Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T06:12:42.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 74 - Pseudometastatic disease from hepatic arterioportal shunts

from Section 9 - Mesenteric vascular

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Atif Zaheer
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Stefan L. Zimmerman
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Medical Centre
Elliot K. Fishman
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Medical Centre
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

Small nodular hepatic early enhancing areas on multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI imaging can mimic malignant pathology. These early enhancing lesions are typically located in the periphery of the liver, measure only a few millimeters and are visible predominantly on the arterial phase of contrast imaging fading to isodensity/intensity on the delayed-phase imaging (Figures 74.1 and 74.2). Importantly, these lesions do not have a corresponding abnormality on the non-contrast T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging (Figure 74.3 and 74.4) and do not demonstrate restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging.

Importance

An arterioportal shunt occurs as result of a direct connection between the hepatic arterial and the portal venous systems and is an important cause of transient hepatic attenuation/intensity difference (THAD/THID). This tends to occur in the presence of diminished portal venous flow as in the case of cirrhosis or due to external factors such as trauma or percutaneous intervention. These pseudolesions have to be differentiated from malignant ones to avoid unwarranted anxiety in patients and to avoid invasive testing such as biopsy or even surgical resection.

Typical clinical scenario

These lesions may be a source of concern in patients with cirrhosis or a known malignancy with hypervascular metastasis such as renal cell carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumors. Due to their small size biopsy is usually not an option and these lesions tend to disappear or remain stable on the follow- up examinations (Figure 74.5).

Differential diagnosis

A small flash-filling hemangioma is typically very bright on T2- weighted MR imaging and typically retains contrast on the more delayed-phase imaging. Hepatocellular carcinoma and even metastatic disease from cancers like renal cell, melanoma or neuroendocrine tumors tend to washout on the venous and delayed-phase imaging and appear as lower density/intensity than the liver. The absence of washout on delayed imaging, peripheral location, small size, and absence of abnormality on T1-, T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging along with long-term stability are features of a benign process such as an arterioportal shunt.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging
Pseudolesions, Artifacts, and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 236 - 238
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ito, K., Fujita, T., Shimizu, A., et al. Multiarterial phase dynamic MRI of small early enhancing hepatic lesions in cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis: differentiating between hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas and pseudolesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 699–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Motosugi, U., Ichikawa, T., Sou, H., et al. Distinguishing hypervascular pseudolesions of the liver from hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256: 151–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Bookstein, J. J., Cho, K. J., Davis, G. B., Dail, D.. Arterioportal communications: observations and hypotheses concerning transsinusoidal and transvasal types. Radiology 1982; 142: 581–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ahn, J. H., Yu, J. S., Hwang, S. H., Chung, J. J., Kim, J. H., Kim, K. W.. Nontumorous arterioportal shunts in the liver: CT and MRI findings considering mechanisms and fate. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 385–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×