Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:29:07.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Ronald C. Den Otter
Ronald C. Den Otter
Affiliation:
California Polytechnic State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
In Defense of Plural Marriage , pp. 331 - 350
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbey, Ruth and Den Uyl, Douglas J. 2001. “The Chief Inducement? The Idea of Marriage as Friendship.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18(1):37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. 1985. “Beyond Carolene Products,” Harvard Law Review, 98(4):713–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. 2014. We the People: The Civil Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. 2014. “Dignity Is a Constitutional Principle,” New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2014/03/30/opinion/sunday/dignity-is-a-constitutional-principle.html?_r=1.Google Scholar
Alexandre, Michele. 2007. “Big Love: Is Feminist Polygamy an Oxymoron or a True Possibility?” Hastings Women's Law Journal, 18:3–30.Google Scholar
Altman, Irwin. 1996. “Polygamous Family Life: The Case of Contemporary Mormon Fundamentalists.” Utah Law Review, 367–91.Google Scholar
Altman, Irwin and Ginat, Joseph. 1996. Polygamous Families in Contemporary Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, Paul R., Booth, Alan, Johnson, David R., and Rodgers, Stacy J.. 2007. Alone Together: How Marriage in America Is Changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anapol, Deborah. 2010. Polyamory in the Twenty-First Century: Love and Intimacy With Multiple Partners. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1991. “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living.” Ethics, 102:4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, 1996. The Politics. Everson, Stephen trans. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arkes, Hadley. 1997. “The Role of Nature.” In Same-Sex Marriage: Pro and Con, ed. Sullivan, Andrew (New York: Vintage Books). 276–77.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. 1980. “Mill versus Paternalism.” Ethics, 90(4):470–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur v. Utah, 2004 UT 76, 99 P. 3d 820 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aviram, Hadar. 2008. “Make Love, Not Law: Perceptions of the Marriage Equality Struggle Among Polyamorist Activists.” Journal of Bisexuality, 7:261–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babst, Gordon. 2002. Liberal Constitutionalism, Marriage, and Sexual Orientation: A Contemporary Case for Dis-Establishment. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P. 2d 44 (Haw. 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Martha, Baines, Beverley, Amani, Bita, and Kaufman, Amy. 2006. “Expanding Recognition of Foreign Polygamous Marriages: Policy Implications for Canada.” In Queens University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 7–12. Prepared for Status of Women Canada. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1023896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker v. Vermont, 744 A. 2d 864 (Vt. 1999).Google Scholar
Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972).Google Scholar
Bala, Nicholas. 2005. “An International Review of Polygamy: Legal and Policy Implications for Canada.” In Polygamy in Canada: Legal and Social Implications for Women and Children – A Collection of Policy Research Reports (Ottawa: Research Directorate, Status of Women Canada).Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 2007. What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Legal Decision. Balkin, Jack M. ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack 2011. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack 2011. Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack 2013. “The New Originalism and the Uses of History.” Available at http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4936&context=flr.Google Scholar
Ball, Carlos A. 2003. The Morality of Gay Rights: An Exploration in Political Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ball, Carlos A. 2004. “The Positive in the Fundamental Right to Marry: Same-Sex Marriage in the Aftermath of Lawrence v. Texas.” Minnesota Law Review, 88:1184–232.Google Scholar
Ball, Carlos A. 2014. Same-Sex Marriage and Children: A Tale of History, Social Science, and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Ralph Richard. 2011. Is Marriage for White People? How the African-American Marriage Decline Affects Everyone. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Barash, David P. and Lipton, Judith Eve. 2001. The Myth of Monogamy: Fidelity and Infidelity in Animals and People. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Barker, Meg and Langdridge, Darren. 2010. “Introduction.” In Understanding Non-Monogamies, ed. Barker, Meg and Langdridge, Darren. New York: Routledge. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 1998. “Curing the Drug-Law Addiction: The Harmful Side Effects of Legal Prohibition.” In Drugs: Should We Legalize, Decriminalize or Deregulate? ed. Schaler, Jeffrey A.. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books: 155–80.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 2004. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 2006. “Scalia's Infidelity: A Critique of ‘Faint-Hearted’ Originalism.” University of Cincinnati Law Review, 75:17–24.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 2011. “Interpretation and Construction.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34:65–72.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 2001. Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Bruce. 1997. “Feminism, Liberalism and Cultural Pluralism.” Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(3):230–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1993. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Jo. 2014. Forcing the Spring: Inside the Fight for Marriage Equality. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Belle Terre v. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1 (1974).Google Scholar
Bedi, Sonu. 2009. Rejecting Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedi, Sonu 2013. Beyond Race, Sex, and Sexual Orientation: Legal Equality Without Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Jessica. 2009. “Polyamory: The Next Sexual Revolution?” Newsweek, July 29, 2009: www.newsweek.com/polyamory-next-sexual-revolution-82053.Google Scholar
Bennion, Janet. 2012. Polygamy in Primetime: Media, Gender, and Politics in Mormon Fundamentalism. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter. 1976. “Ideologies, Myths and Moralities.” In The Americans: 1976 (Critical Choices for Americans), ed. Kristol, Irving and Weaver, Paul. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Peter. 2013. Constitutional Conservatism: Liberty, Self-Government, and Political Moderation. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Anita. 2003. “For and Against Marriage: A Revision,” Michigan Law Review, 102:129–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian H. 2000. “State of the Union: The States’ Interest in the Marital Status of Their Citizens.” University of Miami Law Review, 55:1–30.Google Scholar
Black, D. Marisa. 2006. “Beyond Child Brides: Polygamy, Polyamory, Unique Familial Constructions, and the Law.” Journal of Law and Family Studies, 8:497–508.Google Scholar
Black's Law Dictionary, 1979. 5th edn. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Blankenhorn, David. 2007. The Future of Marriage. New York: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
Block, Jenny. 2008. Open: Love, Sex, and Life in an Open Marriage. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Allan. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Boaz, David. 1997. Libertarianism: A Primer. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971).Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1990. The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 2003. Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline. New York: Regan Books.Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).Google Scholar
Bowman, Cynthia Grant. 2010. Unmarried Couples, Law, and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bozzuti, Joseph. 2004. “The Constitutionality of Polygamy Prohibitions After Lawrence v. Texas: Is Scalia a Punchline or a Prophet?” Catholic Lawyer, 43:409–42.Google Scholar
Bradley, Martha Sonntag. 2011. “A Repeat of History: A Comparison of the Short Creek and Eldorado Raids on FLDS.” In Modern Polygamy in the United States: Historical, Cultural, and Legal Issues, ed. Jacobson, Cardell K. and Burton, Lara. New York: Oxford University Press: 3–39.Google Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth. 2005. “Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality?” In The Legacy of John Rawls, ed. Brooks, Thom and Frevenhagen, Fabian. New York: Continuum. 67–84.Google Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth 2010. Review: Tamara Metz, Untying the Knot: Marriage, the State, and the Case for Their Divorce, Philosophy in Review, 30(6):418–21.Google Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth 2010. “Minimal Marriage: What Political Liberalism Implies for Marriage Law,” Ethics, 120(2):302–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth 2012. “Marriage.” http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/marriage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth 2012. Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth 2014. “Recognizing Care: The Case for Friendship and Polyamory.” In Syracuse Law and Civic Engagement Forum: 1–36.Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom. 2009. “The Problem With Polygamy.” Philosophical Topics, 37(2):109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2008. “Tolerance as/in Civilization Discourse.” In Toleration and Its Limits, ed. Williams, Melissa S. and Waldron, Jeremy. New York: New York University Press. 406–41.Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Brunson, Samuel D. 2013. “Taxing Polygamy.” Washington University Law Review, 91:113–68.Google Scholar
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927).Google Scholar
Brown v. Buhman (2013) (Case No. 2:11-cv-0652).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1973. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Burnham, William. 2011. Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States, 5th edn. St. Paul, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Bushman, Richard Lyman. 2008. Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2000. “Competing Universalities.” In Contingency, Hegemony, and Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. New York: Verso. 136–81.Google Scholar
Cain, Patricia A. 1996. “Imagine There's No Marriage.” Quinnipiac Law Review, 16:27–60.Google Scholar
Cairncross, John. 1974. After Polygamy Was Made a Sin: The Social History of Christian Polygamy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2000. Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Calhoun. 2005. “Who's Afraid of Polygamy? Lessons for Same-Sex Marriage From the History of Polygamy.” San Diego Law Review, 42:1023–42.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1996. “Against Marriage and Motherhood.” Hypatia, 11(3):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Dale. 2012. Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. Texas. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Dale “‘Windsor Products’: Equal Protection From Animus,” pp. 183–285. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2424743.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne. 2005. “Marriage Licenses.” Minnesota Law Review, 89:1758–97.Google Scholar
Cave, Eric M. 2003. “Marital Pluralism: Making Marriage Safer for Love.” Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(3):331–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, Julia and Guiora, Amos N., “Polygamy: Not ‘Big Love’ but Significant Harm.” Available at http://ssm.com/abstract=2395370.Google Scholar
Chambers, David L. 1997. “Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage.” Hofstra Law Review, 26:53–83.Google Scholar
Chapman, Steve. 2001. “Two's Company; Three's a Marriage.” Slate, June 4.Google Scholar
Chatlani, Hema. 2006. “In Defense of Marriage: Why Same-Sex Marriage Will Not Lead Us Down a Slippery Slope Toward the Legalization of Polygamy.” Appalachian Law Journal, 6:367–91.Google Scholar
Chauncey, George. 2013. “The Long Road to Marriage Equality.” New York Times, June 27, A29.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2011. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies. 4th edn. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cherlin, Andrew J. 2009. The Marriage-Go-Around: The State of Marriage and the Family in America Today: New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Cherlin, Andrew J. 2010. “One Thousand and Forty-Nine Reasons Why It's Hard to Know When a Fact Is a Fact.” In Families as They Really Are, ed. Risman, Barbara J.. New York: W.W. Norton. 10–14.Google Scholar
Chua, Amy. 2011. Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993).Google Scholar
Clayton, Matthew, 2006. Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, 473 U.S. 472 (1985).Google Scholar
Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 (1974).Google Scholar
Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14 (1946).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1997. “Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26:3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Compassion in Dying v. Washington, 79 F. 3d 790 (9th Circuit 1996) (en banc).Google Scholar
Conly, Sarah. 2013. Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Coontz, Stephanie. 1992. The Way We Never Were: America's Families and the Nostalgia Trap. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Coontz, Stephanie 1997. The Way We Really Are: Coming to Terms With America's Changing Families. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Coontz, Stephanie 2005. Marriage, A History: How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Copi, Irving M. and Cohen, Carl. 1998. Introduction to Logic. 10th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Corvino, John. 2005. “Homosexuality and the PIB Argument.” Ethics, 115(2005):501–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corvino, John 2012. “The Case for Same-Sex Marriage.” In Debating Same-Sex Marriage, ed. Corvino, John and Gallagher, Maggie. New York: Oxford University Press. 4–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corvino, John 2013. What's Wrong With Homosexuality? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. 2000. Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, David. 2000. “Mystification, Neutrality, and Same-Sex Couples in Marriage.” In Just Marriage, ed. Shanley, Mary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 52–57.Google Scholar
Cruz, David 2001. “‘Just Don't Call It Marriage’: The First Amendment and Marriage as an Expressive Resource.” Southern California Law Review, 74:925–1026.Google Scholar
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990).Google Scholar
Davis, Adrienne D. 2010. “Regulating Polygamy: Intimacy, Default Rules, and Bargaining for Equality.” Columbia Law Review, 110:1955–2046.Google Scholar
Davis v. Beason, 133 U.S. 333 (1890).Google Scholar
De Marneffe, Peter. 2010. Liberalism and Prostitution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denbow, Jennifer M. 2015. Governed Through Choice: Autonomy, Technology, and the Politics of Reproduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Den Otter, Ronald C. 2009. Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePaulo, Bella. 2006. Singled Out: How Singles Are Stereotyped, Stigmatized, and Ignored, and Still Live Happily Ever After. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.Google Scholar
Dixon, Nicholas. 2001. “Boxing, Paternalism, and Legal Moralism.” Social Theory and Practice, 27(2):323–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon-Spear, Patricia. 2009. We Want for Our Sisters What We Want for Ourselves: African American Women Who Practice Polygyny by Consent. Baltimore, MD: Inprint Editions.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. 1998. “God and Man in the Yale Dormitories.” Virginia Law Review, 84:843–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, Shadia B. 2005. The Political Ideas of Leo Strauss. Updated edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. 2010. The Souls of Black Folk. ReadaClassic.com.Google Scholar
Duncan, Emily J. 2008. “The Positive Effects of Legalizing Polygamy: ‘Love Is a Many Splendored Thing.’” Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy, 15:315–37.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. “Paternalism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paternalism.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1986. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1996. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 2013. Religion Without God. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, Dossie and Hardy, Janet W.. 2009. The Ethical Slut: A Practical Guide to Polyamory and Open Relationships and Other Adventures. 2nd edn. New York: Celestial Arts.Google Scholar
Embry, Jessie L. 1984. “Effects of Polygamy on Mormon Women.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women's Studies, 7(3):56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emens, Elizabeth F. 2004. “Monogamy's Law: Compulsory Monogamy and Polyamorous Existence.” New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 29:277–376.Google Scholar
Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M. 2001. “Marriage as Trade: Bridging the Private/Private Distinction.” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 36:123–31.Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M. 2005. “The Business of Intimacy.” In Feminism Confronts Homo Economicus: Gender, Law, and Society, ed. Fineman, Martha and Dougherty, Terrance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 467–500.Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M. “Race Treason: The Untold Story of America's Ban on Polygamy.” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 19:287–366.Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M. 2013. “Love and Contracts in Don Quixote.” In Don Quixote: Interdisciplinary Connections, ed. Warshawsky, Matthew D. and Parr, James A.. Newark, NJ: Juan de la Cuesta. 251–70.Google Scholar
Ertman, Martha M. 2015. Love's Promises: How Formal and Informal Contracts Shape All Kinds of Families. Boston: Beacon Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1996. The Case for Same-Sex Marriage: From Sexual Liberty to Civilized Commitment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1999. Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 2008. Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America, 1861–2003. New York: Viking Books.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 2009. “A Liberal Vision of U.S. Family Law in 2020.” In The Constitution in 2020, ed. Balkin, Jack M. and Siegel, Reva B.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. and Spedale, Darren R.. 2006. Gay Marriage: For Better or for Worse? What We've Learned From the Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ettlebrick, Paula. 2004. “Since When Is Marriage a Path to Liberation?” in Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate (2nd edn.), ed. Baird, Robert M. and Rosenbaum, Stuart E.. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books: 257–61.Google Scholar
Fainaru-Wada, Mark and Fainaru, Steve. 2013. League of Denial: The NFL, Concussions, and the Battle for Truth. New York: Crown Archetype.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1986. Harm to Self: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 1995. The Neutered Mother: The Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson 2004. The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson 2004. “Why Marriage?” In Just Marriage, ed. Shanley, Mary Lyndon. New York: Oxford University Press. 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 1996. “Is Natural Law Theory Compatible With Limited Government?” In Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality: Contemporary Essays, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. 1–26.Google Scholar
Finnis, John 2002. “Natural Law: The Classical Tradition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, James E. 2013. Review: “The New Originalist Manifesto: Constitutional Originalism: A Debate.” Constitutional Commentary 28:539–60.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2007. Rawls. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Jeremy R. 2009. “A Prima Facie Case Against Civil Marriage.” Southwest Philosophy Review, 25(1):41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, David J. 1998. Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Michael J., Griffin, Stephen M., Rowe, Thomas D. Jr., and Solum, Lawrence B.. 2013. Constitutional Theory: Arguments and Perspectives. 4th edn. Albany, NY: Matthew Bender.Google Scholar
Gerstmann, Evan. 2004. Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gher, Jaime M. 2008. “Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage – Allies or Adversaries Within the Same-Sex Marriage Movement?” William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 14:559–603.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 1985. “Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade.” North Carolina Law Review, 63:375–86.Google ScholarPubMed
Gill et al. v. Office of Personnel Management, 682 F. 3d 1 (1st Cir.) (2012).Google Scholar
Girgis, Sherif, George, Robert P., and Anderson, Ryan T.. 2010. “What Is Marriage?” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34:246–87.Google Scholar
Girgis, Sherif 2012. What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense. New York: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
Goldfeder, Mark and Sheff, Elisabeth. 2011. “Children of Polyamorous Families: A First Empirical Look.” Journal of Law and Social Deviance, 150–243.Google Scholar
Goldfeder, Mark 2013. “It's Time to Reconsider Polygamy.” Available at www.cnn.com/2013/12/16/opinion/goldfeder-polygamy-laws/index.html?htp=op_+1.Google Scholar
Goldfeder, Mark 2015. Legalizing Plural Marriage: The Next Frontier in Family Law. Lebanon, NH: University of New England Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Goldwater, Barry. 1960. Conscience of a Conservative. Shepherdsville, KY: Victor Publishing.Google Scholar
Golinsky v. Office of Personnel Management, 824 F. Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Cal.) (2012).Google Scholar
Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007).Google Scholar
Goodridge v. Department of Health, 798 N.E. 2d 941 (Mass. 2003).Google Scholar
Gordon, Sarah Barringer. 2002. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gray, John. 1996. Mill on Liberty: A Defence. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gray, John 2012. “Most of Our Beliefs Are Unwarranted, Even Absurd.” Review: Leiter, Brian, Why Tolerate Religion? Available at www.newstatesman.com/print/culture/culture/2012/11/giant-leaps-mankind.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 2006. Religion and the Constitution: Fairness and Free Exercise. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mark D. and Litman, Harry. 1998. “The Meaning of Original Meaning.” Georgetown Law Journal, 86:569–619.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Kent. 2013. “The Slippery Slope to Polygamy and Incest.” The American Prospect, July 15. Available at http://prospect.org/article/slippery-slope-polygamy-and-incest.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Arin. 2014. “Who Are ‘The Polyamorists Next Door’? Q&A With Author Elisabeth Sheff.” Huffington Post, March 5.Google Scholar
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).Google Scholar
Gunther, Klaus. 1993. The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law. Farrell, John trans. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Gunther, Gerald. 1972. “Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection.” Harvard Law Review, 86:1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1980. “Children, Paternalism, and Education: A Liberal Argument.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9:338–58.Google Scholar
Haag, Pamela. 2011. Marriage Confidential: The Post-Romantic Age of Workhorse Wives, Royal Children, Undersexed Spouses and Rebel Couples Who Are Rewriting the Rules. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Hagerty, Barbara Bradley. 2008. “Some Muslims in U.S. Quietly Engage in Polygamy.” May 27. Available at www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?stpryId=90857818.Google Scholar
Halperin, Mark and Heilemann, John. 2013. Double Down: Game Change 2012. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Marci A. 2005. God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1963. Law, Liberty, and Morality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartog, Hendrick. 2000. Man and Wife in America: A History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Jeffrey Michael. 2007. “Polygamy Comes Out of the Closet: The New Strategy of Polygamy Activists.” Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, 3:100–29.Google Scholar
Heath, Melanie. 2012. One Marriage Under God: The Campaign to Promote Marriage in America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1995. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Wood, Allen W. ed. Nisbet, H. B. trans. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heyd, David. “Introduction.” In Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, ed. Heyd, David. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 3–17.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. 1991. Autonomy and Self-Respect. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U.S. __ (2013).Google Scholar
Holm v. Utah, 127 S. Ct. 1371 (2007).Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1999. “‘My Culture Made Me Do It’.” In Susan Moller Okin, Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? ed. Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1995. “Of Polygamy and Divorces.” In David Hume Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund: 181–87.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas. 2008. Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4d 757, 183 P. 3d 384, 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683 (2008).Google Scholar
Jordan, Jeff. 2004. “Contra Same-Sex Marriage.” In Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate (2nd edn.), ed. Baird, Robert M. and Rosenbaum, Stuart E.. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. 163–80.Google Scholar
Joslin, Courtney G. 2011. “Searching for Harm: Same-Sex Marriage and the Well-Being of Children.” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 46:81–101.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1963. “Duties Towards the Body in Respect of Sexual Impulse.” In Lectures on Ethics. Infield, Louis trans. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing: 162–68.Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S. 2010. “Let's Call the Whole Thing Off: Can States Abolish the Institution of Marriage?” California Law Review, 98(3):697–707.Google Scholar
Kelly, Erin and McPherson, Lionel. 2001. “On Tolerating the Unreasonable.” Journal of Political Philosophy, 9:38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, 289 Cnn. 135, 957 A. 2d 407 (2008).Google Scholar
Kilbride, Philip L. 1994. Plural Marriage for Our Times: A Reinvented Option? Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
King, Dennis. 1989. Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kirk, Russell. 2001. The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot (7th revised edn.). Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar
Kitchen v. Herbert (2013) (case no. 2:13-cv-217)Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2007. Brown v. Board of Education and the Civil Rights Movement. Abridged edition. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2013. From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Diane J. 2010. “Plural Marriage and Community Property Law.” Golden Gate Law Review, 41:33–89.Google Scholar
Knowles, Helen J. 2009. The Tie Goes to Freedom: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on Liberty. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. 2002. The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew 2006. Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew 2014. “Judging the Case Against Same-Sex Marriage.” University of Illinois Law Review, 432–65. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257557.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew 2010. “How Shall I Praise Thee? Brian Leiter on Respect for Religion.” San Diego Law Review, 47:961–85.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew 2013. “More Intuition Than Argument.” Review: Robert George, What Is Marriage? Commonweal, March 2013.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew 2013. Defending American Religious Neutrality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krakauer, Jon. 2004. Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Kraus, Jody S. 2002. “Philosophy of Contract Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, ed. Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott. New York: Oxford University Press. 687–751.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Stanley. 2004. “The Libertarian Question: Incest, Homosexuality, and Adultery.” In Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate (2nd edn.), ed. Baird, Robert M. and Rosenbaum, Stuart E.. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. 263–68.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Stanley 2005. “Here Come the Brides.” The Weekly Standard, vol. 11, issue 15, p. 3. Available at www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/006/494pqobc.asp.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1989. “Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality.” Ethics, 99:883–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will 1991. “Rethinking the Family.” Review: Susan Moller Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20(1):77–97.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lafollette, Hugh. 1980. “Licensing Parents.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9:182–97.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Charles III. 1993. “If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus.” In Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment . Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 53–88.Google Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2007. “Rethinking Legal Realism: Towards a Naturalized Jurisprudence.” In Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. 15–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian 2013. Why Tolerate Religion? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lecce, Steven. 2008. Against Perfectionism: Defending Liberal Neutrality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Edward H. 1949. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 2005. “The Meaning of Marriage: Thinking About Polygamy.” San Diego Law Review, 42:1049–58.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford 2006. Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven D. and Dubner, Stephen J.. 2005. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Levy, David. 2007. Love + Sex With Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Lister, Andrew. 2005. Review Essay: “How to Defend Same-Sex Marriage.” Polity, 37(3):116.Google Scholar
Lister, Andrew 2013. Public Reason and Political Community. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1993. The Second Treatise of Government. Laslett, Peter ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).Google Scholar
Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 1995. “Homosexuality and the Conservative Mind.” Georgetown Law Review, 84:261–300.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen 1997. “Sexuality and Liberty: Making Room for Nature and Tradition?” In Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature, ed. Estlund, David M. and Nussbaum, Martha C.. New York: Oxford University Press. 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen 2002. “Against the Old Sexual Morality of the New Natural Law.” In Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality: Contemporary Essays, ed. George, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press. 36–43.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen 2003. Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Jon. 2008. “Liberalism and the Polygamy Question.” Social Philosophy Today, 23:161–74.Google Scholar
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1888. Ancient Law (3rd American edn.). Sioux Falls, SD: NuVision Publications (2009).Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. 2007. Manliness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
March, Andrew F. 2010. “What Lies Beyond Same-Sex Marriage: Marriage, Reproductive Freedom and Future Persons in Liberal Public Justification.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 27(1):39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, Andrew F. 2011. “Is There a Right to Polygamy? Marriage, Equality and Subsidizing Families in Liberal Public Justification.” Journal of Moral Philosophy, 8:244–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1967. The Communist Manifesto. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
May, Simon Cabulea. 2014. “Liberal Feminism and the Ethics of Polygamy.” In Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal, ed. Cutas, Daniela and Chan, Sarah. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Maynard v. Hill, 125 U.S. 190, 205 (1888).Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C. 2006. The Place of Families: Fostering Capacity, Equality, and Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O. and Rappaport, Michael B.. 2009. “A New Theory of Interpretation and the Case Against Construction.” Northwestern University Law Review, 103:751–801.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O. 2013. Originalism and the Good Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Tamara. 2004. “Why We Should Disestablish Marriage.” In Just Marriage, ed. Shanley, Mary. New York: Oxford University Press. 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Tamara 2007. “The Liberal Case for Disestablishing Marriage.” Contemporary Political Theory, 6:196–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Tamara 2010. Untying the Knot: Marriage, the State, and the Case for their Divorce. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Tamara 2014. Review: Elizabeth Brake, Minimizing Marriage. Social Theory and Practice, 40:153–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).Google Scholar
Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1989. “The Subjection of Women.” In On Liberty and Other Writings, ed. Collini, Stefan. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1989. “On Liberty.” In On Liberty and Other Writings, ed. Collini, Stefan. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles. 1999. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha and Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1996. “Relational Rights and Responsibilities: Revisioning the Family in Liberal Political Theory and Law.” Hypatia, 11(1):4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, . 1973. Persian Letters. Betts, C. J. trans. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Mignon R. 2010. “Independent Women: Equality in African-American Lesbian Relationships.” In Families As They Really Are, ed. Risman, Barbara J.. New York: W. W. Norton. 214–27.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G. and Coleman, Jules. 1990. Philosophy of Law: An Introduction to Jurisprudence. Revised edition. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Michael G. 2006. “Polygamist Eye for the Monogamist Guy: Homosexual Sodomy … Gay Marriage … Is Polygamy Next?” Houston Law Review, 42:1451–86.Google Scholar
Nanda, Serena and Norgen, Jill. 1996. American Cultural Pluralism and Law (2nd edn.). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Nearing, Ryam. 1992. Loving More: The Polyfidelity Primer. Captain Cook, HI: PEP Publishing.Google Scholar
Norton, Ann. 2004. Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2008. Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America's Tradition of Religious Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2010. “A Right to Marry?” California Law Review, 98(3):667–96.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2010. From Disgust to Humanity: Sexual Orientation and Constitutional Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller 1990. Review, Carole Pateman, The Sexual Contract, “Feminism, the Individual, and Contract Theory.” Ethics, 100(3):658–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller 1999. “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” In Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? ed. Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 9–24, 587–97.Google Scholar
Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Daniel I., Shanley, Mary Lyndon, and Young, Iris. 2008. Illusion of Consent: Engaging With Carole Pateman. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1989. “Between Consenting Adults.” In Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 105–25.Google Scholar
On, Steve. 2010. “Interview With Carole Pateman by Steve On.” Contemporary Political Theory, 9:239–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. 2006. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory (2nd edn.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole and Mills, Charles. 2007. Contract and Domination. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 704 F. Supp. 2d. 921 (N.D. Cal. 2010).Google Scholar
Perry v. Brown, 671 F. 3d 1052 (2012).Google Scholar
Pinello, Daniel R. 2006. America's Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).Google Scholar
Plato, 1945. The Republic of Plato. Cornford, Francis MacDonald trans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).Google Scholar
Plyer v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961).Google Scholar
Polikoff, Nancy D. 2008. Beyond (Straight and Gay) Marriage: Valuing All Families Under the Law. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1992. Sex and Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2013. Reflections on Judging. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1987. The Many Faces of Realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar
Quill v. Vacco, 80 F. 3d 716 (2d Cir. 1996).Google Scholar
Quinton, Anthony. 1995. “Conservatism.” In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. Goodin, Robert E. and Pettit, Philip. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell. 244–68.Google Scholar
Quong, Jonathan. 2011. Liberalism Without Perfection. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rauch, Jonathan. 1997. “Marrying Somebody.” In Same-Sex Marriage: Pro and Con, ed. Sullivan, Andrew. New York: Vintage Books. 285–88.Google Scholar
Rauch, Jonathan 2004. Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Ravenscroft, Anthony D. 2004. Polyamory: Roadmaps for the Clueless and Hopeful. Santa Fe, NM: Fenris Brothers.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1999. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” In The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 129–80.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, Milton C. 1999. Alone Together: Law and the Meanings of Marriage. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnerus, Mark. 2012. “How Different Are the Adult Children of Parents Who Have Same-Sex Relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study.” Social Science Research, 41:752–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878).Google Scholar
Richards, David A. J. 1999. Identity and the Case for Gay Rights: Race, Gender, Religion as Analogies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, David A. J. 2005. The Case for Gay Rights: From Bowers to Lawrence and Beyond. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickless, Samuel C. 2005. “Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage: A Response to Calhoun.” San Diego Law Review, 42:1043–47.Google Scholar
Risman, Barbara J. 2010. “Families: A Great American Institution.” In Families As They Really Are, ed. Risman, Barbara J.. New York: W. W. Norton. 452–58.Google Scholar
Ristroph, Alice and Murray, Melissa. 2010. “Disestablishing the Family.” Yale Law Journal, 119:1236–79.Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1995. Philosophy of Social Science (2nd edn.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy. 1997. “Democratic Sex: Reynolds v. U.S., Sexual Relations, and Community.” In Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature, ed. Estlund, David M. and Nussbaum, Martha C.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossum, Ralph A. 2006. Antonin Scalia's Jurisprudence: Text and Tradition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1957. “Our Sexual Ethics.” In Why I Am Not a Christian. New York: Simon and Schuster. 168–78.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1970. Marriage and Morals. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Ruthven, Malise. 2012. Islam: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1974. J.S. Mill. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan 1998. “Mill in a Liberal Landscape.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 497–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, Brook J. 2008. “Re-Thinking Civil Unions and Same-Sex Marriage.” Monist, 91:578–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1989. “Moral Argument and Liberal Toleration: Abortion and Homosexuality.” California Law Review, 77:521–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2009. Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, Jeanne Heffernan. 2011. Review: “A New Disestablishmentarianism.” The Review of Politics, 73:675–77.Google Scholar
Schultz, Marjorie. 1982. “Contractual Ordering of Marriage: A New Model for State Policy.” California Law Review, 70:207–334.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard. 1993. A History of the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweber, Howard. 2012. Democracy and Authenticity: Toward a Theory of Public Justification. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 2004. “Just Marriage: On the Public Importance of Private Unions.” In Just Marriage, ed. Shanley, Mary Lyndon. New York: Oxford University Press. 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J. 2007. “The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed.” In Ronald Dworkin, ed. Ripstein, Arthur. New York: Cambridge University Press. 22–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheff, Elisabeth. 2014. The Polyamorists Next Door: Inside Multi-Partner Relationships and Families. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sigman, Shayna M. 2006. “Everything Lawyers Know About Polygamy Is Wrong.” Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 16:101–85.Google Scholar
Shilts, Randy. 1982. The Mayor of Castro Street. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Shrage, Laurie. 2013. “Reforming Marriage: A Comparative Approach.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 30(2):107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Stephen A. 2014. Universal Rights and the Constitution. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Singular, Stephen. 2009. When Men Become Gods: Mormon Polygamist Warren Jeffs, His Cult of Fear, and the Women Who Fought Back. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John. 2007. Why Read Mill Today? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slark, Samantha. 2004. “Are Anti-Polygamy Laws an Unconstitutional Infringement on the Liberty Interests of Consenting Adults?” Journal of Law and Family Studies, 6:451–60.Google Scholar
Smith, Patricia. 2005. “Four Themes in Feminist Legal Theory: Difference, Dominance, Domesticity, and Denial.” In The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. Golding, Martin P. and Edmundson, William A. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Norman. 1996. Judaism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B. Legal Theory Blog: “Legal Theory Lexicon 071: The New Originalism.” Available at http://lsolum.typepad.com/legal_theory_lexicon/2013/02/legal-theory-lexicon-071-the-new-originalism.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B 2006. “Pluralism and Public Legal Reason.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 15:7–23.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B 2010. “The Interpretation-Construction Distinction.” Constitutional Commentary, 27(2010):95–118.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B “Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause.” p. 3 (Draft, April 18, 2010). Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1263885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B 2011. “We Are All Originalists Now.” In Constitutional Originalism: A Debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 1–77.Google Scholar
Song, Sarah. 2007. Justice, Gender, and the Politics of Multiculturalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1990. Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth-Century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith 1996. In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith 2011. Unhitched: Love, Marriage, and Family Values from West Hollywood to Western China. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith and Meadow, Tey. 2009. “New Slants on the Slippery Slope: The Politics of Polygamy and Gay Family Rights in South Africa and the United States.” Politics and Society, 37:167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Barbara. 2001. “From One-Size-Fits-All to Postmodern Marriage Law.” California Law Review, 89:1479–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Edward. 2002. “Law, Sexual Orientation, and Gender.” In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, ed. Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 990–1039.Google Scholar
Strassberg, Maura I. 1997. “Distinctions of Form or Substance? Monogamy, Polygamy, and Same-Sex Marriage.” North Carolina Law Review, 75:1501–65.Google Scholar
Strassberg, Maura I. 2003. “The Challenge of Postmodern Polygamy: Considering Polyamory.” Capital University Law Review, 31:439–563.Google Scholar
Strassberg, Maura I. 2014. “Distinguishing Polygamy and Polyamory Under the Criminal Law.” In Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal, ed. Cutas, Daniela and Chan, Sarah. London: Bloomsbury. 160–72.Google Scholar
Strauss, David A. 2010. The Living Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Gregg. 2012. “Is Polygamy Inherently Unequal?” Ethics, 122(3):516–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Gregg 2015. “Why the State Cannot ‘Abolish Marriage’: A Partial Defense of Legal Marriage Based on the Structure of Intimate Duties.” Indiana Law Review, 1–67 (forthcoming) Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2473182.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew. 1997. “Three's a Crowd.” In Same-Sex Marriage: Pro and Con, ed. Sullivan, Andrew. New York: Vintage Books. 278–82.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1988. “Sexual Orientation and the Constitution: A Note on the Relationship Between Due Process and Equal Protection.” University of Chicago Law Review, 55:1161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. “On the Expressive Function of Law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144:2012–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2004. “Of Federalism and Caste.” In Just Marriage, ed. Shanley, Mary Lyndon. New York: Oxford University Press. 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2005. “The Right to Marry.” Cardozo Law Review, 26:1081–2120.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2009. A Constitution of Many Minds: Why the Founding Document Doesn't Mean What It Meant Before. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. and Thaler, Richard H.. 2008. “Privatizing Marriage.” Monist, 91(3&4):377–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 2012. Failing Law Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taormino, Tristan. 2008. Opening Up: A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships. San Francisco: Cleis Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 25–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1975. “The Right to Privacy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4:295–314.Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David. 1962. “Civil Disobedience.” In Thoreau: Walden and Other Writings. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Thoreau, Henry David 1962. “Walden.” In Thoreau: Walden and Other Writings. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo. 1961. Anna Karenina. Magarshack, David trans. New York: Signet Classic.Google Scholar
Torcello, Lawrence G. 2008. “Is the State Endorsement of Any Marriage Justifiable? Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions, and the Marriage Privatization Model.” Public Affairs Quarterly, 22(1):43–61.Google Scholar
Torcello, Lawrence G. April, 1: (Current Policy) http://www.acluutah.org/pluralmarriage.htm.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. 1988. American Constitutional Law (2nd edn.). New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H 2004. “Lawrence v. Texas: The ‘Fundamental Right’ That Dare Not Speak Its Name.” Harvard Law Review, 117:1893–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H and Matz, Joshua, 2014. Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Turley, Jonathan. 2010. Expert Report Prepared for the Amicus Curiae. October 20, p. 5.Google Scholar
Turner v. Safley, 428 U.S. 78 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweedy, Ann. 2011. “Polyamory as a Sexual Orientation.” University of Cincinnati Law Review, 79:1461–515Google Scholar
Urist, Jacoba. 2012. “Postnups Becoming More Popular, but They're Not for Everyone.” Available at www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/20/postnups-becoming-more-popular-but-they-re-not-for-everyone.html.Google Scholar
United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S 515 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States v. Carolene Products, 304 U.S. 144 (1938).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528 (1973).Google Scholar
United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. __ (2013).Google Scholar
Utah v. Arthur, 2004 UT 76; 99 P. 3d 820 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utah v. Green, 76 Utah (2004).Google Scholar
Utah v. Holm, 2006 UT 31; 137 P.3d 726 (2006).Google Scholar
Vallier, Kevin and D'Agostino, Fred, 2013. “Public Justification.” Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justification-public.Google Scholar
Vanderheiden, Steve. 1999. “Why the State Should Stay Out of the Wedding Chapel.” Public Affairs Quarterly, 13(2):175–90.Google Scholar
Vasquez, Richard A. 2001/2002. “The Practice of Polygamy: Legitimate Free Exercise or Religion or Legitimate Public Menace? Revisiting Reynolds in Light of Modern Constitution Jurisprudence.” New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 5:225–53.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene. 2005. “Same-Sex Marriage and Slippery Slopes.” Hofstra Law Review, 33:1155–201.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene 2014. “Why Not Get the State Out of the Marriage Business?” Available at http://washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/04/10why-not-get-the-state-out-of-the-marriage-business.Google Scholar
Waite, Linda J. and Gallagher, Maggie, 2000. The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. “Legislation and Moral Neutrality.” In Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 143–67.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 1993. “Mill and the Value of Moral Distress.” In Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 115–33.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2002. “One Law for All? The Logic of Cultural Accommodation.” Washington and Lee Law Review, 59:3–34.Google Scholar
Wall, Steven. 1998. Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, Steven and Klosko, George. 2003. “Introduction.” Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory, ed. Wall, Steven and Klosko, George. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 1–27.Google Scholar
Waluchow, Wilfrid. 2013. “On the Neutrality of Charter Reasoning.” In Neutrality and Theory of Law, ed. Beltran, Jordi Ferrer, Moreso, Jose Juan, and Papayannis, Diego M.. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. 203–24.Google Scholar
Ward, Cassiah M. 2004. “I Now Pronounce You Husband and Wives: Lawrence v. Texas and the Practice of Polygamy in Modern America.” William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 11:131–51.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble With Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).Google Scholar
Warren, Elizabeth and Tyagi, Amelia Warren. 2003. The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Parents are Going Broke. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wax, Amy. 1996. “The Two-Parent Family in the Liberal State: The Case for Selective Subsidies.” Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 1:491–550.Google Scholar
Wax, Amy 2007. “Traditionalism, Pluralism, and Same-Sex Marriage.” Rutgers Law Review, 59:377–412.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. 1999. “The Fundamental Argument for Same-Sex Marriage.” Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(3):225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph 2012. “The Meaning of Same-Sex Marriage.” New York Times, May 24. Available at opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/24/marriage-meaning-and-equality/?_php=true&_type=blog&_r=0.Google Scholar
Weisberg, D. Kelly and Appleton, Susan Frelich, 2006. Modern Family Law: Cases and Materials (3rd edn.). New York: Aspen Publishers. 234–44.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Lenore J. 1981. The Marriage Contract: A Guide to Living With Lovers and Spouses. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wellington, Adrian Alex. 1995. “Why Should Liberals Support Same Sex Marriage?” Journal of Social Philosophy, 26(3):5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Robin. 2007. Marriage, Sexuality, and Gender. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
West, Robin 2014. “From Choice to Reproductive Justice: De-Constitutionalizing Abortion Rights.” In Philosophy of Law (9th edn.), ed. Feinberg, Joel, Coleman, Jules, and Kutz, Christopher. Boston: Wadsworth. 210–29.Google Scholar
West, Robin 2014. Teaching Law: Justice, Politics, and the Demands of Professionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 1991. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 1999. Constitution Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2004. “The New Originalism.” Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, 2:599–613.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2013. “Originalism: A Critical Introduction.” Fordham Law Review, 82:375–409.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1996. “Toleration: Impossible Virtue?” In Toleration: An Elusive Virtue, ed. Heyd, David. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 18–27.Google Scholar
Wilson, Donald. 2004. “Kant and the Marriage Right.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 85:103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windsor v. United States, 570 U.S. __ (2013).Google Scholar
Wing, Adrien Katherine. 2003. “Polygamy in Black America.” In Critical Race Feminism: A Reader (2nd edn.), ed. Wing, Adrien Katherine. New York: New York University Press. 186–94.Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam. 2006. “Fatal in Theory and Strict in Fact: An Empirical Analysis of Strict Scrutiny in Federal Courts.” Vanderbilt Law Review, 59:790–871.Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam 2013. “Are Polygamy Bans Unconstitutional?” Huffington Post, December 16. Available at www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/are-polygamy-bans-unconst_b_4454076.html.Google Scholar
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr.. 2012. From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and the Law in the Western Tradition (2nd edn.). Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr.. 2015. The Western Case for Monogamy Over Polygamy. New York: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittes, Benjamin. 2006. Confirmation Wars: Preserving Independent Courts in Angry Times. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul. 1970. In Defense of Anarchism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Evan. 2004. Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality, and Gay People's Right to Marry. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1993. “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” In Political Writings, ed. Todd, Janet. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 69–296.Google Scholar
Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978).Google Scholar
Zakaras, Alex. 2009. Individuality and Mass Democracy: Mill, Emerson, and the Burdens of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard. 2008. Polygamy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, Edward A. 2006. “Deregulating Marriage: The Pro-Marriage Case for Abolishing Civil Marriage.” Cardozo Law Review, 27:1161–220.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Ronald C. Den Otter, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: In Defense of Plural Marriage
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104231.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Ronald C. Den Otter, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: In Defense of Plural Marriage
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104231.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Ronald C. Den Otter, California Polytechnic State University
  • Book: In Defense of Plural Marriage
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104231.009
Available formats
×