Book contents
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue: Reflections on Two Episodes of Popular Inclusion
- 1 Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America
- Part I Extending Social Policy and Participation
- Part II Inclusion and Partisan Representation
- 6 Changing Patterns of Ideology and Partisanship in Latin America
- 7 Brokering Inclusion
- 8 States of Discontent
- Part III New Party–Society Linkages
- Part IV Inclusion, Populism, and Democracy
- References
7 - Brokering Inclusion
Intermediaries, Clientelism, and Constraints on Latin America’s Left Turn
from Part II - Inclusion and Partisan Representation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2021
Book contents
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Prologue: Reflections on Two Episodes of Popular Inclusion
- 1 Inequality, Democracy, and the Inclusionary Turn in Latin America
- Part I Extending Social Policy and Participation
- Part II Inclusion and Partisan Representation
- 6 Changing Patterns of Ideology and Partisanship in Latin America
- 7 Brokering Inclusion
- 8 States of Discontent
- Part III New Party–Society Linkages
- Part IV Inclusion, Populism, and Democracy
- References
Summary
The growth of economic informality, the transformation of left party-union linkages, and the rise of political decentralization in Latin America have all empowered local “brokers" who are linked to national political parties but also substantially autonomous and often opportunistic. The leaders of left parties in the region – even parties that are externally mobilized or that advance programmatic platforms promoting greater inclusion of popular sectors – have often needed to negotiate with such actors to secure power and implement policies. In this chapter, we consider the resources that intermediaries offer to parties but also the challenges that broker-mediated incorporation poses for left parties. We then use new evidence from Brazil – n particular, from the experience of the externally mobilized, programmatic Workers’ Party (PT) – to show the necessity but also the fragility of alliances with such actors. We assess possible implications of the reliance on brokers for the sustainability of the “inclusionary turn" in Latin America.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies , pp. 219 - 253Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abranches, Sérgio. 1988. “Presidencialismo de Coalizão: O Dilema Institucional Brasileiro.” Dados 31(1): 5–38.Google Scholar
Alves, Jorge Antonio. 2018. “Transformation or Substitution? The Workers’ Party and the Right in Northeast Brazil.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 10(1): 99–132.Google Scholar
Alves, Jorge Antonio, and Hunter, Wendy. 2017. “From Right to Left in Brazil’s Northeast: Transformation, or ‘Politics as Usual’?” Comparative Politics 49(4): 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2001. Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barbosa Filho, Fernando Holanda, and Moura, Rodrigo Leandro. 2015. “Evolução Recente da Informalidade do Emprego no Brasil: Uma Análise Segundo Características da Oferta e Demanda de Trabalho.” Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico 45: 101–123.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor C. 2010. “Varieties of Electioneering: Success Contagion and Presidential Campaigns in Latin America.” World Politics 62(4): 636–675.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor C. 2016. Presidential Campaigns in Latin America: Electoral Strategies and Success Contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno, Natália S. 2018. “Bypassing the Enemy: Distributive Politics, Credit Claiming, and Non-State Organizations in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 51(3): 304–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussell, Jennifer. 2018. “When Do Middlemen Matter? Experimental Evidence on Corruption in India.” Governance 31: 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, Edwin. 2016. “Cultivating Effective Brokers: A Party Leader’s Dilemma.” British Journal of Political Science (July): 1–23.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Handlin, Samuel P.. 2009a. “Logics of collective action, state linkages, and aggregate traits: The UP-Hub versus the A-Net.” In Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America, edited by Collier, Ruth Berins and Handlin, Samuel, 61–92. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Handlin, Samuel P.. 2009b. Reorganizing Popular Politics: Participation and the New Interest Regime in Latin America. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
De la O, Ana. 2015. Crafting Policies to End Poverty in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Do Amaral, Oswaldo E., and Power, Timothy J.. 2016. “The PT at 35: Revisiting Scholarly Interpretations of the Brazilian Workers’ Party.” Journal of Latin American Studies 48(01): 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2008. Crude Democracy: Natural Resource Wealth and Political Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2011. “Decentralization and Federalism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics, edited by Kingstone, Peter and Yashar, Deborah J.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feierherd, G. 2017. “Does the Left Breed Economic Informality? Party Strategies and Selective Enforcement in Brazil.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Thomas. 2011. “A Regression Discontinuity Test of Strategic Voting and Duverger’s Law.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6(3–4): 197–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2007. “Social Policy and Collective Action: Unemployed Workers, Community Associations, and Protest in Argentina.” Politics & Society 35(2): 301–328.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2011. Deepening Local Democracy in Latin America: Participation, Decentralization, and the Left. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez Bruera, Hernán F. 2015. “Participation under Lula: Between Electoral Politics and Governability.” Latin American Politics and Society 57(2): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 2007. Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2008. “Organized Civil Society in Lula’s Brazil.” In Democratic Brazil Revisited, edited by Kingstone, Peter and Power, Timothy, 33–53. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha C., and Palmer-Rubin, Brian. 2015. “Beyond the Machine: Clientelist Brokers and Interest Organizations in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies, 0010414015574883.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 2010. The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, Peter G. 2020. “Linkage Switches in Local Elections: Evidence from the Workers’ Party in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 53(1): 109–143.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. 1995. The Workers’ Party and Democratization in Brazil. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Larreguy, Horacio, Olea, Cesar E. Montiel, and Querubín, Pablo. 2017. “Union Members as Political Brokers: Partisans or Agents?” American Journal of Political Science 61(4): 877–891.Google Scholar
Larreguy, Horacio, Marshall, John, and Querubín, Pablo. 2016. “Parties, Brokers and Voter Mobilization: How Turnout Buying Depends upon the Party’s Capacity to Monitor Brokers.” American Political Science Review 110(1): 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003a. Transforming Labor-based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003b. “From Labor Politics to Machine Politics: The Transformation of Party–Union Linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983–1999.” Latin American Research Review 38(3): 3–36.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, Van Dyck, Brandon, and Domínguez, Jorge I.. 2016. Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2010. “Segmented Party? Voter Linkages in Latin America: The Case of the Udi.” Journal of Latin American Studies 42(2): 235–356.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Altman, David. 2011. “Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization.” Latin American Politics and Society 53(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2013. “Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 49–64.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela, and Young, Lauren. 2016. “Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes.” Annual Review of Political Science 19(1) 267–288.Google Scholar
Mazzuca, Sebastian L. 2010. “Access to Power versus Exercise of Power: Reconceptualizing the Quality of Democracy in Latin America.” Studies in Comparative International Development 45(3): 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneguello, Rachel. 1989. PT: A Formação de Um Partido, 1979–1982. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P. 2012. “A Reversal of Political Fortune: The Transitional Dynamics of Conservative Rule in the Brazilian Northeast.” Latin American Politics and Society 54(1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Montero, Alfred P., and Samuels, David J.. 2004. “The Political Determinants of Decentralization in Latin America: Causes and Consequences.” In Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Montero, A. P. and Samuels, D. J., 3–32. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Novaes, Lucas M. 2015. “Modular Parties: Party Systems with Detachable Clienteles.” PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Novaes, Lucas M. 2018. “Disloyal Brokers and Weak Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 62(1): 84–98.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, and Mueller, Bernardo. 2004. “The Cost of Governing Strategic Behavior of the President and Legislators in Brazil’s Budgetary Process.” Comparative Political Studies 37(7): 781–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, Power, Timothy J., and Raile, Eric D.. 2008. “Coalitional Presidentialism and Side Payments: Explaining the Mensalão Scandal in Brazil.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Poertner, Mathias. 2018. “Capturing Votes, Creating Partisans: The Organizational Roots of New Parties in Latin America.” PhD thesis, Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1988. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano. 2014. “An Amphibian Party? Organisational Change and Adaptation in the Brazilian Workers’ Party (1980–2012).” Journal of Latin American Studies 46(1): 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2002. “Social Inequalities without Class Cleavages in Latin America’s Neoliberal Era.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36(4): 3–33.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Iram Jácome, Guedes Ladosky, Mario Henrique, and Bicev, Jonas. 2016. “Sindicalização E Representatividade Das Centrais Sindicais No Brasil.” Trabajo Social 27: 43–62.Google Scholar
Roemer, John E. 2006. Political Competition: Theory and Application. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David, and Zucco, Cesar. 2015. “Crafting Mass Partisanship at the Grass Roots.” British Journal of Political Science 45(4): 755–775.Google Scholar
Samuels, David, and Zucco, Cesar. 2016. “Party-Building in Brazil.” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, edited by Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, Van Dyck, Brandon, and Domínguez, Jorge I., 305–330. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, Domingo Faustino. 1845. Facundo o civilización y barbarie en las pampas argentinas. ISBN 987-1093-21-7.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1969. “Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review 63(4): 1142–1158.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1972. “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 91–113.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyck, Brandon. 2014a. “Why Party Organization Still Matters: The Workers’ Party in Northeastern Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 56(2): 1–26.Google Scholar
Van Dyck, Brandon Philip. 2014b. “The Paradox of Adversity: New Left Party Survival and Collapse in Latin America.” PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Van Dyck, Brandon, and Montero, Alfred P.. 2015. “Eroding the Clientelist Monopoly.” Latin American Research Review 50(4): 116–138.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy Without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Zucco, Cesar. 2008. “The President’s ‘New’ Constituency: Lula and the Pragmatic Vote in Brazil’s 2006 Presidential Elections.” Journal of Latin American Studies 40(1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar, and Power, Timothy J.. 2013. “Bolsa Família and the Shift in Lula’s Electoral Base, 2002–2006: A Reply to Bohn.” Latin American Research Review 48(2): 3–24.Google Scholar