Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T11:12:19.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Microclimates of Physical Systems

from Part I - Controls of Microclimate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Roger G. Barry  and
Peter D. Blanken
Roger G. Barry
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Peter D. Blanken
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

This chapter continues the presentation of microclimatic conditions in different environments, here treating the physical systems of lakes, rivers, snow cover, mountains, and cities.

Lakes

Lakes account for about 3 percent of the Earth's land surface with an annual maximum of 3.8 percent based on AMSR-E data (J. Kimball, p.c. 2011). Verpoorter et al. (2014) use imagery from the Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) sensor on board the Landsat 7 satellite collected in year 2000 ± 3 years. For all lakes >0.002 km2, they estimate ~117 million lakes with a combined surface area of about 5 × 106 km2, which is 3.7 percent of the Earth's non-glaciated land area.

The largest in terms of surface area is Lake Superior at 82,400 km2 followed by Lake Victoria in East Africa at 69,500 km2. The deepest (>1600 m) is Lake Baikal in southern Siberia, which contains 20 percent of the world's freshwater. In the central Mackenzie basin of western Canada, lakes occupy 37 percent of the land surface. Wetzel (2001) provides a comprehensive treatment of limnology – the study of lakes and river systems and their ecology.

Water is an excellent absorber of shortwave radiation (a low albedo of 0.06–0.10); however, the amount of shortwave radiation reflected and hence not absorbed in the water column is affected by the water clarity (turbidity) and the angle of incidence between the Sun's rays and the water surface (solar zenith angle; wind/waves).

In clear water blue and violet light penetrate farthest and red light is absorbed first. However, the opposite is observed in very turbid lakes, or where there is dense phytoplankton (Ganf, 1974). In Lake George, Uganda, red light (0.5–0.7 μm) representing 10 percent of the total surface light reaches a depth of 50 cm and only 1 percent reaches a depth of 90 cm. In Lake Windermere in the Lake District of northwest England, Pearsall and Ullyott (1934) measured the percentages of full daylight penetrating to 1.0 m and 4.3 m depths over a year. The values at the 1-m depth ranged from almost 47 percent in March to 21 percent in August and correspondingly, 6.7 percent in March and 1.5 percent in June at a depth of 4.3 m. The penetration is shown to depend on the abundance of phytoplankton in the surface layers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Microclimate and Local Climate , pp. 187 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, R.L. et al. 2005. Updated 2007. Global monthly EASE-Grid snow water equivalent climatology. Boulder, CO: National Snow and Ice Data Center. Digital media.
Anderson, P. D., Larson, D. J., and Chan, S. S. 2007. Riparian buffer and density management influences on microclimate of young headwater forests of western Oregon. Forest Sci. 53, 254–69.Google Scholar
Arnfield, A. J. 2003. Two decades of urban climate research: A review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int. J. Clim. 23, 1–26.Google Scholar
Barry, R. G. 2008. Mountain weather and climate.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bennie, J. et al. 2008. Slope, aspect and climate: Spatially explicit and implicit models of topographic microclimate in chalk grassland. Ecol. Modelling 216, 47–59.Google Scholar
Blanken, P. D. et al. 2000. Eddy covariance measurements of evaporation from Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada,Water Resour. Res. 36(4),1069–77.Google Scholar
Blanken, P. D. et al. 2011. Evaporation from Lake Superior. 1. Physical controls and processes. J. Great Lakes Res. 37(4), 707–16.Google Scholar
Blumthaler, M., Ambach, W., and Rehwald, W. 1992. Solar UV-A and UV-B radiation fluxes at two alpine stations at different altitudes. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 46, 39–44Google Scholar
Brown, R. D., and Gillespie, T. J. 1995. Microclimatic landscape design: Creating thermal comfort and energy efficiency.New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
Brunt, D. 1941. Physical and dynamical meteorology.London: Cambridge University Press, p. 428.
Clements, C. B., Whiteman, C. D., and Horel, J. D. 2003: Cold -air-pool structure and evolution in a mountain basin: Peter Sinks, Utah. J. Appl. Met. 42, 752–68.Google Scholar
Cline, D. W. 1997. Effect of seasonality of snow accumulation and melt on snow surface energy exchanges at a continental alpine site. J. Appl. Met. 36, 32–51.Google Scholar
COESA. 1962. U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1962. Washington DC: Comm. Extension Standard Atmosphere.
Cristofor, S. et al. 1994. Factors affecting light penetration in shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 275/276, 493–8.Google Scholar
Deems, J. S., Painter, T. H., and Finnegan, D. C. 2013. Lidar measurement of snow depth: a review. J. Glaciol. 59, 467–79.Google Scholar
Doulatyan, B. et al. 2014. River flow regimes and vegetation dynamics along a river transect. Adv. Water Resour. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.06.015.Google Scholar
Dozier, J. et al. 1988. The spectral bidirectional reflectance of snow. In: Spectral signatures of objects in remote sensing. Proceedings of the conference held 18–22 January, 1988 in Aussois (Modane), France. (T. D. Guyenne and J. J. Hunt, eds.). ESA SP-287. European Space Agency, pp. 87–92.
Dumont, M. et al. 2010. High-accuracy measurements of snow Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function at visible and NIR wavelengths – comparison with modelling results. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 2507–20.Google Scholar
Ganf, C. G. 1974. Incident solar irradiance and underwater light penetration as factors controlling the chlorophyll A content of a shallow equatorial lake (Lake George, Uganda). J. Ecol. 62, 593–609.Google Scholar
Glidden, D. E. 1982. Winter wind studies in Rocky Mountain National Park. Estes Park, CO: Rocky Mountain Nature Association.
Granger, R. J., and Male, D. H. 1978. Melting of a prairie snowpack. J. Appl. Met. 17, 1833–42.Google Scholar
Gray, D. M. et al. 1979. Snow accumulation and redistribution. In Proceedings, Modeling of’ Snow Cover Runoff (S. C. Colbeck and M. Ray eds.). Hanover, NH: U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, pp. 3–33.
Gronskaya, T. P. 2000. Ice thickness in relation to climate forcing in Russia. Verh. Int. Verein Limnol., 27, 2800–2.
Grünewald, T., Bühler, Y., and Lehning, M. 2014. Elevation dependency of mountain snow depth. The Cryosphere 8, 2381-94.
Hedstrom, N.R., and Pomeroy, J.W. 1998. Accumulation of intercepted snow in the boreal forest: measurements and modelling. Hydrol. Processes 12, 1611–23.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. T., and Watson, I. D. 1984. The determination of view-factors in urban canyons. J. Climate Appl. Met. 23, 329–35.Google Scholar
Judson, A., and Doesken, N. J. 2000. Density of freshly fallen snow in the Central Rocky Mountains. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. 81, 1577–87.Google Scholar
Kattel, D. B. et al. 2013. Temperature lapse rate in complex mountain terrain on the southern slope of the central Himalayas. Theoret. Appl. Clim. 113, 671–82.Google Scholar
Kattel, D. B. et al. 2015. A comparison of temperature lapse rates from the northern to the southern slopes of the Himalayas. Int. J. Climatol. in press.Google Scholar
Kodama, Y., Easton, F., and Wendler, G. 1983. The influence of Lake Minichumina, interior Alaska, on its surroundings. Arch. Met. Geoph. Biocl. B 33, 199–218.Google Scholar
Kuz'min, P. P. 1972. Melting of snow cover. (Russian version 1961). Jerusalem: Israel Prog. Sci. Transl.
Loope, L. L., and Giambelluca, T. W. 1998. Vulnerability of island tropical montane cloud forests to climate change, with special reference to east Maui, Hawaii. Clim. Change 39, 503–17.Google Scholar
Marty, C. et al. 2002. Altitude dependence of surface radiation fluxes and cloud forcing in the Alps: Results from the Alpine Surface Radiation Budget network. Theoret. Appl. Climatol. 72, 137–55.Google Scholar
Michel, B. 1971. Winter energy balances of rivers and lakes. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Monograph III-B1a. Hanover, NH: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Milburn, D. 2008. The ice cycle on Canadian rivers. In Beltaos, S. (ed.), River ice breakup.Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources, pp. 21–49.
Miller, D. H. 1955. Snow cover and climate in the Sierra Nevada, California. Univ. of California Publ. in Geography 11.Google Scholar
Mills, G. 1997. An urban-canyon layer climate model. Theoret. Appl. Clim. 57, 229–44.Google Scholar
Mueller, H. 1984. Zum Strahlungshaushalt im Alpenraum. Mitteil.Versuchsanstalt Wasserbau. Hydrol. Glaziol. No. 71. Zurich: ETH.Google Scholar
Mueller, H. 1985. Review paper on the radiation budget in the Alps. J. Climatol. 5, 445–62.Google Scholar
Muneepeerakul, R., Rinaldo, A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, J. 2007. Effects of river flow scaling properties on riparian width and vegetation biomass. Water Resour. Res. 43(12). doi: 10.1029/2007WR006100.Google Scholar
Naiman, R. J., and Décamps, H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 621–58.Google Scholar
Naiman, R.L., Décamps, H. and Pollock, M. 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol. Appl., 3, 209–12.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y., and Oke, T. R. 1988. Wind, temperature and stability conditions in an E-W oriented urban canyon. Atmos. Environ. 22, 2691–2700.Google Scholar
Oke, T. R. 1981. Canyon geometry and the nocturnal urban heat island: comparison of scale model and field observations. J. Climatol. 1, 237–54.Google Scholar
Oke, T. R. 1988a. Street design and urban canopy layer climate. Energy and Buildings 11, 103–13.Google Scholar
Oke, T. R. 1988b. The urban energy balance. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 12, 471–508.Google Scholar
Painter, T. H., and Dozier, J. 2004. Measurements of the hemispherical-directional reflectance of snow at fine spectral and angular resolution, J. Geophys. Res. 109, D18115. doi: 10.1029/2003JD004458.Google Scholar
Pearsall, W. H., and Ullyott, P. 1934. Light penetration into freshwater. III. Seasonal variations in the light conditions in Windermere in relation to vegetation. J. Theoret. Biol. 11, 89–93.Google Scholar
Pepin, N. 2001. Lapse rate changes in northern England. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 68, 1–16.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, J. W., and Brun, E. 2001. Physical properties of snow. In Jones, H. G., Pomeroy, J. W., Walker, D. A. and Hoham, R. W., (eds.), Snow ecology: an interdisciplinary examination of snow-covered ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–118.
Prowse, T. D. 1995. River ice processes. In Beltaos, S. (ed.), River ice jams.Highlands Ranch, CO: Water Resources, pp. 29–70.
Pulliainen, J. 2008. Mapping of snow water equivalent and snow depth in boreal and sub-arctic zones by assimilating space-borne microwave radiometer data and ground-based observations. Remote Sensing Environ. 101, 257–69.Google Scholar
Ramamurthy, P. et al. 2014. Influence of subfacet heterogeneity and material properties on the urban surface energy budget. J. Appl. Met. Climatol. 53, 2114–29.Google Scholar
Rambo, T. R., and North, M. P. 2008. Spatial and temporal variability of canopy microclimate in a Sierra Nevada riparian forest. Northwest Sci. 82, 259–68.DGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. et al. 2009. River networks as ecological corridors: A complex systems perspective for integrating hydrologic, geomorphologic, and ecologic dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 45, W01413. doi:10.1029/2008WR007124.Google Scholar
Rolland, C. 2003. Spatial and seasonal variations of air temperature lapse rates in Alpine regions. J. Clim. 16, 1032–46.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. R. et al. 2005. Role of northern lakes in a regional energy balance. J. Hydromet. 6, 291–305.Google Scholar
Schaepman-Strub, G. et al., 2006. Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing definitions and case studies. Rem. Sens. Environ., 1103, 27–42.
Scherrer, D. and Körner, C. 2010. Infra-red thermometry of alpine landscapes challenges climatic warming projections. Global Change Biol., 16, 2602–613.
Schmidt, W. 1934. Observations on local climatology in Austrian mountains. Quart. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 60, 345–62.Google Scholar
Schwarb, M. et al. 2001. Mittlere jährliche Niederschlagshöhen im europäischen Alpenraum. In Hydrologische Atlas der Schweiz.Bern, Switzerland: Landeshyrdrologie, Bundesamt f. Wasser u. Geologie, Plate 2.6.
Serreze, M. C. et al. 1999. Characteristics of the western United States snowpack from snowpack telemetry (SNOTEL) data. Water Resour. Res. 35(7), 2145–60.Google Scholar
Shanks, E. 1956. Altitudinal and microclimatic relationships of soil temperature under natural vegetation. Ecology 37, 1–7.Google Scholar
Shreve, F. 1924. Forest soil temperatures as influenced by altitude and slope exposure. Ecology 5,128–36.Google Scholar
Spangenberg, J. et al. 2008. Simulation of the influence of vegetation on microclimate and thermal comfort in the city of São Paulo. Rev. Soc. Brasil. Arbor. Urbana 3(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
Spreafico, M., and Weingartner, R. 2005. The hydrology of Switzerland: Selected aspects and results. Water Series no. 7. Bern, Switzerland: Bundesamt f. Wasser u. Geologie.
Spence, C. et al. 2011. Evaporation from Lake Superior. 2. Spatial distribution and variability. J. Great Lakes Res. 37(4), 717–24.Google Scholar
Sturm, M. et al. 1997. The thermal conductivity of seasonal snow. J. Glaciol. 43(143), 26–41.Google Scholar
Sturm, M., Holmgren, J., and Liston, G. E. 1995. A seasonal snow cover classification system for local to global app1ications. J. Climate 8, 1261–83.Google Scholar
Suckling, P. W. 1980. The energy balance microclimate of a suburban lawn. J. Appl. Met. 29, 606–8.Google Scholar
Tabler, R. D., and Schmidt, R. A. 1986. Snow erosion, transport and deposition. In Proc. Symposium on Snow Management for Agriculture, Steppuhn, H. and Nicholaichuk, W. (eds.). Great Plains Agricultural Council Publication, No. 120. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska, pp. 12–58.
Tabony, R. C. 1985. Relations between minimum temperature and topography in Great Britain. J. Climatol. 5(5), 503–20.Google Scholar
Troendle, C. A., and Leaf, C. E. 1981. Effects of timber harvest in the snow zone on volume and timing of water yield. In D. M. Baumgartner (ed.), Interior West Watershed Management Symposium, Pullman: Washington State University, pp. 231–43.
Tuller, S. E. 1973. Microclimatic variations in a downtown urban environment. Geogr. Annal. A 54, 123–35.Google Scholar
Verpoorter, C. et al. 2014. A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6396–6402. doi:10.1002/2014GL060641.Google Scholar
Vuglinsky, V. S. 2002. Ice events on the Siberian rivers. Formation and variability. In Squires, V., and Langhorne, P (eds.), Ice in the environment. Vol.1. Proc. 16thIAHR Int. Sympos. on Ice. Dunedin, New Zealand: Int. Assoc. Hydraulic Engin. Res, pp. 59–66.
Warren, S. G. 1982. Optical properties of snow. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 67–89.Google Scholar
Warren, S. G., and Wiscombe, W. J. 1980. A model for the spectral albedo of snow. II. Snow containing atmospheric aerosols.J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 2734–45.Google Scholar
Wendler, G. 1971. An estimate of the heat balance of a valley and hill station in central Alaska. J. Appl. Met. 10, 684–93.Google Scholar
Wetzel, R. G. 2001. Limnology: Lake and river ecosystems, 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zaratti, F. et al. 2003. Erythemally weighted UV variations at two high altitude locations. J. Geophys. Res. 108(D9), 4263, 1–6.Google Scholar
www.waterencyclopedia.com/Hy-La/Lakes-Physical-Processes.html#ixzz36QaPLOSL

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×