Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-jqctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-01T03:49:04.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - From Santa Barbara to the Exxon Valdez

Policy Learning and the Emergence of a New Regime for Managing Oil Spill Risk1

from Part II - Case Studies on Offshore Oil Spills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2017

Edward J. Balleisen
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Lori S. Bennear
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Kimberly D. Krawiec
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Jonathan B. Wiener
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Policy Shock
Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises
, pp. 149 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, H. C. 1994. Toxic Debts and the Superfund Dilemma. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., and Jones, B. D. 1993. Agendas and Stability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. 1998. Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18 (1), 5374.Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A., and DeYoung, S. E. 2011. Emergency Response, Doctrinal Confusion, and Federalism in the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Publius, 41 (3), 471–93.Google Scholar
Blake, G. 1969. Union Oil Co. May Not Be Liable for Damage Caused by Big Leak. Los Angeles Times, A1.Google Scholar
Busenberg, G. J. 2001. Learning in Organizations and Public Policy. Journal of Public Policy, 21 (2), 173189.Google Scholar
Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. Jr. 1990, June 29. Conferees Agree on Bill to Cover Cost of Oil Spills. New York Times, 1.Google Scholar
Economy Dominates Public’s Agenda, Dim Hopes for the Future. 2011. Pew Research Center for the People and The Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, M. A. 1993. Regulatory Politics in Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, M. A. 2007. Governing the Environment: The Transformation of Environmental Protection. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Eubank, S. R. 1994. Patchwork Justice: State Unlimited Liability Laws in the Wake of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Maryland Journal of International Law, 18 (2), 149–71.Google Scholar
Farmbry, K. 2012. Crisis, Disaster, and Risk: Institutional Response and Emergence. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Frome, M. 1992. Regreening the National Parks (Vol. 31). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2010. Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Retrieved from www.gallup.com/poll/140978/oil-spill-gulf-mexico.aspx.Google Scholar
Garrett, T. L. 1979. Federal Liability for Spills of Oil and Hazardous Substances Under the Clean Water Act. Natural Resources Lawyer, 12 (4), 693719.Google Scholar
Gill, D. A., Picou, J. S., and Ritchie, L. A. 2011. The Exxon Valdez and BP Oil Spills: A Comparison on Initial Social and Psychological Impacts. American Behavioral Scientist, 56 (1), 323.Google Scholar
Graetz, M. J. 2011. The End of Energy: The Unmaking of America’s Environment, Security, and Independence. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, L., and Dye, L. 1969. Backers Say 40,000 Petition to End Offshore Oil Drilling. Los Angeles Times, A1.Google Scholar
Grumbles, B. H., and Manley, J. M. 1995. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Legislation in the Wake of Crisis. Natural Resources and Environment, 10 (2), 3542.Google Scholar
Hager, G. 1989a, May 20. Deadlock Likely to Continue. CQ Weekly, 1183.Google Scholar
Hager, G. 1989b, April 8. Spill May Halt Drilling Bill, Help Liability Efforts. CQ Weekly.Google Scholar
Hall, R. M. Jr. 1978. The Clean Water Act of 1977. Natural Resources Lawyer, 11 (2), 343–72.Google Scholar
Harris, R. A., and Milkis, S. M. 1996. The Politics of Regulatory Change: A Tale of Two Agencies, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hickel, W. J. 1971. Who Owns America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. L. 1969, February 6. Oil Firm Official Defends Drilling at Senate Hearing. Los Angeles Times, A1 and A34.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. W., and Frickel, S. 2011. Ecological Threat and the Founding of the US National Environmental Movement Organizations, 1962–1998. Social Problems, 58 (3), 305–29.Google Scholar
Jones, J. M. 2011, March 17. Americans Increasingly Prioritize Economy over Environment: Largest Margin in Favor of Economy in Nearly 30-Year History of the Trend. Retrieved from Gallup Politics: www.gallup.com/poll/146681/Americans-Increasingly-Prioritize-Economy-Environment.aspx.Google Scholar
Jones, J. M. 2012, March 23. Americans Split on Energy vs. Environmental Trade-Off. Retrieved from Gallup Politics: www.gallup.com/poll/153404/Americans-Split-Energy-Environment-Trade-Off.aspx.Google Scholar
Keener, K. C. 1971. Federal Water Pollution Legislation and Regulations with Particular Reference to the Oil Industry. Natural Resources Lawyer, 4 (3), 492.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, E. 1970, April 4. Curb on Oil Spills Is Signed by Nixon: New Law Raises Penalties and Expands Liabilities. New York Times, 28.Google Scholar
Kim, I. 2002. Financial Responsibility Rules under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Natural Resources Journal, 42, 591.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
Klass, A. B. 2004. From Reservoirs to Remediation: The Impact of CERCLA on Common Law Strict Liability Environmental Claims. Wake Forest Law Review, 39, 904–70.Google Scholar
Knopf, C. D. 2011. What’s Included in the Exclusion: Understanding Superfund’s Petroleum Exclusion. Fordham Environmental Law Review, 5 (1), 342.Google Scholar
Kuntz, P. 1990. Conferees Break Logjam. CQ Weekly, 2042.Google Scholar
Lenckus, D. 1996. Exxon Seeks More Spill Cover: Oil Giant Reaches Partial Agreement with Insurers. Business Insurance, 1.Google Scholar
McCoy, C., and Wells, K. 1989. Alaska, US Knew of Flaws in Oil-Spill Response Plans. Wall Street Journal, A3.Google Scholar
Meltz, R., Ramseur, J., and Pettit, C. 2010. Questions Regarding Liability Under the Oil Pollution Act and the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. Congressional Research Service, 5, 8.Google Scholar
Mohr, H., Pritchard, J., and Lush, T. 2010, June 9. BP’s Gulf Oil Spill Response Plan Lists the Walrus as a Local Species. Christian Science Monitor.Google Scholar
Moss, D. A. 2002. When All Else Fails: Government as the Ultimate Risk Manager. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Murchison, K. M. 2011. Liability Under the Oil Pollution Act: Current Law and Needed Revisions. Louisiana Law Review, 71 (3), 917–56.Google Scholar
National Pollution Funds Center. 2008. Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, Annual Report, FY 2004-FY2008. Washington DC: US Coast Guard, National Pollution Funds Center.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. E. 2010. Oil Pollution Act of 1990(OPA): Liability of Responsible Parties. CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Oil Spills and Cleanup Bills: Federal Recovery of Oil Spill Cleanup Costs. 1980. Harvard Law Review, 93 (8), 1761–85.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, G. 1993. Marine Spill Response Corporation (MSRC): How it Hopes to Fill the Oil Recovery Requirements of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island.Google Scholar
Pfennigstorf, W. 1979. Environment, Damages, and Compensation. Journal of the American Bar Foundation, 4 (2), 347448.Google Scholar
Pollution: Deadly Blanket of Blackness. 1969, February 9. Los Angeles Times. G5.Google Scholar
Ramseur, J. L. 2010. Oil Spills in US Coastal Waters: Background, Governance, and Issues for Congress. CRS Report for Congress, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Randle, R. V. 1991. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Its Provisions, Intent, and Effects. Environmental Law Reporter, 3 (91), 10119–35.Google Scholar
Rawl: In Ten Years You’ll See Nothing. 1989. Fortune, 119 (10), 50.Google Scholar
Rich, S. 1969, February 19. Tight Rules Imposed on Oil Drilling. Washington Post, A5.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). 2007. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schenke, D. L. 1990. Liability for Damages Arising from an Oil Spill. Natural Resources and the Environment, 4 (4), 1416.Google Scholar
Stone, A. G. 1975. The Trans-Alaska Pipeline and Strict Liability for Oil Pollution Damage. Urban Law Annual, 9 (1), 179201.Google Scholar
The Loss of a Few Birds. 1969. Washington Post, A22.Google Scholar
US Coast Guard. 2012) Polluting Incidents In and Around US Waters. A Spill/Release Compendium: 1969–2011. Washington DC: United States Coast Guard.Google Scholar
US Energy Information Administration. (2012). Annual Energy Review.Google Scholar
Wald, M. 1991, September 5. Oil Spill Organization Gearing Up. New York Times.Google Scholar
Wang, H. 2011. Civil Liability for Marine Oil Pollution Damage: A Comparative and Economic Study of the International, US and Chinese Compensation Regimes. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Wells, K., and McCoy, C. 1989. How Unpreparedness Turned the Alaska Spill into Ecological Debacle. Wall Street Journal, A1.Google Scholar
White, M. A. 1995. Investor Response to the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Working Paper, University of Virginia, McIntire School of Commerce.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, J. A. 1999. Inadequacies of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990: Why the United States Should Adopt the Convention on Civil Liability. Fordham International Law Journal, 23 (5), 14991539.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×