Abbt, Thomas. Zweifel über die Bestimmung des Menschen (1764). In Moses Mendelssohn: Gesammelte Schriften, vol. VI. 2013.Google Scholar

Adelung, Johann C.. Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart: mit beständiger Vergleichung der übrigen Mundarten, besonders aber der Oberdeutschen, First Part, A–E. Vienna: Revidiert von Franz Schönberger, 1808.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Aesthetica. Frankfurt an der Oder: Kleyb, 1750–58.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Aesthetica/Ästhetik, trans. and ed. Mirbach, Dagmar. Hamburg: Meiner, 2007.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysica. Halle: Hemmerde, 1739.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials, trans. and ed. Fugate, Courtney and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury, 2013. (The translation is based on the 1757 edition of Metaphysica.)Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinibus. Halle: Grunert, 1735.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Reflections on Poetry, trans. and ed. Aschenbrenner, Karl and Holther, William. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belon, Pierre. Observations de plusieurs singularitéz et choses mémorables trouvées en Grèce, Asie et Judée. Paris: Corozet, 1553–55.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dublin: Rhaymes, 1710.Google Scholar

Berkeley, George,A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, ed. Winkler, Kenneth. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1982.Google Scholar

de Tubières, Anne-Claude-Philippe, comte de Caylus. Recueil d’Antiquités, Recueil d’antiquités égyptiennes, étrusques, grecques, et romaines, 7 vols. Paris: Desaint & Sailant, 1752–67.Google Scholar

Dubos, Jean Baptiste. Réflexions critiques sur la poésie et sur la peinture. Paris: Mariette, 1719¹, 1733 ², 1740³;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Dubos, Jean Baptiste. Kritische Betrachtungen über die Poesie und Mahlerey, aus dem Französischen des Herrn Abtes Dü Bos, trans. G. Funcke, 3 vols. Copenhagen: Mummische, 1760–61.Google Scholar

Erhard, Johann Benjamin. Ueber das Recht des Volks zu einer Revolution. Jena: Gabler, 1795.Google Scholar

Erhard, Johann Benjamin. “Apologie des Teufels.” Philosophisches Journal einer Gesellschaft Teutscher Gelehrten (ed. Friedrich Immanuel Niethammer), vol. 1, issue 2. Neu-Strelitz: Hof, 1795, 105-40; “Devil’s Apology.” Translated by James Clarke and Conny Rohde. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (2018): 1–22.Google Scholar

Erhard, Johann Benjamin. Über das Recht des Volks zu einer Revolution und andere Schriften, ed. Haasis, Hellmut G.. Munich: Hanser, 1970.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G.. Versuch einer Critik aller Offenbarung, 2nd edn. Königsberg: Hartung, 1792.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G.. Grundlagen des Naturrechts. Jena: Gabler, 1796.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G.. Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: Veith, 1845.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G.. Early Philosophical Writings, trans. and ed. Breazeale, Daniel. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G.. Foundations of Natural Right, trans. Michael Baur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G.. “Review of Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch” trans. Daniel Breazeale. Philosophical Review XXXII (4) (Winter 2001), 311–21.Google Scholar

Garve, Christian and Feder, Johann. “Rezension, Immanuel Kant, Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” In Zugabe zu den Göttingischen Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen (19.1.1782), 40–48.Google Scholar

von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Winckelmann und sein Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Cotta, 1805.Google Scholar

von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Aus meinem Leben. Dichtung und Wahrheit, vol. 3. Tübingen: Cotta, 1814.Google Scholar

von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Werke, ed. Trunz, Erich. München: Beck, 1981–2.Google Scholar

von Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Schriften zur Kunst, Sämtliche Werke, vol. 12. ed. Trunz, Erich. Munich: DTV, 2008.Google Scholar

Albrecht, von Haller. Anfängsgründe der Phisiologie des menschlichen Körpers, 1st edn, trans. Johann Samuel Haller. Berlin: Voss, 1759.Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg. Hamann’s Schriften, 8 vols., ed. Roth, Friedrich. Berlin: Reimer, 1821–43.Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg. Sämtliche Werke, 6 vols., ed. Nadler, Joseph. Wien: Herder, 1949–57.Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg. Briefwechsel, vols. 1–3, 6, ed. Ziesemer, Walther and Henkel, Arthur. Wiesbaden: Insel, 1955–57, 1975.Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg. Briefwechsel, ed. Henkel, Arthur. Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1965–1979.Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg. Hamann: Writings on Philosophy and Language, ed. Haynes, Kenneth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Werke, ed. Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History, trans. H. B. Nisbet. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit: Beytrag zu vielen Beyträgen des Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: Hartknoch, 1774.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Vom Erkennen und Empfinden der menschlichen Seele: Bemerkungen und Träume. Leipzig: Hartknoch, 1778.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit. Leipzig: Hartknoch, 1784¹, 1785 ².Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Gott: einige Gespräche. Gotha: Ettinger, 1787.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Zerstreute Blätter, 6 vols. Gotha: Ettinger, 1785–97.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Verstand und Erfahrung. Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1st edn. Leipzig: Hartknoch, 1799.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Vernunft und Sprache. Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 2nd edn. Leipzig: Hartknoch, 1799.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Kalligone: vom Angenehmen und Schönen. Leipzig: Hartknoch, 1800.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Outlines of a Philosophy of the History of Man, trans. T. Churchill. London: J. Johnson, 1800.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Suphan, Bernhard et al. Berlin: Weidmann, 1877–1913.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Werke in zehn Bänden, ed. Arnold, Günter, Bollacher, Martin, Gaier, Ulrich, et al. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker, 1985–2000.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Werke, ed. Pross, Wolfgang. Munich: Hanser, 1987.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Briefe. Gesamtausgabe 1763–1803, ed. Dobbek, Wilhelm and Arnold, Günter. Weimar: Böhlaus, 1984–2016.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Schriften zur Ästhetik und Literatur 1767–1781, ed. Grimm, Gunter E.. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Schriften zur Literatur und Philosophie 1792–1800, ed. Irmscher, Hans Dietrick. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. London: Crooke, 1651.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. The Leviathan. London: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Hufeland, Gottlieb. Versuch über den Grundsatz des Naturrechts. Leipzig: Göschen, 1785.Google Scholar

Hufeland, Gottlieb. Lehrsätze des Naturrechts und der damit verbundenen Wissenschaften. Jena: Christian Heinrich Cuno’s Erben, 1790.Google Scholar

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature (London, 1739), ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 2nd edn ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Jacobi, F. H.. Ueber die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn. Breslau: Loewe, 1785.Google Scholar

Jacobi, F. H.. Concerning the Doctrine of Spinoza in Letters to Herr Moses Mendelssohn, trans. George di Giovanni. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jacobi, F. H.. David Hume on Faith or Idealism and Realism, A Dialogue, trans. George di Giovanni. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jäsche, Gottlob Benjamin. Immanuel Kants Logik: Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen. Konigsberg: Nicolovius, 1800.Google Scholar

Krug, Wilhelm T.. Allgemeines Handwörterbuch der philosophischen Wissenschaften, nebst ihrer Literatur und Geschichte, vol. 1. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus, 1827.Google Scholar

Le Brun, Corneille. Voyages au Levant, c’est-à-dire dans les principaux endroits de l’Asie Mineure. Delft: Kroonevelt, 1700.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Die philosophischen Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Hildesheim: Olms, 1965.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Writings, trans. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1989.Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Die Erziehung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Voss, 1780.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophie/Theologie, Werke in Sechs Bänden, vol. 6, ed. Fischer, Fritz. Zurich: Stauffer, 1965.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. “Ninety-Five Theses.” In Martin Luther: Selections from His Writings, intro. and ed. Dillenberger, John. New York: Anchor Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. “Proceedings at Augsburg.” In The Annotated Luther, vol. 1: The Roots of Reform, ed. Wengert, Timothy J. et al. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2015.Google Scholar

Maimon, Solomon. “Versuch einer neuen Darstellung des Moralprinzips und Deduktion seiner Realität.” Berlinische Monatsschrift, vol. XXIV (1794), 405–53; “Attempt at a New Presentation of the Principle of Morality and a New Deduction of its Reality.” Translated by Timothy Sean Quinn. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (2018): 1–27.Google Scholar

Maimon, Solomon. “Über die ersten Gründe des Naturrechts.” Philosophisches Journal einer Gesellschaft Teutscher Gelehrten (ed. Niethammer, Friedrich Immanuel), vol. 1, issue 2 (Neu-Strelitz: Hof, 1795), 141–74.Google Scholar

Friedrich Meier, Georg. Anfangsgründe aller schönen Wissenschaften. Halle: Hemmerde, 1748.Google Scholar

Friedrich Meier, Georg. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Gebauer, 1752.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Über die Empfindungen. Berlin: Voss, 1755.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. “Betrachtungen über das Erhabene und das Naive in den schönen Wissenschaften.” Bibliothek der schönen Künste und Wissenschaften, vol. 2, issue 2 (Leipzig: Dyck, 1758), 229–67.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophische Schriften. Berlin: Voss, 1761.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Jerusalem oder über religöse Macht und Judentum. Berlin: Maurer, 1783.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Morgenstunden. Berlin: Voss, 1785.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. An die Freunde Lessings. Berlin: Voss, 1786.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Gesammelte Schriften: Jubilaeum Ausgabe, ed. Bamberger, Fritz et al. Stuttgart–Bad Canstatt: frommann-holzboog. 1929–.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Jerusalem: Or on Religious Power and Judaism, trans. Allan Arkush. Hanover, NH: Brandeis University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Moses Mendelssohn: Selections from His Writings, ed. Jospe, Eva. New York, NY: Viking Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings, ed. Dahlstrom, D. O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Morning Hours, trans. D. O. Dahlstrom and Corey Dyck. Amsterdam: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. Last Works, trans. Bruce Rosenstock. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Charles, de Montesquieu. De l’Esprit des lois (1748), ed. Goldschmidt, V., 2nd edn, 2 vols. Paris: Flammarion, 1993–94.Google Scholar

Moser, Johann Jakob. Grund-Riß der heutigen Staats-Verfassung des Teutschen Reichs, 6th edn. Tübingen: Cotta, 1748.Google Scholar

Moser, Johann Jacob. Von der Teutschen Religions-Verfassung. Frankfurt and Leipzig, 1774.Google Scholar

Proclus, . In Platonis Timaeum commentaria, 3 vols., ed. Diehl, Ernst. Leipzig: Teubner, 1903–6.Google Scholar

Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie, 2nd edn. Leipzig: Göschen, 1790–92.Google Scholar

Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Bondeli, Martin. Basel: Schwabe, 2007.Google Scholar

Rosenkranz, Karl. “Geschichte der Kantischen Philosophie.” In Immanuel Kant’s Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Rosenkranz, K. and Schubert, F. W., vol. XII (1840). Leipzig: Voss, 1838–42.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l’origine et les fondemens de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. Amsterdam: Rey, 1755.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Œuvres completes, vol. III: Du contrat social, écrits politiques, ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Basic Political Writings, ed. Cress, Donald A.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, ed. Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. Werke, Nationalausgabe, ed. Petersen, Julius et al. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1943.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. Essays, ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel O. and Hinderer, Walter. New York, NY: Continuum, 1993.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. Schiller’s “On Grace and Dignity” in Its Cultural Context: Essays and a New Translation, ed. and trans. Curran, Jane and Fricker, Christophe. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2005.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich. Friedrich Schiller: Poet of Freedom, trans. Caroline Stephan and Robert Traut. Washington, DC: Schiller Institute, 2015.Google Scholar

Schmalz, Theodor. Das reine Naturrecht. Königsberg: Nicolovius, 1792.Google Scholar

Cooper, Anthony Ashley, Third Earl of Shaftesbury. Characteristicks of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (London: Darby, 1714), ed. Klein, Lawrence E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Tafinger, Wilhelm Gottlieb. Encyclopädie und Geschichte der Rechte in Teutschland. Erlangen: Palm: 1789.Google Scholar

Vasari, Giorgio. Le Vite de’ più eccellenti pittori, scultori, e architettori. Fiorenza: Lorenzo Torrentino, 1550.Google Scholar

Vasari, Giorgio. The Lives of the Artists, trans. Julia Conaway Bondanella and Peter Bondanella. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums. Dresden: Walther Hof, 1764.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Reflections on the Painting and Sculpture of the Greeks with Instructions for the Connoisseur, and an Essay on Grace in Works of Art, trans. Henry Fusseli. London: Millar, 1765.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. An Answer to the Foregoing Letter and a Further Explication of the Subject, trans. Henry Fusseli. London: Millar, 1765.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Kleine Schriften. Vorreden. Entwürfe, ed. Rehm, Walther. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1968; 2nd. edn, 2002.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Reflections on the Imitation of Greek Works in Painting and Sculpture, trans. Elfriede Heyer and Roger C. Norton. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1987.Google Scholar

Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums, ed. Borbein, Adolf H., Gaehtgens, Thomas W., Irmscher, Johannes, and Kunze, Max. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern, 2002.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. History of the Art of Antiquity, trans. Harry Francis Mallgrave. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications, 2006.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. Johann Winckelmann on Art, Architecture, and Archaeology, trans. David Carter. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2013.Google Scholar

Wizenmann, Thomas. Die Resultate der Jacobischen und Mendelssohnschen Philosophie, kritisch untersucht von einem Freywilligen. Leipzig: Göschen, 1786.Google Scholar

Wizenmann, Thomas. “An den Herrn Professor Kant von dem Verfasser der Resultate Jacobischer und Mendelssohnscher Philosophie.” Deutsches Museum, vol. I (February 1787), 115–56.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Vernünftige Gedancken von der Menschen Tun und Lassen zu Beförderung ihrer Glückseeligkeit. Frankfurt/ Leipzig, 1720; 4th edn 1733. In Gesammelte Werke, vol. I.4, ed. Arndt, Hans Werner. Hildesheim: Olms, 1976;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Wolff, Christian Discursus Praeliminaris de Philosophia in Genere. In Philosophia rationalis sive logica. Frankfurt/Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana, 1728;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Psychologia Empirica. Frankfurt/Leipzig: Libraria Rengeriana, 1732.Google Scholar

Wolff, ChristianGesammelte Werke, Division 2, vol. 3: Psychologia Empirica, ed. École, Jean et al. Hildesheim: Olms, 2001.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Anmerckungen zur Deutschen Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main, 1740. Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms, 1983.Google Scholar

Wolff, Christian. Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Magdeburg, 1751. Reprint: Hildesheim: Olms, 1983.Google Scholar

Achella, Stefania 2016. “Hufeland, Gottlieb (1760–1817).” In Klemme, Heiner and Kuehn, Manfred (eds.), The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 365–68.Google Scholar

Alexander, W. M. 1966. Johann Georg Hamann: Philosophy and Faith. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry 1986. “The Concept of Freedom in Kant's Semi-Critical Ethics.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 68: 96–115.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry 1990a. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry 1990b. Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Altmann, Alexander 1973. Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Study. Portland, OR: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.Google Scholar

Altmann, Alexander 1976. “Lessings Glaube an die Seelenwanderung.” Lessing Yearbook VIII, 7–41.Google Scholar

Altmann, Alexander 1982. “The Quest for Liberty in Moses Mendelssohn’s Political Philosophy.” Lessing Yearbook Supplement: Humanität und Dialog 1982, 37–65.Google Scholar

Anderson, Lisa Marie 2008. Hegel on Hamann. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Lisa Marie 2012. Hamann and the Tradition. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Arkush, Allan 1994. Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Atwell, J. E. 1974. “The Uniqueness of a Good Will.” In Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. New York, NY: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Baeumler, Alfred 1923. Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft. Halle an der Saale. Reprint: Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1967.Google Scholar

Basch, Victor 1896. Essai critique sur l’esthétique de Kant. Ph.D. thesis, Faculté des lettres de Paris. Reprint: Paris: Baillière.Google Scholar

Batscha, Zwi 1972. “Johann Benjamin Erhards Politische Theorie.” Jahrbuch für Deutsche Geschichte 1, 53–75.Google Scholar

Baum, Manfred 1990. “Kritik.” In Müller, Gerhard (ed.), Theologische Realenzyklopädie, vol. 20. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 65–77.Google Scholar

Baum, Manfred 1993. “Das Lebendige in Hegels früher Metaphysik.” In Gloy, Karen and Burger, Paul (eds.), Die Naturphilosophie im Deutschen Idealismus. Stuttgart: frommann-holzboog, pp. 224–37.Google Scholar

Baum, Manfred 2001. “Systemform und Selbsterkenntnis der Vernunft bei Kant.” Fulda und Stolzenberg 2001, 25–40.Google Scholar

Baum, Manfred 2013. “Herder über Kants ‘Verfehlte Kritik der reinen Vernunft’.” In Heinz, Marion (ed.) 2013a. Herders “Metakritik”: Analysen und Interpretationen. Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog, pp. 209–28.Google Scholar

Baumgardt, David 1963. “The Ethics of Salomon Maimon (1753–1800).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 1(2), 199–210.Google Scholar

Bayer, Oswald 1990. “Hamanns Metakritik im ersten Entwurf.” Kant-Studien 81(4), 435–53.Google Scholar

Bayer, Oswald 1998. “Hamann als radikaler Aufklärer.” In Bayer, Oswald (ed.), J. G. Hamann: “Der hellste Kopf seiner Zeit,” Tübingen: Attempo, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar

Bayer, Oswald 2002. Vernunft ist Sprache. Stuttgart–Bad Canstatt: frommann-holzboog.Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White 1960. A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Beiser, Fredrick 1987. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Beiser, Fredrick 2002. German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism 1781–1801. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Beiser, Fredrick 2005. Schiller as Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beiser, Fredrick 2009. Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beiser, Fredrick 2011. The German Historicist Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, David 1984. Spinoza in Germany from 1670 to the Age of Goethe. London: Institute of Germanic Studies, University of London.Google Scholar

Benz, Ernst 1957. “Die Reinkarnationslehre in Dichtung und Philosophie der deutschen Klassik und Romantik.” Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte 9, 167–73.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah 1993. The Magus of the North: J. G. Hamann and the Origins of Modern Irrationalism. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar

Betz, John R. 2012. After Enlightenment: The Post-Secular Vision of J. G. Hamann. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blanke, Fritz 1928. “Hamann und Luther.” Luther-Jahrbuch 10, 28–55.Google Scholar

Boehm, Omri 2014. Kant’s Critique of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bohatec, Josef 1938. Die Religionsphilosophie Kants in der “Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft.” Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer theologisch-dogmatischen Quellen. Hamburg: Hoffmann & Campe.Google Scholar

Bollacher, Martin 1989. “Kommentar.” In Herder, G. W. F., Werke in zehn Bänden, ed. Arnold, Günter, Bollacher, Martin, Gaier, Ulrich et al. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker, vol. 6, pp. 899–942.Google Scholar

Boswell, Terry 1988. “On the Textual Authenticity of Kant’s Logic.” History and Philosophy of Logic 9(2), 193–203.Google Scholar

Buchenau, Stefanie 2017. “Herder: Physiology and Philosophical Anthropology.” In Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology, ed. Waldrow, Anik and DeSouza, Nigel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–93.Google Scholar

Burger, Ewald 1929. J. G. Hamann. Schöpfung und Erlösung im Irrationalismus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith 2012. Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst 1916. Freiheit und Form: Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte. Berlin: Cassirer.Google Scholar

Chance, Brian A. and Lawrence Pasternack (forthcoming). “Baumgarten and Kant on Rational Theology: Deism, Theism and the Role of Analogy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics, ed. Courtney Fugate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chignell, Andrew 2007. “Belief in Kant.” Philosophical Review 116, no. 3: 323–360.Google Scholar

Clarke, James A. 2014. “Fichte’s Transcendental Justification of Human Rights.” In Rockmore, Tom and Breazeale, Daniel (eds.), Fichte and Transcendental Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 242–57.Google Scholar

Clarke, James A. 2016. “Fichte’s Independence Thesis.” In Gottlieb, Gabriel, Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–51.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen 1977. “Two Kinds of Respect.” Ethics 88(1), 36–49.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen 2005. “Fichte and the Second-Person Standpoint.” In Ameriks, Karl and Stolzenberg, Jürgen (eds.), Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus (International Yearbook of German Idealism), vol. 3. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 91–113.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Décultot, Élisabeth 2000. Johann Joachim Winckelmann: Enquête sur la genèse de l’histoire de l’art. Paris: Presse Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Décultot, Elisabeth and Martin, Dönike 2017. “Politik: Kunst, Macht, Gesellschaft.” In Elisabeth Décultot, Martin Dönike, Wolfgang Holler, Claudia Keller, Thorsten Valk and Bettina Werche (eds.), Winckelmann. Moderne Antike (catalogue of the exhibition, Weimar, Neues Museum, April-July 2017). Munich: Hirmer Verlag, pp. 296–297Google Scholar

Deligiorgi, Katerina 2005. Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Deligiorgi, Katerina 2011. “The Proper Telos of Life: Schiller, Kant, and Having Autonomy as an End.” Inquiry 54(5), 494–511.Google Scholar

DeSouza, Nigel 2012a. “Language, Reason, and Sociability: Herder’s Critique of Rousseau.” Intellectual History Review 22, 221–40.Google Scholar

DeSouza, Nigel 2012b. “Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century: Herder’s Critical Reflections on the Principes de la nature et de la grace.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20, 773–95.Google Scholar

DeSouza, Nigel 2014. “The Soul-Body Relationship and the Foundations of Morality: Herder contra Mendelssohn.” Herder Yearbook 21, 145–61.Google Scholar

DeSouza, Nigel 2016a. “Aufklärerische Selbstentwürfe.” In Greif, Stefan, Heinz, Marion, and Clairmont, Heinrich (eds.), Herder Handbuch. Paderborn: Fink, pp. 71–121.Google Scholar

DeSouza, Nigel 2016b. “On the Relation between Herder’s Idealism and His Theory of the Soul-Body Relationship.” In Hüning, Dieter, Stiening, Gideon, and Stolz, Violetta (eds.), Herder und die klassische deutsche Philosophie. Stuttgart: frommann-holzboog, pp. 281–304.Google Scholar

DeSouza, Nigel 2017. “The Metaphysical and Epistemological Foundations of Herder’s Philosophical Anthropology.” In Waldow, Anik and DeSouza, Nigel (eds.), Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–71.Google Scholar

Dickie, George 1996. The Century of Taste: The Philosophical Odyssey of Taste in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dickson, Gwen Griffith 1995. Johann Georg Hamann’s Relational Metacriticism. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Duchet, Michèle 1995. Anthropologie et histoire au siècle des Lumières: Buffon, Voltaire, Rousseau, Helvétius, Diderot, 3rd edn. Paris: Michel.Google Scholar

Dunning, Stephen 1979. The Tongues of Men: Hegel and Hamann on Religious Language and History. Missoula, MO: Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Düsing, Klaus 1971. “Das Problem des höchsten Guts in Kants praktischer Philosophie.” Kant-Studien 62: 5–42.Google Scholar

Eisfeld, Jens 2015. Erkenntnis, Rechtserzeugung und Staat bei Kant und Fichte. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Eldridge, Richard 2016. Images of History: Kant, Benjamin, Freedom, and the Human Subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Erlin, Matt 2002. “Reluctant Modernism: Modes Mendelssohn’s Philosophy of History.” Journal of the History of Ideas 63(1), 83–104.Google Scholar

Flikschuh, Katrin 2007. “Duty, Nature, Right: Kant’s Response to Mendelssohn in Theory and Practice III.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4(2), 223–41.Google Scholar

Fick, Monicka 2004. Lessing Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul 2005. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul 2006. “The Discovery of the Other: Cavell, Fichte, and Skepticism.” In Crary, Alice and Shieh, Sanford (eds.), Reading Cavell. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 166–203.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul 2016. “Fichte’s Kabbalistic Realism: Summons as ẓimẓum.” In Gottlieb, Gabriel (ed.), Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–116.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy, and Honneth, Axel, 2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar

Friedeburg, Robert von, and Seidler, Michael J. 2008. “The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.” In Lloyd, Howell A., Burgess, Glenn, and Hodson, Simon (eds.), European Political Thought 1450–1700: Religion, Law and Philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 102–72.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael 1992. Kant and the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fritsch, Friedmann 1999. Communicatio idiomatum: zur Bedeutung einer christologischen Bestimmung für das Denken Johann Georg Hamanns. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fritsch, Matthias J. 2007. “Naturrecht und katholische Aufklärung im 18. Jahrhundert.” In Kremer, Markus and Reuter, Hans-Richard (eds.), Macht und Moral – Politisches Denken im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, pp. 92–103.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Ralf-Peter 2010. Ein “Medium zum Frieden”: Die Normaljahresregel und die Beendigung des Dreißigjährigen Krieges. Munich: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, Ralf-Peter 2015. “Die Normaljahrsrestitutionen 1648–1653: die Umsetzung des Westfälischen Friedens durch Schweden, Reichshofrat und Reichsstände.” In Wendehorst, Stephan (ed.), Die Anatomie frühneuzeitlicher Imperien. Herrschaftsmanagement jenseits von Staat und Nation: Institutionen, Personal und Techniken. Oldenbourg: De Gruyter, pp. 349–64.Google Scholar

Fugate, Courtney 2014. The Teleology of Reason: A Study of the Structure of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gajek, Bernhard 1967. Sprache beim jungen Hamann. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar

Gestrich, Andreas and Lächele, Rainer (eds.) 2002. Johann Jacob Moser: Politiker, Pietist, Publizist. Heidelberg: SpringerGoogle Scholar

Giordanetti, Piero E. 1995. “Kant und Winckelmann. Beobachtungen zu einer Quelle der Kritik der ästhetischen Urteilskraft.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress (Memphis, 1995), vol. 2. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, pp. 463–571.Google Scholar

Gniffke, Franz 1984. “Die Gegenwärtigkeit des Mythos in Kants Mutmaßungen über den Anfang der Menschengeschichte.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 38(4), 593–608.Google Scholar

Goetschel, Willi 2005. “Lessing and the Jews.” In Fischer, Barbara and Fox, Thomas (eds.), A Companion to the Works of Gotthold Ephraim Lessing. New York, NY: Boydell & Brewer, pp. 185–208.Google Scholar

Goetschel, Willi 2007. “Mendelssohn and the State.” MLN 122, 472–92.Google Scholar

Goetschel, Willi 2011. “Einstimmigkeit in Differenz: Der Begriff der Aufklärung bei Kant und Mendelssohn.” Text + Kritik 5, 79–98.Google Scholar

Goldfriedrich, J. 1895. Kants Ästhetik. Leipzig: Strübig.Google Scholar

González, Catalina 2015. “Kant, Cicero, and ‘Popularity’ in the Lectures on Logic.” In Dörflinger, Bernd et al. (eds.), Kant’s Lectures (Kants Vorlesungen). Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 47–60.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Gabriel 2015. “Fichte’s Deduction of the External World.” International Philosophical Quarterly 55, 217–34.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Gabriel 2016a. Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Gabriel 2016b. “Fichte’s Developmental View of Self-Consciousness.” In Gottlieb, Gabriel (ed.), Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–37.Google Scholar

Gray, Jonathan 2012. “Hamann, Nietzsche, and Wittgenstein on the Language of the Philosophers.” In Anderson, Lisa Marie (ed.), Hamann and the Tradition. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 104–21.Google Scholar

Gründer, Karlfried 1958. Figur und Geschichte. Johann Georg Hamanns “Biblische Betrachtungen” als Ansatz einer Geschichtsphilosophie. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar

Gundolf, Friedrich 1911. Shakespeare und der deutsche Geist. Berlin: Bondi.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul 1979/1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste, rev. edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul 1993. Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul 2000. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul 2006. “Kant’s Ambitions in the Third Critique.” In Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 538–87.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul 2008. Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant’s Response to Hume. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul 2014. A History of Modern Aesthetics, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud 2006. “German Natural Law.” In Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert (eds.), The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–90.Google Scholar

Haasis, Hellmut 1970. “Nachwort.” In Haasis, Hellmut (ed.), Johann Benjamin Erhard, Über das Recht des Volks zu einer Revolution und andere Schriften. Munich: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar

Hammerstein, Notker 1986. “Universitäten – Territorialstaaten – Gelehrte Räte.” In Schnur, Roman (ed.), Die Rolle der Juristen bei der Enstehung des modernen Staates. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 687–735.Google Scholar

Härter, Karl 2013. “The Early Modern Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation (1495–1806): A Multi-Layered Legal System.” In Duindam, Jeroen et al. (eds.), Law and Empire: Ideas, Practices, Actors. Leiden: Brill, pp. 111–31.Google Scholar

Haug-Moritz, Gabriele 1992. “Kaisertum und Parität: Reichspolitik und Konfessionen nach dem Westfälischen Frieden.” Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 19, 445–82.Google Scholar

Haym, Rudolf 1877. Herder nach seinem Leben und seinen Werken dargestellt. Berlin: Gaertner.Google Scholar

Heckel, Martin 1983. Deutschland im konfessionellen Zeitalter. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Heckel, Martin 1989a. “Parität (I).” In Schlaich, Klaus (ed.), Martin Heckel, Gesammelte Schriften: Staat, Kirche, Recht, Geschichte, vol. 1. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 106–226.Google Scholar

Heckel, Martin 1989b. “Zur Entwicklung des deutschen Staatskirchenrechts von der Reformation bis zur Schwelle der Weimarer Verfassung.” In Schlaich, Klaus (ed.), Martin Heckel, Gesammelte Schriften: Staat, Kirche, Recht, Geschichte, vol. 1. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 366–401.Google Scholar

Heckel, Martin 1989c. “Zu Tradition und Fortschritt im Kirchenrecht.” In Schlaich, Klaus (ed.), Martin Heckel, Gesammelte Schriften: Staat, Kirche, Recht, Geschichte, vol. 2. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 613–35.Google Scholar

Heckel, Martin 1997. “Religionsfreiheit: Eine säkulare Verfassungsgarantie.” In Schlaich, Klaus (ed.), Martin Heckel, Gesammelte Schriften: Staat, Kirche, Recht, Geschichte, vol. 4. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 647–849.Google Scholar

Heckel, Martin 2007. Vom Religionskonflikt zur Ausgleichsordnung: Der Sonderweg des deutschen Staatskirchenrechts vom Augsburger Religionsfrieden 1555 bis zur Gegenwart. Munich: Bavarian Academy of Sciences/C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Heimsoeth, Heinz 1967. “Consciousness of Personality and the Thing in Itself in Kant’s Philosophy.” In Gram, Moltke S. (ed.), Kant: Disputed Questions. Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Press, pp. 237–76.Google Scholar

Heinrich, Gerd 1981. “Religionstoleranz in Brandenburg-Preußen. Idee und Wirklichkeit.” In Schlenke, Manfred (ed.), Preussen, Versuch einer Bilanz, Vol. 2: Beiträge zu einer politischen Kultur. Reinbeck: Rowohlt, pp. 61–88.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion 1992. “Die Bestimmung des Menschen. Herder contra Mendelssohn.” In Niemeyer, Beate and Schütze, Dirk (eds.), Philosophie der Endlichkeit. Festschrift für Erich Christian Schröder zum 65. Geburtstag. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, pp. 263–85.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion 1994. Sensualistischer Idealismus: Untersuchungen zur Metaphysik und Erkenntnistheorie des jungen Herder (1763–1778). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion(ed.) 1997. Herder und die Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion 2006. “Grundzüge der Geschichtsphilosophie in Reinholds Briefen zur kantischen Philosophie.” In Valenza, Pierluigi (ed.), K.L. Reinhold. Am Vorhof des Idealismus. Pisa: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali, pp. 313–26.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion(ed.) 2013a. Herders “Metakritik”: Analysen und Interpretationen. Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion 2016. “Gott, einige Gespräche.” In Greif, Stefan, Heinz, Marion, and Clairmont, Heinrich (eds.), Herder Handbuch. Paderborn: Fink, pp. 240–65.Google Scholar

Greif, Stefan, Heinz, Marion, and Clairmont, Heinrich 2018. “The Metaphysical Foundation of Subjective Philosophy in Herder’s Essay on Being.” In Noyes, John K. (ed.), Herder’s “Essay on Being”: A Translation and Critical Commentary. Rochester, NY: Camden House.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion, and Clairmont, Heinrich 2009. “Herder’s Epistemology.” In Adler, Hans and Koepke, Wulf (eds.), A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder. Rochester, NY: Camden House, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion, and Nachtsheim, Stephen 2016. “Kalligone.” In Greif, Stefan, Heinz, Marion, and Clairmont, Heinrich (eds.), Herder Handbuch. Paderborn: Fink, pp. 284–317.Google Scholar

Hense, Martin 2012. “eine Palingenesie und Metempsychose […] ehemals fremder, jetzt eigner Gedanken.” Seelenwanderungsbegriffe in Philosophie und Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts. Ph.D. dissertation, Freie Universität, Berlin.Google Scholar

Hochman, Leah 2014. The Ugliness of Moses Mendelssohn: Aesthetics, Religion, and Morality in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. Joel Anderson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian 2001. Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian 2002. “The Morals of Metaphysics: Kant’s Groundwork as Intellectual Paideia.” Critical Inquiry 28, 908–29.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian 2005. “Kant’s Religion and Prussian Religious Policy.” Modern Intellectual History 2, 1–27.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian 2011. “Natural Law as Political Philosophy.” In Clark, Desmond and Wilson, Catherine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 475–99.Google Scholar

Hunter, Ian 2014. “Religious Freedom in Early Modern Germany: Theology, Philosophy, and Legal Casuistry.” South Atlantic Quarterly 113(1), 37–62.Google Scholar

Irmscher, Hans Dietrich, and Adler, Emil 1979. Der handschriftliche Nachlass Johann Gottfried Herders. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Insole, Christoper J. 2015. “A Thomistic Reading of Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Searching for the Unconditioned.” Modern Theology 31(2), 284–311.Google Scholar

Jordan, Stefan Jens 2003. Leben und Werk des Tübinger Rechtsprofessors Wilhelm Gottlieb Tafinger (1760–1813). Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Sven-Aage (ed.) 1968. Johann Georg Hamann. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

Kersting, Wolfgang 1984. Wohlgeordnete Freiheit. Immanuel Kants Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kersting, Wolfgang 2001. “Die Unäbhangigkeit des Rechts von der Moral (Einleitung).” In Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar

Keßler, Martin 2009. “Herder’s Theology.” In Adler, Hans and Koepke, Wulf (eds.), A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder. Rochester, NY: Camden House, pp. 247–75.Google Scholar

Kleinhagenbrock, Frank 2010. “Konservierung oder Weiterentwicklung des Religionsfriedenssystems von 1648? Das Reichskammergericht in den Konflikten um die Besitzstände der Konfessionsparteien.” In Battenberg, Friedrich and Schildt, Bernd (eds.), Das Reichskammergericht im Spiegel seiner Prozessakten. Bilanz und Perspectiven der Forschung. Cologne: Böhlau, pp. 179–97.Google Scholar

Koepke, Wulf 1992. “Herders Zerstreute Blätter und die Struktur der Sammlung,” Herder Yearbook 1, 98–117.Google Scholar

Koepke, Wulf 2005. “The Reception of Schiller in the Twentieth Century.” In Martinson, Steven D. (ed.), A Companion to the Works of Friedrich Schiller. Rochester, NY: Camden House, pp. 271–95.Google Scholar

Kondylis, Panajotis 1981/2002 (reprint). Die Aufklärung im Rahmen des neuzeitlichen Rationalismus. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Korff, August 1923. Geist der Goethezeit, vol. 1: Sturm und Drang. Leipzig: Weber.Google Scholar

Kosch, Michelle 2017. “Individuality and Right in Fichte’s Ethics.” Philosophers’ Imprint 17(12), 1–23.Google Scholar

Kostlin, Julius 1883. The Life of Martin Luther. Philadelphia, PA: Lutheran Publication Society.Google Scholar

Kulenkampff, Jens 1974. Materialien zu Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Lächele, Rainer 2002. “‘Ich habe … Mich Nimmermehr Entschliessen Können, Mich Unter Sie Zu Begeben.’ Johann Jacob Moser und die Herrnhuter.” In Gestrich, Andreas and Lächele, Rainer (eds.), Johann Jacob Moser: Politker, Pietist, Publizist. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Roland M. 2013. Die Transformation des Kirchenbegriffs in der Frühaufklärung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Lowrie, Walter 1950. Johann Georg Hamann: an Existentialist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lu-Adler, Huaping 2015. “Constructing a Demonstration of Logical Rules, or How to Use Kant’s Logic Corpus.” In Clewis, Robert (ed.), Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Luh, Jürgen 1995. Unheiliges Römisches Reich. Der konfessionelle Gegensatz 1648 bis 1806. Berlin: Verlag für Berlin-Brandenburg.Google Scholar

Macor, Laura Anna 2013. Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1748–1800). Eine Begriffsgeschichte. Stuttgart–Bad Cannstatt: fromann-holzboog.Google Scholar

Maliks, Reidar 2014. Kant’s Politics in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Markworth, Tino 2005. Unsterblichkeit und Identität beim frühen Herder. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

McCumber, John 1997. “Hegel and Hamann: Ideas and Life.” In Baur, Michael and Russon, John (eds.), Hegel and the Tradition: Essays in Honor of H.S. Harris. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar

McQuillan, J. Colin 2014. “Kant and Mendelssohn’s Jerusalem.” Journal of the History of Ideas 75(4), 581–604.Google Scholar

McQuillan, J. Colin 2015. Early Modern Aesthetics. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

McQuillan, J. Colin 2017. “Clear and Distinct Ideas in Eighteenth Century Germany: Metaphysics, Logic, Aesthetics.” In Rodriguez, Manuel Sánchez and Escribano, Miguel (eds.), Leibniz en Dialogo. Seville: Themata.Google Scholar

Mensch, Jennifer 2014. “From Crooked Wood to Moral Agency: On Anthropology and Ethics in Kant.” Estudos Kantianos 2(1), 185–204.Google Scholar

Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.) 2001. Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Metzke, Erwin 1967. J.G. Hamanns Stellung in der Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Miersemann, Wolfgang 2002. “Dichten Als ‘Dienst’ Am ‘Neben-Christen.’ Zu Johann Jacob Mosers Liedschaffen.” In Gestrich, Andreas and Lächele, Rainer (eds.), Johann Jacob Moser: Politker, Pietist, Publizist. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 100–30.Google Scholar

Milton, Patrick 2016. “The Early Eighteenth-Century German Confessional Crisis: The Juridification of Religious Conflict in the Reconfessionalized Politics of the Holy Roman Empire.” Central European History 49, 39–68.Google Scholar

Moggach, Douglas 2009. “Freedom and Perfection: German Debates on the State in the Eighteenth Century.” Canadian Journal of Political Science (Revue canadienne de science politique) 42(4), 1003–23.Google Scholar

Moland, Lydia L. 2002. “Fight, Flight or Respect? First Encounters of the Other in Kant and Hegel.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 19(4), 381–400.Google Scholar

Nadler, Joseph 1949. Johann Georg Hamann. Salzburg: Müller.Google Scholar

Nadler, Käte 1937. “Die deutsche Hamannforschung im ersten Drittel des 20. Jahrhunderts.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 15, 32–68.Google Scholar

Nance, Michael 2015. “Recognition, Freedom, and the Self in Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right.” European Journal of Philosophy 23(3), 608–32.Google Scholar

Nannini, Alessandro 2015. “Ancient or Modern: Alexander Baumgarten and the Coming of Age of Aesthetics,” Filozofija I Društvo 36(3), 629–51.Google Scholar

Nassar, Dalia 2017. “Understanding as Explanation: The Significance of Herder’s and Goethe’s Science of Describing.” In Waldow, Anik and DeSouza, Nigel (eds.), Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 106–24.Google Scholar

Neiman, Susan 1997. The Unity of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick 1994. “Fichte and the Relationship between Right and Morality.” In Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Fichte: Historical Contexts/Contemporary Controversies. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, pp. 158–80.Google Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick 2000. “Introduction.” In Baur, Michael (ed.), Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. vii–xxviii.Google Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick 2010. “Rousseau and the Human Drive for Recognition (Amour Propre).” In Schmidt am Busch, Hans-Christoph and Zurn, Christopher F. (eds.), The Philosophy of Recognition. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 21–46.Google Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick 2016. “Fichte’s Separation of Right from Morality.” In Gottlieb, Gabriel (ed.), Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–51.Google Scholar

Nomer, Nedim 2010. “Fichte and the Relationship between Self-Positing and Rights.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48, 469–90.Google Scholar

Nomer, Nedim 2013. “Fichte’s Separation Thesis.” Philosophical Forum 44, 233–54.Google Scholar

O’Flaherty, James C. 1979. Johann Georg Hamann. Boston, MA: Twayne.Google Scholar

Pasternack, Lawrence 2011a. “The Development and Scope of Kantian Belief: The Highest Good, the Practical Postulates, and the Fact of Reason.” Kant-Studien 102(3), 290–315.Google Scholar

Pasternack, Lawrence 2011b. “Regulative Principles and the Wise Author of Nature.” Religious Studies 47(4), 411–29.Google Scholar

Pasternack, Lawrence 2017. “Restoring Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(3), 435–68.Google Scholar

Pasternack, Lawrence 2018. “Kant on Faith: Religious Assent and the Limits to Knowledge.” In Altman, Matthew (ed.), The Palgrave Kant Handbook. London: Palgrave, pp. 962–86.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert 1989. Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Piirimäe, Eva 2017. “State-Machines, Commerce and the Progress of Humanität in Europe: Herder’s Response to Kant in Ideas for the Philosophy of History of Mankind.” In Kapossy, Béla, Nakhimovsky, Isaac, and Whatmore, Richart (eds.), Commerce and Peace in the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–91.Google Scholar

Pollok, Anne 2010. Facetten des Menschen: Zur Anthropologie Moses Mendelssohns. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Pommier, Édouard 1989. “Winckelmann et la vision de l’Antiquité classique dans la France des Lumières et de la Révolution.” Revue de l’art 83, 9–20.Google Scholar

Pommier, Édouard 1991. L’art de la liberté. Doctrines et débats de la Révolution française. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Pozzo, Riccardo 1998. “Kant Within the Tradition of Modern Logic: The Role of the Introduction: Idea of Transcendental Logic.” Review of Metaphysics 52(2), 295–310.Google Scholar

Pross, Wolfgang 2016. “Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit.” In Greif, Stefan, Heinz, Marion, and Clairmont, Heinrich (eds.), Herder Handbuch. Paderborn: Fink, pp. 171–216.Google Scholar

Rauscher, Frederick 2010. “The Positive Role of Reason: Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic and the Doctrine of Method.” In Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 290–309.Google Scholar

Reich, Klaus 2001. Gesammelte Schriften. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Reinhard, Wolfgang 1983. “Zwang zur Konfessionalisierung? Prolegomena zu einer Theorie des konfessionellen Zeitalters.” Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 10, 257–77.Google Scholar

Richter, A. 1876. “Kant als Ästhetiker.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 69, 18–43.Google Scholar

Ritter, Joachim (ed.) 1971–84. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vols. 1–6. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Roehr, Sabine 2003. “Freedom and Autonomy in Schiller.” Journal of the History of Ideas 64(1), 199–34.Google Scholar

Rohls, Michael 2004. Kantisches Naturrecht und historisches Zivilrecht. Wissenschaft und bürgerliche Freiheit bei Gottlieb Hufeland (1760–1817). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Roper, Lyndal 2016. Martin Luther: Renegade and Prophet. London: Random House.Google Scholar

Rossi, Philip J. 2006. “Reading Kant through Theological Spectacles.” In Firestone, Chris L. and Palmquist, Stephen D. (eds.), Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 107–23.Google Scholar

Rückert, Joachim 1991. “Kant-Rezeption in juristischer und politischer Theorie (Naturrecht, Rechtsphilosophie, Staatslehre, Politik) des 19. Jahrhunderts.” In Thompson, Martyn P. (ed.), John Locke und Immanuel Kant: Historische Rezeption und gegenwärtige Relevanz (Historical Reception and Contemporary Relevance). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 144–215.Google Scholar

Ruprecht, Erich 1980. “Herders Gedanken über die Seele und ihre Unsterblichkeit.” In Maltusch, J. G. (ed.), Bückeburger Gespräche über Johann Gottfried Herder 1979. Rinteln: Bösendahl, pp. 31–49.Google Scholar

Sala, S. J., and Giovanni, B. 2004. “Das Reich Gottes auf Erden. Kants Lehre von der Kirche als ‘ethischem gemeinen Wesen’.” In Fischer, Norbert (ed.), Kants Metaphysik und Religionsphilosophie. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 225–64.Google Scholar

Saunders, Joe 2016. “Kant and the Problem of Recognition: Freedom, Transcendental Idealism, and the Third-Person.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24, 164–82.Google Scholar

Schaufele, W. F. 2000. “Die Konsequenzen des Westfälischen Friedens für den Umgang mit religiösen Minderheiten in Deutschland.” In Frank, G. (ed.), Asyl, Toleranz und Religionsfreiheit. Berlin: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 121–39.Google Scholar

Schottky, Richard 1995. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der staatsphilosophischen Vertragstheorie im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Hobbes – Locke – Rousseau – Fichte) mit einem Beitrag zum Problem der Gewaltenteilung bei Rousseau und Fichte (Fichte-Studien-Supplement 6). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Schilson, Arno 2005. “Lessing and Theology.” In Fischer, Barbara and Cox, Thomas (eds.), A Companion to the Works of Gotthold Ephraim Lessing. Rochester, NY: Camden House, pp. 157–83.Google Scholar

Scholz, Günther 1993. “Herder und die Metaphysik.” In Jaeschke, Walter (ed.), Transzendentalphilosophie und Spekulation: der Streit um die Gestalt einer ersten Philosophie (1799–1807). Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar

Schmidt, James 1989. “The Question of Enlightenment: Kant, Mendelssohn, and the Mittwochgesellschaft.” Journal of the History of Ideas 50(2), 269–92.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Jochen 1985. Die Geschichte des Genie-Gedankens 1750–1945, 2 vols. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Schönfeld, Martin 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Pre-Critical Project. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sdun, Winfried 1966. “Zum Begriff des Spiels bei Kant und Schiller.” Kant-Studien 57(4), 500–19.Google Scholar

Siep, Ludwig 1979/2014. Anerkennung als Prinzip der praktischen Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Sikka, Sonia 2011. Herder on Humanity and Cultural Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner 1994. “Kants Amtstätigkeit.” Kant-Studien 85, 470–72.Google Scholar

Stark, Werner 1995. “Kant als akademischer Lehrer.” In Ischreyt, Heinz (ed.), Königsberg und Riga: Zentren der Aufklärung II. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 51–68.Google Scholar

Stefansky, Georg 1923. Das Wesen der deutschen Romantik. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Leslie 2003. “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge.” Kantian Review 7, 72–100.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael 1988. Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland. Erster Band: Reichspublizistik und Policeywissenschaft 1600–1800. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Stolleis, Michael 2002. “Johann Jacob Moser (1701–1785), oder, der Erzpublizist des alten Reichs.” In Gestrich, Andreas and Rainer Lächele, (eds.), Johann Jacob Moser: Politker, Pietist, Publizist. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 58–70.Google Scholar

Stolz, Violetta 2016. “Der Nonsense der Metaphysik.” In Greif, Stefan, Heinz, Marion, and Clairmont, Heinrich (eds.), Herder Handbuch. Paderborn: Fink, pp. 81–104.Google Scholar

Strich, Fritz 1910. Mythologie in der deutschen Literatur von Klopstock bis Wagner. Niemeyer: Halle.Google Scholar

Sweet, Kristi 2013. Kant on Practical Life: From Duty to History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tauber, Zvi 2006. “Aesthetic Education for Morality: Kant and Schiller.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 40(3), 22–47.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles 1985. “Atomism.” In Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Gutmann, Amy (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–74.Google Scholar

Thompson, Evan 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Unger, Rudolf 1911. Hamann und die Aufklärung. Studien zur Vorgeschichte des romantischen Geistes im achtzehnten Jahrhundert, 1st edn. Jena: Diederichs.Google Scholar

Unger, Rudolf 1922. Herder, Novalis und Kleist. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.Google Scholar

Unger, Rudolf 1924. “Zur Geschichte des Palingenesiegedankens im 18. Jahrhundert.” Deutsche Vierteljahresschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 1, 257–74.Google Scholar

Van Kirk, Carol 1986. “Kant and the Problem of Other Minds.” Kant-Studien 77, 41–58.Google Scholar

Waldow, Anik 2017. “Between History and Nature: Herder’s Human Being and the Naturalization of Reason.” In Waldow, Anik and DeSouza, Nigel (eds.), Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–65.Google Scholar

Waldow, Anik, and DeSouza, Nigel (eds.) 2017. Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, Mack 1981. Johann Jakob Moser and the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Ware, Owen 2009. “Fichte’s Voluntarism.” European Journal of Philosophy 18, 262–82.Google Scholar

Weber, Hans Emil 1917. “Zwei Propheten des Irrationalismus: J. G. Hamann und S. Kierkegaard als Bahnbrecher der Theologie des Christusglaubens.” Neue kirchliche Zeitschrift 38, 23–55, 77–125.Google Scholar

Weber, Heinrich 1904. Hamann und Kant: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Philosophie im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. München: Beck.Google Scholar

Wendehorst, Stephan 2015a. “Altes Reich, ‘Alte Reiche’ und der imperial turn in der Geschichtswissenschaft.” In Wendehorst, Stephan (ed.), Die Anatomie frühneuzeitlicher Imperien: Herrschaftsmanagement jenseits von Staat und Nation. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 17–60.Google Scholar

Wendehorst, Stephan 2015b. Die Anatomie frühneuzeitlicher Imperien: Herrschaftsmanagement jenseits von Staat und Nation. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Whaley, Joachim 2000. “A Tolerant Society? Religious Toleration in the Holy Roman Empire, 1648–1806.” In Grell, Ole Peter and Porter, Roy (eds.), Toleration in Enlightenment Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175–95.Google Scholar

Whaley, Joachim 2012a. Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, vol. I: Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia, 1490–1648. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Whaley, Joachim 2012b. Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, vol. II: The Peace of Westphalia to the Dissolution of the Reich, 1648–1806. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wildt, Andreas 1982. Autonomie und Anerkennung: Hegels Moralkritik Im Lichte Seiner Fichte-Rezeption. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Elizabeth, and Willoughby, L. A. 1967. On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Willaschek, Marcus 2009. “Right and Coercion: Can Kant’s Conception of Right Be Derived from his Moral Theory?” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17(2), 49–70.Google Scholar

Williams, Robert 1992. Recognition: Fichte and Hegel on the Other. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Wohlfart, Günter 1984. “Hamanns Kantkritik.” Kant-Studien 75(4), 398–419.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen 1970. Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen 2006. “The Good Without Limitation.” In Horn, Christoph and Schonecker, Dieter (eds.), Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. New York, NY: de Gruyter, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen 2009. “Herder and Kant on History: Their Enlightenment Faith.” In Newlands, Samuel and Jorgensen, Larry M. (eds.), Metaphysics and the Good: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 313–42.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen 2016. “Deduction of the Summons and the Existence of Other Rational Beings.” In Gottlieb, Gabriel (ed.), Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 72–91.Google Scholar

Zammito, John 1992. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Zammito, John 2002. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Zeumer, Karl (ed.) 1913. Quellensammlung zur Geschichte der Deutschen Reichsverfassung in Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Zylberman, Ariel 2017. “Two Second‐Personal Conceptions of the Dignity of Persons.” European Journal of Philosophy (http://doi: 10.1111/ejop.12210).Google Scholar