INTRODUCTION

This chapter reviews the second generation of foreign policy research. It discusses the strategies that individuals and groups employ when dealing with problems in terms of the decisional stages outlined in chapter 2. The discussion will be both integrative and critical. I will attempt to group together rather diverse theoretical and empirical studies into general models of foreign policy decision making, and connect levels of analysis in the process. This will enable assessment of the progress made during the second generation of foreign policy research.

The shift from research focusing on identification of inputs and the construction of input-output frameworks toward theories of decision making processes is attributable to a profound dissatisfaction with the nature and quality of the scholarly product of the former research orientation. The key assumption of the second stage of decision making research was that the proliferation of decisional inputs and the apparent failure to integrate these inputs was due to a failure to explore how various inputs affected the strategies of selecting and appraising alternatives by decision makers. If decision making processes are described rigorously, one could construct more valid hypotheses regarding the effects of various inputs on the process, thereby narrowing down the rather long laundry-list of exogenous factors. Alternatively, one can group together seemingly distinct inputs in a coherent fashion insofar as such inputs are presumed to affect stages of the decision process.