Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-jzjqj Total loading time: 0.49 Render date: 2022-08-19T23:04:13.520Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

10 - Why the Classic-Keynesian Trend May Be of Interest to a Young Scholar Today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

Enrico Bellino
Affiliation:
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano
Sebastiano Nerozzi
Affiliation:
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano
Get access

Summary

Many of the great masters of post-Keynesian economics – think of Lunghini, Garegnani, Graziani, but the list is long – are no longer with us. Those belonging to the following generation have been marginalised and reduced to irrelevance, at least in the academic arena. The ‘neoclassical group’, on the other hand, has closed its ranks and built a powerful machine of cultural hegemony. It is very difficult for those who pursue non ‘mainstream’ lines of research to build an academic career – and thus continue to do research. And still, if paradigm shifts are most likely to happen in the wake of epochal transformations, the world is changing rapidly enough to advocate for one.

The building-blocks of this ‘new’ paradigm are all there. All we have to do is to circumscribe its perimeter, and close ourselves our ranks to join forces and knowledge and provide a complete, coherent and alternative interpretative framework to the dominant one. In this chapter, I make the bold attempt to connect these blocks, giving a (non-comprehensive) list of readings, authors or research lines which could fruitfully cooperate in creating the school of thought Pasinetti is advocating for.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pasinetti and the Classical Keynesians
Nine Methodological Issues
, pp. 259 - 289
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellofiore, R. (2019) ‘C’è vita su Marx? Il Capitale nel bicentenario’, in Bellofiore, R. and Fabiani, C. (eds.) Marx Inattuale, Roma, Edizioni Efesto, pp. 968.Google Scholar
Bellofiore, R. Garibaldo, F. and Mortagua, M. (2015) ‘A Credit-Money and Structural Perspective on the European Crisis: Why Exiting the Euro Is the Answer to the Wrong Question’, in Review of Keynesian Economics, 3(4), pp. 471490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellofiore, R. and Halevi, J. (2012) ‘Deconstructing Labour: A Marxian-Kaleckian Perspective of What Is “New” in Contemporary Capitalism’, in Gnos, C. Rochon, L. and Tropeano, D. (eds.) Employment, Growth and Development: A Post-Keynesian Approach, Cheltenham, Elgar, pp. 1127.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Leigh, D. (2013) ‘Growth Forecast Errors and Fiscal Multipliers’, IMF Working Paper WP/13/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dina, A. (1982) ‘Tecnologia e lavoro. Richiami storici e problemi attuali’, in Classe, 22, pp. 537.Google Scholar
Gaddi, M. (2020). ‘Technological and Organisational Innovation under Industry 4.0 – Impact on Working Conditions in the Italian Automotive Supply Sector’, in Drahokoupil, J. (ed.) The Challenge of Digital Transformation in the Automotive Industry: Jobs, Upgrading and the Prospects for Development, Brussels, ETUI, pp. 127152.Google Scholar
Gaddi, M. Garbellini, N. Garibaldo, F. (2018) (eds.) Industry 4.0 and Its Consequences for Work and Labour, Bologna and Milan, Fondazione Sabbattini.Google Scholar
Gilibert, G. (1977) Quesnay – La costruzione della ‘macchina della prosperità’. Milan, Etas Libri.Google Scholar
Gilibert, G. (1991) ‘La scuola russo-tedesca di economia matematica e la dottrina del flusso circolare’ in Becattini, G. (ed.) Il pensiero economico: Temi, problemi e scuole, Torino, UTET, pp. 387403.Google Scholar
Godley, W. Lavoie, M. (2007) Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth, London and New York Palgrgave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziani, A. (2003) The Monetary Theory of Production, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halevi, J. (2016) ‘Luigi Pasinetti and the Political Economy of Growth and Distribution’, INET Working paper 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMF (2010) World Economic Outlook: Rebalancing Growth. Washington, DC, IMF.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. (1928 [1991]) ‘The Economy as a Circular Flow’, in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2(1), pp. 181212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, W. Duchin, F. (1986) The Future Impact of Automation on Workers, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1880) A Workers’ Inquiry, La Revue socialiste. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/04/20.htm.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1992) Capital: Vol. I, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Momigliano, F. Siniscalco, D. (1986) ‘Mutamenti nella struttura del sistema produttivo e integrazione fra industria e settore terziario’, in Pasinetti, L. L. (ed.) Mutamenti strutturali del sistema produttivo. Integrazione tra industria e settore terziario, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Panzieri, R. (1961) ‘Sull’uso capitalistico delle macchine nel neocapitalismo’, in Quaderni Rossi, 1, pp. 486495.Google Scholar
Pardi, T. Krzywdzinski, M. and Luethje, B. (2020) ‘Digital Manufacturing Revolutions as Political Projects and Hypes: Evidences From the Auto Sector’, Geneva, ILO Working Paper 3.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. (1962) ‘Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth’, in The Review of Economic Studies, 29(4), pp. 267279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1981) Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1988) ‘Growing Subsystems, Vertically Hyper-integrated Sectors and the Labour Theory of Value’, in Cambridge Journal of Economics 12(1), pp. 125134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2007) Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians: A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to Be Accomplished, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pugliese, E. (2009) L’inchiesta sociale in Italia Rome, Carocci.Google Scholar
Quesnay, F. (1759 [1972]) ‘Tableau Économique’, in Kuczynski, M. Meek, R. (eds.), Quesnay’s Tableau Économique, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rampa, G. (1986) ‘Misure alternative dell’integrazione fra industria e terziario’, in Pasinetti, L. L. (ed.) Mutamenti strutturali del sistema produttivo. Integrazione tra industria e settore terziario, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1935) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Russo, M. (2019) ‘Digital Transformation in the Automotive Supply Chain: China, Germany, Italy and Japan in a Comparative Perspective’, DEMB Working Paper Series, Università di Modena e ReggioEmilia, 151. http://merlino.unimo.it/campusone/web_dep/wpdemb/0151.pdf.Google Scholar
Simonazzi, A. and Fiorani, G. (2018) ‘Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in Italy’, in Economia & Lavoro, 1, pp. 7186.Google Scholar
Siniscalco, D. and Momigliano, F. (1982) ‘Note in tema di terziarizzazione e deindustrializzazione’, in Moneta e Credito, 35(138), pp. 143182Google Scholar
Stone, R. (1986) ‘Nobel memorial lecture 1984 – the Accounts of Society’, in Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1(1), pp. 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylos, Labini P. (1975) Saggio sulle classi sociali, Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
Sylos, Labini (1986) Le classi sociali negli anni’80, Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar
Trigg, A. (2020) Thirlwall’s Law and Uneven Development under Global Value Chains: A Multi-country Input–Output Approach, in Journal of Economic Structures 9(1), pp. 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigg, A. and Araujo, R. (2018) ‘A Multi-sectoral Approach to the Harrod Foreign Trade Multiplier’, in The European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, Intervention 15(1), pp. 91104.Google Scholar
Trigg, A. and Araujo, R. (2015) A Neo-Kaldorian Approach to Structural Economic Dynamics, in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 33(C) pp. 2536.Google Scholar
United Nations (2009) ‘System of National Accounts 2008’, New York, UN Statistical Division.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×