Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-22T23:55:30.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Current Challenges in International Investment Dispute Settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2021

Manfred Elsig
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Rodrigo Polanco
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Peter van den Bossche
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
International Economic Dispute Settlement
Demise or Transformation?
, pp. 189 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Baumgartner, J. 2017. Treaty Shopping in International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, A. 2013. “Do Trade and Investment Agreements Lead to More FDI? Accounting for Key Provisions inside the Black Box,” International Economics and Economic Policy 10: 247–75.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, J. 2019. “The Impact of Investment Treaties on Domestic Governance in Myanmar.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3644056.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. and Waibel, M. 2017. The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, H.-M. 1986. “Investment Protection Treaties: Recent Trends and Prospects,” Aussenwirtschaft 41(1): 99104.Google Scholar
The British Chambers of Commerce in China. 2018. “British Business in China: Member Sentiment Survey.” www.britishchamber.cn/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/181217_BC_Sentiment-Survey_WEB.pdf.Google Scholar
Brower, C. H. and Blanchard, S. 2014. “What’s in a Meme? The Truth about Investor-State Arbitration: Why It Need Not, and Must Not, Be Repossessed by States,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52(3): 689777.Google Scholar
Calamita, J. 2015. “The Rule of Law, Investment Treaties, and Economic Growth: Mapping Normative and Empirical Questions.” In Jowell, J., Thomas, C. and van Zyl Smit, J. (Eds.), The Importance of the Rule of Law in Promoting Development. Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law, pp. 103–28.Google Scholar
Craig, P. 1997. “Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework,” Public Law 467–87.Google Scholar
DePalma, A. 2001. ‘NAFTA’s Powerful Little Secret, Obscure Tribunals Settle Disputes, But Go Too Far, Critics Say,” The New York Times, 11 March.Google Scholar
Denza, E. and Poulsen, L. 2020. “The Euro-Arab Investment Treaty That Nearly Was,” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 69: 267–99.Google Scholar
Dolzer, R. and Stevens, M. 1995. Bilateral Investment Treaties. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Echandi, R. 2011. “What Do Developing Countries Expect from the International Investment Regime.” In Alvarez, J., Sauvant, K., Ahmed, K. and Vizcaino, G. (Eds.), The Evolving International Investment Regime. New York: Oxford University Press; pp. 321.Google Scholar
European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (EFILA), 2015, ‘A Response to the Criticism Against ISDS,’ 17 May, Brussels. http://efila.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/EFILA_in_response_to_the-criticism_of_ISDS_final_draft.pdf.Google Scholar
Franck, S. D. 2007. “Integrating Investment Treaty Conflict and Dispute Systems Design,” Minnesota Law Review 92(1): 161230.Google Scholar
Gertz, G. 2014. “Book Review: The Empire Trap: The Rise and Fall of U.S. Intervention to Protect American Property Overseas, 1893–2013 by Noel Maurer,” International Affairs 90(4): 1003–5.Google Scholar
Gertz, G. 2016. “Commercial Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy,” GEG Working Paper 2016/119.Google Scholar
Gertz, G., Jandhyala, S. and Poulsen, L. 2018. “Legalization, Diplomacy, and Development: Do Investment Treaties De-politicize Investment Disputes?World Development 107: 238–52.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. 2005. “International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance,” International Review of Law and Economics 25(1): 107–23.Google Scholar
Hepburn, J., Paparinskis, M., Poulsen, L. and Waibel, M. 2019. “Investment Law before Arbitration,” Working paper (on file).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantor, M. 2014. “Comparing Political Risk Insurance and Investment Treaty Arbitration.” In: Borzu, S., Birch, N., Laird, I. and Rivas, J. (Eds.), Revolution in the International Rule of Law: Essays in honor of Don Wallace, Jr. New York: Juris Publishing, pp. 455–74.Google Scholar
Maurer, N. 2013. The Empire Trap: The Rise and Fall of U.S. Intervention to Protect American Property Overseas, 1893–2013. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
OECD 2019a. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – Inward FDI Stocks by Partner Country – OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/fdi/inward-fdi-stocks-by-partner-country.htm#indicator-chart.Google Scholar
OECD 2019b. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – Outward FDI Stocks by Partner Country – OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/fdi/outward-fdi-stocks-by-partner-country.htm#indicator-chart.Google Scholar
OECD 2019c. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – FDI Stocks – OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/fdi/fdi-stocks.htm#indicator-chart.Google Scholar
OECD 2019d. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – Outward FDI Flows by Partner Country – OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/fdi/outward-fdi-flows-by-partner-country.htm#indicator-chart.Google Scholar
OECD 2019e. Development Aid at a Glance – Statistics by Region – Asia. Paris: OECD. www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-data/Asia-Development-Aid-at-a-Glance-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M. 2012. “The Limits of Depoliticisation in Contemporary Investor–State Arbitration,” Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law (3): 271–82.Google Scholar
Paulsson, J. 2005. “Indirect Expropriation: Is the Right to Regulate at Risk?” 12 December, Paris. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/52/36055332.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2019.Google Scholar
Puig, S. 2013. “Emergence & Dynamism in International Organizations: ICSID, Investor-State Arbitration & International Investment Law,” Georgetown Journal of International Law 44: 531608.Google Scholar
Polanco, R. 2019. The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poulsen, L. 2010. “The Importance of BITs for Foreign Direct Investment and Political Risk Insurance: Revisiting the Evidence.” In Sauvant, K. (Ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2009/2010, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 539–74.Google Scholar
Poulsen, L. 2015. Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poulsen, L. 2020. “Beyond Credible Commitments: (Investment) Treaties as Focal Points,” International Studies Quarterly 64(1): 2634.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. 2014. “State-to-State Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Hybrid Theory of Interdependent Rights and Shared Interpretive Authority,” Harvard International Law Journal 55(1): 170.Google Scholar
Sasse, J. P. 2011. An Economic Analysis of Bilateral Investment Treaties. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
Sattorova, M. 2018. The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Schill, S. W. 2009. The Multilateralization of International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schill, S. W. 2010. “Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law and Comparative Public Law.” In Schill, S. W. (Ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–82.Google Scholar
St John, T. 2018. The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salacuse, J. 2007. “Is There a Better Way – Alternative Methods of Treaty-Based, Investor State Dispute Resolution,” Fordham International Law Journal 31: 138–85.Google Scholar
Schwebel, S. 2016. “Introduction.” In Franke, U., Magnusson, A. and Dahquist, J. (Eds.), Arbitrating for Peace: How Arbitration Made a Difference, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 16.Google Scholar
Staley, E. 1935. War and the Private Investor: A Study in the Relations of International Politics and International Private Investment. Doubleday, Doran & Co.Google Scholar
Steinitz, M. 2011. “Whose Claim Is This Anyway – Third-Party Litigation Funding,” Minnesota Law Review 95: 1268–338.Google Scholar
Van Harten, G. 2010. “Investment Treaty Arbitration, Procedural Fairness, and the Rule of Law.” In Schill, S. W. (Ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. Oxford University Press, pp. 627–57.Google Scholar
Van Harten, G. and Malysheuski, P. 2016. “Who Has Benefited Financially from Investment Treaty Arbitration? An Evaluation of the Size and Wealth of Claimants,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research Paper No 14/2016.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K. 2010. Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wälde, T. 2005. “The ‘Umbrella’ Clause in Investment Arbitration: A Comment on Original Intentions and Recent Cases,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 6(2): 183236.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. A. and Kupfer Schneider, A. 2013. “The Thoughtful Integration of Mediation into Bilateral Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 18: 71144.Google Scholar
World Bank 2019. Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) 2019 Interactive > Interactive Data Access. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports.+Interactive+Data+Access.+https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports.>Google Scholar
Xiao, Z. 2021. “The Evolution of the Settlement of Investor-State Disputes in China,” draft PhD thesis, on file.Google Scholar
Yackee, J. 2008. “Do We Really Need BITs? Toward a Return to Contract in International Investment Law,” Asian Journal of WTO and Health Law 3: 121–46.Google Scholar
Yackee, J. 2008–9. “Pacta Sunt Servanda and State Promises to Foreign Investors before Bilateral Investment Treaties: Myth and Reality,” Fordham International Law Journal 32(5): 1550–613.Google Scholar
Yackee, J. 2009. “Do BITs Really Work? Revisiting the Empirical Link between Investment Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment.” In Sauvant, K. and Sachs, L. (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties and Investment Flows. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 379–94.Google Scholar
Yackee, J. 2011. “Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Some Hints from Alternative Evidence,” Virginia Journal of International Law 51(2): 397441.Google Scholar
Yackee, J. 2014. “Political Risk and International Investment Law,” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 24(3): 477500.Google Scholar
Yackee, J. 2019. “Investor-State Dispute Settlement at the Dawn of International Investment Law: France, Mauritania, and the Nationalization of the MIFERMA Iron Ore Operations,” American Journal of Legal History 59(1): 71110.Google Scholar
Yackee, J. 2021. “Expelling the ‘Sinister Vilgrain’: Nationalization, Diplomacy, and Sugar in the People’s Republic of Congo, 1970–1978,” French Historical Studies 44(1): 119–47.Google Scholar
Živković, V. 2019. “Fair and Equitable Treatment between the International and National Rule of Law,” Journal of World Investment and Trade 20(4): 513–52.Google Scholar

References

Álvarez Zárate, J. M. 2018. “Legitimacy Concerns of the Proposed Multilateral Investment Court: Is Democracy Possible?Boston College Law Review 59: 2765–90.Google Scholar
Antonietti, A. 2006. “The 2006 Amendments to the ICSID Rules and Regulations and the Additional Facility Rules,” ICSID Review FILJ 21: 427–48.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. 1997. “Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 46: 3754.Google Scholar
Brower, C. and Schill, S. 2009. “Is Arbitration a Threat or a Boon to the Legitimacy of International Investment Law?Chicago Journal of International Law 9: 471–98.Google Scholar
Bungenberg, M. and Reinisch, A. 2018. From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, London: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Calamita, N. Jansen 2017. “The (In)Compatibility of Appellate Mechanisms with Existing Instruments of the Investment Treaty Regime,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 18: 585627.Google Scholar
Chen, H. 2018. “China’s Innovative ISDS Mechanisms and Their Implications,” AJIL Unbound 112: 207–11.Google Scholar
EU 2018. Council of the European Union, “Negotiating Directives for a Convention Establishing a Multilateral Court for the Settlement of Investment Disputes,” EU Doc. No. 12981/17 ADD 1.Google Scholar
De Mestral, A. (Ed.) 2017. Second Thoughts – Investor–State Arbitration Between Developed Democracies, Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
De Mestral, A. and Lévesque, C. (Eds.) 2012. Improving International Investment Agreements, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, P. and Olivet, C. 2012. Profiting from Injustice – How Law Firms, Arbitrators and Financiers Are Fuelling an Investment Arbitration Boom, Brussels: Corporate Europe Observatory and Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Echandi, R. and Sauvé, P. (Eds.) 2013. Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fach Gómez, K. 2018. “Diversity and the Principle of Independence and Impartiality in the Future Multilateral Investment Court,” The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribuna/s 17: 7897.Google Scholar
Hanessian, G. and Duggal, K. 2017. “The Final 2015 Indian Model BIT: Is This the Change the World Wishes to See?ICSID Review 32: 216–26.Google Scholar
Hindelang, S. and Krajewski, M. (Eds.) 2016. Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) 2017. ‘EU–Japan EPA Negotiations Finalized Without Investment; EU–Mexico Updated FTA Nears Completion,” www.iisd.org/itn/2017/12/21/eu-japan-epa-negotiations-finalized-without-investment-eu-mexico-updated-fta-nears-completion/. Accessed on 27 January 2020.Google Scholar
Kalicki, J. and Joubin-Bret, A. (Eds.) 2015. Reshaping the Investor–State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Potestà, M. 2016. Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of investor–state Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism? Analysis and Roadmap. Geneva: CIDS-Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement.Google Scholar
Kulick, A. (Ed.) 2016. Reassertion of Control over the Investment Treaty Regime, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langford, M., Behn, D. and Usynin, M. 2018. “Does Nationality Matter? Arbitral Background and the Universality of International Investment Regime,” ESIL Conference, Manchester, September 2018, https://www.jus.uio.no/ior/english/people/aca/malcolml/paper–––does-nationality-matter–––esil-2018-%2820-august%29.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2021.Google Scholar
Leikin, E., Gadodia, S. and Loudon, C. 2018. “The State Doesn’t Strike Back After All: India’s Final Model BIT Takes the Bite Out of Investor Obligations and Eliminates State Counterclaims,” Transnational Dispute Management 15:2.Google Scholar
Miles, K. 2013. The Origins of International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ning, H. and Qi, T. 2018. “Multilateral Investment Court: The Gap Between the EU and China,” Chinese Journal of Global Governance 4: 154–75.Google Scholar
Polanco, R. 2019. The Return of the Home State to Investor–State Disputes – Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puig, S. 2014. “Social Capital in the Arbitration Market,” European Journal of International Law 25: 387424.Google Scholar
Puig, S. and Shaffer, G. 2018. “Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law,” American Journal of International Law 112: 361409.Google Scholar
Rajput, A. 2017. Protection of Foreign Investment in India and Investment Treaty Arbitration, Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ranjan, P. 2019. India and Bilateral Investment Treaties: Refusal, Acceptance, Backlash, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ranjan, P. and Anand, P. 2017. “The 2016 Model Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Critical Deconstruction,” Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 8: 154.Google Scholar
Reinisch, A. 2016. “Will the EU’s Proposal Concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP Lead to Enforceable Awards – The Limits of Modifying the ICSID Convention and the Nature of Investment Arbitration,” Journal of International Economic Law 19: 761–86.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. 2018. “Incremental, Systemic, and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor–State Arbitration,” American Journal of International Law 112: 410–32.Google Scholar
Sachetim, H. and Codeço, R. 2019. “The Investor–State Dispute Settlement System Amidst Crisis, Collapse, and Reform,” Arbitration Brief 6: 2059.Google Scholar
Sauvant, K. and Ortino, F. 2013. Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Options for the Future, Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.Google Scholar
Sauvant, P. 2016. “The Evolving International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Ways Forward” E15 Task Force on Investment Policy – Policy Options Paper, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Schill, S. 2009. The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schill, S. 2017. “Reforming Investor–State Dispute Settlement: A (Comparative and International) Constitutional Law Framework,” Journal of International Economic Law 20: 649–72.Google Scholar
Schill, S. 2019. “From Investor–State Dispute Settlement to a Multilateral Investment Court? Evaluating Options from an EU Law Perspective,” In European Parliament (Ed.), EU Investment Protection After the ECJ Opinion on Singapore: Question of Competence and Coherence. Brussels: European Union, www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EXPO_STU(2019)603476. Accessed 28 January 2020.Google Scholar
Schill, S. and Vidigal, G. 2019. “Designing Investment Dispute Settlement à la Carte: Insights from Comparative Institutional Design Analysis,” The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 18: 311–44.Google Scholar
Schill, S. and Briese, R. 2009. “If the State Considers: Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 13: 61140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiderman, D. 2008. Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schreuer, C. 2008. “Preliminary Rulings in Investment Arbitration,” In Sauvant, K. (Ed.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M. 2015. Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
St John, T. 2020. The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tienhaara, K. 2009. The Expropriation of Environmental Governance: Protecting Foreign Investors at the Expense of Public Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Titi, C. 2018. “The Evolution of Substantive Investment Protections in Recent Trade and Investment Treaties,” RTA Exchange, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and the Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL 2018, “Report of Working Group III (Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the Work of Its Thirty-Sixth Session,” UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/964, 6 November 2018,Google Scholar
UNCITRAL 2019a. “Possible Reform of Investor–state Dispute Settlement (ISDS), Note by the Secretariat,” UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.166 and A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.166/Add.1, 30 July 2019.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL 2019b, “Possible Reform of Investor–state Dispute Settlement (ISDS) – Submission from the Government of Brazil,” UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.171, 11 June 2019.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL 2019c, “Possible Reform of Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) – Submission from the Government of China,” UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.177, 19 July 2019.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL 2019d. “Submission of the European Union and Its Member States to UNCITRAL Working Group III,” http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/157631.htm. Accessed 5 March 2019 (reproduced in UNCITRAL, UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.159/Add.1, 24 January 2019.Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2019. “World Investment Report 2019 – Special Economic Zones” (United Nations).Google Scholar
Van Harten, G. 2007. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Harten, G. 2010. “Public Statement on the International Investment Regime,” 31 August, www.osgoode.yorku.ca/public-statement-international-investment-regime-31-august-2010/. Accessed 27 January 2020.Google Scholar
Vidigal, G. and Stevens, B. 2018. “Brazil’s New Model of Dispute Settlement for Investment: Return to the Past or Alternative for the Future?Journal of World Investment & Trade 19: 475512.Google Scholar
Waibel, M. et al. (eds.) 2010. The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters Kluwer International.Google Scholar
Wong, J. and Yackee, J. 2010. “The 2006 Procedural and Transparency-Related Amendments to the ICSID Arbitration Rules: Model Intentions, Moderate Proposals, and Modest Returns,” In Sauvant, K. (Ed.), The Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2009-2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–74.Google Scholar
Yee, S. 2018. “Dispute Settlement on the Belt and Road: Ideas on System, Spirit and Style,” Chinese Journal of International Law 17: 907–14.Google Scholar

References

Alschner, W., Pauwelyn, J. and Puig, S. 2017. “The Data-Driven Future of International Economic Law,” Journal of International Economic Law 20(2): 217–31.Google Scholar
Arato, J., Brown, C. and Ortino, F. 2020. “Parsing and Managing Inconsistency in Investor-State Dispute Settlement,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 336–73.Google Scholar
Arcuri, A. and Violi, F. 2019. “Human Rights and Investor–State Dispute Settlement: Changing (Almost) Everything, so that Everything Stays the Same?Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale 3: 579–96.Google Scholar
Behn, D. 2018. “Performance of Investment Treaty Arbitration.” In Squatrito, T., et al (Eds.) The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77113.Google Scholar
Behn, D., Berge, T. and Langford, M. 2018. “Poor States or Poor Governance? Explaining Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 38(3): 333–89.Google Scholar
Behn, D., Fauchald, O.K. and Langford, M. 2021a. (Eds.) The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Behn, D., Fauchald, O.K. and Langford, M. 2021b. “Private or Public Good? An Empirical Perspective on Investment Arbitration.” In Iovane, M., et al (Eds.) The Protection of General Interests in Contemporary International Law: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Behn, D., Langford, M., and Létourneau-Tremblay, L. 2020. “Empirical Perspectives on Investment Arbitration: What Do We Know? Does It Matter?Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 188250.Google Scholar
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N. and Dietrich Brauch, M.. 2017. “Is “Moonlighting” a Problem? The Role of ICJ Judges in ISDS,” IISD Commentary.Google Scholar
Bjorklund, A., et al 2020. “The Diversity Deficit in International Investment Arbitration,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 410–40.Google Scholar
Brekoulakis, S. 2013. “Systemic Bias and the Institution of International Arbitration: A New Approach to Arbitral Decision-Making,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 4(3): 553–85.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, T. 2006. “The Proliferation of Disputes, Dispute Settlement Procedures and Respect for the Rule of Law,” Transnational Dispute Management 3(5).Google Scholar
Cleis, M. 2017. The Independence and Impartiality of ICSID Arbitrators: Current Case Law, Alternative Approaches, and Improvement Suggestions. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Commission, J. and Moloo, R. 2018. Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daele, K. 2012. Challenge and Disqualification of Arbitrators in International Arbitration. Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
De Luca, A., Feldman, M., Paparinskis, M. and Titi, C. 2020. “Responding to Incorrect Decision-Making in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Policy Options,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 374409.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dimitropoulos, G. 2018. “Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform and Theory of Institutional Design,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9(4): 535–69.Google Scholar
Dupont, C. and Schultz, T. 2013. “Do Hard Economic Times Lead to International Legal Disputes? The Case of Investment Arbitration,” Swiss Political Science Review 19(2): 564–69.Google Scholar
Franck, S. 2007. “Empirically Evaluating Claims About Investment Treaty Arbitration,” North Carolina Law Review 80(1): 156.Google Scholar
Franck, S. 2009. “Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Harvard International Law Journal 50(2): 436–87.Google Scholar
Franck, S. 2014. “Conflating Politics and Development: Examining Investment Treaty Outcomes,” Virginia Journal of International Law 55(1): 1371.Google Scholar
Franck, S. and Wylie, L.. 2015. “Predicting Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Duke Law Journal 65: 459520.Google Scholar
Franck, S., et al 2017. “Inside the Arbitrator’s Mind,” Emory Law Journal 66: 1116–39.Google Scholar
Friedland, P. and Brekoulakis, S. 2018. “2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration.” Queen Mary University of London.Google Scholar
Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. and Létourneau-Tremblay, L. 2020. “Question of Impartiality: Who Are the Dissenting Arbitrators in International Investment Treaty Arbitration?” In Baetens, F. (Ed.) Identity on the Bench: Implications for the Legitimacy of International Adjudication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giorgetti, C., et al 2020. “Lack of Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators in Investment Dispute Settlement: Assessing Challenges and Reform Options,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 441–74.Google Scholar
Greenwood, L. and Baker, M. 2015. “Is the Balance Getting Better? An Update on the Issue of Gender Diversity,” Arbitration International 31(3): 413–23.Google Scholar
Greenwood, L. 2017. “Tipping the Balance: Diversity and Inclusion in International Arbitration,” Arbitration International 33(1): 99108.Google Scholar
Grossman, N. 2016. “Achieving Sex-Representative International Court Benches,” American Journal of International Law 110(1): 8295.Google Scholar
ICSID 2019. “2019 ICSID Annual Report,” October 2019.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, D. 2010. “Repeat Appointment Factor: Exploring Decision Patterns of Elite Investment Arbitrators,” Cornell Law Review 96: 90118.Google Scholar
Kidane, W. 2017. The Culture of International Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kinnear, M., et al (Eds.) 2015. Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID. Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Potestà, M. 2017. “The Composition of a Multilateral Investment Court and of an Appeal Mechanism for Investment Awards,” CIDS Supplemental Report.Google Scholar
Langford, M., Behn, D. and Lie, R. 2017. “The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration,” Journal of International Economic Law 20(2): 301–32.Google Scholar
Langford, M. and Behn, D. 2018. “Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Arbitrator?European Journal of International Law 29(2): 551–80.Google Scholar
Langford, M., Creamer, C. and Behn, D., ‘Regime Responsiveness in International Economic Disputes’, in S. Gáspár-Szilágyi, D. Behn and M. Langford (eds.), Adjudicating Trade and Investment Disputes: Convergence or Divergence? (Cambridge University Press, 2020): 244–284.Google Scholar
Langford, M. 2020. “The Changing Sociology of the Investment Arbitration Market: The Case of Double Hatting,” Paper presented at IELAP Seminar, 27 February, King’s College London, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Langford, M., Potesta, M., Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Behn, D. 2020. “Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions, An Introduction,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 167–87.Google Scholar
Langford, M., Behn, D. and Usynin, M. 2021. “The West and the Rest: Geographic Diversity and the Role of Arbitrator Nationality in Investment Arbitration.” In Behn, D., Fauchald, O. K. and Langford, M. (Eds.) The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, J. 2012. “Dealing with Arbitrator ‘Issue Conflicts’ in International Arbitration,” Dispute Resolution Journal 6: 6072.Google Scholar
Lie, R. 2021. “The Influence of Law Firms in Investment Arbitration.” In Behn, D., Fauchald, O. K. and Langford, M. (Eds.) The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2015. “The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators Are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators from Venus?American Journal of International Law 109(4): 761805.Google Scholar
Puig, S. 2014. “Social Capital in the Arbitration Market,” European Journal of International Law 25(2): 387424.Google Scholar
Puig, S. 2016. “Blinding International Justice,” Virginia Journal of International Law 56(3): 647700.Google Scholar
Puig, S. 2019. “Debiasing International Economic Law,” European Journal of International Law 30(4): 1339–57.Google Scholar
Puig, S. and Shaffer, G. 2018. “Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law,” American Journal of International Law 112(3): 361412.Google Scholar
Puig, S. and Strezhnev, A. 2017a. “Affiliation Bias in Arbitration: An Experimental Approach,” Journal of Legal Studies 46(2): 371–92.Google Scholar
Puig, S. and Strezhnev, A. 2017b. “The David Effect and ISDS,” European Journal of International Law 28(3): 731–61.Google Scholar
Puig, S. and Shaffer, G. 2018. “Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law,” American Journal of International Law 112(3): 361409.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. 2018. “Incremental, Systemic, and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor–state Arbitration,” American Journal of International Law 112(3): 410–32.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. and St John, T. 2019. “UNCITRAL and ISDS Reforms: Agenda-Widening and Paradigm-Shifting,” 20 September, EJIL: Talk!Google Scholar
Sattorova, M. 2018. The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? Cambridge: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. and Dupont, C. 2015. “Investment Arbitration: Promoting the Rule of Law or Over-Empowering Investors? A Quantitative Study,” European Journal of International Law 25(4): 1147–68.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. 2020. “The Ethos of Arbitration.” In Schultz, T. and Ortino, F. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–59.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. and Ginsburg, T. 2012. “The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship,” American Journal of International Law 106(1): 146.Google Scholar
St John, T., Behn, D., Langford, M., and Lie, R. 2018. “Glass Ceilings and Arbitral Dealings: Gender and Investment Arbitration,” PluriCourts Working Paper.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. and Grisel, F. 2017. The Evolution of International Arbitration: Judicialization, Governance, Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., Chung, M. and Saltzman, A. 2017. “Arbitral Lawmaking and State Power: An Empirical Analysis of Investor–State Arbitration,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 8(4): 608–32.Google Scholar
Strezhnev, A. 2016. “Detecting Bias in International Investment Arbitration,” Paper presented at the 57th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association – Atlanta, Georgia, 16–19 March 2016.Google Scholar
Strezhnev, A. 2017. “Why Rich Countries Win Investment Disputes: Taking Selection Seriously,” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Strezhnev, A. and Puig, S. 2019. “Diversity and Compliance in Investment Arbitration: Future Directions in Empirical Research on Investment Law and Arbitration,” Paper presented at the Oslo LEGINVEST Conference, 31 January 2019.Google Scholar
Tienhaara, K. 2011. “Regulatory Chill and the Threat of Arbitration: A View from Political Science.” In Brown, C. and Miles, K. (Eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 606–27.Google Scholar
Trakman, L. 2007. “The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators Reconsidered,” International Arbitration Law Review 10: 999.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL 2017a. “Report of Working Group III (Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the Work of Its Thirty-Fourth Session (Vienna, 27 November–1 December 2017),” 19 December, UN Doc A/CN.9/930/Rev.1.Google Scholar
UNCITRAL 2017b. “Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Fiftieth Session,” 3–21 July, UN Doc A/72/17.Google Scholar
van den Berg, A. 2010. “Dissenting Opinions by Party-Appointed Arbitrators in Investment Arbitration.” In Arsanjani, M., et al (Eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W Michael Reisman. Leiden: Brill, pp. 821–43.Google Scholar
Van Harten, G. 2012a. “Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication: An Empirical Study of Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50(1): 211–68.Google Scholar
Van Harten, G. 2012b. “The (Lack of) Women Arbitrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Columbia FDI Perspectives 59.Google Scholar
Van Harten, G. 2016. “Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication (Part Two): An Examination of Hypotheses of Bias in Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 53(2): 540–86.Google Scholar
Van Harten, G. 2018. “Leaders in the Expansive and Restrictive Interpretation of Investment Treaties: A Descriptive Study of ISDS Awards to 2010,” European Journal of International Law 29(2): 507–49.Google Scholar
Van Harten, G., Kelsey, J. and Schneiderman, D. 2019. “Phase 2 of the UNCITRAL ISDS Review: Why ‘Other Matters’ Really Matter,” Osgoode Hall Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2.Google Scholar
Waibel, M. and Wu, Y. 2017. “Are Arbitrators Political? Evidence from International Investment Arbitration,” ASIL Research Forum Working Paper.Google Scholar
Wellhausen, R. 2016. “Recent Trends in Investor–state Dispute Settlement,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 7(1): 117–35.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×