Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-vkn6t Total loading time: 0.836 Render date: 2022-08-12T10:28:49.866Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

2 - The Rise of the Jury in Argentina

Evolution in Real Time

from Part I - Advances in Lay Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2021

Sanja Kutnjak Ivković
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Shari Seidman Diamond
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Valerie P. Hans
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Nancy S. Marder
Affiliation:
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the rise of the Argentine jury. Although promised in the 1853 National Constitution, the jury did not come to Argentina until the provinces took the lead in the twenty-first century. Responding to public distrust in the legal system, scholars and reformers saw the jury as a way to bring transparency, efficiency, and democratization to a judicial system rooted in the inquisitorial tradition. The chapter looks at the various choices each province has made in designing its jury trials and the distinctive features of equal gender representation and an indigenous jury introduced in Argentina. Although the reformers who advocated juries faced opposition, they overcame resistance, and appellate courts have rejected challenges to the new jury systems. Moreover, early research reveals positive reactions from the jurors, judges, and attorneys who have participated in jury trials in Neuquén and the province of Buenos Aires, and new provinces have been joining the move to implement jury systems. Other countries in Latin America have expressed interest in Argentina’s jury activities. Further developments will bear watching.

Type
Chapter
Information
Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
A Global Perspective
, pp. 25 - 46
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, V., Bakrokar, D., & Bilinski, M. (2016, June). From civil law to common law in Argentina: The jury´s great potential to put an end to the Inquisition’s culture [Paper presentation]. Law and Society Association meeting, New Orleans, USA.Google Scholar
Asociación Argentina de Juicio por Jurados [Argentina Association of Trial by Jury]. (2018). Mendoza: Multitudinaria conferencia y simulacro de juicio por jurados [Mendoza: Multitudinous conference and mock jury trial]. www.juicioporjurados.org/2018/08/mendoza-multitudinaria-conferencia-y.htmlGoogle Scholar
Asociación Argentina de Juicio por Jurados(2019). Mendoza: Absolvieron a la mujer que mató a su marido en Godoy Cruz [Mendoza: The woman accused of murdering her husband was acquitted in Godoy Cruz]. www.juicioporjurados.org/2019/05/mendoza-absolvieron-la-mujer-que-mato.html#moreGoogle Scholar
Asociación Argentina de Juicio por Jurados (2020). Argentina’s President Alberto Fernández announced that the federal jury bill will be sent to the Congress for its approval. www.juicioporjurados.org/2020/03/argentinas-president-alberto-fernandez.htmlGoogle Scholar
Binder, A. M. (2012). La implementación de la nueva justicia penal adversarial [The implementation of the new adversarial criminal justice]. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Binder, A. M. (2015). Contra la inquisición: Notas y ensayos breves sobre la justicia penal [Against the inquisition: Notes and short essays about criminal justice]. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Binder, A. M., & Harfuch, A. (2016). El juicio por jurados en la jurisprudencia nacional e internacional: Sentencias comentadas y opiniones académicas del common law, del civil law y de la Corte Europea de Derechos Humanos [Trial by jury in the national and international jurisprudence: Commented rulings and scholarly opinions from the common law, the civil law, and the European Court of Human Rights]. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Bruzzone, G. (2000). El juicio por jurado en el proceso penal [Trial by jury in a criminal proceeding]. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Cafferata Nores, J. (2012). Manual de derecho procesal penal [Handbook of criminal procedural law]. Córdoba, Argentina: Advocatus.Google Scholar
Canales, Mariano Eduardo y otros, Corte Suprema de Justicia, 461/2016/RH1 (2019).Google Scholar
Carvajal, D. A. y otros s/homicidio doblemente calificado, Tribunal Penal de Impugnación Penal de Neuquén (2015). http://181.168.124.69:81/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=135Google Scholar
Chayer, J., Spector, H., & Zacchino, P. (2010). Index of trust in justice. www.scribd.com/document/50547049/indice-2010-di-tellaGoogle Scholar
Chizik, N. (2018, June). The aboriginal jury in Argentina and the possibility of a “grafting-transplant” [Paper presentation]. Law and Society Association meeting, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Código Procesal Penal de la Nación Argentina [Code of Criminal Procedure of the Argentine Nation] (1991). http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/0-4999/383/texact.htmGoogle Scholar
Código Procesal Penal de la Provincia de Buenos Aires [Code of Criminal Procedure of the Province of Buenos Aires (Arg.)], Act 14.543 (2013).Google Scholar
Código Procesal Penal de la Provincia de Río Negro [Code of Criminal Procedure of the Province of Río Negro (Arg.)], Act 5020 (2014); (amended 2019).Google Scholar
Código Procesal Penal de la Provincia de San Juan [Code of Criminal Procedure of the Province of San Juan (Arg.)], Act 1851 (2018).Google Scholar
Coelho, J. M. (2016). First verdict “not guilty” of San Isidro: Interview with Judge María Coelho. www.juicioporjurados.org/2016/03/no-culpable-en-san-isidro-entrevista-la.htmlGoogle Scholar
Constable, M. (1994). The law of the other: The mixed jury and changing conceptions of citizenship, law and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Constitución de la Nación Argentina [National Constitution of Argentina] (1994). http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/0-4999/804/norma.htmGoogle Scholar
Damaška, M. R. (1986). The faces of justice and state authority: A comparative approach to the legal process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dann, B. M., & Logan, G. (1996). Jury reform: The Arizona experience. Judicature, 79, 280286.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S. (2016). Las múltiples dimensiones del juicio por jurados: Estudios sobre el comportamiento del jurado: Jurado penal y jurado civil [The many dimensions of trial by jury: Studies of jury behavior. Criminal and civil jury trials]. Buenos Aires: Ad-Hoc Publishers.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S., & Hans, V. P. (2019, May). Gender on the Argentine jury [Paper presentation]. Law and Society Association meeting, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S., Porterie, S., & Romano, A. (2018, June). The power of the jury: Discovering the jury trial in the province of Buenos Aires [Paper presentation]. Law and Society Association meeting, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S., Rose, M. R., & Murphy, B. (2006). Revisiting the unanimity requirement: The behavior of the non-unanimous civil jury. Northwestern University Law Review, 100, 201230.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, T, Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Waters, N. L., Munsterman, G. T., Schwab, S. J., & Wells, M. T. (2005). Judge-jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven and Zeisel’s The American jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2, 171207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elhart, R. (2017, June). Juicio por jurados: El otro paradigma [Trial by jury: The other paradigm]. Pensamiento Penal LJ, pp. 1–2. www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2017/06/doctrina45389.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Mott, N. L., & Munsterman, G .T. (2002). Are hung juries a problem? www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_Juries_HungJuriesPub.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hans, V. P. (2014). ¿Cuál es la diferencia que hace un jurado? [What difference does a jury make?] In Hans & Gastil, 2014 (pp. 2145).Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., & Gastil, J. (Eds.). (2014). El juicio por jurados: Investigaciones sobre la deliberacíon, el veredicto y la democracia [Trial by jury: Studies on deliberation, verdict, and democracy]. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., Porterie, S., & Romano, A. (2018, June). A new jury system at work [Paper presentation]. Law and Society Association meeting, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Harfuch, A. (2013). El juicio por jurados en la provincia de Buenos Aires: Ley provincial 14.543 anotada y comentada. El modelo de jurado clásico [Trial by jury in the province of Buenos Aires: Notes on the provincial law 14.543. The classic jury model]. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Harfuch, A. (2014). El jurado clásico: Manual modelo de instrucciones al jurado. Ley modelo de juicio por jurados [The classic jury: Handbook guide for jury instructions. Trial by jury model law]. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Harfuch, A. (2015). La firmeza (finalidad) del veredicto del jurado [The finality of the jury’s verdict]. In Letner, G & Piñeyro, L (Eds.), II congreso internacional de juicio por jurados [Second international conference of trial by jury] (pp. 85112). Buenos Aires: Jusbaires.Google Scholar
Harfuch, A. (2018, June). The status of trial by jury in Latin America [Paper presentation]. Law and Society Association meeting, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Harfuch, A. (2019a, May). The Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruling and the expansion of the jury in Argentina and Latin America [Paper presentation]. Law and Society Association meeting, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Harfuch, A. (2019b). El veredicto del jurado [The verdict of the jury]. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Harfuch, A., Bilinski, M., & Ortiz, A. (2017). El jurado indigena en Argentina [The indigenous jury in Argentina]. In Letner, G & Piñeyro, L (Eds.), Juicio por jurados en el procedimiento penal [Trial by jury in a criminal procedure] (pp. 2532). Buenos Aires: Jusbaires.Google Scholar
Hendler, E. S. (2001–2002). Lay participation in the judicial process: The situation in Argentina. Saint Louis–Warsaw Transatlantic Law Journal, 2001–2002, 8188.Google Scholar
Hendler, E. S. (2008). Lay participation in Argentina: Old history, recent experience. Southwestern Journal of International Law, 15, 129.Google Scholar
Herrmann, S., MacDonald, D., Tauscher, R., & Layton, M. L. (2011). Perspectivas desde el barómetro de las américas: 2011. Confianza en el sistema de justicia penal de las Américas, Nº62 [Prospects from America’s barometer: 2011. Confidence in America’s criminal justice system, No. 62]. www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/I0862es2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kalven, H., Jr., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Kovalev, N. (2010). Criminal justice reform in Russia, Ukraine and the Former Republics of the Soviet Union: Trial by jury and mixed courts. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Las reformas clave que Suárez impulsara en la Justicia [The key justice reforms that Suárez will push]. (2020). El Sol. www.elsol.com.ar/las-reformas-clave-que-suarez-impulsara-en-la-justiciaGoogle Scholar
Latinobarómetro [Latinobarometer]. (1995–2015, excluding 2012 and 1999). www.latinobarometro.org/lat.jspGoogle Scholar
Ley de Juicio por Jurados de Chaco [Jury Trial Law of Chaco (Arg.)], Act 7661 (2015).Google Scholar
Ley de Juicio por Jurados de Chubut [Jury Trial Law of Chubut (Arg.)], Act XV No. 30, Decree No. 78 (2019).Google Scholar
Ley de Juicio por Jurados de Entre Ríos [Jury Trial Law of Entre Ríos (Arg.)], Act 10.746 (2019).Google Scholar
Ley de Juicio por Jurados de Mendoza [Jury Trial Law of Mendoza (Arg.)], Act 9106 (2018).Google Scholar
Ley de Juicio por Jurados de Neuquén [Jury Trial Law of Neuquén (Arg.)], Act 2784 (2011).Google Scholar
Lopez, Mauro Gabriel s/recurso de Queja interpuesto por Agente Fiscal, Tribunal de Casación Penal de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. (2016). www.defensapublica.org.ar/JURISDICCIONAL/Jurisprudencia/tribunal_de_casacion/Fallos_por_temas/Juicio_x_Jurados/Recurso_Fiscal_Juicio_x_Jurados.pdfGoogle Scholar
MacCoun, R. J., & Tyler, T. (1988). The basis of citizens’ perceptions of the criminal jury: Procedural fairness, accuracy, and efficiency. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 333352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, J. B. J. (2004). Derecho procesal penal tomo II, encuadernados [Procedural criminal law, Vol. 2, bound]. San Juan: University of Puerto Rico Press.Google Scholar
Ministerio Público de la Defensa [Public Ministry of Defense (Arg.)]. (2015, June 9). Diez: “El juicio por jurados es una garantía del imputado” [Diez: “Trial by jury is a right for the defendant”]. www.mpdneuquen.gob.ar/index.php/2-sin-clasificar/302-diez-el-juicio-por-jurados-es-una-garantia-del-imputadoGoogle Scholar
New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262 (1923).Google Scholar
Observatorio Permanente de Juicios por Jurados de la Universidad Nacional del Sur [Permanent Observatory of Jury Trials of Universidad Nacional del Sur]. (2016). Juicio por jurados. Informe. [Trial by jury. Report.] Editorial de la Universidad Nacional del Sur. Ediuns.Google Scholar
Porterie, S., & Romano, A. (2016). Juries and democratic legitimacy: The jury trial in the public debate in Argentina. www.academia.edu/32284058/Google Scholar
Porterie, S., & Romano, A. (2018). El poder del jurado: Descubriendo el juicio por jurados en la Provincia de Buenos Aires [The power of the jury: Discovering trial by jury in the province of Buenos Aires]. Buenos Aires: INECIP.Google Scholar
Protocolo de Actuación en Juicios con Jurados Populares: Acuerdo 260, Serie “A,” Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Provincia de Córdoba [Protocol with guidelines on trial by jury: Agreement 260, “A” Series, Superior Court of Justice of the Province of Córdoba (Arg.)] (2017, May 8).Google Scholar
Louisiana, Ramos v., 140 S. Ct. 1390 (2020).Google Scholar
Rose, M. R., Ellison, C., & Diamond, S. S. (2010). Judges and juries in the public’s mind. Judicature, 93, 194200.Google Scholar
Sociedad: El pueblo, más sabio que los abogados [Society: The people, wiser than the attorneys]. (2015, November 5). Página/12. www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/sociedad/3-285450-2015-11-05.htmlGoogle Scholar
Thaman, S. C. (1999). Europe’s new jury systems: The cases of Spain and Russia. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62, 233259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VRP, VPC, and others v. Nicaragua, Inter-American Court of Human Rights (ser. C) No. 350 (2018, March 8).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×