Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-8tfrx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-29T20:58:21.726Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2017

Eric Watkins
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Allais, Lucy. “What Properly Belongs to Me,” Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (4) (2014): 754–71.Google Scholar
Allais, Lucy. “Kant’s Racism,” Philosophical Papers 45 (1–2) (2016): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. Kant’s Theory of Mind. Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason, expanded edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “Ambiguities in the Will: Reinhold and Kant, Briefe II,” in Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, ed. Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 7189.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “History, Idealism, and Schelling,” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 10 (2012): 123–42.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. Kant’s Elliptical Path, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “The End of the Critiques: Kant’s Moral ‘Creationism,’” in Kant’s Elliptical Path, Oxford: Clarenden Press, 2012, pp. 238–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “On Universality, Necessity, and Law in General in Kant,” in Kant and the Laws of Nature, ed. Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 3048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo (eds.). Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy 33 (1958): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacin, Stefano and Sensen, Oliver (eds.). The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Baum, Manfred. “Kants Replik auf Reinhold,” in Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, ed. Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 153–63.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. “Moral Faith and the Highest Good,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. Guyer, Paul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 588629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, John. “Why Look at Animals,” in About Looking, New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad (eds.). Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1975.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Articulating Reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Breazeale, Daniel. “The Fate of Kantian Freedom: One Cheer (More) for Reinhold,” in Wille, Willkür, Freiheit: Reinholds Freiheitskonzeption im Kontext der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts, ed. Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, pp. 91123.Google Scholar
Brokoff, Jürgen and Schipper, Bernd (eds.). Apokalyptik in Antike und Aufklärung, Paderborn: Schöningh, 2004.Google Scholar
Brown, Raymond E. The Community of the Beloved Disciple, New York: Paulist Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (ed.). Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fenves, Peter. Late Kant: Towards Another Law of the Earth, New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,” in The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “Autonomy, Necessity, and Love,” in Necessity, Volition, and Love, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 129–41.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “On the Usefulness of Final Ends,” in Necessity, Volition, and Love, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 8294.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry,” in Readings in the Philosophy of Language, ed. Ludlow, Peter, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997, pp. 930.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine. “Social Dimensions of Kant’s Conception of Radical Evil,” in Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, ed. Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “From a Practical Point of View: Kant’s Conception of a Postulate of Pure Practical Freedom,” in Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 333–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant on the Theory and Practice of Autonomy,” Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2003): 7098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Inquiry 50 (2007): 444–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Ist und Soll: Von Hume bis Kant, und nun,” in Kant und die Zukunft der Aufklärung, ed. Klemme, Heiner, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009, pp. 210–32.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Problems with Freedom: Kant’s Argument in Groundwork III and Its Subsequent Emendations,” in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. Timmerman, Jens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 176202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. Thought and Action, London: Chatto and Windus, 1959.Google ScholarPubMed
Hampshire, Stuart. Morality and Conflict, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Harris, H. S. Hegel’s Development: Toward the Sunlight, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Phänomenologie des Geistes, Bamburg and Würzburg: Joseph Anton Goebhardt, 1807.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen W., trans. H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Encyclopedia Logic, trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1991.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Science of Logic, trans. George Di Giovanni, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. Moral Literacy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. “Can Morality Be Self-contained? Or: Why Might Kant Think Religion Is Needed to Complete Morality?,” in Nature and Freedom in Kant, ed. Moran, Kate and von Platz, Jeppe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).
Holzhey, Helmut and Kohler, Georg (eds.). In Erwartung eines Endes: Apokalyptik und Geschichte, Zurich: Pano, 2001.Google Scholar
Hurley, Susan. Consciousness in Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark. Surviving Death, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kain, Patrick. “Duties Regarding Animals,” in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. Denis, Lara, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick. “Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason,” in Kant’s Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom and Immortality, ed. Bruxvoort Lipscomb, Benjamin J. and Krueger, James, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010, pp. 211–32.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “The End of All Things,” in On History, ed. Beck, Lewis White, trans. Robert E. Anchor, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963, pp. 6984.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Natural Science, ed. Watkins, Eric, trans. Lewis White Beck, Jeffrey B. Edwards, Olaf Reinhardt, Martin Schönfeld, and Eric Watkins, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings, ed. and trans. Wood, Allen and di Giovanni, George, with an introduction by Robert Merrihew Adams (revised edition), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 193–205.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant’s Second Thoughts on Colonialism,” in Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives, ed. Flikschuh, Katrin and Ypi, Lea, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 4367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Contradiction and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law,” Kant-Studien 108 (1) (2017): 89115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Moral Autonomy As Political Analogy: Self-legislation in Kant’s Groundwork and the Feyerabend Lectures on Natural Law,” in The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory, ed. Stefano Bacin and Oliver Sensen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. and Willaschek, Marcus. “Autonomy without Paradox: Kant on Self-Legislation and the Moral Law,” unpublished manuscript (2017).
Klemme, Heiner. “Einleitung,” in Kant, Immanuel: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, ed. Brandt, Horst D. and Klemme, Heiner, Hamburg: Meiner, 2003, pp. ixlxiii.Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane. “The Poetic Science of Moral Exercise in Early German Romanticism,” Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 6 (2008): 145–61.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Two Distinctions in Goodness,” The Philosophical Review 92 (1983): 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy,” APA Centennial Supplement to The Journal of Philosophical Research 28 (2003): 99122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. Self-Constitution – Agency, Identity, and Integrity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Interacting with Animals: A Kantian Account,” in The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics, ed. Beauchamp, T., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. “Objective and Unconditioned Value,” The Philosophical Review 116 (2007): 157–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. New Essays on Human Understanding, trans. P. Remnant and J. Bennett, Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H., Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. I, Me, Mine. Back to Kant, and Back Again, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue, second edition, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, London: Penguin Books, 1977.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind and World, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. Noble in Reason, Infinite in Faculty, London: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Kate A. “Neither Justice Nor Charity? Kant on ‘General Injustice,’Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (4) (2017): 477–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Seriol. “The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity’s Radical Evil in Kant’s Religion,” The Philosophical Review 114 (1) (2005): 63114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Iain P. D. Kant and the Role of Pleasure in Moral Action, New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. “Constructivisms in Ethics,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89 (1988): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. “Autonomy: The Emperor’s New Clothes,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1) (2003): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. “Autonomy, Plurality and Public Reason,” in New Essays on the History of Autonomy: A Collection Honoring J. B. Schneewind, ed. Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 181–94.Google Scholar
Platz, Jeppe von. “Freedom As Both Fact and Postulate,” in Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010, ed. Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margit, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013, vol. iii, pp. 53346.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O. Word and Object, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip, Essays in the Philosophy of Religion, ed. Miller, Christian, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77 (9) (1980): 515–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Lectures on Moral Philosophy, ed. Herman, Barbara, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie, Zweyter Band, Leipzig: Georg Joachim Göschen, 1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. “Einige Bemerkungen über die in der Einleitung zu den Metaphysischen Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre von I. Kant aufgestellten Begriffe von der Freiheit des Willens,” in Auswahl vermischter Schriften, 2. Teil (Jena, 1797), pp. 364500; reprinted, slightly abbreviated, in Materialien zu Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, ed. Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1975, pp. 310–24.Google Scholar
Ricken, Friedo. “The Postulates of Pure Practical Reason (CprR: 122–148),” in Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy: The German Philosophical Tradition, ed. Ameriks, Karl and Höffe, Otfried, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 213–28.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Political and Legal Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosefeldt, Tobias. “Kants Kompatibilismus,” in Sind wir Bürger zweier Welten? Freiheit und moralische Verantwortung im transzendentalen Idealismus, ed. Brandhorst, Mario, Hahmann, Andree, and Ludwig, Bernd, Hamburg: Meiner, 2012, pp. 77109.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract, in “The Social Contract” and Other Later Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 [1762].Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld. “Kant as ‘Vitalist’: The ‘Principium of Life’ in Anthropologie Friedländer,” in Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, ed. Cohen, Alix, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 151–71.Google Scholar
Schmid, Carl Christian Erhard. Versuch einer Moralphilosophie, Jena: Cröker, 1790.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schönecker, Dieter. Kants Begriff praktischer und transzendentaler Freiheit, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (ed.). Kant on Moral Autonomy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. “The Kantian Conception of Free Will,” Mind XIII (1888): 405–12, reprinted in The Methods of Ethics, seventh edition, London: Macmillan, 1907, pp. 511–16; republished in The Methods of Ethics, seventh edition, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981, pp. 511–16.Google Scholar
Sturma, Dieter. “Self-Consciousness, Personal Identity, and the Challenge of Neuroscience,” in Biology and Subjectivity. Philosophical Contributions to Non-reductive Neuroscience, ed. García-Valdecasas, Miguel, Murillo, José Ignacio, and Barrett, Nathaniel F., Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer, 2016, pp. 1324.Google Scholar
Sussman, David. “Perversity of the Heart,” The Philosophical Review 114 (2) (2005): 153–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David. “Unforgivable Sins?: Revolution and Reconciliation in Kant,” in Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, ed. Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 215–35.Google Scholar
Sussman, David. “Grace and Enthusiasm,” unpublished manuscript presented at the Pacific APA in Vancouver (2015).
Timmermann, Jens. “When the Tail Wags the Dog: Animal Welfare and Indirect Duty in Kantian Ethics,” Kantian Review 10 (2005): 128–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, Johann August Heinrich. Eleutheriologie, oder über Freyheit und Notwendigkeit, Jena: Cröker, 1788.Google Scholar
Varden, Helga. “Kant’s Non-Absolutist Conception of Political Legitimacy – How Public Right ‘Concludes’ Private Right in the “Doctrine of Right,”” Kant-Studien 102 (2010): 331–51.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. The Development of Kant’s View of Ethics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Kant on the Unity and Diversity of Laws,” in Kant and the Laws of Nature, ed. Massimi, Michela and Breitenbach, Angela, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Kant on Real Conditions,” in Akten des 12. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ‘Natur und Freiheit’ in Wien vom 21–25. September 2015, ed. Waibel, Violetta and Ruffing, Margit, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018 (in press).Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Autonomy and the Legislation of Laws in the Prolegomena,” in The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory, ed. Stefano Bacin and Oliver Sensen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. and Willaschek, Marcus. “Kant on Cognition and Knowledge,” Synthese (in press).
Willaschek, Marcus. “Kant and the Necessity of Metaphysics,” in Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant Kongresses, ed. Rodhen, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo R., de Almeida, Guido A, and Ruffing, Margit, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008, vol. i, pp. 285307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. “The Primacy of Pure Practical Reason and the Very Idea of a Postulate,” in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide, ed. Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 168–96.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. “Kant and Peirce on Belief,” in Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy, ed. Gava, Gabriele and Stern, Robert, New York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 133–51.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. “General Introduction,” in Kant, Immanuel, Religion and Rational Theology, ed. Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. xi–xxiv.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. “Kant on Duties Regarding Non-rational Nature,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1998): 189210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. Kant’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (ed. and trans.). Immanuel Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. Kantian Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. “Kant and the Intelligibility of Evil,” in Kant’s Anatomy of Evil, ed. Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. The Free Development of Each, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Crispin. “Truth in Ethics,” Ratio 8 (3) (1995): 209–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Crispin. Truth and Objectivity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter. “Von Reinhold zu Kant: Zur Grundlegung der Moralphilosophie zwischen Vernunft und Willkür,” in K. L. Reinhold: Am Vorhof des Idealismus, ed. Valenza, Pierluigi, Pisa and Rome: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, 2006, pp. 7391.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Eric Watkins, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant on Persons and Agency
  • Online publication: 20 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316856529.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Eric Watkins, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant on Persons and Agency
  • Online publication: 20 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316856529.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Eric Watkins, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant on Persons and Agency
  • Online publication: 20 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316856529.014
Available formats
×