Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andreasen, N. J. & Powers, P. S. (1974). Overinclusive thinking in mania and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 452–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreasen, N. J. & Powers, P. S. (1975). Creativity and psychosis. An examination of conceptual style. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 70–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M. & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Atre-Vaidya, N., Taylor, M. A., Seidenberg, M., Reed, R., Perrine, A. & Glick-Oberwise, F. (1998). Cognitive deficits, psychopathology, and psychosocial functioning in bipolar mood disorder. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 11, 120–126.Google ScholarPubMed

Aylward, E., Walker, E. & Bettes, B. (1984). Intelligence in schizophrenia: meta-analysis of the research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10, 430–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayres, J. J. B., Albert, M. & Bombace, J. C. (1987). Extending conditioned stimuli before versus after unconditioned stimuli: implication for real-time models of conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 168–181.Google Scholar

Ayres, J. J. B., Philbin, D., Cassidy, S. & Belling, L. (1992). Some parameters of latent inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 23, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, A. G. (1974). Conditioned inhibition is not the symmetrical opposite of conditioned excitation: a test of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Learning and Motivation, 5, 396–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, A. G. & Mercier, P. (1982). Extinction of the context and latent inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 13, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, A. G., Haskins, C. E. & Hall, G. (1990). Stimulus generalization decrement in latent inhibition to a compound following exposure to the elements of the compound. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, A. G., Mercier, P., Gabel, J. & Baker, P. A. (1981). Contextual conditioning and the US preexposure effect in conditioned fear. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 109–128.Google ScholarPubMed

Barela, P. (1999). Theoretical mechanisms underlying the trial-spacing effect in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 177–195.Google ScholarPubMed

Barnet, R. C., Grahame, N. J. & Miller, R. R. (1993). Temporal encoding as a determinant of blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 327–341.Google ScholarPubMed

Baruch, I., Hemsley, D. & Gray, J. A. (1988). Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 176, 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckers, T., Houwer, J., Pineno, O. & Miller, R. R. (2005). Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 238–249.Google ScholarPubMed

Beckers, T., Miller, R. R., Houwer, J. & Urushihara, K. (2006). Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 92–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bennett, C. H., Maldonado, A. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1995). Learned irrelevance is not the sum of exposure to CS and US. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48B, 117–128.Google Scholar

Berger, T. W. & Orr, W. B. (1983). Hippocampectomy selectively disrupts discrimination reversal conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Behavioral Brain Research, 8, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berger, T. W. & Thompson, R. F. (1978a). Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. I. The hippocampus. Brain Research, 145, 323–346.Google ScholarPubMed

Berger, T. W. & Thompson, R. F. (1978b). Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. II. Septum and mammillary bodies. Brain Research, 156, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berger, T. W. & Thompson, R. F. (1982). Hippocampal cellular plasticity during extinction of classically conditioned nictitating membrane behavior. Behavioral Brain Research, 4, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berger, T. W., Clark, G. A. & Thompson, R. F. (1980). Learning dependent neuronal responses recorded from limbic system brain structures during classical conditioning. Physiological Psychology, 8, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, T. W., Rinaldi, P. C., Weisz, D. J. & Thompson, R. F. (1983). Single unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response. Journal of Neurophysiology, 50, 1197–1219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berthier, N. E. & Moore, J. W. (1990). Activity of deep cerebellar nuclear cells during classical conditioning of nictitating membrane extension in rabbits. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Best, M. R., Gemberling, G. A. & Johnson, P. E. (1979). Disrupting the conditioned stimulus preexposure effect in flavor aversion learning: effects of interoceptive distractor manipulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 321–334.Google ScholarPubMed

Blaisdell, A. P., Denniston, J. C. & Miller, R. R. (1998). Temporal encoding as a determinant of overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 72–83.Google ScholarPubMed

Blaisdell, A. P., Gunther, L. & Miller, R. (1999). Recovery from blocking achieved by extinguishing the blocking CS. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaisdell, A., Bristol, A., Gunther, L. & Miller, R. (1998). Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: further support for the comparator hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 335–251.Google ScholarPubMed

Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J. & Waldmann, M. R. (2006). Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 1020–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blough, D. S. (1975). Steady state data and a quatitative model of operant generalization and discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Bheavior Processes, 104, 3–21.Google Scholar

Boden, M. A. (1999). Computer models of creativity. In Handbook of Creativity, ed. Stenberg, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bonardi, C. & Hall, G. (1994a). Occasion-setting training renders stimuli more similar: acquired equivalence between the targets of feature positive discriminations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 63–82.Google Scholar

Bonardi, C. & Hall, G. (1994b). A search for blocking of occasion setting using a nonexplicit training procedure. Learning and Motivation, 25, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonardi, C., Hall, G. & Ong, S. Y. (2005). Analysis of the learned irrelevance effect in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 58B, 141–162.Google Scholar

Bottjer, S. W. (1982). Conditioned approach and withdrawal behavior in pigeons: effects of a novel extraneous stimulus during acquisition and extinction. Learning and Motivation, 13, 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boughner, R. L. & Papini, M. R. (2006). Appetitive latent inhibition in rats: preexposure performance does not predict conditioned performance. Behavioural Processes, 72, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouton, M. E. (1984). Differential control by context in the inflation and reinstatement paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 56–74.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E. (1986). Slow reacquisition following the extinction of conditioned suppression. Learning and Motivation, 17, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bouton, M. E. (1994). Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 219–231.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 976–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bouton, M. E. & Bolles, R. C. (1979a). Role of conditioned contextual stimuli in reinstatement of extinguished fear. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 368–378.Google ScholarPubMed

Bouton, M. E. & Bolles, R. C. (1979b). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear. Learning and Motivation, 10, 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouton, M. E. & King, D. A. (1983). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: tests for the associative value of the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 248–265.Google ScholarPubMed

Bouton, M. E. & King, D. A. (1986). Effect of context on performance to conditioned stimuli with mixed histories of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 4–15.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E. & Nelson, J. B. (1994). Context-specificity of target versus feature inhibition in a feature-negative discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 51–65.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E. & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavioral Processes, 12, 333–350.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E. & Swartzentruber, D. (1989). Slow reacquisition following extinction: context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 43–53.Google Scholar

Bouton, M. E.,Woods, A. M. & Pineño, O. (2004). Occasional reinforced trials during extinction can slow the rate of rapid reacquisition. Learning and Motivation, 35, 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouton, M. E., Rosengard, C., Achenbach, G. G., Peck, C. A.et al. (1993). Effects of contextual conditioning and unconditioned stimulus presentation on performance in appetitive conditioning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 46B, 63–95.Google Scholar

Bower, G. H. & Hilgard, E. R. (1981). Theories of Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Brandon, S. E. & Wagner, A. R. (1998). Occasion setting: influences of conditioned emotional responses and configural cues. In Occasion Setting: Associative Learning and Cognition in Animals. ed. N. A. & P. C. Holland, Schmajuk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 343–382; p. xxi.Google Scholar

Brandon, S. E. & Wagner, A. R. (1991). Modulation of a discrete Pavlovian conditioned reflex by a putative emotive Pavlovian conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 299–311.Google ScholarPubMed

Brandon, S. E., Vogel, E. H. & Wagner, A. R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning. Behavioural Brain Research, 110, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brandon, S. E., Vogel, E. H. & Wagner, A. R. (2002). Computational theories of classical conditioning. In A Neuroscientist's Guide to Classical Conditioning, ed. Moore, J. W.. New York: Springer, pp. 232–310.Google Scholar

Breese, C. R., Hampson, R. E. & Deadwyler, S. A. (1989). Hippocampal place cells: stereotypy and plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 1097–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brodal, P. (1992). The central nervous system. Structure and function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brogden, W. J. (1939). Sensory pre conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, D. C. & Bouton, M. E. (1993). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates spontaneous recovery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 77–89.Google ScholarPubMed

Brooks, D. C. & Bouton, M. E. (1994). A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 366–379.Google Scholar

Brooks, D. C. & Bowker, J. L. (2001). Further evidence that conditioned inhibition is not the mechanism of an extinction cue's effect: a reinforced cue prevents spontaneous recovery. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29, 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, S. L. & Powell, D. A. (1982). Cingulate cortex: its role in Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 96, 755–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buchel, C., Morris, J., Dolan, R. J. & Friston, K. J. (1998). Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 20, 947–957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buhusi, C. V. & Schmajuk, N. A. (1996). Attention, configuration, and hippocampal function. Hippocampus, 6, 621–642.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buhusi, C. V. & Schmajuk, N. A. (1999). Timing in simple conditioning and occasion setting: a neural network approach. Behavioral Processes, 45, 33–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buhusi, C. V., Schmajuk, N. A. & Dunn, L. (1999). Haloperidol administration at preexposure may impair latent inhibition. Abstracts of the Society for Neuroscience, Miami Beach, FL.Google Scholar

Buhusi, C. V., Gray, J. A. & Schmajuk, N. A. (1998). The perplexing effects of hippocampal lesions on latent inhibition: a neural network solution. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 316–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bunsey, M. & Eichenbaum, H. (1996). Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans. Nature, 379, 255–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burch, G. S. J., Hemsley, D. R., Pavelis, C. & Corr, P. J. (2006). Personality, creativity and latent inhibition. European Journal of Personality, 20, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burkhardt, P. E., & Ayres, J. J. (1978). CS and US duration effects in one-trial simultaneous fear conditioning as assessed by conditioned suppression of licking in rats. Animal Learning & Behavior, 6, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, K. R. (1967). Spontaneous recovery: a (Hullian) non-inhibition interpretation. Psychonomic Science, 7, 389–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, R. R. & Mosteller, F. (1955). Stochastic Models for Learning. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, C. K., Blouin, A. M. & Barad, M. (2003). Temporally massed CS presentations generate more fear extinction than spaced presentations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 323–333.Google ScholarPubMed

Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campolattaro, M. M. & Freeman, J. H. (2006a). Perirhinal cortex lesions impair simultaneous but not serial feature-positive discrimination learning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 970–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campolattaro, M. M., & Freeman, J. H. (2006b). Perirhinal cortex lesions impair feature-negative discrimination. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 86, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Capaldi, E. J. (1967). A sequential theory of instrumental training. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, ed. Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T.. New York: Academic, pp. 67–156.Google Scholar

Capaldi, E. J. (1971). Memory and learning: A sequential viewpoint. In Animal Memory, eds. Honig, W. K. & James, P. H. R.. New York: Academic, pp. 111–154.Google Scholar

Carelli, R. M. & Deadwyler, S. A. (1994). A comparison of nucleus accumbens neuronal firing patterns during cocaine self-administration and water reinforcement in rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 7735–7746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carr, A. F. (1974). Latent inhibition and overshadowing in conditioned emotional response conditioning with rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 718–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B. & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cassaday, H. J., Mitchell, S. N., Williams, J. H. & Gray, J. A. (1993). 5,7-Dihydroxytryptamine lesions in the fornix-fimbria attenuate latent inhibition. BehavioralNeural Biology, 59, 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, K-H, Jarrard, L. E. & Davidson, T. L. (2003). The effects of selective ibotenate lesions of the hippocamapus on conditioned inhibition and extinction. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Channell, S. & Hall, G. (1981). Facilitation and retardation of discrimination learning after exposure to the stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 437–446.Google ScholarPubMed

Chapman, G. (1991). Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 17, 837–854.Google Scholar

Chorazyna, H. (1962). Some properties of conditioned inhibition. Acta Biologiae Experimentalis, 22, 5–13.Google ScholarPubMed

Church, R. M. (1990). A Turing test for computational and associative theories of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 10, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, R. M. & Broadbent, H. A. (1990). A connectionist model of timing. In Quantitative Models of Behavior: Neural Networks and Conditioning, ed. Commons, M. L., Grossberg, S. & Staddon, J. E. R.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 225–240.Google Scholar

Colwill, R. M. & Rescorla, R. A. (1990). Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 18, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corcoran, K. A. & Maren, S. (2004). Factors regulating the effects of hippocampal inactivation on renewal of conditional fear after extinction. Learning & Memory, 11, 598–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coutureau, E., Galani, R., Gosselin, O., Majchrzak, M. & Di Scala, G. (1999). Entorhinal but not hippocampal or subicular lesions disrupt latent inhibition in rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 72, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crowell, C. R. & Anderson, D. C. (1972). Variations in intensity, interstimulus interval, and interval between preconditioning CS exposures and conditioning with rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 79, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Csernansky, J. G. & Bardgett, M. E. (1998). Limbic cortical neuronal damage and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cunningham, C. L. (1979). Alcohol as a cue for extinction: state dependency produced by conditioned inhibition. Animal Learning and Behavior, 7, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, C. L. (1981). Association between the elements of a bivalent compound stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 425–436.Google ScholarPubMed

D'Esposito, M., Postle, B. R. & Rypma, B. (2000). Prefontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, H. B. & Daly, J. T. (1982). A mathematical model of reward and aversive nonreward: its application in over 30 appetitive learning situations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 441–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daum, I., Channon, S., Polkey, C. E. & Gray, J. A. (1991). Classical conditioning after temporal lobe lesions in man: impairment in conditional discrimination. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 396–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, T. L. (1993). The nature and function of interoceptive signals to feed: toward an integration of physiological and learning perspectives. Psychological Review, 100, 640–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, T. L. & Jarrard, L. E. (1989). Retention of concurrent conditional discriminations in rats with ibotenate lesions of hippocampus. Psychobiology, 17, 49–60.Google Scholar

Davidson, T. L. & Jarrard, L. E. (1993). A role for the hippocampus in the utilization of hunger signals. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 59, 167–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, T. L. & Rescorla, R. A. (1986). Transfer of facilitation in the rat. Animal Learning and Behavior, 14, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, T. L., McKernan, M. G. & Jarrard, L. E. (1993). Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: a challenge to configural association theory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houwer, J. & Beckers, T. (2002). Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casa, L. & Lubow, R. (2000). Super-latent inhibition with delayed conditioned taste aversion testing. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casa, L. & Lubow, R. (2002). An empirical analysis of the super-latent inhibition effect. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 112–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Casa, L. G. & Lubow, R. E. (1995). Latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion: the roles of stimulus frequency and duration, and amount of fluid ingested during preexposure. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 64, 125–132.Google ScholarPubMed

Delamater, A. R. (1997). Selective reinstatement of stimulus-outcome associations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 400–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delamater, A. R. (2004). Experimental extinction in Pavlovian conditioning: behavioural and neuroscience perspectives. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denniston, J. C., Chang, R. C. & Miller, R. R. (2003). Massive extinction treatment attenuates the renewal effect. Learning and Motivation, 34, 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denniston, J. C., Savastano, H. & Miller, R. R. (2001). The extended comparator hypothesis: learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength. In Handbook of Contemporary Learning, ed. Mowrer, R. R. & Klein, S. B.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 65–117.Google Scholar

Desmond, J. E. & Moore, J. W. (1982). A brain stem region essential for classical conditioned but not unconditioned nictitating membrane response. Physiology and Behavior, 28, 1029–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desmond, J. E. & Moore, J. W. (1988). Adaptive timing in neural networks: the conditioned response. Biological Cybernetics, 58, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Desmond, J. E. & Moore, J. W. (1991). Single-unit activity in red nucleus during the classically conditioned rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neuroscience Research, 10, 260–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Devenport, L. D. (1998). Spontaneous recovery without interference: why remembering is adaptive. Animal Learning and Behavior, 26, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeVietti, T. L. & Barrett, O. V. (1986). Latent inhibition: no effect of intertrial interval of the preexposure trials. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 453–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devinsky, O., Morrell, M. J. & Vogt, B. A. (1995). Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behavior. Brain, 118, 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickey, C. C., McCarley, R. W., Xu, M. L., Seidman, L. J., Voglmaier, M. M., Niznikiewicz, M. A., Connor, E. & Shenton, M. E. (2007). MRI abnormalities of the hippocampus and cavum septi pellucidi in females with schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 89, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dickinson, A. (1980). Contemporary Animal Learning Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dickinson, A. & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickinson, A., Hall, G.,& Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Surprise and the attenuation of blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 313–322.Google Scholar

Dickinson, A. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1978). Classical conditioning in animals. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 587–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1011–1026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DiMattia, B. D. & Kesner, R. P. (1988). Spatial cognitive maps: differential role of parietal cortex and hippocampal formation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 471–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duda, R. O. & Hart, P. E. (1973). Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Dunsmoor, J. E., Bandettini, P. A. & Knight, D. C. (2007). Impact of continuous versus intermittent CS-UCS pairing on human brain activation during Pavlovian fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121, 635–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Durlach, P. J. & Rescorla, R. A. (1980). Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-a version learning: an analysis in terms of within-compound associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 175–187.Google Scholar

Dykes, M. & McGhie, A. (1976). A comparative study of attentional strategies of schizophrenic and highly creative normal subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Falls, W. A., Miserendino, M. J. & Davis, M. (1992). Extinction of fear-potentiated startle: blockade by infusion of an NMDA antagonist into the amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 854–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fanselow, M. S. (1990). Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 264–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldon, J., Shofel, A. & Weiner, I. (1991). Latent inhibition is unaffected by direct dopamine agonists. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 38, 309–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fiorillo, C. D., Tobler, P. N. & Schultz, W. (2003). Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons. Science, 299, 1898–1902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Flaherty, A. W. (2005). Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fletcher, P. C., Anderson, J. M., Shanks, D. R., Honey, R., Carpenter, T. A., Donovan, T., Papdakis, N. & Bullmore, E. T. (2001). Responses of the human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1043–1048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frey, P. W. & Sears, R. J. (1978). Model of conditioning incorporating the Rescorla–Wagner associative axiom, a dynamic attention process, and a catastrophe rule. Psychological Review, 85, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frohardt, R. J., Guarraci, F. A. & Bouton, M. E. (2000). The effects of neurotoxic hippocampal lesions on two effects of context after fear extinction. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fuster, J. M. (1973). Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory. Journal of Neurophysiology, 36, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gabora, L. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition, October 13–16, ed. Hewett, T. & Kavanagh, T.. Loughborough University, UK, pp. 126–133.Google Scholar

Gal, G. & Weiner, I. (1998). Latent inhibition is disrupted by shell lesion but restored by an addition of core lesion. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10, Suppl. 10, 118.04.Google Scholar

Galef, B. G., Jr. & Osborne, B. (1978). Novel taste facilitation of the association of visual cues with toxicosis in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92, 907–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallagher, P. C. & Holland, P. C. (1992). Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairments in rats with hippocampal damage. Hippocampus, 2, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallagher, P. C., Graham, P. W. & Holland, P. C. (1990). The amygdala central nucleus and appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: lesions impair one class of conditioned behavior. The Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 1906–1911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallistel, C. R. & Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 289–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallo, M. & Candido, A. (1995). Dorsal hippocampal lesions impair blocking but not latent inhibition of taste aversion learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia-Gutierrez, A. & Rosas, J. M. (2003). Context change as the mechanism of reinstatement in causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 292–310.Google ScholarPubMed

Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., Mackintosh, N. J., Goodal, G., Cotton, M. M. & Feldon, J. (1984). Successful overshadowing and blocking in hippocampectomized rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 12, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gelperin, A. (1986). Complex associative learning in small neural networks. Trends in Neuro Sciences, 9, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelperin, A., Hopfield, J. J. & Tank, D. W. (1985). The logic of Limax learning. In Model Neural Networks and Behavior, ed. Selverston, A.. New York: Plenum, pp. 237–261.Google Scholar

Getzels, J. & Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1976). The Creative Vision. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gewirtz, J. C., Falls, W. A. & Davis, M. (1997). Normal conditioned inhibition and extinction of freezing and fear-potentiated startle following electrolytic lesions of medical prefrontal cortex in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111, 712–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy and Weber's Law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbon, J. & Balsam, P. (1981). Spreading association in time. In Autoshaping and conditioning theory, eds. Locurto, C. M., Terrace, H. S. & Gibbon, J.. New York: Academic, pp. 219–253.Google Scholar

Gibbons, H. & Rammsayer, T. H. (1999). Differential effects of personality traits related to the P-ImpUSS dimension on latent inhibition in healthy female subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1157–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleitman, H. (1971). Forgetting of long-term memories in animals. In Animal Memory, ed. Honig, W. K. & James, P. H. R.. New York: Academic, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar

Gluck, M. A. & Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: a computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gluck, M. A. & Myers, C. E. (1994). Context, conditioning, and hippocampal representation in animal learning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 835–847.Google Scholar

Goddard, M. J. & Jenkins, H. M. (1988). Blocking of a CS US association by a US US association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 177–186.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, F., Quinn, J. J. & Fanselow, M. S. (2003). Differential effects of adding and removing components of a context on the generalization of conditional freezing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 78–83.Google ScholarPubMed

Good, M. & Honey, R. C. (1991). Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Good, M. & Honey, R. (1993). Selective hippocampus lesions abolish contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23–33.Google Scholar

Goodwin, F. K., Murphy, D. L., Brodie, H. K. & Bunney, W. E. (1970). L-dopa, catecholamines, and behavior: a clinical and biochemical study in depressed patients. Biological Psychiatry, 2, 341–366.Google ScholarPubMed

Gordon, W. C. & Weaver, M. S. (1989). Cue–induced transfer of CS preexposure effects across contexts. Animal Learning and Behavior, 17, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gormezano, I. & Moore, J. W. (1969). Classical conditioning. In Learning Processes, ed. M. H. Marx. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, T. J., Collins, A. C. & Wehner, J. M. (2001). Nicotine enhances latent inhibition and ameliorates ethanol-induced deficits in latent inhibition. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 3, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grahame, N. J., Barnet, R., Gunther, L. & Miller, R. (1994). Latent inhibition as a performance deficit resulting from CS-context associations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 22, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grahame, N. J., Hallam, S. C., Geier, L. & Miller, R. R. (1990). Context as an occasion setter following either CS Acquisition and extinction or CS acquisition alone. Learning and Motivation, 21, 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J. A. (1971). The Psychology of Fear and Stress. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar

Gray, J. A. (1975). Elements of a two-process theory of learning. London: Academic.Google Scholar

Gray, J. A., Buhusi, C. V. & Schmajuk, N. A. (1997). The transition from automatic to controlled processing. Neural Networks, 10, 1257–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J. A., Feldon, J., Rawlins, J. N. P., Hemsley, D. R. & Smith, A. D. (1991). The neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 20–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J. A., Mitchell, S. N., Joseph, M. H., Grigoryan, G. A., Date, S. & Hedges, H. (1994). Neurochemical mechanisms mediating the behavioral and cognitive effects of nicotine. Drug Development Research, 31, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, N. S., Hemsley, D. R. & Gray, J. A. (1992). Abolition of latent inhibition in acute, but not chronic schizophrenics. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 1, 83–89.Google Scholar

Groenewegen, H. J., Vermeulen-Van der Zee, E., te Kortschot, A. & Witter, M. P. (1987). Organization of the projections from the subiculum to the ventral striatum in the rat. A study using anterograde transport of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. Neuroscience, 23, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossberg, S. (1975). A neural model of attention, reinforcement, and discrimination learning. International Review of Neurobiology, 18, 263–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grossberg, S. & Merrill, J. W. L. (1992). A neural network model of adaptively timed reinforcement learning and hippocampal dynamics. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grossberg, S. & Schmajuk, N. A. (1989). Neural dynamics of adaptive timing and temporal discrimination during associative learning. Neural Networks, 2, 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groves, P. M. & Thompson, R. F. (1970). Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychological Review, 77, 419–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guez, D. & Miller, R. R. (2008). Blocking and pseudoblocking: the reply of Rattus norvegicus to Apis mellifera. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Colchester), 61, 1186–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and Associative Learning. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, G. (1996). Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, G. & Channel, S. (1985a). Latent inhibition and conditioning after preexposure to the training context. Learning and Motivation, 16, 381–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, G. & Channel, S. (1985b). Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of an orienting response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 470–481.Google Scholar

Hall, G. & Minor, H. (1984). A search for context-stimulus associations in latent inhibition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36B, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, G. & Pearce, J. M. (1979). Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 31–42.Google Scholar

Hall, G. & Pearce, J. M. (1982). Restoring the associability of a preexposed CS by a surprising event. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, G. & Schachtman, T. R. (1987). Differential effects of a retention interval on latent inhibition and the habituation of an orienting response. Animal Learning & Behavior, 15, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamann, S. B. & Squire, L. R. (1995). On the acquisition of new declarative knowledge in amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 1027–1044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hampson, S. E. (1990). Connectionistic Problem Solving: Computational Aspects of Biological Learning. Cambridge, MA: Birkhauser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, J-S., Gallahger, M. & Holland, P. (1995). Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 7323–7329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, J. A. (2006). Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning. Psychological Review, 113, 584–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harris, J. A. & Westbrook, R. F. (1998). Evidence that GABA transmission mediates context-specific extinction of learned fear. Psychopharmacology, 140, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harris, J. A., Jones, M. L., Bailey, G. K. & Westbrook, R. F. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in an extinction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 174–185.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley/Interscience.Google Scholar

Heith, C. D. & Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 8, 434–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, J., Mednick, S. A. & Thompson, R. E. (1966). Acquistion and retention of remote associates in process-reactive schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 142, 418–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hinzman, D. L. (1991). Why are formal models useful in psychology? In Relating Theory and Data: Essays on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock, ed. Hockley, W. E. & Lewandosky, S.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Hirsh, R. (1974). The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: a theory. Behavioral Biology, 12, 421–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hirsh, R., Leber, B. & Gillman, K. (1978). Fornix fibers and motivational states as controllers of behavior: a study stimulated by the contextual retrieval theory. Behavioral Biology, 22, 463–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hobin, J. A., Ji, J. & Maren, S. (2005). Ventral hippocampal muscimol disrupts context-specific fear memory retrieval after extinction in rats. Hippocampus, 16, 174–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1977). Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 77–104.Google ScholarPubMed

Holland, P. C. (1983). Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. In Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Discrimination Processes, ed. Commons, M. L., Herrnstein, R. J. & Wagner, A. R.. New York: Ballinger, vol. 4, pp. 183–206.Google Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1986a). Temporal determinants of occasion setting in feature positive discriminations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 14, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1986b). Transfer after serial feature positive discrimination training. Learning and Motivation, 17, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1989a). Acquisition and transfer of conditional discrimination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 154–165.Google Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1989b). Feature extinction enhances transfer of occasion setting. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1989c). Occasion setting with simultaneous compounds in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 183–193.Google Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1989d). Transfer of negative occasion setting and conditioned inhibition across conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 311–328.Google ScholarPubMed

Holland, P. C. (1990). Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: image and action. Cognition, 37, 105–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holland, P. C. (1991). Learning, thirst, and drinking. In Thirst: Physiological and Psychological Aspects, eds. Ramsey, D. J. & Booth, D.. New York: Springer, pp. 279–295.Google Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 28, 69–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. C. (1998). Temporal control in Pavlovian occasion setting. Behavioral Processes, 44, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holland, P. C. (1999). Overshadowing and blocking as acquisition deficits: no recovery after extinction of overshadowing or blocking cues. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52B, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. C. (2000). Trial and intertrial durations in appetitive conditioning in rats. Animal Learning and Behaviour, 28, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. C. & Forbes, D. R. (1980). Effects of compound or element preexposure on compound flavor aversion conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, E. C. & Haas, M. L. (1993). The effects of target salience in operant feature positive discriminations. Learning and Motivation, 24, 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, E. C. & Lamarre, J. (1984). Transfer of inhibition after serial and simultaneous feature negative discrimination training. Learning and Motivation, 15, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, P. C., Hamlin, P. A. & Parsons, J. P. (1997). Temporal specificity in serial feature positive discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 95–109.Google ScholarPubMed

Holland, P. C., Lamoureux, J. A., Han, J-S. & Gallagher, M. (1999). Hippocampal lesions interfere with Pavlovian negative occasion setting. Hippocampus, 9, 143–157.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Honey, R. & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Honey, R. C. & Hall, G. (1988). Overshadowing and blocking procedures in latent inhibition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 163–186.Google Scholar

Honey, R. C. & Hall, G. (1989). Attenuation of latent inhibition after compound pre-exposure: associative and perceptual explanations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 41, 355–368.Google ScholarPubMed

Horvitz, J. C. (2000). Mesolimbocortical and nigrostriatal dopamine responses to salient non-reward events. Neuroscience, 96, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huff, N. C., Alba Hernandez, J., Blanding, N. & LaBar, K. S. (2007). Effects of immediate versus delayed extinction on the renewal of conditioned fear in humans. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts.

Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts.Google Scholar

Ishii, K., Haga, Y. & Hishimura, Y. (1999). Distractor effect on latent inhibition of conditioned flavor aversion in rats. Japanese Psychological Research, 41, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarrard, L. E. & Davidson, T. L. (1991). On the hippocampus and learned conditional responding: effects of aspiration versus ibotenate lesions. Hippocampus, 1, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jenkins, J. J. & Sainsbury, R. (1969). The development of stimulus control through differential reinforcement. In Fundamental Issues in Associative Learning, eds. Mackintosh, N.J. & Honig, W. K.. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University Press, pp. 123–161.Google Scholar

Ji, J. & Maren, S. (2005). Electrolytic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus disrupt renewal of conditional fear after extinction. Learning and Memory, 12, 270–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, D. M., Baker, J. D. & Azorlosa, J. L. (2000). Acquisition, extinction, and reinstatement of Pavlovian fear conditioning: the roles of the NMDA receptor and nitric oxide. Brain Research, 857, 66–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, S. H., Gray, J. A. & Hemsley, D. R. (1990). The Kamin blocking effect, incidental learning and psychoticism. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, S. H., Gray, J. A. & Hemsley, D. R. (1992). Loss of the Kamin blocking effect in acute but not chronic schizophrenics. Biological Psychiatry, 32, 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, M. H., Peters, S. L. & Gray, J. A. (1993). Nicotine blocks latent inhibition in rats: evidence for a critical role of increased functional activity of dopamine in the mesolimbic system at conditioning rather than pre-exposure. Psychopharmacology, 110, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kamil, A. C. (1969) Some parameters of the second-order conditioning of fear in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 364–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kamin, L. (1968). Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation, ed. Ramsey, D. J. & Booth, D.. Coral Gables, FL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 9–32.Google Scholar

Kamin, L. (1969a). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In Punishment and aversive behavior, ed. Campbell, B. A. & Church, R. M.. New York: Appleton–Century–Crofts, pp. 279–296.Google Scholar

Kamin, L. J. (1969b). Selective association and conditioning. In Fundamental Issues in Associative Learning, ed. Mackintosh, N. J. & Honig, W. K.. Proceedings of a symposium held at Dalhousie University, Halifax, June 1968. Halifax: Dalhousie University Press, pp. 42–64.Google Scholar

Kamprath, K. & Wotjak, C. T. (2004). Nonassociative learning processes determine expression and extinction of conditioned fear in mice. Learning & Memory, 11, 770–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kasprow, W., Schachtman, T. & Miller, R. (1987). The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: Manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory associative strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavioral Processes, 13, 395–406.Google ScholarPubMed

Kasprow, W., Catterson, D., Schatchman, T. & Miller, R. (1984). Attenuation of latent inhibition by postacquisition reminder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36B, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, M. A. & Bolles, R. C. (1981). A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 318–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, H. & Pearce, J. M. (1984). The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavioral Processes, 10, 90–109.Google ScholarPubMed

Kehoe, E. J. (1986). Summation and configuration in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to compound stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 186–195.Google Scholar

Kehoe, E. J. (1988). A layered network model of associative learning: learning to learn and configuration. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 411–422.Google ScholarPubMed

Kehoe, E. J., Weidemann, G. & Dartnall, S. (2004). Apparatus exposure produces profound declines in conditioned nictitating-membrane responses to discrete conditioned stimuli by the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 259–270.Google Scholar

Kiernan, M. J. & Westbrook, R. F. (1993). Effects of exposure to a to-be-shocked environment upon the rat's freezing response: evidence for facilitation, latent inhibition, and perceptual learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killcross, A. S., Dickinson, A. & Robbins, T. W. (1994a). Amphetamine-induced disruptions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated – implications for animal models of schizophrenic attentional dysfunction. Psychopharmacology, 115, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Killcross, A. S., Dickinson, A. & Robbins, T. W. (1994b). Effects of the neuroleptic α-flupenthixol on latent inhibition in aversely- and appetitively-motivated paradigms: evidence for dopamine-reinforcer interactions. Psychopharmacology, 115, 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killcross, A. S., Stanhope, K. J., Dourish, C. T. & Piras, G. (1997). WAY100635 and latent inhibition in the rat: selective effects at preexposure. Behavioural Brain Research, 88, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Killcross, S. (2001). Loss of latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion following exposure to a novel flavour before test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killcross, S. & Balleine, B. (1996). Role of primary motivation in stimulus preexposure effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 96, 32–42.Google Scholar

Killcross, S., Robbins, T. W. & Everitt, B. J. (1997). Different types of fear conditioned behaviour mediated by separate nuclei within amygdala. Nature, 388, 377–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Killeen, P. R. & Fetterman, J. G. (1988). A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review, 95, 274–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kishimoto, H., Yamada, K., Iseki, E., Kosaka, K. & Okoshi, T. (1998). Brain imaging of affective disorders and schizophrenia. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 52, Suppl, S212-S214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, D. C., Nguyen, H. T. & Bandettini, P. A. (2005). The role of the human amygdala in the production of conditioned fear responses. Neuroimage, 26, 1193–2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knudsen, E. I. & Brainard, M. S. (1995). Creating a unified representation of visual and auditory space in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohonen, T. (1977). Associative Memory. A System Theoretical Approach. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konorski, J. (1948). Conditioned Reflexes and Neuron Organization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative Activity of the Brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Krabbendam, L., Arts, B., Os, J. & Aleman, A. (2005). Cognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a quantitative review. Schizophrenia Research, 80, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kraemer, P. J., Randall, C. K. & Carbary, T. J. (1991). Release from latent inhibition with delayed testing. Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. & Blair, N. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 636–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

LaBar, K. S. & Phelps, E. A. (2005). Reinstatement of conditioned fear in humans is context dependent and impaired in amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lamarre, J. & Holland, P. C. (1987). Acquisition and transfer of serial feature negative discriminations. Learning and Motivation, 18, 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamoureux, J. A., Buhusi, C. V. & Schmajuk, N. A. (1998). A real time theory of Pavlovian conditioning: simple stimuli and occasion setters. In: Occasion Setting: Associative Learning and Cognition in Animals, ed. Schmajuk, N. A., & Holland, P. C.. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 383–424.Google Scholar

Lantz, A. E. (1973). Effect of number of trials, interstimulus interval, and dishabituation on subsequent conditioning in a CER paradigm. Animal Learning & Behavior, 1, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelley, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Emotion and the amygdala. In The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction, ed. Aggleton, J.. New York: Wiley–Liss.Google Scholar

LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legault, M. & Wise, R. A. (2001). Novelty-evoked elevations of nucleus accumbens dopamine: dependence on impulse flow from the ventral subiculum and glutamatergic neurotransmission in the ventral tegmental area. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 819–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lencz, T., Smith, C. W., McLaughlin, D., Auther, A., Nakayama, E., Hovey, L. & Cornblatt, B. A. (2006). Generalized and specific neurocognitive deficits in prodromal schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 59, 863–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lipska, B. K., Jaskiw, G. E., Chrapusta, S., Karoum, F. & Weinberger, D. R. (1992). Ibotenic acid lesion of the ventral hippocampus differentially affects dopamine and its metabolites in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex in the rat. Brain Research, 585, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lipska, B. K., Jaskiw, G. E., Karoum, F., Phillips, I., Kleinman, J. E. & Weinberger, D. R. (1991). Dorsal hippocampal lesion does not affect dopaminergic indices in the basal ganglia. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 40, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Livesey, E. J. & Boakes, R. A. (2004). Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B, 57, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loechner, K. J. & Weisz, D. J. (1987). Hippocampectomy and feature-positive discrimination. Behavioural Brain Research, 26, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

LoLordo, V. M. (1979). Selective associations. In Mechanisms of Learning and Motivation, ed. Dickinson, A. & Boakes, R. A.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 367–398.Google Scholar

Lovibond, P. E., Been, S. L., Mitchell, C. J., Bouton, M. E. & Frohardt, R. (2003). Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude. Memory & Cognition, 31, 133–42.Google ScholarPubMed

Lovibond, P. F., Preston, G. C. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Pyschology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360–375.Google Scholar

Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubow, R. E. & Moore, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced preexposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubow, R. E., Weiner, I. & Schnur, P. (1981). Conditioned attention theory. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, ed. Bower, G. H.. New York: Academic, vol. 15, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar

Lubow, R. E., Weiner, I., Schlossberg, A. & Baruch, I. (1987). Latent inhibition and schizophrenia. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 464–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lysle, D. T. & Fowler, H. (1985). Inhibition as a “slave” process: deactivation of conditioned inhibition through extinction of conditioned excitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 71–94.Google ScholarPubMed

Machado, A. (1997). Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. Psychological Review, 104(2), 241–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mackintosh, N. J. (1973). Stimulus selection: learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In Constraints of Learning, ed. Hinde, R. A. & Hinde, J. S.. London: Academic.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and Associative Learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. & Turner, C. (1971). Blocking as a function of novelty of CS and predictability of UCS. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maes, J. H. R. & Vossen, J. M. H. (1996). Differential inhibition using contextual stimuli. Behavioural Processes, 37, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maren, S. & Chang, C. (2006). Recent fear is resistant to extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 18020–18025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markman, A. (1989). LMS rules and the inverse base-rate effect: comment on Gluck and Bower (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marlin, N. A. (1982). Within-compound associations between the context and the conditioned stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 13, 526–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In The Creative Cognition Approach, ed. Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B. & Finke, R. A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In Handbook of Creativity, ed. Sternberg, R. J.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. & Hasenfus, N. (1978). EEG differences as a function of creativity, stage of the creative process, and effort to be original. Biological Psychology, 6, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matzel, L., Brown, A. & Miller, R. (1987). Associative effects of US preexposure: modulation of conditioned responding by an excitatory training context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 65–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Matzel, L., Schachtman, T. & Miller, R. (1985). Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus. Learning and Motivation, 16, 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaren, I. P. L., Kaye, H. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Psychology and Neurobiology, ed. Morris, R. G. M.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

McCloskey, M. & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, ed. Bower, G. H.. New York: Academic, vol. 24, pp. 109–165.Google Scholar

McCormick, D. A., Steinmetz, J. E. & Thompson, R. F. (1985). Lesions of the inferior olivary complex cause extinction of the classically conditioned eyeblink response. Brain Research, 359, 120–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McKinzie, D. L. & Spear, N. E. (1995). Ontogenetic differences in conditioning to context and CS as a function of context saliency and CS-US interval. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaren, I. P. L. & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 28, 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaren, I. P. L., Kaye, H. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Psychology and Neurobiology, ed. Morris, R. G. M.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

McNaughton, N. (2004). The conceptual nervous system of J. A. Gray: anxiety and neuroticism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 227–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPhee, J. E., Rauhut, A. S. & Ayres, J. J. B. (2001). Evidence for learning deficit versus performance deficit theories of latent inhibition in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 32, 274–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meck, W. H. & Church, J. (1982). Abstraction of temporal attributes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 1–29.Google Scholar

Meck, W. H. & Church, J. (1987). Cholinergic modulation of the content of temporal memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 457–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meeter, M.Myers, C. E. & Gluck, M. A. (2005). Integrating incremental learning and episodic memory models of the hippocampal region. Psychological Review, 112, 560–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Melchers, K. G., Wolff, S. & Lachnit, H. (2006). Extinction of conditioned inhibition through nonreinforced presentation of the inhibitor. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 662–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Merten, T. (1992). Word association and schizophrenia: an empirical study. Nervenarzt, 63, 401–408.Google Scholar

Micco, D. J., & Schwartz, M. (1972). Effects of hippocampal lesions upon the developments of Pavlovian internal inhibition in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 76, 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milad, M. R., Orr, S. P., Pitman, R. K. & Rauch, S. L. (2005). Context modulation of memory for fear extinction in humans. Psychophysiology, 42, 456–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, R. & Matute, H. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 370–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, R., Hallam, S. & Grahame, N. (1990). Inflation of comparator stimuli following CS training. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, R. R. & Matzel, L. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: a response rule for the expression of associations. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, ed. Bower, G. H.. Orlando, FL: Academic, vol. 2, pp. 51–92.Google Scholar

Miller, R. R. & Schachtman, T. (1985). Conditioning context as an associative baseline: implications for response generation and the nature of conditioned inhibition. In Information Processing in Animals: Conditioned Inhibition, ed. Miller, R. R. & Spear, N. E.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 51–88.Google Scholar

Miller, R. R., Schachtman, T. & Matzel, L. (1988). Failure to attenuate blocking by posttraining extinction of a blocking stimulus. Unpublished raw data. Cited in Blaisdell et al. (1999).

Milner, B. R. (1966). Amnesia following operation on temporal lobes. In Amnesia, ed. Whitty, C. W. N. & Zangwill, O. L.. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Miserendino, M. J. D., Sananes, C. B., Melia, K. R. & Davis, M. (1990). Blocking of acquisition but not expression of conditioned fear-potentiated startle by NMDA antagonists in the amygdala. Nature, 345, 716–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, C. J., Lovibond, P. F. & Condoleon, M. (2005). Evidence for deductive reasoning in blocking of causal judgments. Learning and Motivation, 36, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moody, E. W., Sunsay, C. & Bouton, M. E. (2006) Priming and trial spacing in extinction: effects on extinction performance, spontaneous recovery, and reinstatement in appetitive conditioning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 809–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moore, J. W., & Choi, J. S. (1998). Conditioned stimuli are occasion setters. In Occasion Setting: Associative Learning and Cognition in Animals, eds. Schmajuk, N. A. & Holland, P. C.. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 279–318.Google Scholar

Moore, J. W. &. Schmajuk, N. A. (2008). Kamin blocking. Scholarpedia 3, 3542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, J. W. & Stickney, K. J. (1980). Formation of attentional-associative networks in real time: role of the hippocampus and implications for conditioning. Physiological Psychology, 8, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, J. W., Yeo, C. H., Oakley, D. A. & Russell, I. S. (1980). Conditioned inhibition of the nictitating membrane response in decorticate rabbits. Behavioural Brain Research, 1, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morell, J. R. & Holland, E. C. (1993). Summation and transfer of negative occasion setting. Animal Learning and Behavior, 21, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P. & O'Keefe, J. (1982). Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature, 297, 681–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morris, R. G. M., Schenk, F., Tweedie, F. & Jarrard, L. E. (1990). Ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and/or subiculum: dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2, 1016–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morrow, B. A., Elsworth, J. D., Rasmusson, A. M. & Roth, R. H. (1999). The role of mesoprefrontal dopamine neurons in the acquisition and expression of conditioned fear in the rat. Neuroscience, 92, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Myers, C. E., Gluck, M. A. & Granger, R. (1995). Dissociation of hippocampal and entorhinal function in asociative learning: a computational approach. Psychobiology, 23, 116–138.Google Scholar

Myers, K. M., Ressler, K. J. & Davis, M. (2006). Different mechanisms of fear extinction dependent on length of time since fear acquisition. Learning and Memory, 13, 216–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nagaishi, T. & Nakajima, S. (2008). Further evidence for the summation of latent inhibition and overshadowing in rats' conditioned taste aversion. Learning and Motivation, 39, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakajima, S. & Nagaishi, T. (2005). Summation of latent inhibition and overshadowing in a generalized bait shyness paradigm of rats. Behavioural Processes, 69, 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Napier, R. M., Macrae, M. & Kehoe, E. J. (1992). Rapid reacquisition in conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 182–192.Google ScholarPubMed

Nicholson, D. A. & Freeman, J. H.,Jr. (2002). Medial dorsal thalamic lesions impair blocking and latent inhibition of the conditioned eyeblink response in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 276–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oades, R. D. & Halliday, G. M. (1987). Ventral tegmental (A10) system: neurobiology. 1. Anatomy and connectivity. Brain Research, 434, 117–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oakley, D. A. & Russell, I. S. (1972). Neocortical lesions and Pavlovian conditioning. Physiology and Behavior, 8, 915–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oakley, D. A. & Russell, I. S. (1973). Differential and reversal conditioning in partially neodecorticate rabbits. Physiology and Behavior, 13, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oakley, D. A. & Russell, I. S. (1975). Role of cortex in Pavlovian discrimination learning. Physiology and Behavior, 15, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O'Donnell, P. & Grace, A. A. (1998). Dysfunctions in multiple interrelated systems as the neurobiological bases of schizophrenic symptom clusters. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O'Keefe, J. & Nadel, L. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Orr, W. B. & Berger, T. W. (1985). Hippocampectomy disrupts the topography of conditioned nictitating membrane responses during reversal learning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 99, 35–45.Google ScholarPubMed

Oswald, C. J. P.,Yee, B. K., Rawlins, J. N. P., Bannerman, D. B., Good, M. & Honey, R. C. (2002). The influence of selective lesions to components of the hippocampal system on the orienting response, habituation and latent inhibition. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1983–1990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Otto, T. & Poon, P. J. (2006). Dorsal hippocampal contributions to unimodal contextual conditioning. Journal of Neuroscience, 26: 6603–6609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Packard, M. G. & McGaugh, J. L. (1992). Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on acquisition of two water maze tasks: further evidence for multiple memory systems. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 439–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Padfield, P. D. & Lawrence, B. (2003). The birth of flight control: an engineering analysis of the Wright brothers' 1902 glider. The Aeronautical Journal, December, 697–718.Google Scholar

Partridge, D. & Rowe, J. (2002). Creativity: A computational modeling approach. In Creativity, Cognition, and Knowledge: An Interaction, ed. Dartnall, T.. Westport, CT: Praeger–Greenwood.Google Scholar

Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearce, J. M. & Hall, G. (1979). Loss of associability by a compound stimulus comprising excitatory and inhibitory elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 19–30.Google ScholarPubMed

Pearce, J. M. & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 332–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearce, J. M., Kaye, H. & Hall, G. (1983). Predictive accuracy and stimulus associability: development of a model of Pavlovian learning. In Quantitative Analyses of Behaviour, ed. Commons, M., Herrnstein, R. J. & Wagner, A. R.. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, vol. 3, pp. 241–255.Google Scholar

Peet, M. & Peters, S. (1995). Drug-induced mania. Drug Safety, 12, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Penick, S. & Solomon, P. R. (1991). Hippocampus, context, and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 611–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perry, B., Luchins, D. & Schmajuk, N. A. (1993). Hippocampal lesions and dopamine receptor density. Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco, May 1993.Google Scholar

Pineño, O., Urushihara, K. & Miller, R. R. (2005). Spontaneous recovery from forward and backward blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes, 31, 172–183.Google ScholarPubMed

Pineño, O., Urushihara, K., Stout, S., Fuss, J. & Miller, R. (2006). When more is less: extending training of the blocking association following compound training attenuates the blocking effect. Learning and Behavior, 34, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Port, R. L. & Patterson, M. M. (1984). Fimbrial lesions and sensory preconditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 98, 584–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Port, R. L., Beggs, A. L. & Patterson, M. M. (1987). Hippocampal substrate of sensory associations. Physiology & Behavior, 39, 643–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pothuizen, H. H. J., Jongen-Rêlo, A. L., Feldon, J. & Yee, B. K. (2006). Latent inhibition of conditioned taste aversion is not disrupted, but can be enhanced, by selective nucleus accumbens shell lesions in rats. Neuroscience, 137, 1119–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poulos, A. M., Pakaprot, N., Mahdi, B., Kehoe, E. J. & Thompson, R. F. (2006). Decremental effects of context exposure following delay eyeblink conditioning in rabbits. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 730–734CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Prados, J. (2000). Effects of varying the amount of preexposure to spatial cues on a subsequent navigation task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puga, F., Barrett, D. W., Bastida, C. C. & Gonzalez-Lima, F. (2007). Functional networks underlying latent inhibition learning in the mouse brain. NeuroImage, 38, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Purves, D., Bonardi, C. & Hall, G. (1995). Enhancement of latent inhibition in rats with electrolytic lesions of the hipopcampus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 366–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rauhut, A. S., Thomas, B. L. & Ayres, J. J. B. (2001). Treatments that weaken Pavlovian conditioned fear and thwart its renewal in rats: implications for treating human phobias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 99–114.Google ScholarPubMed

Rauhut, A. S., McPhee, J. E., DiPietro, N. T. & Ayres, J. J. B. (2000). Conditioned inhibition training of the competing cue after compound conditioning does not reduce cue. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redhead, E. S. & Pearce, J. M. (1995a). Similarity and discrimination learning. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 46–66.Google Scholar

Redhead, E. S. & Pearce, J. M. (1995b). Stimulus salience and negative patterning. The Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 67–83.Google Scholar

Reed, P. (1991). Blocking latent inhibition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 292–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reilly, S., Harley, C. & Revusky, S. (1993). Ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus enhance latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion and inrease resistance to extinction in conditioned taste preference. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 966–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiss, S. & Wagner, A. R. (1972). CS Habituation produces a “latent inhibition effect” but no active “conditioned inhibition”. Learning and Motivation, 3, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rescorla, R. A. (1971b). Variation in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement following prior inhibitory conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 2, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Evidence for a unique-cue account of configural conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar