Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T09:30:08.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Martin Fransman
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The New ICT Ecosystem
Implications for Policy and Regulation
, pp. 228 - 237
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbate, J., 1999. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P., 2006. ‘Joseph Schumpeter Lecture: Appropriate Growth Policy. A Unifying Framework’. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 2–3: 269–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ake, B.Å., 1988. Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation. London: PinterGoogle Scholar
Alleman, J. and Rappoport, P., 2005. ‘Regulatory Failure: Time for a New Policy Paradigm’. Communications & Strategies, 60, 4: 105–21Google Scholar
Antonelli, C., 1999. The Microdynamics of Technological Change. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, C., 2001. The Microeconomics of Technological Systems. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, C., 2002. The Economics of Innovation, New Technologies and Structural Change. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, C., (ed.) 2006. New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology: Essays in Honour of Paul A. David. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battelle, J., 2005. The Search: How Google and its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. Boston, MA: Nicholas BrealeyGoogle Scholar
Booth, P., 2006. ‘Processes and Institutions: New Perspectives on Policy Making and Regulatory Authorities’, in Richards, E., Foster, R. and Kiedrowski, T. (eds.), Communications: The Next Decade. A Collection of Essays Prepared for the UK Office of Communications. London: OfcomCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, G. W., 1994. Telecommunication Policy for the Information Age: From Monopoly to Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Buigues, P. A. and Rey, P. (eds.), 2004. The Economics of Antitrust and Regulation in Telecommunications: Perspectives for the New European Regulatory Framework. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantner, U. and Malerba, F. (eds.), 2007. Innovation, Industrial Dynamics and Structural Transformation: Schumpeterian Legacies. Berlin: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, M., 1997. ‘The Evolution of Telecommunications Regulation in the UK’. European Economic Review, 41: 691–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, M.et al. (eds.), 2005. Handbook of Telecommunications Economics: Vol. 1. Structure, Regulation and Competition. Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Cerf, V., 1989. The Internet Activities Board, Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), Network Working Group, Request for Comments, RFC 1120
Cerf, V. 1993. ‘How the Internet Came to Be’, in Aboba, B. (ed.), The Online User's Encyclopedia. Reading, MA: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Chapuis, R. J. and Joel, A. E., 1990. 100 Years of Telephone Switching, II.: Electronics, Computers and Telephone Switching. A Book of Technological History, 1960–1985. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
,Commission Guidelines (2002). ‘Commission Guidelines on Market Analysis and the Assessment of Significant Market Power Under the Community Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services’, 11 July 2002. 2002/C 165/03
Conceicao, P., Heitor, M. V. and Lundval, B.-Å., 2003. Innovation, Competence Building, and Social Cohesion in Europe: Towards a Learning Society. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. and Foray, D., 1997. ‘The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 3: 595–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, R. W., 2005. Competition and Chaos: US Telecommunications Since the 1996 Telecom Act. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution PressGoogle Scholar
Crandall, R. W. and Alleman, J. H., 2002. Broadband: Should we Regulate High-Speed Internet Access?Washington, DC: AEI – Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory StudiesGoogle Scholar
Crandall, R. W. and Waverman, L., 1996. Talk is Cheap: Declining Costs, New Competition and Regulatory Reform in Telecommunications. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution PressGoogle Scholar
David, P. A. and Steinmueller, W. E., 1994. ‘Economics of Compatibility Standards and Competition in Telecommunications Networks’. Information Economics and Policy, 6: 217–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedrick, J. and Kraemer, K. L., 1998. Asia's Computer Challenge. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Desai, A., 2006. India's Telecommunications Industry. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Sola Pool, I. and Noam, E. M. (eds.), 1990. Technologies without Boundaries: On Telecommunications in a Global Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Directive 2002/19/EC (2002). ‘Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on Access to, and Interconnection of, Electronic Communications Networks and Associated Facilities (Access Directive)’. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 108/7
,Directive 2002/20/EC (2002). ‘Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the Authorisation of Electronic Communications Networks and Services (Authorisation Directive)’. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 108/21
,Directive 2002/21/EC (2002). ‘Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services (Framework Directive)’, 7 March 2002. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 108/33
Dosi, G. and Nelson, R. R., 1998. ‘Evolutionary Theories’, in Arena, R. and Longhi, C. (eds.), Markets and Organization. Berlin: Springer: 205–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Teece, D. J. and Chytry, J. (eds.), 1998. Technology Organization, and Competitiveness: Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Teece, D. J. and Chytry, J.The Economist, 2007. Special Report. 10 February
Edquist, C., 2004. ‘The Fixed Internet and Mobile Telecommunications Sectoral System of Innovation: Equipment Production, Access Provision and Content Provision’, in Malerba, F. (ed.), Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Edquist, C., 2005. ‘Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges’, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Edquist, C. and McKelvey, M., 2000. Systems of Innovation: Growth, Competitiveness and Employment: Vol. II. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Eisenmann, T. R., Parwer, G. and Alstyne, M. 2008. ‘Opening Platforms: How, When and Why?’, Harvard Business School Working Paper, 09–030Google Scholar
,European Commission, 1999. ‘Towards a New Framework for Electronic Communications Infrastructure and Associated Services: The 1999 Communications Review’. COM (1999), 539Google Scholar
,European Commission, 2000. ‘The Results of the Public Consultation on the 1999 Communications Review and Orientations for the New Regulatory Framework’. COM (2000), 239 finalGoogle Scholar
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. (eds.), 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Foray, D., 2004. Economics of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M., 1986. ‘International Competitiveness, International Diffusion of Technology and the State: A Case Study from Taiwan and Japan’. World Development, 14, 12: 1375–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1988. ‘The Japanese System and the Acquisition, Assimilation and Further Development of Technological Knowledge: Organizational Form, Markets and Government’, in Elliott, B. (ed.), Technology and Social Process. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1990. The Market and Beyond: Information Technology in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1991. ‘What We Know About the Japanese Innovation System and What We Need to Know’, in Inose, H.et al. (eds.), Science and Technology Policy Research. Tokyo: MITA: 445–64Google Scholar
Fransman, M. 1993. The Market and Beyond: Information Technology in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (awarded the 1991 Masayoshi Ohira Memorial Prize)Google Scholar
Fransman, M. 1994a. ‘The Japanese Innovation System: How it Works’, in Dodgson, M. and Rothwell, R. (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Aldershot: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1994b. ‘Information, Knowledge, Vision and Theories of the Firm’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 2: 1–45, reprinted in G. Dosi, D. J. Teece and J. Chytry (eds.), Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness: Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1994c. ‘AT&T, BT and NTT: A Comparison of Vision, Strategy and Competence’. Telecommunications Policy, 18, 2: 137–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1994d. ‘AT&T, BT and NTT: The Role of R&D’. Telecommunications Policy, 18, 4: 295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1995a. Japan's Computer and Communications Industry: The Evolution of Industrial Grants and Global Competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1995b. ‘Is National Technology Policy Obsolete in a Globalised World?: The Japanese Response’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19: 95–119Google Scholar
Fransman, M. 1996. ‘The Future of Japanese Telecommunications’. Telecommuni-cations Policy, 20, 2: 83–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1997. ‘Towards a New Agenda for Japanese Telecommunications’. Telecommunications Policy, 21, 2: 185–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1999a. Viscous of Innovation: The Firm and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 1999b. ‘Where Are the Japanese? Japanese Information and Communications Firms in an Internetworked World’. Telecommunications Policy, 23: 317–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 2001. ‘Evolution of the Telecommunications Industry into the Internet Age’. Communications & Strategies, 43, 3: 57–113Google Scholar
Fransman, M. 2002a. Telecoms in the Internet Age: From Boom to Bust to …?Oxford: Oxford University Press (awarded the 2003 Wadsworth Prize)Google Scholar
Fransman, M. 2002b. ‘Mapping the Evolving Telecoms Industry: The Uses and Shortcomings of the Layer Model’. Telecommunications Policy, 26, 9/10: 473–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 2003. ‘Evolution of the Telecommunications Industry’, in Madden, G. (ed.), The International Handbook of Telecommunications Economics: Vol. III. Aldershot: Edward Elgar: 15–38Google Scholar
Fransman, M. 2004. ‘The Telecoms Boom and Bust 1996–2003 and the Role of Financial Markets’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 4: 369–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. (ed.) 2006. Global Broadband Battles: Why the US and Europe Lag While Asia Leads. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. 2007a. ‘Innovation in the New ICT Ecosystem’. Communications and Strategies, 68, 4: 1–22Google Scholar
Fransman, M. 2007b. The New ICT Ecosystem – Implications for Europe. Edinburgh: Koroko (awarded the 2008–9 Joseph Schumpeter Price)Google Scholar
Fransman, M. 2009. How Innovation Happens and What Should be Done to Encourage It, paper prepared for the OECD Innovation Strategy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. and Krafft, J., 2002. ‘Telecommunications Industry’, in Lazonick, W. (ed.), The Handbook of Economics: International Encyclopedia of Business and Management. London: ThomsonGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C., 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: PinterGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C. and Louca, F., 2002. As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidman, T., 2006. The World is Flat: The Globalized World in the 21st Century. London: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Gawer, A. (ed.), 2009. Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawer, A. and Cusumano, M., 2006. Platform Leadership. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H., 2005. The Economics of Mobile Telecommunications. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddon, L., 2005. Everyday Innovators: Researching the Role of Users in Shaping ICTs. Dordrecht: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A., 1945. ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’. American Economic Review, 35, 4: 519–30Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. and Simpson, S., 2005. Globalisation, Convergence and European Telecommunications Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
,International Standards Organisation (ISO), 1994. Information Technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model. Geneva: ISO
Johnson, C., 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kahin, B. and Foray, D. (eds.), 2006. Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. E. (ed.), 2003. Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
Kelly, K., 2003. Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems and the Economic World. Reading, MA: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M., 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Kim, L., 1997. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
Komiya, R., Okuno, M. and Suzumura, K. (eds.), 1988. Industrial Policy of Japan. San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Laffont, J.-J., Rey, P. and Tirole, J. 1997. ‘Competition between Telecommuni-cations Operators’. European Economic Review, 41: 701–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffont, J.-J. 1998. ‘Network Competition: I. Overview and Non-Discriminatory Pricing’, RAND Journal of Economics, 29: 1–37Google Scholar
Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J., 1994. Creating Competition through Interconnection: Theory and Practice. Toulouse: IDEIGoogle Scholar
Laffont, J.-J. 2000. Competition in Telecommunications. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Levine, R., Locke, C., Searls, D. and Weinberger, D., 2000. The Cluetrain Manifesto. The End of Business Usual. New York: Perseus BooksGoogle Scholar
Levy, B. and Spiller, P. T., 1994. ‘The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Commitment: A Comparative Analysis of Telecommunications Regulation’. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 10: 201–46Google Scholar
Lo, Andrew W., 2004. ‘The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis: Market Efficiency from an Evolutionary Perspective’. Journal of Portfolio Management, 30th Anniversary Issue 2004: 15–299Google Scholar
Loasby, B., 2001. ‘Organisations as Interpretative Systems’. Revue d'Économie Industrielle, 97, 4: 17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loasby, B., 2003. ‘The Innovative Mind’, paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2003 on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge, Copenhagen, 12–14 June
Lu, Q., 2003. China's Leap into the Information Age: Innovation and Organization in the Computer Industry. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lundval, B.-Å., 1988. ‘Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User–Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation’, in Dosi, G., Freeman, C. and Nelson, R. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter: 349–69Google Scholar
Lundval, B.-Å. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: PinterGoogle Scholar
Lundval, B.-Å. 2002. Innovation, Growth and Social Cohesion: The Danish Model. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundval, B.-Å., et al. 2002. The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Majumdar, S. K., Care, M. and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), 2005. Handbook of Telecommunications Economics: Vol. 2. Technology Evolution and the Internet. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-HollandGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F., 1995. ‘Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 1: 47–66Google Scholar
Malerba, F., 2002. ‘Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production’. Research Policy, 31: 247–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F., (ed.), 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F., 2005. ‘Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors’, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L., 1990. ‘Technological Regimes and Patterns of Innovation: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Italian Case’, in Heertje, A. (ed.), Evolving Industries and Market Structures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
Malthus, T., 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population, eds. Winch, D. and James, P.. Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Mansell, R., 1994. The New Telecommunications: A Political Economy of Network Evolution. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Mansell, R., (ed.), 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Mansell, R. and Steinmueller, E., 2000. Mobilizing the Information Society: Strategies for Growth and Opportunity. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Margulis, L. and Sagan, D., 1988. Microcosmos: Four Billion Years of Evolution from Our Microbial Ancestors. New York: Summit BooksGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. 1885. The Present Position of Economics. London: Macmillan & Co. 1889. ‘Co-operation’, in Memorials of Alfred Marshall, A.C. Pigou (ed.). London: Macmillan & Co., 1925: 227–55Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S., 1890. Principles of Economics, 8th edn. London: Macmillan 1962Google Scholar
Marshall, A., 1920a. Principles of Economics, ed. With annotations by Guillebaud, C. W., 2 vols.London: Macmillan & Co., 1961Google Scholar
Marshall, A., 1920b. Industry and Trade: A Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organization; and of Their Influences on the Conditions of Various Classes and Nations. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S., 1995. ‘Technology Systems and Technology Policy in an Evolutionary Framework’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 1: 25–46Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S., 1998. Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction: The Graz Schumpeter Lectures. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S., 2002. ‘Knowledge of Growth and the Growth of Knowledge’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 1–2: 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S., 2004. ‘The Entrepreneur and the Style of Modern Economics’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 2: 157–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meurling, J., 1985. A Switch in Time. Chicago: Telephony Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
Millman, S. (ed.), 1984. A History of Engineering and Science in the Bell System: Communications Sciences (1925–1980). Murray Hill, NJ: AT&T Bell LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
Mindel, J. L. and Sicker, D. C. 2006. ‘Leveraging the EU Regulatory Framework to Improve a Layered Policy Model for US Telecommunications Markets’. Telecommunications Policy, 30, 2: 136–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC), 2007. ‘2007 White Paper: Information and Communications in Japan. Progress of Ubiquitous Economy and Global Business Development’. Tokyo, July
Morton, J. A., 1971. Organizing for Innovation: A Systems Approach to Technical Management. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D. C. and Nelson, R. R. (eds.), 1999. Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R., 1998. ‘The Co-evolution of Technology Industrial Structure and Supporting Institutions’, in Dosi, G., Teece, D. J. and Chytry, J. (eds.), Technology Organization and Competitiveness: Perspectives on Industrial and Corporate Change. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R., 2002. ‘Bringing Institutions into Evolutionary Growth Theory’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 1–2: 17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (ed.), 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R., 2005. The Limits of Market Organization. New York: Russell SageGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Nihoul, P. and Rodford, P., 2004. EU Electronic Communications Law: Competition and Regulation in the European Telecommunications Market. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Noam, E. M., 1994. ‘Beyond Liberalization: From the Network of Networks to the System of Systems’. Telecommunications Policy, 18: 286–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D., 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuechterlien, J. E. and Weiser, P. J., 2005. American Telecommunications Policy in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
,Ofcom, 2006. Communications–The Next Decade: A Collection of Essays Prepared for the UK Office of Communications, eds. E. Richards, R. Foster and T. Kiedrowski. London: Ofcom
,Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2007. Various dates. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. Paris: OECD
O'Reilly, T., 2007. ‘What is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software’. Communications & Strategies, 65: 17–37Google Scholar
Pavitt, K., 1999. Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
Petit, P. and Soete, L. (eds.), 2001. Technology and the Future of European Employment. Northampton, MA: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, L. S., 1985. The Making of American Industrial Research: Science and Business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N., 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A., 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: UnwinGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1961. Theory of Economic Development. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. R., 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
Shelanski, H. A., 2005. ‘Inter-Modal Competition and Telecommunications Policy in the United States’. Communications & Strategies, 60: 15–37Google Scholar
Silverstone, R. (ed.), 2005. Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe: From Information to Communication. Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., 1776. The Wealth of Nations. London and New York: J. M. Dent, 1912Google Scholar
Soete, L. and Weel, B., 2005. The Economics of the Digital Society. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmueller, W. E., 2000. ‘Will New Information and Communication Technologies Improve the “Codification” of Knowledge?’. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 2: 361–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, C., Bernt, P. W. and Weiss, M. H., 2006. Shaping American Telecommunications: A History of Technology, Policy and Economics. New Jersey: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Tapscott, D. and Williams, A. D., 2006. How mass collaboration Changes Everything. New York: PortfolioGoogle Scholar
Thomke, S. and Hippel, E., 2002. ‘Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value’. Harvard Business Review, 1 AprilGoogle Scholar
,UBS, 2007. Global Equity Strategy. UBS Investment Research, 7 February
Ark, B., Inklar, R. and McGuckin, R., 2002. ‘Changing Gear: Productivity, ICT and Services: Europe and the United States’. GGDC Working Papers, GD 60
Varian, H. R., Farrell, J. and Shapiro, C., 2004. The Economics of Information Technology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogelsang, I., 2002. ‘Incentive Regulation and Competition in Public Utility Markets: A 20-year Perspective’. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 22, 1: 5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hippel, E., 1988. The Source of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hippel, E. 1998. ‘Economics of Product Development by Users: The Impact of “Sticky” Local Information’. Management Science, 44, 5: 629–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walden, I. and Angel, J. (eds.), 2005. Telecommunications Law and Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Waverman, L. and Sirel, E., 1997. ‘European Telecommunications Markets on the Verge of Full Liberalization’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 4: 113–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessner, C. W., 2006. The Telecommunications Challenge: Changing Technologies and Evolving Policies. Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
Witt, U., 2001. ‘Economic Growth – What Happens on the Demand Side?’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11, 1: 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Martin Fransman, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: The New ICT Ecosystem
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676130.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Martin Fransman, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: The New ICT Ecosystem
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676130.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Martin Fransman, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: The New ICT Ecosystem
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676130.020
Available formats
×