Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-ckh7h Total loading time: 1.5 Render date: 2022-07-05T01:44:42.937Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Part I - The Conceptual Terrain of Crises and Risk Perceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2017

Edward J. Balleisen
Duke University, North Carolina
Lori S. Bennear
Duke University, North Carolina
Kimberly D. Krawiec
Duke University, North Carolina
Jonathan B. Wiener
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Policy Shock
Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises
, pp. 1 - 40
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Allais, M. 1953. “Le Comportement de L’homme Rationnel Devant Le Risquye, Critique Des Postulats et Axioms de L’ecole Americaine.” Econometrica 21: 503–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, F., and Aumann, R.. 1963. “A Definition of Subjective Probability.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34: 199205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J., and Lind, R. C.. 1970. “Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions.” American Economic Review 60: 364–78.Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., and Rabin, M.. 2003. Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, G. A., and Withey, S. B.. 1981. “Perspectives on Risk Perceptions.” Risk Analysis 1: 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, C. W. 2011. Cost-Benefit and Other Analysis Requirements in the Rulemaking Process. #R41974.
Dalkey, N. C. 1969. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. #RM-5888-PR.
DellaVigna, S. 2009. “Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 315–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. 2011. The Finanical Crisis Inquiry Report: Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Finanical And Economic Crisis in the United States. Washington, DC.
Helmer-Hirschberg, O. 1967. Analysis of the Future: The Delphi Method. #P-3558.
Hirshleifer, J. 1964. “Efficient Allocation of Capital in an Uncertain World.” American Economic Review 54: 7785.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A.. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 47 (2): 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R.. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
National Commission, on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. 2011. “Deep Water: The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future of Offshore Drilling.”
Office of Management and Budget. 2003. Circular A-4, Regulatory Analysis. Washington, DC.
Rowe, G., and Wright, G.. 2001. “Differences in Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk: Myth or Reality?Risk Analysis 21 (2): 341–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandman, P. M., Weinstein, N. D., and Klotz, M. L.. 1987. “Public Response to Risk from Geological Radon.” Journal of Communication 37 (3): 93108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science 236: 280–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, P., Malmfors, T., Krewski, D., Mertz, C. K., Neil, N., and Bartlett, S.. 1995. “Intuitive Toxicology II. Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks in Canada.” Risk Analysis15 15: 661–75.Google Scholar
US House of Representatives. 2006. A Failure of Initiative: Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. Washington, D.C.
von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O.. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, N., and Klaes, M.. 2012. An Introduction to Behavioral Economics. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, G., and Bolger, F.. 1992. “Introduction.” In Expertise and Decision Support, edited by Wright, G. and Bolger, F.. New York: Plenum, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Advisen (2006). Earthquake: The Other Insurance Crisis. Advisen LtD.
Amy, J. (2010). “Farmers insurance to drop wind coverage from 10,000 coastal policyholders.” (Birmingham, AL). Scholar
Andriotis, A. M. (2012). “Home Insurance Goes Through the Roof.” The Wall Street Journal Market Watch, March 9. Scholar
Angbazo, L. A. and Narayanan, R. (1996). “Catastrophic Shocks in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry: Evidence on Regulatory and Contagion Effects.” The Journal of Risk and Insurance 63(4): 619–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, B. (2012). “Insurers Forced to Rethink Tornado Coverage.” Chicago Tribune, March 7.
Booz Allen Hamilton (2010). The Offshore Oil and Gas Industry Report in Insurance – Part One, Report funded by the Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory.
Brown, J. R., Cummins, J. D., Lewis, C. M. and Wei, R. (2004). “An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Impact of Federal Terrorism Reinsurance.” Journal of Monetary Economics 51: 861–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. J. and Hoyt, R. E. (2000). “The Demand for Flood Insurance: Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20(3): 291306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffet, W. E. (2002). Letter to Shareholders. Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2001 Annual Report.
CBO (2007). Federal Reinsurance for Terrorism Risks: Issues in Reauthorization. Washington, DC, Congressional Budget Office.
CEA (2010). Annual Report to the Legislature and Insurance Commissioner on Program and Operations. Sacramento, CA, California Earthquake Authority.
Charpentier, A. (2008). “Insurability of Climate Risks.” The Geneva Papers 33: 91109.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. D. (2006). “Should the Government Provide Insurance for Catastrophes?Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review July/August: 337–56.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. D. and Lewis, C. M. (2003). “Catastrophic Events, Parameter Uncertainty and the Breakdown of Implicit Long-Term Contracting: The Case of Terrorism Insurance.” The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26(2/3): 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. D., Dionne, G., Gagne, R. and Nouira, A. (2008). The Costs and Benefits of Reinsurance. CIRRELT-2008-26. Montreal, Université de Montréal, Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics, and Transportation.Google Scholar
Ericson, R. V. and Doyle, A. (2004). Uncertain Business: Risk, Insurance, and the Limits of Knowledge. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fier, S. G. and Carson, J. M. (2010). Catastrophes and the Demand for Life Insurance. Working Paper, available at SSRN:
Fineout, G. (2010). “Truce Reached with State Farm Florida; Citizens Property Insurance Corp. Could Grow Due to Deal.” Florida Underwriter. 27(1): 24. Scholar
Fleckenstein, M. (2006). Rating Agency Recalibrations. In The Review: Cedant’s Guide to Renewals 2006. London: Informa UK Limited: 4043.Google Scholar
Froot, K. A. (2008). “The Intermediation of Financial Risks: Evolution in the Catastrophe Reinsurance Market.” Risk Management and Insurance Review 11(2): 281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froot, K. A. and O’Connell, P. G. J. (1997). On the Pricing of Intermediated Risks: Theory and Application to Catastrophe Reinusurance. NBER Working Paper 6011. Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRef
GAO (2007). Public Policy Options for Changing the Federal Role in Natural Catastrophe Insurance. Washington, DC, United States Government Accountability Office
Gray, A. (2012). “Catlin Warns of Disaster Insurance Rates.” Financial Times, February 9.
Holmes, T. P., Huggett, R. J. Jr. and Westerling, A. L. (2008). Statistical Analysis of Large Wildfires. In The Economics of Forest Disturbances: Wildfires, Storms, and Invasive Species, edited by Holmes, T. P., Prestemon, J. P. and Abt, K. L.. Springer Science: 5977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insurance Information Institute (2009). Catastrophes: Insurance Issues. Issues Updates. New York, NY, Insurance Information Institute.
Jaffee, D. M. and Russell, T. (1997). “Catastrophe Insurance, Capital Markets, and Uninsurable Risks.” The Journal of Risk and Insurance 64(2): 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffee, D. M. and Russell, T. (2003). Markets Under Stress: The Case of Extreme Event Insurance. In Economics for an Imperfect World: Essays in Honor of Joseph E. Stiglitz, edited by Arnott, R., Greenwald, B., Kanbur, R. and Nalebuff, B.. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press: 3552.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A., eds. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. W. (2005). A Regulator’s Introduction to the Insurance Industry. Kansas City, MO, National Association of Insurance Commissioners.Google Scholar
Klein, R. W. (2009). Hurricane Risk and the Regulation of Property Insurance Markets. Atlanta, GA, Center for RMI Research, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
Kousky, C. (2011). “Managing the Risk of Natural Catastrophes: The Role and Functioning of State Insurance Programs.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5(1): 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousky, C. and Cooke, R. (2012). “Explaining the Failure to Insure Catastrophic Risks.” The Geneva Papers 37: 206–27.Google Scholar
Kousky, C. and Kunreuther, H. (2013). Addressing Affordability in the National Flood Insurance Program. RFF Issue Brief 13-02. Washington, DC, Resources for the Future.CrossRef
Kunreuther, H. and Michel-Kerjan, E. (2005). Insurability of (Mega-)Terrorism Risk: Challenges and Perspectives. Terrorism Risk: Insurance in OECD Countries. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris, France, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H. and Pauly, M. (2005). Insurance Decision-Making and Market Behavior. Foundation and Trends in Microeconomics, vol 1, no 2. Hanover, MA, Now Publishers, Inc.: 63127.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H. C., Pauly, M. V. and McMorrow, S. (2013). Insurance & Behavioral Economics: Improving Decisions in the Most Misunderstood Industry. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahul, O. and White, E. (2013). Earthquake Risk Insurance. Knowledge Note 6-2: The economics of disaster risk, risk management, and risk financing, Washington, DC, World Bank.
Marsh (2010). The Marsh Report: Terrorism Risk Insurance 2010. New York, NY, Marsh.
Max, S. (2001). “Is Travel Insurance Worth It?CNN, October 9. Scholar
McChristian, L. (2012). Hurricane Andrew and Insurance: The Enduring Impact of an Historic Storm. Tampa, FL, Insurance Information Institute.Google Scholar
Michel-Kerjan, E. and Kousky, C. (2010). “Come Rain or Shine: Evidence on Flood Insurance Purchases in Florida.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 77(2): 369–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, T. S. (1992). “Florida Agency Orders Freeze on Insurer’s Rates.” Los Angeles Times, September 10. Scholar
Munich Re (2012). ‘This Is Totally Different from Anything We Have Ever Experienced’. Topics Geo 2011: 1219.
NAPCO LLC (2006). The Impact of Changes to the RMS U.S. Hurricane Catastrophe Model. Iselin, NJ, NAPCO LLC.
Newman, M. E. J. (2005). “Power Laws, Pareto Distributions and Zipf’s Law.” Contemporary Physics 46(5): 323–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, J. (2012). “Insurance to Cost More in Areas Hit by Natural Disasters.” Asia One: The Business Times, February 5.
RMS (2004). Northridge Earthquake 10-Year Retrospective. Newark, CA, Risk Management Solutions.
RMS (2005). Hurricane Katrina: Profile of a Super Cat: Lessons and Implications for Catastrophe Risk Management. Newark, CA, Risk Management Solutions.
RMS (2008). Terrorism Risk: 7-Year Retrospective, 7-Year Future Perspective. Newark, CS, Risk Management Solutions.
Schaad, W. (2002). Terrorism – Dealing With the New Spectre. Zurich, Swiss Reinsurance Company.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, F. P., Peng, R. and Woods, J. (2003). “On the Distribution of Wildfire Sizes.” Environmetrics 14(6): 583–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahel, W. R. (2003). “The Role of Insurability and Insurance.” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 28(3): 374–81.Google Scholar
Stroud, M. (2012). “As Weather Gets Biblical, Insurers Go Missing.” Reuters, April 11.
Swiss, Re (2005). Innovating to Insure the Uninsurable. Sigma. Zurich, Swiss Reinsurance Company.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1973). “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5: 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, C. (2009). The California Earthquake Authority. New York, NY, Insurance Information Institute.Google Scholar
Woo, G. (1999). The Mathematics of Natural Catastrophes. London, Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., and Read, D. (1994). What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models. Risk Analysis 14, 959–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bracha, A., and Weber, E. U. (2012). A Psychological Perspective on Control, Uncertainty, Risk, and Panic. Working Paper, Center for Decision Sciences.
Clayton, M. (2011). Germany to Phase Out Nuclear Power. Could the US Do the Same? Christian Science Monitor. June 7. Scholar
Clemens, R. T. (1997). Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dake, K. (1991). Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk: An Analysis of Contemporary Worldviews and Cultural Biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 22: 6182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. E., and Van Liere, K. D (1978). The New Environmental Paradigm: A Proposed Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results, Journal of Environmental Education 9: 1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, H. J. (1986). Accepting Error to Make Less Error. Journal of Personality Assessment 50(3): 387–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erev, I., and Barron, G. (2005). On Adaptation, Maximization, and Reinforcement Learning among Cognitive Strategies. Psychological Review 112(4): 912–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Nicholson, N., Soane, E., and Willman, P. (2003). Trading on Illusions: Unrealistic Perceptions of Control and Trading Performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 76(1):5368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., and Johnson, S. M. (2000). The Affect Heuristic in Judgements of Risks and Benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 117.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J., Marx, S., and Weber, E. U. (2004). The Role of Climate Perceptions, Expectations, and Forecasts in Farmer Decision Making: The Argentine Pampas and South Florida. Technical Report 04–01. Palisades, NY: International Research Institute for Climate Prediction (IRI).Google Scholar
Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., and Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice. Psychological Science 15(8): 534–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huberman, G. (2001). Familiarity Breeds Investment. Review of Financial Studies 14 (3): 659–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (2000). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding: A Critical Edition. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Atomic Energy Association. (2008). 50 Years of Nuclear Energy.
Kahneman, D. (2003). “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.” American Economic Review 93(5): 1449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., and Ratick, S. (1988). The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis 8: 177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. (2011). Hormone-Replacement Follies: A Brief History. Huffington Post, April 13.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Washington, DC: Beard Books (reprinted 2002).Google Scholar
Kupperman, K. O. (1982). The Puzzle of the American Climate in the Early Colonial Period. The American Historical Review 87: 1262–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, E. J. (1975). The Illusion of Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(2): 311–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, E. J., and Roth, J. (1975). Heads I Win, Tails it’s Chance: The Illusion of Control as a Function of the Sequence of Outcomes in a Purely Chance Task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(6): 951–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values. Climatic Change 77: 4572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Y.U.S. of Forestry, E. Studies, Y.P. on C. Change, and G.M.U.C. for C.C. Communication (2008). Global Warming’s“ Six America”: An Audience Segmentation. New Haven: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., and Welch, N. (2001). Risk as Feelings. Psychological Bulletin 127(2): 267–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leone, R. C. and Anrig, G. Jr (2003). The War on Our Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New York: Century Foundation.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., and Weber, E. U. (1986). An Axiomatic Theory of Conjoint, Expected Risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 30: 188205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance 7: 7791.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Gärling, T., and Slovic, P. (2006). Affect and Decision Making: A “Hot” Topic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19: 7985. doi: 10.1002/bdm.528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center (2009). Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Samuelson, W., and Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1): 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarin, R. K., and Weber, M. (1993). Risk–Value Models. European Journal of Operations Research 70: 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theory and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25). New York: Academic Press, pp. 165.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On Depression, Development and Death. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk, Journal of Finance, 19(3): 425–42.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of Risk. Science 236: 280–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. E. (1983), Adjustment to Threatening Events: A Theory of Cognitive Adaptation, American Psychologist, 38 (11): 1161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. E., and Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and Well-Being: A Social Psychological Perspective On Mental-Health. Psychological Bulletin 103(2): 193210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4): 297323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (1944/1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, E. H. (1834). De pulsu, resorptione, auditu et tactu. Anatationes anatomicae et physiologicae. Leipzig: Koehler.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U. (1994). From Subjective Probabilities to Decision Weights: The Effect of Asymmetric Loss Functions on the Evaluation of Uncertain Outcomes and Events. Psychological Bulletin, 115: 228–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. U. (1997). Perception and Expectation of Climate Change: Precondition for Economic and Technological Adaptation. In Bazerman, M., Messick, D., Tenbrunsel, A., and Wade-Benzoni, K. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives to Environmental and Ethical Issues in Management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 314–41.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U. (2001). Decision and Choice: Risk, Empirical Studies. In Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Limited, pp. 13347–51.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming Does Not Scare Us (Yet). Climatic Change 77: 103–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. U. (2010). Risk Attitude and Preference. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(1): 7988.Google ScholarPubMed
Weber, E. U., Blais, A. -R., and Betz, N. (2002). A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15: 263–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, E. U., and Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful Judgment and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology 60: 5386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., and Blais, A.–R. (2004). Predicting Risk-Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation. Psychological Review 111(2): 430–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, E. U., Siebenmorgen, N., and Weber, M. (2005). Communicating Asset Risk: How Name Recognition and the Format of Historic Volatility Information Affect Risk Perception and Investment Decisions. Risk Analysis 25(3): 597609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, E. U., and Stern, P. C. (2011). Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States. American Psychologist 66: 315–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, N. D., Lyon, J. E., Rothman, A. J. and Cuite, C. L. (2000). Preoccupation and Affect as Predictors of Protective Action Following Natural Disaster. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5: 351–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yechiam, E., Barron, G., and Erev, I. (2005). The Role of Personal Experience in Contributing to Different Patterns of Response to Rare Terrorist Attacks. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49: 430–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaval, L., Keenan, E. A., Johnson, E. J., and Weber, E. U. (2014). How Warm Days Lead to Increased Belief in Global Warming. Nature Climate Change. 4(2): 143–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Béland, Daniel. 2005. “Ideas and Social Policy: An Institutionalist Perspective.” Social Policy & Administration 39 (1): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, Daniel, and Hacker, Jacob S.. 2004. “Ideas, Private Institutions and American Welfare State ‘Exceptionalism’: The Case of Health and Old-Age Insurance, 1915–1965.” International Journal of Social Welfare 13 (1): 4254. doi:10.1111/j.1369-6866.2004.00296.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 2003. News, The Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 1998. “Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting.” Journal of Public Policy 18 (1)(April): 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 2004. “Learning and Policy Improvement After Disaster: The Case of Aviation Security.” American Behavioral Scientist 48 (3): 341–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 2006. Lessons of Disaster. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 2011. An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy-Making. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A., and Lawrence, Regina G.. 2002. “The Social and Political Meaning of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.” Spill Science & Technology Bulletin 7 (1-2)(June): 1722. doi:10.1016/S1353-2561(02)00049-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkland, Thomas A. 2009. “Media Framing and Policy Change After Columbine.” American Behavioral Scientist 52 (10): 1405–25. doi:10.1177/0002764209332555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnier, DeLysa. 1994. “Constructing Political Reality: Language, Symbols, and Meaning in Politics: A Review Essay.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (1): 239–53.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel, and Sin, Gisela. 2007. “Policy Tragedy and the Emergence of Regulation: The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938: 1.” Studies in American Political Development 21 (2): 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, Roger W., and Elder, Charles D.. 1983. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, Roger W., and Primo, David M.. 2003. The Plane Truth: Airline Crashes, the Media, and Transportation Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Cobb, Roger W., and Ross, Marc Howard. 1997. Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial: Avoidance, Attack, and Redefinition. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1)(March 1): 125. doi:10.2307/2392088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray J. 1967. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray J. 1988. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Classification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 42 (4): 5159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glascock, Jack. 2004. “The Jasper Dragging Death: Crisis Communication and the Community Newspaper.” Communication Studies 55 (1): 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, Valerie J. 2005. “News Media and Technological Risks: The Case of Pesticides After.” Sociological Quarterly 46 (4): 671–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 1998. “The Historical Logic of National Health Insurance: Structure and Sequence in the Development of British, Canadian, and U.S. Medical Policy.” Studies in American Political Development 12 (01): 57130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgartner, James, and Bosk, Charles. 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice : Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. Longman Classics in Political Science. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G. 2000. The Politics of Force: Media and the Construction of Police Brutality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G., and Birkland, Thomas A.. 2004. “Guns, Hollywood, and School Safely: Defining the School-Shooting Problem Across Public Arenas.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (5): 11931207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’.” Public Administration Review 19: 7988.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1979. “Still Muddling, Not Yet Through.” Public Administration Review 39: 517–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Liu, Xinsheng, Lindquist, Eric, and Vedlitz, Arnold. 2011. “Explaining Media and Congressional Attention to Global Climate Change, 1969–2005: An Empirical Test of Agenda-Setting Theory.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (2): 405–19. doi:10.1177/1065912909346744.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 1989. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
May, Peter J. 1990. “Reconsidering Policy Design: Policies and Publics.” Journal of Public Policy 11 (2): 187206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Peter J. 1992. “Policy Learning and Failure.” Journal of Public Policy 12 (4)(December): 331–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Peter J., Jochim, Ashley E., and Sapotichne, Joshua. 2011. “Constructing Homeland Security: An Anemic Policy Regime.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (2)(May): 285307. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00408.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 1997. “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3)(July): 738–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and Vergari, Sandra. 1998. “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms.” The Journal of Politics 60 (01): 126–48. doi:10.2307/2648004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, Charles. 1999. Normal Accidents: Living with High-risk Technologies, with a New Afterword and a Postscript on the Y2K Problem. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. 1993. “Policy Change over a Decade or More.” In Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A., and Jenkins-Smith, Hank. 1999. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment.” In Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul, Jenkins-Smith, Hank, and Lawlor, Edward F.. 1996. “Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15 (1): 110–46.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1975. The Semisovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1991. “The Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87(2): 334–48.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Ben. 2011. “Mitigating Terror and Avoidance Behavior Through the Risk Perception Matrix to Augment Resilience.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 8 (1)(January 24). doi:10.2202/1547-7355.1840. Scholar
Simon, Herbert Alexander. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational; Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Society Setting. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science 236 (4799)(April 17): 280–85. doi:10.1126/science.3563507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, Deborah A. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. 2002. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1977. “Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7: 423–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. and Burt, C.. 1933. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 3(2): 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., and Jones, B. D.. 2010. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benford, R. D., and Snow, D. A.. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual review of sociology: 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, L. 1983. News, The Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Best, J. and Horiuchi, G. T.. 1985. The Razor Blade in the Apple: The Social Construction of Urban Legends. Social Problems, 32(5): 488–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkland, T. A., 1998. Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting. Journal of Public Policy 18(01): 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, A., 1972. Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue-Attention Cycle. The Public Interest (28): 3850.Google Scholar
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Edelman, M.J., 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M., 1993. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R. M., 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P., 2001. Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A., 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E., 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J., 2004. All the News That’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, B., 1977. Narrative as a Primary Act of Mind. In Meek, M., Warlow, A., and Barton, G. (eds.), The Cool Web: The Pattern of Children’s Reading. London: Bodley Head: 1223.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. and Overholser, G.. 2010. Science and the Media. Washington, DC: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Scholar
Kingdon, J. W., 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kotre, J., 1996. White Gloves: How We Create Ourselves Through Memory. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., and Welch, N.. 2001. Risk as Feelings. Psychological bulletin, 127(2): 267–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacIntyre, A. C. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN : University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, F. W. 2014. Narrative Politics: Stories and Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P., 2001. The Psychology of Life Stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2): 100–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. J., Potts, R., Fung, H., Hoogstra, L., and Mintz, J.. 1990. Narrative Practices and the Social Construction of Self in Childhood. American Ethnologist, 17(2): 292311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, B. J., 1986. Making an Issue of Child Abuse: Political Agenda Setting for Social Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. E., 2011. Out of Order: An Incisive and Boldly Original Critique of the News Media’s Domination of America’s Poliical Process. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C., 1987. “The Mind as a Consuming Organ. In Elster, Jon, (ed.) The Multiple Self, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 177–98.Google Scholar
Shiffman, D., 2013. Swimming with Sharks: Was Diana Nyad Really at Risk of Being Bitten During Her Historic Swim. Slate. September 4. Scholar
Slovic, P. E. 1987. Perception of Risk. Science 236: 280–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovic, P. E., 2000. The Perception of Risk. New York: Earthscan publications.Google ScholarPubMed
Stone, D. A., 1988. Policy Paradox and Political Reason. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Tilly, C., 2002. Stories, Identities, and Political Change. Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157): 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211(4481): 453–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats