Alford, Roger P., Baltag, Crina, Hall, Mathew E. K. and Sasson, Monique. ‘Empirical Research of National Courts Vacatur and Enforcement of International Commercial Arbitration Awards’. Journal of International Arbitration (2022): 299–330.Google Scholar

Arbitration and Party Autonomy (APA). Research project at the University of Oslo, Arbitration and the Not Unlimited Party Autonomy, Programme and transcript of seminar held in Oslo on 21 November 2011, www.jus.uio.no/ifp/english/research/projects/choice-of-law/events/2011/2011-arbitration-and-the-not-unlimited-party-autonomy.html.Google Scholar

Arroyo, Diego Fernández. ‘Compétence exclusive et compétence exorbitante dans les relations privées internationals’. Volume 323 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2006).Google Scholar

Arroyo, Diego Fernández. ‘Nothing Is for Free: The Prices to Pay for Arbitrabilizing Legal Disputes’. In Cadiet, Loïc, Hess, Burkard and Isidro, Marta Requejo (eds.), Privatizing Dispute Resolution (Nomos, 2019): 617–46.Google Scholar

Arroyo, Diego Fernández and Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. Applicable Law Issues in International Arbitration (Centre for Studies and Research of the Hague Academy of International Law, forthcoming 2023).Google Scholar

Arvesen, Nanette. ‘Avtalte ordninger som kan forfordele andre kreditorer og ordre public’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Norsk ordre public som skranke for partsautonomi i internasjonale kontrakter (Universitetsforlaget, 2018): 240–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audit, Bernard. ‘The Vienna Sales Convention and the Lex Mercatoria’. In Carbonneau, Thomas E. (ed.), Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration (Juris Publishing, 1990): 139–60.Google Scholar

Bagner, Hans. ‘Observations on CME v. Czech Republic’. Stockholm Arbitration Report (2003): 250.Google Scholar

Baizeau, Domitille and Hayes, Tessa. ‘The Arbitral Tribunal’s Duty and Power to Address Corruption Sua Sponte’. In Menaker, Andrea (ed.), International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity, ICCA Congress Series, Volume 19 (Kluwer Law International, 2017): 225–65.Google Scholar

Baltag, Crina. ‘Article V(1)(e) of the New York Convention: To Enforce or Not to Enforce Set Aside Arbitral Awards?’ Journal of International Arbitration 39.3 (2022): 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banifatemi, Yas. ‘The Impact of Corruption on “Gateway Issues” of Arbitrability, Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Procedural Issues’. Dossiers of the ICC Institute (2015): 16–31.Google Scholar

Barceló III, John J. ‘Who Decides the Arbitrator’s Jurisdiction? Separability and Competence-Competence in Transnational Perspective’. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 36 (2003): 1115–36.Google Scholar

Barceló III, John J. ‘Kompetenz-Kompetenz and Its Negative Effect: A Comparative View’. Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper 17–40 (2017).Google Scholar

Basedow, Jürgen. ‘The Hague Principles on Choice of Law: Their Addressees and Impact’. Uniform Law Review 22.2 (2017): 304–15.Google Scholar

Beale, Hugh. ‘English Law Reform and the Impact of European Contract Law’. In Vogenauer, Stefan and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.), The Harmonisation of European Contract Law (Hart Publishing, 2006): 31–8.Google Scholar

Beale, Hugh. Chitty on Contracts, 34th ed. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2022).Google Scholar

Beilfuss, Cristina González, Carpaneto, Laura, Kruger, Thalia, Pretelli, Ilaria and Zupan, Mirela. Regulation 2019/1111 (Brussels IIb) (Edward Elgar, forthcoming 2023).Google Scholar

Benedettelli, Massimo V. ‘Determining the Applicable Law in Commercial and Investment Arbitration: Two Intertwined Road Maps for Conflicts-Solving’. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 37.3 (2022): 687–722.Google Scholar

Berger, Klaus Peter. The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoria (Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar

Berger, Klaus Peter and Arntz, Thomas. ‘Good Faith as a “General Organising Principle” of the Common Law’. Arbitration International 32 (2016): 167–78.Google Scholar

Bermann, George. ‘International Arbitration and Private International Law’. General Course on Private International Law, Volume 381 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bermann, George. ‘The Role of National Courts at the Threshold of Arbitration’. In Menaker, Andrea (ed.), International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity (Kluwer Law International, 2017): 443–57.Google Scholar

Bermann, George. ‘After First Options: Delegation Run Amok’. American Review of International Arbitration 32 (2021): 15–40.Google Scholar

Binder, Christina, Kriebaum, Ursula, Reinisch, August and Wittich, Stephan (eds.). International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biswas, Tushar Kumar. ‘Turkey’. In Basedow, Jürgen, Rühl, Gisela, Ferrari, Franco and de Miguel Asensio, Pedro (eds.), Encyclopedia of Private International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar

Blessing, Marc. ‘Choice of Substantive Law in International Arbitration’. Journal of International Arbitration 14.2 (1997): 39–65.Google Scholar

Blessing, Marc. ‘Keynotes on Arbitral Decision-Making: The New 1998 ICC Rules of Arbitration’. ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin Special Supplement (1998): 44.Google Scholar

Boele-Woelki, Katharina. ‘Party Autonomy in Litigation and Arbitration in View of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’. Volume 379 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2016).Google Scholar

Bogdan, Michael. ‘1980 Års EG-konvention om tillämplig lag på kontraktsrättsliga förpliktelser–synpunkter beträffande den svenska inställningen’. Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 96.1 (1982): 3–49.Google Scholar

Bogdan, Michael and Hellner, Michael. Svensk internationell privat- och processrätt, 9th ed. (Norstedst Juridik, 2020).Google Scholar

Bonell, Michael Joachim. ‘Formation of Contracts and Precontractual Liability under the Vienna Convention on International Sale of Goods’. In ICC (ed.), Formation des contrats et responsabilité précontractuelle (1990): 157–78.Google Scholar

Bonell, Michael Joachim. An International Restatement of Contract Law (Transnational Publishers, 1997).Google Scholar

Bonell, Michael Joachim. ‘The UNIDROIT Principles as a Means of Interpreting and Supplementing Uniform Law in International Arbitration Practice’. ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin Special Supplement (2002): 29–38.Google Scholar

Bonell, Michael Joachim. ‘The Law Governing International Commercial Contracts: Hard Law Versus Soft Law’. Volume 388 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2018).Google Scholar

Born, Gary. International Commercial Arbitration, 3rd ed. (Kluwer Law International 2021a).Google Scholar

Born, Gary. ‘Why It Is Especially Important that States Not Ratify the Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention Part I-II’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 21 and 23 July 2021b), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/07/23/why-it-is-especially-important-that-states-not-ratify-the-hague-choice-of-court-agreements-convention-part-i/.Google Scholar

Born, Gary. ‘Why States Should Not Ratify, and Should Instead Denounce, the Hague Choice-of-Court Agreements Convention Part I-III’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 16–18 June 2021c).Google Scholar

Brandão, Agatha, Gama, Lauro and Saumier, Geneviève. ‘The Effectiveness of International Legal Harmonization Through Soft Law (With a Focus on the UCP 600)’. General Report presented at the XXI Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law (Intersentia, forthcoming 2024).Google Scholar

Bridge, Michael. ‘Good Faith in Commercial Contracts’. In Brownsword, Roger, Hird, Norma J. and Howells, Geraint (eds.), Good Faith in Contract (Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1999): 139–64.Google Scholar

Bridge, Michael. ‘Good Faith and the Common Law’. Uniform Law Review 22.1 (2017): 98–115.Google Scholar

Bridge, Michael. ‘The Exercise of Contractual Discretion’. Law Quarterly Review 135.2 (2019): 227–48.Google Scholar

British Institute for International and Comparative Law. Study on the question of effectiveness of an assignment or subrogation of a claim against third parties and the priority of the assigned or subrogated claim over a right of another person (2014), https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fd808b79-725d-4ce3-95b0-599119e7fb8f.Google Scholar

Remiro, Brotóns Antonio. ‘La reconnaissance et l’exécution des sentences arbitrales étrangères’. Volume 184 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1984).Google Scholar

Brownsword, Roger. ‘Positive, Negative, Neutral: The Reception of Good Faith in English Contract Law’. In Brownsword, Roger, Hird, Norma J. and Howells, Geraint (eds.), Good Faith in Contract (Ashgate/Dartmouth, 1999): 13–40.Google Scholar

Brunner, Christoph and Gottlieb, Benjamin (eds.). Commentary on the UN Sales Law (CISG) (Kluwer Law International, 2019).Google Scholar

Buskerud Christoffersen, Margrethe. ‘Norwegian Law between Company Law and Civil Liability’. Oslo Law Review (forthcoming 2023).Google Scholar

Bussani, Mauro, and Mattei, Ugo. The Common Core of European Private Law (Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

Butler, Petra. ‘CISG and International Arbitration: A Fruitful Marriage?’ International Trade & Business Law Review 17 (2014): 322–57.Google Scholar

Cafaggi, Federico. ‘Self-Regulation in European Contract Law’. In Collins, Hugh (ed.), Standard Contract Terms in Europe: A Basis for and a Challenge to European Contract Law (Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar

Canuel, Edward T. ‘Comparing Exculpatory Clauses under Anglo-American Law: Testing Total Legal Convergence’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 80–103.Google Scholar

Carrington, Paul D. and Hagen, Paul H. ‘Contract and Jurisdiction’. The Supreme Court Review 8 (1997): 331–402.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Janeen M. The Transfer of Property in the Conflict of Laws (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Chedly, Lotfi. ‘L’efficacité de l’arbitrage commercial international’. Volume 400 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2019).Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh. ‘The Freedom to Circulate Documents: Regulating Contracts in Europe’. European Law Journal 10.6 (2004): 787–803.Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh. ‘Social Rights, General Clauses and the Acquis Communautaire’. In Grundmann, Stefan and Mazeaud, Denis (eds.), General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law (Kluwer Law International, 2006): 111–40.Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh (ed.). Standard Contract Terms in Europe: A Basis for and a Challenge to European Contract Law (Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar

Collins, Lawrence and Harris, Jonathan (eds.). Dicey, Morris and Collins on the Conflict of Laws, 4th Cumulative Supplement (Sweet & Maxwell, 2012 and 2019).Google Scholar

Commission on a European Contract Law, Study Group on a European Contract Law, Response to the Commission Communication by the Commission on European Contract Law and the Study Group on a European Civil Code, ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_int/safe_shop/fair_bus_pract/cont_law/comments/5.23.pdf.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. International Commercial Arbitration: Party Autonomy (Tano Aschehoug, 1999).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Tvangsfullbyrdelse av utenlandske voldgiftsavgjørelser’. Nytt i Privatretten 1 (2000): 15–16.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Between Private and Public International Law: Exorbitant Jurisdiction as Illustrated by the Yukos Case’. Review of Central and East European Law 32.1 (2007a): 1–17.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘The Function of Letters of Intent and Their Recognition in Modern Legal Systems’. In Schulze, Reiner (ed.), New Features in Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2007b): 139–59.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Arbitration and Private International Law’. International Arbitration Law Review 11.4 (2008a): 153–64.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Consumer Protection Except for Good Commercial Practice’. In Schulze, Reiner (ed.), CFR and Existing EC Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2008b): 78–94.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Commercial Arbitration and Investment Arbitration: Fertile Soil for False Friends?’ In Binder, Christina, Kriebaum, Ursula, Reinisch, August, and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford University Press, 2009): 782–800.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.). Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011a).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Does the Use of Common Law Contract Models Give Rise to a Tacit Choice of Law or to a Harmonised Transnational Interpretation?’ In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011b): 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Independence and Impartiality in International Adjudication: General Report’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Independence and Impartiality in International Adjudication (International Academy of Comparative Law, Intersentia, 2013), 1–66.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Limitations on Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration’. Volume 372 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2015).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Non-National Sources in International Commercial Arbitration and the Hidden Influence by National Traditions’. Scandinavian Studies in Law 63 (2016a): 23–44.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Detailed Contract Regulations and the UPICC: Parallels with National Law and Potential for Improvements: The Example of Norwegian Law’. In UNIDROIT (ed.), Eppur si muove: The Age of Uniform Law. Essays in Honour of Michael Joachim Bonell (UNIDROIT, 2016b): 1302–17.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘The Arbitral Tribunal’s Power in Respect of the Parties’ Pleadings as a Limit to Party Autonomy: On Jura Novit Curia and Related Issues’. In Ferrari, Franco (ed.), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris, 2016c): 289–330.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘The Importance of Legal Culture for Contract Construction: Norwegian Law, English Law and International Arbitration’. New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer, Volume 1 (New York State Bar Association, 2017): 39–41.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Detailed Contract Regulations and the UPICC: Parallels with National Law and Potential for Improvement: The Example of Norwegian Law’. In Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law (Springer, 2018a): 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘General Report on Jura Novit Arbiter’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta and Ferrari, Franco (eds.), Iura Novit Curia in International Arbitration (Juris, 2018b).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Inherent Powers and Competition Law’. In Ferrari, Franco and Rosenfeld, Friedrich (eds.), Inherent Powers in International Adjudication (Juris, 2018c): 297–325.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Soft Law as a Replacement or Corrective of National Law in Investment Arbitration?’ European International Arbitration Review 7.2 (2019): 201–16.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Reasons in Arbitral Awards and Court Control’. In Crivellaro, Antonio and Hodgson, Mélida N (eds.), Dossier XVIII: Explaining Why You Lost: Reasoning in Arbitration (ICC Institute of World Business, 2020a): 93–122.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Achmea’s Distinction between Investment and Commercial Arbitration’. In Calissendorff, Axel (ed.), The Future of Arbitration in Europe (Stockholm Centre for Commercial Law Skriftserie, 36, 2020b): 17–28.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘National Report, Norway: Due Process’. In Ferrari, Franco, Rosenfeld, Friedrich and Czernich, Dietmar (eds.), Due Process as a Limit to Discretion in International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2020c): 313–32.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘The Unidroit Principles: Long-Term Contracts’. In Galizzi, Pietro, Elgueta, Giacomo Rojas and Veneziano, Anna (eds.), The Multiple Uses of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: Theory and Practice (Giuffrè Francis Lefebvre, 2020d): 75–96.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘The Alleged Failure of Arbitration to Address Due Process Concerns: Is Arbitration under Attack?’ In Calissendorff, Axel and Schöldström, Patrik (eds.), Stockholm Arbitration Yearbook (Wolters Kluwer, 2021a).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. Internasjonal privatrett (Universitetsforlaget, 2021b).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Independence and Impartiality of International Adjudicators’. General Report presented at the XXI Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law (Intersentia, 2022).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Article V(2)(b)’. In Kronke, Herbert et al. (eds.), Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention, 2nd ed. (Kluwer Law International, forthcoming 2024).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and the Norwegian Transparency Act: The Importance of Choice of Law’. Oslo Law Review (forthcoming 2023).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. Corruption and Arbitration: Arbitrability, Jurisdiction, Admissibility or Mertis? (Liber Amicorum Bernardini, forthcoming 2024).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Delocalisation and Re-Localisation in Commercial Law and the Law of Arbitration: The Continued Relevance of F.A. Mann’s Thought’. In Danneman, Gerhard and Allen, Jason (eds.), Legal Aspects: The Life and Legacy of F.A. Mann (Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2024).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta. ‘Forstyrrelser i leveransekjeden, force majeure og kontrollansvaret’. Festskrift for Lasse Simonsen (forthcoming 2023).Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta and Behn, Daniel. ‘The Relevance of the UNIDROIT Principles in Investment Arbitration’. Uniform Law Review 19.4 (2014): 570–608.Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, Giuditta and Behn, Daniel. ‘Arbitration and the Development of Law’. In Kröll, Stephan, Bjorklund, Andrea and Ferrari, Franco (eds.), Cambridge Compendium of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration (Cambridge University Press, 2023).Google Scholar

Cremades, Bernardo and Cairns, David J. A. ‘Transnational Public Policy in International Arbitral Decision-Making: The Cases of Bribery, Money Laundering and Fraud’. ICC Institute Dossiers (2003): 65–92.Google Scholar

Crivellaro, Antonio. ‘Arbitrato internazionale e corruzione’. Rivista dell’Arbitrato (2019): 663–707.Google Scholar

Crivellaro, Antonio and Hodgson Mélida, N. (eds.). Dossier XVIII: Explaining Why You Lost: Reasoning in Arbitration (ICC Institute of World Business, 2020).Google Scholar

Cuniberti, Gilles. ‘Three Theories of Lex Mercatoria’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52 (2013): 369.Google Scholar

Lauro, da Gama. ‘Les principes d’UNIDROIT et la loi régissant les contrats de commerce’. Volume 406 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2020).Google Scholar

Dannemann, Gerhard. ‘Common Law Based Contracts under German law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 62–79.Google Scholar

Dasser, Felix. Internationale Schiedsgerichte und lex mercatoria: Rechtsvergleichender Beitrag zur Diskussion über ein nicht-staatliches Handelsrecht (Schulthess Polygraph. Verlag, 1989).Google Scholar

Dasser, Felix. ‘Soft Law in International Commercial Arbitration’. Volume 402 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2019).Google Scholar

de Boeck, Annuck and van Hoecke, Mark. ‘The Interpretation of Standard Clauses in European Contract Law’. In Collins, Hugh (ed.), Standard Contract Terms in Europe: A Basis for and a Challenge to European Contract Law (Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar

de Boer, Ted M. ‘Choice of Law in Arbitration Proceedings’. Volume 375 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2015).Google Scholar

Filip, De Ly. International Business Law and Lex Mercatoria (Elsevier Science Ltd, 1992).Google Scholar

Giorgio, De Nova. ‘The Romanistic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Italian Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 227–32.Google Scholar

Derains, Yves, and Schwartz, Eric A. A Guide to the ICC Rules of Arbitration, 2nd ed. (Kluwer Law International, 2005).Google Scholar

Echenberg, David. ‘Negotiating International Contracts: Does the Process Invite a Review of Standard Contracts from the Point of View of National Legal Requirements’. In Cordero-Moss, Guiditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 11–19.Google Scholar

Eidenmuller, Horst G. M., Faust, Florian, Grigoleit, Hans Christoph, Jansen, Nils, Wagner, Gerhard and Zimmermann, Reinhard. ‘The Common Frame of Reference for European Private Law: Policy Choices and Codification Problems’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28.4 (2008): 659–708.Google Scholar

European Group for Private International Law (GEDIP/EGPIL). Recommendation of the European Group for Private International Law (GEDIP/EGPIL) to the European Commission concerning the Private international law aspects of the future Instrument of the European Union on [Corporate Due Diligence and Corporate Accountability], adopted on 8 October 2021 and updated in 2022. https://gedip-egpil.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Recommandation-GEDIP-Recommendation-EGPIL-final-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Felemegas, John. ‘Comparative Editorial Remarks on the Concept of Good Faith in the CISG and the PECL’. Pace International Law Review 13 (2001): 399.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco (ed.). The CISG and its Impact on National Legal Systems (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2008).Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco (ed.). Limits to Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration (Juris, 2016a).Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco. ‘How International Should International Arbitration Be?’ Eppur si muove: The Age of Uniform Law: Essays in Honour of Michael Joachim Bonell (UNIDROIT, 2016b): 847–55.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco. ‘Autonomous Interpretation Versus Homeward Trend Versus Outward Trend in CISG Case Law’. Uniform Law Review 22.1 (2017): 244–57.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco. ‘The Role of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in Determining the Law Applicable to the Merits in Commercial Arbitration’. European Investment Law and Arbitration Review 7 (2018): 87–99.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco. ‘Plures leges faciunt arbitrum’. Arbitration International 37.3 (2021): 579–97.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco and Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (eds.), Iura Novit Curia in International Arbitration (Juris, 2018).Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco and Gillette, Clayton P. International Sales Law (Edward Elgar, 2017).Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco, Gillette, Clayton P., Tosello, Marco, Walt, Steven D. ‘The Inappropriate Use of the PICC to Interpret Hardship Claims under the CISG’. Internationales Handelsrecht 3 (2017): 97–102.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco and Kröll, Stefan (eds.). Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration, 2nd ed. (Juris, 2019).Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco and Rosenfeld, Friedrich (eds.). Inherent Powers in International Adjudication (Juris, 2018).Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco, Rosenfeld, Friedrich and Czernich, Dietmar. Due Process as a Limit to Discretion in International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2020).Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco and Silberman, Linda. ‘Getting to the Law Applicable to the Merits in International Arbitration and the Consequences for Getting It Wrong’. In Ferrari, Franco and Kröll, Stefan (eds.), Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration, 2nd ed. (Juris, 2019): 371–442.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Franco and Simowitz, Aaron D. Forum Shopping and International Commercial Law (Edward Elgar, 2020).Google Scholar

Ferreri, Silvia. XVII Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law. The Italian National Report Section II-B1 (Private International Law, 2006).Google Scholar

Financial Market Law Committee, Duties of Good Faith in Wholesale Financial Contracts, November 2022, http://fmlc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Duties-of-Good-Faith-in-Wholesale-Financial-Contracts.pdf.Google Scholar

Flambouras, Dionysios P. ‘The Doctrines of Impossibility of Performance and Clausula Rebus Sic Stantibus in the 1980 Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Principles of European Contract Law: A Comparative Analysis’. Pace International Law Review 13 (2001): 261–93.Google Scholar

Flessner, Alix and Verhagen, Hendrik. Assignment in European Private International Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2006).Google Scholar

Fontaine, Marcel and De Ly, Filip. Drafting International Contracts. (Brill, 2006): 629.Google Scholar

Fouchard, Philippe and Goldman, Berthold. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 1999).Google Scholar

Fountoulakis, Christiana. ‘The Parties’ Choice of Neutral Law in International Sales Contracts’. European Journal of Law Reform 7 (2006): 303–29.Google Scholar

Frydlinger, David et al. ‘Unpacking Relational Contracts’. Thaslam College of Business. www.vestedway.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Unpacking-Relational-Contracting_v19.pdf.Google Scholar

Gaillard, Emmanuel. ‘L’effet négatif de la compétence-compétence’. In Haldy, Jacques, Rapp, Jean-Marc and Ferrari, Phidias (eds.), Etudes de procédure et d’arbitrage en l’honneur de Jean-François Poudret (Faculté de droit de l’Université de Lausanne, 1999): 387–402.Google Scholar

Gaillard, Emmanuel. ‘Aspects philosophiques du droit de l’arbitrage international’. Volume 329 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2007).Google Scholar

Gaillard, Emmanuel and Savage, John (eds.). Fouchard, Gaillard and Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2004).Google Scholar

Gaja, Giorgio. ‘Sulle norme applicabili al merito secondo la nuova disciplina dell’arbitrato internazionale’. In Rivista dell’Arbitrato (Giuffre, 1994): 433.Google Scholar

Galizzi, Pietro, Elgueta, Giacomo Rojas and Veneziano, Anna (eds.). The Multiple Uses of the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: Theory and Practice (Giuffrè Francis Lefebvre, 2020).Google Scholar

Gambaro, Antonio and Sacco, Rodolfo. Sistemi giuridici comparati (Utet, 2002).Google Scholar

Garro, Alejandro M. ‘Exemption of Liability for Damages under Article 79 of the CISG’. CISG-Advisory Council Opinion No. 7 (2007), https://cisgac.com/opinions/cisgac-opinion-no1-copy/.Google Scholar

Giardina, Andrea. ‘La legge n. 25 del 1994 e l’arbitrato internazionale’. Rivista dell’Arbitrato (Giuffre, 1994).Google Scholar

Girsberger, Daniel, Graziano, Thomas Kadner and Neels, Jan L. (eds.). Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts: Comparative Commentary on the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts (Oxford University Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Giuliano, Mario and Lagarde, Paul. Report on the Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations, 1980 OJ C 282. (‘Giuliano–Lagarde Report’) (1980).Google Scholar

Glavanits, Judit. ‘How Do You Mean It, CISG? Applying the CISG More “21st Century”-Way’. In UNCITRAL, Modernizing International Trade Law to Support Innovation and Sustainable Development, Volume 4 (Proceedings of the Congress of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 2017): 331–8.Google Scholar

Goldman, Berthold. ‘Les conflits de lois dans l’arbitrage international de droit privé’. Volume 109 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1963).Google Scholar

Goldman, Berthold. ‘Frontières du droit et lex mercatoria’. Archives de philosophie du droit 9 (1964): 177.Google Scholar

Goldman, Berthold. ‘La lex mercatoria dans les contrats et l’arbitrage internationaux: réalité et perspectives’. Travaux du Comité français de droit international privé 2.1977 (1980): 221–70.Google Scholar

Goldman, Berthold. ‘Lex Mercatoria’. Forum Internationale 3 (1983): 3.Google Scholar

Goldman, Berthold. ‘The Applicable Law: General Principles of Law: The Lex Mercatoria’. Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration (Springer, 1987): 113–25.Google Scholar

Goldman, Berthold. ‘Nouvelles réflexions sur la lex mercatoria’. In Dominicé, Christian, Patry, Robert and Reymond, Claude (eds.), Etudes de droit international en l’honneur de Pierre Lalive (Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1993): 241.Google Scholar

Goode, Roy. ‘Usage and Its Reception in Transnational Commercial Law’. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 46.1 (1997): 1–36.Google Scholar

Goode, Roy, Kronke, Herbert and McKendrick, Ewan. Transnational Commercial Law: Texts, Cases and Materials, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Gordley, James. The Philosophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine (Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Gorton, Lars. ‘The Nordic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Swedish Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 276–301.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, Eckart, Michaels, Ralf, Rühl, Giesela and von Hein, Jan (eds.). Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 153–83. Also available as CLPE Research Paper 4/2007 at http://comparativeresearch.net/ and at http://ssrn.com/abstract=921842.Google Scholar

Graziadei, Michele. ‘Variations on the Concept of Contract in a European Perspective: Some Unresolved Issues’. In Schulze, Reiner (ed.), New Features in Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2007): 311–24.Google Scholar

Grigera Naón, Horacio. ‘Choice-of-Law Problems in International Commercial Arbitration’. Volume 289 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2001).Google Scholar

Grosheide, Willem. ‘The Duty to Deal Fairly in Commercial Contracts’. In Grundmann, Stefan and Mazeaud, Denis (eds.), General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law. Comparative Law, EC Law and Contract Law Codification, Volume 6 (Kluwer Law International, 2006): 197–204.Google Scholar

Grundmann, Stefan and Mazeaud, Denis (eds.). General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law: Comparative Law, EC Law and Contract Law Codification, Volume 6 (Kluwer Law International, 2006).Google Scholar

Hagstrøm, Viggo. ‘The Nordic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Norwegian Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 265–75.Google Scholar

Hagstrøm, Viggo. Obligasjonsrett, 3rd ed. (Universitetsforlaget, 2021).Google Scholar

Hanotiau, Bernard. ‘The Law Applicable to Arbitrability’. In van den Berg, Albert (ed.), 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, The Hague etc. (ICCA Congress Series, No 9, 1999): 146–67.Google Scholar

Hartley, Trevor C. ‘Mandatory Rules in International Contracts: The Common Law Approach’. Volume 266 (Recueil des Cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1997).Google Scholar

Hartley, Trevor. ‘Is the Hague Choice-of-Court Agreements Convention Really a Threat to Justice and Fair Play? A Reply to Gary Born’ (EAPIL Blog, 30 June 2021), https://eapil.org/2021/06/30/is-the-2005-hague-choice-of-court-convention-really-a-threat-to-justice-and-fair-play-a-reply-to-gary-born/.Google Scholar

Hascher, Dominique. ‘Principes et pratique de procédure dans l’arbitrage commercial international’. Volume 279 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1999).Google Scholar

Hay, Peter, Borchers, Patrick, Symeonides, Symeon C. and Whytock, Christopher A. Conflict of Laws, 6th ed. (West Academic Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar

Hepburn, Jarrod. ‘The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Limited Relationship’. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 64.4 (2015): 905–33.Google Scholar

Hess, Burkhard and Pfeiffer, Thomas. Interpretation of the public policy exception as referred to in EU instruments of private international and procedural law. (EU Directorate General for Internal Policies Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs 2011): 143. www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/it/document.html?reference=IPOL-JURI_ET%282011%29453189.Google Scholar

Heuman, Lars. Current Issues in Swedish Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 1990).Google Scholar

Heuman, Lars. Skiljemannarätt (Norstedts juridik, 1999).Google Scholar

Heuman, Lars. Arbitration Law of Sweden: Practice and Procedure (Juris, 2003).Google Scholar

Heuman, Lars and Jarvin, Sigvard. The Swedish Arbitration Act of 1999, Five Years On: A Critical Review of Strengths and Weaknesses (JurisNet, 2006).Google Scholar

Hobér, Kaj. ‘Arbitration Involving States’. In Newman, Lawrence W. and Hill, Richard D. (eds.), The Leading Arbitrator’s Guide to International Arbitration (Juris, 2004).Google Scholar

Honsell, Heinrich, Vogt, Nedim Peter, Schnyder, Anton. K. and Berti, Stephen V. (eds.). Basler Kommentar Internationales Privatrecht, 2nd ed. (Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, 2007).Google Scholar

Huding-van Lennep, W. ‘Anticipatory Application of a Multilateral Treaty with Uniform Conflict Rules’. Netherlands International Law Review 42.2 (1995): 259ff.Google Scholar

Institute of International Law, Deliberations of the XVIII Commission of the Institute of International Law, Yearbook – Institute of International Law I (1989): 173.Google Scholar

International Bar Association (IBA). Subcommittee on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Report on the Public Policy Exception in the New York Convention (2015) https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Link/Document/Blob/Icc585ac3773d11e598dc8b09b4f043e0.pdf?targetType=PLC-multimedia&originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentImage&uniqueId=b783c322-c20e-4d78-8cd6-80bce5136e85&ppcid=d99f1dae999247d49fb.Google Scholar

International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Department of Policy and Business Practices Document 15 October 2001, Response to the Commission Communication by the Commission on European Contract Law and the Study Group on a European Civil Code, AH/dhh Doc. 373/416.Google Scholar

International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), ICC Commission Report: States, state entities and ICC arbitration, 2012, https://iccwbo.org/publication/arbitration-involving-states-state-entities-icc-rules-arbitration-report-icc-commission-arbitration-adr-spanish-version/.Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration I (Kluwer International, 1976).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration II (Kluwer International, 1977).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration VII (Kluwer International, 1982).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration IX (Kluwer International, 1984).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XI (Kluwer International, 1986).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XV (Kluwer International, 1990).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XX (Kluwer International, 1995).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXII (Kluwer International, 1997).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXIII (Kluwer International, 1998).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXV (Kluwer International, 2000).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXIX (Kluwer International, 2004).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXX (Kluwer International, 2005).Google Scholar

International Council for Commercial Arbitration. ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook for Judges (2011).Google Scholar

International Law Association (ILA), Committee on International Commercial Arbitration. International Law Association Interim Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards (Paper presented at the International Law Association Conference, London, 2000).Google Scholar

International Law Association (ILA), Final Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards (Paper presented at the International Law Association Conference, New Delhi, 2002).Google Scholar

International Law Association (ILA), Committee on International Commercial Arbitration. Final Report Ascertaining the Contents of the Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration (Paper presented at the International Law Association Conference, Rio de Janeiro, 2008).Google Scholar

International Law Commission (ILC), Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission: Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law (2006a), available at https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l702.pdf.Google Scholar

International Law Commission (ILC), Conclusions of the work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Adopted by the International Law Commission at its Fifty-eighth session (2006b), available at https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/1_9_2006.pdf.Google Scholar

International Law Commission (ILC). First Report on General Principles of Law, adopted at the Commission’s Seventy-first session of 29 April–7 June and 8 July–9 August (2019).Google Scholar

Jacquet, Jean-Michel. ‘Droit international privé et arbitrage commercial international’. Volume 396 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2019).Google Scholar

Jansen, Nils and Zimmermann, Reinhard. ‘“A European Civil Code in All But Name”: Discussing the Nature and Purposes of the Draft Common Frame of Reference’. The Cambridge Law Journal 69.1 (2010): 98–112.Google Scholar

Jänterä-Jareborg, Maarit. ‘Foreign Law in National Courts: A Comparative Perspective’. (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, Volume 304, 2004).Google Scholar

Jault-Seseke, Fabienne. ‘Transparency Legislation in Selected European Countries’. Oslo Law Review (forthcoming 2023).Google Scholar

Jhering, Rudolf. ‘Culpa in contrahendo oder Schadensersatz bei nichtigen oder nicht zur Perfection gelangten Vertragen’. Jherings Jahrbücher 4.1 (1861).Google Scholar

Judiciary of England and Wales, Commercial Court Report 2020–2021, www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/14.50_Commercial_Court_Annual_Report_2020_21_WEB.pdf.Google Scholar

Juenger, Friedrich K. Choice of Law and Multistate Justice (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993).Google Scholar

Jung, Helena. ‘SCC Practice: Challenges to Arbitrators’, SCC Board decisions 2005–2007, www.sccinstitute.com/filearchive/2/28190/04-Art32-Jung.pdf.Google Scholar

Junita, Fifi. ‘Public Policy Exception in International Commercial Arbitration: Promoting Uniform Model Norms’. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 5 (2012): 45.Google Scholar

Kadner Graziano, Thomas. ‘The Hague Solution on Choice-of-Law Clauses in Conflicting Standard Terms: Paving the Way to More Legal Certainty in International Commercial Transactions?’ Uniform Law Review 22.2 (2017): 351–68.Google Scholar

Kahn, Rudolf. ‘Arbitration in England and Germany’. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law 12.1 (1930): 58–78.Google Scholar

Karton, Joshua. ‘The Arbitral Role in Contractual Interpretation’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 6 (2015): 4.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle. ‘Iura novit arbiter: Est-ce bien raisonnable? Reflexions sur le statut du droit de fond devant l’arbitre international’. In Heritier, A. and Hirsch, L. (eds.), De lege ferenda: Eeflexions sur le droit desirable en l’honneur du professeur Alain Hirsch (Editions Slatkine, 2004).Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle. ‘The Arbitrator and the Law: Does He/She Know It? Apply It? How? And a Few More Questions’. Arbitration International 21.4 (2005): 631–8.Google Scholar

Kegel, Gerhard. ‘The Crisis of Conflict of Laws’. Volume 112 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1964).Google Scholar

Kessedjian, Catherine. ‘Principes de la Contradiction et Arbitrage’. Revue de l’arbitrage 3 (1995): 381–426.Google Scholar

Kessedjian, Catherine and Rivera, Humberto Cantú (eds.). Private International Law Aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility (Springer, 2020).Google Scholar

Knuts, Gisela. ‘Jura Novit Curia and the Right to Be Heard: An Analysis of Recent Case Law’. Arbitration International 28.4 (2012): 669–88.Google Scholar

Komarov, Alexander S. ‘Reference to the UNIDROIT Principles in International Commercial Arbitration Practice in the Russian Federation’. Uniform Law Review 16 (2011): 657.Google Scholar

Kondring, Jörg. ‘“Der Vertrag ist das Recht der Parteien”: Zur Verwirklichung des Parteiwillens durch nachträgliche Teilrechtswahl’. IPRax: Praxis des Internationalen Privat-und Verfahrensrechts 26.5 (2006): 425–38.Google Scholar

Konow, Berte Elen. Løsørepant over landegrenser (Fagbokforlaget, 1999).Google Scholar

Kreindler, Richard. ‘Corruption in International Investment Arbitration: Jurisdiction and the Unclean Hands Doctrine’. In Binder, Christina, Kriebaum, Ursula, Reinisch, August and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christopf Schreuer (Oxford University Press, 2009): 309–27.Google Scholar

Kreindler, Richard. ‘Competence–Competence in the Face of Illegality in Contracts and Arbitration Agreements’. Volume 361 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2013).Google Scholar

Kritzer, Albert H. ‘Pre-Contract Formation’. Editorial Remark on the Internet Database of the Institute of International Commercial Law of the Pace University School of Law, CISG Database, https://iicl.law.pace.edu/cisg/cisg (2008).Google Scholar

Kronke, Herbert, Nacimiento, Patricia and Otto, Dirk. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention (Kluwer Law International, 2010, second edition forthcoming 2024).Google Scholar

Kropholler, Jan. Internationales Privatrecht, 6th ed. (Mohr Siebeck, 2006).Google Scholar

Kühn, Gisela and Yip, Man. ‘New Specialised Commercial Courts and Their Role’. Cross-Border Litigation, General Report XXI, XXI Congress AIDC Asuncion (to be published by Intersentia, 2022).Google Scholar

Kurkela, Matti. ‘Jura Novit Curia and the Burden of Education in International Arbitration-A Nordic Perspective’. ASA Bulletin 21 (2003): 486.Google Scholar

Lagarde, Xavier, Meheut, David, and Reversac, Jean-Michel. ‘The Romanistic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under French Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 210–26.Google Scholar

Lalive, Pierre. ‘Problèmes relatifs a l’arbitrage international commercial’. Volume 120 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1967).Google Scholar

Lalive, Pierre. ‘Truly International Public Policy and International Arbitration’. In Sanders, Pieter (ed.), Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration, ICCA Congress Series, Volume 3 (Kluwer Law International, 1987).Google Scholar

Lalive, Pierre. ‘L’ordre public transnational et l’arbitre international’. In Bariatti, S. and Venturini, G. (eds.), Liber Fausto Pocar (Giuffre, 2009): 599–611.Google Scholar

Lando, Ole. ‘The Lex Mercatoria in International Commercial Arbitration’. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 34.4 (1985): 747–68.Google Scholar

Lando, Ole. ‘The Law Applicable to the Merits of the Dispute’. Arbitration International 2.2 (1986): 104–15.Google Scholar

Lando, Ole. ‘Lex mercatoria 1985–1996’. In Frändberg, Åke and Göranson, Ulf (eds.), Festskrift til Stig Strömholm (Iustus Forlag, 1997).Google Scholar

Lando, Ole. ‘CISG and Its Followers: A Proposal to Adopt Some International Principles of Contract Law’. The American Journal of Comparative Law 53 (2005): 379.Google Scholar

Lando, Ole and Beale, Hugh (eds.). Principles of European Contract Law: Parts I and II (Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Lando, Ole, Prum, Andre, Clive, Eric and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.). Principles of European Contract Law: Part III (Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

Lew, Julian D. M. Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration: A Study in Commercial Arbitration Awards (Oceana Publications, 1978).Google Scholar

Liukkunen, Ulla. ‘Lex Mercatoria in International Arbitration’. In Klabbers, Jan and Piiparinen, Touko (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law: Exploring Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2013): 201–28.Google Scholar

Llamzon, Aloysius. ‘On Corruption’s Peremptory Treatment in International Arbitration’. In Baizeau, Domitille and Kreindler, Richard H. (eds.), Addressing Issues of Corruption in Commercial and Investment Arbitration (Dossiers of the ICC Institute of World Business Law, 2015): 32–50.Google Scholar

Lookofsky, Joseph. International privatrett på formuerettens område (Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 1997).Google Scholar

Luzzato, Riccardo. ‘International Commercial Arbitration and the Municipal Law of States’. Volume 157 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1977).Google Scholar

Macaulay, Stewart. ‘Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study’. American Sociological Review 28.1 (1963): 55–67.Google Scholar

McKendrick, Ewan, ‘Harmonisation of European Contract Law: The State We Are In’. In Vogenauer, Stefan and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.), The Harmonisation of European Contract Law (Hart Publishing, 2006): 5–29.Google Scholar

Macneil, Ian R. ‘Whither Contracts?’ Journal of Legal Education 21 (1969): 403–418.Google Scholar

Macneil, Ian R. ‘The Many Futures of Contracts’. Southern California Law Review 47.3 (1974a): 691–816.Google Scholar

Macneil, Ian R. ‘Restatement (Second) of Contracts and Presentation’. Virginia Law Review 60 (1974b): 589.Google Scholar

Macneil, Ian R. ‘Contracts: Adjustment of Long-Term Economic Relations under Classical, Neoclassical, and Relational Contract Law’. Northwestern University Law Review 72 (1977): 854.Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich. Staudingers Kommentarzum Burgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einfuhrungsgesetz und Nebegesetzen, Einleitung zu, §§ 27ff EGBGB, §§ 27–33 EGBGB etc. (Sellier de Gruyter, 2002).Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich. ‘Comparative Editorial Remarks on the Provisions Regarding Good Faith in CISG Article 8 (1) and the UNIDROIT Principles Article 1.7’. In Felemegas, John (ed.), An International Approach to the Interpretation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (1980) as Uniform Sales Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich. ‘Remarks on Good Faith: The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law, Principles of International Commercial Contracts’. Pace International Law Review 10 (1998): 89.Google Scholar

Magnus, Ulrich. ‘The Germanic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under German Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 179–209.Google Scholar

Mance, Jonathan. ‘Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law?’ European Business Law Review 18 (2007): 77–99.Google Scholar

Mann, Fritz A. ‘Lex facit arbitrum’. In Saunders, Pieter (ed.), Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff, 1967): 157.Google Scholar

Mann, Fritz Alexander. ‘Sonderanknüpfung und zwingendes Recht im internationalem Privatrecht’. In Sandrock, Otto (ed.), Festsschrift für Günther Beitzke zum 70. Geburtstag (De Grutyer, 1979).Google Scholar

Mario, Giuliano and Paul, Lagarde, Report on the Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (1980) OJ (C 282) 1–50.Google Scholar

Martinek, Martin. ‘Die Mitwirkungsverweigerung des Schiedsbeklagten’. In Lüke, Gerhard, Mikami, Takehiko and Prutting, Hanns (eds.), Festschrift fur Akira Ishikawa zum 70. Geburtstag (De Gruyter, 2001).Google Scholar

Mayer, Pierre. ‘L’autonomie de l’arbitre international dans l’appréciation de sa propre competence’. Volume 217 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1989).Google Scholar

Mayer, Pierre. ‘Le pouvoir des arbitres de régler la procédure: Une analyse comparative des systèmes de ‘civil law’et de ‘common law’. Revue de L’Arbitrage 2 (1995): 163–84.Google Scholar

Mbengue, Makane Moïse and Charlotin, Damien. ‘The Independence and Impartiality of Adjudicators in the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), ‘Independence and Impartiality of International Adjudicators’. General Report presented at the XXI Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law’ (Intersentia, forthcoming 2023).Google Scholar

Menyhard, Attila. ‘The East European Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Hungarian Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 302–28.Google Scholar

Merkin, Robert. Arbitration Law (Laforma Law, 2004).Google Scholar

Michaels, Ralf. ‘Non-State Law in the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’. In Purnhagen, Kai and Rott, Peter (eds.), Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation: Liber Amicorum for Hans Micklitz (Springer Verlag, 2014).Google Scholar

Mikelsen, Anders B. Hindringsfritak. Det såkalte kontrollansvaret i kjøpsloven § 27 (Gyldendal, 2011).Google Scholar

Millet-Einbinder, Martine. ‘Writing off Tax Deductibility’. OECD Observer (April 2000), www.oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/245/Writing_off_tax_deductibility_.html.Google Scholar

Møgelvang-Hansen, Peter. ‘The Nordic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Danish Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 233–53.Google Scholar

Möller, Gustaf. ‘The Nordic Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Finnish Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 254–64.Google Scholar

Mustill, Michael, ‘The New Lex Mercatoria: The First Twenty-five Years’. Arbitration International 4 (1988): 86.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Peter Arnt. International privat- og procesret (Jurist- og okonomiforbundets forlag, 1997).Google Scholar

Pålsson, Lennart. Romkonventionen: tillämplig lag för avtalsförpliktelser, Volume 162 (Norstedts juridik, 1998).Google Scholar

Park, William W. Arbitration of International Business Disputes, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Park, William W. ‘A Fair Fight: Professional Guidelines in International Arbitration’. Arbitration International 30.3 (2014a): 409–28.Google Scholar

Park, William W. ‘The Predictability Paradox: Arbitrators and Applicable Law’. In Bortolotti, Fabio and Mayer, Pierre (eds.), The Application of Substantive Law by International Arbitration (ICC Dossiers, 2014b): 60–79.Google Scholar

Park, William W. ‘Annulled Arbitration Awards’. In Bédard, Julie, and Pearsall, Patrick W. (eds.), Reflections on International Arbitration: Essays in Honour of George Bermann (Juris, 2022): 641–52.Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan. ‘Arbitration Unbound: Award Detached from the Law of Its Country of Origin’. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 30.2 (1981): 358–87.Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan. ‘Delocalisation of International Commercial Arbitration: When and Why It Matters’. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 32.1 (1983): 53–61.Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan. ‘Arbitration without Privity’. ICSID Review 10.2 (1995): 232–57.Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan. ‘Rediscovering the NY Convention: Further Reflections on Chromalloy’. Mealey’s International Arbitration Report 17.4 (1997): 34.Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan. ‘May or Must Under the New York Convention: An Exercise in Syntax and Linguistics’. Arbitration International 14.2 (1998): 227–30.Google Scholar

Peel, Edwin. ‘The Common Law Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under English Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Guiditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press 2011): 129–78.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, Gless, Sabine, Tomale, Chris and Weller, Marc-Philippe. Business and Human Rights: Making the Legally Binding Instrument Work in Public, Private and Criminal Law. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law Research Paper Series No. 2020–06 (2020).Google Scholar

Philip, Alan. ‘First Danish Decisions on the Rome Convention’. IPRax (1994): 150.Google Scholar

Portmann, Wolfgang, Waas, Bernd and van Voss, Guus Heerma. Restatement of Labour Law in Europe, Volume I (Hart Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar

Ilaria, Pretelli. Le droit européen des successions Commentaire du Règlement n°650/2012 du 4 juillet 2012, 2nd ed. (Bruylant, 2016).Google Scholar

Radicati Di Brozolo, Luca G. ‘Arbitration and Competition Law: The Position of the Courts and of Arbitrators’. Arbitration International 27.1 (2011): 1–26.Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, Luca. ‘Mandatory Rules and International Arbitration’. American Review of International Arbitration 23 (2012): 49–74.Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, Luca. ‘Arbitrage commercial international et lois de police. Considérations sur les conflits de juridictions dans le commerce international’. Volume 315 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2015).Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, Luca. ‘Party Autonomy and the Rules Governing the Merits’. In Ferrari, Franco (ed.), Limits to Party Autonomy in International Arbitration (Juris, 2016).Google Scholar

Ramberg, Christina. ‘The Duty to Renegotiate an International Sales Contract under CISG in Case of Hardship and the Use of the UNIDROIT Principles’. European Review of Private Law 19(1) (2011): 101–54.Google Scholar

Rau, Alan Scott. ‘The Allocation of Power between Arbitral Tribunals and State Courts’. Volume 390 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2018).Google Scholar

Redfern, Alan, Hunter, Martin, Blackaby, Nigel, Partasides, Constantine. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Reese, Willis L. M. ‘Dépeçage: A Common Phenomenon in Choice of Law’. Columbia Law Review 73 (1973): 58.Google Scholar

Research Group on the Existing EC Private Law (Acquis Group), Principles of the Existing EC Contract Law (Acquis Principles) – Contract II: General Provisions, Delivery of Goods, Package Travel and Payment Services (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar

Reymond, Claude. ‘Civil Law and Common Law Procedures: Which is the More Inquisitorial? A Civil Lawyer’s Response’. Arbitration International 5.4 (1989): 357–68.Google Scholar

Ribeiro-Bidaoui, João. ‘Hailing the HCCH (Hague) 2005 Choice of Court Convention, A Response to Gary Born’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 21 July 2021), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/07/21/hailing-the-hcch-hague-2005-choice-of-court-convention-a-response-to-gary-born/.Google Scholar

Ritaine, Eleanor Cashin. ‘Editorial’ in ISDC Letter 7 (2005).Google Scholar

Rogers, Cathrine. ‘The International Arbitrator Information Project: An Idea Whose Time Has Come’. (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 9 August 2012), kluwerarbitrationblog.com/.Google Scholar

Rowan, Solène. ‘The New French Law of Contract’. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 66.4 (2017): 805–31.Google Scholar

Rozas, José and Fernández, Carlos. ‘Le rôle des juridictions étatiques devant l’arbitrage commercial international’. Volume 290 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 2001).Google Scholar

Rubins, Noah. ‘Observations on CME v. Czech Republic’. Stockholm Arbitration Report 2 (2003): 208.Google Scholar

Rubins, Noah. ‘“Observations” in Connection with Swembalt v. Republic of Latvia’. Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce. Stockholm Arbitration Report 2 (2004).Google Scholar

Sampliner, Gary H. ‘Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards after Annulment in Their Country of Origin’. Mealey’s International Arbitration Report 11.9 (1996): 22–34.Google Scholar

Sanchez, Jose F. ‘Applying the Model Law’s Standard for Interim Measures in International Arbitration’. Journal of International Arbitration 37.1 (2020): 49–86.Google Scholar

Sanders, Pieter. ‘Trends in the Field of International Commercial Arbitration’. Volume 145 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1975).Google Scholar

Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. System des heutigen römischen Rechts. Achter Band. (Veit, 1849).Google Scholar

Schlechtriem, Peter. Good Faith in German Law and in International Uniform Laws (Pace Law School Institute of International Commercial Law, 1997).Google Scholar

Schlechtriem, Peter. ‘The Functions of General Clauses, Exemplified by Regarding Germanic Laws and Dutch Law’. In Grundmann, Stefan and Mazeaud, Denis (eds.), General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law (Aspen Publishers, 2006): 41–55.Google Scholar

Schlechtriem, Peter. Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG), 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Schlechtriem, Peter. Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG). 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2022).Google Scholar

Schmitthoff, Clive M. ‘The Unification of the Law of International Trade’. Journal of Business Law, Annual Issue (1968): 105.Google Scholar

Schneider, Michael E. ‘Combining Arbitration with Conciliation’. International Dispute Resolution: Towards an International Arbitration Culture, ICCA Congress Series No. 8, Volume 57 (Kluwer Law International, 1998).Google Scholar

Schneider, Michael. ‘Combining Arbitration with Conciliation’. Oil, Gas and Energy Law Intelligence 1.2 (2003): 4.Google Scholar

School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary University of London. 2010 International Arbitration Survey: Choices in International Arbitration (2010).Google Scholar

School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary University of London. 2012 International Arbitration Survey: Current and Preferred Practices in the Arbitral Process (2012).Google Scholar

School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary University of London and White & Case. 2015 International Arbitration Survey Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitration (2015).Google Scholar

School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary University of London and White & Case. 2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration (2018).Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph. ‘Failure to Apply the Governing Law in International Investment Arbitration’. Austrian Review of International and European Law Online 7.1 (2004a): 147–95.Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph. ‘Three Generations of ICSID Annulment Proceedings’. In Gaillard, Emmanuel and Banifatemi, Yas (eds.), Annulment of ICSID Awards (IAI Series on International Arbitration, 2004b).Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims: The Vivendi I Case Considered’. In Weiler, Todd (ed.), Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (Cameron May, 2005).Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph, Malintoppi, Loretta, Reinisch, August and Sinclair, Anthony. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Schulze, Reiner (ed.). New Features in Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2007).Google Scholar

Schulze, Reiner (ed.). CFR and Existing EC Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2008).Google Scholar

Schwenzer, Ingeborg, Pascal, Hachem and Kee, Christopher. Global Sales and Contract Law (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Schwenzer, Ingeborg and Schroeter, Ulrich G. (eds.). Schlechtriem & Schwenzer Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG), 5th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2022).Google Scholar

Seidl-Hohenveledern, Ignaz. ‘International Economic “Soft Law”’. Volume 163 (Recueil des cours, Académie de Droit International de la Haye, 1979).Google Scholar

Seraglini, Christophe. ‘L’influence de la culture juridique sur la decision de l’arbitre’. Mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Pierre Mayer (LGDJ, 2015): 817–31.Google Scholar

Seraglini, Christophe and Ortscheidt, Jérôme. Droit de l’arbitrage interne et international, 2nd ed. (Domat Montchrestien, 2019).Google Scholar

Sheppard, Audley. ‘Public Policy and the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: Should There be a Global Standard?’ Transnational Dispute Management 1.1 (2004), www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=48.Google Scholar

Siehr, Kurt. ‘Ausländische Eingriffsnormen im inländischen Wirtschaftskollisionsrecht’. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht 52.H. 1/2 (1988): 41–103.Google Scholar

Siehr, Kurt. Internationales Privatrecht (C. F. Muller, 2001).Google Scholar

Silberman, Linda. ‘Lessons for the USA from the Hague Principles’. Uniform Law Review 22.2 (2017a): 422–34.Google Scholar

Silberman, Linda. ‘(American) Conflict of Laws Revolution’. In Basedow, Jürgen, Rühl, Gisela, Ferrari, Franco and Asensio, Pedro de Miguel (eds.), Encyclopedia of Private International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017b): 77–81.Google Scholar

Silberman, Linda and Hess, Robert Uwe. ‘Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Set Aside or Annulled at the Seat of Arbitration’. Cambridge Compendium of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 22–14 (2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4029102.Google Scholar

Silberman, Linda and Simowitz, Aaron D. ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Awards: What Hath Daimler Wrought?’ New York University Law Review 91 (2016): 344–95.Google Scholar

Simonsen, Lasse. Avtaler om bygging og kjøp av bolig (Gyldendal, 2022).Google Scholar

Sippel, Harald and Duggal, Kabir (eds.). Force Majeure and Hardship in the Asia-Pacific Region (Juris, 2021).Google Scholar

Smit, Lise, Bright, Claire, McCorquodale, Robert, Bauer, Matthias, Deringer, Hanna, Baeza-Breinbauer, Daniela, Torres-Cortés, Francisca, Alleweldt, Frank, Kara, Senda, Salinier, Camille and Tobed, Héctor Tejero. European Commission Study on Due Diligence Requirements Through the Supply Chain: Final Report (Publications Office, 2020), https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/39830.Google Scholar

Smith, Carsten. ‘Voldgift–domstolenes konkurrent og hjelper’. Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 106.5 (1993): 474–95.Google Scholar

Soltysinski, Stanislaw and Olechowski, Mateusz. ‘Observations on CME v. Czech Republic’. Stockholm Arbitration Report 2 (2003): 224.Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence B. ‘The Interpretation-Construction Distinction’. Constitutional Commentary 27 (2010): 95.Google Scholar

Sonnenberger, Hans Jürgen. ‘Treu und Glauben-ein supranationaler Grundsatz?’ Festschrift für Walter Odersky zum 65. Geburtstag am 17. Juli 1996 (De Gruyter, 2018): 703–22.Google Scholar

Spagnolo, Lisa. ‘Green Eggs and Ham: The CISG, Path Dependence, and the Behavioural Economics of Lawyers’ Choices of Law in International Sales Contracts’. Journal of Private International Law 6.2 (2010): 417–64.Google Scholar

Spagnolo, Lisa. ‘Opening Pandora’s Box: Good Faith and Precontractual Liability in the CISG’. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 21.2(Fall) (2017): 261–310.Google Scholar

Sprange, Thomas K. ‘Corruption in Arbitration’. Dossiers of the ICC Institute of World Business Law (2015).Google Scholar

Sternlight, Jean R. ‘Panacea or Corporate Tool? Debunking the Supreme Court’s Preference for Binding Arbitration’. Washington University Law Quarterly 74.3 (1996): 637–712.Google Scholar

Symeonides, Symeon C. ‘Material Justice and Conflicts Justice in Choice of Law’. In Borchers, Patrick J. and Zekoll, Joachim (eds.), Conflict of Laws for the Third Millennium: Essays in Honor of Friedrich K. Juenger (Transnational Publishers, 2001): 125–40.Google Scholar

Symeonides, Symeon C. ‘Party Autonomy and Private-Law Making in Private International Law: The Lex Mercatoria That Isn’t’. In Festschrift für Konstantinos D. Kerameus (Ant. N. Sakkoulas & Bruylant Publishers, 2009): 1397–423.Google Scholar

Symeonides, Symeon C. ‘The Hague Principles on Choice of Law for International Contracts: Some Preliminary Comment’. The American Journal of Comparative Law 61.4 (2013): 873–900.Google Scholar

Symeonides, Symeon C. ‘Party Autonomy in International Contracts and the Multiple Ways of Slicing the Apple’. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 39 (2014): 1123.Google Scholar

Tercier, Pierre. ‘Quels defies pour l’arbitrage international?’ La lettre de l’AFA 31 (Association Francaise d’Arbitrage, 2022), http://www.afa-arbitrage.com/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=773&wysijap=subscriptions-2#dossier_1Google Scholar

Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. Bailii Lecture: Developing Commercial Law through the Courts: Rebalancing the Relationship between the Courts and Arbitration (9 March 2016).Google Scholar

Thue, Helge Johan. Internasjonal privatrett (Gyldendal Academic, 2002).Google Scholar

Torremans, Paul (ed.). Cheshire, North & Fawcett Private International Law, 15th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Twigg-Flesner, Christian. ‘Standard Terms in International Commercial Law: The Example of Documentary Credits’. In Schulze, Reiner (ed.), New Features in Contract Law (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2007): 325–39.Google Scholar

Uchida, Takashi. ‘Contract Law Reform in Japan and the UNIDROIT Principles’. Uniform Law Review 16 (2011): 705.Google Scholar

UNCTAD. Transparency in IIAS: A Sequel, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements (2012).Google Scholar

UNCTAD. World Investment Report (2015).Google Scholar

UNCTAD. World Investor Report 2017 (WIR, 2017).Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the work of its 39th session, A/RES/61/32 (2006a).Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 4 December 2006, 18 December, A/RES/61/33 (2006b).Google Scholar

UNIDROIT, Position Paper with Draft Provisions on Termination of Long-Term Contracts for Just Cause by Professor Francois Dessemontet, UNIDROIT 2009 – Study L – Doc.109 (Excerpts).Google Scholar

UNIDROIT, ‘The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and Long-Term Contracts’. Position paper prepared by Professor Michael Joachim Bonell, October 2014, UNIDROIT 2014 Study L – Doc. 126.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Explanatory Memorandum on the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985, as amended in 2006, https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-09955_e_ebook.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on the work of its thirty-second session, 17 May – 4 June 1999, Supplement no. 17, A/54/17.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Report of the Working Group on Arbitration on the work of its thirty-second session (Vienna, 20 – 31 March 2000), 10 April 2000, A/CN.9/468.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Working Paper on Settlement of commercial disputes, 6 February 2002, A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.118.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Working Paper on Settlement of commercial disputes, 14 December 2005, A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.139.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Draft legislative provisions on interim measures and the form of arbitration agreement – Draft declaration regarding the interpretation of articles II (2) and VII (1) of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 4 May 2006, A/CN.9/609.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Draft legislative provisions on interim measures and the form of arbitration agreement – Draft declaration regarding the interpretation of articles II (2) and VII (1) of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 10 May 2006, A/CN.9/609/Add.2.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Draft legislative provisions on interim measures and the form of arbitration agreement – Draft declaration regarding the interpretation of articles II (2) and VII (1) of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 19th June–7th July 2006, A/CN.9/609/Add.3.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Draft legislative provisions on interim measures and the form of arbitration agreement – Draft declaration regarding the interpretation of articles II (2) and VII (1) of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 19th June–7th July 2006, A/CN.9/609/Add.5.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Draft legislative provisions on interim measures and the form of arbitration agreement – Draft declaration regarding the interpretation of articles II (2) and VII (1) of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 19 June 2006, A/CN.9/609/Add.6.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law, 18 July 2006, A/CN.4/L.702.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Report of the Working Group on Arbitration and Conciliation on the work of its forty-sixth session (New York, 5–9 February 2007), A/CN.9/619.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Report of Working Group II (Arbitration and Conciliation) on the work of its forty-ninth session (Vienna, 15–19 September 2008), A/CN.9/665.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Digest of Case Law on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (2016), https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/cisg_digest_2016.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings (2016).Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Thirty-fourth session (Vienna, 27 November–1 December 2017), Possible reform of investor–State dispute settlement (ISDS), Note by the Secretariat, 18 September 2017, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.142.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Report of Working Group III (Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the work of its thirty-fifth session (New York, 23–27 April 2017), 14 May 2018, A/CN.9/935.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), 54th session, 23 June–16 July 2021, A/CN.9/LIV/CRP.1/Add.12.Google Scholar

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), Working Paper on Possible reform of investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), Ensuring independence and impartiality on the part of arbitrators and decision makers in ISDS, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.151.Google Scholar

UNCITRAL, HCCH and Unidroit. Legal Guide to Uniform Instruments in the Area of International Commercial Contracts, with a Focus on Sales, 2021.Google Scholar

UK House of Lords European Union Committee, Social Policy and Consumer Affairs (Sub-Committee G), 12th Report of Session 200809, European Contract Law: The Draft Common Frame of Reference, Report with Evidence (10 June 2009).Google Scholar

Uribe, Rodrigo Momberg. ‘Change of Circumstances in International Instruments of Contract Law. The Approach of the CISG, PICC, PECL and DCFR’. In Ferrari, Franco and Gillette, Clayton P. (eds.), International Sales Law (Edward Elgar, 2017): 233–66.Google Scholar

van den Berg, Albert Jan. The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958 (Deventer, 1981).Google Scholar

van den Berg, Albert Jan. ‘The Application of the New York Convention by the Courts’. In van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed.), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, ICCA Congress Series, No. 9 (Kluwer Law International, 1999): 25–35.Google Scholar

van den Berg, Albert Jan. ‘Consolidated Commentary on the New York Convention’. In ICCA Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXVIII (Kluwer Law International, 2003).Google Scholar

van den Berg, Albert Jan. ‘Appeal Mechanism for ISDS Awards: Interaction with the New York and ICSID Conventions’. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 34.1 (2019): 1–34.Google Scholar

van Houtte, Hans. The Law of International Trade, 2nd ed. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2002).Google Scholar

van Loon, Hans. ‘Strategic Climate Litigation in the Dutch Courts: A Source of Inspiration for NGO’s Elsewhere?’ Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica 66.4 (2020): 69–84.Google Scholar

Veneziano, Anna. ‘UNIDROIT Principles and CISG: Change of Circumstances and Duty to Renegotiate According to the Belgian Supreme Court’. Uniform Law Review 15 (2010): 137–49.Google Scholar

Vettese, Maria C. ‘Multinational Companies and National Contracts’. In Cordero-Moss, Guiditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 20–32.Google Scholar

Vogenauer, Stefan. ‘Regulatory Competition Through Choice of Contract Law and Choice of Forum in Europe: Theory and Evidence’. European Review of Private Law 21.1 (2013): 13–78.Google Scholar

Vogenauer, Stefan and Weatherill, Stephen (eds.). The Harmonisation of European Contract Law (Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar

Christian, von Bar, Clive, Eric M., and Schulte-Nölke, Hans (eds.). Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009).Google Scholar

von Staudinger, J. Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen (Otto Schmidt/De Gruyter, 2019).Google Scholar

Wahab, Mohamed S. Abdel, Bao, Chiann, Fessas, Alexander G., Friedman, Mark W., Salomon, Claudia T., and Zuleta, Eduardo (eds.). Leadership, Legitimacy, Legacy: A Tribute to Alexis Mourre (International Chamber of Commerce, 2022).Google Scholar

Wallin, Martin. ‘Observations in Connection with the Decision 8090–99 by the Svea Court of Appeal’, Stockholm Arbitration Report 1 (SCC Arbitration Institute, 2003): 263–72.Google Scholar

Walt, Steven D. ‘The Modest Role of Good Faith in Uniform Sales Law’. In Ferrari, Franco and Gillette, Clayton P. (eds.), International Sales Law (Edward Elgar, 2017): 520–56.Google Scholar

Weise, P.-F. Lex Mercatoria (Peter Lang, 1990).Google Scholar

Weller, Marc-Philippe, Kaller, Luca and Schulz, Alix. ‘Haftung deutscher Unternehmen für Menschenrechtsverletzungen im Ausland’. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 216 (2016): 387–420.Google Scholar

Wetter, Gillis J. ‘Conduct of the Arbitration’. Journal of International Arbitration 2 (1985): 7.Google Scholar

Wetter, Gillis J. ‘Issues of Corruption before International Arbitral Tribunals: The Authentic Text and True Meaning of Judge Gunnar Lagergren’s 1963 Award in ICC Case No. 1110’. Arbitration International 10.3 (1994): 277–94.Google Scholar

Whittaker, Simon. ‘On the Development of European Standard Contract Terms’. European Review of Contract Law (2006): 51–76.Google Scholar

Wiegand, Wayne. ‘Iura novit curia v. Ne ultra petita: Die Anfechtbarkeit von Schiedsgerichtsurteilen im Lichte der jüngsten Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichts’. In Greiner, Monique Jametti, Berger, Bernhard and Gungerich, Andreas (eds.), Rechtsetzung und Rechtsdurchsetzung. Festschrift fur Franz Keller- hals (Stampfli Verlag, 2005).Google Scholar

Windmöller, Martin. Die Vertragsspaltung im internationalen Privatrecht des EGBGB und des EGVVG (Nomos, 2000).Google Scholar

Winkler, Matteo and Schinazi, Mikaël. ‘No Longer “Pale, Male, and Stale”? Approaching Diversity and Inclusiveness in International Arbitration’. In Blackaby, Nigel, Reisman, Michael, Azar, Cecilia, Dávalos, Carlos and Aziz, Luis Alberto (eds.), Liber Amicorum Guillermo Aguilar Álvarez (Wolters Kluwer, 2021).Google Scholar

Wiwen-Nilsson, Tore. ‘Observations on CME v. Czech Republic’. Stockholm Arbitration Report 2 (2003): 254f.Google Scholar

Yala, Farouk. ‘“Observations” in Connection with Swembalt v. Republic of Latvia’. Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce. Stockholm Arbitration Report 2 (2004).Google Scholar

Yeo, Tiong Min. ‘Singapore’. In Basedow, Jürgen, Rühl, Gisela, Ferrari, Franco and de Miguel Asensio, Pedro (eds.), Encyclopedia of Private International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Reinhard and Whittaker, Simon (eds.). Good Faith in European Contract Law (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Zweigert, Konrad and Hein, Kötz. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung auf dem Gebiete des Privatrechts (Mohr Siebeck, 1996).Google Scholar

Zykin, Ivan S. ‘The East European Tradition: Application of Boilerplate Clauses under Russian Law’. In Cordero-Moss, Giuditta (ed.), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011): 329–43.Google Scholar