Skip to main content Accessibility help
×

Maintenance Message

Cambridge Core ecommerce is unavailable Sunday 08/12/2024 from 08:00 – 18:00 (GMT). This is due to site maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience.

Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-08T17:02:44.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - LAPAROSCOPIC VASCULAR SURGERY IN 2007

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

Camran Nezhat
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Farr Nezhat
Affiliation:
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Ceana Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Vascular surgery has been one of the last fields in surgery to incorporate laparoscopy. This may largely be the result of the fact that laparoscopic control of bleeding remains challenging and vascular procedures inherently involve bleeding. However, recent improvements in laparoscopic approach, exposure, and instrumentation have resulted in an increase in the number of surgeons performing laparoscopic vascular surgery (LVS). Here, we present an overview of the current advantages, disadvantages, and special considerations of LVS and provide a description of the laparoscopic technique for aorto-bifemoral bypass.

CURRENT INDICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS

Laparoscopy is a surgical approach and must not change the indications or contraindications for surgery. This means that the same type of operation is performed laparoscopically as it is performed conventionally (e.g., the proximal and distal targets of a bypass are independent of the surgical approach). Currently, LVS is mainly performed for the treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease and abdominal aortic aneurysms. For aorto-iliac occlusive disease, LVS has become complementary to endovascular repair. The Transatlantic Society Consensus (TASC) has described the respective indications for conventional and endovascular repair for occlusive diseases. From these guidelines, patients not amenable to endovascular repair (TASC types C and D), and with non-massive aortic calcifications, represent the most suitable candidates for LVS.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×