Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:43:39.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Ruth Page
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Narratives Online
Shared Stories in Social Media
, pp. 212 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, A. (2011) ‘Meet mediatisation’, Language & Communication 31 (3), pp. 163170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albawardi, A. (2016) ‘Digital literacy practices of Saudi university students’. Conference on Social Media in the Arab World, University of Reading, 3 June.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2010) ‘Localising the global on the participatory web’, in Coupland, N. (ed.) Handbook of language and globalization. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 203231.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2011) ‘From variation to heteroglossia in the study of computer mediated discourse’, in Thurlow, C. and Mroczek, K. (eds) Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277298.Google Scholar
Annunziato, S. (2011) ‘The Amanda Knox case: The representation of Italy in American media coverage’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 31 (1), pp. 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, L. (2014) AntConc (3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at: www.laurenceanthony.net (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Antony, M. G. and Thomas, R. J. (2010) ‘“This is citizen journalism at its finest”: YouTube and the public sphere in the Oscar Grant shooting incident’, New Media & Society 12 (8), pp. 12801296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. (2004) ‘Querying keywords: questions of difference, frequency and sense in keywords analysis’, Journal of English Linguistics 32 (4), pp. 346359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. and Egbert, J. (eds) (2016) Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Kryzanowski, M., McEnery, A. M. and Wodak, R. (2008) ‘A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press’, Discourse and Society 19 (3), pp. 273306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. and McEnery, T. (2013) Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1984) Rabelais and his world [1965]. Translated by Iswolsky, H. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. and Georgakopoulou, A. (2008) ‘Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis’, Text & Talk 28 (3), pp. 377396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. S. and Ling, R. (2011) ‘Necessary smileys and useless periods’, Visible Language 45 (1), pp. 4567.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. (1990) ‘Poetics and performances as critical perspectives on language and social life’, Annual Review of Anthropology 191 (1), pp. 5988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. (2012) ‘“Value added”: Language, image and news values’, Discourse, Context & Media 1, pp. 103113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. (2014) ‘Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analyzing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond’, Discourse & Society 25 (2), pp. 135158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. (2017) The discourse of news values: How news organizations create ‘newsworthiness’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. (1991) The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J. and Davies, M. (2015) ‘Exploring the composition of the searchable Web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers’, Corpora 10 (1), pp. 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, A., Creese, A. and Hu, R. (2016) ‘The structure of everyday narrative in a city market: An ethnopoetics approach’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (5), pp. 654676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitvich, P. G. C., Bou-Franch, P. and Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2013) ‘Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show Idol’, Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1), pp. 97121.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., Arnaut, K., Rampton, B. and Spotti, M. (2016) Language and superdiversity. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bober, M. (2014) ‘Twitter and TV events: An exploration of how to use social media for student-led research’, ASLIB Journal for Information Management 66 (3), pp. 297312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogaerts, J. and Carpentier, N. (2012) ‘The postmodern challenge to journalism: Strategies for constructing a trustworthy identity’, in Peters, C. and Broersma, M. (eds) Rethinking journalism: trust and participation in a transformed news landscape. London: Routledge, pp. 6071.Google Scholar
Bolander, B. (2012) ‘Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness’, Journal of Pragmatics 44, pp. 16071622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolander, B. and Locher, M. (2014) ‘Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues’, Discourse, Context & Media 3, pp. 1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondi, M. and Scott, M. (2010) Keyness in texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bou Franch, P. and Blitvich, P. G. C. (2012) ‘Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube’, Journal of Pragmatics 73, pp. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, D. (2014) It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, D., Golder, S. and Lotan, G. (2010) ‘Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter’, 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 5–8 January. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5428313/ (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
British Association for Applied Linguistics (2016) ‘Recommendations on good practice in applied linguistics’. Available at: https://baalweb.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/goodpractice_stud.pdf (accessed 5 September 2017).Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, J. and Hayes, G. (2011) ‘“We will never forget you [online]”: An empirical investigation of post-mortem MySpace comments’, CSCW 2011, March 19–23, Hangzhou, China.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1986) ‘Two modes of thought’, in Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1143.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1991) ‘The narrative construction of reality’, Critical Inquiry 18, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Bruns, A (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and beyond: From production to produsage. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bruns, A. and Highfield, T. (2013) ‘Political networks on Twitter’, Information, Communication and Society 16 (5), pp. 667–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunton, F. (2012) ‘Constitutive interference: Spam and online communities’, Representations 117 (1), pp. 3058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. and Green, J. (2009) YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bury, R., Deller, R., Greenwood, A. and Jones, B. (2013) ‘From Usenet to Tumblr: The changing role of social media’, Participations 10 (1), pp. 299319.Google Scholar
Buschow, C., Schneider, B. and Ueberheide, S. (2014) ‘Tweeting television: Exploring communication activities on Twitter while watching TV’, Communications 39 (2), pp. 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, C. (1992) ‘Reporting speech in narrative discourse: Stylistic and ideological implications’, Ilha do Desterro 27, pp. 6782.Google Scholar
Caple, H. (2010) ‘Doubling-up: allusion and bonding in multi-semiotic news stories’, in Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R. (eds) New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 111133.Google Scholar
Caple, H. (2013) Photojournalism: A social semiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caple, H. (2017) ‘Results, resolve, reaction: Words, images and the functional structure of online match reports’, in Caldwell, D., Walsh, J., Vine, E. W. and Jureidini, J. (eds) The discourse of sport: Analyses from social linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, 209227.Google Scholar
Chess, S. and Newsom, E. (2015) Folklore, horror stories and The Slender Man: The development of an internet mythology. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chibba, S. (2014) A media guide to the Oscar Pistorius trial. Available at: www.mediaclubsouthafrica.com/land-and-people/3727-a-multimedia-guide-to-the-oscar-pistorius-trial (accessed 17 March 2017).Google Scholar
Clark, K. (1992) ‘The linguistics of blame: Representations of women in The Sun's reporting of crimes of sexual violence’, in Toolan, M. (ed.) Language, text and context. London: Routledge, pp. 208224.Google Scholar
Clifford, K. (2014) ‘Amanda Knox: A picture of innocence’, Celebrity Studies 5 (4), pp. 504507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conboy, M. (2006) Tabloid Britain: Constructing a community through language. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cotter, C. (2010) News talk: Investigating the language of journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, J. (2000) Small talk. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2011) Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B. and Harré, R. (1990) ‘Positioning: The discursive construction of selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20, pp. 4363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, G. (2012) ‘Paleontology in parts: Richard Owen, William John Broderip and the serialization of science in early Victorian Britain’, Isis 103, pp. 637667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayter, D. (2015) ‘Small stories and extended narratives on Twitter’, Discourse, Context & Media 5, pp. 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W. (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A. (2003) Identity in narrative: A study in immigrant discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (2012) Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Robillard, B. (2014) ‘“Our Caster” and “The Blade Runner”: “Improper” corporealities cripqueering the post/apartheid body politic’, Image & Text 24, pp. 79115.Google Scholar
Deery, J. (2014) ‘Mapping commercialization in reality television’, in Oullette, L. (ed.) A companion to reality television. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1128.Google Scholar
Deller, R. (2011) ‘Twittering on: Audience research and participation using Twitter’, Participations 8 (1). Available at: www.participations.org/volume%208/issue%201/deller.htm (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Deumert, A. (2014) Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, M., Rowland, D. and Lawson, S. (2012) ‘Who is on your Sofa? TV audience communities and second screening social networks’, Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, Berlin, Germany, 4–6 July, 2012, pp. 7986. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2325635 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Draucker, F. and Collister, L. B. (2015) ‘Managing participation through modal affordances on Twitter’, Open Library of Humanities 1 (1). Available at: https://olh.openlibhums.org/articles/10.16995/olh.21/ (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (2007) ‘The stance triangle’, in Englebretson, R. (ed.) Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 139182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (1992) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duszak, A. (ed.) (2002) Us and others. Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, M. (2009) ‘Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour’, Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (5), pp. 12841299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, G. (2001) A critique of politeness theory. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Ekström, M. (2000) ‘Information, storytelling and attractions: TV journalism in three modes of communication’, Media, Culture and Society 22, pp. 465492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. (2016) ‘Stance and identity in Twitter hashtags’, Language@Internet 13 (1). Available at: www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2016/evans (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Facebook Helpdesk (2016) What names are allowed on Facebook. Available at: www.facebook.com/help/112146705538576 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and power. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Firer-Blaess, S. and Fuchs, C. (2014) ‘Wikipedia: An info-communist manifesto’, Television and New Media 15 (2), pp. 87103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, J. (1987) Television culture. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fiske, J. (1992) ‘Audiencing: A cultural studies approach to watching television’, Poetics 21 (4), pp. 345359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, R. and Rintel, S. (2013) ‘From lifeguard to bitch: How a story character becomes a promiscuous category in a couple's video call’, Australian Journal of Communication 40 (2), pp. 101118.Google Scholar
Forceville, C. and Clark, B. (2014) ‘Can pictures have explicatures?’, Linguagem Em Discurso 14 (3), pp. 121.Google Scholar
Forman, A., Kern, R. and Gil-Egui, G. (2012) ‘Death and mourning as sources of community participation in online social networks: RIP pages in Facebook’, First Monday 17 (9). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3935/3288 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1991) Language in the news. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gee, J. (2004) Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1980) Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Translated by Lewin, J. E. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2005) ‘“Same old story?” On the interactional dynamics of shared narratives’, in Quasthoff, U. and Becker, T. (eds) Narrative interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 223241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2007) Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2008) ‘“On MSN with buff boys”: Self- and other- identity claims in the context of small stories’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 15, pp. 597626.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2013a) ‘Small stories research and social media: The role of narrative stance-taking in the circulation of a Greek news story’. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, Paper 100.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2013b) ‘Small stories and identities analysis as a framework for the study of im/politeness-in-interaction’, Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1), pp. 5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2014) ‘Small stories, transposition and social media: A micro-perspective on the Greek crisis’, Discourse & Society 25 (4), pp. 519539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2015) ‘Sharing as rescripting: Place manipulations on YouTube, between narrative and social media affordances’, Discourse, Context & Media 9, pp. 6472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2016) ‘From narrating the self to posting self(ies): A small stories approach to selfies’, Open Linguistics 2(1), pp. 300317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giaxoglou, K. (2015a) ‘Entextualising mourning on Facebook: stories of grief as acts of sharing’, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 21(1–2) pp. 87105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giaxoglou, K. (2015b) ‘#JesuisCharlie: Narrative stance-taking in shared stories of global mourning’. The 6th International Language in the Media Conference, Hamburg, 7–9 September 2015.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (1977) ‘The theory of affordances’, in Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 6782.Google Scholar
Goddard, M., Halligan, B. and Hegarty, P. (2012) Reverberations: The philosophy, aesthetics and politics of noise. London and New York: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goode, L. (2009) ‘Social news, citizen journalism and democracy’, New Media & Society 11 (8), pp. 12871305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, L., McCollough, A. and O'Hare, G. (2011) ‘Unruly publics and the fourth estate on YouTube’, Participations 8 (2), pp. 594615.Google Scholar
Goodson, M. and Kwasny, R. (2016) ‘Apparently false news attracts widespread coverage in UK newspapers’. Available at: https://evolution.ai/jo-cox-twitter (accessed 14 December 2016).Google Scholar
Gray, J. (2005) ‘Antifandom and the moral text: Television without pity and textual dislike’, American Behavioral Scientist 48 (7), pp. 840858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds) Syntax and semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 4158.Google Scholar
Grishakova, M. and Ryan, M. L. (eds) (2010) Intermediality and storytelling. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günther, S. (2005) ‘Narrative reconstructions of past experiences: Adjustments and modifications in the process of recontextualizing a past experience’, in Quasthoff, U. and Becker, T. (eds) Narrative interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 285302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edition. London and New York: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hardaker, C. (2013) ‘“Uh…..not to be nitpicky,,,,,but…the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.”: An overview of trolling strategies’, Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1 (1), pp. 5786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, C. (2015) ‘“I refuse to respond to this obvious troll”: An overview of responses to (perceived) trolling’, Corpora 10 (2), pp. 201229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, C. and McGlashan, M. (2016) ‘“Real men don't hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity’, Journal of Pragmatics 91, pp. 8093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, S. and Jones, B. (2013) ‘Fifty shades of ghey: Snark fandom and the figure of the anti-fan’, Sexualities 16 (8), pp. 951968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, S. (2013) ‘Tweeting about the telly: Live TV, audiences and social media’, in Weller, K., Bruns, A., Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. and Jean Burgess, J. (eds) Twitter and society. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 276248.Google Scholar
Harvey, C. (2015) ‘What's disability got to do with it? Changing constructions of Oscar Pistorius before and after the Death of Reeva Steenkamp’, Disability & Society 30 (2), pp. 299304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, M. (2015) Im/politeness implicatures. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, D. (1997) ‘Scripts, sequences and stories: Elements of a postclassical narratology’, Publications of the Modern Language Association 112 (5), pp. 10461059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, D. (2002) Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Herman, D. (2004) ‘Toward a transmedial narratology’, in Ryan, M. L. (ed.) Narrative across media: The languages of storytelling. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 4775.Google Scholar
Herman, L. and Vervaeck, B. (2005) Handbook of narrative analysis. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Herring, S. (1994) ‘Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame’, in Bucholtz, M. (ed.) Cultural performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Women and Language Group, pp. 278294.Google Scholar
Herring, S. (2007) ‘A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse’, Language@Internet 4. Available at: www.languageatInternet.org/articles/2007/761 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Herring, S. (2013) ‘Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent’. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 2011: discourse 2.0: language and new media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 125.Google Scholar
Herring, S. and Dainas, A. R. (2017) ‘“Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads’. Proceedings of the Fiftieth Hawai'I International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-50). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. Available at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/hicss.graphicons.pdf (accessed 10 March 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, M. (2010) ‘Connecting to everything you care about’. Notes by Facebook, 19 April 2010. Available at: www.facebook.com/notes/facebook/connecting-to-everything-you-care-about/382978412130 (accessed 30 January 2017).Google Scholar
Highfield, T., Harrington, S. and Bruns, A. (2013) ‘Twitter as a technology of audiencing and fandom’, Information, Communication and Society 16 (3), pp. 315339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M. (2001) Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, C. R. (ed.) (2010) Telling a story in the age of new media. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. (2014) ‘Intertextuality and allusion’, in Stockwell, P. and Whiteley, S. (eds) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, J. T. (2016) ‘Nielsen is adding Facebook to its social TV ratings’. Available at: http://fortune.com/2016/01/20/nielsen-facebook-social-tv (accessed 8 September 2015).Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. (1996) Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. (2006) A theory of adaptation. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004) ‘A note on laughter in “male-female” interaction’, Discourse Studies 6 (1), pp. 117133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
John, N. (2013) ‘Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword’, New Media & Society 15 (2), pp. 167182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. (2005) ‘Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse’, in Norris, S. and Jones, R. (eds) Discourses in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. New York: Routledge, pp. 141154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. (2012) Discourse and creativity. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Jones, R. and Hafner, C. (2012) Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. (2013) ‘Narrative dynamics in the competitive reality show’, Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies 5, pp. 5575.Google Scholar
Kellner, D. (2009) ‘Media spectacle and the 2008 Presidential election’, Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies 9 (6), pp. 707716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R., Forman, A. E. and Gil-Egui, G. (2013) ‘R.I.P.: Remain in perpetuity: Facebook memorial pages’, Telematics and Informatics 30 (1), pp. 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klink, M. (2010) Laugh out loud in real life: Women's humor and fan identity. Unpublished Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2012) ‘How to analyse collective identity in discourse: Textual and contextual parameters’, Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines 5 (2), pp. 1938.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading images. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2013) The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967) ‘Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience’, in Helm, J. (ed.) Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, pp. 1244.Google Scholar
Lambrou, M. (2014) ‘Narrative, text and time: Telling the same story twice in the oral narrative reporting of 7/7’, Language and Literature 23 (1), pp. 3248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, A. and Locher, M. (2012) ‘Ways of communicating stance in online disagreements’, Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12), pp. 15911606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, A. O. and Moe, H. (2011) ‘Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign’, New Media & Society 14 (5), pp. 729–47.Google Scholar
Lee, C. K. (2007) ‘Affordances and text-making practices in online instant messaging’, Written Communication 24 (3), pp. 223249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitch, T. (2008) ‘Adaptation studies at a crossroads’, Adaptation 1 (1), pp. 6377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddle, R. (2011) ‘What does it take to save a she-devil? Good PR’, Spectator 8. Available at: www.spectator.co.uk/2011/10/what-does-it-take-to-save-a-shedevil-good-pr/ (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar
Linde, C. (1993) Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, S. (2012) ‘“It took me about half an hour, but I did it!”: Media circuits and affinity spaces around how-to videos on YouTube’, European Journal of Communication 27(2), pp. 152170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, M. and Watts, R. (2005) ‘Politeness theory and relational work’, Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, M. and Watts, R. (2008) ‘Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour’, in Bousfield, D. and Locher, M. (eds) Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 7799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveland, J. and Reagle, J. (2013) ‘Wikipedia and encyclopedic production’, New Media & Society 15 (8), pp. 12941311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J. F. (1984) The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge [1979]. Translated by Bennington, G. and Massumi, B. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Maagaard, C. (2014) ‘Employee testimonials: Animating corporate messages through employees’ stories’, Discourse, Context & Media 6, pp. 2232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. (2004) ‘Building the world's visual language: the increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media’, Visual Communication 3 (3), pp. 316336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012) How to do Critical Discourse Analysis: A multimodal introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2013) ‘Personalising crime and crime-fighting in factual television: an analysis of social actors and transitivity in language and images’, Critical Discourse Studies 10 (4), pp. 356372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, M. (2016) ‘Corpus stylistics’, in Sotirova, V. (ed.) The Bloomsbury companion to stylistics. London and New York: Bloomsbury, pp. 139156.Google Scholar
Mahrt, M., Weller, K. and Peters, I. (2013) ‘Twitter in scholarly communication’, in Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. (eds) Twitter and society. Peter Lang, New York, pp. 399410.Google Scholar
Markham, A. (2013) ‘Remix cultures, remix methods: Reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts’, in Denzin, N. K. and Giardina, M. D. (eds) Global dimensions of qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 6381.Google Scholar
Markham, A. and Buchanen, E. (2012) ‘Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0)’. Available at: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf (accessed 10 March 2017).Google Scholar
Martinec, R. and Salway, A. (2005) ‘A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media’, Visual Communication 4 (3), pp. 339374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, A. (2013) Status update. Celebrity, publicity and branding in the social media age. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marwick, A. and Boyd, D. (2011) ‘To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter’, Convergence 17 (2), pp. 139158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, A. and Ellison, N. (2012) ‘“There isn't Wifi in heaven!” Negotiating visibility on Facebook memorial pages’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 56 (3), pp. 378400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloud, S. (1993) Understanding comics. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
McCosker, A. (2014) ‘Trolling as provocation: YouTube's agonistic publics’, Convergence 20 (2), pp. 201217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCosker, A. (2015) ‘Social media activism at the Margins: Managing visibility, voice and vitality affects’, Social Media and Society 1 (2).Google Scholar
McEnery, T. and Baker, P. (2015) Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
McKerrell, S. (2015) ‘Social distance and the multimodal construction of the Other in sectarian song’, Social Semiotics 25 (5), pp. 614632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSweeney, M. (2016) Literacies of bilingual youth: A profile of bilingual, academic, social, and txt literacies. Unpublished PhD thesis, The Graduate Center at CUNY, New York.Google Scholar
Mildorf, J. and Thomas, B (2017) Dialogue across media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, N. (2015) ‘Goading as social action: non-polite evaluations in targeted banter’, in Terkourafi, M. (ed.) Interdisciplinary perspectives on impoliteness. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 121148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2005) ‘Television news and narrative: How relevant are narrative models for explaining the coherence of television news?’ in Thornborrow, J. and Coates, J. (eds) Sociolinguistics of narrative. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 239260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2007) The discourse of broadcast news: A linguistic approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, E. (2016) ‘Snapchat stories explained. Share snaps in a narrative style’. Available at: www.lifewire.com/what-is-a-snapchat-story-3486000 (accessed 28 March 2017).Google Scholar
Myers, G. (2010) The discourse of blogs and wikis. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Newton, C. (2016) ‘Instagram's new stories are a near-perfect copy of Snapchat stories’. Available at: www.theverge.com/2016/8/2/12348354/instagram-stories-announced-snapchat-kevin-systrom-interview (accessed 28 March 2017).Google Scholar
Norrick, N. (2000) Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. (2005) ‘Contextualizing and recontextualizing interlaced stories in conversation’, in Thornborrow, J. and Coates, J. (eds) The sociolinguistics of narrative. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 107128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. (2007) ‘Conversational storytelling’, in Herman, D. (ed.) The Cambridge companion to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. (2008) ‘Using large corpora of conversation to investigate narrative: the case of interjections in conversational storytelling performance’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13, pp. 438464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. and Jones, R. (2005) Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. and Capps, L. (2001) Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Onega, S. and Landa, J. A. G. (1996) Narratology: An introduction. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Page, R. (2003) ‘“Cherie: lawyer, wife, mum”: Contradictory patterns of representation in media reports of Cherie Booth/Blair’, Discourse and Society 14 (5): 559579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. (ed.) (2010) New perspectives on narrative and multimodality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, R. (2012a) Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, R. (2012b) ‘The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity: The role of hashtags’, Discourse and Communication 6 (2), pp. 181201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. (2013) ‘Seriality and storytelling in social media’, Storyworlds 5, pp. 3153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. and Thomas, B. (eds) (2011) New narratives: Stories and storytelling in the digital age. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R., Harper, R. and Frobenius, M. (2013) ‘From small stories to networked narrative’, Narrative Inquiry 23 (1), pp. 192213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. (2014) Affective publics: Sentiment, technology and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. and de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012) ‘Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt’, Journal of Communication 62 (2), pp. 266282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A. (2006) The linguistics of laughter: A corpus assisted study of laughter talk. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, C. (2011) ‘Emotion aside or emotional side? Crafting an “experience of involvement” in the news’, Journalism 12 (3), pp. 297316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W. (2011) ‘LOLing at tragedy: Facebook trolls, memorial pages and resistance to grief online’, First Monday 16 (12). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3168/3115 (accessed 28 March 2017).Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. (1985) Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Porter Abbott, H. (2002) The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Potts, A., Simm, W., Whittle, J. and Unger, J. (2014) ‘Exploring “success” in digitally augmented activism: A triangulated approach to analysing UK activist Twitter use’, Discourse, Context & Media 2 (1), pp. 6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puschmann, C. (2015) ‘The form and function of quoting in digital media: The case of retweets’, Discourse, Context & Media 7, pp. 2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, P. (2015) ‘Every little helps? YouTube, sousveillance and the “anti-Tesco” riot in Bristol’, New Media & Society 17 (5), pp. 755771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. and Langford, R. (2015) ‘A shifting collective identity: A critical discourse analysis of child care advocacy association of Canada's public messaging in 2005 and 2008’, Critical Discourse Studies 1, pp. 7896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. (2006) Analysing newspapers: An approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Rieder, B. (2013) ‘Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application’. WebSci '13 Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, May 2–4, Paris. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2464475 (accessed 11 September 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. L. (2004) Narrative across media: The languages of storytelling. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. L. (2007) ‘Toward a definition of narrative’, in Herman, D. (ed.) The Cambridge companion to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salway, A. and Herman, D. (2011) ‘Digitized corpora as theory-building resource: New methods for narrative inquiry’, in Page, R. and Thomas, B. (ed.) New narratives: Stories and storytelling in the digital age. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 120137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, J. and Cheong, P. H. (2010) ‘Tweeting prayers and communicating grief over Michael Jackson online’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (5), pp. 328340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (2002) Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (2008) Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemioticization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, K. (2015) ‘The pragmatics of hashtags: inference and conversational style on Twitter’, Journal of Pragmatics 81, pp. 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, C. (2009) ‘ContextMiner: Supporting the mining of contextual information for ephemeral digital video preservation’, International Journal of Digital Curation 4 (2), pp. 171183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuman, A. (2005) Other people's stories: Entitlement claims and the critique of empathy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (2004) Trust the text. Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (2017) ‘160 Amazing YouTube Statistics (February 2017)’. Available at: http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/youtube-statistics/ (accessed 28 March 2017).Google Scholar
Soukup, P. (2014) ‘Looking at, with, and through YouTube’, Communication Research Trends 33 (3), pp. 132.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002) ‘Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport-sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations’, Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5), pp. 529545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005) ‘(Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpacking their bases and interrelationships’, Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1), pp. 95119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007) ‘Theories of identity and the analysis of face’, Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4), pp. 639656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008) Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory, 2nd edition. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Stefanone, M., Lackaff, D. and Rosen, D. (2010) ‘The relationship between traditional mass media and “social media”: Reality television as a model for social network site behaviour’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 54 (3) pp. 508525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, L. (2013) ‘Policy and participation on social media: The cases of YouTube, Facebook and Wikipedia’, Communication, Culture and Critique 6, pp. 353371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenglin, M. (2004) Packaging curiosities: Towards a grammar of three-dimensional space. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Stever, G. S. and Lawson, K. (2013) ‘Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: Implications for the study of parasocial interaction’, North American Journal of Psychology 15 (2), pp. 339354.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (2011) ‘Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction’, in Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds) The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, E. and Edwards, D. (2007) ‘“Black this, black that”: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations’, Discourse & Society 18 (3), pp. 337372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P. and Chi, E. H. (2010) ‘Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network’. Social Computing IEEE Second International Conference, 2010, pp. 177184. Available at: http://www.parc.com/content/attachments/want-to-be-retweeted.pdf (accessed 27 March 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. A. and Denis, D. (2008) ‘Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and teen language’, American Speech 83 (1), pp. 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tann, K. (2010) Semogenesis of a nation: An iconography of Japanese identity. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A. and Creswell, J. (2007) ‘The new era of mixed methods’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1), pp. 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. (2012) ‘Screwed up, but working on it: Disordering the self through e-stories’, Narrative Inquiry 22 (1), pp. 86104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001) Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, M. (2009) Narrative progression in the short story. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, M. (2016) Making sense of narrative text: Situation, repetition and picturing in the reading of short stories. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, G. (2010) Ordinary people and the media: The demotic turn. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uygur-Distexhe, D. (2014) ‘Lol, mdr and ptdr: An inclusive and gradual approach to discourse markers’, in Cougnon, L., Fairon, C. and Crystal, D. (eds) SMS communication: A linguistic approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 239263.Google Scholar
Van Dijck, J. (2013) The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijck, J. and Nieborg, D. (2009) ‘Wikinomics and its discontents: A critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos’, New Media & Society 11 (5), pp. 855874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (1991) Racism and the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. (2009) Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (1991) ‘Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television’, Continuum 5 (1), pp. 76114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The representation of social actors’, in Caldas Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 3270.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008) Discourse and practice: New tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2012) ‘The critical analysis of musical discourse’, Critical Discourse Studies 9 (4), pp. 319328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zoonen, L., Vis, F. and Mihelj, S. (2010) ‘Performing citizenship on YouTube: Activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna’, Critical Discourse Studies 7, pp. 249262.Google Scholar
Vasquez, C. (2014) The discourse of online consumer reviews. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Viégas, F. (2007) ‘The visual side of Wikipedia’. HICSS '07 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii Conference on System Sciences. 3–6 January 2007. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1255492 (accessed 27 March 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker Rettberg, J. (2014) Seeing ourselves through technology: How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see ourselves. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, M. and El Zahed, S. (2011) ‘The Arab Spring: “I'll be waiting for you guys”: A YouTube call to action in the Egyptian revolution’, International Journal of Communication 5, pp. 13331343.Google Scholar
Wall, T. (2013) ‘The X Factor’, in Bennett, P. and McDougall, J. (eds) Mythologies today: Barthes reimagined. New York: Routledge, pp. 1923.Google Scholar
Way, L. C. S. (2016) ‘Protest music, populism, politics and authenticity’, Journal of Language and Politics 15 (4), pp. 422445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, L. (2013) ‘Facebook sharing: A sociolinguistic analysis of computer-mediated storytelling’, Discourse, Context & Media 2, pp. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, L. (2015) Responding (or not) on Facebook: A sociolinguistic study of Liking, Commenting, and other reactions to posts. Unpublished PhD thesis, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
West, L. and Trester, A. (2013) ‘Facework on Facebook: Conversations on social media’, in Tannen, D. and Trester, A. (eds) Discourse 2.0: Language and new media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 133153.Google Scholar
White, P. (1997) ‘Death, disruption and the moral order: The narrative impulse in mass-media hard news reporting’, in Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (eds) Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell, pp. 101133.Google Scholar
Wikipedia Contributors (2014a) ‘Wikipedia’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia&oldid=637722569 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar
Wikipedia Contributors (2014b) ‘Identifying reliable sources’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources&oldid=635915178 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar
Wikipedia Contributors (2014c) ‘Quotations’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Quotations&oldid=638008390 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar
Wikipedia Contributors (2015a) ‘Neutral point of view’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view&oldid=714753741 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar
Wikipedia Contributors (2015b) ‘Wikipedia conduct policies’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_conduct_policies&oldid=676241977 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar
Wikipedia Contributors (2017a) ‘Talk: Murder of Meredith Kercher’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher&oldid=751912364 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar
Wikipedia Contributors (2017b) ‘Verifiability’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Verifiability&oldid=798245920 (accessed 15 September 2017).Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2007) ‘Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry’, Pragmatics & Cognition 15 (1), pp. 203225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, M. and Baughman, L. (2012) ‘Glee fandom and Twitter: Something new, or more of the same old thing?’ Communication Studies 63 (3), pp. 328344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. (2017) ‘Discursive strategies of resistance in Weibo – A case study of Tianjin explosions in Sina Weibo in China’. The Ross Priory Broadcast Talk Seminar Group. University of Strathclyde, 3–6 July 2017.Google Scholar
Yasseri, T., Sumi, R., Rung, A., Kornai, A. and Kertesz, J. (2012) ‘Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia’, PLoS ONE 7 (6). Available at: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0038869 (accessed 27 March 2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zappavigna, M. (2011) ‘Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter’, New Media & Society 13 (5), pp. 788806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M. (2014a) ‘Coffeetweets: Bonding around the bean on Twitter’, in Seargeant, P. and Tagg, C. (eds) The language of social media: Communication and community on the Internet. London: Palgrave, pp. 139160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M. (2014b) ‘Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation’, Discourse and Communication 8 (2), pp. 209228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M. (2015) ‘Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags’, Social Semiotics 25, pp. 274291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M. (2016) ‘Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images’, Visual Communication 15 (3), pp. 271292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, M. and Zhao, S. (2017) ‘The selfie as a genre of visual self-representation’, Discourse, Context & Media. In production.Google Scholar