Book contents
- Memory and Intertextuality in Renaissance Literature
- Memory and Intertextuality in Renaissance Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Note on texts
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Part I Implicit and explicit poetic memory
- Part II Intertextuality, forgetting, and the schema
- Select bibliography
- Index
- References
Select bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Book contents
- Memory and Intertextuality in Renaissance Literature
- Memory and Intertextuality in Renaissance Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Note on texts
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Part I Implicit and explicit poetic memory
- Part II Intertextuality, forgetting, and the schema
- Select bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Memory and Intertextuality in Renaissance Literature , pp. 242 - 253Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Select bibliography
Ayres, Philip J., ‘The Nature of Jonson’s Roman History’, English Literary Renaissance, 16 (1986), 166–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babuts, Nicolae, The Dynamics of the Metaphorical Field: A Cognitive View of Literature (Newark: University of Delaware Press, and London: Associated University Presses, 1992).Google Scholar
Baddeley, Alan, Human Memory: Theory and Practice, rev. edn (Hove: Psychology Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W., On the Literary Genetics of Shakespeare’s Sonnets (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1950).Google Scholar
Barfoot, C. C., ‘News from the Roman Empire: Hearsay, Soothsay, Myth and History in Antony and Cleopatra’, in Reclamations of Shakespeare, ed. Hoenselaars, A. J. (Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994), 105–28.Google Scholar
Barroll, J. Leeds, Shakespearean Tragedy: Genre, Tradition, and Change in ‘Antony and Cleopatra’ (Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1984).Google Scholar
Bartlett, Frederic C., Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (Cambridge University Press, 1932).Google Scholar
Berry, C., Shanks, D., Li, S., Rains, L., and Henson, R. N., ‘Can “Pure” Implicit Memory Be Isolated? A Test of a Single-System Model of Recognition and Repetition Priming’, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 64 (2010), 241–55.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann, ‘Note Taking as an Art of Transmission’, Critical Inquiry, 31 (2004), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxton, T. A., ‘Investigating Dissociations among Memory Measures: Support for a Transfer Appropriate Processing Framework’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15 (1989), 657–68.Google Scholar
Bloom, Charles P., ‘The Roles of Schemata in Memory for Text’, Discourse Processes, 11 (1988), 305–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Harold, The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (New York: Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret A., The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2nd edn (London: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehrer, Bruce, ‘Jonson’s Catiline and Anti-Sallustian Trends in Renaissance Humanist Historiography’, Studies in Philology, 94 (1997), 85–102.Google Scholar
Bolzoni, Lina, La stanza della memoria: Modelli letterari e iconografici nell’età della stampa (Turin: Einaudi, 1995).Google Scholar
Bowers, Jeffrey S., and Marsolek, Chad J., eds., Rethinking Implicit Memory (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon, The Classics and English Renaissance Poetry: Three Case Studies (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon Petrarchan Love and the Continental Renaissance (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Braden, Gordon ‘Shakespeare, Plutarch, and the Alpha Males’, in Shakespeare and the Classics, ed. Martindale, Charles and Taylor, A. B. (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, Gordon ‘Wyatt and Petrarch: Italian Fashion at the Court of Henry VIII’, Annali d’Italianistica, 22 (2004), 237–65.Google Scholar
Brewer, William F., and Nakamura, Glenn V., ‘The Nature and Function of Schemas’, in Handbook of Social Cognition, ed. Wyer, Robert S. and Srull, Thomas K.. 3 vols. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1984), vol. i, 119–60.Google Scholar
Burrow, Colin, ‘Shakespeare and Humanistic Culture’, in Shakespeare and the Classics, ed. Martindale, Charles and Taylor, Anthony Brian (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Laurie T., and Berry, Dianne C., ‘Implicit Memory: Intention and Awareness Revisited’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5 (2001), 192–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carruthers, Mary J., The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture (Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary J., The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400–1200 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Casey, Edward S., Remembering: A Phenomenological Study (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Cave, Terence, The Cornucopian Text: Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick, Reading Sixteenth-Century Poetry (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy, ‘Intrinsic Content, Active Memory, and the Extended Mind’, Analysis, 65 (2005), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy, Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy, and Chalmers, David, ‘The Extended Mind’, Analysis, 58 (1998), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Jay, and Rothstein, Eric, ‘Figures in the Corpus: Theories of Influence and Intertextuality’, in Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History, ed. Clayton, Jay and Rothstein, Eric (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991), 3–36.Google Scholar
Cleeremans, A., ‘Conscious and Unconscious Processes in Cognition’, in The International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioural Sciences, ed. Smelser, Neil J. and Bates, Paul B. (Oxford: Elsevier, 2001), 2554–9.Google Scholar
Cohen, David, Searching Shakespeare: Studies in Cultural Authority (University of Toronto Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, Gian Biagio, The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, ed. Segal, Charles (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Cook, Amy, Shakespearean Neuroplay: Reinvigorating the Study of Dramatic Texts and Performance through Cognitive Science (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Bradin, ‘Shakespeare’s Narcissus, Sonnet’s Echo’, in The Forms of Renaissance Thought: New Essays in Literature and Culture, ed. Barkan, Leonard, Cormack, Bradin, and Keilen, Sean (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 127–49.Google Scholar
Craik, Fergus I. M., Moscovitch, Morris, and McDowd, Joan M., ‘Contributions of Surface and Conceptual Information to Performance on Implicit and Explicit Memory Tasks’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20 (1994), 864–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Crane, Mary Thomas, ‘“His Owne Style”: Voice and Writing in Jonson’s Poems’, Criticism, 32 (1990), 31–50.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas, Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England (Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas, Shakespeare’s Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory (Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas, ‘Roman Worlds: Egyptian Earth: Cognitive Difference and Empire in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, Comparative Drama, 43 (2009), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas, and Richardson, Alan, ‘Literary Studies and Cognitive Science: Towards a New Interdisciplinarity’, Mosaic, 32.2 (1999), 123–40.Google Scholar
Cummings, Robert M., ‘Liberty and History in Jonson’s Invitation to Supper’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 40 (2000), 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, Kurt, Marking the Mind: A History of Memory (Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Neva, JoAnn, ‘Reflecting Lesser Lights: The Imitation of Minor Writers in the Renaissance’, Renaissance Quarterly, 42 (1989), 449–79.Google Scholar
Draaisma, Douwe, Metaphors of Memory: A History of Ideas about the Mind, trans. Vincent, Paul (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Dubrow, Heather, ‘Shakespeare’s Undramatic Monologues: Toward a Reading of the Sonnets’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 32 (1981), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrow, Heather, Captive Victors: Shakespeare’s Narrative Poems and Sonnets (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Edmunds, Lowell, Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Engel, William E., ‘Mnemonic Criticism and Renaissance Literature: A Manifesto’, Connotations, 1 (1991), 12–33.Google Scholar
Engel, William E., Mapping Mortality: The Persistence of Memory and Melancholy in Early Modern England (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Estrin, Barbara L., Laura: Uncovering Gender and Genre in Wyatt, Donne, and Marvell (Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Evans, Robert C., Habits of Mind: Evidence and Effects of Ben Jonson’s Reading (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Fara, Patricia, and Patterson, Karalyn, eds., Memory (Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, Charles, Pieces of Light: The New Science of Memory (London: Profile, 2012).Google Scholar
Fleischman, Debra A., Vaidya, Chandan J., Lange, Kelly L., and Gabrieli, John D. E., ‘A Dissociation between Perceptual Explicit and Implicit Memory Processes’, Brain and Cognition, 35 (1997), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, R. M., and Cleeremans, A., eds., Implicit Learning and Consciousness: An Empirical, Philosophical and Computational Consensus in the Making (Hove: Psychology Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding (Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Gillespie, Stuart, English Translation and Classical Reception: Towards a New Literary History (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, Peter, and Ryan, Lee, ‘Transfer-Appropriate Processing for Implicit and Explicit Memory’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16 (1990), 978–92.Google Scholar
Green, David C., Plutarch Revisited: A Study of Shakespeare’s Last Roman Tragedies and Their Source, Jacobean Drama Studies, 78 (Salzburg: Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 1979).Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M., The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Greene, Thomas M., ‘Pitiful Thrivers: Failed Husbandry in the Sonnets’, in Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, ed. Parker, Patricia and Hartman, Geoffrey (New York and London: Methuen, 1985), 230–44.Google Scholar
Hammond, Paul, Dryden and the Traces of Classical Rome (Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanford, James H., ‘The Pastoral Elegy and Milton’s Lycidas’, in Milton’s Lycidas: The Tradition and the Poem, ed. Patrides, C. A. (New York: Cole, Rinehart and Winston, 1961), 27–55.Google Scholar
Hardy, Barbara, ‘Shakespeare’s Narrative: Acts of Memory’, Essays in Criticism, 39 (1989), 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Jocelyn, Jane Austen’s Art of Memory (Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, F. Elizabeth, ‘Cognitive Linguistics: The Experiential Dynamic of Metaphor’, Mosaic, 28.1 (1995), 1–23.Google Scholar
Hart, F. Elizabeth, ‘The Epistemology of Cognitive Literary Studies’, Philosophy and Literature, 25 (2001), 314–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, C. A. Gordon, and Tulving, Endel, ‘Is Priming in Fragment Completion Based on a “Traceless” Memory System?’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15 (1989), 941–56.Google Scholar
Heale, Elizabeth, Wyatt, Surrey, and Early Tudor Poetry (London and New York: Longman, 1998).Google Scholar
Heffner, Ray L., Jr., ‘The Messengers in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, ELH, 43 (1976), 154–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, R. N., and Gagnepain, P., ‘Predictive, Interactive Multiple Memory Systems’, Hippocampus, 20 (2010), 1315–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinds, Stephen, Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Hiscock, Andrew, Reading Memory in Early Modern Literature (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höfele, Andreas, ‘Twentieth-Century Intertextuality and the Reading of Shakespeare’s Sources’, Poetica: An International Journal of Linguistic-Literary Studies, 48 (1997), Special Issue: Shakespeare’s Plutarch, ed. McGrail, Mary Ann, 211–27.Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm, Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists (New York and London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm, and Pandit, Lalita, ‘Morsels and Modules: On Embodying Cognition in Shakespeare’s Plays’, College Literature, 33 (2006), 1–13.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter, ‘On the Gravy Train: Shakespeare, Memory and Forgetting’, in Shakespeare, Memory and Performance, ed. Holland, Peter (Cambridge University Press, 2006), 207–34.Google Scholar
Holyoake, S. John, ‘Montaigne’s Attitude to Memory’, French Studies, 25 (1971), 257–70.Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J., ‘Shakespeare’s Plutarch’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 10 (1959), 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourihan, Kathleen L., and MacLeod, Colin M., ‘Capturing Conceptual Implicit Memory: The Time It Takes to Produce an Association’, Memory and Cognition, 35 (2007), 1187–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacoby, Larry L., ‘A Process Dissociation Framework: Separating Automatic from Intentional Uses of Memory’, Journal of Memory and Language, 30 (1991), 513–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Larry L., ‘Measuring Recollection: Strategic versus Automatic Influences of Associative Context’, Attention and Performance, 15 (1994), 661–79.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Larry L., ‘Invariance in Automatic Influences of Memory: Toward a User’s Guide for the Process-Dissociation Procedure’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24 (1998), 3–26.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Larry L. and Kelley, Colleen, ‘Unconscious Influences of Memory: Dissociations and Automaticity’, in The Neuropsychology of Consciousness , ed. Milner, A. D. and Rugg, M. D. (London: Academic Press, 1992), 201–33.Google Scholar
Jeanneret, Michel, ‘The Renaissance and Its Ancients: Dismembering and Devouring’, Modern Language Notes, 110 (1995), 1043–53.Google Scholar
Jones, Ann Rosalind, and Stallybrass, Peter, Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jones, Gregory V., ‘Fragmentation in Human Memory’, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1975.Google Scholar
Jones, Gregory V., ‘A Fragmentation Hypothesis of Memory: Cued Recall of Pictures and of Sequential Position’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105 (1976), 277–93.Google Scholar
Jones, Gregory V., ‘Fragment and Schema Models for Recall’, Memory and Cognition, 12 (1984), 250–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalas, Rayna, Frame, Glass, Verse: The Technology of Poetic Invention in the English Renaissance (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Dennis, Melodious Tears: The English Funeral Elegy from Spenser to Milton (Oxford University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinney, Arthur F., Shakespeare’s Webs: Networks of Meaning in Renaissance Drama (New York and London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Kinney, Arthur F., Aristotle’s Legacy and Shakespeare’s Drama (London and New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd, Bound to Read: Compilations, Collections, and the Making of Renaissance Literature (Philadephia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. Roudiez, Leon S., trans. Gora, Thomas, Jardine, Alice, and Roudiez, Leon S. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar
Lachmann, Renate, Memory and Literature: Intertextuality in Russian Modernism, trans. Sellars, Roy and Wall, Anthony (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark, Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark, More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor (University of Chicago Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Rhodri, ‘A Kind of Sagacity: Francis Bacon, the Ars Memoriae and the Pursuit of Natural Knowledge’, Intellectual History Review, 19 (2009), 155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Rhodri, ‘Hamlet, Metaphor, and Memory’, Studies in Philology, 109 (2012), 609–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieb, Michael, ‘“Yet Once More”: The Formulaic Opening of Lycidas’, Milton Quarterly, 12 (1978), 23–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, Raphael, Ovid’s Changing Worlds: English Metamorphoses, 1567–1632 (Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, Raphael, Shakespeare, Rhetoric and Cognition (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, Raphael, ‘Recognition in Cymbeline’ in Late Shakespeare: 1608–1613, ed. Power, Andrew and Loughnane, Rory (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, Raphael, ‘The Shakespearean Grasp’, Cambridge Quarterly, 42 (2013), 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Colin M., ‘Word Context During Initial Exposure Influences Degree of Priming in Word Fragment Completion’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15 (1989), 398–406.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne, ‘A Pragmatics for Interpreting Shakespeare’s Sonnets 1 to 20: Dialogue Scripts and Erasmian Intertexts’, in Methods in Historical Pragmatics, ed. Fitzmaurice, Susan and Taavitsainen, Irma (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007), 167–83.Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean Matter, Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1984).Google Scholar
Marshall, Cynthia, ‘Shakespeare, Crossing the Rubicon’, Shakespeare Survey, 53 (2000), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, Charles, Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception (Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles, ‘Shakespeare’s Ovid, Ovid’s Shakespeare’, in Shakespeare’s Ovid: The Metamorphoses in the Plays and Poems, ed. Taylor, Anthony Brian (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 198–215.Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles, ‘Milton’s Classicism’, in The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature, ed. Hopkins, David and Martindale, Charles (Oxford University Press, 2012), 53–90.Google Scholar
Martindale, Charles, and Burrow, Colin, ‘Clapham’s Narcissus: A Pre-Text for Shakespeare’s Venus and Adonis?’ English Literary Renaissance, 22 (1992), 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matussek, Peter, ‘Literary Recollection: The Ends of Intertextuality’, in Intertextuality, ed. Plett, Heinrich (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991), 399–408.Google Scholar
Maus, Katharine Eisaman, Ben Jonson and the Roman Frame of Mind (Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
McConachie, Bruce, ‘Falsifiable Theories for Theatre and Performance Studies’, Theatre Journal, 59 (2007), 553–77.Google Scholar
McConachie, Bruce, Engaging Audiences: A Cognitive Approach to Spectating in the Theatre (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConachie, Bruce A., and Hart, F. Elizabeth, eds., Performance and Cognition: Theatre Studies and the Cognitive Turn (New York: Routledge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Kathleen B., ‘The Persistence of False Memories in List Recall’, Journal of Memory and Language, 35 (1996), 212–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Jerome, ‘An Interview with Jerome McGann’, Cambridge Quarterly, 22 (1993), 355–69.Google Scholar
McGrail, Mary Ann, ‘From Plagiaries to Sources’, Poetica: An International Journal of Linguistic-Literary Studies, 48 (1997), Special Issue: Shakespeare’s Plutarch, ed. Mary Ann McGrail, 169–85.Google Scholar
Melton, Arthur W., and Irwin, Jean M., ‘The Influence of Degree of Interpolated Learning on Retroactive Inhibition and the Overt Transfer of Specific Responses’, American Journal of Psychology, 53 (1940), 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, Elizabeth, Homer and the Resources of Memory: Some Applications of Cognitive Theory to the Iliad and Odyssey (Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miola, Robert S., Seven Types of Intertextuality’, in Shakespeare and Intertextuality: The Transition of Culture between Italy and England in the Early Modern Period, ed. Marrapodi, Michele (Rome: Bulzoni, 2000), 23–38.Google Scholar
Moss, Ann, Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moul, Victoria, ‘Ben Jonson’s Poetaster: Classical Translation and the Location of Cultural Authority’, Translation and Literature, 15 (2006), 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moul, Victoria, Jonson, Horace, and the Classical Tradition (Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Jean M., and Johnson, Nancy S., ‘Remembrance of Things Parsed: Story Structure and Recall’, Cognitive Psychology, 9 (1977), 111–51.Google Scholar
Mulryan, John, ‘Milton’s Lycidas and the Italian Mythographers: Some Suggestive Parallels in Their Treatment of Mythological Subjects’, Milton Quarterly, 15 (1981), 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulryan, John, ‘Through a Glass Darkly’: Milton’s Reinvention of the Mythological Tradition (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Mulryan, John, ‘Jonson’s Classicism’, in The Cambridge Companion to Ben Jonson, ed. Harp, Richard and Stewart, Stanley (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 163–74.Google Scholar
Newton, Allyson P., ‘At “the Very Heart of Loss”: Shakespeare’s Enobarbus and the Rhetoric of Remembering’, in Renaissance Papers 1995, ed. Williams, George Walton and Baines, Barbara J. (Raleigh, NC: Southeastern Renaissance Conference, 1996), 81–91.Google Scholar
Oloffson, Ulrich, and Nyberg, Lars, ‘Determinants of Word Fragment Completion’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 36 (1995), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgel, Stephen, ‘The Renaissance Artist as Plagiarist’, ELH, 48 (1981), 476–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Simon, and Stern, Tiffany, Shakespeare in Parts (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfitt, G. A. E., ‘The Nature of Translation in Ben Jonson’s Poetry’, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, 13 (1973), 344–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Annabel, ‘“Roman-cast Similitude”: Ben Jonson and the English Use of Roman History’, in Rome in the Renaissance: The City and the Myth, ed. Ramsey, P. A. (Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, 1982), 381–94.Google Scholar
Pigman, George W., III, ‘Versions of Imitation in the Renaissance’, Renaissance Quarterly, 33 (1980), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Lois, ‘“Nobody’s Perfect”: Actors’ Memories and Shakespeare’s Plays of the 1590s’, Shakespeare Survey, 42 (1990), 85–97.Google Scholar
Prince, F. T., ‘The Italian Element in Lycidas’, in Milton’s Lycidas: The Tradition and the Poem, ed. Patrides, C. A. (New York: Cole, Rinehart and Winston, 1961), 153–66.Google Scholar
Reichert, John F., ‘Sonnet 20 and Erasmus’ “Epistle to Perswade a Yong Gentleman to Marriage”’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 16 (1965), 238–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revard, Stella P., Milton and the Tangles of Neaera’s Hair: The Making of the 1645 ‘Poems’ (Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Reynolds, Matthew, The Poetry of Translation: From Chaucer and Petrarch to Homer and Logue (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Alan, ‘Studies of Literature and Cognition: A Field Map’, in The Work of Fiction: Cognition, Culture, and Complexity, ed. Richardson, Alan and Spolsky, Ellen (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), 1–29.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, Memory, History, Forgetting, trans. Blamey, Kathleen and Pellauer, David (University of Chicago Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, John, ‘“Character” in Plutarch and Shakespeare: Brutus, Julius Caesar, and Mark Antony’, in Shakespeare and the Classics, ed. Martindale, Charles and Taylor, A. B. (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 173–87.Google Scholar
Roediger, Henry L., III, and Blaxton, Teresa A., ‘Effects of Varying Modality, Surface Features, and Retention Interval on Priming in Word-Fragment Completion’, Memory and Cognition, 15 (1987), 377–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, Henry L., III, and Wertsch, James V., ‘Creating a New Discipline of Memory Studies’, Memory Studies, 1 (2008), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, Henry L., III, McDermott, Kathleen B., and Robinson, K. J., ‘The Role of Associative Processes in Creating False Memories’, in Theories of Memory II , ed. Conway, M. A., Gathercole, S. E., and Cornoldi, C. (Hove: Psychological Press, 1998), 187–245.Google Scholar
Roediger, Henry L., III, Watson, Jason M., McDermott, Kathleen B., and Gallo, David A., ‘Factors that Determine False Recall: A Multiple Regression Analysis’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8 (2001), 385–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, George E., Distinguishing Jonson: Imitation, Rivalry, and the Direction of a Dramatic Career (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Rubin, David C., Memory in Oral Traditions: The Cognitive Psychology of Epic, Ballads, and Counting-out Rhymes (Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E., ‘Notes on a Schema for Stories’, in Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, ed. Bobrow, Daniel G. and Collins, Allan (New York, San Francisco, and London: Academic Press, 1975), pp. 211–36.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E., ‘Schemata and the Cognitive System’, in Handbook of Social Cognition, ed. Wyer, Robert S. and Srull, Thomas K.. 3 vols. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1984), vol. i, 161–88.Google Scholar
Ruprecht, Hans-Georg, ‘The Reconstruction of Intertextuality’, in Intertextuality, ed. Plett, Heinrich (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991), 60–77.Google Scholar
Sansone, David, ‘How Milton Reads: The Scripture, the Classics and That Two-Handed Engine’, Modern Philology, 103 (2006), 332–57.Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L., ed., Memory Distortion: How Minds, Brains, and Societies Reconstruct the Past (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L., Searching for Memory: The Brain, the Mind, and the Past (New York: Basic Books, 1996).Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L., The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2001).Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L., and Graf, Peter, ‘Effects of Elaborative Processing on Implicit and Explicit Memory for New Associations’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12 (1986), 432–44.Google Scholar
Shanks, David R., and St John, Mark F., ‘Characteristics of Dissociable Human Learning Systems’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 17 (1994), 367–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, David R., Green, Robin E. A., and Koloday, Jonathan A., ‘A Critical Examination of the Evidence for Unconscious (Implicit) Learning’, Attention and Performance, 15 (1994), 837–60.Google Scholar
Sims, James H., ‘Perdita’s “Flowers o’ th’ Spring” and “Vernal Flowers” in “Lycidas”’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 22 (1971), 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, Ellen, Gaps in Nature: Literary Interpretation and the Modular Mind (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Spolsky, Ellen, Satisfying Skepticism: Embodied Knowledge in the Early Modern World (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001).Google Scholar
Spolsky, Ellen, Word vs Image: Cognitive Hunger in Shakespeare’s England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar
Stamatakis, Chris, Sir Thomas Wyatt and the Rhetoric of Rewriting: ‘Turning the Word’ (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany, Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan (Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Sullivan, Garrett A., Jr, Memory and Forgetting in English Renaissance Drama: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Webster (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Garrett A., ‘Voicing the Young Man: Memory, Forgetting, and Subjectivity in the Procreation Sonnets’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Sonnets, ed. Schoenfeldt, Michael (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007), 331–42.Google Scholar
Sutton, John, Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R., Buratto, L., and Henson, R. N., ‘Behavioural and Neural Evidence for Masked Conceptual Priming of Recollection’, Cortex, 49 (2013), 1511–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, Karla, ‘Writers of the Italian Renaissance’, in The Oxford History of Literary Translation in English, ed. France, Peter and Gillespie, Stuart (Oxford University Press, 2008), vol. i: To 1550, ed. Roger Ellis, 390–406.Google Scholar
Thomas, Richard F., Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Thomson, Patricia, ‘Wyatt and the Petrarchan Commentators’, Review of English Studies, 10 (1959), 225–33.Google Scholar
Thomson, Patricia, Sir Thomas Wyatt and His Background (Stanford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Thorndyke, Perry W., ‘Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse’, Cognitive Psychology, 9 (1977), 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndyke, Perry W., and Yekovich, Frank R., ‘A Critique of Schema-Based Theories of Human Story Memory’, Poetics, 9 (1980), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, Jeffrey P., Reingold, Eyal M., and Jacoby, Larry L., ‘Towards a Redefinition of Implicit Memory: Process Dissociations Following Elaborative Learning and Self-Generation’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20 (1994), 290–303.Google Scholar
Tribble, Evelyn B., ‘“The Dark Backward and Abysm of Time”: The Tempest and Memory’, College Literature, 33 (2006), 152–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribble, Evelyn B., Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribble, Evelyn, and Keene, Nicholas, Cognitive Ecologies and the History of Remembering: Religion, Education and Memory in Early Modern England (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribble, Evelyn, and Sutton, John, ‘Cognitive Ecology as a Framework for Shakespearean Studies’, Shakespeare Studies, 39 (2011), 94–103.Google Scholar
Tribble, Evelyn, and Sutton, John, ‘Minds in and out of Time: Memory, Embodied Skill, Anachronism, and Performance’, Textual Practice, 26 (2012), 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudeau-Clayton, Margaret, ‘Scenes of Translation in Jonson and Shakespeare: Poetaster, Hamlet, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream’, Translation and Literature, 11 (2002), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, Endel, ‘How Many Memory Systems Are There?’ American Psychoanalyst, 40 (1985), 385–98.Google Scholar
Turner, Mark, Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science (Princeton University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark, The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities (New York: Basic Books, 2002).Google Scholar
Turner, Mark, and Fauconnier, Gilles, ‘A Mechanism of Creativity’, Poetics Today, 20 (1999), 397–418.Google Scholar
Underwood, Benton J., ‘Interference and Forgetting’, Psychological Review, 64 (1957), 49–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Kesteren, M. T. R., Ruiter, D. J., Fernández, G., and Henson, R. N., ‘How Schema and Novelty Augment Memory Formation’, Trends in Neurosciences, 35 (2012), 211–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Tress, Heather, Poetic Memory: Allusion in the Poetry of Callimachus and the ‘Metamorphoses’ of Ovid (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, Raymond B., ‘Shakespeare’s Sonnet 15 and the Art of Memory’, in The Rhetoric of Renaissance Poetry from Wyatt to Milton, ed. Sloan, Thomas O. and Waddington, Raymond B. (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1974), 96–122.Google Scholar
Wägenbaur, Thomas, ‘Memory and Recollection: The Cognitive and Literary Model’, in The Poetics of Memory, ed. Wägenbaur, Thomas (Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 1998), 3–22.Google Scholar
Walker, Greg, Writing under Tyranny: English Literature and the Henrician Reformation (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Andrew, Virgil’s Schoolboys: The Poetics of Pedagogy in Renaissance England (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Joseph, ‘Wandering Eyes: Jonson’s Catiline and the Problem of Sight’, Renaissance Drama, 41 (2013), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Amanda, ‘“Full Character’d”: Competing Forms of Memory in Shakespeare’s Sonnets’, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Sonnets, ed. Schoenfeldt, Michael (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007), 343–60.Google Scholar
Wayne, Don E., ‘Mediation and Contestation: English Classicism from Sidney to Jonson’, Criticism, 25 (1983), 211–37.Google Scholar
Wentersdorf, Karl P., ‘The Thematic Significance of the Flower Catalogue in Milton’s “Lycidas”’, ELH, 47 (1980), 500–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentersdorf, Karl P., ‘Allusion and Theme in the Third Movement of Milton’s Lycidas’, Modern Philology, 83 (1986), 275–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, Lina Perkins, Shakespeare’s Memory Theatre: Recollection, Properties, and Character (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Wilson, Emily, ‘Quantum mutatus ab illo: Moments of Change and Recognition in Tasso and Milton’, in Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin by Former Pupils, ed. Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F., and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (Oxford University Press, 2006), 273–99.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, Dawn, and Moscovitch, Morris, ‘Stochastic Independence between Two Implicit Memory Tasks’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15 (1989), 22–30.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair, ‘Politics in Catiline: Jonson and His Sources’, in Re-Presenting Ben Jonson: Text, History, Performance, ed. Butler, Martin (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999), 152–73.Google Scholar
Yeo, Richard, ‘Notebooks as Memory Aids: Precepts and Practices in Early Modern England’, Memory Studies, 1 (2008), 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonelinas, A. P., and Jacoby, L. L., ‘The Process-Dissociation Approach Two Decades Later: Convergence, Boundary Conditions, and New Directions’, Memory and Cognition, 40 (2012), 663–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zagorin, Perez, ‘Sir Thomas Wyatt and the Court of Henry VIII: The Courtier’s Ambivalence’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 23 (1993), 113–41.Google Scholar
Zunshine, Lisa, ed., Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, Lisa, The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar