Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T10:10:27.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - Dichorionic and Higher Order Multiple Gestations

from Section 7 - Pathology of Multiple Gestations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2018

Raymond W. Redline
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Theonia K. Boyd
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Drucilla J. Roberts
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kulkarni, AD, Jamieson, DJ, Jones, HW Jr., Kissin, DM, Gallo, MF, Macaluso, M, Adashi, EY. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2218–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoekstra, C, Zhao, ZZ, Lambalk, CB, Willemsen, G, Martin, NG, Boomsma, DI, Montgomery, GW. Dizygotic twinning. Human reprod update. 2008;14:3747.Google Scholar
Hall, JG. Twinning. Lancet. 2003;362:735–43.Google Scholar
Smits, J, Monden, C. Twinning across the developing world. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25239.Google Scholar
Montgomery, GW, Zhao, ZZ, Marsh, AJ, Mayne, R, Treloar, SA, James, M, Martin, NG, Boomsma, DI, Duffy, DL. A deletion mutation in GDF9 in sisters with spontaneous DZ twins. Twin Res. 2004;7:548–55.Google Scholar
Palmer, JS, Zhao, ZZ, Hoekstra, C, Hayward, NK, Webb, PM, Whiteman, DC, Martin, NG, Boomsma, DI, Duffy, DL, Montgomery, GW. Novel variants in growth differentiation factor 9 in mothers of dizygotic twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4713–6.Google Scholar
Mbarek, H, Steinberg, S, Nyholt, DR, Gordon, SD, Miller, MB, McRae, AF, Hottenga, JJ, Day, FR, Willemsen, G, de Geus, EJ, Davies, GE, Martin, HC, Penninx, BW, Jansen, R, McAloney, K, Vink, JM, Kaprio, J, Plomin, R, Spector, TD, Magnusson, PK, Reversade, B, Harris, RA, Aagaard, K, Kristjansson, RP, Olafsson, I, Eyjolfsson, GI, Sigurdardottir, O, Iacono, WG, Lambalk, CB, Montgomery, GW, McGue, M, Ong, KK, Perry, JR, Martin, NG, Stefansson, H, Stefansson, K, Boomsma, DI. Identification of common genetic variants influencing spontaneous dizygotic twinning and female fertility. American journal of human genetics. 2016;98:898908.Google Scholar
Phelan, MC, Geer, JS, Blackburn, WR. Vascular anastomoses leading to amelia and cutis aplasia in a dizygotic twin pregnancy. Clin Genet. 1998;53:126–30.Google Scholar
van Dijk, BA, Boomsma, DI, de Man, AJ. Blood group chimerism in human multiple births is not rare. Am J Med Genet. 1996;61:264–8.Google Scholar
Pinar, H, Sung, CJ, Oyer, CE, Singer, DB. Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 1996;16:901–7.Google Scholar
De Paepe, ME, Shapiro, S, Young, LE, Luks, FI. Placental weight, birth weight and fetal:placental weight ratio in dichorionic and monochorionic twin gestations in function of gestational age, cord insertion type and placental partition. Placenta. 2015;36:213–20.Google Scholar
Zech, NH, Wisser, J, Natalucci, G, Riegel, M, Baumer, A, Schinzel, A. Monochorionic-diamniotic twins discordant in gender from a naturally conceived pregnancy through postzygotic sex chromosome loss in a 47,XXY zygote. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:759–63.Google Scholar
Machin, G. Non-identical monozygotic twins, intermediate twin types, zygosity testing, and the non-random nature of monozygotic twinning: a review. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2009;151 C:110–27.Google Scholar
Qin, JB, Wang, H, Sheng, X, Xie, Q, Gao, S. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1180–92.Google Scholar
Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, Daly, S, Higgins, JR, Dornan, J, Morrison, JJ, Burke, G, Higgins, S, Dicker, P, Manning, F, Mahony, R, Malone, FD. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:94103.Google Scholar
Kaponis, A, Thanatsis, N, Papadopoulos, V, Decavalas, G. Intertwin estimated fetal weight or crown rump length discordance and adverse perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med. 2016;44:863–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewi, L, Devlieger, R, De Catte, L, Deprest, J. Growth discordance. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:295303.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twins: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:643–8.Google Scholar
Bristow, RE, Shumway, JB, Khouzami, AN, Witter, FR. Complete hydatidiform mole and surviving coexistent twin. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51:705–9.Google Scholar
Vaisbuch, E, Ben-Arie, A, Dgani, R, Perlman, S, Sokolovsky, N, Hagay, Z. Twin pregnancy consisting of a complete hydatidiform mole and co-existent fetus: report of two cases and review of literature. Gynecologic oncology. 2005;98:1923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebire, NJ, Foskett, M, Paradinas, FJ, Fisher, RA, Francis, RJ, Short, D, Newlands, ES, Seckl, MJ. Outcome of twin pregnancies with complete hydatidiform mole and healthy co-twin. Lancet. 2002;359:2165–6.Google Scholar
Massardier, J, Golfier, F, Journet, D, Frappart, L, Zalaquett, M, Schott, AM, Lenoir, VT, Dupuis, O, Hajri, T, Raudrant, D. Twin pregnancy with complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent fetus: obstetrical and oncological outcomes in a series of 14 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;143:84–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemann, I, Bolund, L, Sunde, L. Twin pregnancies with diploid hydatidiform mole and co-existing normal fetus may originate from one oocyte. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2031–5.Google Scholar
Makrydimas, G, Sebire, NJ, Thornton, SE, Zagorianakou, N, Lolis, D, Fisher, RA. Complete hydatidiform mole and normal live birth: a novel case of confined placental mosaicism: case report. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2459–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, AS, Tsai, TC, Soong, YK. Clinical management of a quadruplet pregnancy combining a triplet pregnancy with a classical hydatidiform mole: case report and review of literature. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:1073–6.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, Z, Dirnfeld, M, Abramovici, H, Amit, A, Bronshtein, M, Brandes, JM. Spontaneous fetal reduction in multiple gestations assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99:333–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landy, HJ, Keith, LG. The vanishing twin: a review. Human reprod update. 1998;4:177–83.Google Scholar
Oloyede, OA, Iketubosin, F, Bamgbopa, K. Spontaneous fetal reduction and early pregnancy complications in multiple pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119:5760.Google Scholar
Shek, NW, Hillman, SC, Kilby, MD. Single-twin demise: pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:249–63.Google Scholar
Zhou, L, Gao, X, Wu, Y, Zhang, Z. Analysis of pregnancy outcomes for survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:35–9.Google Scholar
Huang, T, Boucher, K, Aul, R, Rashid, S, Meschino, WS. First and second trimester maternal serum markers in pregnancies with a vanishing twin. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:90–6.Google Scholar
Vlkova, B, Hodosy, J. Vanishing twin as a potential source of bias in non-invasive fetal sex determination: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:1128–31.Google Scholar
Masala, M, Saba, L, Zoppi, MA, Puddu, R, Picciau, A, Capponi, V, Iuculano, A, Monni, G, Rosatelli, MC. Pitfalls in noninvasive fetal RhD and sex determination due to a vanishing twin. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:506–8.Google Scholar
Daw, E. Fetus papyraceus–11 cases. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59:598600.Google Scholar
McNamara, HC, Kane, SC, Craig, JM, Short, RV, Umstad, MP. A review of the mechanisms and evidence for typical and atypical twinning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:172–91.Google Scholar
Callen, DF, Fernandez, H, Hull, YJ, Svigos, JM, Chambers, HM, Sutherland, GR. A normal 46,XX infant with a 46,XX/69,XXY placenta: a major contribution to the placenta is from a resorbed twin. Prenat Diagn. 1991;11:437–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, D, Platt, MJ, Pharoah, PO. Comparative development of surviving co-twins of vanishing twin conceptions, twins and singletons. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007;10:210–5.Google Scholar
Pinborg, A, Lidegaard, O, la Cour Freiesleben, N, Andersen, AN. Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2821–9.Google Scholar
Malinowski, W, Koktysz, R, Stawerski, P. The case of monochorionic twin gestation complicated by intrauterine demise of one fetus in the first trimester. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2005;8:262–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marton, V, Zadori, J, Kozinszky, Z, Kereszturi, A. Prevalences and pregnancy outcome of vanishing twin pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization versus natural conception. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:13991406.Google Scholar
Ong, SS, Zamora, J, Khan, KS, Kilby, MD. Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review. BJOG. 2006;113:992–8.Google Scholar
Hillman, SC, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:928–40.Google Scholar
Shinwell, ES, Haklai, T, Eventov-Friedman, S. Outcomes of multiplets. Neonatology. 2009;95:614.Google Scholar
Martin, JA, Kung, HC, Mathews, TJ, Hoyert, DL, Strobino, DM, Guyer, B, Sutton, SR. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006. Pediatrics. 2008;121:788801.Google Scholar
Schachter, M, Raziel, A, Friedler, S, Strassburger, D, Bern, O, Ron-El, R. Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive techniques: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1264–9.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Avgidou, K, Bakoulas, V, Sebire, NJ, Nicolaides, KH. Risks of miscarriage and early preterm birth in trichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: new data and systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1912–7.Google Scholar
Pinar, H, Stephens, M, Singer, DB, Boyd, TK, Pflueger, SM, Gang, DL, Roberts, DJ, Sung, CJ. Triplet placentas: reference values for weights. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002;5:495–8.Google Scholar
Luke, B, Keith, LG. The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low birth weight, infant mortality and handicap in the United States. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:661–6.Google Scholar
Alexander, GR, Kogan, M, Martin, J, Papiernik, E. What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;41:114–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blickstein, I. Growth aberration in multiple pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005;32:3954, viii.Google Scholar
Pharoah, PO, Cooke, T. Cerebral palsy and multiple births. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996;75:F174–7.Google Scholar
Petterson, B, Nelson, KB, Watson, L, Stanley, F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. BMJ. 1993;307:1239–43.Google Scholar
Geipel, A, Berg, C, Katalinic, A, Plath, H, Hansmann, M, Germer, U, Gembruch, U. Prenatal diagnosis and obstetric outcomes in triplet pregnancies in relation to chorionicity. BJOG. 2005;112:554–8.Google Scholar
Abel, JS, Flock, A, Berg, C, Gembruch, U, Geipel, A. Expectant management versus multifetal pregnancy reduction in higher order multiple pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair and a review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(6):1167–73.Google Scholar
Lewi, L, Deprest, J, Hecher, K. The vascular anastomoses in monochorionic twin pregnancies and their clinical consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:1930.Google Scholar
Wen, SW, Demissie, K, Yang, Q, Walker, MC. Maternal morbidity and obstetric complications in triplet pregnancies and quadruplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:254–8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×