Book contents
- Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-dumping Investigations
- Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-dumping Investigations
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Anti-dumping Laws
- 3 WTO Disputes on Anti-dumping Procedures
- 4 Procedures of the US, EU and the Position of China under the Anti-dumping Investigations
- 5 The Fieldwork and Its Findings
- 6 Possible Solutions for Protectionist Anti-dumping Procedures
- 7 Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
4 - Procedures of the US, EU and the Position of China under the Anti-dumping Investigations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 May 2024
- Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-dumping Investigations
- Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-dumping Investigations
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Anti-dumping Laws
- 3 WTO Disputes on Anti-dumping Procedures
- 4 Procedures of the US, EU and the Position of China under the Anti-dumping Investigations
- 5 The Fieldwork and Its Findings
- 6 Possible Solutions for Protectionist Anti-dumping Procedures
- 7 Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 4 explains the anti-dumping investigation procedures of the US and EU and their differences. China represents a special case for other members with its socialist market economy and growing impact in the global political arena. Within the scope of this research, China needs to be evaluated in detail as (1) nearly one-quarter of all anti-dumping measures were taken against China, (2) Chinese exporters complain about the anti-dumping investigations both at the domestic level and the WTO DSM, (3) the attitude towards Chinese exporters eventually turns into general policies applicable to the other WTO members as the ADA is silent on some procedural issues. Thus, Chapter 4 describes the anti-dumping procedures of the US and EU and the position of China. These different procedural rules form a connection with the notion of hidden trade protectionism and anti-dumping.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Improving Procedural Justice in Anti-Dumping InvestigationsLessons from the US and EU Practices Against China, pp. 108 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024