Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-wdwc2 Total loading time: 0.723 Render date: 2022-01-22T00:20:23.265Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

17 - Institutional Mechanisms for Investigating the Regulatory Implications of a Major Crisis

The Commission of Inquiry and the Safety Board

from Part V - Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2017

Edward J. Balleisen
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Lori S. Bennear
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Kimberly D. Krawiec
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Jonathan B. Wiener
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Policy Shock
Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises
, pp. 483 - 484
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, David C. 1993. “Industry Views on Chemical Process Safety,” Process Safety Progress. 12 (2): 104105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, Adam. 1990. “Reckoning Schemes of Legitimation: On Commissions of Inquiry as Power/Knowledge Forms.” Journal of Historical Sociology 3 (1): 122. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.1990.tb00143.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Terry. 1995. “Independent Investigation of Transportation Accidents,” Safety Science. 19: 271–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belke, James C. and Dietrich, Deborah Y.. 2005. “The Post-Bhopal and Post-9/11 Transformations in Chemical Emergency Prevention and Response Policy in the United States.” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 18: 375–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennear, Lori S. 2015. “Offshore Oil and Gas Drilling: A Review of Regulatory Regimes in the United States, United Kingdom, and Norway.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 9 (1): 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Thomas R. 1999. “Canadian Commissions of Inquiry: An Insider’s Perspective.” In Manson, Allan and Mullan, David J. eds., Commissions of Inquiry: Praise or Reappraise?, 1330. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, Inc.Google Scholar
Bowling, David C. 2005. “The Capture Theory and Federal Investigations of Aviation Accidents,” Northern Illinois University (Ph.D. Dissertation).
Bradley, A.W. 2003. “Commissions of Inquiry and Governmental Accountability: Recent British Experience.” In Manson, Allan and Mullan, David J. eds., Commissions of Inquiry: Praise or Reappraise?, 3178. Ontario: Irwin Law, Inc.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Capps, Lois. 2010. To Give Subpoena Power to the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. (2010H.R. 5481). www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr5481.
Centa, Robert, and Macklem, Patrick. 2001. “Securing Accountability through Commissions of Inquiry: A Role for the Law Commission of Canada.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 39(1): 117–60.Google Scholar
Cheang, David. 2015. Leading Change in the Public Sector: Dr Moure-Eraso’s Chairmanship of the US Chemical Safety Board. Master’s Project for Master in Environmental Management. Durham, NC: Duke University. http://bit.ly/1QKuroL.Google Scholar
Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB). 1998. Budget Justification Fiscal Year 1999.
Chicago Tribune. 1977. “Disasters Are Their Business.” Chicago Tribune. March 15: 1.PubMed
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (COGR). 2014. Whistleblower Reprisal and Management Failures at the U.S. Chemical Safety Board: Staff Report. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/CSB-FINAL-REPORT-Redact-version.pdf.
Cooray, L. J. M. 1985. “Royal Commissions Of Inquiry And Statutory Tribunals.” In Human Rights in Australia. Epping, Australia: ACFR Community Education Project. www.ourcivilisation.com/cooray/rights/chap12.htm#12.0.
Crow, P. 2000. “Chem Board Back on Track,” Oil & Gas Journal. 98(1): 29.Google Scholar
Dutch Parliament. 2013. Netherland Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority. www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/dossiers/netherlands-food-and-consumer-product-safety-authority.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General (EPA OIG). 2013. Semiannual Report to Congress, April 1 2013-September 30, 2013. EPA-350-R-13-003. www.epa.gov/office-inspector-general/semiannual-report-apr-1-2013-sept-30-2013.
Essers, Loek. 2012. “Report: Dutch Government Was Unprepared for SSL Hack,” IDG News Service. June 28. www.pcworld.com/article/258505/report_dutch_government_was_unprepared_for_ssl_hack.html.
Farson, Stuart, and Phythian, Mark. 2010. Commissions of Inquiry and National Security: Comparative Approaches: Comparative Approaches. ABC-CLIO.
Fielding, Eric, Lo, Andrew W., and Yang, Jian Helen. 2011. “The National Transportation Safety Board: A Model for Systemic Risk Management,” Journal of Investment Management. 9(1): 1749.Google Scholar
Flight International. 2009. “Dutch Find Trio of Shortcomings in Apache Mishap,” Feb. 24–March 2.
Getmansky, Mila, Lo, Andrew W., and Mei, Shauna X.. 2004. “Sifting through the Wreckage: Lessons from Recent Hedge-Fund Liquidations.” Journal of Investment Management 2(4): 638.Google Scholar
Gilligan, George. 2002. “Royal Commissions of Inquiry.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 35 (3): 289307. doi:10.1375/acri.35.3.289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassman, Matthew E., and Straus, Jacob R.. 2013. “Congressional Commissions: Overview, Structure, and Legislative Considerations.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service R40076 https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40076.pdf.
Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2008. Chemical Safety Board: Improvements in Management and Oversight are Needed. GAO-08-864R. www.gao.gov/new.items/d08864r.pdf.
Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2000. Chemical Safety Board: Improved Policies and Additional Oversight are Needed. GAO/RCED-00-192. www.gao.gov/new.items/rc00192.pdf.
Graham, Bob, and Reilly, William K.. 2014. “The BP Gulf Oil Spill – Four Years Later.” Oil Spill Commission Action. http://oscaction.org/wp-content/uploads/Graham-Reilly-Statement-April-2012.pdf.
Hanlon, Natalie. 1991. “Military Base Closings: A Study of Government by Commission.” University of Colorado Law Review 62: 331–64.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher A. 2014. Chair, National Transportation Safety Board. In-person interview.
Hart, Christopher A. 2012. “Transferability of Aviation Mishap Investigation Process to Healthcare?” Presentation to Human Factors in Health Care, Johns Hopkins University, Nov. 12.
Institute for Government Research of the Brookings Institution. 1930. Aeronautics Branch Department of Commerce: Its History, Activities, and Organization. Service Monographs of the United States Government No. 61.
Inwood, Gregory J., and Johns, Carolyn M.. 2014. Commissions of Inquiry and Policy Change: A Comparative Analysis. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Eva. 2011. “Accident Investigations: A Comparative Perspective on Societal Safety in Norway and Sweden, 1970–2010.” Scandinavian Journal of History. 36(2): 206–29.Google Scholar
Johnson, Loch. 1995. “The Aspin-Brown Intelligence Inquiry: Behind the Closed Doors of a Blue Ribbon Commission.” Studies in Intelligence 48 (3): 120. www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol48no3/pdf/v48i3a01p.pdf.Google Scholar
Jupp, Jeff. 2005. “Aviation,” in Accidents and Agenda: Full Sector Reports, 315. London: Royal Academy of Engineering:. www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/accidents-and-agenda-full-sector-reports.Google Scholar
Keith, K.J. 2003. “Commissions of Inquiry: Some Thoughts from New Zealand.” In Manson, Allan and Mullan, David J. eds., Commissions of Inquiry: Praise or Reappraise?, 153–82. Toronto, ON: Irwin Law, Inc.Google Scholar
Kitts, Kenneth. 2006. Presidential Commissions & National Security. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Klemin, Alexander, 1927. “Aeronautical Education,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 131: 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolly, Joesph. 2014. NTSB Office of Research and Engineering. In-person interview.
Lo, Andrew W. 2010. “The Financial Industry Needs Its Own Crash Safety Board,” Financial Times, March 2. www.ft.com/cms/s/0/011cbf2e-2599-11df-9bd3-00144feab49a.html#axzz3P6g0swsg.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times. 1972. “OK Autonomy, Traffic Safety Board Requests: Federal Panel Asks Congress for Broader Power to Investigate Surface Accidents,” Los Angeles Times, June 9.
Lieberman, Joseph. Senator (CT). 1989. “A Need for a National Chemical Safety Board.” Congressional Record 135. No. 149 (Nov): 14538. http://webarchive.loc.gov/congressional-record/20160314161751/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r101:16:./temp/~r101ouvHK4.
Lovett, Kenneth. 2014. “Gov. Cuomo Stands by His Decision to Shut down Anti-Corruption Commission.” NY Daily News, April 25. www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/gov-cuomo-stands-anti-corruption-commission-shutdown-article-1.1768508.
McGarity, Thomas O. 2005. “Resisting Regulation with Blue Ribbon Panels.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 33: 1157–98.Google Scholar
Moss, Randolf D. 2000. Division of Power and Responsibilities between the Chairperson of the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Board as a Whole. Opinion of the Office of Legal Council at the US Department of Justice. https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/olc/chemsafetyboardopinionfinal.htm.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 1987. Implementation of the Recommendations of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. http://history.nasa.gov/rogersrep/genindex.htm.
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) 1968. Annual Report to Congress, 1967.
National Security Preparedness Group. 2011. “The Status of the 9/11 Commission Recommendations.” Bipartisan Policy Center. http://abcnews.go.com/images/Blotter/Final%20NSPG%20911%20Report%20Card%20August%202011.pdf.
New York Times. 1922. “Aircraft Industry Forms Corporation,” New York Times. Jan. 1: 6.
New York Times. 1974. “An Accident Investigator Quits in Dispute of Role of Politics,” New York Times, Sept. 5: 16.
Orlando Sentinel. 1991. “Bush Sacrificing Environment for a Non-Existent Principle,” Orlando Sentinel. June 2: G3.
Pollack, Kristina. 1998. “The Swedish Board of Accident Investigation.” In Klaus-Martin, Goeters, ed. Aviation Psychology: A Science and A Profession, 249–55. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Post, George B. 1927. “Aspects of Commercial Aviation in the U.S.A.,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 131: 7178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radio Netherlands News Report. 2012. “Dutch Safety Board: Too Many Medical Mistakes,” www.expatica.com/nl/news/Dutch-Safety-Board-too-many-medical-mistakes_324958.html.
Rees, Joseph. 2009. Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of Nuclear Safety since Three Mile Island. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Relyea, Harold C. 1996. Government Division, Congressional Research Service. The National Performance Review. Dec 6.
Resodihardjo, Sandra L. 2006. “Wielding a Double-Edged Sword: The Use of Inquiries at Times of Crisis.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 14 (4): 199206. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2006.00496.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Mike, and McAllister, Laura. 2006. “The Roles of Commissions of Inquiry in the Policy Process.” Public Policy and Administration 21 (4): 99115. doi:10.1177/095207670602100408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedor, Joseph and Schulze, Dana. 2014. NTSB Office of Aviation Safety. In-person interview.
Spencer, Melissa. “Engineering Financial Safety: A System-Theoretic Case Study from the Financial Crisis.” (Master’s Thesis in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Stoop, J. 2004. “Independent Accident Investigation: A Modern Safety Tool,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, 111(1-3): 3944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoop, John A. and Kahan, James P.. 2005. “Flying Is the Safest Way to Travel: How Aviation Was a Pioneer in Independent Accident Investigation.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 5(2): 115–28.Google Scholar
Stoop, John A. and Roed-Larsen, Sverre. 2009. “Public Safety Investigations—A New Evolutionary Step in Safety Enhancement?Reliability Engineering & System Safety, ESREL 2007, the 18th European Safety and Reliability Conference, 94(9): 1471–79.Google Scholar
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan. 2010. “Reflection in the Shadow of Blame: When Do Politicians Appoint Commissions of Inquiry?British Journal of Political Science 40 (03): 613–34. doi:10.1017/S0007123410000049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swuste, P. 2013. “A ‘Normal Accident’ with a Tower Crane? An accident analysis conducted by the Dutch Safety Board,” Safety Science. 57 (August): 276–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tama, Jordan. 2011. “Three Cheers for Blue-Ribbon Panels.” The Wilson Quarterly 35 (3): 3034.Google Scholar
Tama, Jordan. 2014. “Crises, Commissions, and Reform: The Impact of Blue-Ribbon Panels.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 152–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, Jane, and Nantel, Kelly. 2014. Interview with Jane Terry and Kelly Nantel of the National Transportation Safety Board In-person interview.
The Sun (Baltimore, MD). 1940. Flyers to Carry Fight to Congress, April 30: 13.
US Senate. 1926. 69th Congress S41 An Act To Encourage and Regulate the Use of Aircraft in Commerce, and for Other Purposes. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
US Senate. 1932. Safety in Air: Hearings Before the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Subcommittee on S. Res. 146, 74th Congress, Second Session, on Feb. 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 20, 21, Apr. 6, 1936 and 75th Congress, First Session, on Jan.13, Feb. 2, 6, 1937. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
US Senate. 1940. Select Committee on Government Organization. A Resolution Disapproving Reorganization Plan Numbered IV. Hearing May 9. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office: Z10.
US Senate Subcommittee of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Study of Operation of Civil Aeronautics Administration, Hearings. Jan 4, 5, 9, 10, 12, 24, Feb 3, 20, 21, March 5, 17 and May 28, 1956. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
van den Akker, J. A., and Lange, E. M. R.. 2014. “Towards a European Approach to Food Fraud,” Judicial Explorations 40(2): 8496.Google Scholar
van Vollenhoven, Pieter, Chairman, Dutch Safety Board. 2001. “Independent Accident Investigation: Every Citizen’s Right, Society’s Duty,” Speech at the 3rd European Transport Safety Lecture, Jan. 23.
Vietor, Richard H. K. 1990. “Contrived Competition: Airline Regulation and Deregulation,” Business History Review. 64(1): 61108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorderbrueggen, John. 2014. National Transportation Safety Board. In-person interview.
Wallace, Wanda A. 1994. “The National Transportation Safety Board as a Prototype for a More Effective Quality Control Inquiry Committee,” Accounting Horizons 8(1): 90104.Washington Post. 1941. “Fledgling CAA Struggles Under Weight of Fifth Fatal Crash,” Washington Post, March 1: 8.Google Scholar
Washington Post. 1997. “Chemical Safety Panel Survives Veto Pen,” Washington Post, Nov. 4: A15.
Wolanin, Thomas R. 1975. Presidential Advisory Commissions: Truman to Nixon. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. 2010. Rethinking Risk Management Practices in Finance: Practices from Other Domains. New York: World Economic Forum.
Zukowska, J., Michalski, L., and Krystek, R.. 2010. “The Value of Independent Investigations Within Integrated Transport Safety Systems,” Scientific Journals, 20(92).Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×