Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7mfl8 Total loading time: 0.314 Render date: 2021-11-27T13:03:18.232Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Chapter 3 - Materiomics using synthetic materials: metals, cements, covalent polymers and supramolecular systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Jan de Boer
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Clemens A. van Blitterswijk
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Get access



To screen biomaterials in a materiomics approach, libraries of materials are produced. Different materials are used, varying from metals and cements, to covalent polymers that can be either premixed or polymerized in situ, to supramolecular systems that can be applied in a modular approach. This chapter describes the generation of such libraries using different kinds of materials and chemistries. Additionally, the advantages and limitations of the application of these different systems/biomaterials in a materiomics approach are discussed.


Different synthetic biomaterials are used for many biomedical applications, varying from metals and ceramic cements, to polymers and supramolecular systems. To screen these biomaterials in a materiomics approach, as said above, libraries of materials are produced. Variations in biomaterials are screened as continuous gradients or in a discrete fashion. The properties that are varied and methods used to create variation within these libraries depend on the type of biomaterial. For the hard metal and ceramic-based biomaterials, the surface interaction with tissue is the property of most interest, and therefore properties such as surface roughness and topography are varied. Covalent polymers are diversified using combinatorial chemistry. The dynamic and self-assembling nature of supramolecular systems allows for the development of material libraries using a modular approach by mixing and matching of different compounds modified with supramolecular moieties.

High-Throughput Screening of Biomaterial Properties
, pp. 31 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Collier, JH, Rudra, JS, Gasiorowski, JZ, Jung, JP. Multi-component extracellular matrices based on peptide self-assembly. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39(9):3413–24. This tutorial review describes the approaches that have been taken to make synthetic extracellular matrices. A diversity of strategies that are based on molecular self-assembly is compared with the structures and processes in native ECM.Google Scholar
Corbett, PT, Leclaire, J, Vial, L, West, KR et al. Dynamic combinatorial chemistry. Chem Rev. 2006;106(9):3652–711 presents a comprehensive review of all aspects of dynamic combinatorial chemistry and some related approaches. It includes a detailed discussion of the various types of reversible chemistries, experimental setups and applications, and is not limited to biomaterials.Google Scholar
Dankers, PYW, Meijer, EW. Supramolecular biomaterials. a modular approach towards tissue engineering. Bull Chem Soc Japan. 2007;80(11):2047–73 illustrates the strength of the modular approach to easily diversify material properties of supramolecular polymers. Via a simple ‘mix-and-match’ principle, mechanical properties are tuned (see also refs (42) and (44)).Google Scholar
Fisher, JP, Dean, D, Engel, PS, Mikos, AG. Photoinitiated polymerization of biomaterials. Ann Rev Mater Res. 2001;31(1):171–81 reviews the photopolymerization for polymers typically suited for biomaterials. Furthermore, studies on these materials related to biomaterials and cell interactions are discussed.Google Scholar
Le Guéhennec, L, Soueidan, A, Layrolle, P, Amouriq, Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dental Mater. 2007;23(7):844–54 shows an overview and discusses future trends of the different methods used for increasing surface roughness or applying coatings to improve osseointegration of titanium dental implants.Google Scholar
Lee, J-H, Gu, Y, Wang, H, Lee, WY. Microfluidic 3D bone tissue model for high-throughput evaluation of wound-healing and infection-preventing biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2012 Feb;33(4):999–1006. This paper describes the development of a microfluidic 3D bone tissue model to assess the efficacy of biomaterials aimed at accelerating implant wound healing and preventing bacterial infection.Google Scholar
Kohn, J, Welsh, WJ, Knight, D. A new approach to the rational discovery of polymeric biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2007;28(29):4171–7. This is a leading opinion paper that illustrates both the need for new approaches to biomaterials discovery as well as the significant promise inherent in the use of combinatorial synthesis, high-throughput experimentation, and computational modelling.Google Scholar
Moulin, E, Cormos, G, Giuseppone, N. Dynamic combinatorial chemistry as a tool for the design of functional materials and devices. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(3):1031. This tutorial review illustrates the possibilities that supramolecular and dynamic covalent systems provide to develop new materials and devices via the application of dynamic combinatorial chemistry.Google Scholar
Singh, M, Berkland, C, Detamore, MS. Strategies and applications for incorporating physical and chemical signal gradients in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B: Rev. 2008;14(4):341–66. This review presents an overview of key methodologies to generate all kinds of gradients in a diversity of biomaterials and their possible implication for tissue engineering applications.Google Scholar
Viney, C. Processing and microstructural control: lessons from natural materials. Mater Sci Rep 1993;10(5):187–236. This review demonstrates how material science can benefit from detailed knowledge of the synthetic pathways and molecular self-assembly mechanisms by which natural materials are produced, by describing the most significant classes of natural macromolecules.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, K, Sun, L, Chow, LC, Young, MF, Simon, CG. Combinatorial screening of osteoblast response to 3D calcium phosphate/poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds using gradients and arrays. Biomaterials. 2011;32(5):1361–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehn, J-M. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives. VCH; 1995.
Lehn, J-M. From supramolecular chemistry towards constitutional dynamic chemistry and adaptive chemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 2007;36(2):151–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DG, Levenberg, S, Langer, R. Nanoliter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and application to human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22(7):863–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankers, PYW, Boomker, JM, Huizinga-van der Vlag, A et al. Bioengineering of living renal membranes consisting of hierarchical, bioactive supramolecular meshes and human tubular cells. Biomaterials. 2011;32(3):723–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, GA, Czeisler, C, Niece, KL et al. Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density nanofibers. Science. 2004 27;303(5662):1352–5Google Scholar
Branco, MC, Schneider, JP. Self-assembling materials for therapeutic delivery. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(3):817–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonge, LT, Leeuwenburgh, SCG, Wolke, JGC, Jansen, JA. Organic–inorganic surface modifications for titanium implant surfaces. Pharmaceut Res. 2008 29;25(10):2357–69.Google Scholar
Le Guéhennec, L, Soueidan, A, Layrolle, P, Amouriq, Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dental Mater. 2007;23(7):844–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, HHK, Takagi, S, Quinn, JB, Chow, LC. Fast-setting calcium phosphate scaffolds with tailored macropore formation rates for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2004;68A(4):725–34.Google Scholar
Liao, H, Walboomers, XF, Habraken, WJEM et al. Injectable calcium phosphate cement with PLGA, gelatin and PTMC microspheres in a rabbit femoral defect. Acta Biomater. 2010;7(4):1752–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perut, F, Montufar, EB, Ciapetti, G et al. Novel soybean/gelatine-based bioactive and injectable hydroxyapatite foam: Material properties and cell response. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(4):1780–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Félix Lanao, RP, Leeuwenburgh, SCG, Wolke, JGC, Jansen, JA. In vitro degradation rate of apatitic calcium phosphate cement with incorporated PLGA microspheres. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(9):3459–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J, Eidelman, N, Kennedy, SB, Sehgal, A, Khatri, CA, Washburn, NR. Combinatorial screening of cell proliferation on poly(l-lactic acid)/poly(d, l-lactic acid) blends. Biomaterials. 2005;26(34):6906–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, JC, Karim, A, Amis, EJ. High-throughput measurement of polymer blend phase behavior. Macromolecules. 2000;15;33(16):5760–2.Google Scholar
Kohn, J, Welsh, WJ, Knight, D. A new approach to the rational discovery of polymeric biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2007;28(29):4171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, JP, Dean, D, Engel, PS, Mikos, AG. Photoinitiated polymerization of biomaterials. Ann Rev Mater Res. 2001;31(1):171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, T, Fukuma, D, Matsui, J. Combinatorial molecular imprinting: an approach to synthetic polymer receptors. Analyt Chem. 1998 Dec 11;71(2):285–90.Google Scholar
Lin-Gibson, S, Landis, FA, Drzal, PL. Combinatorial investigation of the structure–properties characterization of photopolymerized dimethacrylate networks. Biomaterials. 2006 Mar; 27(9):1711–7.Google Scholar
Anderson, DG, Lynn, DM, Langer, R. Semi-automated synthesis and screening of a large library of degradable cationic polymers for gene delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2003;42(27):3153–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieper, R, Ekin, A, Webster, D et al. Combinatorial approach to study the effect of acrylic polyol composition on the properties of crosslinked siloxane-polyurethane fouling-release coatings. J Coatings Technol Res. 2007 Dec 1;4(4):453–61.Google Scholar
Ekin, A, Webster, D, Daniels, J et al. Synthesis, formulation, and characterization of siloxane-polyurethane coatings for underwater marine applications using combinatorial high-throughput experimentation. J Coatings Technol Res. 2007 Dec 1;4(4):435–51.Google Scholar
Burdick, JA, Khademhosseini, A, Langer, R. Fabrication of gradient hydrogels using a microfluidics/photopolymerization process. Langmuir. 2004;28;20(13):5153–6.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, K, Lin-Gibson, S, Wallace, WE et al. The effect of 3D hydrogel scaffold modulus on osteoblast differentiation and mineralization revealed by combinatorial screening. Biomaterials. 2010;31(19):5051–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertel, SI, Kohn, J. Evaluation of a series of tyrosine-derived polycarbonates as degradable biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994;28(8):919–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocchini, S, James, K, Tangpasuthadol, V, Kohn, J. A combinatorial approach for polymer design. J Am Chem Soc. 1997 May 1;119(19):4553–4.Google Scholar
Anderson, DG, Peng, W, Akinc, A et al. A polymer library approach to suicide gene therapy for cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004 Nov 9;101(45):16028–33.Google Scholar
Anderson, D, Tweedie, C, Hossain, N et al. A combinatorial library of photocrosslinkable and degradable materials. Adv Mater. 2006;18(19):2614–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaburet, JF, Mizomoto, H, Bradley, M. High-throughput evaluation of the wettability of polymer libraries. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2004;25(1):366–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, JC, Sormana, JL, Keselowsky, BG, Garcia, AJ, Tona, A, Karim, A et al. Combinatorial characterization of cell interactions with polymer surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 2003;66A(3):483–90.Google Scholar
Simon, J, Stephens, JS, Dorsey, SM, Becker, ML. Fabrication of combinatorial polymer scaffold libraries. Rev Sci Instrum. 2007 Jul;78(7):072207.Google Scholar
Liu, E, Treiser, MD, Patel, H et al. High-content profiling of cell responsiveness to graded substrates based on combinatorially variant polymers. Combinat Chem High-throughput Screening. 2009;12(7):646–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y, Bolikal, D, Becker, ML, Kohn, J, Zeiger, DN, Simon, CG. Combinatorial polymer scaffold libraries for screening cell–biomaterial interactions in 3D. Adv Mater. 2008;20(11):2037–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, RR, Chaney, BN, Rowley, J, Liebmann-Vinson, A, Genzer, J. Tailoring cell adhesion using surface-grafted polymer gradient assemblies. Adv Mater. 2005;17(23):2802–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, Y, Elliott, JT, Smith, JR et al. Gradient substrate assembly for quantifying cellular response to biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 2006;79A(4):974–88.Google Scholar
Ionov, L, Stamm, M, Diez, S. Size sorting of protein assemblies using polymeric gradient surfaces. Nano Lett. 2005;5(10):1910–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Y, Sawada, S, Nakabayashi, N et al. The effect of the chemical structure of the phospholipid polymer on fibronectin adsorption and fibroblast adhesion on the gradient phospholipid surface. Biomaterials. 1999;20(22):2185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kataoka, K, Harada, A, Nagasaki, Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: design, characterization and biological significance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001 Mar 23;47(1):113–31.Google Scholar
de Loos, M, Feringa, BL, van Esch, JH. Design and application of self-assembled low molecular weight hydrogels. Eur J Org Chem. 2005;3615–32.
Sijbesma, RP, Beijer, FH, Brunsveld, L et al. Reversible polymers formed from self-complementary monomers using quadruple hydrogen bonding. Science. 1997;278(5343):1601–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankers, PYW, Hermans, TM, Baughman, TW et al. Hierarchical formation of supramolecular transient networks in water: a modular injectable delivery system. Adv Mater. 2012;24(20):2703–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankers, PYW, Harmsen, MC, Brouwer, LA, Van Luyn, MJA, Meijer, EW. A modular and supramolecular approach to bioactive scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2005;4(7):568–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieltyka, RE, Bastings, MMC, Almen, GC et al. Modular synthesis of supramolecular ureidopyrimidinone–peptide conjugates using an oxime ligation strategy. Chem Commun. 2012;48(10):1452–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankers, PYW, van Leeuwen, ENM, van Gemert, GML et al. Chemical and biological properties of supramolecular polymer systems based on oligocaprolactones. Biomaterials. 2006;27(32):5490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellington, AD, Szostak, JW. In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature. 1990;346(6287):818–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeltinger, J, Schmid, E, Brandom, D et al. Advances in the development of coronary stents. Biomater. Forum. 2004;26(1),8–9, as refd in Kohn J. New approaches to biomaterials design. Nat Mater. 2004;3(11):745–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehn, J-M. Dynamers: dynamic molecular and supramolecular polymers. Prog Polym Sci. 2005 Aug;30(8–9):814–31.Google Scholar
Corbett, PT, Leclaire, J, Vial, L, West, KR et al. Dynamic combinatorial chemistry. Chem Rev. 2006;106(9):3652–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats