Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-jpcp9 Total loading time: 0.572 Render date: 2022-12-01T21:23:23.377Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

22 - Perspectives on Land-Change Science and Carbon Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Daniel G. Brown
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Derek T. Robinson
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Nancy H. F. French
Michigan Technological University
Bradley C. Reed
United States Geological Survey, California
Get access



In response to the need to understand the drivers, processes, and consequences of human activities that change the land surface, the developing science of land change is addressing observations, explanations, and predictions of these land-surface changes (Gutman et al. 2004; Rindfuss et al. 2004; Turner, Lambin, and Reenberg 2007). In that context, this volume synthesizes recent advances from multiple disciplines that contribute to our understanding of how land changes affect the cycling of carbon (C) between the land surface and the atmosphere. Observations about changes in C stocks and fluxes on land and in the atmosphere, and about the contributions of the former to the latter (see Sections I and II of this volume), have played a role in motivating a wide range of economic, political, and social responses to the problem of increasing atmospheric C concentrations (see Sections IV and V). Many of the most important approaches to mitigating these increases have to do with the technological, behavioral, and regulatory innovations regarding C emissions from the use of fossil fuels. However, the secondary role of land-use and land-cover change (LUCC) and land management in causing increases in atmospheric C, as well as the potential to direct these activities toward enhanced sequestration (referred to as biological sequestration), justify attention to land-related policies and management that can respond to these challenges and opportunities. Analyses of these management and policy options are informed by both the observations that undergird our understanding of C stocks and fluxes and by results from mathematical, statistical, and computational models that encode our understanding of land-system processes and their impacts on land-based C.

What we hope to have advanced by bringing together the work presented in this volume is an integrated, interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral, and cross-scale perspective on the issues surrounding land-related C. This understanding comes from advances in the theoretical and empirical bases of land-change and C cycle sciences, as well as cross-fertilization among them. Integrating these sciences brings findings from several scientific disciplines into closer alignment with the needs of decision makers in various settings and informs those decisions in ways that consider the physical, biological, and social contexts of multiple land-related decisions. Included within these pages are numerous examples of (1) results from measurements and models of land–C interactions and (2) implications of these results for land management and policy for affecting C stocks and fluxes.

Land Use and the Carbon Cycle
Advances in Integrated Science, Management, and Policy
, pp. 539 - 548
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Chhatre, A., and Agrawal, A. 2009. Synergies and trade-offs between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106:17667–17670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churkina, G., Brown, D.G., and Keoleian, G. 2010. Carbon stored in human settlements: Conterminous US. Global Change Biology, 16:135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coomes, O.T., Takasaki, Y., and Rhemtulla, J. 2011. Land-use poverty traps identified in shifting cultivation systems shape long-term tropical forest cover. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(34):13925–13930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P.C. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652):1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutman, G., Janetos, A.C., Justice, C.O., Moran, E.F., Mustard, J.F., Rindfuss, R.R.,…Cochrane, M. 2004. Land change science: Observing, monitoring and understanding trajectories of change on the Earth's surface. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing Series 6. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtt, G., Frolking, S., Fearon, M., Moore, B., Shevliakova, E., Malyshev, S.,…Houghton, R. 2006. The underpinnings of land-use history: Three centuries of global gridded land-use transitions, wood-harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands. Global Change Biology, 12(7):1208–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein Goldewijk, K. 2001. Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE database. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15(2):417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.A. 1999. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 13(4):997–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rindfuss, R.R., Walsh, S.J., Turner, B.L. II, Fox, J., and Mishra, V. 2004. Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101:13976–13981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, B.L., Lambin, E.F., and Reenberg, A. 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52):20666–20671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, B.L., and Robbins, P. 2008. Land-change science and political ecology: Similarities, differences, and implications for sustainability science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1):295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verburg, P.H., Ellis, E.C., and Letourneau, A. 2011. A global assessment of market accessibility and market influence for global environmental change studies. Environmental Research Letters, 6:034019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, T., Horner, M.W., and Sulik, J. 2011. A geographic approach to sectoral carbon inventory: Examining the balance between consumption-based emissions and land-use carbon sequestration in Florida. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(4):752–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats