Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-569ts Total loading time: 0.482 Render date: 2022-10-03T17:30:33.947Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

3 - Fragmentation, openness and hegemony: adjudication and the WTO

from PART I - International economic law: conceptions of convergence and divergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Susy Frankel
Victoria University of Wellington
Meredith Kolsky Lewis
Victoria University of Wellington
Get access



Contemporary international law is trapped between an incomprehensible reality of fragmentation and a sentimental dream of constitutional order: between Apology and Utopia. The process of fragmentation is a direct result of the technicalisation and specialisation inherent in the modern project of a professional international law: the attempt to model international law ever more closely on its municipal counterpart; to secure for international law the autonomy of national law.

Constitutionalism forms the limit point of the juridical imagination: the ‘iron cage’, or condition of possibility, of modern juridical thought. As a result, international lawyers generally, and (incorporationist) trade lawyers in particular, have sought refuge in the idea of ‘coherence’. In accordance with this ideal, the disparate branches of a fragmented international law are to, and thus can, be brought, non-coercively, into a rational order – an order within which the essence of each sub-system is preserved, and their surface differences are shown to yield an underlying harmony of interests.

However, this dream is unsubstantiated! In reality, coherence represents not a natural confluence of interests, but the unequal compromise of competing worldviews caught in mortal conflict. Because coherence is an unattainable goal, the search for ‘coherence’ becomes the wilful disregard of a reality of conflict, the hegemonic imposition of a particular project which has, always already, subsumed and regulated its ‘others’.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, Modern Law Review, 70 (2007) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N., ‘The Concept of Law and “The Concept of Law”’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14 (1994) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Weber, Science as a Vocation; see also Rasch, W., Niklas Luhmann's Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation (Stanford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Simma, B. and Pulkowski, D., ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006) 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A., ‘Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative and the Philosophy of Science’, The Monist, 60 (1977) 453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, J., ‘Mercy, Particularity, and the Map from the Void’, Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, 93 (2007) 217Google Scholar
Darnton, R., ‘Philosophers Trim the Tree of Knowledge: The Epistemological Strategy of the Encyclopedie’ in The Great Cat Massacre, and Other Episodes in French Cultural History (London, Penguin Group, 2001)Google Scholar
Camus, A., The Rebel (London, Penguin Group, 2000), pp. 230–5; G. Teubner, ‘How Law Thinks’, Law and Society Review, 23 (1989) 727Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity (Stanford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Teubner, , Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford, Blackwell, 1993)Google Scholar
Rasch, W., Sovereignty and Its Discontents: On the Primacy of Conflict and the Structure of the Political (London, Birkbeck Law Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Beckett, J., ‘Conflicting Orders: How Peace is Waged’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 20 (2007) 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J., ‘Constitutionalising Self Regulation’, Modern Law Review, 59 (1996) 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. and A. Fischer-Lescano, ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004) 999Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ‘International Law in Europe: Between Tradition and Renewal’, European Journal of International Law, 16 (2005) 113, p. 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroos, A. and Mehling, M., ‘Dispelling the Chimera of “Self-Contained Regimes”: International Law and the WTO’, European Journal of International Law, 16 (2005) 857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N., Social Systems (Stanford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O. and Slaughter, A-M., Legalization And World Politics (Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Slaughter, A-M., ‘International Law in a World of Liberal States’, European Journal of International Law, 6 (1995) 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J. E., ‘Do Liberal States Behave Better? A Critique of Slaughter's Liberal Theory’, European Journal of International Law, 12 (2001) 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R., Law's Empire (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Beckett, J., ‘Countering Uncertainty and Ending Up/Down Arguments: Prolegomena to a Response to NAIL’, European Journal of International Law, 16 (2005) 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P., ‘Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann’, European Journal of International Law, 13 (2002) 815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. T. F., ‘Reflecting on “Linkage”: Cognitive and Institutional Change in the International Trading System’, Modern Law Review, 70 (2007) 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broackes, J., ‘Realism, Scepticism and the Lament for an Archimedean Point: Stroud and the Quest for Reality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 68 (2004) 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M., ‘The WTO's Use of Relevant Rules of International Law: An Analysis of the Biotech Case’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56 (2007) 907Google Scholar
Beckett, J., ‘Rebel Without a Cause? Martti Koskenniemi and the Critical Legal Project’, German Law Journal, 7 (2006) 1045Google Scholar
Cheyne, I., ‘Gateways to the Precautionary Principle in WTO Law’, Journal of Environmental Law, 19 (2007) 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, S., Doing What Comes Naturally (Durham NC, Duke University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Sharrock, W. and Anderson, B., The Ethnomethodologists (Chichester UK, Ellis Horwood, 1986)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., From Apology to Utopia, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Scobbie, I., ‘Wicked Heresies or Legitimate Perspectives? Theory and International Law’ in Evans, M. D. (ed.) International Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’, American Journal of International Law, 95 (2001) 535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, J., ‘The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution’, Harvard International Law Journal, 40 (1999) 333Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian develops the concept of sentimentality, which she describes as our capacity to ‘embellish [our] arbitrary selectivity of compassion in rhapsodies or melodramas’; or, for lawyers, objective narratives of legal perfection and personal exculpation. All of which function to externalise suffering and deny our own implication, ‘leav[ing] us emotionally and politically intact’, ‘secure’ but gazing only at a comforting illusion, like ‘coherence’ or ‘conflict-avoidance’. See Mourning Becomes the Law (Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse-Khan, H. Grosse, ‘Proportionality and Balancing within the Objectives of Intellectual Property Protection’ in Torremans, P. (ed.), Intellectual Property and Human Rights (Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands, Kluwer Law International; Enhanced edn of Copyright and Human Rights, 2008)Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., Essays in Philosophy and Jurisprudence (USA, Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Sands, P., ‘Environmental Protection in the Twenty-First Century: Sustainable Development and International Law’ in Revesz, R. L., Sands, P. and Stewart, R. B. (eds.) Environmental Law, the Economy, and Sustainable Development (Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 387Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., ‘The Third Question: The Creative Use of Paradoxes in Law and Legal History’, Journal of Law and Society, 15 (1988) 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, R., ‘Nomos and Narrative’, Harvard Law Review, 97 (1983) 4Google Scholar
Johns, F., ‘Guantanamo Bay and the Annihilation of the Exception’, European Journal of International Law, 16 (2005) 613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M., The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (T. Parsons trans.) (London, Allen & Unwin, 1989)Google Scholar
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats