Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-pmhlf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-12T15:19:15.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Implications of landscape alteration for the conservation of genetic diversity of endangered species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Paul L. Leberg
University of Louisiana
Giridhar N. R. Athrey
University of Louisiana
Kelly R. Barr
University of Louisiana
Denise L. Lindsay
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center
Richard F. Lance
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center
J. Andrew DeWoody
Purdue University, Indiana
John W. Bickham
Purdue University, Indiana
Charles H. Michler
Purdue University, Indiana
Krista M. Nichols
Purdue University, Indiana
Gene E. Rhodes
Purdue University, Indiana
Keith E. Woeste
Purdue University, Indiana
Get access


Humans have dramatically altered biotic communities around the world. During the process of converting forests, grasslands, and wetlands for agriculture, urban development, and transportation, the remnants of natural habitat have become increasingly fragmented. This fragmentation of habitat has many biological consequences. Foremost is the reduction of available habitat resulting in a reduced size of populations of species dependent on natural land covers (Andren 1994; Fahrig 1997, 2003). Fragmentation, though, is more than just habitat loss; it is also the division of remaining habitat into patches that experience at least partial isolation from other such fragments (Fahrig 2003). Fragmentation increases habitat edges and, consequently, the exposure of populations to the resulting alterations in microclimate and biota associated with edge environments (Suarez et al. 1998; Fagan et al. 1999). As fragments become more isolated, the frequency of movements between fragments is reduced. Furthermore, when localized extinctions in isolated fragments occur, immigration from neighboring fragments can be insufficient to allow recolonization (Tilman et al. 1994; Fahrig 2003). Extinctions associated with demographic stochasticity are expected to be more common in small fragments than in more continuous habitat tracts (Griffen & Drake 2008).

The consequences of fragmentation have the potential to influence genetic diversity in species requiring continuous tracts of habitat (see Chapter 8 by J. Hamrick). Localized population declines cause allele frequencies to drift; moreover, widespread population declines due to fragmentation across the range of a species may reduce its effective population size (Pannell & Charlesworth 2000; Alo & Turner 2005). With declines of census and effective population size, inhabitants of isolated fragments begin to resemble independent populations, become more vulnerable to stochastic processes, lose genetic diversity, and increase in relatedness (Barrowclough 1980; Leberg 2005).

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alo, D, Turner, TF (2005) Effects of habitat fragmentation on effective population size in the endangered Rio Grande silvery minnow. Conservation Biology, 19, 1138–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amos, W, Balmford, A (2001) When does conservation genetics matter?Heredity, 87, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andren, H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat – a review. Oikos, 71, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arguedas, N, Parker, PG (2000) Seasonal migration and genetic population structure in house wrens. The Condor, 102, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avise, JC (1992) Molecular population-structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna – A case-history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos, 63, 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balloux, F, Lugon-Moulin, N (2002) The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology, 11, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, KR, Dharmarajan, G, Rhodes, OE Jr, Lance, R, Leberg, PL (2007) Novel microsatellite loci for the study of the black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla). Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 1067–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, KR, Lindsay, DL, Athrey, G et al. (2008) Population structure in an endangered songbird: maintenance of genetic differentiation despite high vagility and significant population recovery. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3628–3639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrowclough, GF (1980) Gene flow, effective population sizes, and genetic variance-components in birds. Evolution, 34, 789–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, O, Tocher, MD, Sarre, SD (2004) Can assignment tests measure dispersal?Molecular Ecology, 13, 551–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohonak, AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Quarterly Review of Biology, 74, 21–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, KP, Anderson, DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information theoretic approach, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Cale, PG (2003) The influence of social behaviour, dispersal and landscape fragmentation on population structure in a sedentary bird. Biological Conservation, 109, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, SM, Kelly, JF, Kimura, M, Smith, TB (2003) Combining genetic markers and stable isotopes to reveal population connectivity and migration patterns in a neotropical migrant, Wilson's warbler (Wilsonia pusilla). Molecular Ecology, 12, 819–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornuet, JM, Luikart, G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics, 144, 2001–2014.Google ScholarPubMed
Crochet, PA (2000) Genetic structure of avian populations – allozymes revisited. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1463–1469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, JF, Denniston, C (1988) Inbreeding and variance effective population numbers. Evolution, 42, 482–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, JF, Kimura, M (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Eon, R, Glenn, SM, Parfitt, I, Fortin, MJ (2002) Landscape connectivity as a function of scale and organism vagility in a real forested landscape. Conservation Ecology, 6. [online] URL:
Dallas, JF, Marshall, F, Piertney, SB, Bacon, PJ, Racey, PA (2002) Spatially restricted gene flow and reduced microsatellite polymorphism in the Eurasian otter Lutra lutra in Britain. Conservation Genetics, 3, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelis, DL, Waterhouse, JC (1987) Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecological Monographs, 57, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desrochers, A, Hannon, SJ (1997) Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conservation Biology, 11, 1204–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiBattista, JD (2008) Patterns of genetic variation in anthropogenically impacted populations. Conservation Genetics, 9, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doak, P (2000) Population consequences of restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat. Ecology, 81, 1828–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, WF, Cantrell, RS, Cosner, C (1999) How habitat edges change species interactions. The American Naturalist, 153, 165–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahrig, L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 603–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrig, L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 34, 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, VW, Miles, DB, White, MM (2004) Genetic differentiation in the endangered black-capped vireo. Condor, 106, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conservation Biology, 10, 1500–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R (1997) Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations?Heredity, 78, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankham, R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biological Conservation, 126, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, DJ, Lippe, C, Bernatchez, L (2004) Consequences of unequal population size, asymmetric gene flow and sex-biased dispersal on population structure in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis). Molecular Ecology, 13, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhlendorf, SD, Engle, DM (2001) Restoring heterogeneity on rangelands: ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. Bioscience, 51, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhlendorf, SD, Engle, DM (2004) Application of the fire-grazing interaction to restore a shifting mosaic on tallgrass prairie. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 604–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhlendorf, SD, Smeins, FE (1997) Long-term vegetation dynamics mediated by herbivores, weather and fire in a Juniperus-Quercus savanna. Journal of Vegetation Science, 8, 819–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, HL, Dawson, RJG, Hobson, KA (2000) Limited differentiation in microsatellite DNA variation among northern populations of the yellow warbler: evidence for male-biased gene flow?Molecular Ecology, 9, 2137–2147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graber, JW (1961) Distribution, habitat requirements and life history of the black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla). Ecological Monographs, 31, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grapputo, A, Boman, S, Lindstrom, L, Lyytinen, A, Mappes, J (2005) The voyage of an invasive species across continents: genetic diversity of North American and European Colorado potato beetle populations. Molecular Ecology, 14, 4207–4219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffen, BD, Drake, JM (2008) Effects of habitat quality and size on extinction in experimental populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2251–2256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grzybowski, J (1991) Black-capped Vireo (Vireo atricapillus) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Grzybowski, J (1995) Black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapillus). In: Birds of North America (eds. Poole, A, Gill, F). The American Ornithologist's Union, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gu, WD, Heikkila, R, Hanski, I (2002) Estimating the consequences of habitat fragmentation on extinction risk in dynamic landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 17, 699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, B, Bensch, S, Hasselquist, D, Nielsen, B (2002) Restricted dispersal in a long-distance migrant bird with patchy distribution, the great reed warbler. Oecologia, 130, 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, RJ, Reid, JM (2002) Behavioral barriers to non-migratory movements of birds. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 39, 275–290.Google Scholar
Hunter, WC, Buehler, DA, Canterbury, RA, Confer, JL, Hamel, PB (2002) Conservation of disturbance-dependent birds in eastern North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 440–455.Google Scholar
Hutchison, DW, Templeton, AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution, 53, 1898–1914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, M, Primmer, CR, Merila, J (2007) Does habitat fragmentation reduce fitness and adaptability? A case study of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Molecular Ecology, 16, 2693–2700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, J, Stoll, P, Rusterholz, HP et al. (2006) Small-scale experimental habitat fragmentation reduces colonization rates in species-rich grasslands. Oecologia, 148, 144–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawamura, K, Kubota, M, Furukawa, M, Harada, Y (2007) The genetic structure of endangered indigenous populations of the amago salmon, Oncorhynchus masou ishikawae, in Japan. Conservation Genetics, 8, 1163–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keitt, TH (1997) Stability and complexity on a lattice: coexistence of species in an individual-based food web model. Ecological Modelling, 102, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyghobadi, N, Unger, K, Weintraub, JD, Fonseca, DM (2006) Remnant populations of the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) in Pennsylvania: local genetic structure in a high gene flow species. Conservation Genetics, 7, 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, I, Yamamoto, S, Maekawa, K (2006) Decomposed pairwise regression analysis of genetic and geographic distance reveals a metapopulation structure of stream-dwelling Dolly Varden charr. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3175–3189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, AT, Ison, JL, Ashley, MV, Howe, HF (2008) The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conservation Biology, 22, 878–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, JC (1980) Habitat requirements of the golden-cheeked warbler: management implications. Journal of Range Management, 33, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, C, Gass, L (1999) Dendroica chrysoparia golden-cheeked warbler. Birds of North America, 420, 1–24.Google Scholar
Leberg, PL (1991) Influence of fragmentation and bottlenecks on genetic-divergence of wild turkey populations. Conservation Biology, 5, 522–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leberg, PL (1992) Effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity as measured by allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution, 46, 477–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leberg, PL (2002) Estimating allelic richness: effects of sample size and bottlenecks. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2445–2451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leberg, PL (2005) Genetic approaches for estimating the effective size of populations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 1385–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, PLM, Luschi, P, Hays, GC (2007) Detecting female precise natal philopatry in green turtles using assignment methods. Molecular Ecology, 16, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsay, DL, Barr, KR, Lance, RF et al. (2008) Habitat fragmentation and genetic diversity of an endangered, migratory songbird, the golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia). Molecular Ecology, 17, 2122–2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louy, D, Habel, JC, Schmitt, T et al. (2007) Strongly diverging population genetic patterns of three skipper species: the role of habitat fragmentation and dispersal ability. Conservation Genetics, 8, 671–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manel, S, Schwartz, MK, Luikart, G, Taberlet, P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, S, Hunt, DH, Gomez, A (2007) Global isolation by distance despite strong regional phylogeography in a small metazoan. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, DH (1989) American Warblers: An Ecological and Behavioral Perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M, Maruyama, T, Chakraborty, R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution, 29, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olivieri, GL, Sousa, V, Chikhi, L, Radespiel, U (2008) From genetic diversity and structure to conservation: genetic signature of recent population declines in three mouse lemur species (Microcebus spp.). Biological Conservation, 141, 1257–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyler, S, Leberg, PL (2005) Conservation genetics in wildlife biology. In: Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife Investigations and Management (ed. Braun, C), pp. 632–657. Wildlife Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Packer, L, Taylor, JS, Savignano, DA et al. (1998) Population biology of an endangered butterfly, Lycaeides melissa samuelis (Lepidoptera; Lycaenidae): genetic variation, gene flow, and taxonomic status. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 76, 320–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pannell, JR, Charlesworth, B (2000) Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences, 355, 1851–1864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitra, C, D'Aloia M-A, , Lieckfeldt, D, Combreau, O (2004) Genetic variation across the current range of the Asian houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulate macqueenii). Conservation Genetics, 5, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappole, JH, King, DI, Diez, J (2003) Winter- vs. breeding-habitat limitation for an endangered avian migrant. Ecological Applications, 13, 735–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, SM, Wilson, CC, Mandrak, NE, Carl, LM (2008) Population structure and genetic diversity of black redhorse (Moxostoma duquesnei) in a highly fragmented watershed. Conservation Genetics, 9, 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, NM, Butlin, RK, Altringham, JD (2005) Genetic population structure of Natterer's bats explained by mating at swarming sites and philopatry. Molecular Ecology, 14, 4299–4312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousset, F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics, 145, 1219–1228.Google ScholarPubMed
Sacks, BN, Ernest, HB, Boydston, EE (2006) San Francisco's golden gate: a bridge between historically distinct coyote (Canis latrans) populations?Western North American Naturalist, 66, 263–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segelbacher, G, Höglund, J, Storch, I (2003) From connectivity to isolation: genetic consequences of population fragmentation in capercaillie across Europe. Molecular Ecology, 12, 1773–1780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segelbacher, G, Manel, S, Tomiuk, J (2008) Temporal and spatial analyses disclose consequences of habitat fragmentation on the genetic diversity in capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus). Molecular Ecology, 17, 2356–2367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, DB, Kuhns, AR, Dreslik, MJ, Phillips, CA (2008) Roads as barriers to animal movement in fragmented landscapes. Animal Conservation, 11, 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, CC, Neigel, JE, Leberg, PL (2000) Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1517–1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streiff, R, Audiot, P, Foucart, A, Lecoq, M, Rasplus, JY (2005) Genetic survey of two endangered grasshopper subspecies, Prionotropis hystrix rhodanica and Prionotropis hystrix azami (Orthoptera, Pampagidae): within- and between-population dynamics at the regional scale. Conservation Genetics, 7, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, AV, Bolger, DT, Case, TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal southern California. Ecology, 79, 2041–2056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, A, Shaw, K, Routman, E, Davis, SK (1990) The genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 77, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) (1995) Golden-cheeked warbler. PWD BK W7000–013.
Thomas, CD (2000) Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-Series B: Biological Sciences, 267, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilman, D, May, RM, Lehman, CL, Nowak, MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 65–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uimaniemi, L, Orell, M, Kvist, L, Jokimäki, J, Lumme, J (2003) Genetic variation of the Siberian tit Parus cinctus populations at the regional level: a mitochondrial sequence analysis. Ecography, 26, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uimaniemi, L, Orell, M, Mönkkönen, M, Huhta, E, Jokimäki, J, Lumme, J (2000) Genetic diversity in the Siberian jay Perisoreus infaustus in fragmented old-growth forests of Fennoscandia. Ecography, 23, 669–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1992) Golden-cheeked Warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) Recovery Plan (ed. Keddy-Hector, DF), p. 97. USFWS, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
USFWS (1996) Golden-cheeked warbler population and habitat viability assessment report.
USFWS (2004) Biological Opinion, Consultation Number 2-12-05-F-021.
USFWS (2005) Biological Opinion, Consultation Number 2-15-2004-F-0266.
Van Rossum, F, De Sousa, SC, Triest, L (2004) Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in an agricultural landscape on the common Primula veris, and comparison with its rare congener, P. vulgaris. Conservation Genetics, 5, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, ML, Robertson, RJ, Hamel, PB, Friesen, VL (2005) Population genetic structure and dispersal across a fragmented landscape in cerulean warblers (Dendroica cerulea). Conservation Genetics, 6, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, R, Diamond, D, Shaw, D (1990) The golden-cheeked warbler: a status review. Final report submitted to Office of Endangered Species. USFWS, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Waples, RS (1998) Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. Journal of Heredity, 89, 438–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waples, RS, Gaggiotti, O (2006) What is a population? An empirical study of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, D, Greis, J (2002) Southern Forest Resource Assessment. USDA Forest Service.
Waser, PM, Busch, JD, McCormick, CR, DeWoody, JA (2006) Parentage analysis detects cryptic precapture dispersal in a philopatric rodent. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1929–1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, DM (2003) Long-term consequences of habitat fragmentation – highland birds in Oaxaca, Mexico. Biological Conservation, 111, 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, N, Powell, RA, Conkey, A, Snelgrove, AG (2006) Population status and threat analysis for the black-capped vireo. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 2, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Wimberly, MC (2006) Species dynamics in disturbed landscapes: when does a shifting habitat mosaic enhance connectivity?Landscape Ecology, 21, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Wright, S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, 28, 114–138.Google ScholarPubMed
Wright, S (1968) The theory of gene frequencies. In: Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, p. 511. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Young, A, Boyle, T, Brown, T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 413–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhan, XJ, Zhang, ZJ, Wu, H et al. (2007) Molecular analysis of dispersal in giant pandas. Molecular Ecology, 16, 3792–3800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats