Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-rbzxz Total loading time: 1.045 Render date: 2022-05-24T16:58:00.018Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
Patrons, Clients and Policies Patrons, Clients and Policies
Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition
Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

Book contents

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Edited by
Herbert Kitschelt  and
Steven I. Wilkinson
Herbert Kitschelt
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Steven I. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Patrons, Clients and Policies
Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition
 , pp. 344 - 370
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Abós, Alvaro. 1986. El posperonismo. Buenos Aires: Editorial Legasa.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A. 2001. “The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation,” American Economic Review 91: 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adserà, Alicia, and Boix, Carles. 2002. “Trade, democracy, and the size of the public sector: The political underpinnings of openness,” International Organization 56: 229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afanas'ev, M. N. 1997. Klientelizm i Rossiiskaia Gosudarstvennost'. Moscow: Moscow Social Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Aghion, Philippe and Wilkinson, Jeffrey G. 1998. Growth, inequality, and globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alarcón-Olguín, Victor. 1994. “The PRI under Salinas de Gortari's presidency,” Paper prepared for the XVIII International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Atlanta, GA, 10–12 March.
Aldrich, John H. 1993. “Rational choice and turnout,” American Journal of Political Science 37: 246–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why parties? The origin and transformation of party politics in America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Perotti, R. 1996. “Income distribution, political instability, and investment,” European Economic Review 40: 1203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Rodrik, Dani. 1994. “Distributive politics and economic growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 465–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Tabellini, Guido. 1990. “A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt,” Review of Economic Studies 57: 403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Baquir, R. and Easterly, William 1999. “Public goods and ethnic divisions,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 143–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allum, A. 1973. Politics and society in post-war Naples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney. 1965. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Norma. 1999. “Nuevos estilos – viejas costumbres: Las prácticas electorales de la UCR y el PJ en Misiones 1955–1995,” Unpublished manuscript, Department of History, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Argentina.
Amatori, Franco. 2000. “Beyond state and market: Italy's futile search for a third way,” in The rise and fall of state-owned enterprise in the western world (ed.) Tonninelli, Pier Angelo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 128–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1970. “Bases of support for Mexico's dominant party,” American Political Science Review 64:153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1987. Political survival: Politicians and public policy in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The deadlock of democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Santos, Fabiano. 2001, , Fabiano G. M. “The executive connection: Presidentially defined factions and party discipline in Brazil,” Party Politics 7: 213–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apter, David. 1966. The politics of modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Scott and Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan. Forthcoming. “Delivering the goods: Legislative particularism in different electoral and institutional settings,” Journal of Politics 68.
Auyero, Javier. 1998. “Re-membering Peronism: An ethnographic account of the relational character of political memory,” Paper delivered at the XⅪ International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, 24–26 December.
Auyero, Javier. 2000. Poor people's politics. Peronist survival networks and the legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Frederick G. 1957. Caste and the economic frontier. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Frederick G. 1960. Tribe, caste and nation: A study of political activity and political change in highland Orissa. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bajpai, Nirupam and Jeffrey D. Sachs. 1999. “The state of state government finances in India.” Harvard Institute for International Development. Development Discussion Paper No. 719, September. www.cid.harvard.edu/hiid/719.pdf.
Bako-Arifari, Nassirou. 2001. “La corruption au port de Cotonou: Douaniers et intermédiares,” Politique Africaine 83: 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banégas, Richard. 1998. “Marchandisation du vote, citoyenneté et consolidation démocratique au Bénin,” Politique Africaine 69: 75–88.Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward C. 1958. The moral basis of a backward society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward C. and Wilson, James Q. 1963. City politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1965.Google Scholar
Barrett, Patrick S. 2001. “Labour policy, labour-business relations and the transition to democracy in Chile,” Journal of Latin American Studies 33: 561–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. 1997. Determinants of economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barth, Frederik. 1969. “Introduction,” in Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of cultural difference, ed. Barth, Frederik. Boston: Little, Brown and Company: 9–38.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1981. Markets and states in tropical Africa: The political basis of agricultural policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1983. “Modernization, ethnic competition and the rationality of politics in contemporary Africa,” in State versus ethnic claims: African policy dilemmas, ed. Rothchild, Donald and Olorunsola, Victor. Boulder: Westview. 152–71.Google Scholar
Bayart, Jean-François. 1979. L'État au Cameroun. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
Bayart, Jean-François. 1989. L'Etat en Afrique: la politique du ventre. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Bayly, C. A. 1988. Indian society and the making of the British empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belloni, Frank, Caciagli, Mario, and Mattina, Liborio. 1979. “The mass clientelism party: The Christian Democratic Party in Catania and in Southern Italy,” European Journal of Political Research 7: 235–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Allyson Lucinda. 2001. “The stability of provincial party systems in Argentina: Regional economies, revenue sharing, and provinical politics during economic reform,” in “Patronage games: Economic reform, political institutions, and the decline of party stability in Latin America,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Berger, Gordon Mark. 1977. Parties out of power in Japan, 1931–1941. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bezerra, Marcos Otávio. 1999. Em nome das “Bases”, política, favor e dependéncia Pessoal. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará.Google Scholar
Bienen, Henry. 1967. Tanzania: Party transformation and economic development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bienen, Henry. 1974. Kenya: The politics of participation and control. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bienen, Henry. 1979. Armies and parties in Africa. New York: Africana Publishing.Google Scholar
Billiet, Jaak and Huyse, Luc. 1984. “Verzorgingsstaat en Verzuiling: Een Dubbelzinnige Relatie,” Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 5: 129–51.Google Scholar
Blondel, Jean. 1996. “Britain. A textbook case of government – supporting party relationship,” in Party and government: An inquiry into the relationship between governments and supporting parties in liberal democracies, ed. Blondel, Jean and Cotta, Maurizio. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean and Cotta, Maurizio (eds.) 1996. Party and government: An inquiry into the relationship between governments and supporting parties in liberal democracies. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, and Marcus, Alan. 2001. Investments, 5th edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Boissevain, Jeremy. 1977. “When the saints go marching out: Reflections on the decline of patronage in Malta,” in Patrons and clients in Mediterranean societies, ed. Gellner, Ernest and Waterbury, John. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C. 2003. “Endogenous democratization,” World Politics 55: 517–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brass, Paul 1994. The politics of India since independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael and Lambright, Gina. 2001. “Uganda's referendum 2000: The silent boycott,” African Affairs 100: 429–52.CrossRef
Bratton, Michael and Walle, Nicolas. 1997. Democratic experiments in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräutigam, Deborah. 1997. “Institutions, economic reform, and democratic consolidation in Mauritius,” Comparative Politics 30: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Judith. 2003. Nehru: A political life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Marguerite. 1988. Local politics: The law of the fishes: Development through political change in Medak District, Andhra Pradesh (South India). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1996. “Social spending and political support: The ‘lessons’ of the National Solidarity Program in Mexico,” Comparative Politics 26: 151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1997. Taking on Goliath: The emergence of a new left party and the struggle for democracy in Mexico. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, and Tanenbaum, Eric. 2001. Mapping policy preferences. Estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buijtenhuijs, Robert. 1994. “Les partis politiques Africains, ont-ils des projets de société? L'Exemple du Tchad,” Politique Africaine 56.Google Scholar
Bunsha, Dionne. 2002. “The rise of print,” Frontline, July 6–19.Google Scholar
Burgess, Katrina. 1998. “Alliances under stress: Economic reform and party–union relations in Mexico, Spain, and Venezuela,” Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Political Science, Princeton University.
Burgess, Katrina. 2004. Choosing sides: Party–union relations under stress in a globalizing world. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Burgwal, Gerrit. 1993. Caciquismo, paralelismo and clientelismo: The history of a Quito squatter settlement. Amsterdam: Institute of Cultural Anthropology/Sociology of Development, Vrije Universiteit Urban Research Working Papers no. 3.Google Scholar
Burgwal, Gerrit. 1995. “Struggle of the poor. Neighborhood organization and clientelist practice in a Quito Ecuador squatter settlement,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Burnell, Peter. 2001. “The party system and party politics in Zambia: Continuities past, present and future,” African Affairs 100: 239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1976. “Political patronage and party choice among Israeli voters,” Journal of Politics 38: 1023–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderón Alzati, and Cazés, Daniel. 1996. Las elecciones presidenciales de 1994. Mexico City: La Jornada Ediciones.Google Scholar
Callaghy, Thomas. 1984. The state–society struggle: Zaire in comparative perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. and McCargo, Duncan. 1996. “Vote-buying in Thailand's northeast: The July 1995 general election,” Asian Survey 36: 376–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, Alexander. 1976. The city boss in America: An interpretive reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market?” American Journal of Political Science 48: 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, David. 1978. “The expansion of the political economy: A comparative analysis,” American Political Science Review 72: 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantón, Dario. 1986. El pueblo legislador: Las elecciones de 1983. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de América Latina.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2000. “Parchment, equilibria, and institutions,” Comparative Political Studies 33: 735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M. 2005. “Political institutions, competing principals, and party unity in legislative voting,” Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley, working paper #2.
Carey, John M. and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1995. “Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas,” Electoral Studies 14: 414–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlile, Lonny E. and Tilton, Mark C. 1998a. “Regulatory reform and the developmental state,” in Is Japan really changing its ways?, ed. Carlile, Lonny E. and Tilton, Mark C.. Washington, DC: Brookings. 1–15.Google Scholar
Carlile, Lonny E. and Tilton, Mark C. 1998b. “Is Japan really changing?” In Is Japan really changing its ways?, ed. Carlile, Lonny E. and Tilton, Mark C.. Washington, DC: Brookings. 197–218.
Cassese, Sabino. 1994. “Italy: Privatization announced, semi-privatizations and pseudoprivatizations,” in Privatization in Western Europe, ed. Wright, Vincent. London: Pinter. 122–37.
Castells, Manuel and Portes, Alejandro. 1989. “World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy,” in The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries, ed. Portes, Alejandro, Castells, Manuel, and Benton, Lauren A.. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G. (ed.) 1982. The impact of parties: Politics and policies in democratic capitalist states. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Catterberg, Edgardo. 1991. Argentina confronts politics: Political culture and public opinion in the Argentine transition to democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Catterberg, Edgardo and Braun, Maria. 1989. “Las elecciones presidenciales Argentinas del 14 de Mayo de 1989: La ruta a la normalidad,” Desarrollo Económico 115: 361–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabal, Patrick and Daloz, Jean Pierre. 1999. Africa works. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why ethnic parties succeed: Patronage and ethnic headcounts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, Judith. 1981. “The social bases of an urban political machine: The case of Palermo,” Political Science Quarterly 96: 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, Judith. 1982. Patronage, power, and poverty in Southern Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clapham, Christopher. 1982. “Clientelism and the state,” in Private patronage and public power, ed. Clapham. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 1–36.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1982. Regimes in tropical Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1992. The contradictory alliance: State–labor relations and regime change in Mexico. Berkeley: International and Area Studies.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional de Población. 1993. Indicadores socioeconómicos e indice de marginación municipal, 1990.Mexico: CONAPO-CNA.
Cooper, Joseph, Brady, David W., and Hurley, Patricia A. 1977. “The electoral basis of party voting: Patterns and trends in the U.S. House of Representatives,” in The impact of the electoral process, ed. Maisel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1988. “La politica interna de Acción Democrática durante la crisis economica,” Cuadernos del CENDES 7: 159–79.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong parties and lame ducks: Presidential partyarchy and factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1975. Poverty and politics of the migrant poor in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1977. “Leaders, followers, and official patrons in urban Mexico,” in Friends, followers and factions: Readings in political clientelism, ed. Schmidt, Steffen, Scott, James C., and Lande, Carl. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1996. Mexican politics in transition: The breakdown of a one-party dominant regime. San Diego: Center for US-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A., Craig, Ann L., and Fox, Jonathan (eds.) 1994. Transforming state–society relations in Mexico: The national solidarity strategy. Center for US-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Coulon, Christophe. 1988. “Senegal: Development and fragility of a semi democracy,” in Democracy in developing countries: Volume Two, Africa, eds. Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Press. 411–48.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Matthew D. 1993. Legislative leviathan: Party government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Matthew D. 2001. “The institutional determinants of economic policy outcomes,” in Presidents, parliaments, and policy, ed. Haggard, Stephan and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Rosenbluth, Francis M. 1995. “The structural determinants of electoral cohesiveness: England, Japan, and the United States,” in Structure and policy in Japan and the United States, ed. Cowhey, Peter F. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crain, W. Mark, Messenheimer, Harold, and Tollison, Robert D. 1993. “The probability of being president,” Review of Economics and Statistics 75: 683–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, Richard. 1989. “Patrimonialism, administrative effectiveness and economic development in Côte d'Ivoire,” African Affairs 88: 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, Richard. 1997. “Winning coalitions and ethno-regional politics: The failure of the 1990 and 1995 elections in Côte d'Ivoire,” African Affairs 96: 215–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donal, Cruise O'Brien. 1975. Saints and politicians: essays in the organisation of a Senegalese peasant society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald. 1971. Election campaigning Japanese style. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald. 1992. “Japan,” in Electioneering: A comparative study of continuity and change, ed. Butler, David and Ranney, Austin. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
D'Alimente, Roberto and Bartolini, Stefano. 1997. “Electoral transition and party system change in Italy,” West European Politics 20: 110–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Matz and Johansson, Eva. 2002. “On the vote-purchasing behavior of incumbent governments,” American Political Science Review 96: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C., and Beck, Paul Allen. 1984. “Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies,” in Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies: Realignment or dealignment?, ed. Dalton, Russell J., Flanagan, Scott C., and Beck, Paul Allen. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Danevad, Andreas. 1995. “Responsiveness in Botswana politics: Do elections matter?” Journal of Modern African Studies 33: 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Winter, Lieven. 1997. “Intra- and extra-parliamentary role attitudes and behavior of Belgian MPs,” in Members of Parliament in Western Europe, ed. Müller, Wolfgang C. and Saalfeld, Thomas. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
De Winter, Lieven. 1998. “Parliament and government in Belgium: Prisoners of partitocracy,” in Parliaments and governments in Western Europe, ed. Norton, Philip. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
De Winter, Lieven and Dumont, Patrick. 2003. “Belgium: Delegation and accountability under partitocratic rule,” in Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies, ed. Str⊘m, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C., and Bergman, Torbjörn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Lieven, Della Porta, Donatella, and Deschouwer, Kris. 1996. “Comparing similar countries: Belgium and Italy,” Res Publica 38: 215–36.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Vannucci, Alberto. 1995. “Politics, the mafia, and the market for corrupt exchanges,” in Italian politics: Funding the First Republic, ed. Mershon, Carol and Pasquino, Gianfranco. Boulder: Westview Press. 165–85.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Vannucci, A. 1996. “Controlling political corruption in Italy. What did not work, what can be done?” Res Publica 38: 353–69.Google Scholar
Della Sala, Vincent. 1997 “Hollowing out and hardening the state: European integration and the Italian economy,” West European Politics 20: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschouwer, Kris. 1999. “In der Falle gefangen: Belgiens Parteien und ihre Reaktionen auf abnehmende Wählerloyalitäten,” in Parteien auf komplexen Wählermärkten, ed. Mair, Peter, Müller, Wolfang C., and Plasser, Fritz. Vienna: Signum.Google Scholar
Deschouwer, Kris, Dewinter, Lieven, and Della Porta, Donatella. 1996. “Partitocracies between crises and reforms: The cases of Belgium and Italy,” Special issue of Res Publica 38.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1996. “Is the third wave over?” Journal of Democracy 7: 20–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Magaloni, Beatriz and Estévez, Federico. 2003. “Electoral risk and redistributive politics in Mexico and the United States,” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, April 3–6.
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Magaloni, Beatriz, and Weingast, Barry. 2002. “Democratization and the economy in Mexico: Equilibrium (PRI) hegemony and its demise,” Stanford: Stanford University. Typescript.
Dirks, Nicholas B. 2001. Castes of mind: Colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and Londregan, John. 1996. “The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics,” Journal of Politics 58: 1132–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 1991. Neopopulist solutions to neoliberal problems: Mexico's National Solidarity Program. Current Issue Brief No. 3. La Jolla: Center for US–Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Dresser, Denise. 1994. “Bringing the poor back in: National Solidarity as a strategy of regime legitimation,” in Transforming state–society relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy, ed. Cornelius, Wayne A., Craig, Ann. L., and Fox, Jonathan. La Jolla: Center for US–Mexican Relations.Google Scholar
Dreze, Jean and Sen, Amartya. 1995. India: Economic development and social opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dreze, Jean and Sen, Amartya. 1997. Indian development: Selected regional perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drumaux, Anne. 1988. “Privatisation in Belgium: The national and international context,” West European Politics 11: 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William. 2001. The elusive quest for growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Easterly, William and Levine, Ross. 2002. “Tropics, germs, and crops: How endowments influence economic development,” NBER Working Paper No. 9106.Google Scholar
Eboko, Fred. 1999. “Les élites politiques au Cameroun: Le renouvellement sans renouveau?,” in Le non-renouvellement des élites en Afrique Subsaharienne, ed. Jean-Pascal Daloz, . Bordeaux: Centre D'Etude d'Afrique Noire.Google Scholar
Echeverri-Gent, John. 1993. The state and the poor: Public policy and political development in India and the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 1989. “Organized labor's political influence and party ties in Venezuela: Acción Democrática and its labor leadership,” Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs 31: 91–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 1993. Organized labor in Venezuela, 1958–1991: Behavior and concerns in a democratic setting. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 1996. “Political party factionalism and democracy in Venezuela,” Latin American Perspectives 23: 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erie, Steven E. 1988. Rainbow's end: Irish-Americans and the dilemmas of urban machine politics, 1840–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eschenburg, Theodor. 1961. Ämterpatronage. Stuttgart: Curt E. Schwab.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G⊘sta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G⊘sta. 1999. “Politics without class: Postindustrial cleavages in Europe and America,” in Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene and French, Kenneth. 1996. “Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies,” Journal of Finance 51: 55–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, David M. 2002. Electoral systems. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Fauré, Y. and Médard, J. C. (ed.) 1982. Etat et bourgeoisie en Côte d'Ivoire. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent performance and electoral control,” Public Choice 50: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and authority: Towards a theory of political accountability,” in Democracy, accountability, and representation, ed. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan, and Manin, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. “Presidential power, legislative organization, and party behavior in Brazil,” Comparative Politics 32: 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finegold, Kenneth. 1995. Experts and politicians reform: Challenges to machine politics in New York, Cleveland, and Chicago. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1976. “The voting decision: Instrumental and expressive aspects,” Journal of Politics 38: 390–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1994. “The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship,” World Politics 46: 151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard G. 1969. From zamindar to ballot box: Community change in a north Indian market town. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Stephen. 2000. “Bureaucrats for rent: How old-boy networks have undermined the strength of the Japanese state.” Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Department of Political Science.
Frankel, F. and Rao, M. S. A. 1989. Dominance and state power in modern India: decline of a social order, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark. 2004. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Chris and Louca, Francisco. 2001. As time goes by: From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Dieter, Guidorossi, Giovanna, and Svensson, Palle. 1995. “Support for the democratic system,” in Citizens and the state, ed. Hans-Dieter Klingemann, and Fuchs, Dieter. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 323–54.Google Scholar
Fukui, Haruhiro and Fukai, Shigeko N. 1996. “Pork barrel politics, networks, and local economic development in contemporary Japan,” Asian Survey 36: 268–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. “Social capital and the global economy,” Foreign Affairs 74: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fussel, Paul. 1984. Class: A guide through the American status system. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. 1985. “The voters decide?: Preferential voting in European list systems,” European Journal of Political Research 13: 365–78.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan politics in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, Luis Javier. 1982. El partido de la Revolución Institucionalizada 1928–1945. Mexico City: Siglo XⅪ.Google Scholar
Gay, Robert. 1994. Popular organization and democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A tale of two favelas. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1991. “A game theoretical model of reform in Latin American democracies,” American Political Science Review 85: 371–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politicians' dilemma: Building state capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “Comparisons in the context of a game theoretic argument,” in Critical comparisons in politics and culture, ed. Bowen, John R. and Petersen, Roger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara and Neto, Artur Ribeiro. 1992. “Institutional sources of corruption in Brazil,” Third World Quarterly 13: 641–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1997. “The populist road to market reform: Policy and electoral coalitions in Mexico and Argentina,” World Politics 49: 339–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward and Calvo, Ernesto. 2000. “Federalism and low-maintenance constituencies: Territorial dimensions of economic reform in Argentina,” Studies in Comparative International Development 35: 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, Marco. 1997. “Measures of consensual law-making: Italian ‘Consociativismo’,” South European Society & Politics 2: 66–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, Edward L., Porta, Rafael, Lopez-De-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2004. “Do institutions cause growth?” Journal of Economic Growth 9: 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam A. 2002. “Does globalization reduce corruption? Some political consequences of economic integration,” Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29–September 1, 2002, Boston, MA.
Golden, Miriam A. and Chang, Eric C. C. 2001. “Competitive corruption: Factional conflict and political malfeasance in postwar Italian Christian Democracy,” World Politics 53: 588–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golosov, Grigorii V. 1997. “Russian political parties and the ‘bosses’: Evidence from the 1994 provincial elections in Western Siberia,” Party Politics 3: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, Kenneth. 1994. “Corruption and mismanagement in Botswana: A best-case example?,” Journal of Modern African Studies 32: 499–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, Jorge. 2002. “The political and partisan determinants of patronage in Latin America 1969–1994: A comparative analysis,” European Journal of Political Research 41: 513–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosnell, Harold F. 1968 [1937]. Machine politics Chicago model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Government of India, Planning Commission. 2001. Annual Plan 2000–2001. New Delhi, Government of India.
Government of India, Planning Commission. 2002. Economic survey 2001–2002. New Delhi: Economic Division, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
Gray, Mark and Caul, Miki. 2000. “Declining voter turnout in advanced industrial democracies, 1950–1997: The effect of declining group mobilization,” Comparative Political Studies 33: 1091–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Obika . 2004. Demeaned but empowered: The social power of the urban poor in Jamaica. Kingston: University of the West Indies Press.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner . 2006. Historical institutional analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guillermoprieto, Alma. 2002. “Letter from Colombia: Waiting for war,” The New Yorker, May 13, 48–55.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 1990. Pathways from the periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert (ed.) 1992. The politics of adjustment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2003. “Explaining machine politics in Russia's regions: Economy, ethnicity, and legacy,” Post-Soviet Affairs 19: 228–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Henry E. 2005. “The makeup and breakup of ethnofederal States: Why Russia survives where the USSR fell,” Perspectives on Politics 3: 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David. 2001. “An introduction to varieties of capitalism,” in Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, ed. Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1995. One for all: The logic of group conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harmel, Robert and Janda, Kenneth. 1982. Parties and their environment. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael. 1987. Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hellemans, Staf. 1990. Strijd om de moderniteit. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
Hernández, Alfonso. 2001. “The political economy of the governorship,” unpublished paper, ITESO, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Hernández Rodríguez, Rogelio. 1991. “La reforma interna y los conflictos en el PRI,” Foro Internacional 31: 222–49.Google Scholar
Herring, Ronald J. 1983. Land to the tiller: The political economy of agrarian reform in South Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibou, Béatrice (ed.) 1999. La Privatisation des états. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Hierczy de Miño, Wolfgang and Lane, John C. 2000. “Malta: STV in a two-party system,” in Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the single transferable vote, ed. Bowler, Shaun and Grofman, Bernard. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, David. 1979. “Italy,” in Government and administration in Western Europe, ed. Ridley, R. F.. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hine, David. 1993. Governing Italy: The politics of bargained pluralism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hirschleifer, Jack and Riley, John. 1992. The analytics of uncertainty and information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiskey, Jonathan. 1999. “Does democracy matter? Electoral competition and local development in Mexico,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Hodgkin, Thomas. 1961. African political parties. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hopkin, Jonathan and Mastropaolo, Alfio. 2001. “From patronage to clientelism: Comparing the Italian and Spanish experiences,” in Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation, ed. Piattoni, Simona. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku. 2001. “Turnout twist: Higher voter turnout in lower-level elections”. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Horowitz, Donald. 1985. Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Howell, Chris and Daley, Anthony. 1992. “The transformation of political exchange,” International Journal of Political Economy 22: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D. 2001. Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. “Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies,” Party Politics 1: 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. and Shipan, Charles R. 2002. Deliberate discretion? Institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy in modern democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1993. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The silent revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inkles, Alex and Smith, David H. 1974. Becoming modern: Individual change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 2001. “India, recent economic development and selected issues,” June 5: 87–88.
Jackman, Robert. 1987. “Political institutions and voter turnout in the industrial democracies,” American Political Science Review 81: 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Daniel. 1988. Resistance and integration: Peronism and the Argentine working class, 1946–1976. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jerusalem Post. 2001. “Hillary and the Hassidim,” March 16.
Johnston, Michael. 1979. “Patrons and clients, jobs and machines: A case study of the uses of patronage,” American Political Science Review 73: 385–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jomo, K. S. and Gomez, E. T. 1999. Malaysia's political economy: Politics, patronage and profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, Richard. 1987. Democracy and prebendal politics in Nigeria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2002. Crony capitalism: Corruption and development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karanth, G. K. 1997. “Caste in contemporary rural India,” in Caste: Its twentieth century avatar, ed. Srinivas, M. N.. New Delhi: Penguin Books. 87–109.Google Scholar
Kasfir, Nelson. 1971. The shrinking political arena: Participation and ethnicity in African politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaspin, Deborah. 1995. “The politics of ethnicity in Malawi's democratic transition,” Journal of Modern African Studies 33: 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1980. A theory of parties and electoral systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1990. “Party as linkage: A vestigial function?” European Journal of Political Research 18: 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995 “Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party,” Party Politics 1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 1985. Small states in world markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Zoido-Lobaton, Pablo. 2002. Governance matters II. Updated indicators for 2000/01. The World Bank. Development Research Group. Policy Research Working Paper 2772.Google Scholar
Kearney, Robert. 1973. The politics of Ceylon (Sri Lanka). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keefer, Phil. 2003. “Clientelism, development and democracy,” Washington, DC: World Bank. Typescript.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D. 1991. The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriations process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1998. Unifying political methodology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Murray, Christopher J.Salomon, L., , Joshua A., and Tandon, Ajay. 2003. “Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research,” American Political Science Review 98: 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “The transformation of western European party systems,” in Political parties and political development, ed. LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The radical right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000a. “Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities,” Comparative Political Studies 33: 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000b. “Citizens, politicians, and party cartellization: Political representation and state failure in post-industrial democracies,” European Journal of Political Research 37: 149–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. Forthcoming. “Party systems,” in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Smyth, Regina. 2002. “Programmatic party cohesion in emerging post-communist democracies: Russia in comparative context,” Comparative Political Studies 35: 1228–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Kirk, Hawkins, Guillermo, Rosas, and Zechmeister, Liz. 2006. “Party competition in Latin America,” unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Toka, Gabor. 1999. Post-communist party systems: Competition, representation, and inter-party cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 1994. “Realignment or dealignment? Consequences of economic crisis and restructuring for the Mexican party system,” in Politics of economic restructuring: State–society relations and regime change in Mexico, eds. Cook, Maria Lorena, Middlebrook, Kevin, and Molinar, Juan. La Jolla: Center for US–Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 1996. “¿Realineación o desalineación? Consecuencias de la crisis y la reestructuración economica para el sistema partidiario Mexicano,” in Las dimensiones politicas de reestructuración Mexicana, ed. Cook, Maria Lorena, Middlebrook, Kevin and Molinar, Juan. México: Cal y Arena. 251–91.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Hofferbert, Richard, and Budge, Ian. 1994. Parties, policies, and democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 2003. (ed.) Democracy, governance and growth. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, Stanley A. 1987. “Briefcase politics in India: The Congress Party and the business elite,” Asian Survey 27:1278–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koelble, Thomas. 1991. The left unraveled: Social democracy and the new left challenge. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Koelble, Thomas. 1992. “Recasting social democracy in Europe: A nested games explanation of strategic adjustment in political parties,” Politics and Society 20: 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kofler, Anton. 1985. Parteiengesellschaft im Umbruch: Partizipationsprobleme von Grossparteien. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1987. The state and poverty in India: The politics of reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1990. Democracy and discontent: India's growing crisis of governability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koole, Ruud. 1996. “Cadre, catch-all or cartel? A comment on the notion of the cartel party,” Party Politics 2: 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothari, Rajni. 1988. State against democracy: In search of humane governance. Delhi: Ajanta Publishers.
Kothari, Rajni. 1998. “Rise of the Dalits and the renewed debate on caste,” in State and politics in India, ed. Chatterjee, Partha. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 439–58.
Krishna, Anirudh. 2002a. Active social capital: Tracing the roots of democracy and development. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh. 2002b. “Enhancing political participation in democracies: What is the role of social capital?” Comparative Political Studies 35: 437–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi. 2001. “Clientelism in a cold climate: The case of Iceland,” in Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation, ed. Piattoni, Simona. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Berthold. 1998. Participatory development in rural India. New Delhi: Radiant Publishers.Google Scholar
Kumar Singh, Ajit. 2000. “UP budget 2000–2001: Fiscal crisis deepens,” Economic and Political Weekly (Mumbai) April 29, 1512–13.Google Scholar
Kurer, Oskar. 1996. “The political foundations of economic development policies,” Journal of Development Studies 32: 645–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtzman, David Harold. 1935. “Methods of controlling votes in Philadelphia,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Laakso, Markku and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective number of parties: A measure with application to west Europe,” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, Dimitri and Kapstein, Ethan. 2001. “Inequality, growth, and democracy,” World Politics 53: 264–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Jan-Erik. 2000. New public management. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lane, Jan-Erik and Ersson, Svante. 1999. The new institutional politics: Performance and outcomes. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. 1999. “The quality of government,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15: 222–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael and Hunt, Ben. 1992. Party and policy competition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawson, Kay (ed.) 1980. Political parties and linkage. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leal, Victor Nunes. 1977. Coronelismo: The municipality and representative government in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemarchand, René . 1972. “Political clientilism and ethnicity in tropical Africa: Competing solidarities in nation building,” American Political Science Review 66: 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemarchand, René. 1988. “The state, the parallel economy and the changing structure of patronage systems,” in The precarious balance: State and society in Africa, ed. Rothchild, Donald and Chazan, Naomi. Boulder: Westview Press. 149–70.Google Scholar
Lemarchand, René , and Legg, Keith. 1972. “Political clientelism and development: A preliminary analysis,” Comparative Politics 4: 149–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, Roberto and Wertman, David A. 1989. Italian Christian Democracy. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. “The grocer and the chief: A parable,” in The passing of traditional society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of rule and revenue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 1999. “From laborism to liberalism: Institutionalization and labor-based party adaptation in Argentina 1983–1997,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
Levitsky, Steven. 2001. “A ‘disorganized organization’: Informal organization and the persistence of local party structures in Argentine Peronism,” Journal of Latin American Studies 33: 29–65.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven 2003. Transforming labor-based parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Peter. 1996. “From prebendalism to predation: The political economy of decline in Nigeria,” Journal of Modern African Studies 34: 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur. 1978. The evolution of the international economic order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lienert, Ian and Modi, Jitendra. 1997. “A decade of civil service reform in sub-Saharan Africa,” IMF Working Paper WP/97/179. International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department.
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in plural societies: A comparative explanation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Limongi, Fernando, and Cheibub Figueredo, Argelina. 1995. “Partidos politicos na Câmara dos Deputados: 1989–1994,” Dados 38: 497–525.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar, and Weibull, Jörgen. 1987. “Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition,” Public Choice 52: 273–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, C. Staffan. 2001. “Our time to chop: Elections 2000 in Ghana,” Presentation to the Annual Meetings of the African Studies Association, Houston, Texas, 15–18 November.
Linstone, Harold A. and Turoff, Murray. 1975. The delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1994. “Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference?,” 3–87, in The failure of presidential democracy, ed. Valenzuela, Arturo and Linz, Juan. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1994. “The social requisites of democracy revisited,” American Sociological Review 59:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavages, structures, and voters alignments: An introduction,” in Party systems and voter alignments, ed. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1998. “Federalism and central bank independence: The politics of German monetary policy, 1957–1992,” World Politics 50: 401–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. At the pleasure of the mayor: Patronage and power in New York City 1898–1959. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Lyne, Mona M. 2004. “Endogenous institutions: Electoral law and internal party dynamics in Brazil,” Paper presented at the 2004 American Political Science Association Annual Convention, Chicago.
Lyne, Mona M. 2006. “The voter's dilemma and democratic accountability in Brazil and Venezuela: A transaction cost theory of electoral sanctioning.” Manuscript.
MacMullen, A. L. 1979. “Belgium,” in Government and administration in Western Europe, ed. Ridley, R. F.. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2005. “The demise of Mexico's one-party dominant regime: Elite choices and the masses in the establishment of democracy,” in The third wave of democratization in Latin America: Advances and setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. Forthcoming. Voting for autocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1992. “Brazilian party underdevelopment in comparative perspective,” Political Science Quarterly 107: 677–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1995. “Brazil: Weak parties, feckless democracy,” in Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Perez-Liñán, Anibal. 1997. “Party discipline in multiparty systems: A methodological note and an analysis of the Brazilian Constitutional Congress,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 471–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manor, James. 1997. “Karnataka: Caste, class, dominance and politics in a cohesive society,” in State and politics in India, ed. Chafferjee, P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 262–73.Google Scholar
Manor, James. 2000. “Small-time political fixers in India's states,” Asian Survey 40: 816–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manow, Philip. 2002. “Was erklärt politische Patronage in den Ländern Westeuropas? Defizite des politischen Wettbewerbs oder historisch-formative Phasen der Massendemokratisierung,” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 43: 20–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Michael. 2000. “Candidate centered but party wrapped: Campaigning in Ireland under STV,” in Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the single transferable vote, ed. Bowler, Shaun and Grofman, Bernhard. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Michael and Mitchell, Paul. 1999. “Office, votes, and then policy: Choices for political parties in the Republic of Ireland, 1981–1992,” in Policy, office, or votes?, ed. Müller, Wolfgang C. and Str⊘m, Kaare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martz, John D. 1966. Acción Democrática: Evolution of a modern political party in Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, Ingvar and Str⊘m, Kaare. 1995. “Parliamentary committees,” in Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe, ed. Döring, Herbert. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Mavrogordatos, George T. 1997. “From traditional clientelism to machine politics: The impact of PASOK populism in Greece,” South European Society & Politics 2: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Adrian. 1997. “Caste in an Indian village: Change and continuity 1954–1992,” in Caste today, ed. Fuller, C. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 32–64.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Mary Alice. 1997. “Center-left parties in Chile: Party–labor relations under a minimalist state,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 10–12.
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Rosenbluth, Frances. 1995. “Party provision for personal politics: Dividing the vote in Japan,” in Structure and policy in Japan and the United States, ed. Cowhey, Peter F. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, James W. 1997. Peronism without Peron: Unions, parties, and democracy in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Medina, Luis Fernando, and Stokes, Susan C. 2002. “Clientelism as political monopoly,” Unpublished manuscript, Political Science Department, University of Chicago.
Middlebrook, Kevin. 1995. The paradox of revolution. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Strong societies and weak states. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mijeski, Kenneth. 1977. “Costa Rica: The shrinking of the presidency?,” in Presidential power in Latin American politics, ed. Di Bacco, Thomas V.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Milne, R. S. 1973. “Patrons, clients and ethnicity: The case of Sarawak and Sabah in Malaysia,” Asian Survey 13: 891–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Paul. 2000. “Voters and their representatives: Electoral institutions and delegation in Parliamentary Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research 37: 335–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, Subrata K. 1991. “Room to maneuver in the middle: Local elites, political action, and the state in India,” World Politics 43: 390–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, Subrata K. 1992. Power, protest and participation: Local elites and the politics of development in India. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan. 1991. El tiempo de la legitimidad: Elecciones, autoritarismo y democracia en Mexico. Mexico City: Cal y Arena.Google Scholar
Molinar Horcasitas, Juan and Weldon, Jeffrey A. 1994. “Electoral determinants and consequences of National Solidarity,” in Transforming state–society relations in Mexico: The National solidarity strategy, ed. Cornelius, Wayne A., Craig, Ann. L., and Fox, Jonathan. La Jolla: Center for US–Mexican Relations.Google Scholar
Moller, Stefanie, Bradley, David, Huber, Evelyne, Nielson, François, and Stephens, John D. 2003. “Determinants of relative poverty in advanced capitalist democracies,” American Sociological Review 68: 22–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora y Araujo, Manuel and Llorente, Ignacio (eds). 1980. El voto Peronista: Ensayos de sociologia electoral argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of legislative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Ruth Schachter. 1964. Political parties in West Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo. 1998. Democracy between consolidation and crisis: Parties, groups, and citizens in southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Stephen D. 1995. Political reformism in Mexico: An overview of contemporary Mexican politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Morris-Jones, W. H. 1967. The government and politics of India. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Aurelia George. 2000. The politics of agriculture in Japan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. 1983. “Direktwahl und Parteiensystem,” Österreichisches Jahrbuch für Politik: 83–112.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. 1988. “Privatising in a corporatist economy: The politics of privatisation in Austria,” West European Politics 11: 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. 1989. “Party patronage in Austria,” in The Austrian party system, ed. Pelinka, Anton and Plasser, Fritz. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. 2000. “Patronage by national governments,” in The nature of party government, ed. Blondel, Jean and Cotta, Maurizio. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. 2006. “The changing role of the Austrian civil service: The impact of politicisation, public sector reform, and Europeanisation,” in From the service state to the enabling state, ed. Page, Edward C.. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Meth-Cohn, Delia. 1994. “Looking reality in the eye: The politics of privatization in Austria,” in Privatization in Austria, ed. Wright, Vincent. New York: Pinter Publishers. 160–79.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C., Jenny, Marcelo, Steininger, Barbara, Dolezal, Martin, Philipp, Wilfried, and Preisl-Westphal, Sabine. 2001. Die österreichischen Abgeordneten. Vienna: WUV-Fakultas.Google Scholar
Murillo, María Victoria. 2001. Partisan coalitions and labor competition in Latin America: Trade unions and market reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narain, Iqbal (ed.) 1976. State politics in India. Meerut: Meenakshi Prakashan.Google Scholar
Nayak, Radhika, Saxena, N. C. and Farrington, , John. 2002. Reaching the poor: The influence of policy and administrative processes on the implementation of government poverty schemes in India. ODI Working Paper 175, September.
Newell, James L., and Bull, Martin. 1997. “Party organization and alliances in Italy in the 1990s: A revolution of sorts,” West European Politics 20: 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nian, Senati. 2002. “Rural revolution,” The Hindu, June 23.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, Paul. 2001. “Winners, losers and also-rans: Money, moral authority, and voting patterns in the Ghana 2000 elections,” African Affairs 100: 405–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1979. “Tensions in the bureaucratic authoritarian state and the question of democracy,” in The new authoritarianism in Latin America, ed. Collier, David. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Gorman, Frank. 1984. “Electoral deference in ‘unreformed’ England: 1760–1832,” Journal of Modern History 56: 391–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuda, Takako. 2001. “Mechanism and dynamics of Japanese clientelism: Examination of politics of pork barrel politics in the 1990s,” Unpublished Master's thesis, Duke University.
Olson, Mancur Jr. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orttung, Robert W. 2002. “Business and politics in Russia's regions,” paper prepared for the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, Pittsburgh, PA.
Overseas Development Institute. 2002. “Panchayati Raj and natural resources management: How to decentralize management over natural resources. Karnataka: Situation analysis and literature review,” Working Document: 22–23.
Pacheco Mendez, Guadalupe. 1991. “Los sectores del PRI en las elecciones de 1988,” Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 7: 253–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Edward C. and Wright, Vincent (eds.) 1999. Bureaucratic elites in western European states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palomino, Hector. 1987. Cambios ocupacionales y sociales en Argentina, 1947–1985. Buenos Aires: CISEA.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panini, M. N. 1997. “The political economy of caste,” in Caste: Its twentieth century avatar, ed. Srinivas, M. N.. New Delhi: Penguin Books. 28–68.Google Scholar
Papakostas, Apostolis. 2001. “Why is there no clientelism in Scandinavia? A comparison of the Swedish and Greek sequences of development,” in Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation, ed. Piattoni, Simona. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, Takis S. 1999. Making party democracy in Greece. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Park, Chan Wook. 1998. “Legislators and their constituents in South Korea: The pattern of district representation,” Asian Survey 28: 1049–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Cheol Hee. 1998. “Electoral strategies in urban Japan: How institutional change affects strategic choices,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
Pempel, T. J. 1978. “Political parties and social change: The Japanese experience,” in Political parties: Development and decay, ed. Maisel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, Francesco. 2001. “Electoral rules and corruption,” NBER Working Paper8154.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy and Pierre, Jon (eds.) 2001. Politicians, bureaucrats, and administrative reform. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piattoni, Simona (ed.) 2001. Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumb, David. 1998. “El partido por la democracia: The birth of Chile's postmaterialist catch-all Left,” Party Politics 4: 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1975. “Legislatures,” in Handbook of political science. Volume 5. Governmental institutions and processes, ed. Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W.. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E., Takeuchi, Hirotaka, and Sakakibara, Mariko. 2000. Can Japan compete?Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
Posner, Daniel. N. 1998. “The institutional origins of ethnic politics in Zambia,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Government, Harvard University.
Post, Kenneth. 1963. The Nigerian federal election of 1959. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 1986. “American voter turnout in comparative perspective,” American Political Science Review 80: 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political representation in comparative politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, John Duncan. 1970. “Peasant society and clientelist politics,” American Political Science Review 64: 411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper stones: A history of electoral socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Dennis and Woolley, John T. 2001. “Democracy and national economic performance: The preference for stability,” American Journal of Political Science 45: 634–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftopoulos, Brian. 2001. “Le mouvement syndical et émergence de l'opposition politique au Zimbabwe,” Politique Africaine81.
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances M. 1995. The politics of oligarchy: Institutional choice in imperial Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances M. 1993. Japan's political marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reddaway, P. and Orttung, R. W. 2004. Dynamics of Russian politics: Putin's reform of federal-regional relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. Ram and Haragopal, G. 1985. “The Pyraveerkar: The ‘fixer’ in rural India,” Asian Survey 25: 1147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1986. Japanese prefectures and policymaking. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2000. “Silence of the land: An historical and normative analysis of territorial representation in the United States,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Chicago.
Reno, William. 1995. Corruption and state politics in Sierra Leone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Martin. 1997. “Financing party politics in Italy: A case of systemic corruption,” West European Politics 20: 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Bradley. 1997. Japanese democracy: Power, coordination, and performance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1980. “Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions,” American Political Science Review 74: 432–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordon, William. 1994. Plunkitt of Tammany Hall. Boston: Bedford Books.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1994. “Renovation in the revolution? Dictatorship, democracy, and political change in the Chilean left,” Kellogg Institute Working Paper 203. Notre Dame: The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies.
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1995. “Neoliberalism and the transformation of populism in Latin America: The Peruvian case,” World Politics 48: 82–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1998a. Deepening democracy? The modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M 1998b. “The Chilean party system and social cleavages in the neoliberal era,” Paper prepared for delivery at the XⅪ International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, 24–26 September, 1998.
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. “Social inequalities without class inequalities in Latin America's neoliberal era,” Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. and Arce, Moises. 1998. “Neoliberalism and lower-class voting behavior in Peru,” Comparative Political Studies 31: 217–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M., and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. “Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations,” American Political Science Review 93: 575–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A. and Verdier, Thierry. 2001. “The political economy of clientelism,” Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Robinson, Marguerite S. 1988. Local politics: The law of fishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan and Wibbels, Erik. 2002. “Beyond the fiction of federalism,” World Politics 54: 491–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani, Subramanian, Arvind and Trebbi, Francesco. 2002. “Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development,” Revised paper, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. “Trade and the variety of democratic institutions,” InternationalOrganization 41: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roniger, Luis. 1981. “Clientelism and patron-client relations: A bibliography,” in Political clientelism, patronage and development, ed. Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. and Lemarchand, Rene. Beverly Hills: Sage. 297–329.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances M. 1996. “Internationalization and electoral politics in Japan,” in Internationalization and domestic politics, ed. Keohane, Robert O. and Milner, Helen V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothchild, Donald. 1985. “State ethnic relations in middle Africa,” in African independence: the first 25 years, ed. Carter, Gwendolyn and O'Meara, Patrick. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rothchild, Donald and Olorunsola, V. A. (eds.) 1982. State versus ethnic claims: African policy dilemmas. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Roy, A. D. 1952. “Safety first and the holding of assets,” Econometrica 20: 431–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Aruna and Dey, Nikhil. 2001. “Chasing a right,” Frontline 18, 7 (March 31–April 13).
Rudolph, L. I. and Rudolph, S. H. 1967. The modernity of tradition: Political development in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, David J. 2002. “Pork barreling is not credit claiming or advertising: Campaign finance and the sources of the personal vote in Brazil,” Journal of Politics 64: 845–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David and Snyder, Richard. 2001. “The value of a vote: Malapportionment in comparative perspective,” British Journal of Political Science 31: 651–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandbrook, Richard. 1972. “Patrons, clients and factions: New dimensions of conflict analysis in Africa,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 5: 104–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Saxena. S. B. and Charan, A. S. 1973. “Dingri (Udaipur District, Rajasthan): A village in the vicinity of a new rail link.” Indian Village Studies No. 18, Agro-Economic Research Center. Vallabh Vidyanagar Gujarat: Sadar Patel University.Google Scholar
Scalapino, Robert A. 1953. Democracy and the party movement in prewar Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schady, Norbert. 2000. “The political economy of expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund FONCODES, 1991–95,” American Political Science Review 94: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Frederic. 1998. Democracy in translation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Games real actors play. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. and Schmidt, Vivien A. 2000. Welfare and work in the open economy: From vulnerability to competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzberg, Michael. 2001. Political legitimacy in Middle Africa: Father, family, food.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 2001. “The limits of anti-clientelist appeals: Opposition failure in Japan,” Paper prepared for delivery at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 30–September 2.
Scheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy without competition in Japan: Opposition failure in a one-party dominant state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1969. “Corruption, machine politics, and political change,” American Political Science Review 62: 1142–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1972. “Patron–client politics and political change in Southeast Asia,” American Political Science Review 66: 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, Timothy R. 1995. “Reconstituting party politics in Chile,” in Building democratic institutions. Party systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R.. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 100–37.Google Scholar
Seaman, Scott R. 2003. “Crumbling foundations: Japan's public works policies and democracy in the 1990s,” unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Duke University.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. 1964. “Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk,” Journal of Finance 19: 425–42.Google Scholar
Sheffer, Gabriel. 1978. “Elite cartel, vertical domination, and grassroots discontent in Israel,” in Territorial politics in industrial nations, ed. Sidney Tarrow, Peter J. Katzenstein, Luigi Graziano. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Shefter, Martin 1977. “Party and patronage: Germany, England, and Italy,” Politics and Society 7: 403–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, Martin 1994. Political parties and the state: The American historical experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1986. “Institutional equilibrium and equilibrium institutions,” in Political science. The science of politics, ed. Weisberg, Herbert F.. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. “Studying institutions: Some lessons from the rational choice approach,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 1: 131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. and Bonchek, M. S. 1997. Analyzing politics: Rationality, behavior, and institutions. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R. 1987. “The institutional foundation of committee power,” American Political Science Review 81: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheth, D. L. 1999. “Secularisation of caste and making of new middle class,” Economic and Political Weekly, August 21–28, 2502–10.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1998. “The inverse relationship between party strength and executive strength: A theory of politicians' constitutional choices,” British Journal of Political Science 28: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Carey, John M. 1992. Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Rajendra. 1988. Land, power and people: Rural elite in transition 1801–1970. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Singh, Vikas, Gehlot, Bhupendra, Start, Daniel and Johnson, Craig. 2003. “Out of reach: Local politics and the disbursement of development funds in Madhya Pradesh,” Overseas Development Institute Working Paper May 2003 (www.odi.org.uk/publications/working_papers/WP200.pdf).
Sisson, Richard. 1972. The Congress Party in Rajasthan: Political integration and institution-building in an Indian state. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smith, William. 1989. Authoritarianism and the crisis of the Argentine political economy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Somjee, A. H. 1959. Voting behaviour in an Indian village. Political Science Series no. 2. Baroda: M.S. University of Baroda, 1959.Google Scholar
Soskice, David. 1999. “Divergent production regimes: Coordinated and uncoordinated market economies in the 1980s and 1990s,” in Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 101–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiefel, Dieter. 2000. “Fifty years of state-owned industry in Austria, 1946–1996,” in The rise and fall of state-owned enterprise in the western world, ed. Toninelli, Pier Angelo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1972. “Economic competition and political competition,” Public Choice 13: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1995. Cultures in conflict: Social movements and the state in Peru. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2003. “Perverse accountability: Monitoring voters and buying votes,” Paper prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 28–31.
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina,” American Political Science Review 99: 315–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Carl. 1986. Class, state, and democracy in Jamaica. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. 1999. “Central weakness and provincial autonomy,” Post-Soviet Affairs 15: 87–104.Google Scholar
Str⊘m, Kaare. 1990. “A behavioral theory of competitive political parties,” American Journal of Political Science 34: 565–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Str⊘m, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C., and Bergman, Torbjörn (eds.) 2003. Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subha, K. 1997. Karnataka Panchayat elections 1995: Process, issues and membership profile. New Delhi: Concept Publishing/Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Swenden, Wilfried. 2002. “Asymmetric federalism and coalition-making in Belgium,” Publius 32: 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szwarcberg, Mariela L. 2001. “Feeding loyalties: An analysis of clientelism, the case of the Manzaneras,” unpublished manuscript, Universidad Torcuato di Tella.
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1977. Between center and periphery: Grassroots politicians in Italy and France. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tatebayashi, Masahiko, and McKean, Margaret. 2001. “Vote division and policy differentiation strategies of LDP members under SNTV/MMD in Japan,” Prepared for the Conference on Citizen-Elite Linkages, March 30–April 1 2001, Duke University.
Throup, David W., and Hornsby, Charles. 1998. Multi-party politics in Kenya: The Kenyatta & Moi states & the triumph of the system in the 1992 Election. Oxford: J. Currey.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1975. The formation of nation states in western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Torre, Juan Carlos. 1983. Los sindicalistas en el gobierno, 1973–1976. Buenos Aires: Centro Editor de America Latina.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The causes of corruption: A cross-national study,” Journal of Public Economics 76: 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Daniel S. 1999. After the deluge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested games: Rational choice in comparative politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto players: An introduction to institutional analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uphoff, Norman and Ilchman, Warren. 1972. The political economy of development: Theoretical and empirical contributions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Uriu, Robert M. 1996. Troubled industries: Confronting economic change in Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Urquizo, Yolanda. 1999. Unpublished manuscript, Universidad Nacional de Misiones.
van de Walle, Nicolas. 1993. “The politics of non-reform in Cameroon,” in Hemmed in: Responses to Africa's economic decline, ed. Callaghy, Thomas and Ravenhill, John. New York: Columbia University Press. 357–97.Google Scholar
van de Walle, Nicolas. 1993. “The politics of non-reform in Cameroon,” in Hemmed in: Responses to Africa's economic decline, ed. Callaghy, Thomas and Ravenhill, John. New York: 2001. African economies and the politics of permanent crisis, 1979–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hassel, Hugo. 1975. “Belgian civil servants and political decision making,” in The mandarins of western Europe, ed. Dogan, Mattei. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Outrive, Lode. 1996. “The political role of the judiciary,” Res Publica 38: 371–84.Google Scholar
Villalón, Leonardo. 1994. “Democratizing a quasi democracy: The Senegalese elections of 1993,” African Affairs 93: 163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villarreal, Juan. 1987. “Changes in Argentine society: The heritage of the dictatorship,” in From military rule to liberal democracy in Argentina, ed. Peralta-Ramos, Monica and Waisman, Carlos. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Waisbord, Silvio. 1995. El gran desfile: Campañas electorales y medios de comunicación en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin,” World Politics 55: 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Carolyn M. 1997. “Political parties and the opportunity costs of patronage,” Party Politics 3: 533–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Carolyn M. 2001. “Mass parties and clientelism in France and Italy,” in Clientelism, interests and democratic representation, ed. Piattoni, Simona. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 122–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washbrook, David. 1973. “Country politics: Madras 1880 to 1930,” Modern Asian Studies 7: 475–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Eugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1967. Party building in a new nation: The Indian National Congress. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1986. “The political economy of industrial growth in India,” World Politics 38: 596–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1995. “The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 1–31.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1996. “Political institutions: Rational choice perspectives,” in A new handbook of political science, ed. Goodin, Robert E. and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 2000. “A comparative theory of federal economic performance,” APSA-CP Newsletter, Winter, 6–11.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. and Marshall, William J. 1988. “The industrial organization of Congress: Or why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets,” Journal of Political Economy 96:132–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingrod, Alex. 1968. “Patrons, patronage and political parties,” in Comparative Studies in Society and History 10: 377–400. Also published in Friends, followers and factions; A reader in political clientelism, ed. Schmidt, Steffen W., Guasti, Laura, Landé, Carl H. and Scott, James C.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “Political sources of presidencialismo in Mexico,” in Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, J. H. 1965. “Landlord influence at elections in Ireland, 1760–1885,” English Historical Review 80: 740–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiberg, Matti. 1995. “Parliamentary questions,” in Parliaments and majority rule in western Europe, ed. Döring, Herbert. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Widner, Jennifer. 1992. The rise of the party-state in Kenya. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wildgen, John K. 1985. “Preference voting and intraparty competition in Italy: Some new evidence on the Communist–Christian Democratic stalemate,” Journal of Politics 47: 947–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Steven I. 2004. Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E. 1972. “Why political machines have not withered away and other revisionist thoughts,” Journal of Politics 34: 365–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodall, Brian. 1996. Japan under construction: Corruption, politics, and public works. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1999. World development report 1999/2000. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2000a. Entering the 21st century. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank 2000b. Overview of rural decentralization in India, Volume II,” Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank 2003. India: Sustaining reform, reducing poverty. Report No. 25797-IN. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yadav, Yogendra. 1996. “Reconfiguration in Indian politics: State assembly elections, 1993–95,” Economic and Political Weekly95–104.Google Scholar
Zamítiz, Héctor. 1991. “La reforma del PRI en el contexto de la reforma del estado: Actores y dinámica política de la ⅪV Asamblea Nacional,” Estudios Políticos 6: 109–39.Google Scholar
Zucker, Lynne G. 1977. “The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence,” American Sociological Review 42: 726–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan. 1979. The politics of faction. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar