Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:23:32.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter J1 - Frequencies and distances

from Part J - Nuclear magnetic resonance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Igor N. Serdyuk
Affiliation:
Institute of Protein Research, Moscow
Nathan R. Zaccai
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Joseph Zaccai
Affiliation:
Institut de Biologie Structurale, Grenoble
Get access

Summary

Historical review

1924

W. Pauli proposed the theoretical basis for NMR spectroscopy. He suggested that certain atomic nuclei have properties of spin and magnetic moment and, as a consequence, exposure to a magnetic field leads to splitting of their energy levels. W. Gerlach and O. Stern observed the splitting in atomic beam experiments, providing proof for the existence of nuclear magnetic moments.

1938

I. I. Rabi and colleagues first observed NMR by applying electromagnetic radiation in atomic beam experiments. Energy was absorbed at a sharply defined frequency, causing a small but measurable deflection of the beam. Rabi received the Nobel prize for physics in 1944.

1946

Research groups led by F. Bloch and E. M. Purcell reported the observation of proton NMR in liquid water and solid paraffin wax. Bloch and Purcell shared the 1953 Nobel prize for physics.

1946

F. Bloch suggested a new method of excitation using a short radio-frequency pulse and in 1949 E. L. Hahn showed that this did indeed produce a free precession signal. Hahn also established that pulse sequences could be used to generate additional information in the form of a spin echo. For many years, however, these methods were of little use to chemists because of the complexity of the signal obtained. In 1956, I. J. Lowe and R. E. Norberg pointed out that the time-domain signal and the frequency-domain spectrum are related by Fourier transformation. The first high-resolution multichannel Fourier transform NMR spectrum was measured by R. R. Ernst and W. A. Anderson.

Type
Chapter
Information
Methods in Molecular Biophysics
Structure, Dynamics, Function
, pp. 971 - 999
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jeener, J. (1996). In Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Vol. 1. Eds. Grant, D. M. and Harris, R. K.. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Tinoco, I. Jr., Sauer, K., and Wang, J. C. (1998). Physical Chemistry. Principles and Applications in Biological Science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
King, R. W., and Williams, K. R. (1989). The Fourier transform in chemistry. Part 1 Nuclear magnetic resonance: introduction. J. Chem. Education. 66, A213–A219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoog, D. A., Holler, F. J., and Nieman, T. A. (1995). Principle of Instrumental Analysis, Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1983). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Pitman.Google Scholar
Hore, P. J. (1995). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jeener, J. (1996). In Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Vol. 1. Eds. Grant, D. M. and Harris, R. K.. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Tinoco, I. Jr., Sauer, K., and Wang, J. C. (1998). Physical Chemistry. Principles and Applications in Biological Science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
King, R. W., and Williams, K. R. (1989). The Fourier transform in chemistry. Part 1 Nuclear magnetic resonance: introduction. J. Chem. Education. 66, A213–A219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoog, D. A., Holler, F. J., and Nieman, T. A. (1995). Principle of Instrumental Analysis, Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1983). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Pitman.Google Scholar
Hore, P. J. (1995). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×