Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Kant's <I>Critique of Pure Reason</I>
  • Cited by 3
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Kant's monumental book the Critique of Pure Reason was arguably the most conceptually revolutionary work in the history of philosophy and its impact continues to be felt throughout philosophical debates today. However, it is a notoriously difficult work whose basic meaning and lasting philosophical significance are both subject to ongoing controversy. In this Critical Guide, an international team of leading Kant scholars addresses the challenges, clarifying Kant's basic terms and arguments, and engaging with the debates that surround this central text. Providing compact explanations along with cutting-edge interpretations of nearly all of the main themes and arguments in Kant's Critique, this volume provides well-balanced arguments on such controversial topics as the interpretation of Kant's transcendental idealism, conceptualism and non-conceptual content in perception, and the soundness of his transcendental arguments. This volume will engage readers of Kant at all levels.

Reviews

'The individual essays of this volume are of high quality and fit together well, even when - or perhaps especially when - they defend contradictory positions on a given issue … This will be a book that Kant scholars will want to read.'

James Messina Source: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Abaci, Uygar 2014. “Kant's Only Possible Argument and Chignell's Real Harmony,” Kantian Review 19.1: 125.
Abaci, Uygar 2016. “The Coextensiveness Thesis and Kant's Modal Agnosticism in the ‘Postulates,’European Journal of Philosophy 24.1: 129–58.
Abela, Paul 2002. Kant's Empirical Realism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Adams, Robert Merrihew 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adickes, Erich 1924. Kant und das Ding an Sich. Berlin: R. Heise.
Allais, Lucy 2004. “Kant's One World,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12.4: 655–84.
Allais, Lucy 2007. “Kant's Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45.3: 459–84.
Allais, Lucy 2015. Manifest Reality: Kant's Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allison, H. 1983. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Allison, H. 2004. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Rev. and enlarged ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Ameriks, Karl 2000. Kant's Theory of Mind. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ameriks, Karl 2003. Interpreting Kant's Critiques. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ameriks, Karl 2006. Kant and the Historical Turn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ameriks, Karl 2012. Kant's Elliptical Path. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1975. “The First Person,” in Guttenplan, Samuel (ed.), Mind and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 4565.
Aquinas, St. Thomas 1948. Summa Theologica. Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.). Rev. ed. New York: Benziger Brothers.
Aquinas, St. Thomas 1952. Truth, vol. 1. Mulligan, R. W. (trans.). Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Aristotle 1831a. Opera, ed. Bekker, I., vol. I. Berlin.
Aristotle 1831b. Analytica priora I, in 1831a: 1:2452.
Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre 1996. Logic, or, The Art of Thinking. Buroker, Jill Vance (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bader, Ralf M. 2012. “The Role of Kant's Refutation of Idealism,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94.1: 5373.
Bader, Ralf M. 2013. “Self-Knowledge in §7 of the Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Bacin, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIth International Kant Kongress, vol. 2. New York: de Gruyter, pp. 531–40.
Baumgarten, A. (2013 [1739/1757]). Metaphysica. 4th ed. English trans. Metaphysics, Fugate, C. D. and Hymers, J. (eds.). New York: Bloomsbury.
Beck, Lewis White 1975. Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Beck, Lewis White 1978. “Did the Sage of Königsberg Have No Dreams?” in Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 3861.
Beiser, Frederick 2006. “Moral Faith and the Highest Good,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 588629.
Bennett, Jonathan 1966. Kant's Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, Jonathan 1974. Kant's Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bird, Graham 1966. “The Beginning of the Universe,” Aristotelian Society XL(Suppl.): 139–50.
Bird, Graham 2006. The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason. Chicago: Open Court.
Bird, Graham 2011. “Replies to My Critics,” Kantian Review 16.2: 274–82.
Boulter, Stephen 2011. “The Mediaeval Origin of Conceivability Arguments,” Metaphilosophy 42.5: 617–41.
Brandt, Reinhard, and Stark, Werner (eds.) 1987. Neue Autographen und Dokumente zu Kants Leben, Schriften und Vorlesungen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Brewer, K., and Watkins, E. 2012. “A Difficulty Still Awaits: Kant, Spinoza, and the Threat of Theological Determinism,” Kant-Studien 103: S163–87.
Brook, Andrew 1994. Kant and the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buchdahl, Gerd 1969. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science the Classical Origins: Descartes to Kant, vol. 46.
Buroker, Jill Vance 2006. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byrne, Peter 2007. Kant on God. New York: Ashgate.
Caird, Edward 1889. The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. 2 vols. Glasgow: Maclehose.
Callanan, John J. 2008. “Kant on Analogy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16.4: 747–72.
Callanan, John J. 2013. “Kant on Nativism, Scepticism and Necessity,” Kantian Review 18.1: 127. doi:10.1017/S136941541200026X.
Carnap, Rudolf 1950. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue International de Philosophie 4: 2040; 2nd rev. ed. in: idem., (1956), 205–21.
Carnap, Rudolf 1956. Meaning and Necessity. 2nd rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chignell, Andrew 2007a. “Belief in Kant,” Philosophical Review 116.3: 72101.
Chignell, Andrew 2007b. “Kant's Concepts of Justification,” Noûs 41.1: 3363.
Chignell, Andrew 2009. “‘As Kant Has Shown…’: Analytic Theology and the Critical Philosophy,” in Analytic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 117–35.
Chignell, Andrew 2010a. “Causal Refutations of Idealism,” Philosophical Quarterly 60.240: 487507.
Chignell, Andrew 2010b. “Real Repugnance and Belief about Things-in-Themselves: A Problem and Kant's Three Solutions,” in Kant's Moral Metaphysics, Krueger, James and Lipscomb, Benjamin Bruxvoort (eds.). Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, pp. 177210.
Chignell, Andrew 2011. “Real Repugnance and Our Ignorance of Things-in-Themselves: A Lockean Problem in Kant and Hegel,” Internationales Jahrbuch Des Deutschen Idealismus 7: 135–59.
Chignell, Andrew 2014a. “Kant and the ‘Monstrous’ Ground of Possibility,” Kantian Review 19.1: 5369.
Chignell, Andrew 2014b. “Modal Motivations for Noumenal Ignorance: Knowledge, Cognition, and Coherence,” Kant-Studien 105.4: 573–97.
Chignell, Andrew 2017. “Kant on Cognition, Givenness, and Ignorance,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55: 131–42.
Chignell, Andrew, and Stang, Nicholas. 2015. “Postulate des Empirischen Denkens,” in Mohr, Georg, Stolzenberg, Juergen, and Willascheck, Marcus (eds.), Kant-Lexicon. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Cleeremans, Axel (ed.) 2003. The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration and Dissociation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coffa, Alberto 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Conant, James 1991. “The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus,” Philosophical Topics 20.1: 115–80.
Dennett, D. C. 1969. Content and Consciousness. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Descartes, René 1985 [CSM]. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Descartes, René 1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 3, Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., and Kenny, A. (ed. and trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DiCenso, James 2011. Kant, Religion, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dummett, Michael 1993. “Realism and Anti-realism,” in Dummett, (ed.), The Seas of Language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 462–78.
Dyck, Corey W. 2011. “Turning the Game against the Idealist: Mendelssohn's Refutation of Idealism in the Morgenstunden and Kant's Replies,” Studies in German Idealism 13: 159–82.
Earman, John 1986. A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Emundts, Dina 2010. “The Refutation of Idealism and the Distinction between Phenomena and Noumena,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason.’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–89.
Engstrom, Stephen 2006. “Understanding and Sensibility,” Inquiry 49: 225.
Engstrom, Stephen 2013. “Unity of Apperception,” Studi Kantiani 26: 3754.
Erdmann, Benno 1881. Nachträge zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft in 1881. Kiel: Lipsius & Tischer.
Evans, Gareth 1975. “Identity and Predication,” in Evans, (ed.), Collected Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2548.
Evans, GarethEvans, 1982. The Varieties of Reference, McDowell, J. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Falkenstein, Lorne 1998. “A Double Edged Sword? Kant's Refutation of Mendel-ssohn's Proof of the Immortality of the Soul and Its Implications for His Theory of Matter,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29.4: 561–88.
Falkenstein, Lorne 2006. “Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Bird, Graham (ed.), A Companion to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 140–53.
Förster, Eckart 2012. Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Friedman, Michael 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Friedman, Michael 2013. Kant's Construction of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, Sebastian 1999. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.
Gardner, Sebastian 2011. “Kant's Practical Postulates and the Limits of the Critical System,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 63: 187215.
Gava, Gabriele 2014. “Kant's Definition of Science in the Architectonic of Pure Reason and the Essential Ends of Reason,” Kant-Studien 105.3: 372–93.
Gava, Gabriele 2016. “The Fallibilism of Kant's Architectonic,” in Gava, G. and Stern, R. (eds.), Pragmatism, Kant and Transcendental Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 46–66.
Gava, Gabriele Forthcoming. “Sind die regulativen Ideen ein doktrinaler Glaube? Über die Rechtfertigung des regulativen Gebrauchs der Ideen im Anhang zur transzendentalen Dialektik” [Are the regulative ideas a doctrinal belief? On the justification of the regulative use of the ideas in the appendix to the transcendental dialectic], in Waibel, V. L. and Ruffing, M. (eds.), Akten des 12. internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Berlin: De Gruyter.
Geiger, Ido 2003. “Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?” Kant-Studien 94.3: 273–98.
Gelfert, Axel 2006. “Kant on Testimony,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14.4: 627–52.
Gettier, Edmund 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23: 121–23.
Gill, Jerry H. 1984. “Kant, Analogy, and Natural Theology,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16.1: 1928.
Ginsborg, Hannah 2006. “Empirical Concepts and the Content of Experience,” European Journal of Philosophy 14.3: 349–72.
Ginsborg, Hannah 2013. “Kant's Perceiver,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87.1: 221–28.
Gloy, Karen (ed.) 1990. “Die Differenz von Verstand und Sinnlichkeit,” in Studien zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants. Würzburg, pp. 141.
Gochnauer, Myron 1974. “Kant's Refutation of Idealism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 195206.
Godlove, Terry 2014. Kant and the Meaning of Religion. New York: Columbia University Press.
Greenberg, Robert 2001. Kant's Theory of A Priori Knowledge. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Grier, Michelle 2001. Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grier, Michelle 2010. “The Ideal of Pure Reason,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 266–89.
Griffith, Aaron 2010. “Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason,” European Journal of Philosophy 20.2: 193222.
Grüne, Stefanie 2017. “Givenness, Objective Reality, and A Priori Intuitions,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55.1: 113–30.
Guyer, Paul 1983. “Kant's Intentions in the Refutation of Idealism,” The Philosophical Review 92.3: 329–83.
Guyer, Paul 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, Paul 1989. “Psychology and the Transcendental Deduction,” in Förster, E. (ed.), Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 4768.
Guyer, Paul 2006. Kant. London: Routledge.
Guyer, Paul 2007. “Debating Allison on Transcendental Idealism,” Kantian Review 12.2: 1024.
Haag, Johannes 2007. Erfahrung und Gegenstand. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Klostermann.
Hanna, Robert 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hanna, Robert 2006. Kant, Science and Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Harper, William 2007. “Comments on Westphal,” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 46.4: 729–36.
Harper, William 2011. Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hatfield, Gary 2006. “Kant on the Perception of Space (and Time),” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6193.
Heidemann, Dietmar 2002. “Anschauung und Begriff. Ein Begründungsversuch des Stämme-Dualisms in Kants Erkenntnistheorie,” in Engelhard, K. (ed.), Aufklärungen. Festschrift für Klaus Düsing zum 60. Geburtstag. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 6590.
Heine, Heinrich 1986. Religion and Philosophy in Germany: A Fragment. Snodgrass, John (trans.). New York: State University of New York Press.
Henrich, Dieter 1969. “The Proof-Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction,” Review of Metaphysics 22.4: 640–59.
Hillman, T. Allan 2010. “Leibniz on the Imago Dei,” in Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven M. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. V. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171213.
Hinske, Norbert 1998. Zwischen Aufklarung und Vernunftkritik. Stuttgart: frommann-holzboog.
Hume, David 1739/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Nidditch, P. H. (ed.) (revision of Selby-Bigge, L. A.). 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, David 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. Norton, D. F. and Norton, M. J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (designated ‘T,’ cited by Book.Part.§.¶ numbers).
Hume, David 2007. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings. Coleman, Dorothy (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James, William 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience. London: Longmans Green.
Janiak, A., and Schliesser, E. 2012. Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kannisto, Toni 2013. “Modality and Metaphysics in Kant,” in Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margit (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten Des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 633–46.
Kant, Immanuel 1900–. Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Reimer/de Gruyter.
Kant, Immanuel 1987. “Vom inneren Sinne (Loses Blatt Leningrad 1; Leningrad Fragment I, NF 364–6),” in Brandt, R. and Stark, W. (eds.), Neue Autographen und Dokumente zu Kants Leben, Schriften und Vorlesungen. Berlin: Felix Meiner, pp. 1821.
Kemp Smith, Norman 1923/1962. A Commentary to Kant's “Critique of Pure Reason.” New York: Humanities Press.
Kemp Smith, Norman 1929. Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.
Kepler, Johannes 1997 [1619]. The Harmony of the World. Aiton, E. J., Duncan, A. M. and Field, J. V. (eds., trans.). Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 209. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Kitcher, Patricia 2011. Kant's Thinker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kneale, William, and Kneale, Martha 1975. The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kuehn, Manfred 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambert, Johann Heinrich 1764. Neues Organon. 2 vols. Leipzig: Wendler.
Land, Thomas 2006. “Kant's Spontaneity Thesis,” Philosophical Topics: Analytic Kantianism 34: 189220.
Langton, Rae 1998. Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Laplace, Pierre Simon de 1847 [1820]. Theorie analylique des probabilites. Paris: V. Courcier. In Oevres de LaPlace, vol. 7. Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1847.
Laywine, Alison 1993. Kant's Early Metaphysics and the Origins of the Critical Philosophy. North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy. Atrascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
Leech, Jessica 2014. “Making Modal Distinctions: Kant on the Possible, the Actual, and the Intuitive Understanding,” Kantian Review 19.3: 339–65.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1989. Philosophical Essays. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel (eds.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1997. New Essays on Human Understanding. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1929 [1956]. Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Dover.
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1970. Collected Papers of Clarence Irving Lewis. Goheen, J. D. and Mothershead, J. L. Jr. (eds.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lighthill, Sir James 1986. “The Recently Recognized Failure of Predictability in Newtonian Dynamics,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 407: 3355.
Locke, John 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, P. H. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Logan, Beryl 1998. “Hume and Kant on Knowing the Deity,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43.3: 133–48.
Longuenesse, Béatrice 1998/2001. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Longuenesse, Béatrice 2008. “Kant's ‘I Think’ versus Descartes’ ‘I Am a Thing That Thinks,’” in Kant and the Early Moderns, Garber, Daniel and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 931.
Longuenesse, Béatrice 2012. “Two Uses of ‘I’ as Subject?” in Immunity to Error through Misidentification, Prosser, Simon and Recanati, François (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81103.
Makkreel, Rudolf A. 2003. “The Cognition–Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34.1: 149–64.
Malebranche, Nicolas 1997. Dialogues on Metaphysics and on Religion. Jolley, Nicholas and Scott, David (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Massimi, Michela 2014. “Prescribing Laws to Nature,” Kant-Studien 105.4: 491508.
Massimi, Michela 2017. “The Legacy of Newton for the Pre-Critical Kant,” in The Oxford Handbook on Newton, Schliesser, E. and Smeenk, C. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDowell, John 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, John 1998. “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality,” Journal of Philosophy 95.9: 431–92.
McDowell, John 2009a. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, John 2009b. “Hegel's Idealism as Radicalization of Kant,” in Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 6989.
McDowell, John 2009c. “Avoiding the Myth of the Given,” in Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 256–72.
McDowell, John 2015. “Putnam on Natural Realism,” in Auxier, R. E., Anderson, D. R., and Hahn, L. E. (eds.), The Philosophy of Hilary Putnam. Chicago: Open Court, pp. 643–58.
Meier, George Friedrich 1752. Auszug aus der Vernuftlehre. Halle, Germany: Gebauer.
Melnick, Arthur 1989. Space, Time, and Thought in Kant. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Mendelssohn, Moses 1997. Moses Mendelssohn: Philosophical Writings. Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mendelssohn, Moses 2011. Morning Hours, or Lectures on God's Existence. Dahlstrom, Daniel and Dyck, Corey W. (trans.). Berlin: Springer.
Milmed, Bella K. 1969. “‘Possible Experience’ and Recent Interpretations of Kant,” in Beck, L. W. (ed.), Kant Studies Today. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, pp. 301–21.
Montaigne, Michel de 2003 [1580]. “An Apology for Raymond Sebond,” in Essays, Screech, M. A. (trans.). London: Penguin Books, pp. 489683.
Moore, A. W. 2010. “The Transcendental Doctrine of Method,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 310–26.
Moore, A. W. 2011. “Bird on Kant's Mathematical Antinomies,” Kantian Review 16.2: 235–43.
Nagel, Ernest 1961. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Newton, Isaac 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Cohen, Bernard, Whitman, Anne, and Budenz, Julia (trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Newton, Isaac 2004. “De Gravitatione,” in Janiak, A. (ed.), Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1239.
Onof, Christian, and Schulting, Dennis 2015. “Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition: On the Note to B160 in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason,” The Philosophical Review 124.1: 158.
O'Shea, James R. 1997. “The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5.2: 216–54.
O'Shea, James R. 2014. Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction and Interpretation. London: Routledge. First published by Acumen, 2012.
Parsons, Charles 1992. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6299.
Pasternack, Lawrence 2010. “Kant's Doctrinal Belief in God,” in Thorndike, Oliver (ed.), Rethinking Kant, vol. 3. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 200–18.
Pasternack, LawrenceThorndike, Oliver 2011. “Kant and Theology at the Boundaries of Reason,” Kantian Review 16.3: 495–98.
Pasternack, LawrenceThorndike, Oliver 2014a. “Kant on Opinion: Assent, Hypothesis, and the Norms of General Applied Logic,” Kant-Studien 105.1: 4182.
Pasternack, LawrenceThorndike, Oliver 2014b. Kant's Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: An Interpretation and Defense. London: Routledge.
Paton, H. J. 1936. Kant's Metaphysic of Experience. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Piché, David 1999. La Condamnation parisienne de 1277. Paris: Vrin.
Pickering, Mark 2016. “Kant's Theoretical Reasons for Belief in Things in Themselves,” Kant-Studien 107.4: 589616.
Pippin, Robert B. 2005. The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plantinga, Alvin 1966. “Kant's Objection to the Ontological Argument,” Journal of Philosophy 63.19: 537–46.
Prauss, Gerold 1969. “Zum Warheitsproblem bei Kant,” Kant-Studien 60: 166–82.
Prauss, Gerold 1971. Erscheinung bei Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Prauss, Gerold 1974. Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.
Proops, Ian 2014. “Kant on the Cosmological Argument,” Philosophers’ Imprint 14.12: 121.
Proops, Ian 2015. “Kant on the Ontological Argument,” Noûs 49.1: 127.
Reich, Klaus 2001. Gesammelte Schriften. With Introduction and annotations. Baum, M., Rameil, U., Reisinger, K., and Scholz, G. (eds.). Hamburg, Germany: Meiner.
Ricoeur, Paul 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Savage, Denis (trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rosenberg, Jay F. 2005. Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford: Clarendon.
Rosenkoetter, Timothy 2010. “Absolute Positing, the Frege Anticipation Thesis, and Kant's Definitions of Judgment,” European Journal of Philosophy 18: 539–66.
Schaffer, Karl Forthcoming. “Kant's Conception of Cognition and Our Knowledge of Things-in-Themselves,” in Stang, Nick (ed.), The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds: New Essays on Kant's Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schliesser, Eric 2013. “On Reading Newton as an Epicurean: Kant, Spinozism and the Changes to the Principia,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 416–28.
Senderowicz, Yaron M. 2005. The Coherence of Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Setiya, Kieran 2004. “Transcendental Idealism in the Aesthetic,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68.1: 6388.
Shabel, Lisa 2003. Mathematics in Kant's Critical Philosophy: Reflections on Mathematical Practice. London: Routledge.
Shabel, Lisa 2010. “The Transcendental Aesthetic,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93117.
Shaffer, Jerome 1962. “Existence, Predication, and the Ontological Argument,” Mind 71.283: 307–25.
Shoemaker, Sydney 1968. “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness,” Journal of Philosophy 65: 555–67.
Shoemaker, Sydney 1970. “Persons and Their Pasts,” American Philosophical Quarterly 7.4: 269–85.
Smith, Donald P. 2003. “Kant on the Dependency of the Cosmological Argument on the Ontological Argument,” European Journal of Philosophy 11.2: 206–18.
Stang, Nicholas 2016. Kant's Modal Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stevenson, Leslie 2003. “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge,” Kantian Review 7.1: 72101.
Strawson, P. F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen.
Strawson, P. F. 1974. “Imagination and Perception,” in Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. London: Methuen, pp. 4565.
Strawson, P. F. 1979. “Perception and Its Objects,” in MacDonald, G. F. (ed.), Perception and Identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 4160.
Strawson, P. F. 1989. “Sensibility, Understanding, and the Doctrine of Synthesis: Comments on Henrich and Guyer,” in Förster, E. (ed.), Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 6977.
Strawson, P. F. 1997a. “Kant's New Foundations of Metaphysics,” in Entity and Identity and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–44.
Strawson, P. F. 1997b. “The Problem of Realism and the A Priori,” in Entity and Identity and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 246–51.
Stroud, Barry 1994. “Kantian Argument, Conceptual Capacities, and Invulnerability,” in Parrini, P. (ed.), Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 231–51.
Sutherland, Daniel 2005. “The Point of the Axioms of Intuition,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86.1: 135–59.
Swinburne, Richard 1996. “The Beginning of the Universe,” Aristotelian Society XL(Suppl.): 139–50.
Tempier, Étienne 1277. Opiniones ducentae undeviginti Sigeri de Brabantia, Boetii de Dacia aliorumque, a Stephano episcopo Parisiensi de consilio doctorum Sacrae Scripturae condemnatae 1277. Paris. http://hiphi.ubbcluj.ro/fam/texte/tempier_opiniones_219.htm.
Tempier, Étienne 1999. Critical edition of Tempier (1277), in Piché, David, La Condamnation parisienne de 1277. Paris: Vrin, pp. 1762.
Tolley, Clinton 2013. “The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions: A New Approach,” Kantian Review 18: 107–36.
Treisman, Anne 2003. “Consciousness and Perceptual Binding,” in Cleeremans, Axel (ed.), The Unity of Consciousness: Binding, Integration and Dissociation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 95113.
Van Cleve, James 1999. Problems from Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vogel, Jonathan 1993. “The Problem of Self-Knowledge in Kant's ‘Refutation of Idealism’: Two Recent Views,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53.4: 875–87.
Walker, Ralph C. S. 1978. Kant. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Walker, Ralph C. S. 1995. “Verificationism, Anti-Realism, and Idealism,” European Journal of Philosophy, 3.3: 257–72.
Warren, Daniel 1998. “Kant and the A Priority of Space,” Philosophical Review 107: 179224.
Watkins, Eric 2000. “Kant on Rational Cosmology,” in Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 7089.
Watkins, Eric 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watkins, Eric 2006. “On the Necessity and Nature of Simples: Leibniz, Wolff, Baumgarten, and the Pre-Critical Kant,” in Garber, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261314.
Watkins, Eric (ed., trans.) 2009. Kant's “Critique of Pure Reason”: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watkins, Eric 2013. “Kant on the Natural, Moral, Human, and Divine Orders,” in The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 219–36.
Watkins, Eric Forthcoming. “Breaking with Rationalism: Kant, Crusius, and the Priority of Existence,” in Look, B. (ed.), Leibniz and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watkins, Eric, and Willaschek, Marcus 2017. “Kant's Account of Cognition,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55: 83112.
Watson, John 1881. Kant and His English Critics: A Comparison of Critical and Empirical Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.
Weizsäcker, C. F., von 1971. “Kant's ‘First Analogy of Experience’ and Conservation Principles of Physics,” Synthese 23: 7595.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004. Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2005. “Kant, Wittgenstein and Transcendental Chaos,” Philosophical Investigations 28.4: 303–23.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007a. “Kant's Anti-Cartesianism,” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 46.4: 709–15.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007b. “Proving Realism Transcendentally: Replies to Rolf George and William Harper,” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 46.4: 737–50.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007c. “Consciousness and Its Transcendental Conditions: Kant's Anti-Cartesian Revolt,” in Heinämaa, S., Lähteenmäki, V., and Remes, P. (eds.), Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 223–43.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2008. “Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell,” in Lindgaard, J. (ed.), John McDowell: Experience, Norm and Nature. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 124–51.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2010. “Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 401–30.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2013a. “Hume, Empiricism and the Generality of Thought,” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 52.2: 233–70.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2013b. “Kant's Cognitive Semantics, Newton's Rule Four of Natural Philosophy and Scientific Realism Today,” in Kant and Contemporary Theory of Knowledge, Kant Yearbook 5:127–68.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2016. “Mind, Language and Behaviour: Kant's Critical Cautions contra Contemporary Internal and Causal Naturalism,” in Babür, S. (ed.), Felsefede Yöntem/Method in Philosophy, special issue of Yeditepe'de Felsefe/Philosophy at Yeditepe, vol. 10. Istanbul: Yedite Üniversi Press, pp. 102–49.
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2017. “Kant's Analytic of Principles,” in Timmons, M. and Baiasu, S. (eds.), Kant. London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1958. The Blue and the Brown Books. New York: Harper.
Wolff, Christian 1740. Philosophia rationalis sive logica, Pars I–III. Frankfurt und Leipzig. Reprinted in Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim: Olms, 1983), 2. Abt., vols. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3.
Wolff, Michael 1995. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Mit einem Essay über Freges “Begriffsschrift.” Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Klostermann.
Wolff, Michael 2000. “Kantische Urteilstafel und vollständige Induktion: Nachtrag zu meiner Kontroverse mit Ulrich Nortmann.” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 54.1: 8694.
Wolff, Michael 2009a. Abhandlung über die Prinzipien der Logik. Mit einer Rekonstruktion der aristotelischen Syllogistik. 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Klostermann.
Wolff, Michael 2009b. “Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40: 341–55.
Wolff, Michael 2010a. “Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant. Eine Stellungnahme zu Theodor Eberts Gegeneinwänden,” Part 1. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 41: 199213.
Wolff, Michael 2010b. “Vollkommene Syllogismen und reine Vernunftschlüsse: Aristoteles und Kant. Eine Stellungnahme zu Theodor Eberts Gegeneinwänden,” Part 2. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 41: 359–71.
Wolff, Michael 2013. “Viele Logiken – Eine Vernunft. Warum der logische Pluralismus ein Irrtum ist,” Methodus: International Journal for Modern Philosophy 7: 73128.
Wolff, Michael Forthcoming. “Kant's Table of Judgments: Frege's Critique and Kant's Rejoinder,” Westphal, K. R. (trans.), Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas 1991. “Conundrums in Kant's Rational Religion,” in Rossi, P. J. and Wreen, M. J. (eds.), Kant's Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 4053.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas 1998. “Is It Possible and Desirable for Theologians to Recover from Kant?” Modern Theology 14.1: 118.
Wood, Allen W. 1970. Kant's Moral Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wood, Allen W. 1978. Kant's Rational Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wood, Allen W. 1992. “Rational Theology, Moral Faith, and Religion,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 394416.
Wood, Allen W. 2005. Kant. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wood, Allen W. 2010. “The Antinomies of Pure Reason,” in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 245–65.
Wright, Crispin 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wright, Crispin 1996. Realism, Meaning and Truth. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell/Polity.
Yong, Peter 2014. “God, Totality and Possibility in Kant's Only Possible Argument,” Kantian Review 19.1: 2751.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.