Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-10T02:34:49.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Civic Engagement

Entering the Political Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Luis R. Fraga
Affiliation:
University of Washington
John A. Garcia
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Rodney E. Hero
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Michael Jones-Correa
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Valerie Martinez-Ebers
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Gary M. Segura
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Over the past decade political scientists and sociologists have come to see the importance of people coming together for social or civic reasons. Whether through bridge clubs, food pantries, or political organizations, Americans benefit both individually and as a society when people leave their homes and become involved with others. This coming together, or civic engagement, also helps people develop civic skills that can carry over into other social arenas, including the electoral and political realms, such as voting, political party affiliation, interest groups, social movements, contacting, and others. Greater civic involvement has also been found to heighten interpersonal trust and sense of efficacy, and to give people the sense that they can have an impact on social issues affecting them as well as more generally to improve their attitudes toward the social and political realms, including government.

The term civic engagement has two key ideas associated with it: civic association and social capital. Social capital refers to “connections among individuals in social networks,” and such social contacts, or “connectedness,” affect the well-being and “productivity of individuals and groups” (Putnam 2000, 19). Although the phenomena of social capital and civic engagement are associated in that they seem to go together with trust, reciprocity, and the like, the direction of causation (i.e., which leads to which) is not clear (see, e.g., Hero 2007). Some of the ways social capital contributes to democratic processes include the following:

  1. “Associations and less formal networks of civic engagement instill in their members habits of cooperation and public-spiritedness, as well as the practical skills necessary to partake in public life” (Putnam 2000, 338; see also Verba, Schlozman, and Brady 1995).

  2. “Political information flows through social networks, and in these networks public life is discussed” (Knack 2002, 774).

  3. “Externally, voluntary associations…allow individuals to express their interests and demands on government and to protect themselves from abuses of power from political leaders.” That is, extensive and nurturing social connections through civic association facilitate norms of reciprocity and social trust that deeply enrich a group and the larger society, thus leading to a host of salutary effects (Putnam 2000, 19).

Type
Chapter
Information
Latinos in the New Millennium
An Almanac of Opinion, Behavior, and Policy Preferences
, pp. 188 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrera, Mario 1985 The Historical Evolution of Chicano Ethnic Goals: A Bibliographic EssaySage Race Relations Abstracts 10 1Google Scholar
Hero, Rodney E 2007 Racial Diversity and Social Capital: Equality and Community in AmericaNew YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen 2002 Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the StatesAmerican Journal of Political Science 46 772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquez, Benjamin. 1993 LULAC: The Evolution of a Mexican American OrganizationAustin, TXUniversity of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D 2000 Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American CommunityNew YorkSimon and SchusterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sindey, Kay LSchlozman, and Henry Brady 1995 Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American PoliticsCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×