Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T21:54:56.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2022

Emilia A. Barbiero
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Letters in Plautus
Writing Between the Lines
, pp. 216 - 227
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J.N. (1982) The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Agostiniani, L. (1982) Le ‘iscrizioni parlanti’ dell’Italia antica. Firenze: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
Alfonsi, L. (1969) “Dal ΔΙΣ ΕΞΠΑΤΩΝ alle Bacchides,” Aegyptus 49.1: 7581.Google Scholar
Altman, J.G. (1982) Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Ammannati, G. (2001) “Considerazioni filologico-paleografiche in margine a un passo plautino (Pseud. 22–30),” MD 47: 153–63.Google Scholar
Anderson, W.S. (1979) “Plautus’ Trinummus: The Absurdity of Officious Morality,” Traditio 35: 333–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W.S. (1993) Barbarian Play: Plautus’ Roman Comedy. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Arnott, W.G. (1993) “Comic openings,” in Slater, N.W. and Zimmermann, B. (eds), Intertextualität in der griechisch-römischen Komödie. Stuttgart: M und P, Verl. für Wiss. und Forschung, 1429.Google Scholar
Arnott, W.G. (1995) “The Opening of Plautus’ Curculio: Comic Business and Mime,” in Benz, , Stärk, and Vogt-Spira, (1995), 185–92.Google Scholar
Arnott, W.G. (2001) “Plautus’ Epidicus and Greek Comedy,” in Auhagen, (2001a), 71–90.Google Scholar
Arnott, W.G. (2002) “Diphilus’ Κληρούμενοι and Plautus’ Casina,” in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds), Lecturae Sarsinates VI. Casina (Sarsina, 28 settembre, 2002). Urbino: QuattroVenti, 2344.Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (ed) (2001a) Studien zu Plautus’ Epidicus. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2001b) “Toxilus und Lemniselenis: ein paradoxes Liebespaar,” in Faller, (2001a), 95–111.Google Scholar
Austin, R.G. (ed) (1964) P. Vergili Maronis: Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bader, B. (1970) “Der verlorene Anfang der plautinischen “Bacchides”,” RhM 113.4: 304–23.Google Scholar
Bain, D. (1979) “Plautus vortit barbare. Plautus, Bacchides 526–61 and Menander, Dis exapaton 102–12,” in West, D. and Woodman, T. (eds), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press, 1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. (2017) “Trust and Fame: The Seal of Theognis,” in Bakker, E. (ed), Authorship and Greek Song: Authority, Authenticity, and Performance. Leiden: Brill, 99121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbiero, E.A. (2016) “Dissing the Δὶς ἐξαπατῶν: Comic One-Upmanship in Plautus’ Bacchides,” Mnemosyne 69.4: 648–67.Google Scholar
Barbiero, E.A. (2018) “Myth, Letters and the Poetics of Ancestry in Plautus’ Bacchides,” Ramus 47.1: 226.Google Scholar
Barbiero, E.A. (2020a) “Alii rhetorica tongent: Plautus and Public Speech,” in Dutsch, and Franko, (2020), 393–406.Google Scholar
Barbiero, E.A. (2020b) “What’s New? The Possibilities of Novelty in Plautus’ Casina,” in Demetriou, C. and Papaioannou, S. (eds), Plautus’ Erudite Comedy: New Insights into the Work of a Doctus Poeta. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 5174.Google Scholar
Barbiero, E.A. (forthcoming) “Let’s Get Real: Ekphrasis, Reality and Fiction in Pliny’s Epistles,” in Jackson, C and Soldo, J (eds), Res vera, res ficta: Fictionality in Ancient Epistolography.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. (1969) “Plauto e il ‘metateatro’ antico,” Il Verri 31: 113–30.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (ed and trans) (1986) Plautus: Bacchides. Oak Park, il: Bolchazy-Carducci.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (1995) “Plautus’ Pseudolus as Improvisatory Drama,” in Benz, , Stärk, and Vogt-Spira, (1995), 55–70.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. (2005) “Plautine Farce and Plautine Freedom: An Essay on the Value of Metatheatre,” in Batstone, W. and Tissol, G. (eds), Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature: Essays Presented to William S. Anderson on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. New York: Lang, 1346.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, nc: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Benz, L. (1990) “Megaronides Censorius: Eine anticatonische Konzeption im plautinischen Trinummus?” in Blänsdorf, J. (ed), Theater und Gesellschaft im Imperium Romanum. Tübingen: Francke, 5568.Google Scholar
Benz, L. (2001) “Mimica convivia und das Sklavenbankett im plautinischen Persa,” in Faller, (2001a), 209–53.Google Scholar
Benz, L., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds) (1995) Plautus und die Tradition des Stegreifspiels: Festgabe für Eckard Lefèvre zum 60. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. (1968) Archaic Greek Gems. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Bork, H. (2018) A Rough Guide to Insult in Plautus. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bungard, C. (2020) “Metatheater and Improvisation in Plautus,” in Dutsch, and Franko, (2020), 237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, P.J. (2004) “Amicitia in Plautus: A Study of Roman Friendship Processes,” AJPh 125.2: 209–43.Google Scholar
Burzachechi, M. (1962) “Oggetti parlanti nelle epigrafi greche,” Epigraphica 24: 354.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.D. and Larsen, A.R. (eds) (2009) Early Modern Women and Transnational Communities of Letters. Burlington, va: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Castagna, L. (2009) “Il «Trinummus»: commedia dei tre soldi e del buon cuore,” in Blancato, M. and Nuzzo, G. (eds), La commedia latina: Modelli, forme, ideologia, fortuna: giornate siracusane nel teatro antico. Siracusa: Istituto nazionale del dramma antico, 1140.Google Scholar
Castelli, E. (2020) La nascita del titolo nella letteratura greca: Dall’epica arcaica alla prosa di età classica. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. (2013) Ancient Greek Letter Writing: A Cultural History (600 BC – 150 BC). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P., Doering, L., Fögen, T. and Gildenhard, I. (eds) (2018) Letters and Communities: Studies in the Socio-Political Dimensions of Ancient Epistolography. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cerri, G. (1991) “Il significato di sphregis in Teognide e la salvaguardia dell’autenticità testuale nel mondo antico,” QS 17.33: 2140.Google Scholar
Chiarini, G. (1979) La recita: Plauto, la farsa, la festa. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Chiarini, G. (1981) “Per la storia dell’esegesi plautina I. I versi didascalici della ‘Casina’ (prol.29–34),” Studi Classici e Orientali 31: 119–53.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. (ed) (2020) Plautus: Pseudolus. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J.R. (1976) “Structure and Symmetry in the Bacchides of Plautus,” TAPhA 106: 8596.Google Scholar
Clark, J.R. (2001–2) “Early Latin Handwriting and Plautus’ Pseudolus,” CJ 97.2: 183–9.Google Scholar
Collart, J. (ed) (1962) Curculio. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (1983) “Identità come appartenza nelle iscrizioni di possesso dell’Italia preromana,” Epigraphica 45: 4964.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (2004) “Monkey Business: Imitation, Authenticity, and Identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus,” ClAnt 23.2: 179207.Google Scholar
Copley, F.O. (1956) Exclusus Amator: A Study in Latin Love Poetry. Madison, wi: American Philological Association.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. (1989) “Plautine Elements in the Running-Slave Entrance Monologues?CQ 39.1: 148–63.Google Scholar
Dällenbach, L. (1977) Le récit spéculaire: Essai sur la mise en abyme. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Dällenbach, L. (1989) The Mirror in the Text. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Daly, L.W. (1943) “The Entitulature of Pre-Ciceronian Writings,” in Classical Studies in Honor of W.A. Oldfather. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2038.Google Scholar
Damen, M.L. (1992) “Translating Scenes: Plautus’ Adaptation of Menander’s Dis Exapaton,” Phoenix 46.3: 205–31.Google Scholar
Damen, M.L. (1995) “‘By the gods, boy … Stop bothering me! Can’t you tell Menander from Plautus?’ or How Dis Exapaton does not help us understand Bacchides,” Antichthon 29: 1529.Google Scholar
Danese, R.M. (2011) “La drammaturgia del ‘Persa’ fra ‘standards’ e originalità,” in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2011), 39–68.Google Scholar
Daybell, J. (2006) Women Letter-Writers in Tudor England. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daybell, J. and Gordon, A. (eds) (2016) Women and Epistolary Agency in Early Modern Culture, 1450–1690. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Del Corno, D. (ed) (1973) Bacchides. Torino: Marietti.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. (ed) (2011a) Plautus I: Amphitryon, The Comedy of Asses, The Pot of Gold, The Two Bacchises, The Captives. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. (ed) (2011b) Plautus II: Casina, The Casket Comedy, Curculio, Epidicus, The Two Menaechmuses. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1967) De la grammatologie. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1975) “Le facteur de la vérité,” Poétique 21: 96147.Google Scholar
Deschamps, L. (1980) “Épidaure ou Rome? A propos du Curculio de Plaute,” Platon 32: 144–77.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. (2002) Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Doering, L. (2018) “Configuring Addressee Communities in Ancient Jewish Letters: The Case of the Epistle of Baruch (2 Baruch 78–86),” in Ceccarelli, , Doering, , Fögen, and Gildenhard, (2018), 271–88.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G.E. (1952/1992) The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dutsch, D. and Franko, G. F. (eds) (2020) A Companion to Plautus. Malden, ma: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1997) “The Seal of Theognis,” in Edmunds, L. and Wallace, R. (eds), Poet, Public and Performance in Ancient Greece. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2948, 136–43.Google Scholar
Elderkin, G.Q. (1934) “The Curculio of Plautus,” AJA 38.1: 2936.Google Scholar
Faller, S. (ed) (2001a) Studien zu Plautus’ Persa. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Faller, S. (2001b) “Persisches im Persa,” in Faller, (2001a), 177–207.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1977) “Philemon’s Thesauros as a Dramatisation of Peripatetic Ethics,” Hermes 105.4: 406–21.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1981) “Plautus in Miniature: Compression and Distortion in the Epidicus,” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 3: 128.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Virgil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2010) “Crediting Pseudolus: Trust, Belief and the Credit Crunch in Plautus’ Pseudolus,” CPh 105.3: 281300.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016) Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G.R.F. (1987) Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferri, R. (2014) “The Reception of Plautus in Antiquity,” in Fontaine, and Scafuro, (2014), 767–82.Google Scholar
Foley, H. (1985) Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides. Ithaca, ny: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2010) Funny Words in Plautine Comedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2014a) “The Reception of Greek Comedy in Rome,” in Revermann, M. (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Comedy. Cambridge University Press, 404–23.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2014b) “Between Two Paradigms: Plautus,” in Fontaine, and Scafuro, (2014), 516–37.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A.C. (eds) (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1985) “The Seal of Theognis: The Politics of Authorship in Archaic Greece,” in Figueira, T. and Nagy, G. (eds), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 8295.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1922/2007) Plautine Elements in Plautus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frampton, S.A. (2019) Empire of Letters: Writing in Roman Literature and Thought from Lucretius to Ovid. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. (2013) “Comic Transformations of Paraclausithyron in Plautus’ Curculio,” in Papanghelis, T., Harrison, S.J. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 267–81.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S.J. and Manuwald, G. (eds) (2016) Roman Drama and Its Contexts. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frank, T. (1932) “Some Political Allusions in Plautus’ Trinummus,” AJPh 53.2: 152–6.Google Scholar
Friis Johansen, H. (1993) “A Poem by Theognis, Part II,” C&M 44: 529.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1988) Del buon uso della ricchezza: Saggi di storia economica e sociale del mondo antico. Milano: Guerini.Google Scholar
Gaggiotti, M. (1985) “Atrium regium – basilica (Aemilia): Una insospettata continuità storica e una chiave ideologica per la soluzione del problema dell’origine della basilica,” ARID 14: 5380.Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. (1970) “Die plautinischen ‘Bacchides’ und Menanders ‘Dis exapaton’,” Philologus 114.1–2: 5187.Google Scholar
Gatefin, E. (2014) “À l’intérieur de Seinfeld: La sitcom Jerry,” TV/Series 6: 138–59.Google Scholar
Gellar-Goad, T.H.M (2012) “The servus callidus and Ritual Imagery in Plautus’ Epidicus,” CJ 107.2: 149–64.Google Scholar
Gellar-Goad, T.H.M (2018) “Varro’s Bimarcus and Encounters with the Self in Plautus’s Epidicus and Amphitruo,” Arethusa 51: 117–35.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1987) Seuils. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Genette, G. and Maclean, M. (1991) “Introduction to the Paratext,” New Literary History 22.2: 261–72.Google Scholar
Germany, R. (2016) “Civic Reassignment of Space in the Truculentus,” in Frangoulidis, , Harrison, and Manuwald, (2016), 263–74.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. (1978) “Plautus’ Epidicus and the Case of the Missing Original,” TAPhA 108: 8191.Google Scholar
Goldberg, (2005) Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A.S. (1973) “TITVS MACCIVS PLAVTVS,” CQ 23.1: 7884.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A.S. (1995) “The Schizophrenic Lover and the Logic of Farce: Plautus’ Bacchides 500ff.,” in Benz, , Stärk, and Vogt-Spira, (1995), 97–106.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1965) “L’original du Curculio,” REL 43: 31–2.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1966) “Échos plautiniens d’histoire hellénistique,” in Chevallier, R. (ed), Mélanges d’archéologie et d’histoire offerts à André Piganiol. Paris: SEVPEN., 1731–41.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1969) “Analisi del Trinummus e gli albori della filosofia in Roma,” Dioniso 43: 363–75.Google Scholar
Grisolia, R. (1976) “A proposito delle Bacchidi di Plauto e del Dis Exapaton,” RAAN 51: 5378.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. (1990) Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2015) Laughing Awry: Plautus and Tragicomedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hallett, J.P. (1993) “Plautine Ingredients in the Performance of the Pseudolus,” CW 87.1: 21–6.Google Scholar
Hallett, J.P. (2006) “Gender, Class and Roman Rhetoric: Assessing the Writing of Plautus’ Phoenicium (Pseudolus 41–73),” Advances in the History of Rhetoric 9.1: 3354.Google Scholar
Hallett, J.P. (2011) “Ballio’s Brothel, Phoenicium’s Letter, and the Literary Education of Greco-Roman Prostitutes,” in Glazebrook, A. and Henry, M.M. (eds), Greek Prostitutes in the Ancient Mediterranean, 800 BCE – 200 CE. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 172–96.Google Scholar
Halporn, J. (1993) “Roman Comedy and Greek Models,” in Scodel, R. (ed), Theatre and Society in the Classical World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 191213.Google Scholar
Handley, E.W. (1968) Menander and Plautus: A Study in Comparison. London: H.K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Handley, E.W. (1975) “Plautus and His Public: Some Thoughts on New Comedy in Latin,” Dioniso 46: 117–32.Google Scholar
Hanses, M. (2020) “Men Among Monuments: Roman Topography and Roman Memory in Plautus’ Curculio,” CPh 115.4: 630–58.Google Scholar
Hardy, C.S. (2005) “The Parasite’s Daughter: Metatheatrical Costuming in Plautus’ Persa,” CW 99.1: 2533.Google Scholar
Harris, W.V. (1989/1991) Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hartkamp, R. (2001) “leno periit – Die Rolle des Kupplers Dordalus zwischen Ritual und Realität,” in Faller, (2001a), 113–38.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E. (1999) Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1985) “Booking the Return Trip: Ovid and Tristia 1,” PCPhS 31: 1332.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. (2007) “Better than Speech: Some Advantages of the Letter in the Second Sophistic,” in Morello, R. and Morrison, A.D. (eds), Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford University Press, 283300.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. (2014) “Epistolography,” in Hubbard, T. (ed), A Companion to Greek and Roman Sexualities. Malden, ma: Wiley-Blackwell, 470–85.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. and Rosenmeyer, P.A. (2013) “Introduction,” in Hodkinson, , Rosenmeyer, and Bracke, (2013), 1–36.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O., Rosenmeyer, P.A. and Bracke, E. (eds) (2013) Epistolary Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W. (1989) “Plautinisches in Plautus’ Persa,” Klio 71: 399407.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1981) “Some Problems of Titulature in Roman Literary History,” BICS 28: 103–14.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (ed) 2008 Virgil: Aeneid 2. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. (2007) “Theognis’ sphrēgis: Aristocratic Speech and the Paradoxes of Writing,” in Cooper, C. (ed), Politics of Orality. Leiden: Brill, 193215.Google Scholar
Hunter, R.L. (1980) “Philemon, Plautus and the Trinummus,” MH 37.4: 216–30.Google Scholar
Ijsendijk, A. (1884) De T. Macci Plauti Persa. Utrecht: I. Van Druten.Google Scholar
James, S. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. (2005) “At Play with Writing: Letters and Readers in Plautus,” TAPhA 135.2: 359–92.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. (2006) Intercepted Letters: Epistolarity and Narrative in Greek and Roman Literature. Lanham, md: Lexington.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1977) “The Frame of Reference: Poe, Lacan, Derrida,” Yale French Studies 55–56: 457–505.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. (2010) Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jory, E.J. (1966) “Dominus Gregis?CPh 61.2: 102–5.Google Scholar
Jory, E.J. (1988) “Publilius Syrus and the Element of Competition in the Theatre of the Republic,” in Horsfall, N. (ed), Vir Bonus Discendi Peritus: Studies in Celebration of Otto Skutsch’s Eightieth Birthday. BICS Suppl. 51. University of London, 7381.Google Scholar
Kaimio, M. (2000) “Tragic Titles in Comic Disguises,” in Styka, J. (ed), Studies in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism. Classica Cracoviensia V. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, 5369.Google Scholar
Katsouris, A.G. (1977) “Plautus’ Epidicus = Menander’s Homopatrioi?Latomus 36.2: 316–24.Google Scholar
Ketterer, R.C. (1986a) “Stage Properties in Plautine Comedy I,” Semiotica 58.3–4: 193216.Google Scholar
Ketterer, R.C. (1986b) “Stage Properties in Plautine Comedy II,” Semiotica 59.1–2: 93135.Google Scholar
Knox, B.M.W. (1968) “Silent Reading in Antiquity,” GRBS 9.4: 421–35.Google Scholar
Knox, B.M.W. (1972) “Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulide 1–163 (in that order),” YCS 22: 239– 61.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. (ed) (2018) Literacy in Ancient Everyday Life. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krebs, C.B. (2015) “The Buried Tradition of Programmatic Titulature among Republican Historians: Polybius’ Πραγματεία, Asellio’s Res Gestae, and Sisenna’s redefinition of ‘Historiae’,” AJPh 136.3: 503–24.Google Scholar
Kyle, D.G. (2007/2015) Sport and Spectacle in the Ancient World. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. (1966) Écrits. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Laplace, M.M.J. (1997) “P. Köln V 203: Un modèle de l’Acte I du Curculio de Plaute. Amour aveugle, amour stupéfié: un esclave et son maître devant les deux aspects de la personnalité d’une jeune fille,” APF: 570–7.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1991) “Curculio oder Der Triumph der Edazität,” in Lefèvre, , Stärk, and Vogt-Spira, (1991), 71–105.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1995) Plautus und Philemon. Tübingen: Gunter Narr .Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1997) Plautus’ Pseudolus. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2001) “Plautus’ Persa zwischen Νέα und Stegreifspiel,” in Faller, (2001a), 11–94.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2011) Plautus’ Bacchides. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E., Stärk, E. and Vogt-Spira, G. (eds) (1991) Plautus barbarus: Sechs Kapitel zur Originalität des Plautus. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Le Guen, B. (2014) “The Diffusion of Comedy from the Age of Alexander to the Beginning of the Roman Empire,” in Fontaine, and Scafuro, (2014), 360–76.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2004) Comedy and the Rise of Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, J.C.B. (2001) “Greek and Roman Elements in Epidicus’ Intrigue,” in Auhagen, (2001a), 57–70.Google Scholar
Lowrance, B. (2014) “Marlowe’s Wit: Power, Language, and the Literary in Tamburlaine and Doctor Faustus,” Modern Philology 111.4: 711–32.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2001) “Informationsvergabe und Spannungsverteilung in Plautus’ Epidicus,” in Auhagen, (2001a), 133–61.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (1996) “Plautus’ Pseudolus: The Long and the Short of It,” T&P 17: 34–8.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (1997) “Shattered Mirrors and Breaking Class: Saturio’s Daughter in Plautus’ Persa,” T&P 18: 100–9.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (2006) The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. (2015) “Domestic Sexual Labor in Plautus,” Helios 42.1: 123–41.Google Scholar
Maurice, L. (2003) “Amici et Sodales: An Examination of a Double Motif in Plautus,” Mnemosyne 56.2: 164–93.Google Scholar
Maurice, L. (2006) “Epidicus mihi fuit magister: Structure and Metatheatricality in Plautus’ Epidicus,” Scholia 15: 3552.Google Scholar
Mazzoli, G. (2006) “La monodia di Carmide nel Trinummus plautino (vv. 820–842a),” in Petrone, G. and Bianco, M.M. (eds), La commedia di Plauto e la parodia: Il lato comico dei paradigmi tragici. Palermo: Flaccovio, 924.Google Scholar
McCarthy, K. (2000) Slaves, Masters and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, R. (2015) “Silent Reading in Antiquity and the Future History of the Book,” Book History 18: 132.Google Scholar
McElduff, S. (2013) Roman Theories of Translation: Surpassing the Source. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Monaco, G. (1965) “L’epistola nel teatro antico,” Dioniso 39: 334–51.Google Scholar
Moore, T.J. (1991) “Palliata Togata: Plautus, Curculio 462–86,” AJPh 112.3: 343–62.Google Scholar
Moore, T.J. (1998) The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Moore, T.J. (2001) “Music in Epidicus,” in Auhagen, (2001a), 313–34.Google Scholar
Moore, T.J. (2005) “Pessuli, heus pessuli: La porta nel Curculio,” in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2005), 11–36.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. (1985) “Names and Players: The Sycophant Scene of the Trinummus (Trin. 4.2),” TAPhA 115: 167–86.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. (2016) Objects as Actors: Props and the Poetics of Performance in Greek Tragedy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, M. and Telò, M. (eds) (2018) The Materialities of Greek Tragedy: Objects and Affect in Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Müller, G.L. (1957) Das Original des plautinischen Persa. Ph.D. dissertation. Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Nervegna, S. (2013) Menander in Antiquity: The Contexts of Reception. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2020) Scale, Space and Canon in Ancient Literary Culture. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Bryhim, S. (2007) “Adonis in Plautus’ Pseudolus,” CPh 102.3: 304–7.Google Scholar
O’Bryhim, S. (2010) “Phoenicium in the Wax (Pl. Ps. 20–37),” Mnemosyne 63.4: 635–9.Google Scholar
Osann, F. (1816) Analecta critica poesis Romanorum scaenicae reliquias illustrantia. Berlin: Sumptibus F. Duemmleri.Google Scholar
Otto, A. (1890/1964) Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Hildesheim: G. Olms.Google Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D. (2020) Divine Institutions: Religions and Community in the Middle Roman Republic. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (2008/2009) “What’s in a Name? The Real Identity of Palinurus in Plautus’ Curculio,” CJ 104.2: 111–22.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (2016) “Plautus Undoing Himself –What is Funny and What is Plautine in Stichus and Trinummus?” in Frangoulidis, , Harrison, and Manuwald, (2016), 167–201.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (2020) “Plautus and the Topography of His World,” in Dutsch, and Franko, (2020), 287–300.Google Scholar
Pasetti, L. (2011) “Intellettuali nel Persa? Il parassita, sua figlia e la ‘filosofia da commedia,’” in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2011), 69–92.Google Scholar
Perysinakis, I.N. and Karakasis, E. (eds) (2014) Plautine Trends: Studies in Plautine Comedy and Its Reception. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Petrides, A.K. (2014) “Plautus between Greek Comedy and Atellan Farce: Assessments and Reassessments,” in Fontaine, and Scafuro, (2014), 424–44.Google Scholar
Petrone, G. (1983) Teatro antico e inganno: Finzioni plautine. Palermo: Palumbo.Google Scholar
Petrone, G. (ed) (1993) Le tre dracme. Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Petrone, G. (2001) “Il rischio della punizione: Scherzi e drammaturgia nell’Epidicus,” in Auhagen, (2001a), 179–90.Google Scholar
Philippides, K. (2016) “Symmetrical Recognitions in Plautus’ Epidicus,” in Frangoulidis, , Harrison, and Manuwald, (2016), 289–98.Google Scholar
Polt, C.B. (2015) “A Splitting Headache: Mask and Performance at Plautus Epidicus 81–101,” Mnemosyne 68.6: 1008–17.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1973) Die neuen Menanderpapyri und die Originalität des Plautus. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. (1995) “The Seal of Theognis, Writing and Oral Poetry,” AJPh 116.2: 171–84.Google Scholar
Prins, Y. (1996) “Sappho’s Afterlife in Translation,” in Greene, E. (ed), Re-Reading Sappho: Reception and Transmission. Berkeley: University of California Press, 3667.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (ed) (1965/1975) Bacchides. Firenze: Sansoni.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds) (2005) Lecturae plautinae sarsinates VIII: Curculio. Urbino: QuattroVenti.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds) (2011) Lecturae plautinae sarsinates XIV: Persa. Urbino: QuattroVenti.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2005) Rome and the Mysterious Orient: Three Plays by Plautus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (ed) (2006) Marcus Aurelius in Love. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2017) Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. and Weisweiler, J. (2004) “Gute Freunde, schlechte Freunde: Nochmals zu Plaut. ‘Bacch.’ 540–51,” Hermes 132.2: 141–51.Google Scholar
Riemer, P. (1996) Das Spiel im Spiel: Studien zum plautinischen Agon im ‘Trinummus’ und ‘Rudens’. Stuttgart and Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Rinon, Y. (2006) “‘Mise en abyme’ and Tragic Signification in the ‘Odyssey’: The Three Songs of Demodocus,” Mnemosyne 59.2: 208–25.Google Scholar
Ritschl, F. (1845) Parerga zu Plautus und Terenz I. Leipzig: Weidmannsche.Google Scholar
Rizzo, S. (1990) “Da Crisalo a Siro: Per una ricostruzione del Dis exapaton di Menandro (con alcune riflessioni sui pedagoghi in commedia),” in Dicti studiosus, Scritti di filologia offerti a Scevola Mariotti dai suoi allievi. Urbino: QuattroVenti, 948.Google Scholar
Robertson, K. (1996) “A Revenging Feminine Hand in Twelfth Night,” in Bergeron, D.M. (ed), Reading and Writing in Shakespeare. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 116–30.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. (2001) Ancient Epistolary Fictions: The Letter in Greek Literature. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. (2013) “The Appearance of Letters on Stages and Vases,” in Hodkinson, , Rosenmeyer, and Bracke, (2013), 39–69.Google Scholar
Sarri, A. (2017) Material Aspects of Letter Writing in the Graeco-Roman World. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scafoglio, G. (2007) “Elementi tragici nell’episodio virgiliano di Sinone,” Antike und Abendland 53: 7699.Google Scholar
Scafuro, A. (2003/2004) “The Rigmarole of the Parasite’s Contract for a Prostitute in Asinaria: Legal Documents in Plautus and His Predecessors,” Leeds International Classical Studies 3.4: 121.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1992) “Inscription, Absence and Memory: Epic and Early Epitaph,” SIFC 3.10: 5776.Google Scholar
Scragg, L. (1991) “‘Her C’s, Her U’s, and Her T’s: Why That?’ A New Reply for Sir Andrew Aguecheek,” Review of English Studies 42: 116.Google Scholar
Scullard, H.H. (1974) The Elephant in the Greek and Roman World. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Segal, E. (1968/1987) Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Segal, E. (1974) “The Purpose of the Trinummus: For J. Arthur Hanson,” AJPh 95.3: 252–64.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A.R. (1996) “The Art of Deceit: Pseudolus and the Nature of Reading,” CQ 46.1: 152–74.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A.R. (2008) “The Theatrical Life of Things: Plautus and the Physical,” Dictynna 5: https://doi.org/10.4000/dictynna.419Google Scholar
Sharrock, A.R. (2009) Reading Roman Comedy: Poetics and Playfulness in Plautus and Terence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A.R. (2014) “Reading Plautus’ Trinummus: Who’d Bother?” in Perysinakis, I.N. and Karakasis, E. (eds), Plautine Trends: Studies in Plautine Comedy and Its Reception. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 167–95.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A.R. (2016) “Genre and Social Class, or Comedy and the Rhetoric of Self-Aggrandisement and Self-Deprecation,” in Frangoulidis, Harrison and Manuwald (2016), 99–126.Google Scholar
Singh, J. (2018) Unthinking Mastery: Dehumanism and Decolonial Entaglements. Durham, nc: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Skafte Jensen, M. (1997) “The fall of Troy in Plautus’ Bacchides,” C&M 48: 315–23.Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. (1985/2000) Plautus in Performance: The Theatre of the Mind. Amsterdam: Harwood.Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. (1987) “The Dates of Plautus’ Curculio and the Trinummus Reconsidered,” AJPh 108.2: 264–9.Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. (2001) “Appearance, Reality, and the Spectre of Incest in Epidicus,” in Auhagen, (2001a), 191–203.Google Scholar
Slater, N.W. (2004) “Staging Literacy in Plautus,” in Mackie, C. (ed), Oral Performance and Its Context. Leiden: Brill, 163–77.Google Scholar
Smith, P.J. (2012) Between Two Stools: Scatology and Its Representations in English Literature, Chaucer to Swift. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Solin, H. (1977) “Die Namen der orientalischen Sklaven in Rom,” in Pflaum, H.G. and Duval, N. (eds), L’onomastique latine. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 205–20.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A.H. (ed) (2013) Menander: Samia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stärk, E. (1991) “Persa oder Ex oriente fraus,” in Lefèvre, , Stärk, and Vogt-Spira, (1991), 141–62.Google Scholar
Stärk, E. (2001) “Zwei Vermutungen zum Original des Epidicus,” in Auhagen, (2001a), 91–104.Google Scholar
Stein, J.P. (1966) ‘Trinummus,’’ Museum Notes (American Numismatic Society) 12: 65–9.Google Scholar
Stein, J.P. (1970) “Morality in Plautus’ Trinummus,” CB 47.1: 713.Google Scholar
Steiner, D.T. (1993) ‘Pindar’s “Oggetti Parlanti,” HSPh 95: 159–80.Google Scholar
Steiner, D.T. (1994) The Tyrant’s Writ: Myths and Images of Writing in Ancient Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (2008) Shakespeare’s Letters. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. (2012) Plautus and Roman Slavery. Malden, ma: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. (1993) On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Durham, nc: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, M. (2001) “Quid si adeam ad fores atque occentem? (Pl. Curc. 145): Alusión y transformación en el motivo del paraclausithyron,” Argos 25: 95112.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1988/1993) Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece. Ithaca, ny: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, G., Jowett, J., Bourus, T. and Egan, G. (eds) (2016) The New Oxford Shakespeare: Modern Critical Edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thraede, K. (1970) Grundzüge griechisch-römischer Brieftopik (Zetemata 48). München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Tontini, A. (2001) “La lacuna iniziale delle Bacchides nella tradizione manoscritta,” in Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds), Lecturae plautinae sarsinates IV: Bacchides. Urbino: QuattroVenti, 97103.Google Scholar
Torrance, I. (2013) Metapoetry in Euripides. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traill, A.E. (2005) “Acroteleutium’s Sapphic Infatuation (Miles 1216–83),” CQ 55.2: 518–33.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. (ed) (2003) Greek and Latin Letters: An Anthology with Translation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, E.G. (1952) Athenian Books in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries B.C. London: H.K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Warren, R. and Wells, S. (eds) (1994) Twelfth Night, or What You Will. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1894) De tribus carminibus latinis commentatio. Göttingen: Dieterich.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1925) Menander, Das Schiedsgericht. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. (1991) The Masks of Menander: Sign and Meaning in Greek and Roman Performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wills, D. (1995/2021) Prosthesis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2015) “Ancient Illiteracy?,” BICS 58.2: 3142.Google Scholar
Woytek, E. (ed) (1982) Plautus, Persa. Vienna: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (1975) “The Transformations of Pseudolus,” TAPhA 105: 403–16.Google Scholar
Zanker, A.T. (2016) Greek and Latin Expressions of Meaning: The Classical Origins of a Modern Metaphor. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Emilia A. Barbiero, New York University
  • Book: Letters in Plautus
  • Online publication: 01 December 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009168502.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Emilia A. Barbiero, New York University
  • Book: Letters in Plautus
  • Online publication: 01 December 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009168502.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Emilia A. Barbiero, New York University
  • Book: Letters in Plautus
  • Online publication: 01 December 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009168502.009
Available formats
×