Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Overview and Scope
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Part I The Challenges
- Part II Inter-basin Water Transfer in Australia
- Part III Inter-basin Water Transfer in Other Selected Countries
- 11 Inter-basin water transfer in the United States of America
- 12 Inter-basin water transfer in Canada
- 13 Inter-basin water transfer in China
- 14 India: The National River-Linking Project
- 15 Inter-basin water transfer, successes, failures and the future
- Part IV Appendices
- Glossary
- Index
- References
11 - Inter-basin water transfer in the United States of America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Overview and Scope
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Part I The Challenges
- Part II Inter-basin Water Transfer in Australia
- Part III Inter-basin Water Transfer in Other Selected Countries
- 11 Inter-basin water transfer in the United States of America
- 12 Inter-basin water transfer in Canada
- 13 Inter-basin water transfer in China
- 14 India: The National River-Linking Project
- 15 Inter-basin water transfer, successes, failures and the future
- Part IV Appendices
- Glossary
- Index
- References
Summary
OVERVIEW OF GEOGRAPHY, POPULATION, LAND AND WATER
GEOGRAPHY
The Unites States of America covers a total area of 9 372 570 km2. To this, Alaska contributes 1 530 690 km2 and Hawaii 16 760 km2. Other areas outside the 48 contiguous States include Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam and the Virgin Islands. The east–west and north–south dimensions of the country are approximately 4517 km and 2572 km respectively. The United States has diverse physiographic features with broad plains, plateaus and mountain areas (Figure 11.1). The country's surface elevation ranges from 86 m below sea level in Death Valley, California to 4419 m at Mount Whitney, California, and 6198 m at Mount McKinley, Alaska (U.S. Census Bureau, 2003, Table 363). The approximate mean elevation of the country is 763 m, and its main physiographic regions are (Murphy, 1996):
The Coastal Plain is located along the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. Midway along the Coastal Plain, the Florida Peninsula separates the waters of the Atlantic from those of the Gulf of Mexico. West of the Peninsula, the Coastal Plain is wide, but towards the north-east it gradually narrows and in the neighbourhood of New York City the plain comes to an end.
The Appalachian Highlands make up the dominant relief feature of the eastern United States, but they have relatively low elevation. Mount Mitchell in North Carolina, with an elevation of 2038 m, is the highest peak in eastern North America. The Appalachian Highlands form an effective watershed between the streams that flow to the Atlantic Ocean and those that flow westward to the Mississippi River.
[…]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Inter-Basin Water TransferCase Studies from Australia, United States, Canada, China and India, pp. 201 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
(2003). Office of Water Use Efficiency: the services we offer. Water Conservation News. January 2003, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
(unpublished). Colorado–Big Thompson Project: Historic Reclamation Projects Book. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.Google Scholar
, , and (unpublished ).Central Valley Project: Historic Reclamation Projects Book. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.Google Scholar
, and eds. (1988). Hydrogeology. Boulder, Colorado: The Geological Society of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, R. V. (1981). Computer simulation of the Colorado River for long-term operation studies. In ed. State-of-the-Art Irrigation Drainage and Flood Control. New Delhi: International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, V. II, pp. 67–92.Google Scholar
(1979). The Dust Bowl: Men, Dirt, and Depression. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
California Bay–Delta Authority (2003). California Bay–Delta Authority: 2003 Annual Report. Sacramento, California: California Bay–Delta Authority.
Central Utah Water Conservancy District (2003). Annual Report. Orem, Utah: Central Utah Water Conservancy District, Operation and Maintenance Department.
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum (1993). 1993 Review: Water Quality Standards for Salinity, Colorado River System. Bountiful, Utah: Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum.
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum (2002). 2002 Review: Water Quality Standards for Salinity, Colorado River System. Bountiful, Utah: Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum.
Colorado River Board of California (2000). Draft California's Colorado River Water Use Plan. Glendale, California: Colorado River Board of California.
Colorado River Salinity Program Coordinator (1993). Salinity Update. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Department of Water Resources (1993). Sacramento San Joaquin Delta Atlas. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources (1998). California Water Plan Update: Bulletin 160–98. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources (1999). California State Water Project Atlas. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources (2003a). California's Groundwater: Bulletin 118 Update 2003. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources (2003b). Water Desalination: Findings and Recommendations. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources (2005a). California Water Plan: Highlights. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources (2005b). California Water Plan Update 2005: Volume 1 – Strategic Plan. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources (2005c). California Water Plan Update 2005: Volume 2 – Resource Management Strategies. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
(1948). The Thirsty Land: The Story of the Central Valley Project. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Desalination Task Force (2003). Desalination Task Force Report: Draft. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
Division of Water Resources (1997). Utah State Water Plan: Utah Lake Basin. Salt Lake City: Division of Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources.
Division of Water Resources (1999). Utah State Water Plan: Uintah Basin. Salt Lake City: Division of Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources.
Division of Water Resources (2001). Utah's Water Resources Planning for the Future. Salt Lake City: Division of Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources.
EBMUD (2001). Urban Water Management Plan 2000. Oakland, California. East Bay Municipal Utility District.
EBMUD (2003). East Bay Municipal Utility District: Annual Report 2003. Oakland, California. East Bay Municipal Utility District.
Economic Research Service (2003a). Chapter 1.1: Land Use. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Economic Research Service (2003b). Chapter 2.1: Water Use and Pricing in Agriculture. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
and (1990). Adverse impacts and alternatives to large dams and interbasin transfers in the Colorado River Basin, USA. In United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation. The Impact of Large Water Projects on the Environment. Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation, pp. 137–144.Google Scholar
(1996). A River No More: The Colorado River and the West. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Water marketing: obstacles and opportunities. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy 16(1): 54–62.Google Scholar
, and eds. (1999). Land Subsidence in the United States. Circular 1182. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
, , , and (2003). Evolving Issues and Practices in Managing Ground-Water Resources: Case Studies on the Role of Science. Circular 1247. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
, , and (1973). Water Atlas of the United States. Third Edition. Port Washington: Water Information Center.Google Scholar
(2002). Comparing 20th century trends in U.S. and global agricultural water and land use. Water International 27(3): 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989). American Exodus: The Dust Bowl Migration and Okie Culture in California. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grolier Incorporated (1996). The Encyclopedia Americana: International Edition. Danbury, Connecticut: Grolier Incorporated.
(2002). California's Water Market by the Numbers. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
(2003). Who Should be Allowed to Sell Water in California? Third-Party Issues and the Water Market. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
and (2004). Water Supply and Growth in California: A Survey of City and County Land-Use Planners. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
(1984). Ground-Water Regions of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2242. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Hedlund, J. D. (1984). USDA planning process for Colorado River Basin Salinity Control. In ed. Salinity in Watercourses and Reservoirs. Proceedings of the 1983 International Symposium on State-of-the-Art Control of Salinity, Salt Lake City, Utah, 13–15 July 1983. Boston: Butterworth, pp. 63–77.Google Scholar
and (1971). Interbasin Transfer of Water: Economic Issues and Impacts. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
(1969). Water Development and Water Planning in the Southwestern United States. Kulturgeografisk Institute, Aarhus University, Denmark.Google Scholar
(2001). The Great Thirst: Californians and Water, A History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
, , , , and (2004). Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1268.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
, and (1993). The Great Central Valley: California's Heartland. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1965). John Muir and the Sierra Club: The Battle for Yosemite. San Francisco: Sierra Club.Google Scholar
Jones, W. K. (1996). Los Angeles Aqueduct: a search for water. In ed. The Physical City: Public Space and the Infrastructure. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 369–385.Google Scholar
ed. (1979). The California Water Atlas. California: Governor's Office of Planning and Research.Google Scholar
and (1986). Inventory of Interbasin Transfers of Water in the Eastern United States. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 86–148.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. K. and Moody, C. D. (1984). Historical trends in concentration and load of major ions in the Colorado River System. In ed. Salinity in Watercourses and Reservoirs. Proceedings of the 1983 International Symposium on State-of-the-Art Control of Salinity. Salt Lake City, Utah, 13–15 July 1983. Boston: Butterworth, pp. 181–192.Google Scholar
(1996). Face of the land. In The Encyclopedia Americana,International Edition.Danbury, Connecticut: Grolier Incorporated. V. 27, pp. 500–515.Google Scholar
Murray, R. R. and Johnston, R. (2001). History of the Central Utah Project: a Federal perspective. In and eds. Transbasin Water Transfers. Proceedings of the 2001 USCID Water Management Conference, Denver, Colorado, 27–30 June 2001. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
National Drought Policy Commission (2000). Preparing for Drought in the 21st Century. Washington D.C.: National Drought Policy Commission.
National Research Council (1992). Water Transfers in the West: Efficiency, Equity, and the Environment. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
and (2003). Large Floods in the United States: Where they Happen and Why. Circular 1245. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Office of the State Engineer (2003). New Mexico State Water Plan. Santa Fe, New Mexico: New Mexico Office of the State Engineer and the Interstate Stream Commission.
Office of the State Engineer (2004). 2003 New Mexico State Water Plan, Appendix A: Water Resources Issues. Santa Fe, New Mexico: New Mexico Office of the State Engineer and the Interstate Stream Commission.
(1934). Hetch Hetchy: Its Origin and History. San Francisco: Recorder Printing and Publishing Company.Google Scholar
, , and , Compilers (1993). National Water Summary 1990–91: Hydrologic Events and Stream Water Quality. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Supply Paper 2400. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
(2000). Significant floods in the United States During the 20th century. Lawrence, Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey. Fact Sheet 024-00.
(1985). Inventory of Interbasin Transfers of Water in the Western Conterminous United States. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 85-166.Google Scholar
, and (2002). Flood Damage in the United States, 1926–2000: A Reanalysis of National Weather Service Estimates. Boulder, Colorado: National Center for Atmospheric Research.Google Scholar
(1968). Water transfer: must the American west be won again?Geographical Review 58: 108–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph M. Parsons Company (1964). NAWAPA, North American Water and Power Alliance: Water and Power Plan. Los Angeles: Ralph M. Parsons Company.
Reader's Digest (1998). Reader's Digest Atlas of America: Our Nation in Maps, Facts, and Pictures. New York: The Reader's Digest Association.
Recycled Water Task Force (2003). Water Recycling 2030: Recommendations of California's Recycled Water Task Force. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources.
(1987). Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
(1995). Water transfers in California: potentials and constraints. Water International 20: 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1998). Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 1995. Circular 1200. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
State Water Resources Control Board (1999). A Guide to Water Transfers. Sacramento: State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights.
Thaemert, D. K. and Faucett, A. H. (2001). Evolution of transmountain water diversions in Colorado. In and eds. Transbasin Water Transfers. Proceedings of the 2001 USCID Water Management Conference, Denver, Colorado, 27–30 June 2001. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Committee on Irrigation and Drainage pp. 139–147.Google Scholar
(1992). The Last Water Hole in the West: The Colorado–Big Thompson Project and the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. Niwot, Colorado: The University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (1992). Title I Program Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act. Report to the Secretary of the Interior and the Congress. Nevada: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Region.
U.S. Census Bureau (2003). Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (1989). The Second RCA Appraisal, Soil Water and Related Resources on Nonfederal Land in the United States, Analysis of Conditions and Trends. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of the Interior (2001). Quality of Water: Colorado River Basin. Progress Report No. 20. Denver: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
U.S. Department of Interior (2003). Water 2025: Preventing Crises and Conflict in the West. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Interior.
U.S. Geological Survey (1999). The Quality of Our Nation's Waters: Nutrients and Pesticides. Circular 1225. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.
U.S. Geological Survey (2002). Report to Congress: Concepts for National Assessment of Water Availability and Use. Circular 1223. Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.
Van Valen, N. (1996). A neglected aspect of Owens River Aqueduct story: the inception of the Los Angeles municipal electric system. In ed. The Physical City: Public Space and the Infrastructure. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 387–411.Google Scholar
Winchester, J. N. (2001). A historical view: Transmountain diversion development in Colorado. In and eds. Transbasin Water Transfers. Proceedings of the 2001 USCID Water Management Conference, Denver, Colorado, 27–30 June, 2001. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, pp. 479–497.Google Scholar
and (1998). 2000 years of drought variability in the central United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 79(12): 2693–2714.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979 ).Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and eds. (1978). Drought Research Needs. Proceedings of the Conference on Drought Research Needs, held at Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 12–15 December, 1977. Fort Collins: Water Resources Publications.Google Scholar
Young, G. and Hunn, R. (2001). On Tap: An interactive web site to facilitate water transfer in California. In and eds. Transbasin Water Transfers. Proceedings of the 2001 USCID Water Management Conference, Denver, Colorado, 27–30 June, 2001. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, pp. 287–297.Google Scholar
Zimbelman, D. D. and Werner, B. R. (2001). Water management in the Northern Colorado Water Conservation District. In and eds. Transbasin Water Transfers. Proceedings of the 2001 USCID Water Management Conference, Denver, Colorado, 27–30 June 2001. Denver, Colorado: U.S. Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, pp. 331–339.Google Scholar