Aitken, A.J. 1981. ‘The Scottish Vowel-Length Rule’. In: Benskin, M. and M.L. Samuels (eds.). So meny people longages and tonges: philological essays in Scots and mediaeval English presented to Angus McIntosh. Privately published; 131–157.Google Scholar

Aitchison, J. 1987. ‘The Language Lifegame: Prediction, Explanation and Linguistic Change’. In: Koopman, W. et al. (eds.). Explanation and Linguistic Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 11–32.Google Scholar

Aitchison, A.J. 1991. Language Change: Progress or Decay? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Algeo, J. and Pyles, T.. 2005 [5th ed.]. The Origins and Development of the English Language. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. 1988. ‘The Great Kentish Collapse’. In: Kastovsky, D. et al. (eds.). Luick Revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag; 97–107.Google Scholar

Anderson, J.M. and Ewen, C.J. (eds.). 1980. Studies in Dependency Phonology. Ludwigsburg Studies in Language and Linguistics 4. Ludwigsburg: R.O.U. Strauch.Google Scholar

Anderson, S. 1966. West Scandinavian Vowel Systems and the Ordering of Phonological Rules. Ph.D. thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Antonsen, E. 1965. ‘On Defining Stages in Prehistoric Germanic’. Language 41 /1: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Árnason, K. 1980. Quantity in Historical Phonology: Icelandic and Related Cases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Astruc, L. and Prieto, P.. 2006. ‘Stress and accent: acoustic correlates of metrical prominence in Catalan’. URL: http://prosodia.upf.edu/home/arxiu/publicacions/astruc/astruc_stress-accent-metrical-prominence.pdfGoogle Scholar

Auer, P. 1993. ‘Is a rhythm-based typology possible? A study of the role of prosody in phonological typology’. KontRI Working Paper No. 21, University Konstanz.Google Scholar

Bately, J. 1980. The Old English Orosius. Early English Text Society, Supplementary Series 6. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baugh, A.C. and Cable, T.. 2005. A History of the English Language. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bazell, C.E. 1962. ‘Six Questions of Old and Middle English Morphology’. In: Davis, N. and Wrenn, C.L. (eds.). English and Medieval Studies Presented to J.R.R. Tolkien on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. London: George Allen and Unwin; 51–62.Google Scholar

Beals, K. et al. (eds.). 1994. CLS 30 (Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society). Volume 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory. Chicago: the Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Benediktsson, H. (ed.). 1970a. The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics. Reykjavik: Vísindafélag Íslendinga.Google Scholar

Benediktsson, H. 1970b. ‘Aspects of Historical Phonology’. In: Benediktsson, , H. (ed.). The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics. Reykjavik: Vísindafélag Íslendinga; 87–129.Google Scholar

Bennett, J.A.W. and Smithers, G.V. (eds.). 1966. Early Middle English Verse and Prose. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. 1977. ‘Local Archives and Middle English Dialects’. Journal of the Society of Archivists 5 /8: 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benskin, M. 1982a. ‘The Letters <þ> and <y> in Later Middle English, and Some Related Matters’. Journal of the Society of Archivists 7: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benskin, M. 1982b. ‘Marian Verses from a Hedon Manuscript: some new materials for the Middle English dialectology of the East Riding’. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 5: 27–58.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. 1989. ‘Some Aspects of Cumbrian English, Mainly Medieval.’ In: Breivik, L.E. et al. (eds.) Essays on English Language in Honour of Bertil Sundby. Oslo: Novus Forlag; 13–46.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. 1991a. ‘The “Fit”-Technique Explained’. In: Riddy, F. (ed.). Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts. Essays celebrating the publication of a Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English; 9–26. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer; 9–26.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. 1991b. ‘In Reply to Dr. Burton’. Leeds Studies in English. New Series XXII: 209–262.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. 1992. ‘Some New Perspectives on the Origins of Standard Written English’. In: van Leuvensteijn, J.A. and Berns, J.B. (eds.). Dialect and Standard Language/Dialekt und Standardsprache in the English, Dutch, German and Norwegian Language Areas. Oxford; 71–105.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. 1994. ‘Descriptions of Dialects and Areal Distributions’. In: Laing, M. and Williamson, K. (eds.). Speaking in Our Tongues. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer; 169–187.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. 2002. ‘Chancery Standard’. In: Kay, C., Hough, C. and Wotherspoon, I. (eds.). New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics. Selected papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow, 21–26 August 2002. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 1–40.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. Forthcoming. ‘A Charm Against Thieves’. Paper on MS, Northamptonshire Record Office, Finch-Hatton 3047.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. and Laing, M.. 1981. ‘Translations and Mischsprachen in Middle English Manuscripts’. In: Benskin, M. and Samuels, M.L. (eds.). So meny people longages and tonges. Privately published; 55–106.Google Scholar

Benskin, M. and Samuels, M.L. (eds.). 1981. So meny people longages and tonges: philological essays in Scots and mediaeval English presented to Angus McIntosh. Privately published.Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, R. 1998. ‘Prosodic Optimization: The Middle English Length Adjustment’. English Language and Linguistics 2 /2: 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berndt, R. 1982. A History of the English Language. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar

Black, M. 1998. ‘Lollardy, Language Contact and the Great Vowel Shift’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 1 XCIX 1998: 53–69.Google Scholar

Blair, Peter H. 1991. An Introduction to Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. 1926. ‘A Set of Postulates for the Science of Language’. Language 2: 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boisson, C. 1982. ‘Remarques sur la chronologie interne du grand changement vocalique en anglais’. In: Apports français à la linguistique anglaise. Travaux 35, CIEREC. Université de Saint-Etienne.Google Scholar

Brisard, F. and Meeuwis, M.. 1994. ‘Variability and Code Allocation in Theory Formation on Language Change’. In:Beals, K. et al. (eds.). CLS 30 (Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society). Volume 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory. Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society;13–26.Google Scholar

Britton, D. 2002. ‘Northern Fronting and the North Lincolnshire Merger of the Reflexes of ME /u:/ and ME /o:/’. Language Sciences 24: 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, D. and Williamson, K.. 2002 (ms.). ‘A review of Northern Fronting and its developments in England and Scotland’. Paper read at the 12th ICEHL, Glasgow, Scotland, 23 August 2002.Google Scholar

Brown, C. (ed.). 1950. English Lyrics of the XIIIth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Brown, C. (ed.). 1952. Religious Lyrics of the XIVth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Burrow, J. (ed.). 1992. English Verse 1300–1500. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Burton, T.L. 1991. ‘On the Current State of Middle English Dialectology’. Leeds Studies in English. New Series XXII: 167–208.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabanillas, I. de la Cruz. 1999. ‘Northern Features in The Reeve’s Tale’. In: López, A.B. et al. (eds.). ‘Woonderous Ænglissce’, SELIM Studies in Medieval English Language. Universidade de Vigo; 43–50.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Catford, J.C. 1977. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Clark Hall, J.R. 1960. A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crothers, J. 1978. ‘Typology and Universals of Vowel Systems’. In: Greenberg, J. (ed.). Universals of Human Language: Phonology. Stanford University Press; 93–153.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. 2014. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cubbin, G.P. 1981. ‘Dialect and Scribal Usage in Medieval Lancashire: A New Approach to Local Documents’. Transactions of the Philological Society 79/1: 67–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curzan, A. and Palmer, C.C.. 2006. ‘The Importance of Historical Corpora, Reliability, and Reading’. In: Facchinetti, R. and M. Rissanen (eds.). Corpus-Based Studies of Diachronic English. Bern, New York etc.: Peter Lang; 17–34.Google Scholar

Dance, R. 2002. Review of Kristensson 2001. Notes and Queries, September 2002: 398–399.Google Scholar

Darby, H.C. and Versey, G.R.. 1975. Domesday Gazetteer. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

d’Ardenne, S.R.T.O. 1961 (for 1960). Þe liflade ant te passiun of Seinte Iuliene. Early English Text Society, Original Series 248. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dauer, R. 1983. ‘Stress-timing and Syllable-timing Reanalysed’. Journal of Phonetics 11: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daunt, M. 1939. ‘Old English Sound-Changes Reconsidered in Relation to Scribal Tradition and Practice’. Transactions of the Philological Society 38/1: 108–137.Google Scholar

Davidsen-Nielsen, N. 1972. English Phonetics. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar

Davis, B.L. et al. 2000. ‘Prosodic Correlates of Stress in Babbling: An Acoustical Study’. Child Development 71 /5: 1258–1270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, N. 1968. Review of Kristensson 1967. Notes and Queries 1968, Vol. 15, No. 7: 270–272.Google Scholar

Davis, N. and Wrenn, C.L. (eds.). 1962. English and Medieval Studies Presented to J.R.R. Tolkien on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Denison, D. 1999. ‘Slow, Slow, Quick, Quick, Slow: The Dance of Language Change’. In: López, A.B. et al. (eds.). ‘Woonderous Ænglissce’, SELIM Studies in Medieval English Language. Universidade de Vigo; 51–64.Google Scholar

Dieth, E. 1932. A Grammar of the Buchan Dialect. Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar

Dinkin, A. and Labov, W.. 2007. ‘Bridging the Gap: Dialect Boundaries and Regional Allegiance in Upstate New York’. Paper read at the Penn Linguistics Colloquium 31, 24 February 2007.Google Scholar

Dobranski, S.B. 2005. Readers and Authorship in Early Modern England. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dobson, E.J. 1955. ‘Early Modern Standard English’. Transactions of the Philological Society 54:1: 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobson, E.J. 1961. Review of Stanley 1960. Notes and Queries 206, Nos. 10, 11, 12.Google Scholar

Dobson, E.J. 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700, Vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dobson, E. 1969. ‘Notes on Sound-Change and Phoneme-Theory’. Brno Studies in English, Volume Eight. Brno; 43–48.Google Scholar

Donegan, P.J. 1985. On the Natural Phonology of Vowels. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Donegan, P.J. Unpublished conference paper. ‘The English Vowel Shift: A Typological Perspective’.Google Scholar

Durian, D. and Gordon, M.J.. 2011. ‘What are we talking about when we talk about vowel shifts’. Paper presented at NWAV 40, 30 October 2011, Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Durian, D. 2012. A New Perspective on Vowel Variation across the 19th and 20th Centuries in Columbus, OH. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Eaton, R. and Koopman, W.. 1987. ‘Introduction’. In: Koopman, et al. 1987; 1–10.Google Scholar

Eaton, R. et al. (eds.). 1985. Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ek, K-G. 1972. The Development of OE ȳ̌ and ēo in South-Eastern Middle English. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Ekwall, E. 1975. A History of Modern English Sounds and Morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eliasson, S. 2010. ‘Kedjeförskjutningen av långa bakre vokaler och svenskans «tionde» vokal’. Studier i svenska språkets historia 11: 127–136.Google Scholar

Endresen, R.T. 1988. Fonetikk: ei elementær innføring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Facchinetti, R. and Rissanen, M.. 2006. Corpus-Based Studies of Diachronic English. Bern, New York etc.: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisiak, J. (ed.) 1997. Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, K. 1981. A Pronouncing Dictionary of English Place-Names. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Frankis, J. 1986. ‘The Great Vowel-Shift and Other Vowel-Shifts’. In: Nixon, G. and Honey, J. (eds.). An Historic Tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in Memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge; 133–137.Google Scholar

Gimson, A.C. 1970. An introduction to the pronunciation of English. London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar

Gnanadesikan, A.E. 1997. Phonology with ternary scales. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Gordon, M.J. 2000. ‘Tales of the Northern Cities’. American Speech, 75, 4: 412–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, M.J. 2001. Small-Town Values and Big-City Vowels: A Study of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan. Publication of the American Dialect Society. Number 84. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Gradon, P. 1962. ‘Studies in Late West-Saxon Labialization and Delabialization’. In: Davis, N. and Wrenn, C.L. (eds.). English and Medieval Studies Presented to J.R.R. Tolkien on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday. London: George Allen and Unwin; 63–76.Google Scholar

Gradon, P. 1979. The Ayenbite of Inwyt. Vol. II. Early English Text Society, Original Series 278. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grossman, R.B. et al. 2010. ‘Lexical and Affective Prosody in Children with High-Functioning Autism’. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53: 778–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guy, G. 1994. ‘The Phonology of Variation’. In: Beals, K. et al. (eds.). CLS 30. Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Volume 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory; 133–149.Google Scholar

Hajek, J. 1997. Universals of Sound Change in Nasalization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hanham, A. 1975. The Cely Letters 1472–1488. Early English Text Society, Original Series 273. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, J. 1569. An Orthographie, Conteyning the Due Order and Reason, Howe to Write or Paint Thimage of Mannes Voice, Most Like to the Life or Nature. London.Google Scholar

Haugen, E. 1970. ‘The Language History of Scandinavia: A Profile of Problems’. In: Benediktsson, H. (ed.). The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics. Reykjavik: Vísindafélag Íslendinga; 41–79.Google Scholar

Haugen, E. 1976. The Scandinavian Languages. An Introduction to their History. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Haugen, E. and Markey, T.L.. 1972. The Scandinavian Languages. Fifty Years of Linguistic Research (1918–1968). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Heltveit, T. 1953. Studies in English Demonstrative Pronouns. A Contribution to the History of English Morphology. Oslo: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar

Hickey, R., Kytö, M., Lancashire, I. and Rissanen, M.. 1997. Tracing the Trail of Time. Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Hogg, R.M. 1983. ‘The Sound of Words: Some Phonological Influences on English Vocabulary’. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 66 /1; 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogg, R.M. 1992. A Grammar of Old English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hogg, R.M. 1997. ‘Using the Future to Predict the Past: Old English Dialectology in the Light of Middle English Place-Names’. In: Fisiak, J. (ed.). Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holthaus, E. 1885. ‘Beiträge zur Geschichte der englischen Vokale’. Anglia 8: 86–144.Google Scholar

Hudson, A. 1969. ‘Review of Kristensson 1967’. The Review of English Studies, XX, 77: 68–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, A. 1989. ‘Review of Kristensson 1987’. The Review of English Studies, New Series, XV, 157: 104–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, R. 1997. ‘Inherent Variability and Linguistic Theory’. Cognitive Linguistics 8 /1: 73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, T. and Benskin, M. (eds.). 2001. Three Receptaria from Medieval England. The languages of medicine in the fourteenth century. Medium Ævum Monographs, New Series XXI. Oxford: Society for the Study of Mediaeval Languages and Literature.Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1909 [4th ed. 1928]. A Modern English Grammar, Part I. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Johannessen, J. et al. (eds.). 2003. På språkjakt – problemer og utfordringer i språkvitenskapelig datainnsamling. Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. A. 1980. A Synchronic and Historical View of Border Area Bimoric Vowel Systems. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. A. 1992. ‘English Vowel Shifting: One Great Vowel Shift or Two Small Vowel Shifts?’ Diachronica IX /2: 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, R.C. 1987. Orthographia Gallica. Anglo-Norman Text Society, Plain Texts Series 5. Oxford: Express Litho Service.Google Scholar

Jones, C. 1989. A History of English Phonology. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Jordan, R. 1968. Handbuch der mittelenglischen Grammatik: Lautlehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar

Kastovsky, D. et al. (eds.). 1988. Luick Revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Kitson, P. 1998. ‘Review Article of Kristensson 1995’. NOMINA 21: 169–178.Google Scholar

Koopman, W. et al. (eds.). 1987. Explanation and Linguistic Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kristensson, G. 1967. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350. The Six Northern Counties and Lincolnshire [SMED1]. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar

Kristensson, G. 1976. ‘Lay Subsidy Rolls and Dialect Geography’. English Studies 57: 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristensson, G. 1987. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The West Midland Counties [SMED2]. Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Kristensson, G. 1995. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The East Midland Counties [SMED3]. Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Kristensson, G. 1997. ‘The Old English Anglian/Saxon Boundary Revisited’. In: Fisiak, J. (ed.) Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristensson, G. 2001. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The Southern Counties. I. Vowels (except Diphthongs) [SMED4]. Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Kristensson, G. 2002. A Survey of Middle English Dialects 1290–1350: The Southern Counties. II. Diphthongs and Consonants [SMED5]. Lund University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, S.M. and Quirk, R.. 1953. ‘Some recent interpretations of Old English digraph spellings’, Language 29. Reprinted in Quirk 1968; 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kytö, M. and Rissanen, M.. 1997. ‘Introduction. Language analysis and diachronic corpora’. In: Hickey, R., et al. (eds.). Tracing the Trail of Time. Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 9–22.Google Scholar

Kytö, M., Rissanen, M. and Wright, S. (eds.). 1994. Corpora Across the Centuries. Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on English Diachronic Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kökeritz, H. 1932. The Phonology of the Suffolk Dialect. Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckeri.Google Scholar

Kökeritz, H. 1953. Shakespeare’s Pronunciation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Kökeritz, H. 1954. A Guide to Chaucer’s Pronunciation. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1996. ‘The Organization of Dialect Diversity in North America’. Paper read at the ICSLP4, the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing at Philadelphia, 6 October 1996.Google Scholar

Labov, W. 2002. ‘West Germanic vs. North Germanic: insights from the study of chain shifts in progress’. Paper read at the annual meeting of Norsk forening for språkvitenskap, 7 May 2002, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Labov, W., Yaeger, M., and Steiner, R.. 1972. A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar

Labov, W., Ash, S. and Boberg, C.. 1997. ‘A National Map of the Regional Dialects of American English’. URL: www.ling.upenn.edu/phono_atlas/NationalMap/NationalMap.htmlGoogle Scholar

Labov, W., Ash, S., and Boberg, C.. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladefoged, P. 1962. Elements of Acoustic Phonetics. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. 1982. A C5b ourse in phonetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. 2005 [2nd ed.]. Vowels and Consonants. Malden, Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell.Google Scholar

LAEME, see Laing, M. 2008.Google Scholar

Laing, M. (ed.). 1989. Middle English Dialectology: essays on some principles and problems. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar

Laing, M. 1993. Catalogue of Sources for a Linguistic Atlas of Early Medieval English. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar

Laing, M. 1994. ‘The Linguistic Analysis of Medieval Vernacular Texts: Two Projects at Edinburgh’. In: Kytö, M. et al. (eds.). Corpora Across the Centuries. Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on English Diachronic Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laing, M. 1995. ‘A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English’. Medieval English Studies Newsletter 33. University of Tokyo; 1–8.Google Scholar

Laing, M. 1999. ‘Confusion wrs Confounded: Litteral Substitution Sets in Early Middle English Writing Systems’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100: 251–270.Google Scholar

Laing, M. 2000. ‘“Never the Twain Shall Meet”: Early Middle English – the East West divide’. In: Taavitsainen, I. et al. (eds.). Placing Middle English in Context. Topics in English Linguistics Series. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 97–124.Google Scholar

Laing, M. 2008. A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English. University of Edinburgh. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme1/laeme1.htmlGoogle Scholar

Laing, M. and Lass, R.. 2003. ‘Tales of the 1001 Nists: The Phonological Implications of Litteral Substitution Sets in Some Thirteenth-Century South-West Midland Texts’. English Language and Linguistics 7.2: 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laing, M. and Williamson, K.. 1994. Speaking in Our Tongues. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar

LALME, see McIntosh, Samuels, Benskin et al. 1986.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 1974. ‘Linguistic Orthogenesis; Scots Vowel Quantity and the English Length Conspiracy’. York Papers in Linguistics 4: 7–26.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 1976. English Phonology and Phonological Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lass, R. (ed.). 1969. Approaches to English Historical Linguistics. An Anthology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 1980. On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 1987a. ‘Language, Speakers, History and Drift’. In: Koopman, W. et al. (eds.). Explanation and Linguistic Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 151–176.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 1987b. ‘On sh*tting the Door in Early Modern English: A Reply to Professor Samuels’. In: Koopman, W. et al. (eds.). Explanation and Linguistic Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 251–256.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 1988. ‘Vowel Shifts, Great and Otherwise: Remarks on Stockwell and Minkova’. In: Kastovsky, D. et al. (eds.). Luick Revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag; 395–410.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 1990. ‘What, if anything, was the Great Vowel Shift?’ Paper read at the Sixth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics; 144–155.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 1992. ‘The Early Modern English Short Vowels Noch Einmal, Again’. Diachronica IX /1: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lass, R. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lass, R. 2009. ‘On Schwa: Synchronic Prelude and Historical Fugue’. In: Minkova, D. (ed.) Phonological Weakness in English. From Old to Present-Day English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 47–77.Google Scholar

Lass, R. and Laing, M.. 2005. ‘Are Front Rounded Vowels Retained in West Midland Middle English?’. In: Ritt, and Schendl, 2005; 280–290.Google Scholar

Lass, R. 2010. ‘In Celebration of eEarly Middle English “h”’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 111: 357–366.Google Scholar

Lass, R. and Wright, S.. 1985. ‘The South African Chain-Shift: Order Out of Chaos?’ In: Eaton, R. et al. (eds.). Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 137–161.Google Scholar

Liebl, C. 2006. ‘The A and O of a medieval English Sound-Change: Prolegomena to a Study of the Origins and Early Geographical Diffusion of /ɑ:/ > /ɔ:/’. In: Ritt, N. et al. (eds.). Medieval English and Its Heritage. Structure, Meaning and Mechanisms of Change. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 19–35.+/ɔ:/’.+In:+Ritt,+N.+et+al.+(eds.).+Medieval+English+and+Its+Heritage.+Structure,+Meaning+and+Mechanisms+of+Change.+Frankfurt+am+Main:+Peter+Lang;+19–35.>Google Scholar

Liljencrants, J. and Lindblom, B.. 1972. ‘Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast’. Language, 48, 4: 839–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorentz, O. 1996. ‘Length and Correspondence in Scandinavian’. Nordlyd 24: 111–128.Google Scholar

Łubowicz, A. 2011. ‘Ch. 73. Chain Shifts’. In: van Oostendorp, M. et al. (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. III. Oxford: Blackwell 1717–1735.Google Scholar

Luick, K. 1896. Untersuchungen zur englischen Lautgeschichte. Straßburg: Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luick, K. 1899. ‘Über die Diphthongierung van me. ū, ī und verwandte deutsche Erscheinungen’. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Litteraturen 53 /103: 267–277.Google Scholar

Luick, K. 1901. ‘Der Ursprung der neuenglischen AI- und AU-diphthonge’. Englische Studien 29: 405–411.Google Scholar

Luick, K. 1912. ‘Über die neuenglische Vokalverschiebung’. Englische Studien 45: 432–437.Google Scholar

Luick, K. 1914–1940. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache, Vol. I, Parts 1 and 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Luick, K. 1932. ‘Zur neuenglischen Lautgeschichte’. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen 1932: 89–90.Google Scholar

Lutz, A. 2004. ‘The First Push: A Prelude to the Great Vowel Shift’. Anglia, Band 122 (2004) Heft 2: 209–224.Google Scholar

Maci, S.M. 2006. ‘The Phonetic Representation of ME ī in Some Norfolk Works of the Late Fifteenth Century’. English Studies, 87, 2, April: 148–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majocha, E. 2005. Some early Middle English dialect features in the South-East Midlands; an onomastic study. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Majors, T. and Gordon, M.J.. 2008. ‘The [+spread] of the Northern Cities Shift’. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. Volume 14, Issue 2. Selected Papers from NWAV 36: 111–120.Google Scholar

Malsch, D.L. and Fulcher, R.. 1975. ‘Tensing and Syllabication in Middle English’. Language, 51, 2: 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markus, M. 1994. ‘The concept of ICAMET (Innsbruck Computer Archive of Middle English Texts). In: Kytö, M. et al. (eds.). Corpora Across the Centuries. Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on English Diachronic Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martín, M.A. 2002. ‘Old English <eo> in Middle Kentish Place-Names’. In: SELIM no. 10 2000: 55–75.Google Scholar

Martinet, A. 1952. ‘Function, Structure, and Sound Change’. Word 8: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinet, A. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques: traité de phonologie diachronique. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar

McCarthy, C. 2010a. ‘The Northern Cities Shift in Real Time: Evidence from Chicago’. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. Volume 15, Issue 2. Selected papers from NWAV 37: 101–110.Google Scholar

McCarthy, C. 2010b. ‘The Northern Cities Shift in Chicago’. Journal of English Linguistics XX (X): 1–22.Google Scholar

McClure, P. 1973. ‘Lay Subsidy Rolls and Dialect Phonology’. In: Sandgren, F. (ed.). Otium et Negotium. Studies in Onomatology and Library Science presented to Olof von Feilitzen. Acta Bibliothecae Regiae Stockholmiensis XVI; 188–194.Google Scholar

McEnery, T. and Wilson, A.. 2001 [2nd ed.]. Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

McIntosh, A. 1956. ‘The Analysis of Written Middle English’. Transactions of the Philological Society: 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, A. 1963. ‘A New Approach to Middle English Dialectology’. English Studies 44: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, A. 1969. ‘Review article of Kristensson 1967’. Medium Ævum 38 /2: 210–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, A., Samuels, M.L., Benskin, M. et al. 1986. A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English, Vols. I-IV. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar

McMahon, A. 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMahon, A. 2000. Lexical Phonology and the history of English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meurman-Solin, A. 1997. ‘Text Profiles in the Study of Language Variation and Change’. In: Hickey, R. et al. (eds.). Tracing the Trail of Time. Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop. Amsterdam: Rodopi 199–214.Google Scholar

Minkova, D. 1982. ‘The Environment for Open Syllable Lengthening in Middle English’. Folia Linguistica Historica III /1: 29–58.Google Scholar

Minkova, D. 1985. ‘Of Rhyme and Reason: Some Foot-Governed Quantity Changes in English’. In: Eaton, R. et al. (eds.). Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 163–178.Google Scholar

Minkova, D. 1987. ‘The Trajectory Constraint and “Irregular” Rhymes in Middle English’. Review article. Folia Linguistica Historica VIII /1–2: 481–501.Google Scholar

Minkova, D. 1997. ‘Constraint Ranking in Middle English Stress-Shifting’. English Language and Linguistics 1 /1: 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minkova, D. 2014. A Historical Phonology of English. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, A.G. and Delbridge, A.. 1965. The Pronunciation of English in Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar

Moore, S., Meech, S.B. and Whitehall, H.. 1935. ‘Middle English Dialect Characteristics and Dialect Boundaries’. Essays and Studies in English and Comparative Literature, Vol. 13. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1–60.Google Scholar

Mossé, F. 1945. Manuel de l’anglais du Moyen-Âge, I. Vieil-anglais. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar

Nevanlinna, S. 1999. Review Article of Kristensson 1995. Studia Neophilologica 71: 253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogura, M., Wang, W.S-Y. and Cavalli-Sforza, L.L.. 1991. ‘The Development of Middle English ī in England: a Study in Dynamic Dialectology’. In: Eckert, P. (ed.). New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change. New York: Academic Press; 63–106.Google Scholar

Ogura, M. 1990. Dynamic Dialectology. A Study of Language in Time and Space. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar

Ogura, M. 1995. ‘The Development of Middle English ī and ū: A reply to Labov (1992, 1994)’. Diachronica 12: 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortega-Llebaria, M. and Prieto, P.. 2010. ‘Acoustic Correlates of Stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish’. Language and Speech 54 /1: 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orton, H. 1933. The Phonology of a South Durham Dialect. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.Google Scholar

Orton, H. and Dieth, E.. 1962. The Survey of English Dialects. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar

van Oostendorp, M. et al. (eds.). 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. III. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peacock, R.B. 1869. A Glossary of the Dialect of the Hundred of Lonsdale, North and South of the Sands, in the County of Lancaster. Asher & Co. for the Philological Society.Google Scholar

Peeters, W.J.M. 1991. Diphthong Dynamics. Doctoral dissertation, the University of Utrecht. Kampen: Mondiss.Google Scholar

Pelt, J. 1980. ‘Vowel Shift and Open Syllable Lengthening: A Length Conspiracy in Dutch’. In: Anderson, J.M. and C.J. Ewen (eds.). Studies in Dependency Phonology. Ludwigsburg Studies in Language and Linguistics 4. Ludwigsburg: R.O.U. Strauch; 61–101.Google Scholar

Penzl, H. 1957. ‘The Evidence for Phonemic Change’. In: Pulgram, E. (ed.) Studies Presented to Joshua Whatmough on His Sixtieth Birthday. The Hague: Mouton; 193–208.Google Scholar

Phillips, B.S. 1997. ‘The Peterborough Chronicle diphthongs.’ In: Fisiak, J. (ed.) Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, B. 2006a. Word Frequency and Lexical Diffusion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, B. 2006b. ‘Word Frequency Effects in the Great Vowel Shift’. Paper read at the 14th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Bergamo, Italy, 21–25 August 2006.Google Scholar

Pilch, H. 1997. ‘Middle English Phonetics: A systematic survey including notes on Irish and Welsh Loanwords.’ In: Fisiak, J. (ed.) Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, M.K. 1934. From Latin to Modern French With Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Prins, A.A. 1942a. ‘A Few Early Examples of the Great Vowel Shift’. Neophilologus 27: 134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prins, A.A. 1942b. ‘The Great Vowel Shift Reconsidered’. English Studies 24: 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prins, A.A. 1972. A History of English Phonemes. Leiden University Press.Google Scholar

Prokosch, E. 1939. A Comparative Germanic Grammar. Yale University: the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar

Quirk, R. 1968. Essays on the English Language, Medieval and Modern. London and Harlow: Longmans.Google Scholar

Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 2006. ‘Leaders of Linguistic Change in Early Modern England’. In: Facchinetti, R. and M. Rissanen (eds.). Corpus-Based Studies of Diachronic English. Bern, New York etc.: Peter Lang; 115–134.Google Scholar

van Reenen, P. and Wijnands, A.. 1989. ‘Early Diphthongizations of Palatalized West Germanic [u:]. The Spelling uy in Middle Dutch’. In: Aertsen, H. and Jeffers, R.J. (eds.) 1993. Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 389–415.Google Scholar

Ringgaard, K. 1982. ‘On the Problem of Merger’. In: Maher, J.P. et al. (eds.). Papers from the 3rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 387–395.Google Scholar

Rissanen, M. 1994. ‘The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts’. In: Kytö, M. et al. (eds.). Corpora Across the Centuries. Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on English Diachronic Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritt, N. 1994. Quantity Adjustment. Vowel Lengthening and Shortening in Early Middle English. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritt, N. and Schendl, H. (eds.). 2005. Rethinking Middle English: Linguistic and Literary Approaches. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Ritt, N. et al. (eds.). 2006. Medieval English and Its Heritage. Structure, Meaning and Mechanisms of Change. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Samuels, B.D. 2006. Nothing to Lose but Their Chains: Rethinking Vocalic Chain Shifting. Unpublished BA thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Samuels, M.L. 1963. ‘Some Applications of Middle English Dialectology’. English Studies 44: 81–94. Reprinted in Lass 1969: 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, M.L. 1971. ‘Kent and the Low Countries: Some Linguistic Evidence’. In: Aitken, A.J., McIntosh, A. and Pálsson, H. (eds.). Edinburgh Studies in English and Scots. London: Longman; 3–19.Google Scholar

Samuels, M.L. 1972. Linguistic Evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, M.L. 1985. ‘The Great Scandinavian Belt’. In: Eaton, R. et al. (eds.). Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, 10–13 April 1985. Amsterdam: Benjamins; 269–281. Reprinted in Laing 1989: 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, M.L. 1987a. ‘The Status of the Functional Approach’. In: Koopman, W. et al. (eds.). Explanation and Linguistic Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 239–250.Google Scholar

Samuels, M.L. 1987b. ‘A Brief Rejoinder to Professor Lass’. In: Koopman, W. et al. (eds.). Explanation and Linguistic Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 257–258.Google Scholar

Schane, S.A. 1990. ‘Lowered Height, Laxness, and Retracted Tongue Root: Different Manifestations of Phonological aperture’. Word 41 /1: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlemilch, W. 1914. Beiträge zur Sprache und Orthographie spätaltenglischer Sprachdenkmäler der Übergangszeit. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Sievers, E. 1850. Grundzüge der Phonetik: Zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Hartel.Google Scholar

Sievers, E. and Brunner, K. (rev.). 1942. Altenglische Grammatik. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Sievers, E. and Cook, A. (transl. and rev.). 1968. An Old English Grammar. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Sisam, K. 1962. Fourteenth Century Verse and Prose. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sivertsen, E. 1960. Cockney Phonology. Oslo University Press.Google Scholar

Skauptrup, P. 1944–70. Det danske sprogs historie. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar

Smith, J.J. 1993. ‘Dialectal Variation in Middle English and the Actuation of the Great Vowel Shift’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen XCIV /3–4: 259–277.Google Scholar

Smith, J.J. 1994. ‘The Great Vowel Shift in the North of England, and Some Spellings in Manuscripts of Chaucer’s Reeve’s Tale’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 95: 433–437.Google Scholar

Smith, J.J. 1996. An Historical Study of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smith, J.J. 2006. ‘Phonaesthesia, Ablaut and the history of the English demonstratives’. In: Ritt, et al. 2006: 1–17.Google Scholar

Smith, J.J. 2007. Sound Change and the History of English. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smithers, G.V. 1952 and 1957. Kyng Alisaunder. Early English Text Society, Original Series 227 and 237. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stanley, E.G. 1960. The Owl and the Nightingale. Nelson’s Medieval and Renaissance Library. London.Google Scholar

Stanley, E.G. 1972. The Owl and the Nightingale. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Stenbrenden, G.F. 1996. The Great Vowel Shift: Problems of Reification and Analysis. Unpublished Cand.Philol. thesis. University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Stenbrenden, G.F. 1999. ‘A Reassessment of the Chronology and Regional Spread of Certain English Long-Vowel Changes, ca. 1250–1500’. In: López, A.B. et al. (eds.). ‘Woonderous Ænglissce’. SELIM Studies in Medieval English Language. Universidade de Vigo: Servicio de Publicacións; 161–174.Google Scholar

Stenbrenden, G.F. 2003a. ‘On the Interpretion of Early Evidence for ME Vowel-Change’. In: Blake, B. and Burridge, K. (eds.). Historical Linguistics 2001. Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001. John Benjamins; 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenbrenden, G.F. 2003b. ‘On the inception and spread of early ME ā > ǭ – some observations’. Paper read at the 1st International Conference on English Historical Dialectology, Bergamo, 4–6 September 2003.+ǭ+–+some+observations’.+Paper+read+at+the+1st+International+Conference+on+English+Historical+Dialectology,+Bergamo,+4–6+September+2003.>Google Scholar

Stenbrenden, G.F. 2009. ‘An investigation into the development of OE ō and lengthened y in Middle English.’ Paper read at the Historical Language and Literacy in the North Sea Area conference, Stavanger, 26–28 August 2009.Google Scholar

Stenbrenden, G.F. 2010. The Chronology and Regional Spread of Long-Vowel Changes in English, c. 1150–1500. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Stenbrenden, G.F. 2013. ‘The Diphthongisation of ME ū: the Spelling Evidence’. In: Andersen, G. and Bech, K. (eds.) English Corpus Linguistics: Variation in Time, Space and Genre: Selected Papers from Icame 32 (Language & Computers). Rodopi; 53–67.Google Scholar

Stenroos, M. 2005. ‘Spelling Conventions and Rounded Front Vowels in the Poems of William Herebert.’ In: Ritt, N. and H. Schendl (eds.). Rethinking Middle English: Linguistic and Literary Approaches. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 291–308.Google Scholar

Steponavičius, A. 1997. ‘Middle (and Old) English Prerequisites for the Great Vowel Shift’. In: Fisiak, J. (ed.) Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steponavičius, A. 2005. ‘The Great Vowel Shift as a Paradigmatic Restructuring of the Late ME Vowel System’. In: Ritt, N. and Schendl, H. (eds.). Rethinking Middle English: Linguistic and Literary Approaches. Frankfurt am Main, etc.: Peter Lang; 309–316.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1952. Chaucerian Graphemics and Phonemics: A Study in Historical Methodology. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Virginia.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1960. ‘The Middle English “Long Close” and “Long Open” Mid Vowels’. In: University of Texas Studies in Literature and Language 2: 529–538.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1964. ‘On the Utility of an Overall Pattern in Historical English Phonology’. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton; 663–671.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1972. ‘Problems in the Interpretation of the Great English Vowel Shift’. In: Smith, M.E. (ed.) 1972. Studies in Linguistics in Honor of George L. Trager; 344–362. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1978. ‘Perseverance in the English Vowel Shift’. In: Fisiak, J. (ed.) 1978. Recent Developments in Historical Phonology. The Hague: Mouton; 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1985. ‘Assessment of Alternative Explanations of the Middle English Phenomenon of High Vowel Lowering when Lengthened in the Open Syllable’. In: Eaton, R. et al. (eds.). Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 303–318.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 2006. ‘The Status of Late Middle English <ei> Spellings as Early Evidence of the English Vowel Shift’. In: Schaefer, U. (ed.). The Beginnings of Standardization: Language and Culture in Fourteenth-Century England. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang; 175–180.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. and Minkova, D.. 1988a. ‘The English Vowel Shift: problems of coherence and explanation’. In: Kastovsky, D. et al. (eds.). Luick Revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag; 355–394.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1988b. ‘A Rejoinder to Lass’. In: Kastovsky, D. et al. (eds.). Luick Revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag; 411–417.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1990. ‘The Early Modern English Vowels, More o’ Lass’. Diachronica VII /2: 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stockwell, R.P. 1997. ‘On Drifts and Shifts’. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia XXXI: 283–303.Google Scholar

Strang, B. 1970. A History of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Strang, B. 1980. ‘The ecology of the English monosyllable’. In: Greenbaum, S. et al. (eds.). Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk. London: Longman; 277–293.Google Scholar

Stürzinger, J. 1884. Orthographia Gallica. Ältester Traktat über französische Aussprache und Orthographie nach vier Handschriften zum ersten Mal hrsg. Altfranzösische Bibliothek, 8. volume. Heilbronn: Henninger.Google Scholar

Sundby, G. 1963. Studies in the Middle English Dialect Material of Worcestershire Records. Bergen and Oslo: Norwegian Universities Press.Google Scholar

Sweet, H. 1888. A History of English Sounds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Sweet, H. 1953. Sweet’s Anglo-Saxon Primer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Söderholm, T. 1970. The End-Rhymes of Marvell, Cowley, Crashaw, Lovelace and Vaughan. Acta Academiae Aboensis, Ser. A, Vol. 39, nr. 2. Ekenäs.Google Scholar

Torp, A. and Vikør, L.S.. 1993. Hovuddrag i norsk språkhistorie. Ad Notam Gyldendal.Google Scholar

Versloot, A.P. 2008. Mechanisms of Language Change: Vowel Reduction in 15th Century West Frisian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Wallenberg, J.K. 1931. Kentish Place-Names. A Topographical and Etymological Study of the Place-Name Material in Kentish Charters Dated before the Conquest. Uppsala: A.-B. Lundequistska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar

Wallenberg, J.K. 1934. The Place-Names of Kent. Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckeriaktiebolag.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U., Labov, W., and Herzog, M.I.. 1968. ‘Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change’. In: Lehmann, W.P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.). Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin and London: University of Texas Press; 95–195.Google Scholar

Wells, J.C. 1982. Accents of English I. An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weƚna, J. 1988. ‘Historische Grammatik and Middle English diphthongal systems.’ In: Kastovsky, D. et al. (eds.). Luick Revisited. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag; 419–433.Google Scholar

Weƚna, J. 2004. ‘Middle English ē-Raising: a Prelude to the Great Vowel Shift’. Studia Anglica Posnanienska 40: 75–83.Google Scholar

Western, A. 1912. ‘Über die neuenglische Vokalverschiebung’. Englische Studien 45: 1–8.Google Scholar

Whitehall, H. 1935. ‘Some Fifteenth-Century Spellings From the Nottingham Records’. In: Essays and Studies in English and Comparative Literature; 61–71. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Widén, B. 1949. Studies on the Dorset Dialect. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar

Williamson, K. 2006 (ms.). ‘Further reflections on the outcomes of Northern Fronting in Older Scots’. Paper read at 14 ICEHL, University of Bergamo, 21–25 August, 2006.Google Scholar

Winters, M.E. 1997. ‘Kurylowicz, Analogical Change, and Cognitive Grammar’. Cognitive Linguistics 8 /4: 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfe, P.M. 1972. Linguistic Change and the Great Vowel Shift in English. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wrenn, C.L. 1943. ‘The Value of Spelling as Evidence’. Transactions of the Philological Society: 14–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, J. 1905. The English Dialect Grammar. Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, New York and Toronto: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar

Wright, J. 1924. An Elementary Historical New English Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, J. and Wright, E.M.. 1925. Old English Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, J. 1928. An Elementary Middle English Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, L. 1996. Sources of London English: medieval Thames vocabulary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wyld, H.C. 1913–14a. ‘The Treatment of OE. ȳ̆ in the Dialects of the Midland, and SE. Counties, in ME’. Englische Studien 47: 1–58.Google Scholar

Wyld, H.C. 1913–14b. ‘Old English ȳ̆ in the Dialects of the South, and South Western Counties in Middle English.’ Englische Studien 47: 145–166.Google Scholar

Wyld, H.C. 1927. A Short History of English. Third edition. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Wyld, H.C. 1936. A History of Modern Colloquial English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Zachrisson, R.E. 1913. Pronunciation of English Vowels 1400–1700. Göteborg: Wald. Zachrissons Boktryckeri.Google Scholar

Zachrisson, R.E. 1970. The English Pronunciation at Shakespeare’s Time as Taught by William Bullokar: With word-lists from all his works. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar