Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:45:53.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Wildlife reintroductions: The conceptual development and application of theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Olin E. Rhodes Jr.
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Emily K. Latch
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
J. Andrew DeWoody
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
John W. Bickham
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Charles H. Michler
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Krista M. Nichols
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Gene E. Rhodes
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Keith E. Woeste
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Throughout the latter part of the nineteenth century and early portion of the twentieth century, there were widespread declines in wildlife species in North America due to unregulated harvest for commercial, regulatory, and private uses as well as dramatic changes in land-use practices (Moulton & Sanderson 1999). Despite recognition of the grave situation facing many of the most popular and common wildlife species, resulting in the initiation of continent-wide conservation and management programs for both game and nongame species, many of these species were critically imperiled by the time such programs were initiated (Mackie 2000). The history of wildlife management and conservation programs in the United States is intrinsically tied to this point in time, in that many of the practices and values that are in existence today stem from the recognition that wildlife resources are not inexhaustible and that active management and protection efforts must be implemented to offset the negative impacts that our species exerts on natural resources.

One of the most effective and widely used tools employed by wildlife management and conservation organizations to recover and redistribute wildlife species within suitable habitats is the practice of species translocation (International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN] 1987). Indeed, species-translocation programs targeted at reintroducing or introducing wildlife species to areas of suitable or reclaimed habitat were used extensively in attempts to recover decimated species across North America beginning in the early portion of the twentieth century (Griffith et al. 1989; Fischer & Lindenmayer 2000). Early in the development of these translocation programs, most emphasis was placed on elucidating the ecology of species targeted for recovery; locating potential source populations from which to draw individuals for translocation; identifying areas of habitat suitable for population establishment; and developing viable capture, handling, and veterinary protocols for species targeted for translocation (IUCN 1998). As the logistical considerations of translocation have been optimized for growing numbers of species, the utilization of this tool has grown to encompass not only species recovery and reintroduction programs but also numerous additional applications, including population supplementation, population expansion, and nuisance-animal management (Griffith et al. 1989; Linnell et al. 1997).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allendorf, FW (1986) Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biology, 5, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, AJ, Moeed, A (1987) Rapid genetic differentiation and founder effect in colonizing populations of common mynah (Acridotheres tristis). Evolution, 41, 525–538.Google Scholar
Ballou, JD, Lacy, RC (1995) Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic diversity in pedigreed populations. In: Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation (eds. Ballou, JD, Gilpin, M, Foose, TJ), pp. 76–111. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bonnell, ML, Selander, RK (1974) Elephant seals: genetic variation and near extinction. Science, 184, 908–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzat, JL, Johnson, JA, Toepfer, JE et al. (2009) Beyond the beneficial effects of translocations as an effective tool for the genetic restoration of isolated populations. Conservation Genetics, 10, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, PW, Morris, PA (1994) Animal translocation for conservation: performances of dormice in relation to release method, origin, and season. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 699–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broders, HG, Mahoney, SP, Montevecchi, WA, Davidson, WS (1999) Population genetic structure and the effect of founder events on the genetic variability of moose, Alces alces, in Canada. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1309–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, A (1994) Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity, 73, 657–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carbyn, LN, Armbruster, HJ, Mamo, C (1994) The swift fox reintroduction program in Canada from 1983 to 1992. In: Restoration of Endangered Species: Conceptual Issues, Planning, and Implementation (eds. Bowles, ML, Whelan, CJ), pp. 247–269. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, M, Eldridge, MDB, Oakwood, M et al. (2009) Effects of founder events on the genetic variation of translocated island populations: implications for conservation management of the northern quoll. Conservation Genetics, 10, 1719–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, JF, Kimura, M (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Davis, MH (1983) Post-release movements of introduced marten. Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, RW, Demarais, S, Honeycutt, RL et al. (2003) Genetic consequences of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) restoration in Mississippi. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3237–3252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drauch, AM, Fisher, BE, Latch, EK, Fike, JA, Rhodes, OE (2008) Evaluation of a remnant lake sturgeon population's utility as a source for reintroductions in the Ohio River system. Conservation Genetics, 9, 1195–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drauch, AM, Rhodes, OE (2007) Genetic evaluation of the lake sturgeon reintroduction program in the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 27, 434–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldridge, WH, Killebrew, K (2008) Genetic diversity over multiple generations of supplementation: an example from Chinook salmon using microsatellite and demographic data. Conservation Genetics, 9, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewens, WJ (1982) On the concept of effective population size. Theoretical Population Biology, 21, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, SR, Nager, RG, Nicoll, MAC et al. (2008) Inbreeding and loss of genetic variation in a reintroduced population of Mauritius kestrel. Conservation Biology, 22, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, J, Lindenmayer, DB (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation, 96, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimmons, NN, Buskirk, SW, Smith, MH (1997) Genetic changes in reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep populations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 863–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, SH, Boyd, DK (1997) Genetic structure and migration in native and reintroduced Rocky Mountain wolf populations. Conservation Biology, 11, 1226–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, ME, Soule, ME (1986) Minimum viable populations: the processes of species extinction. In: Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity (ed. Soule, ME), pp. 13–34. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
Gompper, ME, Stacey, PB, Berger, J (1997) Conservation implications of the natural loss of lineages in wild mammals and birds. Conservation Biology, 11, 857–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, GC, Kim, YJ, Yang, SY (1978) The genetics of colonization: loss of variability among introduced populations of Anolis lizards (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae). Journal of Herpetology, 12, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, B, Scott, JM, Carpenter, JW, Reed, C (1989) Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science, 245, 477–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haig, SM, Ballou, JD, Derrickson, SR (1990) Management options for preserving genetic diversity: reintroduction of Guam rails to the wild. Conservation Biology, 4, 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, SM, Belthoff, JR, Allen, DH (1993) Population viability analysis for a small population of red-cockaded woodpeckers and an evaluation of enhancement strategies. Conservation Biology, 7, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, PW, Gutierrez-Espeleta, GA, Lee, RN (2001) Founder effect in an island population of bighorn sheep. Molecular Ecology, 10, 851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, PW, Lacy, RC, Allendorf, FW, Soule, ME (1996) Directions in conservation biology: comments on Caughley. Conservation Biology, 10, 1312–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, PW, Miller, PS (1992) Conservation genetics: techniques and fundamentals. Ecological Applications, 2, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, JF, Rachlow, JL, Rhodes, OE, Williams, CL, Waits, LP (2007) Reintroduction and genetic structure: Rocky Mountain elk in Yellowstone and the western states. Journal of Mammalogy, 88, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlden, BA, England, PR, Taylor, AC, Greville, WD, Sherwin, WB (1996) Low genetic variability of the koala Phascolarctos cinereus in south-eastern Australia following a severe population bottleneck. Molecular Ecology, 5, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (1987) Translocation of living organisms: introductions, reintroductions, and restocking. IUCN Position Statement, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (1998) Guidelines for Re-introductions. Prepared by the IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Jamieson, IG, Tracy, LN, Fletcher, D, Armstrong, DP (2007) Moderate inbreeding depression in a reintroduced population of North Island robins. Animal Conservation, 10, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiman, DG, Beck, B, Dietz, JM, Dietz, A (1991) Costs of a reintroduction and criteria for success: accounting and accountability in the golden lion tamarin conservation program. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 62, 125–142.Google Scholar
Lacy, RC (1987) Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conservation Biology, 1, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, RC (1994) Managing genetic diversity in captive populations of animals. In: Restoration and Recovery of Endangered Plants and Animals (eds. Bowles, ML, Whelan, CJ), pp. 63–89. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lacy, RC (2000) Considering threats to the viability of small populations using individual-based models. Ecological Bulletins, 48, 39–51.Google Scholar
Lambert, DM, King, T, Shepherd, LD et al. (2005) Serial population bottlenecks and genetic variation: translocated populations of the New Zealand saddleback (Philesturnus carunculatus rufusater). Conservation Genetics, 6, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, S, Jameson, R, Bodkin, J, Staedler, M, Bentzen, P (2002) Microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in remnant and translocated sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations. Journal of Mammalogy, 83, 893–906.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latch, EK, Applegate, RD, Rhodes, OE (2006a) Genetic composition of wild turkeys in Kansas following decades of translocations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 1698–1703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latch, EK, Harveson, LA, King, JS, Hobson, MD, Rhodes, OE (2006b) Assessing hybridization in wildlife populations using molecular markers: a case study in wild turkeys. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latch, EK, Rhodes, OE (2005) The effects of gene flow and population isolation on the genetic structure of reintroduced wild turkey populations: are genetic signatures of source populations retained?Conservation Genetics, 6, 981–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latch, EK, Rhodes, OE (2006) Evidence for seasonal variation in local genetic structure in the wild turkey. Animal Conservation, 9, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leberg, PL (1991) Effects of bottlenecks on genetic divergence in populations of the wild turkey. Conservation Biology, 5, 522–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leberg, PL (1992) Effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity as measured by allozymes electrophoresis. Evolution, 46, 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leberg, PL, Ellsworth, DL (1999) Further evaluation of the genetic consequences of translocations on southeastern whitetailed deer populations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leberg, PL, Firman, BD (2008) Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programs. Molecular Ecology, 17, 334–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leberg, PL, Stangel, PW, Hillestad, HO, Marchinton, RL, Smith, MH (1994) Genetic structure of reintroduced wild turkey and white-tailed deer populations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 58, 698–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeGouar, P, Rigal, F, Boisselier-Dubayle, MC et al. (2008) Genetic variation in a network of natural and reintroduced populations of Griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) in Europe. Conservation Genetics, 9, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letty, J, Marchandeau, S, Clobert, J, Aubineau, J (2000) Improving translocation success: an experimental study of anti-stress treatment and release method for wild rabbits. Animal Conservation, 3, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnell, JDC, Aanes, R, Swenson, JE, Odden, J, Smith, ME (1997) Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review. Biodiversity Conservation, 6, 1245–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luikhart, G, Allendorf, FW, Cornuet, JM, Sherwin, WB (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. Journal of Heredity, 89, 238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, RJ (2000) History of management of large mammals in North America. In: Ecology and Management of Large Mammals in North America (eds. Demarais, S, Krausman, PR), pp. 292–320. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Maehr, DS, Noss, RF, Larkin, JL (2001) Large Mammal Restoration: Ecological and Sociological Challenges in the 21st Century. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Maudet, C, Miller, C, Bassano, B et al. (2002) Microsatellite DNA and recent statistical methods in wildlife conservation management: applications in Alpine ibex (Capra ibex [ibex]). Molecular Ecology, 11, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, RA, Geist, V, Johnston, RH (1986) Cardiac responses of bighorn sheep to trapping and radio instrumentation. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64, 1197–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merila, J, Bjorklund, M, Baker, AJ (1996) The successful founder: genetics of introduced Carduelis chloris (greenfinch) populations in New Zealand. Heredity, 77, 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B, Ralls, K, Reading, RP, Scott, JM, Estes, J (1999) Biological and technical considerations of carnivore translocation: a review. Animal Conservation, 2, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, LS, Smouse, PE (1994) Demographic consequences of inbreeding in remnant populations. The American Naturalist, 144, 412–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minckley, WL (1995) Translocation as a tool for conserving imperiled fishes: experiences in western United States. Biological Conservation, 72, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mock, KE, Latch, EK, Rhodes, OE (2004) Assessing losses of genetic diversity due to translocation: long-term case histories in Merriam's turkey (Meleagris gallopavo merriami). Conservation Genetics, 5, 631–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, ML (2002) Wildlife Restoration: Techniques for Habitat Analysis and Animal Monitoring. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Moulton, MP, Sanderson, J (1999) Wildlife Issues in a Changing World, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Nei, M, Maruyama, T, Chakraborty, R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olech, W, Perzanowski, K (2002) A genetic background for reintroduction program of the European bison (Bison bonasus) in the Carpathians. Biological Conservation, 108, 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, T, Albornoz, J, Nores, C, Dominguez, A (1998) Evaluation of genetic variability in introduced populations of red deer (Cervus elaphus) using DNA fingerprinting. Hereditas, 129, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polans, NO, Allard, RW (1989) An experimental evaluation of the recovery potential of ryegrass populations from genetic stress resulting from restriction of population size. Evolution, 43, 1320–1324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polziehn, RO, Hamr, J, Mallory, FF, Strobeck, C (2000) Microsatellite analysis of North American wapiti (Cervus elaphus) populations. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1561–1576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prakash, S (1972) Origin of reproductive isolation in the absence of apparent genic differentiation in a geographic isolate of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 72, 143–155.Google Scholar
Prakash, S, Lewontin, RC, Hubby, JL (1969) A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. IV. Patterns of genic variation in central, marginal, and isolated populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 61, 841–858.Google Scholar
Rhodes, OE, Buford, DJ, Miller, M, Lutz, RS (1995) Genetic structure of reintroduced Rio Grande turkeys in Kansas. Journal of Wildlife Management, 59, 771–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, OE, Reat, EP, Heffelfinger, JR, Vos, JC (2001) Analysis of reintroduced pronghorn populations in Arizona using mitochondrial DNA markers. Proceedings of the 19th Biennial Pronghorn Antelope Workshop, 19, 45–54.Google Scholar
Robert, A, Sarrazin, F, Couvet, D (2004a) Influence of the rate of introduction on the fitness of restored populations. Conservation Genetics, 5, 673–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, A, Sarrazin, F, Couvet, D, Legendre, S (2004b) Releasing adults versus young in reintroductions: interactions between demography and genetics. Conservation Biology, 18, 1078–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, GT, Beebee, JC, Burke, T (1998) Phylogeography of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita in Britain: genetic differentiation of native and translocated populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 751–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saccheri, I, Kuussaari, M, Kankare, M et al. (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature, 392, 491–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarrazin, F, Barbault, R (1996) Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 474–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scribner, KT, Stuwe, M (1994) Genetic relationships among alpine ibex Capra ibex populations re-established from a common ancestral source. Biological Conservation, 69, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, RK, Kaufman, DW (1973) Self-fertilization and genetic population structure in a colonizing land snail. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 70, 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serfass, TL, Brooks, RP, Novak, JM, Johns, PE, Rhodes, OE (1998) Genetic variation among populations of river otters in North America: considerations for reintroduction projects. Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 736–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigg, DP, Goldizen, AW, Pople, AR (2005) The importance of mating system in translocation programs: reproductive success of released male bridled nailtail wallabies. Biological Conservation, 123, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, CL, Whittaker, DG, Gillis, D, Cox, LL, Rhodes, OE (2005) Genetic consequences of reintroductions: an example from Oregon pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra americana). Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 1463–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, CA, Mulvey, M, Vinyard, GL (1996) Translocations and the preservation of allelic diversity. Conservation Biology, 10, 1133–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storfer, A (1999) Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biological Conservation, 87, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugg, DW, Chesser, RK, Dobson, FS, Hogland, JL (1996) Population genetics meets behavioral ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 338–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, CE, Gorman, GC (1975) Population genetics of a “colonizing” lizard: natural selection for allozyme morphs in Anolis grahami. Heredity, 35, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, JW, Toweill, DE (1982) Elk of North America: Ecology and Management. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, PA.Google Scholar
Thorne, ET, Williams, ES (1988) Disease and endangered species: the black-footed ferret as a recent example. Conservation Biology, 2, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tordoff, HB, Redig, PT (2001) Role of genetic background in the success of reintroduced peregrine falcons. Conservation Biology, 15, 528–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuberville, TD, Clark, EE, Buhlmann, KA, Gibbons, JW (2005) Translocation as a conservation tool: site fidelity and movement of repatriated gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus). Animal Conservation, 8, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernesi, C, Crestanello, B, Pecchioli, E et al. (2003) The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): a microsatellite analysis. Molecular Ecology, 12, 585–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vonholdt, BM, Stahler, DR, Smith, DW et al. (2008) The genealogy and genetic viability of reintroduced Yellowstone grey wolves. Molecular Ecology, 17, 252–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weckwerth, RP, Wright, PL (1968) Results of transplanting fishers in Montana. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 32, 977–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, CL, Lundrigan, B, Rhodes, OE (2003) Analysis of microsatellite variation in tule elk. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, CL, Serfass, TL, Cogan, R, Rhodes, OE (2002) Microsatellite variation in the reintroduced Pennsylvania elk herd. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1299–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, RN, Rhodes, OE, Serfass, TL (2000) Assessment of genetic variance among source and reintroduced fisher populations. Journal of Mammalogy, 81, 895–907.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisely, SM, Santymire, RM, Livieri, TM, Mueting, SA, Howard, J (2008) Genotypic and phenotypic consequences of reintroduction history in the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes). Conservation Genetics, 9, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witzenberger, KA, Hochkirch, A (2008) Genetic consequences of animal translocations: a case study using the field cricket, Gryllus campestris L. Biological Conservation, 141, 3059–3068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, CM, Griffith, B, Reed, C, Temple, SA (1996) Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conservation Biology, 10, 1142–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×