Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:40:52.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 24 - Fertility and premature menopause

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

By
Anthony J. Rutherford
Edited by
Nick Panay ,
Paula Briggs  and
Gab Kovacs
Nick Panay
Affiliation:
Queen Charlotte’s Hospital, London
Paula Briggs
Affiliation:
Sefton Community Sexual Health Service, Liverpool
Gab Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Managing the Menopause
21st Century Solutions
 , pp. 193 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nelson, LM, Covington, SN, Rebar, RW. An update: spontaneous premature ovarian failure is not an early menopause. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 1327–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, D, Conway, GS. Premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11: 391–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Donnell, RL, Warner, P, Lee, RJ, et al. Physiological sex steroid replacement in premature ovarian failure: randomized crossover trial of effect on uterine volume, endometrial thickness and blood flow, compared with a standard regimen. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 1130–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somboonporn, W, Davis, S, Seif, MW, et al. Testosterone for peri and postmenopausal women (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 4: CD004509.Google Scholar
Badawy, A, Goda, H, Ragab, A. Induction of ovulation in idiopathic premature ovarian failure: a randomized double-blind trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 15: 215–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferraretti, AP, Goossens, V, de Mouzon, J, et al.; European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2571–84.Google Scholar
Kupka, MS, Ferraretti, AP, de Mouzon, J, et al.; The European IVF-monitoring (EIM) Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2014; 10: 2099–113.Google Scholar
www.HFEA.gov.uk.Google Scholar
Shenfield, F, de Mouzon, J, Pennings, G, et al.; The ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:1361–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sung, L, Bustillo, M, Mukherjee, T, et al. Sisters of women with premature ovarian failure may not be ideal ovum donors. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 912–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyesanya, OA, Olufowobi, O, Ross, W, Sharif, K, Afnan, M. Prognosis of oocyte donation cycles: a prospective comparison of the in vitro fertilization – embryo transfer cycles of recipients who used shared oocytes versus those who used altruistic donors. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 930–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahuja, KK, Simons, EG, Mostyn, BJ, Bowen-Simpkins, P. An assessment of the motives and morals of egg share donors: policy of ‘payments’ to egg donors requires a fair review. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2671–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Financial compensation of oocyte donors. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 305–9.Google Scholar
Keehn, J, Holwell, E, Abdul-Karim, R, et al. Recruiting egg donors online: an analysis of in vitro fertilization clinics and agency websites’ adherence to American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines. Fertility and Sterility 2012; 98 (4): 995–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seem, DL, Lee, I, Umscheid, CA, Kuehnert, MJ; United States Public Health Service. PHS guideline for reducing human immunodeficiency virus, Hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus transmission through organ transplantation. Public Health Rep 2013; 128: 247–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, A. Oocyte Donation Survey. IVF-Worldwide.com/survey/oocyte-donation/results-oocyte-donation.html.Google Scholar
Huang, JYJ, Tomer, S, Kligman, I, Cholst, I. The use of gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist for ovarian suppression in donor egg recipients. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: S280–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glujovsky, D, Pesce, R, Fiszbajn, G, et al. Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived form donor oocytes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 1: CD006359.pub2.Google Scholar
Gutarra-Vilchez, RB, Bonfill Cosp, X, Glujovsky, D, Urrútia, G. Vasodilators for women undergoing assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 7: CD010001.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, S, Hamilton, MP, Shaaban, M, et al. Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non male factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 2075–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, SA, McGowan, L, Hirst, MW, et al.; towardSET Collaboration. Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 569–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budak, E, Garrido, N, Soares, SR, et al. Improvements achieved in an oocyte donation program over a 10-year period: sequential increase in implantation and pregnancy rates and decrease in high-order multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 342–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of National Statistics (year) Births in England and Wales by Characteristics of Birth 2, 2011. www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/characteristics-of-birth-2--england-and-wales/2011/sb-characteristics-of-birth-2.html.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×