Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-45s75 Total loading time: 0.624 Render date: 2021-11-29T15:09:03.826Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2021

Simon Truwant
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting Cassirer
Critical Essays
, pp. 237 - 246
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adriaenssen, Han Thomas. 2017. Representation and Scepticism from Aquinas to Descartes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. The Time That Remains, tr. by Dailey, Patricia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 2017. “The Sacrament of Language.” In The Omnibus Homo Sacer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Anders, Günther. 2010. Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Andersch, Norbert. 2007. “Symbolische Form und Gestalt – Ein kreatives Spannungsverhältnis.” Gestalt Theory 29: 279293.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. “Peri hermeneias.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. by Barnes, J., vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 538.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1993. De Anima, tr. by Hamlyn, D. W.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ash, Mitchell G. 1995. Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bast, Rainer A. 2000. Problem, Geschichte, Form: Das Verhältnis von Philosophie und Geschichte bei Ernst Cassirer im historischen Kontext. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Bayer, Thora Ilin. 2004. “History As Symbolic Form: Cassirer and Vico.Idealistic Studies 34(1): 4965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Thora Ilin. 2006. “Art As Symbolic Form: Cassirer on the Educational Value of Art.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 40(4): 5164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beller, Mara. 1999. Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1912. An Introduction to Metaphysics (1903), tr. by Hulme, T. E.. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. 1964. “A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710).” In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, ed. by Luce, A. A. and Jessop, T. E., vol. 2. London: Nelson, 1113.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. 2010. Theorie der Lebenswelt. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bohr, Niels. 1928. “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory.” Nature 121: 580590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokulich, Alisa. 2004. “Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation between Classical and Mechanics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35: 377396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokulich, Alisa. 2008. “Paul Dirac and the Einstein-Bohr Debate.” Perspectives on Science 16: 103114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bösch, Michael. 2002. “Symbolische Prägnanz und passive Synthesis. Genetische Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung bei Cassirer und Husserl.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 109: 148161.Google Scholar
Bottici, Chiara. 2017. “Who Is Afraid of the Myth of the State? Remarks on Cassirer’s Unpublished Manuscript.” In Social Imaginaries 3.2: Approaches to Religion, 213–227.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 2019. Heroism and Magnanimity: The Post-Modern Form of Self-Conscious Agency. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst. 2005. “‘4 Stunden Fahrt. 4 Stunden Rede’. Aby Warburg Besucht Albert Einstein.” In Einstein on the Beach. Der Physiker als Phänomen, ed. by Hagner, Michael. Frankfurt: Fischer, 165182.Google Scholar
Bredekamp, Horst, and Wedepohl, Claudia. 2015. Warburg, Cassirer und Einstein im Gespräch. Kepler als Schlüssel der Moderne. Berlin: Wagenbach.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1973. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (1874), ed. by Kraus, O., vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brey, Philip. 2000. “Technology As Extension of Human Faculties.” In Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology, ed. by Mitcham, C., vol. 19. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brüntrup, Godehard, and Jaskolla, Ludwig (eds.). 2016. Panpsychism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capeillères, Fabien. 1995. “Cassirer and Political Philosophy.” In Kulturkritik nach Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Rudolph, Enno and Küppers, Bernd-Olaf, Cassirer-Forschungen, vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner, 129142.Google Scholar
Capeillères, Fabien. 2008. “History and Philosophy in Ernst Cassirer’s System of Symbolic Forms.” In The Construction of Symbolic Reality: The Legacy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Andrew Barash, Jeffrey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 4072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1929. Archives for Scientific Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh Libraries, ASP RC 025-73-03, March 30, 1929.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Toni. 1981. Mein Leben mit Ernst Cassirer. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David. 2016. “Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism.” In Panpsychism, ed. by Brüntrup, G. and Jaskolla, L.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. 1984. Werke, ed. by Hermann-Cohen-Archiv, , vol. 5. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. 1987. Werke, ed. by Hermann-Cohen-Archiv, , vol. I/3. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1994. The Idea of History, ed. by van der Dussen, Jan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, James. 2016. “Why Kant Is Not a Kantian.” Philosophical Topics 44: 75125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla, and Panfilio, Kenneth Michael. 2010. Symbolic Forms for a New Humanity: Cultural and Racial Reconfigurations of Critical Theory. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das Literarische Echo 9: Halbmonatschrift für Literaturfreunde. Oktober 1906–Oktober 1907.Google Scholar
de la Madrid, Rafael. 2005. “The Role of the Rigged Hilbert Space in Quantum Mechanics.” European Journal of Physics 26(2).Google Scholar
de Warren, Nicolas. 2015. “Eine Reise um die Welt: Cassirer’s Cosmological Phenomenology.” In New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism, ed. by de Warren, Nicolas, and Staiti, Andrea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac, Paul. 1930. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dirac, Paul. 1939. “A New Notation for Quantum Mechanics.” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 35: 416418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duhem, Pierre. 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilenberg, Wolfram. 2018. Zeit der Zauberer. Das große Jahrzehnt der Philosophie 1919–1929. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1991. Mein Weltbild, ed. by Seelig, Carl, Frankfurt am Main/Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Englert, Ludwig. 1962. “Als Student bei den zweiten Davoser Hochschulkursen.” In Nachlese zu Heidegger: Dokumente zu seinem Leben und Denken, hrsg. von Guido Schneeberger, Bern: Private Edition.Google Scholar
Feilchenfeldt, Rahel. 2003. “Leo Kestenberg im Kreis von Paul Cassirer und seinen Künstlern.” In Ernst Barlach und die klassische Moderne im Kunstsallon und Verlag Paul Cassirer, ed. by Thieme, Helga and Probst, Volker. Berlin: Exhib. cat. Güstrow, 6980.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Massimo. 1988. Il giovane Cassirer e la scuola di Marburgo. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Massimo. 2003. Ernst Cassirer. Stationen einer philosophischen Biographie, Hamburg: Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarin, Alfredo. 2000. “Homo Faber, Homo Sapiens, or Homo Politicus? Protagoras and the Myth of Prometheus.” Review of Metaphysics 54(2): 289319.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. 1843. Grundsätze der Philosophie der Zukunft. Zürich: Verlag des literarischen Comptoirs.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1967a. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” In Gottlob Frege, Kleine Schriften, ed. by Angelelli, Ignacio. Hildesheim: Olms, 143162.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1967b. “Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Teil: Der Gedanke.” In Gottlob Frege, Kleine Schriften, ed. by Angelelli, Ignacio. Hildesheim: Olms, 342362.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2000. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2001. The Dynamics of Reason. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Gage, John. 1993. Colour and Culture: Practice and Meaning form Antiquity to Abstraction. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Gaubert, Joël. 1996. La science politique d'Ernst Cassirer. Pour une refondation symbolique de la raison pratique contre le mythe politique contemporaine. Paris: Editions Kimé.Google Scholar
Gawronsky, Dimitry. 1949. “Ernst Cassirer: His Life and Works.” In The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Schilpp, Paul A., Library of Living Philosophers 6. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 337.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Arnold. 1980. Man in the Age of Technology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Geiger, Lazarus. 1872. Ursprung und Entwickelung der menschlichen Sprache und Vernunft. Stuttgart: Verlag J. G. Cotta.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1988. “Technology and Magic.” Anthropology Today 4(2): 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardt, Volker. 1988. “Vernunft aus Geschichte: Ernst Cassirers systematischer Beitrag zu einer Philosophie der Politik.” In Über Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, ed. by Braun, H.-J., Holzhey, H., Orth, E. W. (hrsg.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 220247.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johan Wolfgang. 1824. “Das Sehen in subjectiver Hinsicht, von Purkinje, 1819. Goethe, Sämtliche Werke Abt. II, Bd. XI: 269284.Google Scholar
Göller, Thomas. 1991. “Ernst Cassirer über Geschichte und Geschichtswissenschaft.” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 45(2): 224248.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter E. 2010. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael. 2020. “History, Freedom, and Normativity in Cassirer.” In Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: The Method of Culture, ed. by Filieri, In Luigi and Pollok, Anne (hrsg.). Pisa: Edizioni ETS (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Gross, Bertram M. 1964. The Managing of Organizations: The Administrative Struggle. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1997. “Die befreiende Kraft der Symbolischen Formgebung.” In Ernst Cassirers Werk und Wirkung. Kultur und Philosophie, ed. by Frede, Dorothea und Schmücker, Reinhold (hrsg.). Darmstadt, 79104.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. “Der Deutsche Idealismus der jüdischen Philosophie.” In Philosophisch-politische Profile. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 3964.Google Scholar
Halvorson, Hans. 2019. “To Be a Realist about Quantum Theory.” In Quantum Worlds: Perspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, ed. by Lombardi, Qlimpia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 133163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamacher-Hermes, Adelheid. 1994. Inhalts- oder Umfangslogik? Die Kontroverse zwischen E. Husserl und A.H. Voigt. Freiburg/München: Alber Verlag.Google Scholar
Hartimo, Mirja. 2007. “Toward Completeness: Husserl on Theories of Manifolds, 1890–1901.” Synthese 156: 281310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1927. Sein und Zeit. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1989. Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis) (1936-1938). Hrsg. von F.-W. von Herrmann. Ein Heidegger Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1997. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, tr. by Taft, Richard. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2013. Nature, State, History: 1933–1934, tr. by Fried, Gregory and Polt, Richard. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hering, Ewald. 1920. Grundzüge der Lehre vom Lichtsinn. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, David. 2004. David Hilbert’s Lectures on the Foundations of Geometry 1891-1902, ed. Hallett, Michael and Majer, Ulrich. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hitler, Adolf. 1939. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler 1, ed. by Baynes, Norman H.. New York: Gordon Press.Google Scholar
Hoel, Aud Sissel. 2012. “Technics of Thinking.” In Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology, ed. by Hoel, Aud Sissel and Folkvord, Ingvild. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 6591.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1890–1910. Aufsätze und Rezensionen. Hrsg. von Bernhard Rang. Husserliana XXII. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1900–1901. Logische Untersuchungen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1929. Formale und transzendentale Logik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1950. Cartesianische Meditationen. Hrsg. von Stephan Strasser, Husserliana I. Den, Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1954. Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologischen Philosophie. Hrsg. von Walter Biemel, Husserliana VI. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of the European Sciences, tr. by Carr, David. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Ding und Raum: Vorlesungen 1907. Hrsg. von Ulrich Claesges, Husserliana XVI. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch. Hrsg. von Karl Schuhmann, Husserliana III. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1979. Aufsätze und Rezensionen (1890–1910). Hrsg. von Bernhard Rang, Husserliana Band XXII. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1980. Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwartigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898-1925). Hrsg. von Eduard Marbach, Husserliana XXIII. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1994. Briefwechsel. Die Neukantianer. Hrsg. von E. Schuhmann und K. Schuhmann, Husserliana Dokumente, vol. III/V. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, Karl. 1990. “Letter [to Heidegger] 24, July 21, 1925.” In Briefwechsel, 1920–1963, hrsg. von Walter Biemel und Hans Saner. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 5152.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason (1781/87), tr. by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2004. “The Jäsche logic.” In Lectures on Logic, ed. by Young, J. Michael, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapp, Ernst. 2015. Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Kultur aus neuen Gesichtspunkten (1877). Hrsg. von Harun Maye und Leander Scholz, Hamburg, Meiner.Google Scholar
Kestenberg, Leo (hrsg.). 1930. Kunst und Technik. Berlin: Volksverband der Bücherfreunde Wegweiser-Verlag.Google Scholar
Klages, Ludwig. 1920. Mensch und Erde. Munich: Müller.Google Scholar
Klemperer, Victor. 2006. The Language of the Third Reich: LTI–Lingue Tertii Imperii. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Knizhnik, Olga. 2020. “History between Art and Science: Cassirer as Historian of Philosophy.” In Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: The Method of Culture, Filieri, Luigi and Pollok, Anne (hrsg.). Pisa: Edizioni ETS (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Knobloch, Clemens. 1988. Geschichte der psychologischen Sprachauffassung in Deutschland von 1850 bis 1920. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang. 1920. Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand. Braunschweig: Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp-Oberstebrink, Herbert. 2012. “Konstellationen und Kontexte: Formen von Philosophie- geschichtsschreibung in Ernst Cassirers Philosophie.” In Philosophie der Kultur – Kultur des Philosophierens: Ernst Cassirer im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert, ed. by Recki, Birgit. Hamburg: Meiner, 255276.Google Scholar
Kreis, Guido. 2010. Cassirer und die Formen des Geistes. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kreis, Guido. 2015. “The Varieties of Perception: Nonconceptual Content in Kant, Cassirer, and McDowell.” In The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: A Novel Assessment, ed. by Friedman, J. Tyler and Luft, Sebastian. Berlin: De Gruyter, 313338.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 1987. Ernst Cassirer: Symbolic Forms and History. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 1988. “Problematik, Eigenart und Aktualität der Cassirerschen Philosophie der symbolischen Formen.” In Über Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, ed. by Braun, H.-J., Holzhey, H., and Orth, E. W.. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1544.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 1999. “Cassirer’s ‘Prototype and Model’ of Symbolism.” Science in Context 12: 531547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 2011. “The Priority of ‘Symbolism’ over Language in Cassirer’s Philosophy.” Synthese 179: 920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 2012a. “Cassirer’s Revision of the Enlightenment Project.” In Philosophie der Kultur – Kultur des Philosophierens: Ernst Cassirer im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert, ed. by Recki, Birgit. Hamburg: Meiner, 89105.Google Scholar
Krois, John Michael. 2012b. “The Age of Complete Mechanization.” In Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology, ed. by Hoel, Aud Sissel and Folkvord, Ingvild. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 5461.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 2005. Psychologism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel and Poiré, François. 1996. Essai et entretiens. Paris: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
Lofts, Steve G. 2000. Ernst Cassirer: A “Repetition” of Modernity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian. 2005. “Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Between Reason and Relativism; a Critical Appraisal.” Idealistic Studies 34(1): 2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, Sebastian. 2011. Subjectivity and Lifeworld in Transcendental Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Luft, Sebastian. 2015a. The Space of Culture: Towards a Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Culture (Cohen, Natorp, and Cassirer). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luft, Sebastian. 2015b. “The Philosophy of the Marburg School: From the Critique of Scientific Reason to the Philosophy of Culture.” In New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism, ed. by De Warren, Nicolas and Staiti, Andrea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matherne, Samantha. 2015. “Marburg Neo-Kantianism as Philosophy of Culture.” In The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: A Novel Assessment, ed. by Friedman, J. Tyler and Luft, Sebastian. Berlin: De Gruyter, 201231.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Lee. 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Robert, and Doerr, Karin. 2002. Nazi-Deutsch/Nazi German: an English Lexicon of the Language of the Third Reich. Westport: Greenwood Pub Group, Inc.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1878. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.Google Scholar
Möckel, Christian. 1992. “Symbolische Prägnanz – ein phänomenologischer Begriff? Zum Verhältnis Cassirers Philosophie der symbolischen Formen und Edmund Husserls Phänomenologie.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 40(9): 10501063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möckel, Christian. 2001. “Die anschauliche Natur des ideierend abstrahierten Allgemeinen. Eine Kontroverse zwischen Edmund Husserl und Ernst Cassirer.” Phänomenologische Forschungen 1(2): 233258.Google Scholar
Möckel, Christian. 2005 . Das Urphänomen des Lebens. Ernst Cassirers Lebensbegriff. Hamburg: Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möckel, Christian. 2018. Die Philosophie Ernst Cassirers. Vom Ausdrucks-und Symbolcharacter kultureller Lebensformen. Hamburg: Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Walter J. 1989. Schrödinger. Life and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, Gregory. 2014. Ernst Cassirer and the Autonomy of Language. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Moynahan, Gregory B. 2013. Ernst Cassirer and the Critical Science of Germany 1899-1919. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 1882. Descartes’ Erkenntnistheorie. Eine Studie zur Vorgeschichte des Kriticismus. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 1965. Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritischer Methode. Erstes Buch: Objekt und Methode der Psychologie (1912). Amsterdam: Bonset.Google Scholar
Natorp, Paul. 2015. “Kant and the Marburg School.” In The Neo-Kantian Reader, ed. by Luft, Sesbastian. London and New York: Routledge, 180197.Google Scholar
Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psyschology 2(2), 175220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noiré, Ludwig. 1877. Der Ursprung der Sprache. Mainz: Verlag von Victor v. Zabern.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Orth, Ernst Wolfgang. 1988. “Zugänge zu Ernst Cassirer: Eine Einleitung.” In Über Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, ed. by Braun, H.-J., Holzhey, H., and Orth, E. W.. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 711.Google Scholar
Orth, Ernst Wolfgang. 2004. Von der Erkenntnistheorie zur Kulturphilosophie: Studien zu Ernst Cassirers Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Pillot de Chenecy, Sean. 2018. The Post-Truth Business: How to Rebuild Brand Authenticity in a Distrusting World. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Plato, , 1997. “Laws.” In Plato Complete Works, ed. by Cooper, John. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Martina. 1997. “Gestaltpsychologie und Wahrnehmungstheorie bei Ernst Cassirer.” In Von der Philosophie zur Wissenschaft, ed. by. Rudoph, Enno und Stamatescu, Ion O. (hrsg.). Hamburg: Meiner, 171207.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Martina. 2004. Wahrnehmung, Repräsentation und Wissen: Edmund Husserls und Ernst Cassirers Analysen zur Struktur des Bewusstseins. Berlin: Parerga.Google Scholar
Poggi, Stefano. 1995. “Cassirers Auseinandersetzung mit dem gestaltpsychologischen Ansatz.” In Kulturkritik nach Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Rudolph, Enno und Küppers, Bernd O. (hrsg.). Hamburg: Meiner, 237243.Google Scholar
Pollok, Anne. 2010. Facetten des Menschen. Zu Moses Mendelssohns Anthropologie. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Pollok, Anne. 2015. “The First and Second Person Perspective in History. Or: Why History is ‘Culture Fiction.’” In The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: A Novel Assessment, ed. by Friedman, J. Tyler and Luft, Sebastian (eds.). Berlin: De Gruyter, 341360.Google Scholar
Pollok, Anne. 2016. “Significant Formation: An Intersubjective Approach to Aesthetic Experience in Cassirer and Langer.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 37(1): 7195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin-Havt, Ari, and Matters, Media. 2016. Lies Incorporated: The World of Post-Truth Politics. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Recki, Birgit. 2000. “Tragödie der Kultur oder Dialektische Struktur des Kulturbewußtseins? Der ethische Kern der Kontroverse zwischen Simmel und Cassirer.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 2: 157175.Google Scholar
Recki, Birgit. 2004. “Freiheit und Werk. Über handlungstheoretische Kategorien der kulturphilosophischen Grundlegung bei Ernst Cassirer.” In Merz-Benz, Peter U. and Renz, Ursula (eds.), Ethik oder Ästhetik? Zur Aktualität der neukantianischen Kulturphilosophie. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 115134.Google Scholar
Recki, Birgit. 2012. Philosophie der Kultur – Kultur des Philosophierens: Ernst Cassirer im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert. Hamburg: Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, David. 1993. Hand’s End. Technology and the Limits of Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Enno. 2008. “Symbol and History: Ernst Cassirer’s Critique of the Philosophy of History.” In The Symbolic Construction of Reality: The Legacy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. by Barash, Jeffrey Andrew. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüger, Alexander. 1987. “Atomism from Cosmology: Erwin Schrödinger’s Work on Wave Mechanics and Space-Time Structure.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 18: 377401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1921. The Analysis of Mind. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ryckman, Thomas. 1991. “Conditio sine qua non: Zuordnung in the Early Epistemologies of Cassirer and Schlick.” Synthese 88: 5795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryckman, Thomas. 2018. “Cassirer and Dirac on the Symbolic Method in Quantum Mechanics: A Confluence of Opposites.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 6: 193224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalow, Frank, and Velkley, Richard (eds.). 2014. The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought: Historical and Critical Essays. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheerer, Eckart et al. 1992. “Repräsentation.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, ed. by Ritter, Joachim and Gründer, Karlfried, vol. 8. Basel: Schwabe & Co., 790853.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 2009. The Human Place in the Cosmos, tr. by Frings, Manfred S., Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. 2007. Historical-critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Mythology, tr. by Richey, Mason and Zisselsberger, Markus. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
Schubbach, Arno. 2016. Die Genese des Symbolischen. Zu den Anfängen von Ernst Cassirers Kulturphilosophie. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert. 1987. The Philosophy of Civilization, tr. by Campion, C.T., New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Sieg, Ulrich. 1994. Aufstieg und Niedergang des Marburger Neukantianismus. Die Geschichte einer philosophischen Schulgemeinschaft. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, Edward. 2003. “From Epistemology to Cultural Criticism: Georg Simmel and Ernst Cassirer.” History of European Ideas 29: 365381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skidelsky, Edward. 2008. Ernst Cassirer: The Last Philosopher of Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiti, Andrea. 2016. “Lotze and Husserl on First and Second Generality.” Discipline Filosofiche 26(1): 4766.Google Scholar
Steiner, George. 1986. “The Hollow Miracle.” In Language and Silence: Essays on Language, Literature, and the Inhuman. Atheneum: New York, 96.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1959. “Kurt Riezler (1882–1955).” In What is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies, Glencoe: The Free Press, 245246.Google Scholar
Tahko, Tuomas E. 2016. An Introduction to Metametaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomé, Horst. 2000. “Zur Psychologie des Erfinders in Max Eyths Der Schneider von Ulm.” In Modernisierung und Literatur: Festschrift für Hans Ulrich Seeber zum 60 Geburtstag, ed. by Göbel, Walter, Kohl, Stephan, und Zapf, Hubert (hrsg.).Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Todrowski, Christiane. 1996. Bürgerliche Technik-Utopisten. Ein Beitrag zur Funktion von Fortschrittsoptimismus und Technikeuphorie im bürgerlichen Denken des 19. Jahrhunderts. Dargestellt am Beispiel der Publikationen Max Eyths und Max Maria von Webers. (PhD Dissertation Universität zu Münster).Google Scholar
Truwant, Simon. 2014–2015. “Cassirer’s Enlightened View on the Hierarchy of the Symbolic Forms and the Task of Philosophy.” In Cassirer Studies VII-VII: An der Schwelle einer neuen geistigen Welt, 119–139.Google Scholar
Truwant, Simon. 2015a. “The Concept of ‘Function’ in Cassirer’s Historical, Systematic, and Ethical Writings.” In The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: A Novel Assessment, ed. by Friedman, Tyler and Luft, Sebastian. Berlin: de Gruyter, 289312.Google Scholar
Truwant, Simon. 2015b. “Cassirer's Functional Conception of the Human Being.” Idealistic Studies 45: 169189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, Sebastian. 2012. “Der Status der ‘philosophischen Erkenntnis’ in Ernst Cassirers ‘Metaphysik des Symbolischen’.” In Philosophie der Kultur – Kultur des Philosophierens: Ernst Cassirer im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert, ed. by Recki, Birgit. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 297319.Google Scholar
Usener, Hermann. 1896. Götternamen: Versucheiner Lehre von der Religiösen Begriffsbildung. Bonn: Verlag von Friedrich Cohen.Google Scholar
Verene, Donald Phillip. 2011. The Origins of the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Kant, Hegel, and Cassirer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Ehrenfels, Christian. 1988. “On ‘Gestalt Qualities’.” In Foundations of Gestalt Theory, ed. by Smith, Barry. Munich: Philosophia, 82117.Google Scholar
von Neumann, John. 1927. “Mathematische Begründung der Quantenmechanik.” In: Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 1–57.Google Scholar
Weyl, Hermann. 1928. Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik. Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Wolff, Walter. 1923. Technik und Dichtung: ein Überblick über hundert jahre deutschen Schrifttums, Leipzig: Olderburg Verlag.Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas. 1979. “Husserl’s Critique of Extensional Logic: A Logic That Does Not Understand Itself.” Idealistic Studies 9: 143164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Felix. 1913. Die Widerspiegelung der Technik in der deutschen Dichtung von Goethe bis zur Gegenwart. Leipzig: Ulrich.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Simon Truwant, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Interpreting Cassirer
  • Online publication: 17 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677806.016
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Simon Truwant, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Interpreting Cassirer
  • Online publication: 17 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677806.016
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Simon Truwant, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Interpreting Cassirer
  • Online publication: 17 April 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677806.016
Available formats
×