Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-4hcbs Total loading time: 0.799 Render date: 2021-12-03T23:06:01.239Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

James R. O'Shea
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant's Critique of Pure Reason
A Critical Guide
, pp. 280 - 292
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaci, Uygar 2014. “Kant's Only Possible Argument and Chignell's Real Harmony,” Kantian Review 19.1: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abaci, Uygar 2016. “The Coextensiveness Thesis and Kant's Modal Agnosticism in the ‘Postulates,’European Journal of Philosophy 24.1: 129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abela, Paul 2002. Kant's Empirical Realism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert Merrihew 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adickes, Erich 1924. Kant und das Ding an Sich. Berlin: R. Heise.Google Scholar
Allais, Lucy 2004. “Kant's One World,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12.4: 655–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy 2007. “Kant's Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45.3: 459–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant's Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H. 1983. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, H. 2004. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Rev. and enlarged ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2000. Kant's Theory of Mind. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2003. Interpreting Kant's Critiques. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2006. Kant and the Historical Turn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 2012. Kant's Elliptical Path. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1975. “The First Person,” in Guttenplan, Samuel (ed.), Mind and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 4565.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St. Thomas 1948. Summa Theologica. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.). Rev. ed. New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St. Thomas 1952. Truth, vol. 1. Mulligan, R. W. (trans.). Chicago: Henry Regnery.Google Scholar
Aristotle 1831a. Opera, ed. Bekker, I., vol. I. Berlin.Google Scholar
Aristotle 1831b. Analytica priora I, in 1831a: 1:2452.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre 1996. Logic, or, The Art of Thinking. Buroker, Jill Vance (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, Ralf M. 2012. “The Role of Kant's Refutation of Idealism,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94.1: 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, Ralf M. 2013. “Self-Knowledge in §7 of the Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Bacin, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIth International Kant Kongress, vol. 2. New York: de Gruyter, pp. 531–40.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. (2013 [1739/1757]). Metaphysica. 4th ed. English trans. Metaphysics, Fugate, C. D. and Hymers, J. (eds.). New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White 1975. Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White 1978. “Did the Sage of Königsberg Have No Dreams?” in Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 3861.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick 2006. “Moral Faith and the Highest Good,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 588629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan 1966. Kant's Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan 1974. Kant's Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham 1966. “The Beginning of the Universe,” Aristotelian Society XL(Suppl.): 139–50.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham 2006. The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham 2011. “Replies to My Critics,” Kantian Review 16.2: 274–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulter, Stephen 2011. “The Mediaeval Origin of Conceivability Arguments,” Metaphilosophy 42.5: 617–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard, and Stark, Werner (eds.) 1987. Neue Autographen und Dokumente zu Kants Leben, Schriften und Vorlesungen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Brewer, K., and Watkins, E. 2012. “A Difficulty Still Awaits: Kant, Spinoza, and the Threat of Theological Determinism,” Kant-Studien 103: S163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook, Andrew 1994. Kant and the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd 1969. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science the Classical Origins: Descartes to Kant, vol. 46.
Buroker, Jill Vance 2006. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Peter 2007. Kant on God. New York: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Caird, Edward 1889. The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. 2 vols. Glasgow: Maclehose.Google Scholar
Callanan, John J. 2008. “Kant on Analogy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16.4: 747–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, John J. 2013. “Kant on Nativism, Scepticism and Necessity,” Kantian Review 18.1: 127. doi:10.1017/S136941541200026X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1950. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue International de Philosophie 4: 2040; 2nd rev. ed. in: idem., (1956), 205–21.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1956. Meaning and Necessity. 2nd rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2007a. “Belief in Kant,” Philosophical Review 116.3: 72101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2007b. “Kant's Concepts of Justification,” Noûs 41.1: 3363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2009. “‘As Kant Has Shown…’: Analytic Theology and the Critical Philosophy,” in Analytic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 117–35.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2010a. “Causal Refutations of Idealism,” Philosophical Quarterly 60.240: 487507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2010b. “Real Repugnance and Belief about Things-in-Themselves: A Problem and Kant's Three Solutions,” in Kant's Moral Metaphysics, Krueger, James and Lipscomb, Benjamin Bruxvoort (eds.). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, pp. 177210.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2011. “Real Repugnance and Our Ignorance of Things-in-Themselves: A Lockean Problem in Kant and Hegel,” Internationales Jahrbuch Des Deutschen Idealismus 7: 135–59.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2014a. “Kant and the ‘Monstrous’ Ground of Possibility,” Kantian Review 19.1: 5369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2014b. “Modal Motivations for Noumenal Ignorance: Knowledge, Cognition, and Coherence,” Kant-Studien 105.4: 573–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew 2017. “Kant on Cognition, Givenness, and Ignorance,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55: 131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew, and Stang, Nicholas. 2015. “Postulate des Empirischen Denkens,” in Mohr, Georg, Stolzenberg, Juergen, and Willascheck, Marcus (eds.), Kant-Lexicon. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cleeremans, Axel (ed.) 2003. The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration and Dissociation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffa, Alberto 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, James 1991. “The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus,” Philosophical Topics 20.1: 115–80.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1969. Content and Consciousness. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1985 [CSM]. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 3, Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., and Kenny, A. (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DiCenso, James 2011. Kant, Religion, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1993. “Realism and Anti-realism,” in Dummett, (ed.), The Seas of Language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 462–78.Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey W. 2011. “Turning the Game against the Idealist: Mendelssohn's Refutation of Idealism in the Morgenstunden and Kant's Replies,” Studies in German Idealism 13: 159–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, John 1986. A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emundts, Dina 2010. “The Refutation of Idealism and the Distinction between Phenomena and Noumena,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason.’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–89.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen 2006. “Understanding and Sensibility,” Inquiry 49: 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen 2013. “Unity of Apperception,” Studi Kantiani 26: 3754.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Benno 1881. Nachträge zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft in 1881. Kiel: Lipsius & Tischer.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth 1975. “Identity and Predication,” in Evans, (ed.), Collected Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2548.Google Scholar
Evans, GarethEvans, 1982. The Varieties of Reference, McDowell, J. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, Lorne 1998. “A Double Edged Sword? Kant's Refutation of Mendel-ssohn's Proof of the Immortality of the Soul and Its Implications for His Theory of Matter,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29.4: 561–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, Lorne 2006. “Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Bird, Graham (ed.), A Companion to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 140–53.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart 2012. Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael 2013. Kant's Construction of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian 1999. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian 2011. “Kant's Practical Postulates and the Limits of the Critical System,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 63: 187215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gava, Gabriele 2014. “Kant's Definition of Science in the Architectonic of Pure Reason and the Essential Ends of Reason,” Kant-Studien 105.3: 372–93.Google Scholar
Gava, Gabriele 2016. “The Fallibilism of Kant's Architectonic,” in Gava, G. and Stern, R. (eds.), Pragmatism, Kant and Transcendental Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 46–66.
Gava, Gabriele Forthcoming. “Sind die regulativen Ideen ein doktrinaler Glaube? Über die Rechtfertigung des regulativen Gebrauchs der Ideen im Anhang zur transzendentalen Dialektik” [Are the regulative ideas a doctrinal belief? On the justification of the regulative use of the ideas in the appendix to the transcendental dialectic], in Waibel, V. L. and Ruffing, M. (eds.), Akten des 12. internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Berlin: De Gruyter.
Geiger, Ido 2003. “Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?” Kant-Studien 94.3: 273–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfert, Axel 2006. “Kant on Testimony,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14.4: 627–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettier, Edmund 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23: 121–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Jerry H. 1984. “Kant, Analogy, and Natural Theology,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16.1: 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah 2006. “Empirical Concepts and the Content of Experience,” European Journal of Philosophy 14.3: 349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah 2013. “Kant's Perceiver,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87.1: 221–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloy, Karen (ed.) 1990. “Die Differenz von Verstand und Sinnlichkeit,” in Studien zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants. Würzburg, pp. 141.Google Scholar
Gochnauer, Myron 1974. “Kant's Refutation of Idealism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 195206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godlove, Terry 2014. Kant and the Meaning of Religion. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Robert 2001. Kant's Theory of A Priori Knowledge. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle 2001. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Michelle 2010. “The Ideal of Pure Reason,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 266–89.Google Scholar
Griffith, Aaron 2010. “Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason,” European Journal of Philosophy 20.2: 193222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüne, Stefanie 2017. “Givenness, Objective Reality, and A Priori Intuitions,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55.1: 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 1983. “Kant's Intentions in the Refutation of Idealism,” The Philosophical Review 92.3: 329–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul 1989. “Psychology and the Transcendental Deduction,” in Förster, E. (ed.), Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 4768.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2006. Kant. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul 2007. “Debating Allison on Transcendental Idealism,” Kantian Review 12.2: 1024.Google Scholar
Haag, Johannes 2007. Erfahrung und Gegenstand. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, Robert 2006. Kant, Science and Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, William 2007. “Comments on Westphal,” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 46.4: 729–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, William 2011. Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Gary 2006. “Kant on the Perception of Space (and Time),” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidemann, Dietmar 2002. “Anschauung und Begriff. Ein Begründungsversuch des Stämme-Dualisms in Kants Erkenntnistheorie,” in Engelhard, K. (ed.), Aufklärungen. Festschrift für Klaus Düsing zum 60. Geburtstag. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 6590.Google Scholar
Heine, Heinrich 1986. Religion and Philosophy in Germany: A Fragment. Snodgrass, John (trans.). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter 1969. “The Proof-Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction,” Review of Metaphysics 22.4: 640–59.Google Scholar
Hillman, T. Allan 2010. “Leibniz on the Imago Dei,” in Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven M. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. V. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171213.Google Scholar
Hinske, Norbert 1998. Zwischen Aufklarung und Vernunftkritik. Stuttgart: frommann-holzboog.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1739/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Nidditch, P. H. (ed.) (revision of Selby-Bigge, L. A.). 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. Norton, D. F. and Norton, M. J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (designated ‘T,’ refd by Book.Part.§.¶ numbers).Google Scholar
Hume, David 2007. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings. Coleman, Dorothy (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Janiak, A., and Schliesser, E. 2012. Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kannisto, Toni 2013. “Modality and Metaphysics in Kant,” in Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margit (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten Des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 633–46.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1900–. Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Reimer/de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1987. “Vom inneren Sinne (Loses Blatt Leningrad 1; Leningrad Fragment I, NF 364–6),” in Brandt, R. and Stark, W. (eds.), Neue Autographen und Dokumente zu Kants Leben, Schriften und Vorlesungen. Berlin: Felix Meiner, pp. 1821.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman 1923/1962. A Commentary to Kant's “Critique of Pure Reason.” New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman 1929. Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kepler, Johannes 1997 [1619]. The Harmony of the World. Aiton, E. J., Duncan, A. M. and Field, J. V. (eds., trans.). Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 209. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Patricia 2011. Kant's Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneale, William, and Kneale, Martha 1975. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Johann Heinrich 1764. Neues Organon. 2 vols. Leipzig: Wendler.Google Scholar
Land, Thomas 2006. “Kant's Spontaneity Thesis,” Philosophical Topics: Analytic Kantianism 34: 189220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rae 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Laplace, Pierre Simon de 1847 [1820]. Theorie analylique des probabilites. Paris: V. Courcier. In Oevres de LaPlace, vol. 7. Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1847.Google Scholar
Laywine, Alison 1993. Kant's Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy. North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy. Atrascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Leech, Jessica 2014. “Making Modal Distinctions: Kant on the Possible, the Actual, and the Intuitive Understanding,” Kantian Review 19.3: 339–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1989. Philosophical Essays. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel (eds.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1997. New Essays on Human Understanding. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1929 [1956]. Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1970. Collected Papers of Clarence Irving Lewis. Goheen, J. D. and Mothershead, J. L. Jr. (eds.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lighthill, Sir James 1986. “The Recently Recognized Failure of Predictability in Newtonian Dynamics,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 407: 3355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, P. H. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Logan, Beryl 1998. “Hume and Kant on Knowing the Deity,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43.3: 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice 1998/2001. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice 2008. “Kant's ‘I Think’ versus Descartes’ ‘I Am a Thing That Thinks,’” in Kant and the Early Moderns, Garber, Daniel and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 931.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice 2012. “Two Uses of ‘I’ as Subject?” in Immunity to Error through Misidentification, Prosser, Simon and Recanati, François (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2003. “The Cognition–Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34.1: 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas 1997. Dialogues on Metaphysics and on Religion. Jolley, Nicholas and Scott, David (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimi, Michela 2014. “Prescribing Laws to Nature,” Kant-Studien 105.4: 491508.Google Scholar
Massimi, Michela 2017. “The Legacy of Newton for the Pre-Critical Kant,” in The Oxford Handbook on Newton, Schliesser, E. and Smeenk, C. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1998. “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality,” Journal of Philosophy 95.9: 431–92.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 2009a. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 2009b. “Hegel's Idealism as Radicalization of Kant,” in Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 6989.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 2009c. “Avoiding the Myth of the Given,” in Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 256–72.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 2015. “Putnam on Natural Realism,” in Auxier, R. E., Anderson, D. R., and Hahn, L. E. (eds.), The Philosophy of Hilary Putnam. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 643–58.Google Scholar
Meier, George Friedrich 1752. Auszug aus der Vernuftlehre. Halle, Germany: Gebauer.Google Scholar
Melnick, Arthur 1989. Space, Time, and Thought in Kant. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses 1997. Moses Mendelssohn: Philosophical Writings. Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses 2011. Morning Hours, or Lectures on God's Existence. Dahlstrom, Daniel and Dyck, Corey W. (trans.). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milmed, Bella K. 1969. “‘Possible Experience’ and Recent Interpretations of Kant,” in Beck, L. W. (ed.), Kant Studies Today. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 301–21.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de 2003 [1580]. “An Apology for Raymond Sebond,” in Essays, Screech, M. A. (trans.). London: Penguin Books, pp. 489683.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. 2010. “The Transcendental Doctrine of Method,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 310–26.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. 2011. “Bird on Kant's Mathematical Antinomies,” Kantian Review 16.2: 235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ernest 1961. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Cohen, Bernard, Whitman, Anne, and Budenz, Julia (trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac 2004. “De Gravitatione,” in Janiak, A. (ed.), Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1239.Google Scholar
Onof, Christian, and Schulting, Dennis 2015. “Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition: On the Note to B160 in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason,” The Philosophical Review 124.1: 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, James R. 1997. “The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5.2: 216–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, James R. 2014. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction and Interpretation. London: Routledge. First published by Acumen, 2012.Google Scholar
Parsons, Charles 1992. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence 2010. “Kant's Doctrinal Belief in God,” in Thorndike, Oliver (ed.), Rethinking Kant, vol. 3. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 200–18.Google Scholar
Pasternack, LawrenceThorndike, Oliver 2011. “Kant and Theology at the Boundaries of Reason,” Kantian Review 16.3: 495–98.Google Scholar
Pasternack, LawrenceThorndike, Oliver 2014a. “Kant on Opinion: Assent, Hypothesis, and the Norms of General Applied Logic,” Kant-Studien 105.1: 4182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, LawrenceThorndike, Oliver 2014b. Kant's Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: An Interpretation and Defense. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. 1936. Kant's Metaphysic of Experience. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Piché, David 1999. La Condamnation parisienne de 1277. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Pickering, Mark 2016. “Kant's Theoretical Reasons for Belief in Things in Themselves,” Kant-Studien 107.4: 589616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2005. The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin 1966. “Kant's Objection to the Ontological Argument,” Journal of Philosophy 63.19: 537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold 1969. “Zum Warheitsproblem bei Kant,” Kant-Studien 60: 166–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold 1971. Erscheinung bei Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold 1974. Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.Google Scholar
Proops, Ian 2014. “Kant on the Cosmological Argument,” Philosophers’ Imprint 14.12: 121.Google Scholar
Proops, Ian 2015. “Kant on the Ontological Argument,” Noûs 49.1: 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus 2001. Gesammelte Schriften. With Introduction and annotations. Baum, M., Rameil, U., Reisinger, K., and Scholz, G. (eds.). Hamburg, Germany: Meiner.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Savage, Denis (trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Jay F. 2005. Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkoetter, Timothy 2010. “Absolute Positing, the Frege Anticipation Thesis, and Kant's Definitions of Judgment,” European Journal of Philosophy 18: 539–66.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Karl Forthcoming. “Kant's Conception of Cognition and Our Knowledge of Things-in-Themselves,” in Stang, Nick (ed.), The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds: New Essays on Kant's Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schliesser, Eric 2013. “On Reading Newton as an Epicurean: Kant, Spinozism and the Changes to the Principia,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 416–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senderowicz, Yaron M. 2005. The Coherence of Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Setiya, Kieran 2004. “Transcendental Idealism in the Aesthetic,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68.1: 6388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabel, Lisa 2003. Mathematics in Kant's Critical Philosophy: Reflections on Mathematical Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shabel, Lisa 2010. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Jerome 1962. “Existence, Predication, and the Ontological Argument,” Mind 71.283: 307–25.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney 1968. “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness,” Journal of Philosophy 65: 555–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney 1970. “Persons and Their Pasts,” American Philosophical Quarterly 7.4: 269–85.Google Scholar
Smith, Donald P. 2003. “Kant on the Dependency of the Cosmological Argument on the Ontological Argument,” European Journal of Philosophy 11.2: 206–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Nicholas 2016. Kant's Modal Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie 2003. “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge,” Kantian Review 7.1: 72101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1974. “Imagination and Perception,” in Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. London: Methuen, pp. 4565.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1979. “Perception and Its Objects,” in MacDonald, G. F. (ed.), Perception and Identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 4160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1989. “Sensibility, Understanding, and the Doctrine of Synthesis: Comments on Henrich and Guyer,” in Förster, E. (ed.), Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 6977.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1997a. “Kant's New Foundations of Metaphysics,” in Entity and Identity and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–44.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1997b. “The Problem of Realism and the A Priori,” in Entity and Identity and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 246–51.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry 1994. “Kantian Argument, Conceptual Capacities, and Invulnerability,” in Parrini, P. (ed.), Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 231–51.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel 2005. “The Point of the Axioms of Intuition,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86.1: 135–59.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard 1996. “The Beginning of the Universe,” Aristotelian Society XL(Suppl.): 139–50.Google Scholar
Tempier, Étienne 1277. Opiniones ducentae undeviginti Sigeri de Brabantia, Boetii de Dacia aliorumque, a Stephano episcopo Parisiensi de consilio doctorum Sacrae Scripturae condemnatae 1277. Paris. http://hiphi.ubbcluj.ro/fam/texte/tempier_opiniones_219.htm.Google Scholar
Tempier, Étienne 1999. Critical edition of Tempier (1277), in Piché, David, La Condamnation parisienne de 1277. Paris: Vrin, pp. 1762.Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton 2013. “The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions: A New Approach,” Kantian Review 18: 107–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Anne 2003. “Consciousness and Perceptual Binding,” in Cleeremans, Axel (ed.), The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration and Dissociation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 95113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleve, James 1999. Problems from Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, Jonathan 1993. “The Problem of Self-Knowledge in Kant's ‘Refutation of Idealism’: Two Recent Views,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53.4: 875–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Ralph C. S. 1978. Kant. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Walker, Ralph C. S. 1995. “Verificationism, Anti-Realism, and Idealism,” European Journal of Philosophy, 3.3: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel 1998. “Kant and the A Priority of Space,” Philosophical Review 107: 179224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric 2000. “Kant on Rational Cosmology,” in Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 7089.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric 2006. “On the Necessity and Nature of Simples: Leibniz, Wolff, Baumgarten, and the Pre-Critical Kant,” in Garber, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261314.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (ed., trans.) 2009. Kant's “Critique of Pure Reason”: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric 2013. “Kant on the Natural, Moral, Human, and Divine Orders,” in The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric Forthcoming. “Breaking with Rationalism: Kant, Crusius, and the Priority of Existence,” in Look, B. (ed.), Leibniz and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watkins, Eric, and Willaschek, Marcus 2017. “Kant's Account of Cognition,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55: 83112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, John 1881. Kant and His English Critics: A Comparison of Critical and Empirical Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weizsäcker, C. F., von 1971. “Kant's ‘First Analogy of Experience’ and Conservation Principles of Physics,” Synthese 23: 7595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004. Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2005. “Kant, Wittgenstein and Transcendental Chaos,” Philosophical Investigations 28.4: 303–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007a. “Kant's Anti-Cartesianism,” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 46.4: 709–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007b. “Proving Realism Transcendentally: Replies to Rolf George and William Harper,” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 46.4: 737–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007c. “Consciousness and Its Transcendental Conditions: Kant's Anti-Cartesian Revolt,” in Heinämaa, S., Lähteenmäki, V., and Remes, P. (eds.), Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 223–43.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2008. “Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell,” in Lindgaard, J. (ed.), John McDowell: Experience, Norm and Nature. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 124–51.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2010. “Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–30.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2013a. “Hume, Empiricism and the Generality of Thought,” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 52.2: 233–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2013b. “Kant's Cognitive Semantics, Newton's Rule Four of Natural Philosophy and Scientific Realism Today,” in Kant and Contemporary Theory of Knowledge, Kant Yearbook 5:127–68.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2016. “Mind, Language and Behaviour: Kant's Critical Cautions contra Contemporary Internal and Causal Naturalism,” in Babür, S. (ed.), Felsefede Yöntem/Method in Philosophy, special issue of Yeditepe'de Felsefe/Philosophy at Yeditepe, vol. 10. Istanbul: Yedite Üniversi Press, pp. 102–49.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2017. “Kant's Analytic of Principles,” in Timmons, M. and Baiasu, S. (eds.), Kant. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1958. The Blue and the Brown Books. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian 1740. Philosophia rationalis sive logica, Pars I–III. Frankfurt und Leipzig. Reprinted in Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim: Olms, 1983), 2. Abt., vols. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 1995. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Mit einem Essay über Freges “Begriffsschrift.” Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2000. “Kantische Urteilstafel und vollständige Induktion: Nachtrag zu meiner Kontroverse mit Ulrich Nortmann.” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 54.1: 8694.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2009a. Abhandlung über die Prinzipien der Logik. Mit einer Rekonstruktion der aristotelischen Syllogistik. 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2009b. “Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40: 341–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2010a. “Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant. Eine Stellungnahme zu Theodor Eberts Gegeneinwänden,” Part 1. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 41: 199213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2010b. “Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant. Eine Stellungnahme zu Theodor Eberts Gegeneinwänden,” Part 2. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 41: 359–71.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael 2013. “Viele Logiken – Eine Vernunft. Warum der logische Pluralismus ein Irrtum ist,” Methodus: International Journal for Modern Philosophy 7: 73128.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael Forthcoming. “Kant's Table of Judgments: Frege's Critique and Kant's Rejoinder,” Westphal, K. R. (trans.), Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas 1991. “Conundrums in Kant's Rational Religion,” in Rossi, P. J. and Wreen, M. J. (eds.), Kant's Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 4053.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas 1998. “Is It Possible and Desirable for Theologians to Recover from Kant?” Modern Theology 14.1: 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1970. Kant's Moral Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1978. Kant's Rational Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1992. “Rational Theology, Moral Faith, and Religion,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 394416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2005. Kant. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2010. “The Antinomies of Pure Reason,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 245–65.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin 1996. Realism, Meaning and Truth. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell/Polity.Google Scholar
Yong, Peter 2014. “God, Totality and Possibility in Kant's Only Possible Argument,” Kantian Review 19.1: 2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by James R. O'Shea, University College Dublin
  • Book: Kant's <I>Critique of Pure Reason</I>
  • Online publication: 29 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139871389.016
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by James R. O'Shea, University College Dublin
  • Book: Kant's <I>Critique of Pure Reason</I>
  • Online publication: 29 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139871389.016
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by James R. O'Shea, University College Dublin
  • Book: Kant's <I>Critique of Pure Reason</I>
  • Online publication: 29 June 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139871389.016
Available formats
×