Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-x5mqb Total loading time: 0.316 Render date: 2021-11-28T08:33:55.254Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

13 - Faith in Law? Diffusing Tensions Between Diversity and Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Joel A. Nichols
Affiliation:
University of St Thomas, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

How should a democratic state and its public law system respond to claims by members of religious minorities seeking to establish private faith-based arbitration tribunals to resolve family disputes? Classic liberals and civic republicans would have had a quick response to such a query. They favored a strict separation between state and religion, as part of their support for drawing a plain and clean line between the public and private spheres. Be a citizen in public, a Jew (or a Catholic or a Muslim, and so on) in private, remains the favored mantra, dating back to as early as the 1791 French National Assembly’s decree admitting Jews as individuals to the rights of citizenship, after they had “freed” themselves from any communal semiautonomous governance institutions.

But the world now is a very different place. My aim in this chapter is to highlight the centrality of women, gender, and the family in renewed state and religion contestations that inject new meanings into the traditional categories of “private” and “public.” This chapter focuses exclusively on the situation of members of minority religions living in otherwise secularized societies. My interest, more specifically, lies in exploring how different legal arrangements between secular and religious jurisdictions shape and affect women’s rights to religious freedom and equality. Of special interest here are those situations in which renegotiated relations between state and religion intersect and interact with public concerns about power disparities between men and women in the resolution of family law disputes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Marriage and Divorce in a Multi-Cultural Context
Multi-Tiered Marriage and the Boundaries of Civil Law and Religion
, pp. 341 - 356
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, John R.Can Islam Be French? Pluralism and Pragmatism in a Secularist StatePrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2009Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller‘Mistresses of Their Own Destiny’: Group Rights, Gender, and Realistic Rights of Exit,Ethics 112 2002 205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, AnneMulticulturalism Without CulturePrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2007Google Scholar
Carroll, LucyMuslim Women and ‘Islamic Divorce’ in EnglandJournal of Muslim Minority Affairs 17 1997 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, SeylaThe Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global EraPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 2002Google Scholar
Bouchard, GérardTaylor, CharlesBuilding the Future: A Time for ReconciliationQuebecCommission de Consultation surles Pratiques d’Accommodement reliées aux Différences Culturelles 2008Google Scholar
Hirschl, RanShachar, AyeletThe New Wall of Separation: Respecting Diversity, Prohibiting CompetitionCardozo Law Review 30 2009 2535Google Scholar
Shachar, AyeletMulticultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s RightsCambridgeCambridge University Press 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bano, SamiaIn Pursuit of Religious and Legal Diversity: A Response to the Archbishop of Canterbury and the ‘Sharia Debate’ in Britain,Ecclesiastical Law Journal 10 2008 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, AyeletPrivatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law,Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9(2) 2008 573Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×