Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:46:59.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Significance of Doing and Suffering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

By
Martin Stone
Edited by
Gerald J. Postema
Gerald J. Postema
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

Introductory: Understanding Tort Law

Nor should we make the same demand for an explanation in all cases. Rather, it is sufficient in some cases to have “the that” shown properly. This is so where “the that” is a first thing and a starting point.

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 1098b1

Negligence cases constitute the largest item of business on the civil side of the nation's trial courts. Yet we lack a theory to explain the social function of the negligence concept.

Posner, A Theory of Negligence

Modern tort law looks out on a situation which is ubiquitous in human affairs and inherent, as a possibility, in the fact of human action: a situation in which the actions of one person are connected to the misfortune of another. Nowhere does the law attach significance to this just as such. Rather, throughout the world today, tort law asks: Is the plaintiff's suffering a consequence of some impropriety on the defendant's part, or is it a mere misfortune, a case of bad luck? As “mere misfortune,” the plaintiff's suffering would be without legal significance, something on par with a natural event, like a destructive turn in the weather. But if there is impropriety – if, for example, the likely prospect of the plaintiff's suffering makes it “negligent” for the defendant to have acted as she did – then the plaintiff is entitled to receive, and the defendant obligated to pay, compensation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Philosophy and the Law of Torts , pp. 131 - 182
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×