis. Statistikat ja ülevaateid. Tallinn: Riigikogu Kantselei.Google Scholar
Sildam, Toomas. 2001. “Taal: poliitika pole kellegi monopol.” Postimees, July 11.
Simson, Priit. 2002. “Keskerakond alustas valimiskampaaniat.” Postimees, August 17.
Skjæveland, Asbjørn. 2001. “Party Cohesion in the Danish Parliament.” Journal of Legislative Studies 7(1): 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skórzyński, Jana. 2003. System Rywina czyli druga strona III Rzeczpospolitej. Warsaw: Świat Książki.Google Scholar
Smith, Ben and Martin, Jonathan. 2008. “Why Obama Won.” Politico, November 5.
Smith, Steven S. and Remington, Thomas F.. 2001. The Politics of Institutional Choice: The Formation of the Russian State Duma. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolar, Aleksander. 1998. “Poland's Emerging Party System.” Journal of Democracy 9(2): 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šmutov, Martin. 2006. “Sotsiaaldemokraadid alustasid märtsivalimiste kampaaniat.” Postimees, September 26.
Sorauf, Frank J. and Wilson, Scott A.. 1990. “Campaigns and Money: A Changing Role for the Political Parties?” In The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System, ed. Maisel, L. Sandy. Boulder: Westview Press. Pp. 187–203.Google Scholar
Soule, John W. and James, W. Clarke. 1970. “Amateurs and Professionals: A Study of Delegates to the 1968 Democratic National Convention.” American Political Science Review 64(3): 888–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spirova, Maria. 2007. Political Parties in Post-Communist Societies: Formation, Persistence, and Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurek, Sylwia. 2002. Kobiety. Partie. Wybory. Łódź: Centrum Praw Kobiet.
Stark, David Charles and Lászlo, Bruszt. 1998. Post-Socialist Pathways and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stegmaier, Mary and Klara, Vlachová. 2009. “The Endurance of the Czech Communist Party.” Politics and Policy 37(4): 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57(2): 368–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1992. “Valence Politics.” In Electoral Politics, ed. Kavanagh, Dennis. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pp. 141–164.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Walter D. and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 1983. “Winning May Not Be Everything, But It's more than We Thought: Presidential Party Activists in 1980.” American Political Science Review 77(4): 945–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. 2001. “The Limited Reach of Russia's Party System: Under-Institutionalization in Dual Transitions.” Politics and Society 29(3): 385–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stránský, Jan Martin. 2004. “The Problem with Václav Klaus.” The New Presence 1: 7–10.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas and Baur, Martin. 2002. “Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 506–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroehlein, Andrew. 1998. “Klaus, One Year after the Fall.” Central Europe Review, November 30.
Strom, Kaare. 1990. “A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 565–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabados, Krisztián and Krekó, Péter. 2007. “Mi van még a csúcson túl? Hiller István politikusi portréja.” NOL, November 26. .
Szabó, Tamás. 1995. “MDF – egy végre nem hajtott kampány.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1994-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Szarvas, László. 1998. “Sok mozgás közben helybenjárás – pártfarkciók ’97.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1997-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. 1999a. “Testing Party Models in East-Central Europe: Local Party Organization in Postcommunist Poland.” Party Politics 5(4): 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. 1999b. “The Impact of the 1998 Local Elections on the Emerging Polish Party System.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 15(3): 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2001a. “Party Structure and Organizational Development in Post-Communist Poland.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 17(2): 94–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2001b. “The Polish Peasant Party: A Mass Party in Postcommunist Eastern Europe?” East European Politics & Societies 15: 554–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2001c. “The ‘Professionalization’ of Party Campaigning in Post-Communist Poland.” In Party Development and Democratic Party Change in Post-Communist Europe, ed. Lewis, P. G.. London: Frank Cass. Pp. 78–92.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2001d. Poles Together? The Emergence and Development of Political Parties in Postcommunist Poland. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2004. “The Polish Centre-Right's (Last?) Best Hope: The Rise and Fall of Solidarity Electoral Action.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20(3): 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szekeres, Imre. 1995. “Magyar Szocialista Párt.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1994-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Szekeres, Imre and Szeredi, Péter. 1999. “Látkép csata után.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2000-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Szlazsánszky, Ferenc. 2003. “Az Európai Parliament egy sóhivatal.” Hetek 7(45), November 7. .Google Scholar
Szobota, Zoltán. 2000. “Van-e liberálkonzervativizmus.” Hetek 4(38), September 16. .Google Scholar
‘t Hart, Paul and Uhr, John. (eds.). 2011. How Power Changes Hands: Transition and Succession in Government. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein. 2006. “Meteoric Trajectory: The Res Publica Party in Estonia.” Democratization 13(1): 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallo, Ivar. 1996. “Daam roosas kleidis.” Postimees, April 9.
Talving, Heikki. 1998a. “Isamaliit otsib oma ridadesse uusi inimesi.” Postimees, August 16.
Talving, Heikki. 1998b. “Isamaliit taotleb valimisedu Mart Laari juhtimisel.” Posti-mees, October 25.
Tamás, Tibor. 2002. “Grespik: a MIÉP gondjait Papolczy távozása sem oldaná meg.” NOL, December 30. .
Tamási Orosz, János. 2006. “Nem gondoljuk azt, hogy mi vagyunk a kenyér I.” MKDSZ, February 23. .
Tamm, Merike. 2009. “Michal seadis Reformierakonna eesm'rgiks 10000 liiget.” Postimees, December 12.
Tammer, Enno. 1995a. “Isamaliit on teel oppositisiooni.” Postimees, December 7.
Tammer, Enno. 1995b. “Sotsid seisavad valiku ees.” Postimees, December 18.
Tammer, Enno. 1996a. “Keskerakonna esimees loodab veel kongressile.” Postimees, March 16.
Tammer, Enno. 1996b. “Koonderakond vahetab peasekretäri.” Postimees, March 27.
Tammer, Enno. 1996c. “Andres Tarand parteistus.” Postimees, May 7.
Tammer, Enno. 1997. “Valimisliidud poliitilisel vaekausil.” Postimees, January 16.
Tan, Alexander C. 2000. Members, Organization, Performance: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Party Membership Size. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tänavsuu, Hille. 2004. “Uurijad ennustavad Reformierkonnale edu.” Pärnu Postimees, November 23.
Tarand, Andres. 1999a. “Kaks pead või üks pea.” Postimees, May 22.
Tarand, Andres. 1999b. “Ebaõnn ei löö rööpaist välja.” Postimees, October 28.
Tarand, Andres. 2002. “Vara veel hingekella lüüa.” Põhjarannik, November 9.
Tarand, Kaarel. 1997. “Selgrootute partei.” Luup 16(47), August 4.Google Scholar
TASR News Agency. 2001. “Slovak Premier Drafts Amendments to Approved Territorial Reform.” TASR News Agency, July 23.
Tavits, Margit. 2005. “The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post-Communist Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2008a. “Party Systems in the Making: The Emergence and Success of New Parties in New Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2008b. “On the Linkage between Electoral Volatility and Party System Instability in Central and Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 47(5): 537–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2009a. “The Making of Mavericks: Local Loyalties and Party Defections.” Comparative Political Studies 42(6): 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2009b. “Party Organizations and Electoral Performance in Post-Communist Europe.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, September 3–6.
Tavits, Margit. 2009c. “Geographically Targeted Spending: Exploring the Electoral Strategies of Incumbent Governments.” European Political Science Review 1(1): 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2009d. Presidents with Prime Ministers: Do Direct Elections Matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2010. “The Effect of Local Ties on Electoral Success and Parliamentary Behavior: The Case of Estonia.” Party Politics 16(2): 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2012. “Party Organizational Strength and Party Unity in Post-Communist Europe.” European Political Science Review 4(3): 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit and Annus, Taavi. 2006. “Learning to Make Votes Count: The Role of Democratic Experience.” Electoral Studies 25(1): 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit and Letki, Natalia. 2009. “When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe.” American Political Science Review 103(4): 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thames, Frank C. 2005. “A House Divided: Party Strength and the Mandate Divide in Hungary, Russia and Ukraine.” Comparative Political Studies 38(3): 282–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, Dean and Wisse, Barbara (eds.). 2009. Power and Interdependence in Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toka, Gabor. 1998. “Party Appeals and Voter Loyalty in New Democracies.” Political Studies 46: 589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Tucker, Joshua A., and Wittenberg, Jason. 2002. “An Easy and Accurate Regression Model for Multiparty Electoral Data.” Political Analysis 10(1): 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toole, James. 2003. “Straddling the East-West Divide: Party Organisation and Communist Legacies in East Central Europe.” Europe-Asia Studies 55(1): 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toomla, Rein. 1999. Eesti Erakonnad. Tallinn: Estonian Encyclopedia Press.Google Scholar
Tootsen, Toivo. 1998. Keskerakond kohalikes omavalitsustes. Tallinn: TEA Press.Google Scholar
Tóth, Csaba and Török, Gábor. 2002. “SZDSZ: stagnálás vagy stabilizálódás.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 2001-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-RomGoogle Scholar
Třeštík, Michael, (ed.). 2005. Kdo je kdo. Osobnosti české současnosti. Prague: Agentura Kdo je kdo.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A. 2006. Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turay, Abdul. 2009. “Savisaar – Eesti seksikaim mees.” Postimees, September 2.
Tworzecki, Hubert. 2003. Learning to Choose: Electoral Politics in East-Central Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ülavere, Raimo. 2007. “Ühe erakonna lõpuagoonia.” Postimees, October 10.
Urbanek, Mariusz. 2002. “Human Resources Boss.” World News Connection, November 16.
Vachudová, Milada Anna. 1993. “Divisions in the Czech Communist Party.” RFE/RL Report, September 17.
Vahe, Urmas. 2011. “Kas Evelin Sepp kõrgest poliitmängust väljas?” Õhtuleht, January 18.
Vaher, Ken-Marti. 2001. “Uus erakond otsib terviklahendusi.” Postimees, September 28.
Vähi, Tiit. 2006. “Tiit Vähi: Peaminister 30.01.1992–21.10.1992; 17.04.1995–06.11.1995; 06.11.1995–12.1996; 12.1996–17.03.1997.” Public lecture delivered at Nord University, Tallinn, Estonia, March 29.
Valner, Sulev. 2003. “Ivari Padar: Olen nõus olema mudavasakpoolne.” Maaleht, February 13.
Van Biezen, Ingrid. 2003. Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buuren, Stef and Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin. 2011. “MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 45(3): 1–67.Google Scholar
Van der Brug, Wouter and Mughan, Anthony. 2007. “Charisma, Leader Effects and Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties.” Party Politics 13(1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, Domokos György. 1996. “A Bokros éve.” In Magyarország politikai évkönyve 1995-ről, eds. Sándor, Péter and Vass, László. Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány. CD-Rom.Google Scholar
Veidemann, Andra. 1996. “Keskerakonnale mõeldes.” Postimees, March 28.
Vidos, Tibor. 1994. “The Gentlemanly Way to Do Insider Party Politics.” Budapest Business Journal, September 16.
Villem, Andrus. 1996. “KMÜ satelliiterakonnad kohalike valimiste eel.” Postimees, May 27.
Villem, Andrus. 1998. “Ellujäämistahe ja enesehävitustung.” Postimees, October 12.
Volkens, Andrea, Lacewell, Onawa, Regel, Sven, Schultze, Henrike, and Werner, Annika. 2010. The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).Google Scholar
Vöörmann, Mai. 2001. “Koonderakond on surnud!” Postimees, August 6.
Waller, Michael. 1995. “Adaptation of the Former Communist Parties of East-Central Europe: A Case of Social-Democratization?” Party Politics 1(4): 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Ian. 2003. “‘Localizing the National' The Rediscovery and Reshaping of Local Campaign in Australia.” Party Politics 9(5): 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Alan. 1992. “Activist–Leader Relations and the Structure of Political Parties: ‘Exchange’ Models and Vote-Seeking Behaviour in Parties.” British Journal of Political Science 22(1): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterbury, Myra A. 2006. “Internal Exclusion, External Inclusion: Diaspora Politics and Party-Building Strategies in Post-Communist Hungary.” East European Politics & Societies 20: 483–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Paul D. 1995. “Are British Political Parties in Decline?” Party Politics 1(3): 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Martin. 2003. “The KDU-CSL S Josef Lux Redux.” Prague Business Journal, December 1.
Wellhofer, E. Spencer. 1979. “The Effectiveness of Party Organization: A Cross-National, Time Series Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 7(2): 205–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F., Seyd, Patrick and Richardson, Jeremy. 1994. True Blues: The Politics of Conservative Party Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul F. and Seyd, Patrick. 1994. “Local Party Campaigning and Electoral Mobilization in Britain.” Journal of Politics 56(1): 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widfeldt, Anders. 1999. Linking Parties with People? Party Membership in Sweden 1960–1997. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1965. “The Goldwater Phenomenon: Purists, Politicians and the Two-Party System.” Review of Politics 27(3): 386–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1962. The Amateur Democrat. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolinetz, Steven B. 1990. “The Transformation of West European Party Systems.” In The West European Party System, ed. Mair, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 218–231.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey. 2002. Introductory Econometrics. Mason: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
World News Connection. 2002. “Senator Topolanek Explains Bid to Succeed Vaclav Klaus as Leader of Czech ODS.” November 15.
Wyman, Matthew, White, Stephen, Miller, Bill, and Heywood, Paul. 1995. “The Place of ‘Party’ in Post-Communist Europe.” Party Politics 1(4): 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zádori, Zsolt. 2007. “Kuncze után, de nem szabadon.” January 19. .
Zaluska, Wojciech. 1995. “Balcerowicz Wants Party Discipline.” Polish News Bulletin, May 4.
Zaluska, Wojciech. 2008. “Napieralski Learns During Lunches.” Gazeta Wyborcza, August 1.
Ziblatt, Daniel F. 1998. “The Adaptation of Ex-Communist Parties to Post-Communist East Central Europe: A Comparative Study of the East German and Hungarian Ex-Communist Parties.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31(2): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, Jakub. 2002. “Translating Social Cleavages into Party Systems: The Significance of New Democracies.” World Politics 54(2): 184–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zielinski, Jakub, Slomczynski, Kazimierz M., and Shabad, Goldie. 2005. “Electoral Control in New Democracies: The Perverse Incentives of Fluid Party Systems.” World Politics 57(3): 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubek, Radoslaw. 2008. “Parties, Rules and Government Legislative Control in Central Europe: The Case of Poland.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 41(2): 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubek, Voytek. 1995. “The Phoenix Out of the Ashes: The Rise to Power of Poland's Post-Communist SdRP.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 28(3): 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Margit Tavits, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565196.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Margit Tavits, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565196.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Margit Tavits, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565196.009
Available formats
×