Mathai, M, Gülmezoglu, AM, Hill, S. WHO Guidelines for the Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage and Retained Placenta. 2009. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75411/1/9789241548502_eng.pdf?ua=1Google Scholar

Begley, CM, Gyte, GM, Murphy, DJ, et al. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;7:CD007412.Google Scholar

Deneux-Tharaux, C, Sentilhes, L, Maillard, F, et al. Effect of routine controlled cord traction as part of the active management of the third stage of labour on postpartum haemorrhage: multicentre randomised controlled trial (TRACOR). BMJ. 2013;346:f1541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1541.Google Scholar

Gulmezoglu, AM, Lumbiganon, P, Landoulsi, S, et al. Active management of the third stage of labour with and without controlled cord traction: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1721–7.Google Scholar

McDonald, SJ, Middleton, P. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD004074.Google Scholar

Combs, CA, Laros, RK Jr. Prolonged third stage of labor: morbidity and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(6):863–7.Google Scholar

Dombrowski, MP, Bottoms, SF, Saleh, AA, Hurd, WW, Romero, R. Third stage of labor: analysis of duration and clinical practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(4, Part 1):1279–84.Google Scholar

Adelusi, B, Soltan, MH, Chowdhury, N, Kangave, D. Risk of retained placenta: multivariate approach. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(5):414–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bais, JM, Eskes, M, Pel, M, Bonsel, GJ, Bleker, OP. Postpartum haemorrhage in nulliparous women: incidence and risk factors in low and high risk women. A Dutch population-based cohort study on standard (> or = 500 ml) and severe (> or = 1000 ml) postpartum haemorrhage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;115(2):166–72.Google Scholar

Chhabra, S, Dhorey, M. Retained placenta continues to be fatal but frequency can be reduced. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22(6):630–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Owolabi, AT, Dare, FO, Fasubaa, OB, et al. Risk factors for retained placenta in southwestern Nigeria. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(7):532–7.Google Scholar

Panpaprai, P, Boriboonhirunsarn, D. Risk factors of retained placenta in Siriraj Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(7):1293–7.Google Scholar

Soltan, MH, Khashoggi, T. Retained placenta and associated risk factors. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17(3):245–7.Google Scholar

Tandberg, A, Albrechtsen, S, Iversen, OE. Manual removal of the placenta: incidence and clinical significance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(1):33–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Titiz, H, Wallace, A, Voaklander, DC. Manual removal of the placenta – a case control study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;41(1):41–4.Google Scholar

Weeks, AD. The retained placenta. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(6):1103–17.Google Scholar

Onwudiegwu, U, Makinde, ON. Retained placenta: a cause of reproductive morbidity in Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;19(4):355–9.Google Scholar

Cheung, WM, Hawkes, A, Ibish, S, Weeks, AD. The retained placenta: historical and geographical rate variations. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(1):37–42.Google Scholar

Endler, M, Grunewald, C, Saltvedt, S. Epidemiology of retained placenta: oxytocin as an independent risk factor. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):801–9.Google Scholar

Westerhoff, G, Cotter, AM, Tolosa, JE. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour to prevent postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD001808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001808.pub2.Google Scholar

Liabsuetrakul, T, Choobun, T, Peeyananjarassri, K, Islam, QM. Prophylactic use of ergot alkaloids in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2:CD005456.Google Scholar

Gulmezoglu, AM, Forna, F, Villar, J, Hofmeyr, GJ. Prostaglandins for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD000494.Google Scholar

McDonald, S, Abbott, JM, Higgins, SP. Prophylactic ergometrine-oxytocin versus oxytocin for the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;1:CD000201.Google Scholar

Leung, SW, Ng, PS, Wong, WY, Cheung, TH. A randomised trial of carbetocin versus syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labour. BJOG. 2006;113(12):1459–64.Google Scholar

Giacalone, PL, Vignal, J, Daures, JP, Boulot, P, Hedon, B, Laffargue, F. A randomised evaluation of two techniques of management of the third stage of labour in women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG. 2000;107(3):396–400.Google Scholar

Chongsomchai, C, Lumbiganon, P, Laopaiboon, M. Prophylactic antibiotics for manual removal of retained placenta in vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2:CD004904.Google Scholar

Weeks, AD, Alia, G, Vernon, G, et al. Umbilical vein oxytocin for the treatment of retained placenta (Release Study): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9709):141–7.Google Scholar

van Beekhuizen, HJ, de Groot, AN, De Boo, T, et al. Sulprostone reduces the need for the manual removal of the placenta in patients with retained placenta: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(2):446–50.Google Scholar

van Beekhuizen, HJ, Tarimo, V, Pembe, AB, Fauteck, H, Lotgering, FK. Misoprostol is not beneficial in the treatment of retained placenta in a low-resource setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;122(3):234–7.Google Scholar

van Stralen, G, Veenhof, M, Holleboom, C, van Roosmalen, J. No reduction of manual removal after misoprostol for retained placenta: a double-blind, randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(4):398–403.Google Scholar

Johanson, R, Cox, C, Grady, K, Howell, C, editors. Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma: The MOET Course Manual. 2nd edition. London: RCOG Press; 2007.Google Scholar

Rao, KP, Belogolovkin, V, Yankowitz, J, Spinnato, JA. Abnormal placentation: evidence-based diagnosis and management of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2012;67(8):503–19.Google Scholar

Herman, A. Complicated third stage of labor: time to switch on the scanner. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15(2):89–95.Google Scholar