Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-ph4cd Total loading time: 0.784 Render date: 2022-07-04T11:17:32.880Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

7 - Developing Transformative and Orchestrating Capacities for Climate Governance Experimentation in Rotterdam

from Part II - Beyond Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2018

Bruno Turnheim
Affiliation:
King's College London
Paula Kivimaa
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Frans Berkhout
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Under uncertainty, policymakers often initiate policy experiments, and policy pilots form a common and important form of policy experimenting. Effective policy pilots may be continued for policy development via scaling-up. However, the empirical evidence on the nature of such pilots and the processes and potential of their scaling-up is lacking. Using a comparative case design this chapter develops a model of policy change and applies it to the study of the design and scaling-up of policy pilots launched to deal with climate risks to the agriculture sector in India. More than two-thirds of India’s cultivable area is rainfed and the Government of India has established many pilots to address risks to agricultural production, especially in rainfed areas. Examining the features of fourteen agriculture policy pilots in India, this chapter asks the question, do the design characteristics of policy pilots influence their scaling-up and policy integration? The analysis reveals that despite their theoretical acknowledgment as an approach that enables higher risk taking and experimentation, in practice the primary contribution of pilots is found to be limited to operating as avenues for periodically updating existing policies and programmes through marginal changes in their current scope.
Type
Chapter
Information
Innovating Climate Governance
Moving Beyond Experiments
, pp. 123 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., and Zangl, B. (eds.) (2015). International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anguelovski, I., and Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 169175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C. K., and Bartenberger, M. (2016). Varieties of Experimentalism. Ecological Economics, 130, 6473. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2475844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beisheim, M., and Simon, N. (August 2015). Meta-governance of partnerships for sustainable development: Actors’ perspectives on how the UN could improve partnerships’ governance services in areas of limited statehood. Berlin: SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No. 68.
Berkhout, F., Verbong, G., Wieczorek, A., Raven, R., Lebel, C., and Bai, X. (2010). Sustainability experiments in Asia: Innovations shaping alternative development pathways? Environmental Science and Policy, 13, 261271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettini, Y., Brown, R., and de Haan, F. J. (2015). Exploring institutional adaptive capacity in practice: Examining water governance adaptation in Australia. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07291–200147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, J. J., and Brown, R. R. (2012). Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(7), 13401353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H., and Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H. A., and Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22, 136154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, S., Shaw, A., Dale, A., and Robinson, J. (2014). Triggering transformative change: A development path approach to climate change response in communities. Climate Policy, 14(4), 467487. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.876342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capano, G., Howlett, M., and Ramesh, M. (2015). Bringing governments back in: Governance and governing in comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(4), 311321. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2015.1031977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castán Broto, V., and Bulkeley, H. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23, 92102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, S., Falkner, R., van Asselt, H., and Goldberg, M. (2015). Strengthening non-state climate action: A progress assessment of commitments launched at the 2014 UN Climate Summit. Centre for Climate Change Economics Policy, Working Paper No. 242. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, Working Paper No. 216.
Chapin, S. F. III, Carpenter, S. R., Kofinas, G. P., Folke, C., Abel, N., Clark, W. C., Olsson, P., Stafford Smith, D. M., Walker, B., Young, O. R., Berkes, F., Biggs, R., Grove, J. M., Naylor, R. L., Pinkerton, E., Steffen, W., and Swanson, F. J. (2010). Ecosystem stewardship: Sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25(4), 241249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chelleri, L., Waters, J. J., Olazabal, M., and Minucci, G. (2015). Resilience trade-offs: Addressing multiple scales and temporal aspects of urban resilience. Environment & Urbanization, 27(1), 181198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G. S., Olsson, P., Chapin, F. S. III, and Holling, C. S. (2012). Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes. Landscape Ecology. doi:10.1007/s10980-012–9725-4.CrossRef
De Greef, P. (2005) (ed.). Rotterdam Waterstad 2035. Heijningen: Jap Sam Books.Google Scholar
Elzen, B., Leeuwis, C., and van Mierlo, B. (2008). Anchorage of Innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to use the greenhouse effect as an energy source. Working Paper. Wageningen: Wageningen University.
Evans, J. (2016). Trials and tribulations: Problematizing the city through/as urban experimentation. Geography Compass, 10(10), 429443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrelly, M., and Brown, R. (2011). Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward? Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 721732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., and Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantzeskaki, N., Loorbach, D., and Meadowcroft, J. (2012). Governing societal transitions to sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1), 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantzeskaki, N., Wittmayer, J., and Loorbach, D. (2014). The role of partnerships in ‘realizing’ urban sustainability in Rotterdam’s City Ports Area, the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 406417. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, R., Jarvie, J., Orleans Reed, S., Sutarto, R., Thinphanga, P., Canh Toan, V. (2014). Mainstreaming urban climate resilience into policy and planning; reflections from Asia. Urban Climate, 7, 619. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galaz, V., Crona, B., Österblom, H., Olsson, P., and Folke, C. (2012). Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries: Emerging governance of climate change – ocean acidification – marine biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 81, 2132. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemeente Rotterdam (2007). Waterplan 2: Werken an water voor een aantrekkelijke en klimaatbestendige stad. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
Gemeente Rotterdam (2012). Programma Duurzaam, Investeren in duuzaame groei. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
Gemeente Rotterdam (2015). Duurzaam dichter bij de Rotterdammer; Programma Duurzaam 2015–2018. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.
Gemeente Rotterdam (2016). Rotterdam resilience strategy: Ready for the 21st century. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam. http://lghttp.60358.nexcesscdn.net/8046264/images/page/-/100rc/pdfs/strategy-resilient-rotterdam.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2016.
Gupta, J., Termeer, C. J. A. M., Klostermann, J. E. M., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M. A., Jong, P., Nooteboom, S. G., Bergsma, E. J. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13:459471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, M., and Marvin, S. (2010). Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39, 477485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, M., Marvin, S., and Bulkeley, H. (2013). The intermediary organisation of low carbon cities: A comparative analysis of transitions in Greater London and Greater Manchester. Urban Studies, 50, 14031422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II Contribution to AR5. Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 2945.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2011). Metagovernance. In Bevir, M. (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Governance. London: Sage, 106123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhagroe, S. (2016). Urban transition politics: How struggles for sustainability are (re)making urban spaces. PhD thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Karvonen, A., Evans, J. P., and van Heur, B. (2014). The politics of urban experiments: Radical change or business as usual? In Marvin, S., and Hodson, M. (eds.), After Sustainable Cities. London: Routledge, 105114.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, P., Hildén, M., Huitema, D., Jordan, A., and Newig, J. (2017). Experiments in climate governance: A systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169: 1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klijn, E., and Edelenbos, J. (2007). Metagovernance as network management. In Sørensen, E., and Torfing, J. (eds.), Theories of Democratic Network Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 199214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooiman, J., and Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta-Governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87(4), 818836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 23(1), 161183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loorbach, D. (2014). To Transition! Governance Panarchy in the New Transformation. Inaugural Lecture. Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D., and Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42(3), 237246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., and Huffenreuter, L. R. (2015). Transition management: Taking stock from governance experimentation. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 4866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luederitz, C., Schäpke, N., Wiek, A., Lang, D. J., Bergmann, M., Bos, J. J., Burch, S., Davies, A., Evans, J., König, A., Farrelly, M. A., Forrest, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Gibson, R. B., Kay, B., Loorbach, D., McCormick, K., Parodi, O., Rauschmayer, F., Schneidewind, U., Stauffacher, M., Stelzer, F., Trencher, G., Venjakob, J., Vergragt, P. J., von Wehrden, H., and Westley, F. R. (2016). Learning through evaluation. A tentative evaluation scheme for sustainability transition experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005.CrossRef
Marshall, N. A., Park, S. E., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., and Howden, S. M. (2012). Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environmental Research Letters, 7, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, K., Anderberg, S., Coenen, L., and Neij, L. (2013). Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molenaar, A., Dircke, P., and Gebraad, C. (2013). Rotterdam. In Molenaar, A., Aerts, J., Dircke, P., and Ikert, M. (eds.), Connecting Delta Cities: Resilient Cities and Climate Adaptation Strategies. Rotterdam: City of Rotterdam, 3051.Google Scholar
Moore, M.-L., and Westley, F. (2011). Surmountable chasms: Networks and Social innovation for resilient systems. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 5. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art5/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M.-L., Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., and Holroyd, C. (2011). The loop, the lens and the lesson: Using resilience theory to examine public policy and social innovation. In Nicholls, A., and Murdock, A. (eds.), Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 320.Google Scholar
Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., and Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111122.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Galaz, V., and Boonstra, W. J. (2014). Sustainability transformations: A resilience perspective. Ecology and Society 19(4), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., and Holling, C. S. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 18. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C., Becker, G., Knieper, C., and Sendzimir, J. (2013). How multilevel societal learning processes facilitate transformative change: A comparative case study analysis on flood management. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05779-180458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauschmayer, F., Bauler, T., and Schäpke, N. (2015). Towards a thick understanding of sustainability transitions: Linking transition management, capabilities and social practices. Ecological Economics, 109, 211221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, R., van den Bosch, S., and Weterings, R. (2010). Transitions and strategic niche management: Towards a competence kit for practitioners. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijke, J., Farrelly, M., Brown, R., and Zevenbergen, C. (2013). Configuring transformative governance to enhance resilient urban water systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 25(2013), 6272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero Lankao, P., and Dodman, D. (2011). Cities in transition: Transforming urban centers from hotbeds of GHG emissions and vulnerability to seedbeds of sustainability and resilience. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 113120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, C., Solecki, W. D., Hammer, S. A., and Mehrotra, S. (eds.) (2011). Climate Change and Cities: First Assessment Report of the Urban Climate Change Research Network. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotmans, J., and Loorbach, D. (2010). Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance: A systemic and reflexive approach. In Grin, J., Rotmans, J., and Schot, J. (eds.), Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge, 105220.Google Scholar
Rotterdam Climate Initiative (2007). Action programme and objectives 2007–2010. Rotterdam: City of Rotterdam.
Rotterdam Climate Initiative (2009). Rotterdam climate proof: The Rotterdam challenge on water and climate adaptation. 2009 adaptation programme. Rotterdam. Rotterdam: City of Rotterdam. www.google.nl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjT0Z71xYXRAhXROlAKHY6eAwIQFgg4MAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rotterdamclimateinitiative.nl%2Fdocuments%2F2015-en-ouder%2FRCP%2FEnglish%2FRCP_adaptatie_eng.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFWDPhuaDUNGD_W_o3LCMxp8laeOg. Accessed 10 June 2016.
Rotterdam Climate Initiative (2012). Rotterdam climate change adaptation strategy. Rotterdam: City of Rotterdam. www.rotterdamclimateinitiative.nl/documents/2015-en-ouder/Documenten/20121210_RAS_EN_lr_versie_4.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2016.
Scourfield, P. (2015). Implementing co-production in adult social care: An example of meta-governance failure? Social Policy and Society, 14(4), 541554. doi: 10.1017/S1474746414000438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengers, F., and Raven, R. (2015). Towards a spatial perspective on niche development: The case of Bus Rapid Transit. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 166182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfang, G., and Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, A., Burch, S., Kristensen, F., Robinson, J., and Dale, A. (2014). Accelerating the sustainability transition: Exploring synergies between adaptation and mitigation in British Columbian communities. Global Environmental Change, 25, 4151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., and Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 7, 41(6). doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. Public Administration, 36(1), 98114. doi: 10.1177/0275074005282584.Google Scholar
Sørensen, E. (16–17 September 2014). The metagovernance of public innovation in governance networks. Paper presented at Policy and Politics conference, Bristol.
Sørensen, E., and Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vabo, S. I., and Røiseland, A. (2012). Conceptualizing the tools of government in urban network governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(14), 934946. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2012.691243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Buuren, A., and Loorbach, D. (2009). Policy innovation in isolation? Conditions for policy renewal by transition arenas and pilot projects. Public Management Review, 11(3), 375392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. H., Abel, N., Anderies, J. M., and Ryan, P. (2009). Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wamsler, C. (2015). Mainstreaming ecosystem-based adaptation: Transformation toward sustainability in urban governance and planning. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., and Bodin, Ö. (2013). A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 27. doi:10.5751/ES-05072–180327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S., Pearson, L. J., Kashima, Y., Lusher, D., and Pearson, C. (2013). Separating adaptive maintenance (resilience) and transformative capacity of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05100–180122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmayer, J., Van Steenbergen, F., Loorbach, D., Mock, M,. Omann, I., and Kirner, B. (2014). Exploring the transformative potential of communities. In Wittmayer, J., Roorda, C., and Van Steenbergen, F. (eds.), Governing Urban Sustainability Transitions – Inspiring examples. Rotterdam: DRIFT, Creative Commons, 8389.Google Scholar
Wolfram, M. (2016). Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities, 51, 121130. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, W., and Spaans, M. (2014). Meta-governance and developing integrated territorial strategies: The case study of MIRT territorial agendas in the Randstad (Netherlands). Planning Theory & Practice, 15(4), 543562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×