Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-5rkl9 Total loading time: 0.716 Render date: 2022-12-04T01:51:24.421Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2010

Carlota S. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Modes of Discourse
The Local Structure of Texts
, pp. 294 - 313
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abusch, Dorit, 1997. Sequence of tense & temporal de re. Linguistics & Philosophy 20: 1–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acker, Liane, & Bruce Porter, 1994. Extracting viewpoints from knowledge bases. Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, Calif.: 547–52
Allen, James, 1983. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 26 (11): 832–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, James, & Raymond, C. Perrault, 1980. Analyzing intentions in utterances. Computational Linguistics, 15: 143–78Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira, 1989. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24: 65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira, 1990. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge
Arnold, Jennifer, Thomas, Wasow, Anthony, Losonoco, & Ryan, Ginstrom, 2000. Heaviness vs newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76: 28–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Asher, Nicholas, & Alex, Lascarides, 1993. Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics & Philosophy 16: 437–94Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, & Alex Lascarides, 1998a. Bridging. Journal of Semantics 15: 83–113CrossRef
Asher, Nicholas, & Alex Lascarides, 1998b. The semantics and pragmatics of Presupposition. Journal of Semantics 15: 239–99
Bach, Emmon, 1981. On time, tense, and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press
Bach, Kent, 1999. The semantics–pragmatics distinction: What it is and why it matters. In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics–Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 65–84
Bain, Alexander, 1877. English Composition and Rhetoric. London: Longmans
Baker, Carl Lee, 1995. Contrast, discourse prominence, and identification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 71: 63–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark, 1988. Incorporation. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press
Bal, Mieke, 1991. On Story-telling. Sonoma, Calif.: Polebridge Press
Banfield, Ann, 1982. Unspeakable Sentences. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul
Barker, Chris, 2000. Definite possessives and discourse novelty. Theoretical Linguistics 26: 211–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, R., 1976. Topik-Fokus-Struktur und Kategoriale Syntax. In V. Ehrich & P. Find (eds.), Grammatik und Pragmatik. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag
Bechtel, William, & Arthur Abrahamsen, 1991. Connectionism and the Mind: An Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell
Beekman, John, 1970. Propositions and theory relations within a discourse. Notes on Translation 37: 6–23Google Scholar
Benson, James, & William Greaves, 1992. Collocation and field of discourse. In W. Mann & S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Bever, Thomas, 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language. New York: John Wiley
Biber, Douglas, 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Biber, Douglas, 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43CrossRef
Biber, Douglas, & Edward, Finegan, 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65: 487–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty, 1994. Information status and word order: An analysis of English inversion. Language 70: 233–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty, 1996. Form and Function in English By-phrase Passives. Proceedings of the Chicago 23rd Annual Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society
Birner, Betty, & Gregory Ward, 1998. Information Status and Non-Canonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Black, J. B., & Gordon, Bower, 1980. Story understanding as problem solving. Poetics 9: 224–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane, 1988. The organization of discourse. In F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Blakemore, Diane, 1989. Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic account of BUT. Linguistics & Philosophy 12: 15–38CrossRef
Blass, Regina, 1990. Relevance Relations in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bolinger, Dwight, 1961. Contrastive accent and contrastive stress. Language 37: 83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight, 1972. Accent is predictable (if you're a mind-reader). Language 48: 639–44
Bolinger, Dwight, 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman
Bond, S. J., & John, Hayes, 1984. Cues people use to paragraph text. Research in the Teaching of English 18: 147–67Google Scholar
Bosch, P., & R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J., 1979. Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 2: 177–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddock, Richard, 1974. The frequency and placement of topic sentences in expository prose. Research in the Teaching of English 8: 287–302Google Scholar
Bransford, John, Richard, J. Barclay, & Jeffery, Franks, 1972. Sentence memory: A constructive vs interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology 3: 193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Susan E., 1995. Centering attention in discourse. Language & Cognitive Processes, 10: 137–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, James, Tony Burgess, Nancy Martin, Alex McLeod, & Harold Rosen, 1975. The Development of Writing Abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan
Brooks, Cleanth, & Robert Penn Warren, 1958. Modern Rhetoric. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company
Brown, Gillian, & George Yule, 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Brown, Penelope, & Colin Fraser, 1982. Social markers in speech. In K. Scherer & H. Giles (eds.), Advances in the Social Psychology of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Bruder, Gail, & Janyce Wiebe, 1995. Recognizing subjectivity and identifying subjective characters in third-person fictional narrative. In J. Duchan, G. Bruder, & L. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Approach. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Büring, Daniel, 1999. Topic. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Caenepeel, Mimo, 1989. Aspect, temporal ordering and perspective in narrative fiction. Ph. D. thesis, University of Edinburgh
Caenepeel, Mimo, 1995. Aspect and text structure. Linguistics 33: 213–53
Caenepeel, Mimo, 1997. Putting while in context. Human Communication Research Centre, #RP-85. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh
Caenepeel, Mimo, & Mark Moens, 1994. Temporal structure and discourse structure. In C. Vet & C. Vetters (eds.), Tense and Aspect in Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Caenepeel, Mimo & Görel Sandström, 1992. A discourse-level approach to the past perfect in narrative. In M. Aurnague, A. Borillo, M. Borillo, and M. Bras (eds.), Semantics of Time, Space, Movement and Spatio-temporal Reasoning. Toulouse: Université Paul Sabatier
Cairns, William B., 1902. The Forms of Discourse. Boston: Ginn & Co.
Cantrall, William, 1969. On the nature of the reflexive in English. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Illinois
Carlson, Greg, 1977. Reference to kinds in English. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts
Carlson, Greg, & Geoffrey Pelletier, 1995. The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Chafe, Wallace, 1976. Given, contrastiveness, definiteness, subject, topics and point of view. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press
Chafe, Wallace, 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (ed.), Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Company
Chafe, Wallace, 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Chafe, Wallace, 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Chafe, Wallace, & Joanna Nichols (eds.), 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation
Chierchia, Gennaro, 1992. Anaphora and dynamic binding. Linguistics & Philosophy 15: 111–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.
Chomsky, Noam, 1971. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An Inter-Disciplinary Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Chomsky, Noam, 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris
Christiansen, Francis. 1965. A generative rhetoric of the paragraph. College Composition and Communication 15: 144–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Chauncy, 1983. A Reference Grammar of Mandarin for English Speakers. New York: Peter Lang
Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Clancy, Patricia, 1980. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (ed.), The Pear Stories. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex
Clark, Andy, 1989. Microcognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Clark, Herbert, 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press
Clark, Herbert, 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cohan, Jocelyn, 2001. Reconsidering identificational focus. In M. Kim & U. Strauss (eds.), Proceedings of the New England Linguistic Society 31. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA, University of Massachusetts
Cohn, Dorritt, 1978. Transparent Minds. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press
Comrie, Bernard, 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Comrie, Bernard, 1983. Switch reference in Huichol: A typological study. In J. Haiman & P. Munro (eds.), Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Comrie, Bernard, 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Connors, Robert J., 1997. Composition–Rhetoric. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press
Corbett, Edward P., 1965. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York: Oxford University Press
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, 1989. Foregrounding and temporal relations in narrative discourse. In A. Schopf (ed.), Essays on Tensing in English, Vol. II. Tübingen: Niemeyer
Creider, Chet, 1979. On the explanation of transformations. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, Syntax & Semantics, 12. New York: Academic Press
Croft, William, 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Crothers, Edward, 1979. Paragraph Structure Inference. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex
Culicover, Peter, 1997. Principles and Parameters: An Introduction to Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Dahl, Oesten, 1974. Topic and comment structure revisited. In O. Dahl (ed.), Topic & Comment, Contextual Boundedness and Focus, Papers in Text Linguistics, 6. Hamburg: Buske
Danasio, Antonio, 2002. Remembering when. Scientific American 287: 66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneš, Frederik, 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia
Davison, Alice, 1984. Syntactic markedness and the notion of sentence topic. Language 60: 797–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, Alice, & Richard Lutz, 1985. Measuring syntactic complexity relative to discourse. In D. Dowty (ed.), Natural Language Processing: Psycholinguistic, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
de Beaugrande, Robert-Alain, & Wolfgang Dressler, 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman
Delin, Judy, 1995. Presupposition and shared knowledge in It-clefts. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 97–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy, & Jon, Oberlander, 1995. Syntactic constraints on discourse structure: the case of It-clefts. Linguistics 33: 465–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendale, Patrick, & Liliane Tasmowski (eds.), 2001. Evidentiality and related notions: Special issue. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 339–48
de Swart, Henriette, 1993. Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach. New York: Garland Publications
de Swart, Henriette, 1998. Introduction to Natural Language Semantics. Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications
de Swart, Henriette, 1999. Position and meaning: Time adverbials in context. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistics, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
van Dijk, Teun, 1972. Some Aspects of Text Grammars. The Hague: Mouton
van Dijk, Teun, 1977. Text and Context. London: Longman
van Dijk, Teun, 1982. Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In D. Tannen (ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages & Linguistics. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press
van Dijk, Teun, & Walter Kintsch, 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press
Dowty, David, 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Dowty, David, 1986. The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics? Linguistics & Philosophy 9: 37–62
Dowty, David, 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619CrossRef
Dowty, David, Robert Wall, & Stanley Peters, 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel
Duchan, Judith, Gail Bruder, & Lynne Hewitt (eds.), 1995. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum
Dundes, Alan, 1975. Analytic Essays in Folklare. The Hague: Mouton
Eggins, Suzanne, 1994. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers
Enç, Murvet, 1986. Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics & Philosophy 9: 405–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enç, Murvet, 1987. Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 633–57
Enç, Murvet, 1991. Tense and modality. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell
Erbaugh, Mary, 1986. Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers. In C. Craig (ed.), Noun Classes and Categorization. Philadelphia: Benjamins
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, 1979. Discourse constraints on dative movement. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, Syntax and Semantics, 12. New York: Academic Press
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, & Sheldon, Lappin, 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6: 41–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, & Tova Rapoport, in press. Bare aspect: A theory of syntactic projection. In J. Guéron and J. Lacarme (eds.), The Syntax of Time. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine, & Bergljot Behrens, 2000. Elaboration and related discourse relations viewed from an interlingual perspective. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Text Structure. Austin, Tex.: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas
Faigley, Lester, & Paul, Meyer, 1983. Rhetorical theory and readers' classification of text types. Text 3: 305–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Reprinted 1994, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fauconnier, Gilles, & Eve Sweetser (eds.), 1996. Spaces, World, and Grammar. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press
Ferro, Lisa, 1993. On “self” as a focus marker. In Michael Bernstein (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics
Fillmore, Charles, 1975. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club
von Fintel, Kai, 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. Ph. D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Firbas, Jan, 1964. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux de Circle Linguistique de Prague 1: 267–80Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan, 1974. Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to functional sentence perspective. In F. Daneš (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia
Firbas, Jan, 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Flashner, Vanessa, 1987. The grammatical marking of theme in oral Polish narrative. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Fleischman, Suzanne, 1991. Verb tense and point of view in narrative. In S. Fleischman & L. Waugh (eds.), Discourse-Pragmatics and the Verb. London: Routledge
Forster, Kenneth, 1979. Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (eds.), Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
Fox, Barbara, 1987a. Anaphora in popular English written narratives. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Fox, Barbara, 1987b. Discourse Structure and Anaphora in Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Frank, Anette, & Hans Kamp, 1997. On context dependence in modal constructions. In A. Lawson (ed.), SALT VII. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University
Frantz, Donald, 1966. Person indexing in Blackfoot. International Journal of American Linguistics, 32: 50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freksa, C., 1992. Using orientation information for qualitative spatial reasoning. In M. Aurnague et al. (eds.), Semantics of Time, Space, Movement and Spatio-temporal Reasoning. Toulouse: Université Paul Sabatier
Friedman, William, 1993. About Time. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Fries, Peter, 1983. On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. In J. Petöfi & E. Sözer (eds.), Micro and Macro Connexity in Texts. Hamburg: Helmut Buske
Fuller, Daniel, 1959. The Inductive Method of Bible Study, 3rd edition. Pasadena: Fuller Theological Seminary
Galbraith, Mary, 1995. Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement in narrative. In J. Duchan, G. Bruder, & L. Hewitt (eds.), Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Approach. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Garnham, Alan, 1983. What's wrong with story grammars? Cognition 15: 145–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnham, Alan, 1985. Psycholinguistics. London: Methuen
Garnham, Alan, 1987. Mental Models as Representation of Discourse and Text. Chichester: Ellis Horwood
Garnham, Alan, & Jane Oakhill, 1989. The everyday use of anaphoric expressions: Implications for the “mental models” theory of text comprehension. In N. E. Sharkey (ed.), Modelling Cognition: An Annual Review of Cognitive Science, Vol. I. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex
Garrod, Simon, & Anthony, Sanford, 1985. On the real-time character of interpretation during reading. Language & Cognitive Processes 1: 43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, Simon, & Anthony Sanford, 1994. Resolving sentences in a discourse context. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press
Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, & Ivan Sag, 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell
Gelman, Rachel, 1990. First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate/inanimate distinction. Cognitive Science 14: 79–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gérard, 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press
Genung, John F., 1900. The Working Principles of Rhetoric. Boston: Ginn & Co.
Giora, Rachel, 1983. Functional sentence perspective. In J. Petöfi & E. Sözer (eds.), Micro and Macro Connexity in Texts. Hamburg: Helmut Buske
Giorgi, Alessandra, & Fabio, Pianesi, 1991. Towards a syntax of temporal representations. Probus 2: 187–213Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra, & Fabio Pianesi, 1997. Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Givón, Talmy, 1979. From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, Syntax and Semantics, 12. New York: Academic Press
Givón, Talmy, 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Givón, Talmy, 1993. The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. In T. Givón (ed.), Voice and Inversion. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Glenberg, A. M., Mayer, M., & Linden, K., 1987. Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text interpretation. Journal of Memory & Language 26: 69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Ives, 1990. Aspects of the topic structure of Fox narratives: Proximate shifts and the use of overt and inflectional NPs. International Journal of American Linguistics 56: 317–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele, 1995. Constructions. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press
Gordon, Peter, & Davina, Chan, 1995. Pronouns, passives, and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory & Language 34: 216–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, Philip, 1965. Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 5: 107–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis, 1997. Modeling Discourse Topic: Sequential Relations and Strategies in Expository Texts. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex
Graesser, Arthur, 1981. Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word. New York: Springer
Green, Georgia, 1974. Semantics and Syntactic Regularity. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press
Grice, H. P., 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, Syntax and Semantics, 3. New York: Academic Press
Grice, H. P., 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Grimes, Joseph, 1975. The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton
Grimshaw, Jane, 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Groenendijk, Jeroen, & Martin, Stokhof, 1991. Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics & Philosophy 14: 39–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, S., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R., 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65: 203–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara, 1977. The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Tech Note, 15. Menlo Park, Calif.: Artificial Intelligence Center, SRI International
Grosz, Barbara, & Candace, Sidner, 1986. Attention, intensions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12: 175–204Google Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey, 1965. Studies in Lexical Relations. Ph. D. dissertation, MIT. Reprinted Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club
Gundel, Jeannette, 1974. The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Texas. Reprinted 1977, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club
Gundel, Jeannette, 1998. Centering theory and a givenness hierarchy. In M. Walker, A. Joshi, & E. Prince (eds.), Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Gundel, Jeannette, 1999. On different kinds of focus. In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Gundel, Jeannette, Nancy, Hedberg, & Ron, Zacharski, 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos, 1983. Focus, mode and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics 19: 377–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutwinski, Waldemar, 1976. Cohesion in Literary Texts. The Hague: Mouton
HagègeClaude, , 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69: 297–310Google Scholar
Haiman, John, & Pamela Munro (eds.), Switch Reference and Universal Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Hajičová, Eva, 1971. Some remarks on presupposition. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 17: 11–23Google Scholar
HajičováEva, , & Petr, Sgall, 1987. The ordering principle. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 435–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajičová, Eva, M. Cervenka, O. Leška, & Petr Sgall (eds.), 1995. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, nouvelle série, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Hajičová, Eva, Barbara Partee, & Petr Sgall, 1998. Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Hale, Kenneth, & Samuel Jay Keyser, 1993. On argument stucture and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale & S. J. Kayser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvan Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Halliday, Michael A. K., 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part II. Journal of Linguistics 3: 199–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., 1992. Some lexicogrammatical features of the Aero Population Growth Text. In W. Mann & S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Halliday, Michael A. K., & Ruqaiya Hasan, 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman
Hamburger, Käte, 1973. The Logic of Literature. Trans. Marilynn Rose. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press
Hannay, Mike, 1991. Pragmatic function assignment and word order variation in a functional grammar of English. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 131–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig, 1982. A Grammar of English on Mathematical Principles. New York: Methuen
Haviland, Susan, & Herbert, Clark, 1974. What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 13: 512–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John, 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hearst, Marti, 1997. TextTiling: Segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic passages. Computational Linguistics 23: 33–64Google Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy, 1990. Discourse pragmatics and cleft sentences in English. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota
Heim, Irene, 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite Nounphrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts
Herbst, Peter, 1956. The nature of facts. In A. Flew (ed.), Essays in Conceptual Analysis. New York: MacMillan
Heycock, Caroline, & Anthony, Kroch. 1999. Pseudo-cleft connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 365–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyrich, Wolfgang, Fritz Neubauer, Janos Petöfi, & Erich Sözer (eds.), 1989. Connexity and Coherence. Berlin: De Gruyter
Hinds, John, 1977. Paragraph structure and pronominalization. Papers in Linguistics 10: 77–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, John, 1979. Organizational patterns in discourse. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, Syntax & Semantics, 12. New York: Academic Press
Hinrichs, Erhard, 1986. Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics & Philosophy 9: 63–82Google Scholar
Hirose, Yukio, 2000. Public and private self as two aspects of the speaker: A contrastive study of Japanese and English. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1623–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia, 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York: Garland Press
Hobbs, Jerry, 1985. On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse. Report No. CSLI-85–37. Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information
Hockett, Charles, 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan
Hoey, Michael, 1991. Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hopper, Paul, 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, Syntax & Semantics, 12. New York: Academic Press
Horn, Laurence, 1988. Pragmatic theory. In F. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistic Theory: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Horn, Laurence, 1991. Given as new: When redundant information isn't. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 305–28
Hornstein, Norbert, 1990. As Time Goes By. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Hovy, Eduard, 1993. Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. Artificial Intelligence 63: 341–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S., & G. Thompson (eds.), 2000. Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Jackendoff, Ray, 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray, 1987. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–411
Jackendoff, Ray, 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press
Jacobsen, William, 1967. Switch-reference in Hokan-Coahuiltecan. In D. Hymes & W. Biddle (eds.), Studies in Southwestern Ethnolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton
Jakobson, Roman, 1957. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In L. Waugh & M. Halle (eds.), Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies 1931–1981. Berlin: Mouton, 1984
Jesperson, Otto, 1940. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. London: George Allen & Unwin
Jesperson, Otto, 1924/1965. The Philosophy of Grammar. New York: W. W. Norton
Johnson-Laird, Philip, 1983. Mental Models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Johnson-Laird, Philip, 1988. The Computer and the Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
Johnson-Laird, Philip, 1989. Mental models. In M. Posner (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Johnson-Laird, Philip, & Rosemary, Stevenson, 1970. Memory for syntax. Nature 227: 412CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, Aravind, & Scott Weinstein, 1981. Control of inference: Role of some aspects of discourse structure – centering. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver
Kameyama, Megumi, 1985. Zero anaphora: The case of Japanese. Ph. D. dissertation, Stanford University
Kameyama, Megumi, 1998. Intrasentential centering: A case study. In M. Walker, A. Joshi, & E. Prince (eds.), Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kamio, Aki, 1994. The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 67–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans, 1981. A theory of truth and semantic interpretation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stockhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum Tracts. Also in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information. Dordrecht: Foris
Kamp, Hans, 1985. Context, thought and communication. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 85: 239–61CrossRef
Kamp, Hans, & Uwe Reyle, 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Kamp, Hans, & Christian Rohrer, 1983. Tense in texts. In R. Bauerle, R. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: de Gruyter
Karttunen, Lauri, 1976. Discourse referents. In J. McCawley (ed.), Notes from the Linguistic Underground, Syntax and Semantics, 7. New York: Academic Press
Keenan, Elinor, & Bambi Schieffelin, 1976. Topic as a discourse notion. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press
Kennedy, George, 1991. Aristotle on Rhetoric. Translation and Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kinneavy, James, 1971. A Theory of Discourse. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
Kintsch, Walter, 1988. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review 95: 163–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiss, Katalin, 1986. The order and scope of operators in the Hungarian sentence. In W. Abraham & S. de Meij (eds.), Topic, Focus and Configurationality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Kiss, Katalin, 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 245–73CrossRef
Klaiman, M. H., 1991. Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Knott, Alistair, 1996. A data-driven methodology for motivating a set of coherence relations. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh
Koen, Frank, Alton Becker, & Richard Young, 1966. The psychological reality of the paragraph. In E. Zale (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Language and Language Behavior. New York: Appleton
Kratzer, Angelika, 1981. The notional category of modality. In H. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts. Berlin: De Gruyter
Kratzer, Angelika, 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press
Krifka, Manfred, 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In R. Bartsch et al. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expressions. Dordrecht: Foris
Krifka, Manfred, 1991. A compositional semantics for multiple Focus constructions. In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 1, Working Papers in Linguistics, 10. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press
Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Gregory Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, & Godehard Link, 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In G. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press
Kuno, Susumo, 1972. Functional sentence perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 161–95Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo, 1976. Subject, theme, and speaker's empathy: A re-examination of relativization phenomena. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press
Kuno, Susumo, 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press
Kuppevelt, , Jan, 1995. Disourse structure, topicality, and questioning. Journal of Linguistics 31: 109–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kuppevelt, 1996. Directionality in discourse: Prominence difference in subordination relations. Journal of Semantics 13: 363–95CrossRef
Kuroda, Yuki, 1973. Where epistemology, grammar and style meet: A case study from Japanese. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston
Labov, William, & Joshua Waletzky, 1966. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts: Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Meeting, American Ethnological Society. Seattle: University of Washington Press
Lambrecht, Knud, 1986. Pragmatically motivated syntax: Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society
Lambrecht, Knud, 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Larson, Richard, 1984. Classifying discourse. In R. J. Connors, L. S. Ede, & A. Lunsford (eds.), Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press
Lascarides, Alex, & Nicholas, Asher, 1993. Temporal interpretation, discourse relations, and commonsense entailment. Linguistics & Philosophy 16: 437–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Gregory, 1971. Subjects and Agents II. Working Papers in Linguistics, 7. Columbus, Ohio: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University
Leška, Oldrich, 1995. Prague school teaching of the classical period and beyond. In E. Hajičová, M. Cervenka, O. Leška, & P. Sgall (eds.), Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, nouvelle série, Vol. I. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Leslie, A. M., 1994. ToMM, To By, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. Hirschfield & S. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Levin, Beth, 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press
Levinson, Stephen, 1979/1992: Activity types in language. Linguistics 17: 356–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen, 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Lewis, David, 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. In R. Bauerle, U. Egli, & A. von Stchow (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin: De Gruyter
Li, Charles, & Sandra Thompson, 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press
Linde, Charlotte, 1979. Focus of attention and choice of pronouns in discourse. In T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, Syntax & Semantics, 12. New York: Academic Press
Linde, Charlotte, 1993. Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Litman, David, 1985. Plan recognition and discourse analysis: An integrated approach for understanding dialogues. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Rochester
Longacre, Robert, 1968. Discourse, Paragraph, and Sentence Structure in Selected Philippine Languages. Santa Ana, Calif.: Summer Institute of Linguistics
Longacre, Robert, 1979. The paragraph as a grammatical unit. In. T. Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, Syntax and Semantics, 12. New York: Academic Press
Longacre, Robert, 1983/1996. The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press
Longacre, Robert, 1992. The discourse strategy of an appeals letter. In W. Mann & S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Loriot, James, & Hollenbach, B., 1970. Shipibo paragraph structure. Foundations of Language 6: 43–66Google Scholar
Lunsford, Andrea, & Lisa Ede, 1984. On distinctions between classical and modern rhetoric. In R. J. Connors, L. Ede, & A. Lunsford (eds.), Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
Lyons, John, 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lyons, John, 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Mann, William, & Sandra Thompson, 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. ISI Reprint Series, ISI /RS-87–90. Marina Del Rey, Calif.: Information Sciences Institute
Mann, William, & Sandra Thompson, 1992. Rhetorical Structure theory and text analysis. In W. Mann & S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Mann, William, & Sandra Thompson, 2000. Two Views of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Lyon, France: Society for Text and Discourse
Markels, Robin Bell, 1984. A New Perspective on Cohesion in Expository Paragraphs. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
Marr, David, 1982. Vision. San Francisco, Calif.: Freeman
Marslen-Wilson, William, E. Levy, & Lorraine Tyler, 1982. Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place and Action. Chichester: Wiley
Martin, J. R., 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins
Mathesius, Vilém, 1928/1964. On linguistic characterology with illustrations from modern English. Reprinted in J. Vachek (ed.), A Prague School Reader in Linguistics. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press
Matthiessen, Christian, & Sandra Thompson, 1988. The structure of discourse and “subordination.” In J. Haiman & S. Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
McArthur, Tom (ed.), 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
McClelland, James, & David Rumelhart, 1986. PDP: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. II. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
McNally, Louise, 1998. On recent formal analyses of topic. In J. Ginzburg, Z. Khasidashvili, C. Vogel, J. Lévy, & E. Vallduví (eds.), The Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation: Selected Papers. Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information
Michaelis, Laura, 1994. The ambiguity of the English present perfect. Journal of Linguistics 30: 111–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, George, Eugene Galanter, & Karl Pribram, 1960. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Miller, Philip, 2001. Discourse constraints on (non)-extraposition from subject in English. Linguistics 39: 683–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Jean-Claude, 1973. De la syntaxe à l'interprétation: Quantités, Insultes, Exclamations. Paris: Seuil
Milsark, Gary, 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–30Google Scholar
Mitchell, Jonathan, 1986. The formal semantics of point of view. Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Massachusetts
Moens, Mark, 1987. Tense, aspect, and temporal reference. Ph. D. thesis, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh
Moens, Mark, & Mark Steedman. 1987. Temporal ontology in natural language. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford, California
Morgan, Jerry L., 1975. Some remarks on the nature of sentences. In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society
Morris, Jane, & Graeme, Hirst, 1991. Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics 17: 21–48Google Scholar
Moyne, John, 1971. Reflexive and Emphatic. Language 47: 141–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, Ulric, 1967. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton Century Croft
Nuyts, Jan, 1993. Modality and the layered representation of conceptual and linguistic structures. Linguistics 31: 933–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakhill, Jane, Alan, Garnham, & Willem, Vonk, 1989. The online construction of discourse models. Language & Cognitive Processes 4: SI 263–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogihara, Toshiyuki, 1996. Tense, Attitude, and Scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Olman, Lynda, 1998. Evidence for iconicity: The instance relation in informational exposition. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin
Palacas, Arthur, 1993. Attribution semantics: Linguistic worlds and point of view. Discourse Processes 16: 239–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank, 1983. Semantic explanations for the syntax of English modals. In F. Heny & B. Richards (eds.), Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles, Vol. II. Dordrecht: Reidel
Palmer, Frank, 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Parkes, M. B., 1993. Pause and Effect. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press
Parsons, Terence, 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Partee, Barbara, 1973. The syntax and semantics of quotation. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festchrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Partee, Barbara, 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics & Philosophy 7: 243–86CrossRef
Partee, Barbara, 1987. Nounphrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenenjik, D. de Jongh, & M. Stockhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Foris
Partee, Barbara, 1991. Topic, focus, and quantification. In S. Moore & A. Wyner (eds.), Proceedings of SALT I. Ithaca, N.Y.: Department of Linguistics, Cornell University
Penhallurick, John, 1984. Full-verb inversion in English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 4: 33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Philip, 1997. Fact, Proposition, Event. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub-lishers
Petöfi, J. S., 1978. A few comments on the methodology of text theoretical research. Journal of Pragmatics 2: 365–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet, 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph. D. dissertation, MIT
Polanyi, Livia, 1988. A formal model of the structure of discourse structure and discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 601–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria, 1996. Situation perspective: on the relations of thematic roles, discourse categories, and grammatical relations to figure and ground. In A. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications
Porter, Bruce, et al., 1988. AI Research in the Context of a Multifunctional Knowledge Base. AI Laboratory Report, 88–88. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas
Portner, Paul, & Katsuhiko, Yabushita, 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of topic phrases. Linguistics & Philosophy 21: 117–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prideaux, Gary, 1993. Subordination and information distribution in oral and written narratives. Pragmatics & Cognition 1: 51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen, 1978a. Comparison of Wh-clefts and It-clefts in discourse. Language 54: 883–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen, 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press
Prince, Ellen, 1986. On the syntactic marking of presupposed open-propositions. In Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society
Prince, Ellen, 1992. The ZPG Letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. In W. Mann & S. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Prince, Ellen, 1997. On the functions of Left-dislocation in English discourse. In A. Kamio (ed.), Directions in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Prince, Gerald, 1987. A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press
Propp, Vladimir, 1958. Morphology of the Folktale. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik, 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman
Reichenbach, Hans, 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. London: Macmillan
Reinhart, Tanya, 1980. Conditions for text coherence. Poetics Today 1: 161–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya, 1982. Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics. Indiana University Linguistics Club
Reinhart, Tanya, & Eric Reuland, 1991. Anaphors and logophors: An argument structure perspective. In J. Koster & E. Reuland (eds.), Long Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E., 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720Google Scholar
Rieser, Hannes, 1978. On the development of text grammar. In W. Dressler (ed.), Current Trends in Textlinguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter
Rizzi, Luigi, 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Roberts, John, 1988. Arnele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 45–63Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael, 1986. Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Rooth, M., 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John, 1970. On declarative sentences. In R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Co.
Ross, John, 1972. Act. In D. Davison and G. Harmon (eds.), Semantics of Natural Languages. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel
Rumelhart, David, 1975. Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (eds.), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press
Sachs, Jacqueline, 1967. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics 2: 437–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, José, & Gisela Redecker, 1996. Perspective and representation of speech in narrative discourse. In G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, World, and Grammar. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press
Sandstrom, Görel, 1993. When-clauses and the Temporal Interpretation of Narrative Discourse. Umea, Sweden: University of Umea
Sanford, A. J., & Simon Garrod, 1981. Understanding Written Language. Chicester: Wiley
Sanford, Anthony, & Linda Moxey, 1995. Aspects of coherence in written language: A psychological perspective. In M. Gernsbacher & T. Givón (eds.), Coherence in Spontanteous Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Sasse, Hans, 1987. The thetic–categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger, & R. P. Abelson, 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goal, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum
Schiffrin, Deborah, 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Schlenker, Phillipe, 1999. Propositional attitudes and indexicality: A cross-categorial approach. Ph. D. dissertation, MIT
Sells, Peter, 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445–79Google Scholar
Sgall, Petr, 1995. Formal and computational linguistics in Prague. In E. Hajičová, M. Cervenka, O. Leška, & P. Sgall (eds.), Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, Nouvelle Série, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajičová, & E. Burànová, 1986. The Meaning of the Sentence in its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Prague: Academia
Smith, Carlota S., 1971. Sentences in discourse: An analysis of a discourse by Bertrand Russell. Journal of Linguistics 7: 213–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota S., 1980. Temporal structures in discourse. In N. Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers. Tübingen: Niemeyer
Smith, Carlota S., 1991. A valediction for sentence topic. In C. Georgopoulos & R. Ishihara (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Smith, Carlota S., 1995a. The range of aspectual situation types: Shifts and a bounding paradox. In P. Bertinetto et al. (eds.), Temporal Reference: Aspect and Actionality. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier
Smith, Carlota S., 1995b. The relation between aspectual viewpoint and situation type. Address, Linguistic Society of America. Published electronically, Eric database
Smith, Carlota S., 1995c. Aspect and temporal location in Discourse Representation Theory. Unpublished ms., University of Texas
Smith, Carlota S., 1997. The Parameter of Aspect, 2nd edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Smith, Carlota S., 1999a. Closed systems in texts. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Text Structure. Austin, Tex.: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas
Smith, Carlota S., 1999b. Activities: States or Events?Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 479–508CrossRef
Smith, Carlota S., & Mary Erbaugh, 2001. Temporal information in sentences of Mandarin. In X. Liejiong and S. Jingmin (eds.), New Views in Chinese Syntactic Research: International Symposium on Chinese Grammar for the New Millennium. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Jiaoya Chuban she
Speas, Margaret, 1990. Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Speas, Margaret, & Carol Tenny, in press. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In A. di Scuillo (ed.), Proceedings of UQAM Asymmetry Workshop. Montreal: University of Québec at Montreal
Sperber, Dan, & Deirdre Wilson, 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell
Stalnaker, Richard, 1978. Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, Syntax and Semantics, 9. New York: Academic Press
Stark, , Heather, , 1988. What do paragraph markings do? Discourse Processes 11: 275–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, Mark, 2000. The Syntactic Process. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Stern, , Arthur, , 1976. When is a paragraph? College Composition and Communication 36: 253–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, Leslie, 1993. Switch-Reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Stoddard, Sally, 1991. Text and Texture: Patterns of Cohesion. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex
Stowell, Tim, 1996. The phrase structure of tense. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Strawson, Peter, 1964. Identifying reference and truth value. Theoreia 30: 96–118. Reprinted in D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (eds.), 1971. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Svarthvik, Jan, 1966. On Voice in the English Verb. The Hague: Mouton
Swales, John, 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Talmy, Leonard, 1978. Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. Greenberg, C. Ferguson, & E. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language: Syntax. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
Talmy, Leonard, 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Talmy, Leonard, 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Tannen, Deborah, 1989. Talking Voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Tardieu, Hubert, Marie-France, Ehrlich & Valérie Gyselinkck, , 1992. Levels of representation and domain-specific knowledge in comprehension of scientific texts. Language & Cognitive Processes 7: 335–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Barry, 1977. Tense and continuity. Linguistics & Philosophy 1: 199–220Google Scholar
Thomason, Lucy, 1994. The assignment of proximate and obviative in informal Fox narrative. Ms., The University of Texas at Austin
Thompson, Ellen, 1999. The temporal structure of discourse: The syntax and semantics of temporal then. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17: 123–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, & Susan Hunston, 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Thompson, Sandra, 1987. The passive in English: A discourse perspective. In R. Chaman & L. Shockey (eds.), In Honor of Ilse Lehiste. Dordrecht: Foris
Thompson, Sandra, 2001. “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. To appear in Studies in Language
Thorndyke, P. W., 1977. Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology 9: 77–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell (ed.), 1987. Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Tracy, H. P., & S. H. Levinsohn, 1977. Participant reference in Ica expository discourse. In R. Longacre (ed.), Discourse Grammar, Part III. Dallas, Tex.: Summer Institute of Linguistics
Turner, Elizabeth, & Ragnar, Rommetveit, 1968. Focus of attention in recall of active and passive sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7: 543–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric, 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland Press
Vallduví, Enric, & Elisabet, Engdahl, 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34: 459–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric, & Maria Vilkuna, 1998. On rheme and kontrast. In P. Culicover & L. McNally (eds.), The Limits of Syntax, Syntax and Semantics, 26. New York: Academic Press
Vendler, Zeno, 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 66: 143–60. Reprinted in Vendler, 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press
Vendler, Zeno, 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press
Vendler, Zeno, 1972. Res Cogitans: An Essay in Rational Psychology. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press
Venneman, Theodor, 1975. Topic, sentence accent, ellipsis: A proposal for their formal treatment. In E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Verkuyl, Henk, 1972. On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Foundations of Language Supplementary Series, Vol. XV. Dordrecht: Reidel
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1505–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlach, Frank, 1981. The semantics of the progressive. In P. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (eds.), Tense and Aspect, Syntax and Semantics, 14. Academic Press, New York
Voegelin, C. F., & Voegelin, F. M., 1975. Hopi (-qa). International Journal of American Linguistics 41: 381–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vonk, Wietske, Lettica, Hustinx, & Wim, Simons, 1992. The use of referential expressions in structuring discourse. Language & Cognitive Processes 7: 302–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Marilyn, Aravind Joshi, & Ellen Prince (eds.), 1998. Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Ward, Gregory, & Ellen, Prince, 1991. On the topicalization of indefinite NPs. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 167–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whately, Richard, 1828/1963. Elements of Rhetoric. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois Press
Whorf, Benjamin L., 1956. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York: Wiley and Son
Whitaker, Jeanne, & CarlotaSmith, S., 1985. Some significant omissions: Ellipsis in Flaubert's “Un Coeur Simple.”Language, and Style 14: 251–92Google Scholar
Wiebe, Janyce, 1991. Tracking point of view in narrative. Computational Linguistics 20: 233–87Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas, 1988. A crosslinguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12: 51–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Anthony, & Jo Ray McCuen, 1988. Rhetoric Made Plain. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1958. The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Woodbury, Anthony, 1987. Native American Discourse: Poetics and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wright, , Karen, , 2002. Times of our lives. Scientific American 287: 58–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zagona, Karen, 1990. Times as temporal argument structure. Unpublished ms., University of Washington, Seattle
Zribi-Hertz, Ann, 1989. Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns. Language 65: 695–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold, 1971. In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 222–33Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Carlota S. Smith, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Modes of Discourse
  • Online publication: 18 June 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615108.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Carlota S. Smith, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Modes of Discourse
  • Online publication: 18 June 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615108.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Carlota S. Smith, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Modes of Discourse
  • Online publication: 18 June 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615108.016
Available formats
×