Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- List of acronyms and abbreviations
- PART I Engineering issues specific to entry probes, landers or penetrators
- PART II Previous atmosphere/surface vehicles and their payloads
- PART III Case studies
- Appendix Some key parameters for bodies in the Solar System
- Bibliography
- References
- Index
Appendix - Some key parameters for bodies in the Solar System
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- List of acronyms and abbreviations
- PART I Engineering issues specific to entry probes, landers or penetrators
- PART II Previous atmosphere/surface vehicles and their payloads
- PART III Case studies
- Appendix Some key parameters for bodies in the Solar System
- Bibliography
- References
- Index
Summary
Atmosphere models
Clearly the design of heatshields and parachute systems requires assumptions on the density structure of the atmosphere to be encountered. Thus atmospheric models must be constructed as a design basis – these models must provide the extreme range of conditions likely to be encountered, since extremes in any direction may drive the design.
Where in situ data from prior missions is available (e.g. at Mars and Venus) this of course adds considerable confidence to the model. More generally, as for the first missions to Mars, Titan, Jupiter, etc., the major source of guidance is an atmospheric refractivity profile derived from radio-occultations by prior flyby or orbiter missions. The refractivity may be converted into a mass–density profile with some assumptions on composition. However, the altitudes probed by radio occultations are generally lower than those at which peak aerodynamic heating and deceleration occur, so some assumptions must be made in propagating those measurements upward. Some of these assumptions are rather robust, such as hydrostatic equilibrium, while others are less so.
There is in model development an inherent tension, just as in the development of a mission as a whole. The engineer designing the heat shield will just want a definitive answer to the question ‘what is the density at 500 km?’ (or whatever), while the scientist developing a model will wish to acknowledge the widest range of uncertainty – there may be intrinsic measurement errors in a refractivity profile, there are uncertainties in the assumed composition or other factors, there may be diurnal and seasonal variations, and variations with solar activity.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Planetary Landers and Entry Probes , pp. 313 - 315Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007